How useful is the hit-6™ for measuring headache-related disability?

How useful is the hit-6™ for measuring headache-related disability?

Play all audios:

Loading...

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe boxed-textKawata AK _et al_. (2005) Psychometric properties of the HIT-6 among patients in a headache-specialty practice. _Headache_ 45: 638–643 In addition to its use in making diagnoses, assessment of headache impact is a useful guide to selecting treatment for and measuring clinical progress of this condition This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support REFERENCES * Stewart WF et al. (1999) Validity of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. _Pain_ 79: 291–301 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Stewart WF et al. (1999) An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score. _Neurology_ 53: 988–994 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kosinski M et al. (2003) A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. _Qual Life Res_ 12: 963–974 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ware JE et al. (1993) _SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide_. Boston: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute Google Scholar  * Lipton RB et al. (2000) Migraine, quality of life and depression: a population-based case–control study. _Neurology_ 55: 629–635 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lipton RB et al. (2000) Stratified care is more effective than step care strategies for migraine: results of the disability in strategies of care (DISC) study. _JAMA_ 284: 2599–2605 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The synopsis was written by Emma Campbell, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Professor of Neurology, Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health, and the Lotti and Bernard Benson Faculty Scholar, at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA Richard B Lipton Authors * Richard B Lipton View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS Richard B Lipton developed MIDAS but has no financial interest in it. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Lipton, R. How useful is the HIT-6™ for measuring headache-related disability?. _Nat Rev Neurol_ 2, 70–71 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0122 Download citation * Received: 13 October 2005 * Accepted: 16 November 2005 * Issue Date: February 2006 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0122 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe boxed-textKawata AK _et al_. (2005) Psychometric properties of the HIT-6 among patients in a headache-specialty practice. _Headache_ 45:


638–643 In addition to its use in making diagnoses, assessment of headache impact is a useful guide to selecting treatment for and measuring clinical progress of this condition This is a


preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per


year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated


during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support REFERENCES * Stewart WF et al. (1999) Validity of an


illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. _Pain_ 79: 291–301 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Stewart WF et al. (1999) An international study to


assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Score. _Neurology_ 53: 988–994 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kosinski M et al. (2003) A six-item short-form survey for


measuring headache impact: the HIT-6. _Qual Life Res_ 12: 963–974 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ware JE et al. (1993) _SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide_. Boston: New


England Medical Center, The Health Institute Google Scholar  * Lipton RB et al. (2000) Migraine, quality of life and depression: a population-based case–control study. _Neurology_ 55:


629–635 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lipton RB et al. (2000) Stratified care is more effective than step care strategies for migraine: results of the disability in strategies of care


(DISC) study. _JAMA_ 284: 2599–2605 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The synopsis was written by Emma Campbell, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.


AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Professor of Neurology, Professor of Epidemiology and Population Health, and the Lotti and Bernard Benson Faculty Scholar, at the Albert


Einstein College of Medicine, NY, USA Richard B Lipton Authors * Richard B Lipton View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar ETHICS DECLARATIONS


COMPETING INTERESTS Richard B Lipton developed MIDAS but has no financial interest in it. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Lipton, R. How


useful is the HIT-6™ for measuring headache-related disability?. _Nat Rev Neurol_ 2, 70–71 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0122 Download citation * Received: 13 October 2005 *


Accepted: 16 November 2005 * Issue Date: February 2006 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0122 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this


content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative