ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has been linked with pancreatic cancer risk; however, findings from epidemiological studies are inconsistent. METHODS: A

nested case–control study was conducted within the UK General Practice Research Database. Cases (_n_=1141) had a diagnosis of primary cancer of the exocrine pancreas between January 1995

and June 2006. Controls (_n_=7954) were matched with each case on general practice site, sex and year of birth. Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to generate odds ratios

(OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with NSAID use compared with non-use. RESULTS: Any use of NSAID in the 5 years before the index date or since entry into the database

use (5 years or more) of lower doses of NSAIDs OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.49–0.99). CONCLUSION: Long-term exposure to NSAIDs may be associated with a reduction in risk of pancreatic cancer. SIMILAR

CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS PANCREATIC CANCER IS ASSOCIATED WITH MEDICATION CHANGES PRIOR TO CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS Article Open access 28 April 2023 INVESTIGATING THE IMPACT OF STEROID

DEPENDENCE ON GASTROINTESTINAL SURGICAL OUTCOMES FROM UK BIOBANK Article Open access 25 November 2024 DIABETES MEDICATIONS AND CANCER RISK ASSOCIATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

OF EVIDENCE OVER THE PAST 10 YEARS Article Open access 22 July 2023 MAIN Pancreatic cancer is rapidly fatal and is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in the western world. (Jemal

et al, 2007) It is therefore important to identify aetiological and protective factors for this disease to improve primary prevention. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs),

especially aspirin, have been reported to reduce the risk of several cancers and some pre-malignant lesions, with risk reductions ranging from 20% to 50% for certain cancer sites

(Garcia-Rodriguez and Huerta-Alvarez, 2001; Khuder and Mutgi, 2001; Gonzalez-Perez et al, 2003; Abnet et al, 2009; Cole et al, 2009). However, despite biologically plausible mechanisms

whereby NSAIDs may prevent pancreatic cancer, the findings of epidemiologic studies are inconsistent (Schreinmachers and Everson, 1994; Coogan et al, 2000; Langman et al, 2000; Anderson et

al, 2002a; Menezes et al, 2002; Friis et al, 2003; Sorensen et al, 2003; Jacobs et al, 2004; Ratnasinghe et al, 2004; Schernhammer et al, 2004; Cook et al, 2005). In a recent meta-analysis

of these studies, the combined relative risk of pancreatic cancer in regular users of NSAIDs compared with non-regular or never users was 1.01 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.91–1.11)

(Larsson et al, 2006). The Women's Health Study randomised controlled trial reported similar null findings (Cook et al, 2005). The inconsistency between laboratory and epidemiological

evidence prompted us to examine the association between NSAIDs and pancreatic cancer risk in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD), particularly because most studies have been

undertaken within the US, (Capurso et al, 2007) where NSAIDs are used at higher doses and for longer durations than in the UK (Arellano et al, 2006). MATERIALS AND METHODS We undertook a

nested case–control study within the UK GPRD, which was established in 1987, and is the world's largest computerised database of anonymised longitudinal patient records from primary

care. It collects data from around 500 general practices in the UK, covers about 5.5% of the population and is broadly representative of the UK population (GPRD, 2009). Participating

practices follow protocols for the recording and transferring of computerised data to the research database (Hollowell, 1997). The data obtained are assessed in terms of completeness,

continuity and plausibility and are from general practices that meet predefined standards, registered as ‘up to standard’ (UTS) practices. GPRD data includes demographic information,

clinical diagnoses, referral information, specialty consultation notes, results of laboratory tests and hospital discharge information. Read and Oxford Medical Information System (OXMIS)

codes are used to classify medical diagnoses. The GPRD also contains details of all prescriptions issued for registered patients (Garcia Rodriguez and Perez Gutthann, 1998). The high quality

of GPRD prescription and diagnosis information has been documented (Jick et al, 1991; Jick et al, 1992; Van Staa and Abenhaim, 1994). Ethical approval for all observational research using

GPRD data has been obtained from a Multicentre Research Ethics Committee. The study included patients from UTS practices with diagnostic codes for primary pancreatic cancer, with a date of

diagnosis/index date (first recorded occurrence of a pancreatic cancer code) between January 1995 and June 2006; data were extracted from GPRD in February 2007. Patients aged 85 or older

were excluded, as were cases without at least 5 years of UTS data collection before the index date. Controls with no GPRD record of pancreatic cancer were selected using incidence density

sampling and matched to cases on year of birth, sex and general practice site. Controls also had at least 5 years of UTS data collection before their index date (date of pancreatic cancer

diagnosis in their matched case). Up to seven controls were matched for each case. Pancreatic cancer is difficult to conclusively diagnose without histological or cytological examination of

relevant specimens and these specimens are often not available. Pancreatic cancer may therefore be confused with primary malignancies in adjacent organs or with secondary tumours.

Histological confirmation was not available from GPRD as there was no routine linkage to cancer registries, at the time the data were obtained. To minimise misclassification, all cancer

codes recorded in the medical records of potential cases were reviewed. Only cases with consistently recorded pancreatic cancer codes were included. All other cases, for example patients

with codes for both pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma, or carcinoma of bile duct, gallbladder and so on, and their matched controls were excluded from the dataset; peri-ampullary

tumours were also excluded. Cases and controls with a prior history of cancer (at least a year before the index date) were identified by review of cancer codes and flagged as having a

previous cancer but were not excluded from the dataset. The primary exposure of interest was NSAID use in the 5 years before the index date, excluding the year before the index date. NSAID

use in the year before diagnosis was excluded because early cancer symptoms may have led to NSAID use during this period. NSAID use since entry into GPRD until a year before the index date

was also examined. Data were extracted on all NSAIDs prescribed for cases and controls. NSAID use was expressed in units of defined daily dose (DDD), a validated measure of drug consumption

maintained by the World Health Organisation (WHO). It is the assumed average maintenance dose per day of a drug used for its main indication in adults. (World Health Organisation Working

Group, 2008) As the DDD of a drug may be assumed to be functionally equivalent to the DDD of any other drug used for a similar purpose, DDDs may be used to compare or combine the usage of

drugs within and across pharmacological groups, for example all NSAIDs. The number of DDDs for each NSAID prescription issued was calculated by multiplying the dose prescribed by the

quantity given and dividing this by the DDD value assigned to that drug. For each time period under study, the total number of DDDs for each NSAID prescribed, for subgroups of NSAIDs

(aspirin and derivatives, high-dose aspirin (300 mg or more a day), fenamates, propionic acid derivatives, acetic acid derivatives, COX-2 inhibitors, oxicams or others), and for all NSAIDS

combined was calculated for each case and control. Cumulative duration of any NSAID use was calculated as the total number of intended days, during the periods under study, for which study

subjects were issued any prescription (at any dose) for NSAIDs. Total dose (DDDs) and total duration (days) of any NSAID use, in the periods under study, were categorised into approximate

quartiles, on the basis of total NSAID use within the controls. Exposure to any NSAID at any time before the index date, excluding the year before the index date, was further categorised

according to both dose and duration of use combined. The median number of DDDs, per day, of NSAID exposure in the controls during this period was one DDD per day, therefore low-dose NSAID

exposure was classified as the use of <1.0 DDD of NSAIDs per day and high dose as >1.0 DDDs per day. Categories for duration of low and high NSAID use were subsequently created: no use

or use for <1 year (0–365.3 days), use for 1–3 years (365.3–1095.8 days), use for 3–5 years (1095.8–1826.3 days) and use for 5 or more years (>1826.3) (Yang et al, 2007). STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% percent CIs for the associations between disease status and use of NSAIDs. Models were constructed

for ever/never use of all NSAIDs or subgroups of NSAIDs. Dose and duration of NSAID use was examined using continuous variables (output expressed per 200 DDDs and 200 days of use),

approximate quartiles of dose and duration of NSAID use and the combined dose and duration variable. NSAID use in the year before diagnosis was excluded in all analyses and models were

constructed relating to the 5-year period before diagnosis/index date and since entry into the GPRD. All analyses were adjusted for potential confounders including smoking status (unknown,

current smoker, non-smoker, ex-smoker), body mass index (BMI, unknown, underweight, normal, overweight, obese according to WHO categories) (World Health Organisation Working Group, 2009),

alcohol use (unknown, current drinker, lifelong non-drinker, ex-drinker), history of pancreatitis, history of rheumatoid arthritis, history of diabetes and history of cancer. For smoking,

alcohol use and BMI, we used the most recent record excluding those within the year before the index date and for history of diabetes, pancreatitis and cancer we also excluded events within

the year before the index date. We also adjusted for use of H2 antagonists (ever/never use) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs, ever/never use), systemic steroids (ever/never use), hormone

replacement therapy (HRT, ever/never use) and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs as use of these drugs may confound the association between NSAIDs and pancreatic cancer. Use of HRT and

steroids in the year before diagnosis was excluded. As there was a strong positive association between use of H2 antagonists and PPIs in the 2 years before diagnosis (presumably because of

cancer-associated symptoms) use of these drugs within this period was excluded. Data on the confounders were not available for all subjects and for those subjects for whom all data was

available, a restriction analyses was carried out. STATA Version 9 (Timberlake Consultants Ltd, London, UK) was used for all analyses. RESULTS Within the GPRD, 1361 pancreatic cancer cases

met the initial inclusion criteria and these were matched to 9487 controls. After review of cancer codes, 220 cases (16%) and their controls (1542, 9.4%) were excluded, leaving 1141

pancreatic cancer cases and 7954 matched controls. Each case had at least one matched control and >90% of cases had seven matched controls. The mean duration of UTS follow-up was 10.6

(s.d. 3.4) years, for both cases and controls. The mean age at database enrolment was also the same for cases and controls at 57.3 (s.d. 9.8) years; over 50% (53.7%) of all subjects were

male (Table 1). Any use of an NSAID in the 5 years before the index date or since entry into the GPRD (excluding the year before diagnosis) was not associated with risk of pancreatic cancer;

(OR) 95% CI, 0.96 (0.84–1.10) and 1.03(0.89–1.19), respectively (Data not shown). Any use of aspirin and its derivatives or high-dose aspirin in the 5 years before the index date was also

not associated with pancreatic cancer risk: ORs (95% CI), 0.95 (0.81–1.13) and 0.91 (0.61–1.35), respectively, and similar results were seen when use since entry into the GPRD was examined

(Table 2). Among subgroups of NSAIDs, risk of pancreatic cancer was lowest among users of COX-2 inhibitors and oxicams but the reductions in risk did not reach statistical significance;

adjusted ORs (95% CI), 0.80 (0.56–1.11) and 0.67 (0.43–1.03), respectively for use in the 5 years before diagnosis. Use of other subgroups of NSAIDs (acetic acid derivatives, fenamates,

propionic acid derivatives or other NSAIDs) was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk (Table 2). There was also no overall association between pancreatic cancer risk and the total dose

of NSAIDs used in the 5 years before the index date or since entry into the GPRD (excluding the year before diagnosis). The adjusted ORs (95% CI) for an increase in 200 DDDs of NSAIDs in

these two periods were 0.99 (0.94–1.03) and 0.99 (0.97–1.01), respectively (Data not shown). When the dose of NSAIDs was categorised according to use in controls (approximate quartiles) no

association was seen between dose category and pancreatic cancer risk (Table 3). There was an inverse association between pancreatic cancer risk and duration of NSAID use in the 5 years

before the index date. NSAID use for 773 days or more (approximately 2 years) in this period (excluding the year before the index date) was associated with a decrease in risk; adjusted ORs

(95% CI), 0.78 (0.62–0.97) (Table 4). No association was seen in the period since entry into the GPRD (Table 4). Results of the analysis that combined dose and duration of NSAID use since

entry into GPRD (excluding the year before the index date) are shown in Table 5. There was also some evidence in this analysis of reduced pancreatic cancer risk with long-term use (use for

1826.3 days or more) of lower doses of NSAIDs (<1 DDD a day); adjusted ORs (95% CI), 0.70 (0.49–0.99). DISCUSSION In this large population-based prospective study no significant

reductions in risk of pancreatic cancer were seen for ever compared with never use of an NSAID. There was also no overall association between risk and the total dose prescribed and no risk

reduction was seen among subjects who used the highest doses of NSAIDs. A 20% reduction in risk was seen among subjects who had been prescribed an NSAID for approximately 2 years or longer

in the 5 years before diagnosis and a 30% reduction in subjects who had used lower than average doses of NSAIDs for 5 years (1826.3 days) or more since entry into the GPRD. However, no

consistent pattern of reduced risk was seen with increasing dose, duration or combined dose and duration of NSAID use. Modest reductions in long-term users of higher doses of NSAIDs were

seen but were not statistically significant. Although chance and residual confounding may explain the latter findings, these data suggest that long-term use (>2 years) of NSAIDs (at

regular anti-inflammatory doses) may protect against pancreatic cancer and that duration of use may be more important than dose. Two recent meta-analyses found no association between

aspirin/NSAID use and pancreatic cancer. (Larsson et al, 2006; Capurso et al, 2007). Capurso et al (2007) reported pooled ORs (95% CI) for pancreatic cancer risk of 0.99 (0.83–1.19), 1.11

(0.84–1.47) and 1.09 (0.67–1.75) in low, intermediate and high aspirin/NSAID exposure groups, respectively (based on a combination of dose and duration). Duration of use was not examined

separately from dose in this meta-analysis. A previous study using the GPRD, which included fewer pancreatic cancer cases (513) than our study, reported an OR of 1.49 (1.02–2.18) for

patients receiving 7 or more prescriptions for NSAIDs in the 13–36 months before the diagnosis date of the case (Langman et al, 2000). This study may have comprised cases also included in

our analysis, but we believe our study was more rigorous as it examined both the dose and duration of NSAID exposure rather than the number of NSAID prescriptions issued; similarly, the UTS

follow-up time (a minimum of 5 years) and the median follow-up time (10.6 years) in our study were longer than in the earlier study (at least 3 years). Moreover, the risk estimates reported

in that study were adjusted only for age and smoking status, whereas we applied a comprehensive range of adjustments. Ever use of aspirin was not associated with pancreatic cancer risk in

our study, which is not unexpected as the majority of aspirin users (83%) used low-dose aspirin only (<300 mg) and data from cohort studies (Friis et al, 2003) and large trials have not

shown any decrease in pancreatic cancer risk in users of low-dose aspirin (Cook et al, 2005). Use of greater than five aspirin tablets per week (high dose, 325 mg) for 10 years or more in

the Nurses’ Health Study was associated with an increased the risk of pancreatic cancer compared with those who used aspirin for 1–5 years (Schernhammer et al, 2004). Data from the two large

randomised trials, with reliable post trial follow-up for more than 20 years, also suggested that high-dose aspirin may increase the risk of pancreatic cancer slightly (Flossmann et al,

2007). We did not see any increase in risk in subjects using high-dose aspirin but we were unable to assess risk in long-term users of high-dose aspirin as only 17% used this dose at any

time. Ever versus never use of COX-2 inhibitors and oxicams was associated with modest reductions in pancreatic cancer risk (20% and 30%, respectively) but statistical significance was not

achieved and too few subjects took these preparations to allow a more detailed analysis of use of these drugs. Trials of COX-2 inhibitors in patients with colorectal adenomas or previous

colorectal cancer have shown that these drugs can successfully prevent colorectal carcinogenesis (Arber et al, 2006; Baron et al, 2006; Bertagnolli et al, 2006) but adverse effects on

cardiovascular risk mean that they are also unlikely to be of benefit for the prevention of cancer, especially if a high-risk pre-malignant state is not clearly recognised (Lynch, 2006).

Meloxicam has been described as a preferential COX-2 inhibitor and as with piroxicam has shown inhibitory actions on human cancers (Ding et al, 2003; Naruse et al, 2006). This is the first

study to report on the use of oxicams and pancreatic cancer prevention and further analysis is warranted. This analysis has several key strengths, being the largest and most detailed of the

subject to date, allowing us to stratify the analyses by dose, duration and subgroup of NSAID. The use of prospectively collected prescription data avoids errors of recall and potential

recall bias associated with questionnaire-based measures of NSAID use. Moreover, all subjects in our study had at least 5 years of data available before diagnosis and data were available

before diagnosis for a mean of over 10 years. We also adjusted for all major confounders and, although data were not available for all subjects, the results of restriction analyses including

only those patients who had data on these confounders were not different from the main analyses. However, we cannot rule out residual confounding. We do not believe that confounding by

indication is a major problem within the study as indications for which NSAIDs are used are very varied and it is unlikely that each indication would have a common association with

pancreatic cancer risk. We attempted to address such confounding by adjusting for a history of rheumatoid arthritis, a common indication of chronic NSAID use; it made no difference to

observed ORs. This study has some limitations. Data on prescriptions issued may not reflect actual use of NSAIDs but there is no reason to believe that non-compliance with prescription

medication would differ systematically between cases and controls. No information was available on over-the-counter (OTC) NSAID use (including that from non-pharmacy outlets) but there is

little evidence of large-scale OTC purchasing of NSAIDs in the UK, especially in the middle aged and elderly. (Meier et al, 2002) Pancreatic cancer diagnoses were not validated and some

misclassification of diagnoses may have occurred within the GPRD system but we excluded very elderly subjects, in which diagnostic accuracy may be a particular problem; also, all cancer

codes were reviewed and cases with inconsistent coding were excluded. Furthermore, cancer diagnoses in GPRD appear to be a reliable record of incident cancer diagnoses and have been shown to

concord with original medical records in 95% of cases. (Jick et al, 1997) In summary, this study suggests that long-term use (>2 years) of NSAIDs may protect against pancreatic cancer

but replication of these findings is required. CHANGE HISTORY * _ 16 NOVEMBER 2011 This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as

noted at publication _ REFERENCES * Abnet CC, Freedman ND, Kamangar F, Leitzmann MF, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A (2009) Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of gastric and

oesophageal adenocarcinomas: results from a cohort study and a meta-analysis. _Br J Cancer_ 100: 551–557 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Anderson KE, Johnson TW, Lazovich D, Folsom AR

(2002a) Association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the incidence of pancreatic cancer. _J Natl Cancer Inst_ 94: 1168–1171 Article  Google Scholar  * Arber N, Eagle CJ,

Spicak J, Racz I, Dite P, Hajer J, Zavoral M, Lechuga MJ, Gerletti P, Tang J, Rosenstein RB, Macdonald K, Bhadra P, Fowler R, Wittes J, Zauber AG, Solomon SD, Levin B (2006) Celecoxib for

the prevention of colorectal adenomatous polyps. _N Engl J Med_ 355: 885–895 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Arellano F, Yood M, Wentworth C, Oliveria S, Rivero E, Verma A, Rothman K (2006)

Use of cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors (COX-2) and prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) in UK and USA populations. Implications for COX-2 cardiovascular profile.

_Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf_ 15: 861–872 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Baron JA, Sandler RS, Bresalier RS, Quan H, Riddell R, Lanas A, Bolognese JA, Oxenius B, Horgan K, Loftus S, Morton

DG, APPROVe Trial Investigators (2006) A randomized trial of rofecoxib for the chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas. _Gastroenterology_ 131: 1674–1682 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Bertagnolli MM, Eagle CJ, Zauber AG, Redston M, Solomon SD, Kim K, Tang J, Rosenstein RB, Wittes J, Corle D, Hess TM, Woloj GM, Boisserie F, Anderson WF, Viner JL, Bagheri D, Burn J, Chung

DC, Dewar T, Foley TR, Hoffman N, Macrae F, Pruitt RE, Saltzman JR, Salzberg B, Sylwestrowicz T, Gordon GB, Hawk ET, APC Study Investigators (2006) Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic

colorectal adenomas. _N Engl J Med_ 355: 873–884 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Capurso G, Schunemann HJ, Terrenato I, Moretti A, Koch M, Muti P, Capurso L, Delle Fave G (2007)

Meta-analysis: the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pancreatic cancer risk for different exposure categories. _Aliment Pharmacol Ther_ 26: 1089–1099 Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Cole BF, Logan RF, Halabi S, Benamouzig R, Sandler RS, Grainge MJ, Chaussade S, Baron JA (2009) Aspirin for the chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas: meta-analysis of the

randomized trials’. _J Natl Cancer Inst_ 101: 256–266 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Coogan PF, Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Strom BL, Zauber AG, Stolley PD, Shapiro S (2000) Non steroidal

Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Risk of digestive cancers at sites other than the Large Bowel. _Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev_ 9: 119–123 CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Cook NR, Lee IM,

Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Buring JE (2005) Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: the Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial.

_JAMA_ 294: 47–55 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ding H, Han C, Gibson-D’Ambrosio R, Steele VE, D’Ambrosio SM (2003) Piroxicam selectively inhibits the growth of premalignant and malignant

human oral cell lines by limiting their progression through the S phase and reducing the levels of cyclins and AP-1. _Int J Cancer_ 107: 830–836 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Flossmann E,

Rothwell PM (2007) Effect of aspirin on long-term risk of colorectal cancer: consistent evidence from randomised and observational studies. _Lancet_ 369: 1603–1613 Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Friis S, Sorensen HT, McLaughlin JK, Johnsen SP, Blot WJ, Abbate R, Olsen JH (2003) A population-based cohort study of the risk of colorectal and other cancers among users of low

dose aspirin. _Br J Cancer_ 88: 684–688 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Garcia Rodriguez LA, Perez Gutthann S (1998) Use of the UK General Practice Research Database for

pharmacoepidemiology. _Br J Clin Pharmacol_ 45: 419–425 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Huerta-Alvarez C (2001) Reduced risk of colorectal cancer among long-term users

of aspirin and nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. _Epidemiology_ 12: 88–93 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Gonzalez-Perez A, Garcia Rodriguez LA, Lopez-Ridaura R (2003) Effects

of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cancer sites other than the colon and rectum: a meta-analysis. _BMC cancer_ 3: 28–40 Article  Google Scholar  * GPRD (2009). 07/2009-last update_,

GPRD Bibliography_ [homepage of GPRD], [online]. Available: http://www.gprd.com/bibliography/ [15/12/2009] * Hollowell J (1997) The General Practice Research Database: quality of morbidity

data. _Popul Trends_ 87: 36–40 Google Scholar  * Jacobs EJ, Connell CJ, Rodriguez C, Patel AV, Calle EE, Thun MJ (2004) Aspirin use and pancreatic cancer mortality in a large United States

cohort. _J Natl Cancer Inst_ 96: 524–528 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, XU J, Thun M (2007) Cancer statistics 2007. _CA Cancer J Clin_ 57: 43–66 Article

  Google Scholar  * Jick H, Jick SS, Derby LE (1991) Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom. _Br Med J (Clin Res

Ed)_ 302: 766–768 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Jick H, Jick SS, Derby LE, Vasilakis C, Myers M, Meier C (1997) Calcium channel blockers and risk of cancer. _Lancet_ 349: 525–528 Article 

CAS  Google Scholar  * Jick H, Terris BZ, Derby LE, Jick SS (1992) Further validation of information recorded on a general practicioner based computerised data resource in the United

Kingdom. _Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf_ 1: 347–349 Article  Google Scholar  * Khuder S, Mutgi A (2001) Breast Cancer and NSAID use a meta-analysis. _Br J Cancer_ 84: 1118–1192 Article  Google

Scholar  * Langman MJ, Cheng KK, Gilman EA, Lancashire RJ (2000) Effect of anti-inflammatory drugs on overall risk of common cancer: case-control study in general practice research database.

_Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)_ 320: 1642–1646 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Larsson SC, Giovannucci E, Bergkvist L, Wolk A (2006) Aspirin and Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the

risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta analysis. _Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev_ 15: 2561–2564 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lynch P (2006) Is the demonstration of adenoma reduction with

rofecoxib a pyrrhic victory? _Gastroenterology_ 131: 2003–2005 Article  Google Scholar  * Meier CR, Schmitz S, Jick H (2002) Association between acetaminophen or nonsteroidal

antiinflammatory drugs and risk of developing ovarian, breast, or colon cancer. _Pharmacotherapy_ 22: 303–309 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Menezes RJ, Huber KR, Mahoney MC, Moysich KB

(2002) Regular use of aspirin and pancreatic cancer risk. _BMC Public Health_ 2: 18–24 Article  Google Scholar  * Naruse T, Nishida Y, Hosono K, Ishiguro N (2006) Meloxicam inhibits

osteocarcoma growth, invasiveness and metastasis by cox-2 dependent and independent routes. _Carcinogenesis_ 27: 584–592 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ratnasinghe L, Graubard B, Kahle L,

Tangrea J, Taylor P, Hawk E (2004) Aspirin use and mortality from cancer in a prospective cohort study. _Anticancer Res_ 24: 3177–3184 PubMed  Google Scholar  * Schernhammer ES, Kang J, Chan

AT, Michaud DS, Skinner HG, Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS (2004) A prospective study of aspirin use and the risk of pancreatic cancer in women. _J Natl Cancer Inst_ 96: 22–28 Article

  CAS  Google Scholar  * Schreinmachers D, Everson R (1994) Aspirin use and lung, colon and breast cancer incidence in a prospective study. _Epidemiology_ 5: 138–146 Article  Google Scholar

  * Sorensen HT, Friis S, Norgard B, Mellemkjaer L, Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Ekbom A, Baron JA (2003) Risk of cancer in a large cohort of nonaspirin NSAID users: a population-based study. _Br

J Cancer_ 88: 1687–1692 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Van Staa T, Abenhaim L (1994) The quality of information recorded on a UK Database of Primary Care Records: a study of

hospitalizations due to hypoglycaemia and other conditions. _Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf_ 3: 15–21 Article  Google Scholar  * World Health Organisation Working Group (2009). 23/03-last

update_, Global Database on Body Mass Index: BMI Classification_ [homepage of World Health Organisation], [online]. Available: http://www.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html

[06/01/2009] * World Health Organisation Working Group (2008). 14/08/2008-last update, About the ATC/DDD system. Available: http://www.whocc.no/atcddd/atcsystem.html [25/01/2009] * Yang YX,

Hennessy S, Propert K, Hwang WT, Sedarat A, Lewis JD (2007) Chronic proton pump inhibitor therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer. _Gastroenterology_ 133: 748–754 Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study is based in part on data from the Full Feature General Practice Research Database obtained under licence from the UK Medicines and

Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. However, the interpretation and conclusions contained in this study are those of the authors alone. Access to the GPRD database was funded through the

Medical Research Council's licence agreement with MHRA. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research Group, Centre for Public Health,

Queen's University, Mulhouse Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland, UK M C Bradley, M M Cantwell & L J Murray * Clinical and Practice Research

Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK M C Bradley & C M Hughes * Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Mulhouse

Building, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland, UK G Napolitano Authors * M C Bradley View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * C M Hughes View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * M M Cantwell View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed

 Google Scholar * G Napolitano View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * L J Murray View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to L J Murray. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative

Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Reprints and permissions ABOUT

THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Bradley, M., Hughes, C., Cantwell, M. _et al._ Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pancreatic cancer risk: a nested case–control study. _Br J Cancer_

102, 1415–1421 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605636 Download citation * Received: 25 January 2010 * Revised: 05 March 2010 * Accepted: 09 March 2010 * Published: 06 April 2010 *

Issue Date: 27 April 2010 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605636 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative KEYWORDS * NSAIDs * aspirin *

pancreatic cancer * GPRD