Single-cell rna sequencing reveals b cell–related molecular biomarkers for alzheimer’s disease

Single-cell rna sequencing reveals b cell–related molecular biomarkers for alzheimer’s disease

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT In recent years, biomarkers have been integrated into the diagnostic process and have become increasingly indispensable for obtaining knowledge of the neurodegenerative processes in


Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in human blood have been reported to participate in a variety of neurodegenerative activities. Here, a single-cell RNA


sequencing analysis of PBMCs from 4 AD patients (2 in the early stage, 2 in the late stage) and 2 normal controls was performed to explore the differential cell subpopulations in PBMCs of AD


patients. A significant decrease in B cells was detected in the blood of AD patients. Furthermore, we further examined PBMCs from 43 AD patients and 41 normal subjects by fluorescence


activated cell sorting (FACS), and combined with correlation analysis, we found that the reduction in B cells was closely correlated with the patients’ Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores.


To confirm the role of B cells in AD progression, functional experiments were performed in early-stage AD mice in which fibrous plaques were beginning to appear; the results demonstrated


that B cell depletion in the early stage of AD markedly accelerated and aggravated cognitive dysfunction and augmented the Aβ burden in AD mice. Importantly, the experiments revealed 18


genes that were specifically upregulated and 7 genes that were specifically downregulated in B cells as the disease progressed, and several of these genes exhibited close correlation with


AD. These findings identified possible B cell-based AD severity, which are anticipated to be conducive to the clinical identification of AD progression. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY


OTHERS IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL BLOOD BIOMARKERS FOR EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE THROUGH IMMUNE LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Article Open access 04 November 2022 SINGLE-CELL RNA


SEQUENCING REVEALS PERIPHERAL IMMUNOLOGICAL FEATURES IN PARKINSON’S DISEASE Article Open access 04 October 2024 CLEARANCE AND TRANSPORT OF AMYLOID Β BY PERIPHERAL MONOCYTES CORRELATE WITH


ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE PROGRESSION Article Open access 12 September 2024 INTRODUCTION Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has long been one of the great challenges in medicine and imposes a constant


burden on our aging population. Recent statistics show that approximately 50 million people worldwide suffer from AD or some other form of dementia1. The World Health Organization has


estimated that the total number of people with dementia worldwide will reach 82 million by 2030 and 152 million by 20502. Of the top 10 leading causes of death based on United States cancer


statistics, cardiovascular disease ranks first, tumors rank second and AD ranks sixth3. AD, an insidious progressive neurodegenerative disease, is clinically characterized by cognitive


dysfunction, psychiatric symptoms, behavioral disorders, and even a gradual decline in the ability to carry out activities of daily living4,5. Considered a heterogeneous disease, the disease


may be attributed to family history, head trauma, low educational level, thyroid disease, too high or too low maternal reproductive age, and viral infection6. At present, AD can be


diagnosed by neuropsychological tests, hematological examinations, neuroimaging examinations, electroencephalograms, cerebrospinal fluid tests, genetic tests and so on7,8. In the past few


years, the International Working Group (IWG) has integrated biomarkers into the diagnostic process, and in 2014, the IWG began to divide AD biomarkers into diagnostic markers and progression


markers to cover all stages of the disease (from asymptomatic status to the most severe stage of dementia)9,10. Human blood, which can contain crucial biomarkers, has been used to reflect


the physiological and pathological condition of patients. The key role of peripheral blood in the diagnosis of AD has been identified in previous studies11,12, and peripheral blood


mononuclear cells (PBMCs) have been reported to play an active role in a variety of neurodegenerative events13. PBMCs consist of multiple cell subsets, which are commonly divided into


myeloid and lymphoid cells; myeloid cells comprise monocytes and their descendants, along with granulocytes such as neutrophils and basophils, while lymphoid cells primarily include T cells,


B cells and NK cells14. Total PBMC-based genome-wide expression measurements can detect the proportions of various cell subpopulations in a given sample13,15, whereas the lesser


transcriptional alterations in some subsets cannot be determined by single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of bulk PBMCs16. Thankfully, the reliable measurement of transcriptional


heterogeneity has been made possible by microfluidic control of cell capture and preparation of RNA-seq libraries from single individual cells, which has been successfully applied to


identify cell subsets and critical biomarkers in multiple distinct biological settings, such as neurogenesis, tumorigenesis and embryonic development17,18,19,20. Single-cell RNA-seq


possesses the capacity to identify specific biomarkers so that multiple candidate biomarkers can be selected for diagnostic and prognostic use. In the current study, differentially abundant


cell subpopulations among PBMCs and differentially expressed genes in B cells were identified in 4 AD patients and 2 controls by single-cell sequencing analysis. Moreover, we collected PBMCs


from 43 AD patients and 41 normal subjects for fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS), and some correlations were found among the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of AD patients,


the numerical variation of B cells and the changes in the expression of marker genes as the disease developed. The indispensable function of B cells in AD progression was further validated


using AD mice. We achieved proof-of-concept identification of possible pathogenic cell types and molecular biomarkers underlying AD, revealing the feasibility of identifying disease


biomarkers in specific cell types rather than whole blood; the development of an AD diagnostic or early warning kit based on single-cell RNA-seq should be an urgent priority. MATERIALS AND


