Play all audios:
Access through your institution Buy or subscribe Sir In his Correspondence 'Replacement of animals in research will never be possible' (_Nature_ 457, 147; 2009), Roberto Caminiti
makes a case for retaining the current breadth of medical research in using non-human primates. Although immense progress has been made from scientifically well-founded work on non-human
primates, I cannot agree with his contention that it will never be possible to replace these animals in research. This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn more Buy this article *
Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn
about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry,
King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK Bill Crum Authors * Bill Crum View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Contributions may be submitted to [email protected]. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Crum, B. It should be
possible to replace animals in research. _Nature_ 457, 657 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/457657b Download citation * Published: 04 February 2009 * Issue Date: 05 February 2009 * DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/457657b SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently
available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
