Research Items | Nature

Research Items | Nature

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT MUMMIFICATION IN AUSTRALIA AND AMERICA.—Mr. Warren K. Dawson has published in the _Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute_, Vol. 58, Pt. 1, a study of the characteristic features of mummification as practised in Australia and America, based partly upon the published evidence, and partly upon a personal examination of such of the actual mummies or their photographs as are available—the latter a point of importance, as it has enabled the author to meet the contention, maintained by many writers, that mummification in South America is a result of natural causes, as it undoubtedly was in the early period in Egypt. In Australia the object of mummification was to secure the preservation of the body until the prolonged ceremonies after death had been completed. Hence it was necessary that the body should be portable owing to the frequent moving of the camp. The body was, therefore, preserved in a position which was often unnatural, the thighs sometimes being so far bent that the knees were forced behind the shoulders. Certain features which are meaningless in their context point to an introduced ritual. Such, for example, is the practice of mummification even when the corpse was destined for cremation or other form of destruction; the pains taken to remove the epidermis, though the whole of the body was afterwards burnt; the laying of the body on a roof-covered platform; and the painting of the body with redochre and the attempt to give it a life-like appearance by painting the shrunken eyes. In Egypt by the twenty-first dynasty an artificial eye of white stone with black inlay had superseded various experimental methods. In the Torres Straits artificial eyes resembling those of Egypt, sometimes cowrie shells, were employed. The Australians, lacking the necessary skill, sometimes packed the eyelid with cotton, indicating the pupil by a pigment. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Research Items. _Nature_ 122, 417–419 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/122417a0 Download citation * Issue Date: 15 September 1928 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/122417a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

ABSTRACT MUMMIFICATION IN AUSTRALIA AND AMERICA.—Mr. Warren K. Dawson has published in the _Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute_, Vol. 58, Pt. 1, a study of the characteristic


features of mummification as practised in Australia and America, based partly upon the published evidence, and partly upon a personal examination of such of the actual mummies or their


photographs as are available—the latter a point of importance, as it has enabled the author to meet the contention, maintained by many writers, that mummification in South America is a


result of natural causes, as it undoubtedly was in the early period in Egypt. In Australia the object of mummification was to secure the preservation of the body until the prolonged


ceremonies after death had been completed. Hence it was necessary that the body should be portable owing to the frequent moving of the camp. The body was, therefore, preserved in a position


which was often unnatural, the thighs sometimes being so far bent that the knees were forced behind the shoulders. Certain features which are meaningless in their context point to an


introduced ritual. Such, for example, is the practice of mummification even when the corpse was destined for cremation or other form of destruction; the pains taken to remove the epidermis,


though the whole of the body was afterwards burnt; the laying of the body on a roof-covered platform; and the painting of the body with redochre and the attempt to give it a life-like


appearance by painting the shrunken eyes. In Egypt by the twenty-first dynasty an artificial eye of white stone with black inlay had superseded various experimental methods. In the Torres


Straits artificial eyes resembling those of Egypt, sometimes cowrie shells, were employed. The Australians, lacking the necessary skill, sometimes packed the eyelid with cotton, indicating


the pupil by a pigment. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution


Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full


article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs *


Contact customer support RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Research Items. _Nature_ 122, 417–419 (1928). https://doi.org/10.1038/122417a0


Download citation * Issue Date: 15 September 1928 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/122417a0 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get


shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative