Play all audios:
ABSTRACT THE Institution of Mechanical Engineers held their summer meeting at Lincoln last week, under the presidency of Mr. Jeremiah Head, who, in his inaugural address, treated of the
relative advantages of iron and steel for the various purposes for which these metals are employed. The reasons why steel rails are now used almost to the exclusion of iron are that they can
be pro duced more cheaply, can be manufactured of equally good quality by either the Bessemer or Siemens process with either acid or basic-lined vessels and of almost any iron ore, and they
can better withstand abrasion, disintegra tion, or crushing under heavy rolling loads; for the same reasons steel tires are now almost universally employed. For _ship-building_ steel is
superior to iron, as, owing to its greater ductility, ships built of the former metal are able to outlive collisions and minor accidents that would be fatal to iron ships. As is well known,
owing to the superior tensile strength of steel, Lloyd's Committee agreed in 1877 to allow a reduction of 20 per cent, in weight of scantlings over iron, and in the thickness of plates;
Mr. Head argues that, considering a ship's plate is a broad girder, its strength diminishes as the square of the thickness, and that, therefore, although a steel ship would be superior
to an iron one of equal weight, an iron ship is likely to retain its form better than a steel one built 20 per cent, lighter. As regards _bridges and roofs_, the employment of iron or steel
depends mainly upon the size of the structure; for light edifices, owing to its greater cheapness, iron has hitherto been used, whilst for large spans, where the weight of the structure
itself is an important function, steel has been employed in the erection of bridges of spans which could not have been attempted if the engineer had been dependent on iron alone. For
_boilers_, except in the matter of corrosion, in which authorities seem to differ as to the resisting power of iron and steel, but appear to be rather favourable to the former, steel is
much, more advantageous.than iron, both on account of its being as cheap, and on account of a steam boiler of the same weight being able to withstand much higher pressures if made of steel
than if made of iron; hence boilers, and marine boilers particularly, are now scarcely ever built of iron. The President recommended the application of metal in the construction of the
frames of rolling stock and for railway-sleepers. As regards the continued use of wooden sleepers, there can be no question that “it is a form of waste that should be reprehended in the
public interest, just as should the use of coal for ballasting or other obviously wasteful purpose. The same timber which would become useless for sleepers in, say, nine years, would last at
least a century in the roof or flooring of a house.” Another argument advanced, and a most im portant one, is that the substitution of iron and steel for timber railway-sleepers would not
only give an enormous impetus to these industries while the substitution was being effected, but would permanently maintain a popu lation of 100,000, or 3 per cent, of the whole population
of the country, for renewals. ARTICLE PDF RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE _The Institution of Mechanical Engineers_ . _Nature_ 32,
343–345 (1885). https://doi.org/10.1038/032343d0 Download citation * Issue Date: 13 August 1885 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/032343d0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link
with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt
content-sharing initiative