Play all audios:
With the new Consumer Finance Protection Bureau mere days from being created when Obama signs financial reform into law, the question of the day is: who’s going to head it up? The obvious
choice is Elizabeth Warren, who’s been its biggest champion from the very start. Annie Lowrey:
The idea for the CFPB is hers. She is, bar none, considered the foremost mind on the topic. As the head of the CFPB, many in Washington hoped, she would act not just as a strong leader, but
as a draw for smart minds — a kind of J. Edgar Hoover, sexing up the bureau rather than letting it become just another wan regulatory agency. This might sound a bit strong. But I am serious
in saying that most everyone I speak with about this issue — on the Hill, in consumer groups, in think tanks — considers Elizabeth Warren just that good.
But HuffPo’s Shahien Nasiripour says Warren has a problem: Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner doesn’t like her.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has expressed opposition to the possible nomination of Elizabeth Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, according to a source with
knowledge of Geithner’s views.
….It’s no secret the watchdog and the Treasury Secretary have had a tenuous relationship. Geithner’s critics have enjoyed watching Warren question him during his four appearances before her
panel. Her tough, probing questions on the Wall Street bailout and his role in it — often delivered with a smile — are featured on YouTube. One video is headlined “Elizabeth Warren Makes
Timmy Geithner Squirm.”
Well, maybe this source is right, maybe it isn’t. But I certainly find the whole thing plausible, and I also find it plausible that Barack Obama would be none too thrilled with a muckraking
CFPB director who has little managerial or government experience. That’s not really his no-drama style. What’s more, there’s no telling what kind of deal (if any) the White House made with
Sen. Ben Nelson over who they’d appoint.
But I will say this: right now the White House has a big problem with its base. Fair or not, the left wing of the party doesn’t believe that Obama either respects them or listens to them
much — and this is bad news for Democratic chances in the November midterms. Now, nominating Elizabeth Warren to head up the CFPB wouldn’t suddenly make everyone sing Kumbaya, but it would
sure go a long way toward patching things up. It would demonstrate, at least for a moment, that he’s paying attention to what his base wants, that he’s willing to take a chance, and that
he’s serious about the CFPB having a director who genuinely wants to protect consumers. And just to piss off the entire crew of Fox News, he could even send someone to announce her
nomination at Netroots Nation next week. The alternative, as Max Sawicky predicts, is to appoint “some banker d-bag.” Take your pick, Mr. President.
Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends
to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.
No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes
to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real
difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.
“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends
to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.
No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes
to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real
difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.
Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.
Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.
Inexpensive, too! Subscribe today and get a full year of Mother Jones for just $19.95.
Award-winning photojournalism. Stunning video. Fearless conversations.
Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
We’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth-telling investigations we’re known for don’t happen under corporate ownership. We shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report
the facts other media are afraid to touch.
The essential ingredient that makes this possible? Readers like you. Please stand with Mother Jones and make a donation today. These are dangerous times, and we’ve got a lot of hard,
consequential work to do. But we can’t do it without reader support.
We’re a nonprofit newsroom, because the truth-telling investigations we’re known for don’t happen under corporate ownership. We shine a bright light into the dark corners of power and report
the facts other media are afraid to touch.
The essential ingredient that makes this possible? Readers like you. Please stand with Mother Jones and make a donation today. These are dangerous times, and we’ve got a lot of hard,
consequential work to do. But we can’t do it without reader support.