ABSTRACT Carbon nanomaterials field-effect transistor (FET)-based electrical biosensors provide significant advantages over the current gold standards, holding great potential for realizing

direct, label-free, real-time electrical detection of biomolecules in a multiplexed manner with ultrahigh sensitivity and excellent selectivity. The feasibility of integrating them with

current complementary metal oxide semiconductor platform and a fluid handling module using standard microfabrication technology opens up new opportunities for the development of low-cost,

low-noise, portable electrical biosensors for use in practical future devices. In this article, we review recent progress in the rapidly developing area of biomolecular interaction detection

single-molecule level or at the single-cell level. This is due to the size comparability and the surface compatibility of the carbon nanomaterials with biological molecules. We also

summarize some current challenges the scientific community is facing, including device-to-device heterogeneity and the lack of system integration for uniform device array mass production.

SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS CARBON-BASED SERS BIOSENSOR: FROM SUBSTRATE DESIGN TO SENSING AND BIOAPPLICATION Article Open access 22 January 2021 CARBON-NANOTUBE FIELD-EFFECT

TRANSISTORS FOR RESOLVING SINGLE-MOLECULE APTAMER–LIGAND BINDING KINETICS Article 17 January 2024 BIOMOLECULE SENSORS BASED ON ORGANIC ELECTROCHEMICAL TRANSISTORS Article Open access 13

February 2025 MAIN A biosensor is an analytical device that incorporates a biological recognition element in direct spatial contact with a transduction element. This integration ensures the

rapid and convenient conversion of the biological events to detectable signals.1 With the discovery of rich nanomaterials and the development of exquisite nanofabrication tools, such as

electron beam lithography, focused ion beam and nanoimprint lithography, new avenues have been opened up in the field of biosensors in the last two decades.2, 3 In particular, researchers

around the world have been tailor-making a multitude of nanomaterials-based electrical biosensors and developing new strategies to apply them in ultrasensitive biosensing. Examples of such

nanomaterials include carbon nanotubes,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 nanowires,11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 nanoparticles,6, 22, 23, 24, 25 nanopores,26, 27 nanoclusters28 and

graphene.5, 29, 30, 31, 32 Compared with conventional optical, biochemical and biophysical methods, nanomaterial-based electronic biosensing offers significant advantages, such as high

sensitivity and new sensing mechanisms, high spatial resolution for localized detection, facile integration with standard wafer-scale semiconductor processing and label-free, real-time

detection in a nondestructive manner. Among diverse electrical biosensing architectures, devices based on field-effect transistors (FETs) have attracted great attention because they are an

ideal biosensor that can directly translate the interactions between target biological molecules and the FET surface into readable electrical signals.33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 In a standard

FET, current flows along a semiconductor path (the channel) that is connected to two electrodes, (the source and the drain). The channel conductance between the source and the drain is

switched on and off by a third (gate) electrode that is capacitively coupled through a thin dielectric layer. In conventional complementary metal oxide semiconductor-fabricated transistors,

the conducting channel is buried inside the substrate; in FET-based biosensors, the channel is in direct contact with the environment, and this gives better control over the surface charge.

This implies that surface FET-based biosensors might be more sensitive: biological events occurring at the channel surface could result in the surface potential variation of the

semiconductor channel and then modulate the channel conductance. In conjunction with the ease of on-chip integration of device arrays and the cost-effective device fabrication, the surface

ultrasensitivity places FET-based biosensors as attractive alternatives to existing biosensor technologies. In this review, we summarize recent progress in ultrasensitive biosensors formed

from nanomaterials-based FETs. We pay particular attention to carbon nanomaterials: single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) and graphene. This research field is a diverse and rapidly growing

one; having limited space and references, we will only be able to cover several of the major contributions. We will highlight some important aspects including strategies to increase

sensitivity, dynamic detection in cells and liquid environment, DNA hybridization and single-molecule detection, as these have been neglected in most previous reviews. Fortunately, there are

a number of excellent previous review papers in the literature covering various aspects of carbon nanomaterials-based biosensors, which can amend these deficiencies.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,

11, 12, 13, 30, 34 BASIC INTRODUCTION TO CARBON NANOMATERIALS There has been an explosion of interest in use of carbon nanomaterials in new nanoscale biosensors. Owing to their unique

physicochemical properties, SWNTs and, very recently, graphene are in the forefront of this explosion. Graphene is a two-dimensional (2D) crystalline monolayer made of _sp_2-hybridized

carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice.39, 40, 41 In fact, graphene is the basic building block for graphitic materials of all other dimensionalities. For example, by folding up a

graphene sheet into a cylinder along a certain lattice vector, a well-ordered, hollow graphitic nanomaterial, classified as a SWNT, is formed.42 Both of these two allotropes of carbon have

the simplest chemical composition and atomic bonding configuration in a 2D manner that maximizes its surface-to-volume ratio. Each carbon atom on the nanocarbon surface is exposed to the

environment and any small changes in the environment can result in drastic changes in the electrical properties of the nanocarbon device, thus forming the basis for ultrasensitive

biosensing.43, 44, 45 As a single biomolecule or a small collection of biomolecules approach the SWNT or graphene-based device, it or they can alter the electronic properties of the device

_via_ one or more of the following mechanisms: (1) surface charge-induced gating, (2) charge transfer or doping between carbon nanomaterials and biomolecules, (3) a scattering potential

across carbon nanomaterials, and (4) Schottky barrier modification between carbon nanomaterials and metal electrodes.46, 47, 48, 49 In the case of solution-gate FETs, the modulation of the

channel conductance is achieved by applying a gate potential at the solid/liquid interface from a reference electrode placed on top of the channel across the electrolyte that acts as the

dielectric. The conductance of SWNTs and graphene shows the strong dependence on the ionic strength, the pH and the type of ions present. The sensitivity to electrolyte composition is

attributed to a combination of different mechanisms including electrostatic gating, Schottky barrier medications and changes in gate capacitance.50 The second significant feature of SWNTs

and graphenes is that they are 2D conducting nanomaterials that are intrinsically the same size as the molecules. This size compatibility offers the opportunity of detecting single-molecule

events.51, 52 Third, SWNTs and graphenes are molecular chemicals entirely composed of carbon atoms, and this suggests a natural match to biomolecules. This also allows controlled

functionalization to selectively immobilize bioaffinitive agents on their surfaces. This can establish efficient electrical communication with biological analytes using one of two

alternative methods: noncovalent adsorption or wrapping of various bioaffinitive agents on the carbon surfaces through hydrophobic interactions,53 or covalent attachment to the functional

groups produced through chemical reactions on the carbon π-conjugated skeleton.10, 54 Ultimately, the nanocarbon reagents are large and can be easily micro/nanofabricated on a large range of

substrates. These major advantages of SWNTs and graphenes combined with their high conductivity, high chemical stability and easy availability through bottom-up approaches suggest that

carbon nanomaterials-based FETs have promise as paradigms for device architecture, yielding devices that are capable of converting biological information to easily detectable electrical

signals. SWNT FET-BASED BIOSENSORS SWNT−DYNAMIC DETECTION IN LIVING CELLS Nanostructured carbon materials have shown promising potential as novel nanoelectronic biosensors for biomolecular

detection; they are extraordinarily sensitive and their detection schemes are quite simple. Most of the realizations so far, however, have been limited to static _in vitro_ measurement. The

dynamic detection of the release of biomolecules from living cells in real time is important both in fundamental studies and in the evaluation of drugs for the treatment of secretion-related

diseases. To this goal, Huang _et al._55 utilized a SWNT network to directly interface with living neuroglial astrocytes and, without labels, detect the triggered release of ATP from these

cells. This detection scheme showed high temporal resolution. Highly charged ATP molecules secreted from the astrocyte diffused into the conductive channel of the FET and electrostatically

modulated the SWNT conductance, leading to measurable current responses. Heller _et al._56 used SWNTs in a contact-passivated, suspended layout to allow close contact between the cell and

the SWNT. They followed the process of phagocytosis in real time by simultaneously monitoring both changes in transistor conductance (FET signal) and changes in the electrochemical current

(signal), which suggests successful detection of cellular activity. They also demonstrated that the sensitivity for certain electrochemical processes could be enhanced when the SWNT was

coated with catalytic platinum nanoparticles. The goal of another study by the Chen and colleagues57 was to improve the biocompatible interactions between SWNTs and living cells; they

demonstrated that noncovalent functionalization of SWNTs with bioactive sugar moieties conferred biocompatibility without compromising the sensing capabilities of their devices. The SWNT

network was first surface-functionalized via π–π interactions with bioactive sugars (_N_-acetyl-D-glucosamine) to allow PC12 cells to adhere and grow on the SWNT-net substrate. When the

solution with high K+ content was administrated to the cells to evoke Ca2+ influx through voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and consequently trigger exocytosis of secretory vesicles, single-cell

secretion of catecholamine molecules occurred, and this resulted in current responses (spikes) of glycosylated SWNT-net FETs (Figures 1a and b). This is because the aromatic rings of the

catecholamines at the cell–nanotube junction attach noncovalently to the nanotube sidewall and thereby impose a p-doping effect that increases nanotube conductance. A similar approach of

surface functionalization was also reported previously by Wang _et al.,_58 who used single-SWNT-based FETs to detect the acute release of chromogranin A at low concentration (1 nM) from

living cortical neurons and monitor dose-dependent chromogranin A release from a single bovine chromaffin cell positioned above the sensing region by a micropipette and stimulated by

histamine.59 These studies provide a real-time and noninvasive measurement platform to examine subtle cellular activities from living cells with high temporal resolution and ease of

detection. SWNT−FUNCTIONALIZATION TO INCREASE SENSITIVITY The properties of SWNTs can be leveraged by combining them with other functional materials, such as small molecules, lipid membrane

or aptamers, to enhance the biosensing performance and install new functionalities. For example, Zhou _et al._60 showed the integration of supported lipid bilayers with SWNT FETs (Figures 1c

and d). They first demonstrated membrane continuity and lipid diffusion over the tube. Then they showed that the nanotube acted as a diffusion barrier for a membrane-bound tetanus toxin

protein, and that the strength of the barrier depended on the diameter of the nanotube. Finally, they present results on the electrical detection of specific binding of streptavidin to

biotinylated lipids. The formation of fluidic supported lipid bilayers on SWNTs allowed the study of lipid–SWNT interactions and sensing of analytes binding to specific receptors embedded in

the supported lipid bilayers. Kim _et al._61 coated SWNT surfaces with human olfactory receptor 2AG1 and reported the real-time detection of specific odorant molecules (such as amyl

butyrate, butyl butyrate, propyl butyrate and pentyl valerate). The observed femtomolar sensitivity resulted from the deformation of the human olfactory receptor 2AG1 protein when the

WNT-bound protein and the odorants docked. Vedala _et al._62 used SWNT FETs that were noncovalently functionalized with porphyrin-based glycoconjugates synthesized using ‘click’ azide-alkyne

chemistry. They realized a highly selective electrical detection of interactions between glycoconjugates and bacterial lectins (PA-IL and PA-IIL from _Pseudomonas aeruginosa_ and a plant

lectin concanavalin A, respectively), which exhibit specific multivalent binding to carbohydrates. So _et al._63 functionalized SWNT FETs with RNA-based _Escherichia coli_ aptamers, which

can be selectively recognized by _E. coli_. By using these aptamer-functionalized SWNT FETs combined with the most probable number method, they demonstrated a reliable screening tool for

microorganisms such as _E. coli_. However, there is a difference of two orders of magnitude in titer estimation between the culture method and the most probable number-combined SWNT FETs.

This is probably due to the small number of examples studied and the small sensing surfaces of devices. Villamizar _et al._64 reported a method of using anti-_Salmonella_ antibodies to

functionalize SWNT network-based FETs, which were subsequently protected by Tween 20 to prevent nonspecific binding (NSB) of other proteins, for the selective determination of _S. infantis_

at low concentration (at least 100 c.f.u. ml−1). These studies show that functionalized SWNT FET-based promise to be useful platforms for detecting microorganisms, such as antibodies, fungi,

bacteria or viruses, with high selectivity. SWNT–DNA HYBRIDIZATION The detection of DNA hybridization has been a topic of central importance owing to its use in the diagnosis of pathogenic

and genetic diseases. Previous reports indicated that single-stranded DNA can form a stable complex with individual SWNTs by wrapping around them, the interaction being driven by the

aromatic interactions between nucleotide bases and SWNT sidewalls. Label-free electrical detection of DNA hybridization utilizing SWNT FET-based biosensors suggests a new generation of DNA

chips that can give direct electrical readouts. This could provide fast and inexpensive analyses of nucleic acid samples. In 2006, Star _et al._65 used SWNT FETs to study interactions

between single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides and SWNTs and the subsequent DNA hybridization processes that occurred on the device surface. They showed that SWNT FETs could be selectively

modified with DNA oligonucleotides and maintain hybridization specificity. Then they demonstrated that SWNT FETs with immobilized synthetic oligonucleotides could recognize target DNA

sequences with single-nucleotide polymorphism and that electronic signal output from the SWNT FET biochips clearly differentiated between mutant and wild-type alleles of the _HFE_ gene (the

gene that is responsible for hereditary hemochromatosis). To ensure specific adsorption of DNA to SWNTs, Martinez _et al._66 developed a new approach for making functionalized SWNT FET

arrays to detect DNA hybridization (Figure 2a). In that study aminated single-strand DNA was covalently attached to the polymer poly

