Play all audios:
ABSTRACT The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has completed its Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). Here, we explore the social scientific networks informing Working Group III
(WGIII) assessment of mitigation for the AR5. Identifying authors’ institutional pathways, we highlight the persistence and extent of North–South inequalities in the authorship of the
report, revealing the dominance of US and UK institutions as training sites for WGIII authors. Examining patterns of co-authorship between WGIII authors, we identify the unevenness in
co-authoring relations, with a small number of authors co-writing regularly and indicative of an epistemic community’s influence over the IPCC’s definition of mitigation. These co-authoring
networks follow regional patterns, with significant EU–BRICS collaboration and authors from the US relatively insular. From a disciplinary perspective, economists, engineers, physicists and
natural scientists remain central to the process, with insignificant participation of scholars from the humanities. The shared training and career paths made apparent through our analysis
suggest that the idea that broader geographic participation may lead to a wider range of viewpoints and cultural understandings of climate change mitigation may not be as sound as previously
thought. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to
this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy
now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer
support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS BACK TO BASICS FOR THE IPCC: APPLYING LESSONS FROM AR6 TO THE SEVENTH ASSESSMENT CYCLE Article Open access 14 June 2024 THE PARADOX OF
COLLECTIVE CLIMATE ACTION IN RURAL U.S. ECOVILLAGES: ETHNOGRAPHIC REFLECTIONS AND PERSPECTIVES Article Open access 26 March 2024 ‘IS CLIMATE SCIENCE TAKING OVER THE SCIENCE?’: A CORPUS-BASED
STUDY OF COMPETING STANCES ON _BIAS_, _DOGMA_ AND _EXPERTISE_ IN THE BLOGOSPHERE Article Open access 15 September 2020 REFERENCES * Hulme, M. & Mahoney, M. What do we know about the
IPCC? _Prog. Phys. Geogr._ 34, 705–718 (2010). Article Google Scholar * Agrawala, S. Context and early origins of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. _Climatic Change_ 39,
605–620 (1998). Article Google Scholar * Agrawala, S. Structural and process history of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. _Climatic Change_ 39, 621–642 (1998). Article Google
Scholar * Biermann, F. Institutions for scientific advice: Global environmental assessments and their influence in developing countries. _Glob. Gov._ 8, 195–219 (2002). Article Google
Scholar * Hughes, H. Bourdieu and the IPCC’s symbolic power. _Glob. Environ. Polit._ (in the press). * Kandlikar, M. & Sagar, A. Climate change research and analysis in India: An
integrated assessment of a south–north divide. _Glob. Environ. Change_ 9, 119–138 (1999). Article Google Scholar * Demeritt, D. The construction of global warming and the politics of
science. _Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr._ 91, 307–37 (2001). Article Google Scholar * Shackley, S. & Wynne, B. Global Climate Change: The mutual construction of an emergent science-policy
domain. _Sci. Public Policy_ 22, 218–230 (1995). Google Scholar * Lahsen, M. in _Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance_ (eds Jasanoff, S. & Martello, M. L.) Ch.
6, 151–172 (MIT Press, 2004). Google Scholar * Siebenhuner, B. The changing role of nation states in international environmental assessments—the case of the IPCC. _Glob. Environ. Change_
13, 113–123 (2003). Article Google Scholar * Skodvin, T. _Structure and Agent in the Scientific Diplomacy of Climate Change: An Empirical Case Study of Science-Policy Interaction in the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change_ (Kluwer Academic, 2000). Book Google Scholar * Boehmer-Christiansen, S. Britain and the international panel on climate change: The impacts of
scientific advice on global warming Part II: The domestic story of the British response to climate change. _Environ. Polit._ 4, 175–196 (1995). Article Google Scholar * Edwards, P. N.
Global climate science, uncertainty and politics: Data-laden models, model-filtered data. _Sci. Cult._ 8, 437–472 (1999). Article Google Scholar * Hulme, M. Geographical work at the
boundaries of climate change. _Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr._ 33, 5–11 (2007). Article Google Scholar * Miller, C. in _States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order_ (ed
Jasanoff, S.) Ch. 3, 46–66 (Routledge, 2004). Google Scholar * Bjurström, A. & Polk, M. Physical and economic bias in climate change research. A scientometric study of IPCC third
assessment report. _Climatic Change_ 108, 1–22 (2011). Article Google Scholar * Ho-Lem, C., Zerriffi, H. & Kandlikar, M. Who participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change and why: A quantitative assessment of the national representation of authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. _Glob. Environ. Change_ 21, 1308–1317 (2011). Article
Google Scholar * Karlsson, S., Srebotnjak, T. & Gonzales, P. Understanding the north–south knowledge divide and its implications for policy: A quantitative analysis of the generation of
scientific knowledge in the environmental sciences. _Environ. Sci. Policy_ 10, 668–684 (2007). Article Google Scholar * Vasileiadou, E., Heimeriks, G. & Petersen, A. C. Exploring the
impact of IPCC assessment reports on science. _Environ. Sci. Policy_ 14, 1052–1061 (2011). Article Google Scholar * Yearley, S. Sociology and climate change after Kyoto: What roles for
social science in understanding climate change? _Curr. Sociol._ 57, 389–405 (2009). Article Google Scholar * Victor, D. Climate change: Embed the social sciences in climate policy.
_Nature_ 520, 27–29 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * Hart, D. M. & Victor, D. G. Scientific Elites and the making of United-States-policy for climate-change research, 1957–74.
_Soc. Stud. Sci._ 23, 643–680 (1993). Article Google Scholar * Hecht, A. D. & Tirpak, D. Framework agreement on climate-change—a scientific and policy history. _Climatic Change_ 29,
371–402 (1995). Article Google Scholar * IPCC _Selection of Lead Authors (CLA and LA) and Review Editors for The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)_ (IPCC, 2010);
http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/bureau-sessions/bureau41rep.pdf Google Scholar * Haas, P. M. (ed.) _Knowledge, Power and International Policy Coordination. Special Issue_ Vol. 46 (International
Organization, 1992). * Collins, H. M. Public experiments and displays of virtuosity: The core-set revisited. _Soc. Stud. Sci._ 18, 715–748 (1988). Article Google Scholar * Crane, D.
_Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities_ (Univ. Chicago Press, 1972). Google Scholar * Hulme, M. & Mahoney, M. Climate panel is ripe for examination.
_Nature_ 502, 604 (2013). Article Google Scholar * Edenhofer, O. & Minx, J. Mapmakers and navigators, facts and values. _Science_ 345, 36–37 (2014). Article Google Scholar * Shove,
E. Beyond the ABC: Climate change and theories of social change. _Environ. Plan. A_ 42, 1273–1285 (2010). Article Google Scholar * Bodin, O. & Prell, C. (eds) _Social Networks and
Natural Resource Management. Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance_ Ch. 14, 347–373 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011). * Rantala, S. _Knowledge and Brokerage in REDD + Policy
Making: A Policy Network Analysis of the Case of Tanzania_ Working Paper No. 201203 (Sustainability Science Program, Harvard University, 2012) * Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M.-G. &
Freeman, L. C. _Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis_ (Analytic Technologies, 2010). Google Scholar * Burt, R. S. _Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition_
(Harvard Univ. Press, 1992). Google Scholar * Brass, D. J. in _Research in Politics and Society_ (eds Moore, G. & Whitt, J. A.) 295–323 (JAI, 1992). Google Scholar Download references
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors acknowledge the assistance provided by M. Calvet-Mir in data collection and J. L. Molina in data analysis. E.C. and L.C.-M. acknowledge the financial support of
the Biodiversa Framework Project INVALUABLE: Values, Markets, and Policies for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (PRI-PIMBDV-2011-1072). E.C. has also received support from the Spanish
Research, Development and Innovation Secretariat through a ‘Ramón y Cajal’ research fellowship (RYC-2010-07183). AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * Hannah Hughes Present address: Present
address: Department of Politics and International Relations, Cardiff University, Law Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK., AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Edifici ICTA-ICP, c/de les Columnes s/n Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain, Esteve Corbera * Universitat Oberta de Catalunya,
Internet Interdisciplinary Institute, Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 5 Castelldefels Barcelona 08860, Spain, Laura Calvet-Mir * Via Roma 36, Mezzolombardo, 38017 Trentino, Italy Hannah Hughes *
University of Ottawa, School of Political Studies, 120 University Avenue Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada, Matthew Paterson Authors * Esteve Corbera View author publications You can also search for
this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Laura Calvet-Mir View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hannah Hughes View author publications You can
also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Matthew Paterson View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS E.C. and M.P. had
the original idea for the article. L.C.-M. and M.P. developed the social network analysis for training and co-authoring patterns. E.C. analysed the authors’ disciplinary backgrounds. H.H.
provided important background concerning the existing literature on the sociology of the IPCC, and contributed to data collection and analysis. M.P. and E.C. developed the first draft of the
article, and all four authors extensively revised and edited the text. E.C. completed and edited the final version of the article and all Supplementary Information. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Correspondence to Esteve Corbera. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (PDF 1370
KB) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (XLSX 398 KB) RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Corbera, E., Calvet-Mir, L., Hughes, H. _et al._ Patterns of
authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. _Nature Clim Change_ 6, 94–99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2782 Download citation * Received: 01 April 2015 * Accepted: 03 August
2015 * Published: 07 September 2015 * Issue Date: January 2016 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2782 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read
this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative