Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Although exposure to environmental stress is common in most populations, and the physiological effects of stress on individuals are well studied, the evolutionary importance of
stress to populations is not well understood. To address multitrait responses to environmental change and potential constraints on character evolution, we analysed, in 100 isofemale lines of
_Drosophila buzzatii_, the genetic relationships between resistance to a short heat shock and several life-history traits: survival in benign conditions, larval developmental time,
fecundity and longevity. Estimates of heritability of larval thermotolerance were low, but significant, and all life-history traits varied significantly among isofemale lines. Several of
these traits covaried significantly. Most correlations indicated positive life-history relationships, but males and females from lines where female fecundity was higher developed more slowly
in the absence of stress, which is a negative life-history relationship. The stress reduced or negated many trait associations, and showed one additional relationship; more larvae from
lines that developed fast at 25°C survived to adult after stress than did larvae from slow developing lines. These shifts in fitness relationships, when a single stress bout is applied,
suggest that even small increases in environmental stress can have profound effects on evolutionary relationships among life-history traits. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS RAPID
SEASONAL CHANGES IN PHENOTYPES IN A WILD _DROSOPHILA_ POPULATION Article Open access 19 December 2023 EVOLUTION OF CROSS-TOLERANCE IN _DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER_ AS A RESULT OF INCREASED
RESISTANCE TO COLD STRESS Article Open access 14 November 2022 A LIFE-HISTORY ALLELE OF LARGE EFFECT SHORTENS DEVELOPMENTAL TIME IN A WILD INSECT POPULATION Article 13 November 2023
INTRODUCTION Heterogeneity in the environment can increase genetic variation (Hedrick, 1986), but empirical evidence for this is sometimes contradictory (Hoffmann & Parsons, 1997; Sgro
& Hoffmann, 1998). We need to identify how specific changes in the environment can quantitatively affect variation in multiple traits. To do this, studies must include defined
environmental perturbations. Altering temperature provides one possible means to reach this goal, because many traits vary with the thermal environment (David et al., 1983), performance
declines rapidly when temperatures reach some threshold above which stress ensues (Huey & Bennett, 1990), and temperatures that cause stress are environmentally relevant for many
organisms, including _Drosophila_ (Feder, 1996). Furthermore, some molecular changes induced by stress are perhaps better understood than are their functional effects on the phenotype;
exposure to short-term heat stress causes a sharp increase in the concentration of specific ‘heat-shock’ proteins (Hsps), and down-regulation of many others (Parsell & Lindquist, 1993;
Johnston & Bennett, 1996; Bijlsma & Loeschcke, 1997), a process often called the heat-shock response. These regulatory changes increase thermotolerance yet minimally alter patterns
of growth (Solomon et al., 1991). Thermotolerance is a plastic trait, however, which is induced by exposure to a nonlethal temperature, and it may impose costs both on rate of development
and on fecundity (Krebs & Loeschcke 1994; Coleman et al., 1995; Hoffmann, 1995). Indeed, the ability to become more thermotolerant and specifically to express higher quantities of one
heat-shock protein can reduce larval survival to adulthood in _Drosophila melanogaster_ (Krebs & Feder, 1997a,b). In contrast, unexpected benefits can be found to be associated with the
thermotolerant phenotype, as when the induction of thermotolerance and a higher concentration of one heat-shock protein, Hsp70 in _D. melanogaster_, increase adult longevity (Tatar et al.,
1997). Therefore, genetic variation in induction of the stress response may, in part, underlie physiological relationships among life-history traits. We examined cross-environment
correlations among traits in larval and in adult _D. buzzatii_ that were either exposed or not exposed to a single bout of heat stress. This species is widely distributed in hot environments
where it feeds and breeds in necroses of prickly pear cactus. To obtain sufficient numbers of individuals to test multitrait genetic relationships, 100 recently collected isofemale lines
were maintained at low density (≈10–15 adults in each of four vials) and were tested for each trait. Multi-vial rearing techniques are recommended by Latter & Mulley (1995) to delay
changes associated with laboratory adaptation, and thereby to preserve the original variation and to minimize the consequences of inbreeding, which are minor during the first five
generations when rearing isofemale lines (Hoffmann & Parsons, 1988). Trait assays therefore began, after just three laboratory generations, with an analysis of heritability for adult
thermotolerance (results presented in Krebs & Loeschcke, 1997), and then proceeded with genetic analyses of larval thermotolerance, larva-to-adult survival in the absence of stress and
developmental time both after a high temperature treatment and under benign conditions (generation 5). The experiments on trait correlations then concluded with assays of early life
fecundity (generation 7) and longevity (generation 8). MATERIALS AND METHODS Collection and rearing methodologies of the Tenerife _D. buzzatii_ lines used here were reported earlier (Krebs
& Loeschcke, 1997) in a study of adult thermotolerance. The 100 isofemale lines, each derived from one male and one virgin female, were split into sets of 25 lines for independent but
concurrent analyses that were separated temporally by 3–5 days to facilitate maintenance and experimental handling. Therefore, any day-to-day variation that might have affected results on
flies treated at different times could be identified from differences among these independent sets of lines. LARVAL SURVIVAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL TIME To assay stress resistance of _D.
buzzatii_ larvae, we harvested eggs on a yeast paste medium from about 100 fourth generation adults from each line. The following day, eggs were rinsed of yeast and placed in a Petri dish
with agar until hatching (≈34 h after being laid), and 40 1–2 h-old larvae were transferred to each of eight vials per line, where possible. A few lines produced insufficient numbers of
larvae. Larvae in four of these replicates per line developed at a constant 25°C (no stress), and four others were exposed to a stress of 39°C for 6 h after 24 h development, and then
completed development to the adult stage at a constant 25°C. Larvae therefore received this heat treatment as late first-instars or early second-instars. The number of adults emerging from
each vial was recorded daily to quantify developmental time and survival, and each vial became the unit of replication for statistical analysis. EARLY FECUNDITY Virgin females were collected
for each line. After 3 days at 25°C, eight females from each line were isolated individually in a food vial with two males obtained from a mass population created previously from these same
lines. These flies were subsequently transferred to new food vials after 2 days and were then discarded after 2 additional days. The 6 cm3 Carolina Instant Drosophila medium (+8 mL water)
that we used is sufficient to rear more offspring than one female could produce over two days. Total emergence numbers therefore provided an estimate of early life fecundity per female, and
the average for the eight females gave an estimate for each line. ADULT LONGEVITY Separately for all lines, 10 replicate vials were collected, each containing 10 males and 10 females at
1-day of age (for a total of 100 males and 100 females per line), and maintained at a constant 25°C. Mortality was assessed twice weekly, either on Monday and Thursday, or on Tuesday and
Friday, determined by the set of vials, at which time flies were transferred to fresh vials of food. We repeated this procedure until all flies died. ANALYSIS The overall design compared
variation in seven traits: larval survival and developmental time at a constant 25°C, these same traits after exposure to a thermal stress treatment, adult survival after heat stress
(results from Krebs & Loeschcke, 1997), fecundity at 25°C and longevity at 25°C. All analyses were repeated in four independent sets of 25 randomly drawn isofemale lines, from which the
means were estimated for heritability of larval thermotolerance and for each correlation between traits. Gender effects were separated in all results except fecundity of adult females. Thus
correlation analyses compared traits measured for same-sex individuals, except for comparisons involving female fecundity. Not all comparisons were strictly independent, however, because
within each replicate males and females shared a common larval rearing environment, and males and females were housed together in the longevity analysis. The genetic basis of stress
resistance can be quantified from a mixed-model ANOVA (Hoffmann & Parsons, 1988; Krebs & Loeschcke, 1997). For survival and developmental time, the statistical interaction between
the fixed treatment effect, stress vs. nonstress, and the random line effect estimate variation in the response of larvae to stress (Barker, 1992). The additive genetic component of variance
(_S_2A) is then computed as the interaction mean square minus MSE, all divided by the replicate number (_k_=4). The intraclass correlation then is _S_2A/(_S_2A + MSE), from which _H_ and
_h_2 are determined after accounting for the effect of group size within each vial (Hoffmann & Parsons, 1988). RESULTS This study observed the effect of heat stress on the relationships
among six variables: survival and developmental time of larvae after heat shock, and, at a constant 25°C, larva-to-adult survival, larval developmental time, adult female fecundity, and
adult longevity. These six variables also were compared with adult thermotolerance data, which was measured in these lines two generations earlier than was larval thermotolerance (Krebs
& Loeschcke, 1997). The heat shock reduced larva-to-adult survival at 25°C from 65.7 _±_ 6.8%, to 34.0 _±_ 7.6%. Stress also lengthened developmental time by about 6 h (0.28 of a day),
from a mean of 14.35 _±_ 0.19 days at a constant 25°C to 14.62 _±_ 0.11 days for the larvae emerging after the heat shock. This time difference did not significantly exceed the duration of
the stress exposure. GENETIC ANALYSIS OF THERMOTOLERANCE Tolerance of larvae to heat shock varied genetically (Table 1). Significantly positive treatment by line effects, from which additive
components of variance are derived, were found in sets one, two and three, but not in set four, although this interaction was significant for developmental time in this fourth set.
Combining all lines together, where each group of 25 lines was nested within a variable set, similarly indicated significance of the treatment × line interaction (_F_93,511=6.55, _P_ <
0.001, for survival and _F_93,463=3.67, _P_ < 0.001, for developmental time). Separating results by set enabled replicate estimation of variance components and heritability (_h_2), and
therefore computation of parametric confidence limits around each estimate, rather than reliance on a theoretical variance determined from the sample size. The mean _h_2 for survival was
0.015 with a 95% confidence interval lower limit of 0.003 and an upper limit of 0.027; for developmental time, the mean _h_2 was 0.034 and the 95% confidence interval had lower and upper
limits of 0.001 and 0.068, respectively. However, two potential biases exist that may cause overestimation of these heritability estimates. The first is that these calculations of _S_2A from
isofemale lines did not partition dominance and epistatic components of variation. Where dominance and epistasis are not explicitly estimated, part of the variation caused by these effects,
if present, may add to the estimate of _S_2A and part may add to the environmental variance. The second potential bias is that components of variance used to estimate heritability for both
survival and developmental time are constrained to zero as a lower limit. Consequently, averages among groups (Table 1) were calculated only from positive and zero values. Variation within
lines increased significantly following the stress treatment (Table 2); for survival in all four sets, and for developmental time in all but set 4, the MSE increased significantly after
stress (by _F_-tests of variance, _P_<0.05). By contrast, among-line variation remained similar between treatments (variation twice was higher among lines after stress than in its
absence, but in the other two groups, higher variation among lines occurred in the nonstress treatment). The consequence of the higher within-line variation after stress was that
significance of the among-line effect was limited to the nonstress group (Table 2), but, because among-line variation was not lost, tests of correlation coefficients among variables with and
without stress compare trait means that vary similarly among lines. Lines of _D. buzzatii_ also varied significantly in fecundity and longevity at a constant 25°C. Because these traits were
measured after more than five generations in the laboratory, variance components cannot be estimated accurately. However, little research exists on longevity in _Drosophila_ species other
than _D. melanogaster_, and therefore Appendix 1 provides a life table for _D. buzzatii_ at 25°C that includes standard errors among lines for each estimated value. All standard measurements
of longevity were highly correlated, and therefore we presented mean life span in the correlation analyses among traits. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AMONG TRAITS Correlation analyses among the
seven traits produced 21 coefficients, or twice this number given separate analyses for females and males. However, a single experiment-wide test on these data is unduly conservative,
because genetic correlations between life-history traits are predicted not to be high. Instead, correlation coefficients are presented whenever results were consistent in males and females,
and where either one coefficient was significant at _P_ < 0.05 and/or where the combined probability across genders was significant (Fig. 1). Seven comparisons satisfied these criteria.
