ABSTRACT Managing freshwater resources sustainably under future climatic and hydrological uncertainty poses novel challenges. Rehabilitation of ageing infrastructure and construction of new

dams are widely viewed as solutions to diminish climate risk, but attaining the broad goal of freshwater sustainability will require expansion of the prevailing water resources management

paradigm beyond narrow economic criteria to include socially valued ecosystem functions and services. We introduce a new decision framework, eco-engineering decision scaling (EEDS), that

explicitly and quantitatively explores trade-offs in stakeholder-defined engineering and ecological performance metrics across a range of possible management actions under unknown future

river conservation ecology to design and operate water infrastructure for social and environmental benefits. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of

subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only

$17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS DIAGNOSING CHALLENGES AND

SETTING PRIORITIES FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE Article Open access 17 January 2022 A META-MODEL OF SOCIO-HYDROLOGICAL PHENOMENA FOR SUSTAINABLE WATER

MANAGEMENT Article 13 November 2023 INDICATOR METRICS AND TEMPORAL AGGREGATIONS INTRODUCE AMBIGUITIES IN WATER SCARCITY ESTIMATES Article Open access 02 July 2024 REFERENCES * _International

Commission on Large Dams_ (2014); http://www.icold-cigb.org, * Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L. & Tockner, K. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. _Aquat.

Sci._ 77, 161–170 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Stakhiv, E. Z. Pragmatic approaches for water management under climate change uncertainty. _J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc._ 47, 1183–1196

(2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Ansar, A., Flyvbjerg, B., Budzier, A. & Lunn, D. Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. _Energy

Policy_ 69, 43–56 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * World Commission on Dams _Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making_ (Earthscan, 2000). * _Water and Climate Change

Adaptation: Policies to Navigate Uncharted Waters_ (OECD, 2013). * Pearce, D., Atkinson, G. & Mourato, S. _Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments_ (OECD, 2006).

Google Scholar  * Brown, P. H., Tullos, D., Tilt, B., Magee, D. & Wolf, A. T. Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective. _J. Environ.

Manage._ 90, S303–S311 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Richter, B. D. et al. Lost in development's shadow: The downstream human consequences of dams. _Water Alternat._ 3, 14–42

(2010). Google Scholar  * Liermann, C. R., Nilsson, C., Robertson, J. & Ng, R. Y. Implications of dam obstruction for global freshwater fish diversity. _BioScience_ 62, 539–548 (2012).

Article  Google Scholar  * Auerbach, D. A., Deisenroth, D. B., McShane, R. R., McCluney, K. E. & Poff, N. L. Beyond the concrete: Accounting for ecosystem services from free-flowing

rivers. _Ecosyst. Serv._ 10, 1–5 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Tockner, K. & Stanford, J. A. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. _Environ. Conserv._ 29, 308–330

(2002). Article  Google Scholar  * Olden, J. D. et al. Are large-scale flow experiments informing the science and management of freshwater ecosystems? _Front. Ecol. Environ._ 12, 176–185

(2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Watts, R. J., Richter, B. D., Opperman, J. J. & Bowmer, K. H. Dam reoperation in an era of climate change. _Mar. Freshwater Res._ 62, 321–327 (2011).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lovett, R. A. Dam removals: Rivers on the run. _Nature_ 511, 521–523 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human

water security and river biodiversity. _Nature_ 467, 555–561 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Lehner, B. et al. High-resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for

sustainable river-flow management. _Front. Ecol. Environ._ 9, 494–502 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * _Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water

Synthesis_ (World Resources Institute, 2005). * Griggs, D. et al. Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet. _Nature_ 495, 305–307 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Rockström, J. et al. The unfolding water drama in the Anthropocene: Towards a resilience-based perspective on water for global sustainability. _Ecohydrology_ 7, 1249–1261 (2014). Google

Scholar  * _National Action Plan: Priorities for Managing Freshwater Resources in a Changing Climate_ (Interagency Climate Change Adaptation Task Force, 2011). * _Directive 2000/60/EC of the

European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy_ (European Commission, 2000). * _Ecological Flows in the

Implementation of the Water Framework Directive_ (European Commission, 2015). * _National Water Initiative_ (Australian National Water Commission, 2005). * Folke, C. et al. Resilience

thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. _Ecology and Society_ 15, 20 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Pittock, J. & Lankford, B. A. Environmental water

requirements: Demand managment in an era of water scarcity. _J. Integr. Environ. Sci._ 7, 75–93 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Gleick, P. H. Global freshwater resources: Soft-path

solutions for the 21st century. _Science_ 302, 1524–1528 (2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tzoulas, K. et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green

Infrastructure: A literature review. _Landscape Urban Plan._ 81, 167–178 (2007). Article  Google Scholar  * Milly, P. C. D. et al. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? _Science_

319, 573–574 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Brown, C. The end of reliability. _J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage._ 136, 143–145 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Hallegatte, S.

Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. _Glob. Environ. Change_ 19, 240–247 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Haasnoot, M., Middelkoop, H., Van Beek, E. & Van Deursen, W. A

method to develop sustainable water management strategies for an uncertain future. _Sustain. Dev._ 19, 369–381 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Walker, W. E., Haasnoot, M. & Kwakkel,

J. H. Adapt or perish: A review of planning approaches for adaptation under deep uncertainty. _Sustainability_ 5, 955–979 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Reuss, M. Ecology, planning, and

river management in the United States: Some historical reflections. _Ecol. Soc._ 10, 34 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Muller, M. The 'nexus' as a step back towards a more

coherent water resource management paradigm. _Water Alternat._ 8, 675–694 (2015). Google Scholar  * La Quesne, T., Kendy, E. & Weston, D. _The Implementation Challenge: Taking Stock of

Government Policies to Protect and Restore Environmental Flows_ (World Wildlife Fund, 2010). * Pahl-Wostl, C. et al. Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water

uses. _Curr. Op. Environ. Sustain._ 5, 341–351 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Brown, C., Ghile, Y., Laverty, M. & Li, K. Decision scaling: Linking bottom-up vulnerability analysis

with climate projections in the water sector. _Water Resour. Res._ 48, W09537 (2012). Google Scholar  * Brown, C., Werick, W., Leger, W. & Fay, D. A decision-analytic approach to

managing climate risks: application to the upper Great Lakes. _J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc._ 47, 524–534 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Stainforth, D. A., Allen, M. R., Tredger, E. R.

& Smith, L. A. Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. _Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A_ 365, 2145–2161 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Rocheta, E.,

Sugiyanto, M., Johnson, F., Evans, J. & Sharma, A. How well do general circulation models represent low-frequency rainfall variability? _Water Resour. Res._ 50, 2108–2123 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar  * Sun, Y., Solomon, S., Dai, A. & Portmann, R. W. How often does it rain? _J. Clim._ 19, 916–934 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Wilby, R. L. & Dessai, S.

Robust adaptation to climate change. _Weather_ 65, 180–185 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Weaver, C. P. et al. Improving the contribution of climate model information to decision

making: The value and demands of robust decision frameworks. _WIREs Clim. Change_ 4, 39–60 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Steinschneider, S., Wi, S. & Brown, C. The integrated

effects of climate and hydrologic uncertainty on future flood risk assessments. _Hydrol. Process._ 29, 2823–2839 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Ghile, Y., Taner, M., Brown, C., Grijsen,

J. & Talbi, A. Bottom-up climate risk assessment of infrastructure investment in the Niger River Basin. _Climatic Change_ 122, 97–110 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Singh, R.,

Wagener, T., Crane, R., Mann, M. & Ning, L. A vulnerability driven approach to identify adverse climate and land use change combinations for critical hydrologic indicator thresholds:

Application to a watershed in Pennsylvania, USA. _Water Resour. Res._ 50, 3409–3427 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * _Aquatic Ecosystems, Water Quality, and Global Change: Challenges of

Conducting Multi-Stressor Vulnerability Assessments_ (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2011). * Reed, M. S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review.

_Biol. Conserv._ 141, 2417–2431 (2008). Article  Google Scholar  * Poff, N. L. et al. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional

environmental flow standards. _Freshwater Biol._ 55, 147–170 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Wilby, R. L., Fenn, C. R., Wood, P. J., Timlett, R. & LeQuesne, T. Smart licensing and

environmental flows: Modeling framework and sensitivity testing. _Water Resour. Res._ 47, W12524 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Gregory, R. et al. _Structured Decision Making: A

Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices_ (John Wiley & Sons, 2012). Book  Google Scholar  * Moody, P. & Brown, C. Modeling stakeholder-defined climate risk on the Upper

Great Lakes. _Water Resour. Res._ 48, W10525 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Moody, P. & Brown, C. Robustness indicators for evaluation under climate change: Application to the upper

Great Lakes. _Water Resour. Res._ 49, 3576–3588 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Kareiva, P. M. Dam choices: Analyses for multiple needs. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 109, 5553–5554 (2012).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Armah, J. et al. _Principles and Guidelines for Evaluating Federal Water Projects: US Army Corps of Engineers Planning and the Use of Benefit Cost Analysis_

(Report for the Congressional Research Service, 2009). Google Scholar  * Kwadijk, J. C. et al. Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: a case study

in the Netherlands. _Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Climate Change_ 1, 729–740 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * _Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: General Synthesis_

(World Resources Institute, 2005). * Poff, N. L. et al. The natural flow regime. _BioScience_ 47, 769–784 (1997). Article  Google Scholar  * Bunn, S. E. & Arthington, A. H. Basic

principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. _Environ. Manage._ 30, 492–507 (2002). Article  Google Scholar  * Opperman, J. J., Luster, R.,

McKenney, B. A., Roberts, M. & Meadows, A. W. Ecologically functional floodplains: connectivity, flow regime, and scale. _J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc._ 46, 211–226 (2010). Article  Google

Scholar  * Nilsson, C. & Svedmark, M. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: Riparian plant communities. _Environ. Manage._ 30, 468–480 (2002). Article

  Google Scholar  * Cushman, R. M. Review of ecological effects of rapidly varying flows downstream from hydroelectric facilities. _N. Am. J. Fish. Manage._ 5, 330–339 (1985). Article 

Google Scholar  * Steinschneider, S. & Brown, C. A semiparametric multivariate, multisite weather generator with low-frequency variability for use in climate risk assessments. _Water

Resour. Res._ 49, 7205–7220 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Whateley, S., Steinschneider, S. & Brown, C. A climate change range-based method for estimating robustness for water

resources supply. _Water Resour. Res._ 50, 8944–8961 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Maurer, E., Wood, A., Adam, J., Lettenmaier, D. & Nijssen, B. A long-term hydrologically based

dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. _J. Climate_ 15, 3237–3251 (2002). Article  Google Scholar  * Haasnoot, M., Middelkoop, H., Offermans, A., Van

Beek, E. & Van Deursen, W. Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment. _Climatic Change_ 115, 795–819 (2012). Article  Google Scholar 

* Ranger, N., Reeder, T. & Lowe, J. Addressing 'deep' uncertainty over long-term climate in major infrastructure projects: Four innovations of the Thames Estuary 2100 Project.

_EURO J. Decis. Process._ 1, 233–262 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Grill, G. et al. An index-based framework for assessing patterns and trends in river fragmentation and flow regulation

by global dams at multiple scales. _Environ. Res. Lett._ 10, 015001 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Dudgeon, D. et al. Freshwater biodiversity: Importance, threats, status and

conservation challenges. _Biol. Rev._ 81, 163–182 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Poff, N. L., Olden, J. D., Merritt, D. M. & Pepin, D. M. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by

dams and global biodiversity implications. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 104, 5732–5737 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Jager, H. I., Efroymson, R. A., Opperman, J. J. & Kelly, M.

R. Spatial design principles for sustainable hydropower development in river basins. _Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev._ 45, 808–816 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Poff, N. L. Rivers of the

Anthropocene? _Front. Ecol. Environ._ 12, 427–427 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Gedan, K., Kirwan, M., Wolanski, E., Barbier, E. & Silliman, B. The present and future role of

coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: Answering recent challenges to the paradigm. _Climatic Change_ 106, 7–29 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * _The Brisbane Declaration:

Environmental Flows are Essential for Freshwater Ecosystem Health and Human Well-being_ (10th Int. River Symp., 2007); http://go.nature.com/MgROdG * Haasnoot, M., Kwakkel, J. H., Walker, W.

E. & ter Maat, J. Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. _Glob. Environ. Change_ 23, 485–498 (2013). Article  Google

Scholar  * Hallegatte, S., Shah, A., Lempert, R., Brown, C. & Gill, S. _Investment Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty: Application to Climate Change_ (World Bank Group, 2012). Book 

Google Scholar  * Wiens, J. A. & Hobbs, R. J. Integrating conservation and restoration in a changing world. _BioScience_ 65, 302–312 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Humphries, P.

& Winemiller, K. O. Historical impacts on river fauna, shifting baselines, and challenges for restoration. _BioScience_ 59, 673–684 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Acreman, M. et al.

Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world. _Front. Ecol. Environ._ 12, 466–473 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Moyle, P. B. Novel aquatic

ecosystems: The new reality for streams in California and other mediterranean climate regions. _River Res. Appl._ 30, 1335–1344 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Allen, C. R., Cumming, G.

S., Garmestani, A. S., Taylor, P. D. & Walker, B. H. Managing for resilience. _Wildlife Biol._ 17, 337–349 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E. & Harris, J. A.

Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. _Trends Ecol. Evol._ 24, 599–605 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Richter, B. D., Mathews, R., Harrison, D. L. &

Wigington, R. Ecologically sustainable water management: Managing river flows for ecological integrity. _Ecol. Appl._ 13, 206–224 (2003). Article  Google Scholar  * Arthington, A. H.

_Environmental Flows: Saving Rivers in the Third Millennium_ (Univ. California Press, 2012). Book  Google Scholar  * Suen, J-P. & Eheart, J. W. Reservoir management to balance ecosystem

and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime. _Water Resour. Res._ 42, W03417 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Yin, X-A., Yang, Z-F. & Petts, G. E.

Reservoir operating rules to sustain environmental flows in regulated rivers. _Water Resour. Res._ 47, W08509 (2011). Google Scholar  * Hermoso, V. et al. Systematic planning for river

rehabilitation: integrating multiple ecological and economic objectives in complex decisions. _Freshwater Biol._ 57, 1–9 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * _Water Evaluation and Planning

(WEAP) System_ (Stockholm Environment Institute, accessed 21 April 2014); http://www.weap21.org * Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F. & Burges, S. J. A simple hydrologically based

model of land surface water and energy fluxes for GSMs, _J. Geophys. Res._ 99 (D7), 14415–14428 (1994). Article  Google Scholar  * Cuo, L., Lettenmaier, D. P., Mattheussen, B. V., Storck,

P. & Wiley, M. Hydrologic prediction for urban watersheds with the Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model. _Hydrol. Process._ 22, 4205–4213 (2008). Article  Google Scholar  *

Schoeman, J., Allan, C. & Finlayson, C. M. A new paradigm for water? A comparative review of integrated, adaptive and ecosystem-based water management in the Anthropocene. _Int. J. Water

Resour. Dev._ 30, 377–390 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We acknowledge S. Steinschneider for developing the stochastic weather generator for the Iowa

River Basin; S. Wi for the VIC hydrologic model development; D. LeFever for support in developing the reservoir systems model; and R. Olsen for his help in providing hydraulic modelling

tools and economic information for the Coralville Lake flood control system. Special thanks to P. Clark for artwork in Fig. 1. Additional support for C.M.B. and C.M.S was provided by the NSF

CAREER Award (CBET-1054762). The views in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the OECD or its member countries. This article has been peer

reviewed and approved for publication consistent with USGS Fundamental Science Practices (http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1367/,) and we thank J. Friedman of the USGS for his constructive

comments. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This paper resulted from a synthesis project funded

by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) under National Science Foundation Award #DBI-1052875. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Biology and

Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Campus Mail 1878, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 80523, Colorado, USA N. LeRoy Poff * Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of

Massachusetts, 12B Marston Hall, 130 Natural Resources Road, Amherst, 01003, Massachusetts, USA Casey M. Brown & Caitlin M. Spence * US Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center,

2150 Centre Avenue, Building C, Fort Collins, 80526, Colorado, USA Theodore E. Grantham * Alliance for Global Water Adaptation, 7640 NW Hoodview Circle, Corvallis, 97330, Orlando, USA John

H. Matthews * National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, University of Maryland, 1 Park Place, Annapolis, 21401, Maryland, USA Margaret A. Palmer * Department of Geography, Loughborough

University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK Robert L. Wilby * Department of Scenarios and Policy Analysis, Deltares, PO Box 177, Delft, 2600 MH, The Netherlands Marjolijn Haasnoot * Delft

University of Technology, Faculty of Technology, Policy & Management, PO Box 5015, Delft, 2600 GA, The Netherlands Marjolijn Haasnoot * US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water

Resources, 7701 Telegraph Road, Alexandria, 22315, Virginia, USA Guillermo F. Mendoza * Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2 rue André-Pascal, Paris, 75775,

France Kathleen C. Dominique * National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, 1 Park Place, Annapolis, 21401, Maryland, USA Andres Baeza Authors * N. LeRoy Poff View author publications You

can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Casey M. Brown View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Theodore E. Grantham View

author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * John H. Matthews View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *

Margaret A. Palmer View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Caitlin M. Spence View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Robert L. Wilby View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Marjolijn Haasnoot View author publications You can also

search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Guillermo F. Mendoza View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Kathleen C. Dominique View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Andres Baeza View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS

N.L.P. and J.H.M. conceived the original project. N.L.P., T.E.G. and C.M.B. led the drafting of the text. C.M.S., C.M.B., T.E.G. and N.L.P. led the case study analysis. N.L.P, C.M.B.,

T.E.G., J.H.M, M.A.P., C.M.S., R.L.W., M.H., G.F.M., K.C.D. and A.B. contributed to the intellectual content through workshop participation and writing. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence

to N. LeRoy Poff. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Information

(PDF 1049 kb) RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Poff, N., Brown, C., Grantham, T. _et al._ Sustainable water management under future

uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. _Nature Clim Change_ 6, 25–34 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2765 Download citation * Received: 25 February 2015 * Accepted: 21

July 2015 * Published: 14 September 2015 * Issue Date: January 2016 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2765 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to

read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing

initiative