Play all audios:
Patients with cancer expect to derive a meaningful clinical benefit from anticancer treatments, especially considering that such therapies are associated with adverse events and, often,
substantial financial costs. We have evaluated new anticancer agents approved by the FDA in 2015 and 2016 using the ESMO Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale and ASCO Value Framework, and
conclude that many agents only offer marginal value. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS
Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more
Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full
article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs *
Contact customer support REFERENCES * Saltz, L. B. Progress in cancer care: the hope, the hype, and the gap between reality and perception. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 26, 5020–5021 (2008). Article
Google Scholar * Booth, C. M. & Eisenhauer, E. A. Progression-free survival: meaningful or simply measurable? _J. Clin. Oncol._ 30, 1030–1033 (2012). Article Google Scholar * Booth,
C. M. & Tannock, I. Reflections on medical oncology: 25 years of clinical trials — where have we come and where are we going? _J. Clin. Oncol._ 26, 6–8 (2008). Article Google Scholar *
Booth, C. M. _ et al_. Evolution of the randomized controlled trial in oncology over three decades. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 26, 5458–5464 (2008). Article Google Scholar * Seruga, B. _ et al_.
Absolute benefits of medical therapies in phase III clinical trials for breast and colorectal cancer. _Ann. Oncol._ 21, 1411–1418 (2010). Article CAS Google Scholar * Cherny, N. I. _ et
al_. A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology
Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS). _Ann. Oncol._ 26, 1547–1573 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * Schnipper, L. E. _ et al_. Updating the American Society of Clinical
Oncology value framework: revisions and reflections in response to comments received. _J. Clin. Oncol._ 34, 2925–2934 (2016). Article Google Scholar * Del Paggio, J. C. _ et al_. Do
contemporary randomized controlled trials meet ESMO thresholds for meaningful clinical benefit? _Ann. Oncol._ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw538 (2016). * Tap, W. D. _ et al_.
Olaratumab and doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone for treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma: an open-label phase 1b and randomised phase 2 trial. _Lancet_ 388, 488–497 (2016). Article CAS
Google Scholar * Schlumberger, M. _ et al_. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 372, 621–630 (2015). Article Google Scholar * Truven
Health Analytics. RED BOOK: a comprehensive, consistent drug pricing resource. _Micromedex_ http://micromedex.com/products/product-suites/clinical-knowledge/redbook (2017). Download
references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS C.M.B. is supported as the Canada Research Chair in Population Cancer Care. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Departments of Oncology and Public
Health Sciences, Queen's University, University Avenue, Kingston, K7L 3N6, Ontario, Canada Christopher M. Booth * Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of
Toronto, King's College Circus, Toronto, M5S, Ontario, Canada Joseph C. Del Paggio Authors * Christopher M. Booth View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed
Google Scholar * Joseph C. Del Paggio View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Christopher M. Booth. ETHICS
DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing financial interests. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION S1 (TABLE) Clinical benefit of anticancer agents
approved by the FDA in 2015–2016 (PDF 228 kb) POWERPOINT SLIDES POWERPOINT SLIDE FOR TABLE 1 RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Booth, C.,
Del Paggio, J. Approvals in 2016: questioning the clinical benefit of anticancer therapies. _Nat Rev Clin Oncol_ 14, 135–136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.18 Download
citation * Published: 20 February 2017 * Issue Date: March 2017 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.18 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to
read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing
initiative