Four of the seven correlations that were largest in magnitude involved larval developmental time at 25°C. Three coefficients that involved developmental time were positive (as a fitness
relationship), those with survival and with developmental time after larval heat shock and with adult longevity, but shorter developmental time associated with smaller fecundity rates (short
developmental time is considered a fitness advantage relative to slow development, and therefore the sign of the relationship for all coefficients involving developmental time in Fig. 1
were reversed to reflect fitness correlations rather than the purely numerical relationships using the raw results). Higher survivorship at 25°C also associated with reduced fecundity, and
adult longevity and survival after larval heat-shock correlated significantly and positively. However, these last two relationships occurred predominantly in data of only males or only
females, and were weak in the other gender. Coefficients with adult thermotolerance were not significant in any test for correlation among traits. DISCUSSION The response of larvae to heat
is heritable, but the largest estimate of heritability for survival following heat shock was 0.030, whereas that for the delay induced in developmental time showed a maximum of 0.068 within
the four independent sets of lines. Lower limits for these heritabilities approached zero for both traits, which indicates a wide range of low possible values, similar to that found for
adult thermotolerance (Krebs & Loeschcke, 1997). However, these results in larvae may be conservative because we assumed complete density dependence when accounting for variation caused
by different numbers of flies emerging from vials, because a density-dependent model of within-line variance was empirically demonstrated in assays of adult thermotolerance (Krebs &
Loeschcke, 1997). With complete density-dependent effects, the within-line variance is multiplied by the group size to estimate the intraclass correlation (Hoffmann & Parsons, 1988),
but, if incorrect, the intraclass correlation and all values derived from it will be underestimated. In contrast to our thermotolerance measures, fecundity, longevity, and developmental time
(as traits themselves, rather than their changes in response to heat) typically show much higher estimates of heritability under controlled laboratory conditions (Rose & Charlesworth,
1981). Because data on these traits came after more than five laboratory generations, and inbreeding or drift in this time may bias between-line variance components (Hoffmann & Parsons,
1988), heritabilities were not estimated for them. However, the correlation coefficients that included fecundity, longevity and particularly developmental time, where several significant
effects occurred (Fig. 1), remain qualitatively robust. Developmental time at 25°C predominated within a complex set of interactions with the other life-history traits. Most relationships
were positive, but fecundity correlated negatively with developmental time and with survival. In contrast, genetic relationships between developmental time of _D. buzzatii_ larvae that
survived the stress appeared much smaller, and only the cross-environment correlation with developmental time at 25°C remained significant. Larval survival showed no cross-environment
relationship, and adult thermotolerance did not covary with any of the traits measured here, nor with adult metabolic rate (Loeschcke et al., 1997). However, the heat stress revealed one new
association between traits. Larvae in lines that developed faster at 25°C survived the stress in higher proportions, a positive relationship across these two environments. By using large
sample sizes, tests for correlations were powerful, and as shown previously by Krebs & Feder (1997a), these isofemale-line techniques adequately assess relationships with threshold
traits like survival. Therefore, lack of correlations and/or their disappearance after treatment are attributable to the stress. In fact, previous comparisons among populations of _D.
buzzatii_ support the results found here. As in the isofemale lines, larval and adult stress tolerance varied greatly among populations, but thermotolerance between stages was unrelated
(Krebs & Loeschcke, 1995). Coyne et al. (1983) similarly found that for seven _D. pseudoobscura_ populations, relative tolerance differed between the adult and pupal stages. Population
studies on _D. buzzatii_ also agree for the association between shorter larva-to-adult developmental time at 25°C and higher larval thermotolerance as measured by survival (Krebs &
Loeschcke, 1995), a result independently obtained after selection on thermotolerance (Loeschcke & Krebs, 1996). Perhaps shorter developmental time contributes to higher larval resistance
after heat stress because a higher metabolic rate facilitates more rapid acclimation to the rise in temperature. Hard evidence of a mechanism, unfortunately, does not exist. Although the
genes underlying most life-history traits are unknown, physiological stress can quantitatively change genetic correlations among these traits (Hoffmann & Parsons, 1991). One potential
mechanism for this change is that stress reveals hidden variation by breaking down homeostatic processes (Neyfakh & Hartl, 1993). Rutherford & Lindquist (1998) propose that stress
may also overwhelm developmental buffers, because many mutant alleles, which have no effect on the phenotype under normal conditions because of canalization, may contribute to variation in
development after molecular chaperones like Hsp90 are shunted to other duties within the cell. That heat stress increased environmental (within-line) variance more than additive genetic
(between-line) variance, is compatible with a model where stress imposes stochastic affects on homeostasis among individuals of all families. This result also indicates why the influence of
environmental heterogeneity, even when the environmental change is a single heat shock, is difficult to predict: heritabilities may either increase or decrease, depending on the relative
change in the genetic and environmental components of variance. Although these experiments demonstrate several significant trait correlations, one negative coefficient expected was not
strongly observed in _D. buzzatii_, that between fecundity and longevity. This trade-off is one of the best established negative life-history relationships in _D. melanogaster_ (Partridge
& Fowler, 1992; references therein). Although inbreeding, or line variation for a nonspecific advantage in the novel laboratory environment, can mask trade-offs (Service & Rose,
1985), the rapid analysis of each trait soon after originating the lines and the low-density rearing largely reduced this problem, as predicted (Latter & Mulley, 1995). Furthermore,
larval developmental time and survival at 25°C both correlated negatively with fecundity, which provides strong support that these potential confounding effects were minimized. Thus, we may
conclude that, in _D. buzzatii_, fecundity and longevity associate only indirectly through developmental time. Likewise, larval thermotolerance and survival in the absence of stress showed
no relationship, although the two traits were found to be negatively correlated in _D. melanogaster_ when isofemale line methods were also used (Krebs & Feder, 1997a). Our results
demonstrate that stress alters covariance patterns among traits, as may other forms of habitat variation (Kirkpatrick, 1996). The task for the future is to clarify how these puzzling shifts
in genetic relationships occur. One approach is to identify the underlying physiological responses to change. For thermal stress, analysis of Hsp70 is paying dividends. Variation in Hsp70
expression affects thermotolerance in _D. melanogaster_ (Feder et al., 1996; Dahlgaard et al., 1998) and _D. buzzatii_ (Loeschcke & collaborators, unpublished data). Variation in Hsp70
expression also may affect survival and developmental time (Krebs & Feder, 1997b) and, surprisingly, longevity in _D. melanogaster_ (Tatar et al., 1997). Therefore, that stress may alter
trade-offs and other trait associations, and the potential for Hsp70 variation to underlie these changes, opens the door for investigation of the actual genes that may control variation in
life-history traits, particularly in populations that experience environmental extremes. REFERENCES * Barker, J. S. F. (1992). Genetic variation in cactophilic _Drosophila_ for oviposition
on natural yeast substrates. _Evolution_. 46: 1070–1083. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Bijlsma, R., Loeschcke, V. (eds) (1997). _Environmental Stress, Adaptation and Evolution_.
Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel. * Coleman, J. S., Heckathorn, S. A. and Hallberg, R. L. (1995). Heat-shock proteins and thermotolerance: linking ecological and molecular perspectives. _Trends Ecol
Evol_, 10: 305–306. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Coyne, J. A., Bundgaard, J. and Prout, T. (1983). Geographic variation of tolerance to environmental stress in _Drosophila
pseudoobscura_. _Am Nat_, 122: 474–488. Article Google Scholar * Dahlgaard, J., Loeschcke, V., Michalak, P. and Justesen, J. (1998). Acclimation, thermal resistance and associated
expression of the heat-shock protein, Hsp70, in adult _Drosophila melanogaster_. _Funct Ecol_, 12: 786–793. Article Google Scholar * David, J. R., Allemand, R., van Herrewege, J. and
Cohet, Y. (1983). Ecophysiology: abiotic factors. In: Ashburner, M. Carson, H. L. and Thompson, J. R., Jr. (eds). _The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila_ VOL. 3D, pp. 105–170. Academic
Press, London. * Feder, M. E. (1996). Ecological and evolutionary physiology of stress proteins and the stress response: the _Drosophila melanogaster_ model. In: Johnston, I. A. and Bennett,
A. F. (eds). _Phenotypic and Evolutionary Adaptations to Temperature_ pp. 79–102. SEB Seminar Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. * Feder, M. E., Cartaño, N. V., Milos, L.,
Krebs, R. A. and Lindquist, S. L. (1996). Effect of engineering _Hsp70_ copy number on Hsp70 expression and tolerance of ecologically relevant heat shock in larvae and pupae of _Drosophila
melanogaster_. _J Exp Biol_, 199: 1837–1844. CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Hedrick, P. W. (1986). Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. _Ann Rev Ecol Syst_, 7: 1–32. Article
Google Scholar * Hoffmann, A. A. (1995). Acclimation: increasing survival at a cost. _Trends Ecol Evol_, 10: 1–2. Article Google Scholar * Hoffmann, A. A. and Parsons, P. A. (1988). The
analysis of quantitative variation in natural populations with isofemale strains. _Génét Sél Évol_. 20: 87–98. Article CAS Google Scholar * Hoffmann, A. A. and Parsons, P. A. (1991).
_Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress_ Oxford Science Publications, Oxford. * Hoffmann, A. A. and Parsons, P. A. (1997). _Extreme Environmental Change and Evolution_. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge. * Huey, R. B. and Bennett, A. F. (1990). Physiological adjustments to fluctuating thermal environments: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. In: Morimoto,
R. I., Tissiéres, A. and Georgopoulos, C. (eds) _Stress Proteins in Biology and Medicine_ pp. 37–59. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. * Johnston, I. A., Bennett,
A. F. (eds) (1996). _Phenotypic and Evolutionary Adaptations to Temperature. SEB Seminar Series_, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. * Kirkpatrick, M. (1996). Genes and adaptation: a
pocket guide to the theory. In: Rose, M. R. and Lauder, G. V. (eds). _Adaptation_, pp. 125–146. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. * Krebs, R. A. and Feder, M. E. (1997a). Natural variation in
the expression of the heat-shock protein Hsp70 in a population of _Drosophila melanogaster_, and its correlation with tolerance of ecologically relevant thermal stress. _Evolution_. 51:
173–179. Article PubMed Google Scholar * Krebs, R. A. and Feder, M. E. (1997b). Deleterious consequences of Hsp70 overexpression in _Drosophila melanogaster_ larvae. _Cell Stress &
Chaperones_. 2: 60–71. Article CAS Google Scholar * Krebs, R. A. and Loeschcke, V. (1994). Costs and benefits of activation of the heat-shock response in _Drosophila melanogaster_. _Funct
Ecol_, 8: 730–737. Article Google Scholar * Krebs, R. A. and Loeschcke, V. (1995). Resistance to thermal stress in preadult _Drosophila buzzatii_: variation among populations and changes
in relative resistance across life stages. _Biol J Linn Soc_, 56: 517–531. Article Google Scholar * Krebs, R. A. and Loeschcke, V. (1997). Estimating heritability in a threshold trait:
variation in heat stress resistance among isofemale lines of _Drosophila buzzatii_. _Heredity_. 79: 252–259. Article PubMed Google Scholar * Latter, B. D. H. and Mulley, J. C. (1995).
Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of _Drosophila melanogaster_. _Genetics_. 139: 255–266. CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
* Loeschcke, V. and Krebs, R. A. (1996). Selection for heat-shock resistance in larval and adult _Drosophila buzzatii_: comparing direct and indirect responses on viability and
development. _Evolution,_. 50: 2354–2359. Google Scholar * Loeschcke, V., Krebs, R. A., Dahgaard, J. and Michalak, P. (1997). High-temperature stress and the evolution of thermal resistance
in _Drosophila_. In: Bijlsma, R. and Loeschcke, V. (eds). _Environmental Stress Adaptation and Evolution_ pp. 175–190. Birkhäuser-Verlag, Basel. * Neyfakh, A. A. and Hartl, D. L. (1993).
Genetic control of the rate of embryonic development: selection for faster development at elevated temperatures. _Evolution_. 47: 1625–1631. Article PubMed Google Scholar * Parsell, D. A.
and Lindquist, S. (1993). The function of heat-shock proteins in stress tolerance: degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. _Ann Rev Genet_, 27: 437–496. Article CAS PubMed
Google Scholar * Partridge, L. and Fowler, K. (1992). Direct and correlated responses to selection at age of reproduction in _Drosophila melanogaster_.. _Evolution_. 46: 76–91. Article
PubMed Google Scholar * Rose, M. R. and Charlesworth, B. (1981). Genetics of life-history in _Drosophila melanogaster_ I. Sib analysis of adult females. _Genetics_. 97: 187–196. CAS
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Rutherford, S. L. and Lindquist, S. (1998). Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. _Nature_. 396: 336–342. Article CAS PubMed Google
Scholar * Service, P. M. and Rose, M. R. (1985). Genetic covariation among life-history components: the effect of novel environments. _Evolution_. 39: 943–945. Article PubMed Google
Scholar * Sgro, C. M. and Hoffmann, A. A. (1998). Heritable variation for fecundity in field-collected _Drosophila melanogaster_ and their offspring reared under different environmental
temperatures. _Evolution_. 52: 134–143. Article PubMed Google Scholar * Solomon, J. M., Rossi, J. M., Golic, K., Mcgarry, T. and Lindquist, S. (1991). Changes in Hsp70 alter
thermotolerance and heat-shock regulation in _Drosophila_. _The New Biologist_. 3: 1106–1120. CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Tatar, M., Khazaeli, A. A. and Curtsinger, J. W. (1997).
Chaperoning extended life. _Nature_. 390: 30–30. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Camilla Håkansson, Birgit Sørensen and Doth Andersen for
their valuable assistance with data collection. This research was made possible by grants to V.L. from the Carlsberg Foundation (no. 93–0280–30) and the Danish Natural Science Research
Council, which also supported R.K.’s stay in Denmark. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State
University, 2399 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, 44115, Ohio, USA Robert A Krebs * Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Aarhus, Ny Munkegade, Bldg. 540, Aarhus C, DK - 8000, Denmark
Volker Loeschcke Authors * Robert A Krebs View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Volker Loeschcke View author publications You can also search
for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Robert A Krebs. APPENDIX 1 APPENDIX 1 (See Table below) RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT
THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Krebs, R., Loeschcke, V. A genetic analysis of the relationship between life-history variation and heat-shock tolerance in _Drosophila buzzatii_. _Heredity_
83, 46–53 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6885410 Download citation * Received: 27 August 1998 * Accepted: 24 February 1999 * Published: 01 July 1999 * Issue Date: 01 July 1999 * DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6885410 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not
currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative KEYWORDS * acclimation * developmental time * environmental stress
* life table * longevity * trade-offs