ACLU, CCR Sue Obama Over “Targeted Killings”

ACLU, CCR Sue Obama Over “Targeted Killings”

Play all audios:

Loading...

The Obama administration seems to believe that the President has the authority to order the assassination of anyone, including American citizens, if they meet certain as-yet-undisclosed


criteria. One American, accused terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki, has been widely reported to be on a US government “kill list”—making him just one of several US citizens the government is


reportedly trying to kill without charge or trial.


On Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) sued the government to force a change to this policy. (Their client is Nasser al-Awlaki,


Anwar’s father.) The groups hope that a court will rule that non-judicial “targeted killing” off a battlefield like Iraq or Afghanistan “is illegal in all but the narrowest circumstances.”


They also hope to force the government to explain exactly how it decides to put US citizens like Awlaki on a government “kill list.” Here’s an excerpt of their press release (you can watch a


video version below):


“The United States cannot simply execute people, including its own citizens, anywhere in the world based on its own say-so,” said Vince Warren, Executive Director of CCR. “The law prohibits


the government from killing without trial or conviction other than in the face of an imminent threat that leaves no time for deliberation or due process. That the government adds people to


kill lists after a bureaucratic process and leaves them on the lists for months at a time flies in the face of the Constitution and international law.”


The groups charge that targeting individuals for execution who are suspected of terrorism but have not been convicted or even charged – without oversight, judicial process or disclosed


standards for placement on kill lists – also poses the risk that the government will erroneously target the wrong people. In recent years, the U.S. government has detained many men as


terrorists, only for courts or the government itself to discover later that the evidence was wrong or unreliable.


According to today’s legal complaint, the government has not disclosed the standards it uses for authorizing the premeditated and deliberate killing of U.S. citizens located far from any


battlefield. The groups argue that the American people are entitled to know the standards being used for these life and death decisions.


“A program that authorizes killing U.S. citizens, without judicial oversight, due process or disclosed standards is unconstitutional, unlawful and un-American,” said Anthony D. Romero,


Executive Director of the ACLU. “We don’t sentence people to prison on the basis of secret criteria, and we certainly shouldn’t sentence them to death that way. It is not enough for the


executive branch to say ‘trust us’ – we have seen that backfire in the past and we should learn from those mistakes.”


Unfortunately for the plaintiffs (and al-Awlaki himself), the lawsuit does not have much hope. (More on that here.) Unless the President himself changes his mind about targeted killings,


nothing much is likely to change. The executive branch has too many legal tools at its disposal—the “state secrets” privilege, the “wartime president” excuse, and so on—to lose a case like


this. So unless Barack Obama decides otherwise, the US is going to probably remain a country that can “simply execute people, including its own citizens, anywhere in the world based on its


own say-so.” Everyone’s comfortable with that, right? 


Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.


“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends


to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.


No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes


to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real


difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.


“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends


to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.


No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes


to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real


difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.


Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.


Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


Inexpensive, too! Subscribe today and get a full year of Mother Jones for just $19.95.


Award-winning photojournalism. Stunning video. Fearless conversations.


Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.


We’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth-telling investigations we’re known for don’t happen under corporate ownership. We shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report


the facts other media are afraid to touch.


The essential ingredient that makes this possible? Readers like you. Please stand with Mother Jones and make a donation today. These are dangerous times, and we’ve got a lot of hard,


consequential work to do. But we can’t do it without reader support.


We’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth-telling investigations we’re known for don’t happen under corporate ownership. We shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report


the facts other media are afraid to touch.


The essential ingredient that makes this possible? Readers like you. Please stand with Mother Jones and make a donation today. These are dangerous times, and we’ve got a lot of hard,


consequential work to do. But we can’t do it without reader support.