Play all audios:
_Elliott Witney files his last entry for Bridging Differences today. Deborah will respond on Thursday, and a new co-blogger will join her next week. _ Dear Deb, As we close our exchange, I
want to express gratitude for this opportunity. I’ve never done anything like this before, and I deeply appreciate your asking me to join this discussion. It has been particularly
interesting and exciting to discover how much we agree on. I also want to thank Emily Gasoi for introducing us. When Emily and I first met in my office to discuss our respective educational
philosophies, I pulled your book _In Schools We Trust_ off my bookshelf. I feel fortunate that she made this connection. In your last post, which I found to be particularly thought-provoking
and hopeful, you took issue with what I characterized as the “great progress” we have made by growing the number of high-quality public schools that serve young people from predominantly
low-income families. When I referenced “great progress,” I definitely didn’t mean to imply that I think we’re _there_ yet in the world of education. We still face stubborn race and
income-based achievement gaps. According the “A New Measure of Educational Success in Texas,” “only one in five (about 20 percent) 8th grade students enrolled in Texas public schools
completes any level of valid postsecondary credentialing (certificate or degree) within 11 years.” For African-American and Hispanic students, the percentages are even lower. While I stand
by my statement that we have many more top-notch public schools educating underserved kids than existed 25 years ago, I don’t believe that a successful classroom or school environment can be
easily mass-produced. In a given day, teachers make thousands of large and small decisions—from what to wear to how to welcome students to how to structure their classroom lesson to what
behaviors to address and which ones to ignore. The sum total of all those critical decisions helps to shape the unique identities of both classrooms and schools. Now that we have classrooms
and schools around the nation showing what’s possible, we are liberated to ask different questions. We no longer need to ask, “Is it possible?” All educators have been liberated by proof
that it is possible. We now can ask: “How?” I have vivid memories of the first time that I visited a prestigious independent K-12 school—one I grew to admire and return to many times over
the years. I observed 5th grade students tinkering with Lego robotics and 9th graders making musical instruments from wood during a physics class. My first reaction, to be completely honest,
was “Man, these kids are so lucky.” Then, I started to ask myself questions, including “How can I create this type of excellence at the school I lead?” I returned to KIPP Academy Houston
and asked our science department chairperson this question: “If money were no object, what would ‘world-class science’ look like at our school?” From there, we began a collaborative process
of revamping our entire middle school science offerings. Five years after asking this question, KIPP Academy now has a Science & Engineering Day with 8th graders racing mousetrap cars
and 7th graders competing to see whose Popsicle-stick bridges can sustain the most weight. KIPP Academy experienced a similar transformation when our faculty studied the rigor and frequency
of high-quality writing expected in elite independent schools. Once we asked ourselves, “How might we do something like this in our school,” we were able to raise the bar for what we
expected for student writing. Not much later, the level of thought and complexity in our average students’ writing at KIPP Academy far exceeded the norm from five years ago. Although we
still have a long way to go, we were able to raise the quality of student writing through changing our expectations and thinking differently about the “how.” I wanted to conclude with a
response to your question about scaling models in public education. Should your Mission Hill school and the school I led be replicated? Replication is really hard work, but it is definitely
possible. When I was principal of KIPP Academy, I had dozens of aspiring school founders complete one-month ‘residencies’ at my charter school. I have seen many of these educators go on to
create public schools that are as good as, if not better than, the KIPP Academy I ran. These school principals have been able to achieve this by building strong leadership teams, hiring and
nurturing talented teachers, and maintaining a culture of continuous improvement for children and adults. I also have observed whole school districts pursue system-wide excellence. Spring
Branch ISD in Houston (where I began working as an administrator last year) has adopted a single strategic goal and set of fundamental principles in the form of belief statements you will
find here. Our single goal—like the report mentioned above—helps us align what we do as a system to what we ultimately want to see for our children. Our beliefs provide the underlying
principles that help shape the entire system. We believe that a great public school system: builds on the strengths and gifts of each child; provides students from poverty the same
opportunities for success after high school as students from non-poverty homes; instills in every student the belief that they can achieve more than they think possible; and assures that
every adult in the system is committed to the successful completion of some form of higher education for every child. These beliefs guide everything in the system. Because we believe great
school systems build on the strengths and gifts of each child, for example, we have robust extracurricular offerings in the arts and athletics. Spring Branch even offers students rich career
and technical education programming through the Guthrie Center, including courses in agricultural science, forensic science, and the culinary arts. Just like I borrowed great ideas from
elite independent schools as a principal, I know your Mission Hill school has been a source of inspiration and innovation to educators all over the world—both for its programming and its
philosophical underpinnings. It is my sincere aspiration that our blog dialogue has helped open some people’s minds to what’s possible in public education. As awareness spreads about the
proof points of excellence in our nation’s public schools, I hope people will stop asking “Is it possible?” and start asking “How do we foster excellence?” My best, Elliott