Clinical utility gene card for: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Clinical utility gene card for: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Play all audios:

Loading...

1. DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS 1.1 NAME OF THE DISEASE (SYNONYMS) Multiple endocrine neoplasia 2A (MEN 2A), multiple endocrine neoplasia 2B (MEN 2B), familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC).


1.2 OMIM# OF THE DISEASE MEN 2A: 171400; MEN 2B: 162300; FMTC: 155240. 1.3 NAME OF THE ANALYSED GENES OR DNA/CHROMOSOME SEGMENTS _RET_ proto-oncogene/10q11.2. 1.4 OMIM# OF THE GENE(S)


164761. 1.5 MUTATIONAL SPECTRUM Mostly point mutations, insertions of few nucleotides, small indels. Presently mutations are described in exons 5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16.1, 2, 3, 4 1.6


ANALYTICAL METHODS Bidirectional sequencing of coding regions. 1.7 ANALYTICAL VALIDATION Direct sequencing of both strands, verification of sequence results with genomic DNA from the second


blood sample. External validation through exchange of DNA control samples with other diagnostic institutions. 1.8 ESTIMATED FREQUENCY OF THE DISEASE (INCIDENCE AT BIRTH (‘BIRTH PREVALENCE’)


OR POPULATION PREVALENCE) 1 per 30 000. 1.9 IF APPLICABLE, PREVALENCE IN THE ETHNIC GROUP OF INVESTIGATED PERSON Not available. 1.10 DIAGNOSTIC SETTING Comment: Pre-implantation/prenatal


diagnostics is rarely done because adequate prevention/therapy of the associated diseases is available. Theoretically, we would recommend pre-implantation diagnosis in MEN 2B families, but


these cases are very rare. 2. TEST CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY (PROPORTION OF POSITIVE TESTS IF THE GENOTYPE IS PRESENT) About 98%. 2.2 ANALYTICAL SPECIFICITY (PROPORTION OF


NEGATIVE TESTS IF THE GENOTYPE IS NOT PRESENT) About 98%. 2.3 CLINICAL SENSITIVITY (PROPORTION OF POSITIVE TESTS IF THE DISEASE IS PRESENT) The clinical sensitivity can be dependent on


variable factors such as age or family history. In such cases a general statement should be given, even if a quantification can only be made case by case. About 97%.5 2.4 CLINICAL


SPECIFICITY (PROPORTION OF NEGATIVE TESTS IF THE DISEASE IS NOT PRESENT) The clinical specificity can be dependent on variable factors such as age or family history. In such cases a general


statement should be given, even if a quantification can only be made case by case. About 98%. 2.5 POSITIVE CLINICAL PREDICTIVE VALUE (LIFETIME RISK OF DEVELOPING THE DISEASE IF THE TEST IS


POSITIVE) Depending on the specific codon mutated: _MEN 2A_: frequency of MTC 90–95%, pheochromocytoma 40–50%, hyperparathyroidism 10–20%. _MEN 2B_: frequency of MTC 100%, pheochromocytoma


50%, hyperparathyroidism 0%. _FMTC_: frequency of MTC 80%, rarely pheochromocytoma/parathyroid disease (below 5%).6, 7, 8 2.6 NEGATIVE CLINICAL PREDICTIVE VALUE (PROBABILITY OF NOT


DEVELOPING THE DISEASE IF THE TEST IS NEGATIVE) Assume an increased risk based on family history for a non-affected person. Allelic and locus heterogeneity may need to be considered. Index


case in that family had been tested: About 98%. Index case in that family had not been tested: Depending on age, phenotype and number of family members under investigation. 3. CLINICAL


UTILITY In MEN 2, DNA analysis has obtained a central role in diagnosis and management. For this reason it is inconceivable that in MEN 2 families patients may refuse early DNA analysis for


their children at risk. Delay in treatment may have serious consequences for survival and quality of life. 3.1 (DIFFERENTIAL) DIAGNOSIS: THE TESTED PERSON IS CLINICALLY AFFECTED (To be


answered if in 1.10 ‘A’ was marked) If a person is clinically affected with MTC, about 70–75% of cases are sporadic, the remaining 25–30% belong to the hereditary variety (MEN 2/FMTC). In


all cases of MTC genetic testing for mutations in the _RET_ proto-oncogene is recommended.1 The probability that an individual with apparent sporadic MTC will be found to have a _RET_


mutation is 1–7%.1, 9, 10 In rare families, both HSCR and MEN 2 appear to segregate with germline _RET_ mutations in codon 609, 611, 618, or 620.11, 12 3.1.1 CAN A DIAGNOSIS BE MADE OTHER


THAN THROUGH A GENETIC TEST? 3.1.2 DESCRIBE THE BURDEN OF ALTERNATIVE DIAGNOSTIC METHODS TO THE PATIENT? In the past, pentagastrin and calcium infusion tests were used to stimulate


calcitonin secretion by thyroid C-cells, but nowadays _RET_-mutation screening is available for familial MTC and thus these tests have lost their clinical significance with respect to


diagnosis. The widespread availability of _RET_ gene mutation analysis and prophylactic thyroidectomy in MEN 2 disease-gene carriers has made periodical C-cell stimulation tests largely


obsolete for detection of MTC in MEN 2 families. For detection of MTC, C-cell stimulation tests are useful for family members who refuse DNA analysis. In addition, preoperatively it may


facilitate a decision with regard to the extensiveness of the surgical procedure. Occasionally, MTCs do not secrete calcitonin,13, 14 but this has not been observed in MEN 2 gene carriers.


Tests for pheochromocytoma and HPT significantly add to the burden. 3.1.3 HOW IS THE COST EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE DIAGNOSTIC METHODS TO BE JUDGED? After 3–4 appointments with calcitonin


stimulation test the costs are equal to the molecular diagnostic test. Savings through unnecessary testing for pheochromocytoma and HPT further increase the cost effectiveness. 3.1.4 WILL


DISEASE MANAGEMENT BE INFLUENCED BY THE RESULT OF A GENETIC TEST? 3.2 PREDICTIVE SETTING: THE TESTED PERSON IS CLINICALLY UNAFFECTED BUT CARRIES AN INCREASED RISK BASED ON FAMILY HISTORY (To


be answered if in 1.10 ‘B’ was marked) 3.2.1 WILL THE RESULT OF A GENETIC TEST INFLUENCE LIFESTYLE AND PREVENTION? If the test result is positive (please describe): _Positive test result_:


Depending on the detected mutation the patient should undergo prophylactic thyroidectomy or yearly calcitonin measurement. Likewise, also depending on the detected mutation the patient


should undergo biochemical testing for pheochromocytoma and HPT. If the test result is negative (please describe): _Negative test result_: Person can be excluded from further evaluations.


3.2.2 WHICH OPTIONS IN VIEW OF LIFESTYLE AND PREVENTION DOES A PERSON AT RISK HAVE IF NO GENETIC TEST HAS BEEN DONE (PLEASE DESCRIBE)? Calcitonin test and clinical evaluation are necessary


every year, with an increasing risk of MTC development and development of lymph node and distant metastases. There is an increasing risk of developing pheochromocytoma or hyperparathyroidism


during one's lifetime. 3.3 GENETIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN FAMILY MEMBERS OF A DISEASED PERSON (To be answered if in 1.10 ‘C’ was marked) 3.3.1 DOES THE RESULT OF A GENETIC TEST RESOLVE THE


GENETIC SITUATION IN THAT FAMILY? Yes, autosomal dominant inheritance. 3.3.2 CAN A GENETIC TEST IN THE INDEX PATIENT SAVE GENETIC OR OTHER TESTS IN FAMILY MEMBERS? Early DNA analysis


(already at birth) may be considered as a safe clinical test with clinical consequences and makes periodical measurement of calcitonin levels and ultrasound redundant in non-carriers. 3.3.3


DOES A POSITIVE GENETIC TEST RESULT IN THE INDEX PATIENT ENABLE A PREDICTIVE TEST IN A FAMILY MEMBER? Yes. 3.4 PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS (To be answered if in 2.10 ‘D’ was marked) This is rarely


necessary, because the disease can be managed properly (prophylactic thyroidectomy at an adequate age determined by the respective _RET_ mutation, adrenalectomy in pre-symptomatic stage of


pheochromocytoma, parathyroidectomy in asymptomatic stage of hyperparathyroidism). 3.4.1 DOES A POSITIVE GENETIC TEST RESULT IN THE INDEX PATIENT ENABLE A PRENATAL DIAGNOSTIC? Yes, but this


is rarely done, because postnatal therapy is available. 4. IF APPLICABLE, FURTHER CONSEQUENCES OF TESTING Please assume that the result of a genetic test has no immediate medical


consequences. Is there any evidence that a genetic test is nevertheless useful for the patient or his/her relatives? (Please describe) Molecular diagnosis of the proband allows for a precise


recommendation of further therapy (prophylactic thyroidectomy at the appropriate age, depending on the respective _RET_ mutation) and also for recommendation concerning the commencement and


frequency of biochemical testing for pheochromocytoma and hyperparathyroidism. Cure of MTC is only possible as long as MTC is limited to the thyroid gland; therefore diagnosis at an early


stage is the prerequisite for cure. Genetic test allows for regular biochemical screening using epinephrine and nor-epinephrine analysis to prevent hypertensive crisis induced by


pheochromocytoma,16 and regular serum calcium and parathyroid hormone measurement to diagnose hyperparathyroidism at an early stage.15 Molecular diagnosis of the proband allows for an


accurate and faster diagnosis in first-degree relatives. REFERENCES * Kloos RT, Eng C, Evans DB _et al_: Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association.


_Thyroid_ 2009; 19: 565–612. Article  Google Scholar  * Frank-Raue K, Rondot S, Raue F : Molecular genetics and phenomics of RET mutations: impact on prognosis of MTC. _Mol Cell Endocrinol_


2010; 322: 2–7. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Elisei R, Romei C, Cosci B _et al_: RET genetic screening in patients with medullary thyroid cancer and their relatives: experience with 807


individuals at one center. _J Clin Endocrinol Metab_ 2007; 92: 4725–4729. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * de Groot JW, Links TP, Plukker JT, Lips CJ, Hofstra RM : RET as a diagnostic and


therapeutic target in sporadic and hereditary endocrine tumors. _Endocr Rev_ 2006; 27: 535–560. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Romei C, Mariotti S, Fugazzola L _et al_: Multiple endocrine


neoplasia type 2 syndromes (MEN 2): results from the ItaMEN network analysis on the prevalence of different genotypes and phenotypes. _Eur J Endocrinol_ 2010; 163: 301–308. Article  CAS 


Google Scholar  * Machens A, Niccoli-Sire P, Hoegel J _et al_: Early malignant progression of hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. _N Engl J Med_ 2003; 349: 1517–1525. Article  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Frank-Raue K, Rybicki LA, Erlic Z _et al_: Risk profiles and penetrance estimations in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A caused by germline RET mutations located in exon 10.


_Hum Mutat_ 2010; 32: 51–58. Article  Google Scholar  * Raue F, Frank-Raue K : Update multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. _Fam Cancer_ 2010; 9: 449–457. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *


Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A _et al_: Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. _J Clin Endocrinol Metab_ 2001; 86: 5658–5671. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wiench M,


Wygoda Z, Gubala E _et al_: Estimation of risk of inherited medullary thyroid carcinoma in apparent sporadic patients. _J Clin Oncol_ 2001; 19: 1374–1380. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *


Hansford JR, Mulligan LM : Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and RET: from neoplasia to neurogenesis. _J Med Genet_ 2000; 37: 817–827. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Brooks AS, Oostra BA,


Hofstra RM : Studying the genetics of Hirschsprung's disease: unraveling an oligogenic disorder. _Clin Genet_ 2005; 67: 6–14. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang TS, Ocal IT, Sosa JA,


Cox H, Roman S : Medullary thyroid carcinoma without marked elevation of calcitonin: a diagnostic and surveillance dilemma. _Thyroid_ 2008; 18: 889–894. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dora


JM, Canalli MH, Capp C, Punales MK, Vieira JG, Maia AL : Normal perioperative serum calcitonin levels in patients with advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma: case report and review of the


literature. _Thyroid_ 2008; 18: 895–899. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Raue F, Kraimps JL, Dralle H _et al_: Primary hyperparathyroidism in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. _J Intern


Med_ 1995; 238: 369–373. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ilias I : Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma with special emphasis on MEN2 syndrome. _Hormones (Athens)_ 2009; 8:


111–116. Article  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by EuroGentest, an EU-FP6-supported NoE, contract number 512148 (EuroGentest Unit 3: ‘Clinical


genetics, community genetics and public health’, Workpackage 3.2). AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Endocrine Practice and Molecular Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany Friedhelm


Raue, Susanne Rondot, Egbert Schulze & Karin Frank-Raue * Maria Sklodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland Sylwia Szpak-Ulczok & Barbara


Jarzab Authors * Friedhelm Raue View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Susanne Rondot View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Egbert Schulze View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Sylwia Szpak-Ulczok View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Barbara Jarzab View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Karin Frank-Raue View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Friedhelm Raue. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no


conflict of interest. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Raue, F., Rondot, S., Schulze, E. _et al._ Clinical utility gene card for:


multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. _Eur J Hum Genet_ 20, 3 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2011.142 Download citation * Published: 24 August 2011 * Issue Date: January 2012 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2011.142 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not


currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative