Patterns of authorship in the ipcc working group iii report

Patterns of authorship in the ipcc working group iii report

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has completed its Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Here, we explore the social scientific networks informing Working Group III


(WGIII) assessment of mitigation for the AR5. Identifying authors’ institutional pathways, we highlight the persistence and extent of North–South inequalities in the authorship of the


report, revealing the dominance of US and UK institutions as training sites for WGIII authors. Examining patterns of co-authorship between WGIII authors, we identify the unevenness in


co-authoring relations, with a small number of authors co-writing regularly and indicative of an epistemic community’s influence over the IPCC’s definition of mitigation. These co-authoring


networks follow regional patterns, with significant EU–BRICS collaboration and authors from the US relatively insular. From a disciplinary perspective, economists, engineers, physicists and


natural scientists remain central to the process, with insignificant participation of scholars from the humanities. The shared training and career paths made apparent through our analysis


suggest that the idea that broader geographic participation may lead to a wider range of viewpoints and cultural understandings of climate change mitigation may not be as sound as previously


thought. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to


this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy


now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer


support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS BACK TO BASICS FOR THE IPCC: APPLYING LESSONS FROM AR6 TO THE SEVENTH ASSESSMENT CYCLE Article Open access 14 June 2024 THE PARADOX OF


COLLECTIVE CLIMATE ACTION IN RURAL U.S. ECOVILLAGES: ETHNOGRAPHIC REFLECTIONS AND PERSPECTIVES Article Open access 26 March 2024 ‘IS CLIMATE SCIENCE TAKING OVER THE SCIENCE?’: A CORPUS-BASED


STUDY OF COMPETING STANCES ON _BIAS_, _DOGMA_ AND _EXPERTISE_ IN THE BLOGOSPHERE Article Open access 15 September 2020 REFERENCES * Hulme, M. & Mahoney, M. What do we know about the


IPCC? _Prog. Phys. Geogr._ 34, 705–718 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Agrawala, S. Context and early origins of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. _Climatic Change_ 39,


605–620 (1998). Article  Google Scholar  * Agrawala, S. Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. _Climatic Change_ 39, 621–642 (1998). Article  Google


Scholar  * Biermann, F. Institutions for scientific advice: Global environmental assessments and their influence in developing countries. _Glob. Gov._ 8, 195–219 (2002). Article  Google


Scholar  * Hughes, H. Bourdieu and the IPCC’s symbolic power. _Glob. Environ. Polit._ (in the press). * Kandlikar, M. & Sagar, A. Climate change research and analysis in India: An


integrated assessment of a south–north divide. _Glob. Environ. Change_ 9, 119–138 (1999). Article  Google Scholar  * Demeritt, D. The construction of global warming and the politics of


science. _Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr._ 91, 307–37 (2001). Article  Google Scholar  * Shackley, S. & Wynne, B. Global Climate Change: The mutual construction of an emergent science-policy


domain. _Sci. Public Policy_ 22, 218–230 (1995). Google Scholar  * Lahsen, M. in _Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance_ (eds Jasanoff, S. & Martello, M. L.) Ch.


6, 151–172 (MIT Press, 2004). Google Scholar  * Siebenhuner, B. The changing role of nation states in international environmental assessments—the case of the IPCC. _Glob. Environ. Change_


13, 113–123 (2003). Article  Google Scholar  * Skodvin, T. _Structure and Agent in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change: An Empirical Case Study of Science-Policy Interaction in the


Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change_ (Kluwer Academic, 2000). Book  Google Scholar  * Boehmer-Christiansen, S. Britain and the international panel on climate change: The impacts of


scientific advice on global warming Part II: The domestic story of the British response to climate change. _Environ. Polit._ 4, 175–196 (1995). Article  Google Scholar  * Edwards, P. N.


Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. _Sci. Cult._ 8, 437–472 (1999). Article  Google Scholar  * Hulme, M. Geographical work at the


boundaries of climate change. _Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr._ 33, 5–11 (2007). Article  Google Scholar  * Miller, C. in _States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order_ (ed


Jasanoff, S.) Ch. 3, 46–66 (Routledge, 2004). Google Scholar  * Bjurström, A. & Polk, M. Physical and economic bias in climate change research. A scientometric study of IPCC third


assessment report. _Climatic Change_ 108, 1–22 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Ho-Lem, C., Zerriffi, H. & Kandlikar, M. Who participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate


Change and why: A quantitative assessment of the national representation of authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. _Glob. Environ. Change_ 21, 1308–1317 (2011). Article 


Google Scholar  * Karlsson, S., Srebotnjak, T. & Gonzales, P. Understanding the north–south knowledge divide and its implications for policy: A quantitative analysis of the generation of


scientific knowledge in the environmental sciences. _Environ. Sci. Policy_ 10, 668–684 (2007). Article  Google Scholar  * Vasileiadou, E., Heimeriks, G. & Petersen, A. C. Exploring the


impact of IPCC assessment reports on science. _Environ. Sci. Policy_ 14, 1052–1061 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Yearley, S. Sociology and climate change after Kyoto: What roles for


social science in understanding climate change? _Curr. Sociol._ 57, 389–405 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Victor, D. Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy.


_Nature_ 520, 27–29 (2015). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hart, D. M. & Victor, D. G. Scientific Elites and the making of United-States-policy for climate-change research, 1957–74.


_Soc. Stud. Sci._ 23, 643–680 (1993). Article  Google Scholar  * Hecht, A. D. & Tirpak, D. Framework agreement on climate-change—a scientific and policy history. _Climatic Change_ 29,


371–402 (1995). Article  Google Scholar  * IPCC _Selection of Lead Authors (CLA and LA) and Review Editors for The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)_ (IPCC, 2010);


http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/bureau-sessions/bureau41rep.pdf Google Scholar  * Haas, P. M. (ed.) _Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination. Special Issue_ Vol. 46 (International


Organization, 1992). * Collins, H. M. Public experiments and displays of virtuosity: The core-set revisited. _Soc. Stud. Sci._ 18, 715–748 (1988). Article  Google Scholar  * Crane, D.


_Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities_ (Univ. Chicago Press, 1972). Google Scholar  * Hulme, M. & Mahoney, M. Climate panel is ripe for examination.


_Nature_ 502, 604 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Edenhofer, O. & Minx, J. Mapmakers and navigators, facts and values. _Science_ 345, 36–37 (2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Shove,


E. Beyond the ABC: Climate change and theories of social change. _Environ. Plan. A_ 42, 1273–1285 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Bodin, O. & Prell, C. (eds) _Social Networks and


Natural Resource Management. Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance_ Ch. 14, 347–373 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011). * Rantala, S. _Knowledge and Brokerage in REDD + Policy


Making: A Policy Network Analysis of the Case of Tanzania_ Working Paper No. 201203 (Sustainability Science Program, Harvard University, 2012) * Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M.-G. &


Freeman, L. C. _Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis_ (Analytic Technologies, 2010). Google Scholar  * Burt, R. S. _Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition_


(Harvard Univ. Press, 1992). Google Scholar  * Brass, D. J. in _Research in Politics and Society_ (eds Moore, G. & Whitt, J. A.) 295–323 (JAI, 1992). Google Scholar  Download references


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge the assistance provided by M. Calvet-Mir in data collection and J. L. Molina in data analysis. E.C. and L.C.-M. acknowledge the financial support of


the Biodiversa Framework Project INVALUABLE: Values, Markets, and Policies for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (PRI-PIMBDV-2011-1072). E.C. has also received support from the Spanish


Research, Development and Innovation Secretariat through a ‘Ramón y Cajal’ research fellowship (RYC-2010-07183). AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * Hannah Hughes Present address: Present


address: Department of Politics and International Relations, Cardiff University, Law Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK., AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Universitat Autònoma de


Barcelona, Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Edifici ICTA-ICP, c/de les Columnes s/n Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain, Esteve Corbera * Universitat Oberta de Catalunya,


Internet Interdisciplinary Institute, Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 5 Castelldefels Barcelona 08860, Spain, Laura Calvet-Mir * Via Roma 36, Mezzolombardo, 38017 Trentino, Italy Hannah Hughes *


University of Ottawa, School of Political Studies, 120 University Avenue Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada, Matthew Paterson Authors * Esteve Corbera View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Laura Calvet-Mir View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hannah Hughes View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Matthew Paterson View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS E.C. and M.P. had


the original idea for the article. L.C.-M. and M.P. developed the social network analysis for training and co-authoring patterns. E.C. analysed the authors’ disciplinary backgrounds. H.H.


provided important background concerning the existing literature on the sociology of the IPCC, and contributed to data collection and analysis. M.P. and E.C. developed the first draft of the


article, and all four authors extensively revised and edited the text. E.C. completed and edited the final version of the article and all Supplementary Information. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR


Correspondence to Esteve Corbera. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (PDF 1370


KB) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (XLSX 398 KB) RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Corbera, E., Calvet-Mir, L., Hughes, H. _et al._ Patterns of


authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. _Nature Clim Change_ 6, 94–99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2782 Download citation * Received: 01 April 2015 * Accepted: 03 August


2015 * Published: 07 September 2015 * Issue Date: January 2016 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2782 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read


this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative