Play all audios:
ABSTRACT THE EVOLUTION OF DIBRANCHIATE CEPHALOPODS.—Dr. J. Brock, in the last number of Gegenbaur's _Morphologisches Jahrbuch_ (vol. vi. p. 185), gives his reasons for dissenting from
von Ihering's conclusions on this subject. He has dissected spirit-preparations of many of the principal genera, and he discusses the evidence derived from the shell, the funnel, the
muscular system, the radula, the nervous system, and the vascular excretory and reproductive systems. Three anatomically well-marked phyla or groups of genera are made out, of which the
Œgopsidæ are the most ancient, and from this group the other two—the Myopsidæ and the Octopods—are derived. The Œgopsids he further divides into two groups—the Ommastrephidæ and the
Loligopsidæ, the comparative antiquity of which cannot yet be determined; they are of great interest because they both show important connections with the two other phyla. The Œgopsid forms
are primarily true Belemnites, and later developed into the Sepia type, from which stock also the decapods with simple horny shells sprang independently. The octopods, the most highly
differentiated phylum, but with an organisation showing a very early origin, and branching from the main type, afford some evidence of relationship to the type of Loligopsis, although they
cannot be regarded as having originated from them. Most probably they had a common origin from the primordial dibranchiate form with ten arms. Dr. Brock relies considerably on the oviduct
being double in the Œgopsidæ, and single (by reduction) in Myopsidæ; but unless he can support his theory by more developmental facts it can hardly attain sufficient credit for practical use
in classification. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution
Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full
article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs *
Contact customer support RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE _Biological Notes_ . _Nature_ 22, 277–278 (1880).
https://doi.org/10.1038/022277a0 Download citation * Issue Date: 22 July 1880 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/022277a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able
to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing
initiative