(methylmethacrylate0.6-co-poly(ethyleneglycol)methacrylate0.15-co-_N_-succinimidylmethacrylate0.25) that was noncovalently absorbed to the nanotube surface. This method of anchoring the

probe DNA can prevent the nonspecific adsorption of DNA molecules onto SWNTs that can occur by virtue of aggregation on the sidewalls of the contact electrodes. They demonstrated that DNA

hybridization led to statistical changes in the threshold voltages resulting from the charge trapping character of hybridized DNA. Although label-free electrical detection of DNA and

biomolecules using SWNT FETs has been successfully achieved, the detection limits are typically on the order of ca. 1 nM of DNA. To improve the sensitivity, Dong _et al._67 reported a novel

‘nanoparticle enhancement’ approach (Figure 2b), in which the target DNAs are hybridized with probe DNAs on the device, and reporter DNAs labeled with Au nanoparticles flank a segment of the

target DNA sequence. Before detection, they blocked the SiO2 surface by octyltrichlorosilane treatment to reduce possible NSB of DNA to SiO2 and vacant SWNT surfaces by using polyethylene

glycol to reduce the NSB of DNA to SWNTs. With careful experiments, they demonstrated that the detection sensitivity of SWNT FET-based biosensors for DNA can be improved to ca. 100 fM.

SWNT−SINGLE-MOLECULE DETECTION A key goal of modern bioscience is monitoring biomolecular interactions with high sensitivity and high selectivity in real time, with the ultimate aim of

detecting single-molecule events in natural samples. SWNT FET-based biosensors hold the promise of detecting single-molecule processes because of the size compatibility of SWNTs with

biological entities. In the following discussion, we will highlight the recent advances of the burgeoning field of single-molecule biosensing. Most of this research thus far has dealt with

proofs of concept and has used biological solutions or samples made in the laboratory rather than natural samples. Recently, Goldsmith _et al._51 have developed an electrochemical method to

create single point defects in SWNTs in a controllable manner and then covalently bind biomolecules at this scattering site. Owing to the real-time monitoring of conductance during the

defect generation, these point-functionalized SWNT FETs can be prepared in high yield. Using these devices, they also demonstrated continuous, multihour monitoring of the binding of a single

molecule with high sensitivity (a conductance change of >100 nS for binding of a reactive carbodiimide). This sensitivity is due to the Coulomb interaction between the molecule and the

defect that modulates scattering in the 1D channel.52 This approach provides a new electronic platform for studying biomolecular interactions and kinetics that are hidden in ensemble

measurements, as demonstrated by Sorgenfrei _et al._68 In this study, they covalently attached a single-stranded probe DNA sequence, which was terminated with an amine group, to a carboxylic

acid-functionalized point defect in a carbon nanotube using a standard amide-formation coupling reaction. After probe DNA was attached, these devices were used to study the kinetics and

thermodynamics of DNA hybridization with the experimental setup shown in Figure 3a. In the absence of target DNA, the devices did not show any particular features in a conductance dominated

by flicker (1/_f_) noise, as shown in Figures 3b. When the device was immersed in buffer containing complementary target DNA, however, reproducible large-amplitude two-level fluctuations

appeared at different temperatures, as shown in Figures 3d. Conductance differences reached ∼60–100 nS and the signal-to-noise ratio >3 (over the 1/_f_ noise background) over a time

interval of 30 s. This observation can be explained by the proposed model that the device conductance is controlled by probe-target hybridization that decreases the device conductance

because of increased scattering and charge transfer at the position of target DNA binding. This effect would be partially offset by the Debye screening from the dissolved solution counter

ions for longer DNA strands. Further kinetic investigations of the system as a function of temperature demonstrated non-Arrhenius behavior; this agrees with DNA hybridization experiments

using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. This technique is label-free and could be used to probe single-molecule dynamics at microsecond timescales. An alternative to the aforementioned

single-point functionalization for single-molecule biosensing is the fabrication of molecular electronic devices from single molecules that can be subsequently derivatized with a probe

molecule that is capable of biomolecular recognition. To do this, a new system was recently developed for measuring the conductance of a single molecule covalently immobilized within a

nanotube gap (Figure 4a).69 In this system, gaps are formed in carboxylic-acid-functionalized SWNTs that can be reconnected by one or a few molecules attached to both sides of the gap

through amide bond formation. Consequently, the devices are sufficiently robust so that a wide range of chemistries and conditions can be applied. By using this method, we have made

molecular devices that detect the binding between proteins and substrates at the single-event level, and that probe the dependence of charge transport of a single intact DNA duplex on its

Π-stacking integrity.70 However, biomolecular interactions cannot be measured in real time. To do this, a useful strategy has been recently developed to create an integrated system that can

combine rapid real-time measurements with single-molecule sensitivity.71 In this study, individual DNA aptamers were coupled with SWNTs as point contacts to form single-molecule devices that

allow us to selectively and reversibly detect a target protein, thrombin (Figure 4b). After further thrombin treatment, these fresh aptamer-functionalized devices showed consistent

conductance increases originating from the enhanced DNA charge transfer that is due to the rigidification of DNA conformation by DNA–thrombin interactions. To achieve real-time measurements,

a repeating pattern that consists of 79 identical SWNT transistors by a double photolithographic process was designed and fabricated (Figure 4c). Combining this design with microfluidics

(Figure 4c, inset) allowed us both to detect proteins and to monitor stochastic DNA–protein interactions in real time (Figure 4d). Reversible and equivalent conductance changes at different

thrombin concentrations (from 2.6 fM to 2.6 pM and 2.6 nM; Figure 4d) were observed, thus demonstrating single-molecule sensitivity. Further delivery of elastase (3.4 nM) did not lead to any

detectable conductance change in the same device. In a separate experiment, we observed negligible conductance changes upon thrombin injection using the devices reconnected with a different

DNA (Con-A), which could not bind human thrombin, (2.6 fM; Figure 4e). Both control experiments demonstrated that this protein detection scheme has excellent selectivity. These results

distinguished this method as a valuable platform to achieve real-time, label-free, reversible detection of DNA–protein interactions with high selectivity and real single-molecule

sensitivity. GRAPHENE FET-BASED BIOSENSORS Graphene, a new allotrope of carbon made of _sp_2-hybridized carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice, is an ideal 2D system with remarkable

electronic, physical and chemical properties. When incorporated into electrical devices, graphene shows high mobilities of both holes and electrons. It is structurally uniform, that is, it

shows no structural variations analogous to those of diameter and chirality that characterize SWNTs. Even though it is chemically quite stable, its reaction chemistry has been developed to

the extent that flexible chemical modifications are possible. High-quality graphenes are available from mechanical exfoliation from graphite, reduction of graphene oxides (GOs), chemical

vapor deposition growth and chemical synthesis. It has also been proven to be easily incorporated into devices. In conjunction with its subnanoscale thickness and surface compatibility with

various biological species, these properties make graphene a promising building block for developing new types of nanoscale biosensors. Recently, the increasing interest in graphene for

biosensing applications seems to have overtaken the corresponding interest in SWNTs. GRAPHENE−STRATEGIES TO INCREASE SENSITIVITY The first graphene FET-based electrical biosensors were

demonstrated by Mohanty _et al._,72 who made graphene transistors from chemically modified graphenes (CMGs), such as GOs or graphene amines (GAs) obtained by treating GOs with nitrogenous

plasmas or ethylenediamne. They immobilized GO and GA sheets on silica substrates with either predeposited or postdeposited gold electrodes, and used silicon as a backgate for electrical

measurements. They exploited the functional groups on GOs or GAs to fabricate three CMG-based biosensors: (i) a single-bacterium biodevice, (ii) a label-free DNA sensor and (iii) a bacterial

DNA/protein, and a polyelectrolyte chemical transistor. The bacteria biodevice was highly sensitive; just a single bacterium attachment caused a sharp (42%) increase in conductivity of CMG

sheets (Figure 5a). This can be attributed to the p-type characteristic of CMGs, where the attachment of a negatively charged species, such as bacteria, is equivalent to a negative potential

gating, and this gating increases the hole density and thus the conductivity of CMG. Similarly, single-stranded DNA tethered on graphene reversibly increased the device conductance during

cycles of dehybridization and rehybridization with its complementary DNA strand (Figure 5b). Finally, they demonstrated that adsorption of polyelectrolyte molecules on the modified graphenes

resulted in polarity-dependent changes in electrical conductivity. To improve the detection sensitivity, Dong _et al._73 used large, CVD-grown graphene films to fabricate biosensors,

thereby achieving DNA sensing with a concentration as low as 0.01 nM. They attribute this marked increase in sensitivity to the electronic n-doping to the devices. They further found that

adding AuNPs on the surface of graphene devices could extend the upper limit of DNA detection from 10 to 500 nM due to the increase in loading of probe DNA molecules onto the AuNPs. This

AuNP strategy is apparently widely applicable: Mao _et al._74 demonstrated a specific protein detection biosensor using reduced GO sheets decorated with Au nanoparticle–antibody conjugates

(Figure 6a). The response of the sensor increases with the increase of protein concentrations and saturates at 0.02 mg ml−1. The lower detection limit of the sensor is on the order of ng 

ml−1 and could be further improved by optimizing the device structure. To achieve real-time biomolecular sensing, Huang _et al._75 demonstrated the use of large-sized CVD-grown graphene

films configured as field-effect transistors for detecting glucose or glutamate molecules by the conductance changes of the graphene transistors as the molecules were being oxidized by the

specific redox enzyme (glucose oxidase or glutamic dehydrogenase) attached to the graphene film. GRAPHENE−DETECTION IN LIQUID ENVIRONMENT So far, most graphene FETs have operated either

under vacuum or atmospheric conditions, not in solution. In some cases, high-quality graphene can be grown epitaxially on SiC substrates. Because of the thickness of the intrinsic substrate

on SiC, to achieve field effect responses, top gating of the epitaxial graphene is required in most cases except that based on nitrogen implantation into a SiC wafer before graphene

growth.76 Previous reports have proved that an efficient approach for top gating is ‘solution top-gating’. Only very recently has the operation of graphene in aqueous electrolytes (Figure

6b) for use in biosensors and bioelectronics been reported by several groups.77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 For example, Ang _et al._77 first demonstrated the use of solution-gated

epitaxial graphene as a pH sensor. Ohno _et al._78 reported on electrolyte-gated graphene field-effect transistors for detecting pH and protein adsorption. In another report by Ohno _et

al._,79 they demonstrated label-free immunosensing based on an aptamer-modified graphene FETs (Figure 6c). Immunoglobulin E aptamers with an approximate height of 3 nm were successfully

immobilized on a graphene surface, as confirmed by atomic force microscopy. The aptamer-modified graphene FETs showed selective electrical detection of immunoglobulin E protein. From the

dependence of the drain current variation on the immunoglobulin E concentration, the dissociation constant was estimated to be 47 nM, indicating good affinity (Figure 6d). In a similar way,

Agarwal _et al._87 recently demonstrated the biocompatibility of reduced GOs with proteins and further used them after protein functionalization to create biosensors for detecting various

metals in real time with high sensitivity.81 These reports already confirm the potential of graphene for sensing in aqueous electrolytes, however, detailed understandings of the

graphene/electrolyte interface and the effect of the electrolyte on the electronic transport in graphene are still lacking. To address these issues, Dankerl _et al._82 developed a facile

method for the scalable fabrication of graphene FET arrays and provided a comprehensive characterization of operation of these devices in aqueous electrolytes. By using in-solution

Hall-effect measurements and taking into account the microscopic structure of water at the interface, they demonstrated that charge carrier mobilities and concentrations as a function of

electrolyte gate potential can be directly determined. They also showed that graphene FETs exhibited a high transconductance and correspondingly high sensitivity together with an effective

gate noise as low as tens of μV. These studies demonstrated that graphene FETs, with their ease of fabrication, high transconductance, and low noise, hold great promise for biosensor and

bioelectronic applications. GRAPHENE−DETECTION IN CELLS To further investigate the biocompatibility of graphene with live cells or tissue, Cohen-Karni _et al._83 demonstrated for the first

time recording from eletrogenic cells using single-layer graphene formed by mechanical exfoliation from graphite and carried out simultaneous recording using graphene and silicon nanowire

FETs (Figure 7a). They found that graphene FET conductance signals recorded from spontaneously beating embryonic chicken cardiomyocytes yielded well-defined extracellular signals with

signal-to-noise ratio routinely >4 (Figure 7b). Water gate (_V_wg)-dependent experiments demonstrated that the conductance signal amplitude could be tuned over nearly an order of

magnitude, thus showing a robust graphene/cell interface. Furthermore, by varying _V_wg across the Dirac point, they achieved the expected signal polarity flip, thus allowing both n- and

p-type recording to be achieved with the same device simply by offsetting _V_wg. Finally, they compared peak-to-peak recorded signal widths (made as a function of graphene FET device size)

with those made using silicon nanowire-FETs and showed that the widths increased with the area of graphene FET devices. This indicates that they were measuring a signal that was averaged

from different points across the outer membrane of the beating cells. In another recent work, Agarwal _et al._87 demonstrated the biocompatibility of reduced GOs with live cells, such as

neuroendocrine PC12 cells, and further used them to create biosensors for detecting the dynamic secretion of the hormonal catecholamine molecules from living cells.80 Pursuing the

development of a graphene-based technology that can detect action potentials from electrically active cells, Hess _et al._84 recently reported using arrays of CVD-grown graphene FETs for the

extracellular detection of action potentials from electrogenic cells (Figures 7c and d). The action potentials of cardiomyocyte-like HL-1 cells could be effectively resolved and tracked

across the transistor array as shown in Figure 7e. The low-noise characteristic of graphene FETs together with the large transconductive sensitivity of these devices clearly indicates an

advantage of graphene FETs in terms of signal-to-noise ratio. These studies suggest that the outstanding performance of graphene FETs together with the feasibility of easily integrating

graphene electronics with flexible substrates can pave the way for a true breakthrough in bioelectronics, in particular for electrically functional neural prostheses. SUMMARY AND PERSPECTIVE

In this article, we reviewed some recent advances in the rapidly developing area of biomolecule detection using carbon nanomaterial FET-based biosensors. We feel these biosensors have had

substantial impact and have genuine potential for future applications. By taking advantage of the outstanding electrical properties and the environmental ultrasensitivity of carbon

nanomaterials many strategies have been developed to create SWNT or graphene FET-based biosensors for directly detecting DNA–DNA hybridizations, DNA–protein interactions, protein functions

and cellular activities in real time with high sensitivity and excellent selectivity. In particular, because of the size comparability and the surface compatibility with biological

molecules, an amazing feature of using SWNT or graphene FETs in biosensing is their ability to detect biomolecules at the single-molecule level, as well as at the single-cell level. Although

SWNT and graphene share some common functionalities, such as high conductivity and high chemical stability, each has its own advantages and disadvantages. For example, SWNTs are 1D and can

be produced in bulk quantities while large-scale production of high-quality graphene is still difficult. In contrast, owing to its 2D nature graphene is ideal for forming larger interfaces

with biomolecules, and graphene-based could be produced using traditional lithographic techniques down to the nanoscale. However, when incorporated into the proper device architecture and

combined with direct electrical transduction, the associated signal processing circuitry, and a fluid handling module (fabricated using standard microfabrication technology), the distinct

and complementary capabilities of SWNT or graphene FETs could open up new opportunities for the development of bioelectronics toward practical applications in the future. Despite this

remarkable progress, none of the nanocarbon FET-based electrical biosensors has yet advanced to the production scale. The major challenge primarily stems from the device-to-device

heterogeneity of baseline electronic properties. This is because of the absence of diameter and chirality control for SWNTs and the difficulty of controlling layer number and surface

cleanness of graphene. Developing a reliable and scalable fabrication technique for mass-producing identical carbon nanomaterials arrays and integrating individuals into functional devices

with high yields are some of the technical issues to be addressed in future. The next problem is system integration. Most of the studies reported in the literature used a sample delivery

system, such as a syringe pump that was neither integrated to the sensing platform nor to the readout module. Furthermore, except for a few cases, most of the measurements were carried out

in ideal media such as pure buffer solutions. The real physiological sample is far more complex and will definitely introduce a range of interfering and fouling effects. Multiplexing is also

an attractive goal, and toward this end the fabrication of parallel and integrated biosensor arrays that have spatially resolved specific functionalities prepared using spatially resolved

surface functionalizations remains challenging. Nevertheless, compared with the current gold standards, that is, PCR, mass spectrometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, nanocarbon

FET-based electrical biosensors hold several significant advantages: simplicity, low-cost, portability, ultrahigh sensitivity, excellent selectivity and label-free, real-time, electrical

detection. This suggests a thriving research field that can anticipate countless applications in a wide variety of areas: clinic diagnostics, environment preservation, health improvement,

national defense and bioterrorism prevention. REFERENCES * Thevenot, D. R., Toth, K., Durst, R. A. & Wilson, G. S. Electrochemical biosensors: recommended definitions and classification.

_Biosens. Bioelectron._ 16, 121–131 (2001). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Liu, J. W., Cao, Z. H. & Lu, Y. Functional nucleic acid sensors. _Chem. Rev._ 109, 1948–1998 (2009). Article

  CAS  Google Scholar  * Rosi, N. L. & Mirkin, C. A. Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. _Chem. Rev._ 105, 1547–1562 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Huang, Y. X. & Chen, P.

Nanoelectronic biosensing of dynamic cellular activities based on nanostructured materials. _Adv. Mater._ 22, 2818–2823 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yang, W. R., Ratinac, K. R.,

Ringer, S. P., Thordarson, P., Gooding, J. J. & Braet, F. Carbon nanomaterials in biosensors: should you use nanotubes or graphene? _Angew. Chem. Int. Ed._ 49, 2114–2138 (2010). Article

  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, J. Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors. _Analyst_ 130, 421–426 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Allen, B. L., Kichambare, P. D. & Star, A.

Carbon nanotube field-effect-transistor-based biosensors. _Adv. Mater._ 19, 1439–1451 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lahiff, E., Lynam, C., Gilmartin, N., O'Kennedy, R. &

Diamond, D. The increasing importance of carbon nanotubes and nanostructured conducting polymers in biosensors. _Anal. Bioanal. Chem._ 398, 1575–1589 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Liu, Z., Tabakman, S., Welsher, K. & Dai, H. J. Carbon nanotubes in biology and medicine: _in vitro_ and _in vivo_ detection, imaging and drug delivery. _Nano Res._ 2, 85–120 (2009).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Liu, S., Shen, Q., Cao, Y., Gan, L., Wang, Z. X., Steigerwald, M. L. & Guo, X. F. Chemical functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotube field-effect

transistors as switches and sensors. _Coord. Chem. Rev._ 254, 1101–1116 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Roy, S. & Gao, Z. Q. Nanostructure-based electrical biosensors. _Nano

Today_ 4, 318–334 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Gruner, G. Carbon nanotube transistors for biosensing applications. _Anal. Bioanal. Chem._ 384, 322–335 (2006). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Kauffman, D. R. & Star, A. Electronically monitoring biological interactions with carbon nanotub field-effect transistors. _Chem. Soc. Rev._ 37, 1197–1206 (2008). Article 

CAS  Google Scholar  * Arlett, J. L., Myers, E. B. & Roukes, M. L. Comparative advantages of mechanical biosensors. _Nat. Nanotechnol._ 6, 203–215 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Song, S. P., Qin, Y., He, Y., Huang, Q., Fan, C. H. & Chen, H.-Y. Functional nanoprobes for ultrasensitive detection of biomolecules. _Chem. Soc. Rev._ 39, 4234–4243 (2010). Article 

CAS  Google Scholar  * He, Y., Fan, C. H. & Lee, S.-T. Silicon nanostructures for bioapplications. _Nano Today_ 5, 282–295 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chen, K.-I., Li, B.-R.

& Chen, Y.-T. Silicon nanowire field-effect transistor-based biosensors for biomedical diagnosis and cellular recording investigation. _Nano Today_ 6, 131–154 (2011). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Zheng, G. F., Patolsky, F., Cui, Y., Wang, W. U. & Lieber, C. M. Multiplexed electrical detection of cancer markers with nanowire sensor arrays. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 23,

1294–1301 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Stern, E., Klemic, J. F., Routenberg, D. A., Wyrembak, P. N., Turner-Evans, D. B., Hamilton, A. D., LaVan, D. A., Fahmy, T. M. & Reed,

M. A. Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires. _Nature_ 445, 519–522 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Stern, E., Vacic, A., Rajan, N. K., Criscione,

J. M., Park, J., Ilic, B. R., Mooney, D. J., Reed, M. A. & Fahmy, T. M. Label-free biomarker detection from whole blood. _Nat. Nanotechnol._ 5, 138–142 (2010). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Tian, B. Z., Cohen-Karni, T., Qing, Q., Duan, X. J., Xie, P. & Lieber, C. M. Three-dimensional, flexible nanoscale field-effect transistors as localized bioprobes. _Science_

329, 830–834 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Medintz, I. L., Uyeda, H. T., Goldman, E. R. & Mattoussi, H. Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing. _Nat.

Mater._ 4, 435–446 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wilson, R. The use of gold nanoparticles in diagnostics and detection. _Chem. Soc. Rev._ 37, 2028–2045 (2008). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Nam, J.-M., Thaxton, C. S. & Mirkin, C. A. Nanoparticle-based bio-bar codes for the ultrasensitive detection of proteins. _Science_ 301, 1884–1886 (2003). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Alivisatos, P. The use of nanocrystals in biological detection. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 22, 47–52 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dekker, C. Solid-state nanopores. _Nat.

Nanotechnol._ 2, 209–215 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Howorka, S. & Siwy, Z. Nanopore analytics: sensing of single molecules. _Chem. Soc. Rev._ 38, 2360–2384 (2009). Article

  CAS  Google Scholar  * Soleymani, L., Fang, Z. C., Sargent, E. H. & Kelley, S. O. Programming the detection limits of biosensors through controlled nanostructuring. _Nat. Nanotechnol._

4, 844–848 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ratinac, K. R., Yang, W. R., Gooding, J. J., Thordarson, P. & Braet, F. Graphene and related materials in electrochemical sensing.

_Electroanalysis_ 23, 803–826 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ohno, Y., Maehashi, K. & Matsumoto, K. Chemical and biological sensing applications based on graphene field-effect

transistors. _Biosens. Bioelectron._ 26, 1727–1730 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Huang, X., Yin, Z. Y., Wu, S. X., Qi, X. Y., He, Q. Y., Zhang, Q. C., Yan, Q. Y., Boey, F. &

Zhang, H. Graphene-based materials: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. _Small_ 7, 1876–1902 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * He, Q. Y., Wu, S. X., Yin, Z. Y.

& Zhang, H. _Graphene-based electronic sensors. Chem. Sci._ 3, 1764–1772 (2012). CAS  Google Scholar  * Cui, Y., Wei, Q. Q., Park, H. K. & Lieber, C. M. Nanowire nanosensors for

highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. _Science_ 293, 1289–1292 (2001). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Patolsky, F., Zheng, G. F. & Lieber, C. M.

Fabrication of silicon nanowire devices for ultrasensitive, label-free, real-time detection of biological and chemical speciesw. _Nat. Protoc._ 1, 1711–1724 (2006). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Wang, W. U., Chen, C., Lin, K.-H., Fang, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Label-free detection of small-molecule-protein interactions by using nanowire nanosensors. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

USA_ 102, 3208–3212 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Patolsky, F., Timko, B. P., Yu, G. H., Fang, Y., Greytak, A. B., Zhang, G. F. & Lieber, C. M. Detection, stimulation, and

inhibition of neuronal signals with high-density nanowire transistor arrays. _Science_ 313, 1100–1104 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chen, R. J., Bangsaruntip, S., Drouvalakis, K.

A., Kam, N. W. S., Shim, M., Li, Y. M., Kim, W., Utz, P. J. & Dai, H. J. Noncovalent functionalization of carbon nanotubes for highly specific electronic biosensors. _Proc. Natl. Acad.

Sci. USA_ 100, 4984–4989 (2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Besteman, K., Lee, J.-O., Wiertz, F. G. M., Heering, H. A. & Dekker, C. Enzyme-coated carbon nanotubes as single-molecule

biosensors. _Nano Lett._ 3, 727–730 (2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V. &

Firsov, A. A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. _Science_ 306, 666–669 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhang, Y. B., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P.

Experimental observation of the quantum hall effect and berry’s phase in graphene. _Nature_ 438, 201–204 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Huang, X., Qi, X. Y., Boey, F. & Zhang,

H. Graphene-based composites. _Chem. Soc. Rev._ 41, 666–686 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dai, H. J. Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, integration, and properties. _Acc. Chem. Res._ 35,

1035–1044 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Schedin, F., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Hill, E. W., Blake, P., Katsnelson, M. I. & Novoselov, K. S. Detection of individual gas

molecules adsorbed on graphene. _Nat. Mater._ 6, 652–655 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, Q., Guo, X. F., Cai, L. C., Cao, Y., Gan, L., Liu, S., Wang, Z. X., Zhang, H. T. &

Li, L. D. TiO2-decorated graphenes as efficient photoswitches with high oxygen sensitivity. _Chem. Sci._ 2, 1860–1864 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Guo, X. F., Huang, L. M.,

O’Brien, S., Kim, P. & Nuckolls, C. Directing and sensing changes in molecular conformation on individual carbon nanotube field effect transistors. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 127, 15045–15047

(2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chen, R. J., Choi, H. C., Bangsaruntip, S., Yenilmez, E., Tang, X. W., Wang, Q., Chang, Y.-L. & Dai, H. J. An investigation of the mechanisms of

electronic sensing of protein adsorption on carbon nanotube devices. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 126, 1563–1568 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tang, X. W., Bansaruntip, S., Nakayama, N.,

Yenilmez, E., Chang, Y.-L. & Wang, Q. Carbon nanotube DNA sensor and sensing mechanism. _Nano Lett._ 6, 1632–1636 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Gui, E. L., Li, L.-J., Zhang, K.

K., Xu, Y. P., Dong, X. C., Ho, X. N., Lee, P. S., Kasim, J., Shen, Z. X., Rogers, J. A. & Mhaisalkar, S. G. DNA sensing by field-effect transistors based on networks of carbon

nanotubes. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 129, 14427–14432 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Byon, H. R. & Choi, H. C. Network single-walled carbon nanotube-field effect transistors

(SWNT-FETs) with increased schottky contact area for highly sensitive biosensor applications. _J. Am. Chem. Soc_ 128, 2188–2189 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Heller, I., Chatoor,

S., Mannik, J., Zevenbergen, M. A. G., Dekker, C. & Lemay, S. G. Influence of electrolyte composition on liquid-gated carbon nanotube and graphene transistors. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 132,

17149–17156 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Goldsmith, B. R., Coroneus, J. G., Khalap, K. R., Kane, A. A., Weiss, G. A. & Collins, P. G. Conductance-controlled point

functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes. _Science_ 315, 77–81 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Goldsmith, B. R., Coroneus, J. G., Kane, A. A., Weiss, G. A. & Collins,

P. G. Monitoring single-molecule reactivity on a carbon nanotube. _Nano Lett._ 8, 189–194 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Banerjee, S., Hemraj-Benny, T. & Wong, S. S. Covalent

surface chemistry of single-walled carbon nanotubes. _Adv. Mater._ 17, 17–29 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhao, Y.-L. & Stoddart, J. F. Noncovalent functionalization of

single-walled carbon nanotubes. _Acc. Chem. Res._ 42, 1161–1171 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Huang, Y. X., Sudibya, H. G., Fu, D. L., Xue, R. H., Dong, X. C., Li, L.-J. &

Chen, P. Label-free detection of ATP release from living astrocytes with high temporal resolution using carbon nanotube network. _Biosens. Bioelectron._ 24, 2716–2720 (2009). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Heller, I., Smaal, W. T. T., Lemay, S. G. & Dekker, C. Probing macrophage activity with carbon-nanotube sensors. _Small_ 5, 2528–2532 (2009). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Sudibya, H. G., Ma, J. M., Dong, X. C., Ng, S., Li, L.-J., Liu, X.-W. & Chen, P. Interfacing glycosylated carbon-nanotube-network devices with living cells to detect dynamic

secretion of biomolecules. _Angew. Chem. Int. Ed._ 48, 2723–2726 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, C.-W., Pan, C.-Y., Wu, H.-C., Shih, P.-Y., Tsai, C.-C., Liao, K.-T., Lu, L.-L.,

Hsieh, W.-H., Chen, C.-D. & Chen, Y.-T. _In situ_ detection of chromogranin a released from living neurons with a single-walled carbon-nanotube field-effect transistor. _Small_ 3,

1350–1355 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tsai, C.-C., Yang, C.-C., Shih, P.-Y., Wu, C.-S., Chen, C.-D., Pan, C.-Y. & Chen, Y.-T. Exocytosis of a single bovine adrenal chromaffin

cell: the electrical and morphological studies. _J. Phys. Chem. B_ 112, 9165–9173 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhou, X. J., Moran-Mirabal, J. M., Craighead, H. G. & McEuen,

P. L. Supported lipid bilayer/carbon nanotube hybrids. _Nat. Nanotechnol._ 2, 185–190 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kim, T. H., Lee, S. H., Lee, J., Song, H. S., Oh, E. H., Park,

T. H. & Hong, S. Single-carbon-atomic-resolution detection of odorant molecules using a human olfactory receptor-based bioelectronic nose. _Adv. Mater._ 21, 91–94 (2009). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Vedala, H., Chen, Y. N., Cecioni, S., Imberty, A., Vidal, S. & Star, A. Nanoelectronic detection of lectin-carbohydrate interactions using carbon nanotubes. _Nano

Lett._ 11, 170–175 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * So, H.-M., Park, D.-W., Jeon, E.-K., Kim, Y.-H., Kim, B. S., Lee, C.-K., Choi, S. Y., Kim, S. C., Chang, H. & Lee, J.-O.

Detection and titer estimation of _Escherichia coli_ using aptamer-functionalized single-walled carbon-nanotube field-effect transistors. _Small_ 4, 197–201 (2008). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Villamizar, R. A., Maroto, A., Rius, F. X., Inza, I. & Figueras, M. J. Fast detection of salmonella infantis with carbon nanotube field effect transistors. _Biosens.

Bioelectron._ 24, 279–283 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Star, A., Tu, E., Niemann, J., Gabriel, J.-C. P., Joiner, C. S. & Valcke, C. Label-free detection of DNA hybridization

using carbon nanotube network field-effect transistors. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA_ 103, 921–926 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Martinez, M. T., Tseng, Y.-C., Ormategui, N.,

Loinaz, I., Eritja, R. & Bokor, J. Label-free DNA biosensors based on functionalized carbon nanotube field effect transistors. _Nano Lett._ 9, 530–536 (2009). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Dong, X. C., Lau, C. M., Lohani, A., Mhaisalkar, S. G., Kasim, J., Shen, Z. X., Ho, X. N., Rogers, J. A. & Li, L.-J. Electrical detection of femtomolar DNA via

gold-nanoparticle enhancement in carbon-nanotube-network field-effect transistors. _Adv. Mater._ 20, 2389–2393 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sorgenfrei, S., Chiu, C.-Y., Gonzalez,

R. L., Yu, Y.-J., Kim, P., Nuckolls, C. & Shepard, K. L. Label-free single-molecule detection of DNA-hybridization kinetics with a carbon nanotube field-effect transistor. _Nat.

Nanotechnol._ 6, 125–132 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Guo, X. F., Small, J. P., Klare, J. E., Wang, Y. L., Purewal, M. S., Tam, I. W., Hong, B. H., Caldwell, R., Huang, L. M.,

O'Brien, S., Yan, J. M., Breslow, R., Wind, S. J., Hone, J., Kim, P. & Nuckolls, C. Covalently bridging gaps in single-walled carbon nanotubes with conducting molecules. _Science_

311, 356–359 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Feldman, A. K., Steigerwald, M. L., Guo, X. F. & Nuckolls, C. Molecular electronic devices based on single-walled carbon nanotube

electrodes. _Acc. Chem. Res._ 41, 1731–1741 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Liu, S., Zhang, X. Y., Luo, W. X., Wang, Z. X., Guo, X. F., Steigerwald, M. L. & Fang, X. H.

Single-molecule detection of proteins using aptamer-functionalized molecular electronic devices. _Angew. Chem. Int. Ed._ 50, 2496–2502 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Mohanty, N.

& Berry, V. Graphene-based single-bacterium resolution biodevice and DNA transistor: interfacing graphene derivatives with nanoscale and microscale biocomponents. _Nano Lett._ 8,

4469–4476 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dong, X. C., Shi, Y. M., Huang, W., Chen, P. & Li, L.-J. Electrical detection of DNA hybridization with single-base specificity using

transistors based on CVD-grown graphene sheets. _Adv. Mater._ 22, 1649–1653 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Mao, S., Lu, G. H., Yu, K. H., Bo, Z. & Chen, J. H. Specific protein

detection using thermally reduced graphene oxide sheet decorated with gold nanoparticle-antibody conjugates. _Adv. Mater._ 22, 3521–3526 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Huang, Y. X.,

Dong, X. C., Shi, Y. M., Li, C. M., Li, L.-J. & Chen, P. Nanoelectronic biosensors based on CVD grown graphene. _Nanoscale_ 2, 1485–1488 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Waldmann, D., Jobst, J., Speck, F., Seyller, T., Krieger, M. & Weber, H. B. Bottom-gated epitaxial graphene. _Nat. Mater._ 10, 357–360 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ang, P. K.,

Chen, W., Wee, A. T. S. & Loh, K. P. Solution-gated epitaxial graphene as pH sensor. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 130, 14392–14393 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ohno, Y., Maehashi, K.,

Yamashiro, Y. & Matsumoto, K. Electrolyte-gated graphene field-effect transistors for detecting pH and protein adsorption. _Nano Lett._ 9, 3318–3322 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  * Ohno, Y., Maehashi, K. & Matsumoto, K. Label-free biosensors based on aptamer-modified graphene field-effect transistors. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 132, 18012–18013 (2010). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * He, Q. Y., Sudibya, H. G., Yin, Z. Y., Wu, S. X., Li, H., Boey, F., Huang, W., Chen, P. & Zhang, H. Centimeter-long and large-scale micropatterns of reduced graphene

oxide films: fabrication and sensing applications. _ACS Nano_ 4, 3201–3208 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sudibya, H. G., He, Q. Y., Zhang, H. & Chen, P. Electrical detection of

metal ions using filed-effect transistors based on micropatterned reduced graphene oxide films. _ACS Nano_ 5, 1990–1994 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dankerl, M., Hauf, M. V.,

Lippert, A., Hess, L. H., Birner, S., Sharp, I. D., Mahmood, A., Mallet, P., Veuillen, J.-Y., Stutzmann, M. & Garrido, J. A. Graphene solution-gated field-effect transistor array for

sensing applications. _Adv. Funct. Mater._ 20, 3117–3124 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cohen-Karni, T., Qing, Q., Li, Q., Fang, Y. & Lieber, C. M. Graphene and nanowire

transistors for cellular interfaces and electrical recording. _Nano Lett._ 10, 1098–1102 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hess, L. H., Jansen, M., Maybeck, V., Hauf, M. V., Seifert,

M., Stutzmann, M., Sharp, I. D., Offenhausser, A. & Garrido, J. A. Graphene transistor arrays for recording action potentials from electrogenic cells. _Adv. Mater._ 23, 5045–5049 (2011).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cao, X. H., He, Q. Y., Shi, W. H., Li, B., Zeng, Z. Y., Shi, Y. M., Yan, Q. Y. & Zhang, H. Graphene oxide as a carbon source for controlled growth of

carbon nanowires. _Small_ 7, 1199–1202 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yin, Z. Y., He, Q. Y., Huang, X., Zhang, J., Wu, S. X., Chen, P., Lu, G., Chen, P., Zhang, Q. C., Yan, Q. Y.,

Zhang, H. & Real-time, D. N. A. detection using Pt nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide field-effect transistors. _Nanoscale_ 4, 293–297 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Agarwal, S., Zhou, X. Z., Ye, F., He, Q. Y., Chen, G. C. K., Soo, J., Boey, F., Zhang, H. & Chen, P. Interfacing live cells with nanocarbon substrates. _Langmuir_ 26, 2244–2247 (2010).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We acknowledge primary financial support from MOST (2009CB623703 and 2012CB921404), NSFC (20833001, 51121091, 2112016 and

21003002), FANEDD (2007B21), 111 Project (B08001) and BSTSP (2009A01). We also acknowledge Michael Steigerwald (Columbia University) for helpful discussions. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND

AFFILIATIONS * Center for Nanochemistry, Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences (BNLMS), State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, College of

Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, PR China Song Liu & Xuefeng Guo * Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, PR China

Xuefeng Guo Authors * Song Liu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xuefeng Guo View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Xuefeng Guo. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative

Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Liu, S.,

Guo, X. Carbon nanomaterials field-effect-transistor-based biosensors. _NPG Asia Mater_ 4, e23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2012.42 Download citation * Received: 19 February 2012 *

Revised: 26 June 2012 * Accepted: 17 July 2012 * Published: 17 August 2012 * Issue Date: August 2012 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2012.42 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the

following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer

Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative KEYWORDS * biosensor * carbon nanotube * field-effect transistor * graphene