METHODS PARTICIPANTS Two normal individuals (Normal-1 (N1) and Normal-2 (N2)) and four AD patients (2 with mild AD, designated Early AD-1 (EA1) and Early AD-2 (EA2)), and 2 with severe AD,


designated Late AD-1 (LA1) and Late AD-2 (LA2) were involved in single-cell sequencing analysis. Moreover, PBMCs from 43 AD patients and 41 normal subjects were collected for FACS and


correlation analysis with the patients’ CDR scores. The patients fulfilled the following inclusion criteria21: a clinical diagnosis of mild or severe AD, a Mini-Mental State Examination


(MMSE) score >19, an age range of 60–90 years, and stable administration of anti-dementia or mood-stabilizing medication. They were all informed of the purpose of the study and signed an


informed consent form. Detailed information on these patients is shown in Supplementary Table 1. PBMCs were collected from patients and controls. All procedures involving the participants


were approved by the Ethics Committee of Biomedical Research for West China Hospital (approval number 20150263; Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number ChiCTR1900022805), and this study was


conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING A 3.0 T magnetic resonance scanner (Ingenia, Philips, Netherlands) was used to detect cerebral structural


changes in AD patients. The protocol and parameters for T1-weighted (T1W) imaging in all participants were as follows: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 500/20 milliseconds (ms),


(number of signal averaged) NSA = 4, (field of view) FOV = 180 × 180 mm, matrix=224 × 224. The thickness of slices was set at 2 mm each. PBMC ISOLATION PBMCs in the blood samples obtained


from normal individuals (N1 and N2) and AD patients (EA1 and EA2 for early AD; LA1 and LA2 for late AD) were purified by Ficoll gradient separation according to the manufacturer’s


instructions (Ficoll-Paque Plus, GE Healthcare, Sweden). In short, 3 mL of Ficoll-Paque gradient was pipetted into two 15-mL centrifuge tubes. The blood was diluted at a ratio of 1:1 in


phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and carefully layered over the Ficoll-Paque gradient. The tubes were centrifuged for 30 min at 400 × _g_. The cell interface layer was harvested carefully (8 


mL/tube), and the cells were washed twice in PBS for 10 min each (at 100 × _g_). PBMCs were resuspended in 1 mL complete culture medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum and 1%


PS). Cells were counted using a hemocytometer and trypan blue. PBMCs at a density of 3 × 106 cells per tube were frozen in a liquid nitrogen tank. 10X GENOMICS SINGLE-CELL PACKAGE AND


LIBRARY PREPARATION Single-cell libraries were generated using a GemCode single-cell instrument and a 10x Genomics Single Cell 3′ Library & Gel Bead Kit v2 and Chip Kit according to the


kit manufacturer’s protocol (Ou Yi Bio, Shanghai)22. Briefly, PBMCs were suspended in 0.04% BSA–PBS and then counted with a Countess® II Automated Cell Counter. The cell concentration was


adjusted to the desired concentration of 1 × 106/mL. Approximately 13000 cells were added to each channel. Nanoliter-scale gel beads in emulsion (GEMs) containing barcode information were


generated and then reverse transcribed in a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad). PCR amplification was performed using cDNA as a template. Subsequently, the amplified cDNA was fragmented


into approximately 200–300 bp fragments by a Bioruptor sonication device, and the traditional second-generation sequencing process was followed, including, for example, sequencing linker P5


and sequencing primer R1. Finally, the DNA library was amplified by PCR. SINGLE-CELL RNA-SEQ The library was quantified using Qubit, and the eligible libraries were placed in cBot for bridge


amplification. All libraries prepared for this study were sequenced on a HiSeq 4000 system (Illumina) with 150 bp paired-end sequencing, and each library was sequenced for a whole lane.


Briefly, fluorophore-labeled deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) of A, T, G, and C were added during each cycle. According to AT and GC pairing, the corresponding dNTPs were bound to


the template DNA strand by DNA polymerase, and the unbound dNTPs were washed out. After removal, the binding position released a fluorescent signal that could be captured by the computer and


converted accordingly. Thereby, the base information for the binding position was obtained. The Cell Ranger software pipeline (version 2.2.0) provided by 10× Genomics was used to


demultiplex cellular barcodes, map reads to the genome and transcriptome using the Spliced Transcripts Alignment to a Reference (STAR) aligner, and downsample reads as required to generate


normalized aggregate data across samples, producing a matrix of gene counts versus cells. We processed the unique molecular identifier (UMI) count matrix using the R package Seurat23


(version 2.3.4). To remove low-quality cells and likely multiplet captures, which is a major concern in microdroplet-based experiments, we filtered out cells with UMI/gene numbers more than


4 standard deviations away from the mean value, assuming that the UMI/ gene numbers of the cells followed a Gaussian distribution. Following visual inspection of the distribution of cells by


the fraction of mitochondrial genes expressed, we further discarded low-quality cells in which >10% of the counts belonged to mitochondrial genes. After the application of these quality


control (QC) criteria, 46244 single cells (1304 cells filtered out from a total of 47548 cells) and 9279 genes remained and were included in downstream analyses. Library size normalization


was performed in Seurat on the filtered matrix to obtain the normalized count. DATA PROCESSING The raw image data files obtained by single-cell RNA sequencing were converted into the


original sequences by base-calling analysis. The resulting data were called raw data or raw reads. These results were stored in the FASTQ (.fq) file format, which contains the sequence


information (reads) and its corresponding sequencing quality information. The top variable genes across single cells were identified using the method described by Macosko et al.24. Briefly,


the average expression and dispersion were calculated for each gene, and the genes were subsequently divided into 18 bins based on expression. Principal component analysis (PCA) was


performed to reduce the dimensionality of the log-transformed gene-barcode matrices of the top variable genes. Cells were clustered based on a gene-based clustering approach and visualized


in 2 dimensions using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) dimensionality clustering analysis (tsne.fit_transform(data_zs)). The cell type signature genes are listed in Table


1, the number of each cell subsets shown in Supplementary Table 2. A likelihood ratio test that simultaneously tests for changes in mean expression and in the percentage of expressed cells


was used to identify significantly differentially expressed genes between clusters. The R package SingleR, a novel computational method for unbiased cell type recognition of single-cell


RNA-seq, was used to infer the cell origin of each single cell independently and identify cell types by referring to the transcriptomic datasets “Blueprint Epigenomics”25 and “Encode”26.


Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the Find Markers function (test.use =MAST) in Seurat, and Pearson correlations between samples were calculated in R (cor(data,


method = “pearson”)) based on the mean expression of the 693 highly variable genes. The criteria of _p_ value < 0.05 and |log2(fold change)| > 0.26 were set as the thresholds for


significantly differential expression. Heatmaps, volcano plots, and violin plots were generated using R. The enriched pathways associated with the differentially expressed genes were


analyzed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (https://www.kegg.jp/). Venn diagrams and circular heat maps were generated with TBtools


(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009). FLUORESCENCE-ACTIVATED CELL SORTING (FACS) PBMCs from 43 AD patients and 41 normal subjects were isolated by FACS to further validate the


results of single-cell sequencing. Briefly, all PBMCs were washed, counted and suspended in ice-cold PBS, and cell-surface antigen staining was subsequently performed. Monoclonal antibodies


against CD3, CD45, CD56, CD19 (CD45/CD56/CD19/CD3 detection kit, Beckman Coulter, USA) and CD16 (CD16-PE, Beckman Coulter, USA) were used in immunofluorescence staining. The stained cells


were analyzed and sorted by BD Influx (BD, USA), and data were analyzed using CytExpert 2.0. ANIMAL CARE AND GROUPING Sixteen-week-old APP/PS1 transgenic mice (AD mice) and wild-type (WT)


mice on a C57BL/6 genetic background were provided by the Center for Experimental Animals at Kunming Medical University. The animals were kept under standard conditions in a


specific-pathogen-free (SPF) laboratory. All experimental procedures, including animal care and testing, conformed to the Animal Care and Use Committee of Kunming Medical University


(kmmu2019058). All studies were conducted in accordance with the United States Public Health Service’s Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. AD mice were randomly divided into


an AD + B cell depletion treated (BCDT) group and an AD + PBS group. Mice in the AD + BCDT group received an intraperitoneal injection of 200 μL B cell depletion antibodies composed of 92 


μL PBS, 55.5 μL CD19 and 52.5 μL B220 (anti-mouse CD19: 5.41 mg/mL, Bioxcell, Catalog #BE0150; anti-mouse B220: 5.71 mg/mL, Bioxcell, Catalog #BE0067) once every 5 days for 3 consecutive


months, while the negative control mice received equivalent doses of PBS. OPEN FIELD TEST In this study, the open field test was mainly used to characterize the autonomous behavior,


exploratory behavior and anxiety-like behavior of mice in the WT, AD control and AD treatment groups in an unfamiliar environment. The experimental setup consisted of two parts: the open


field reaction box, which was 40 cm high with a 40 cm × 40 cm base and white interior walls, and the automatic data acquisition and processing system (Shanghai XinRuan Information Technology


Co.). The enclosed part of the reaction box had a square floor area composed of 16 squares of 10 cm × 10 cm, with a digital camera positioned 2 m above the floor of the box. Each animal was


placed in the center of the arena floor and had its behavior simultaneously videotaped and timed. Each mouse was observed for 10 min. The number of times the mouse reared and groomed as


well as the cumulative time spent rearing and grooming was recorded. Between tests, the inner walls and floor of the box were cleaned. MORRIS WATER MAZE TEST The Morris water maze was used


to evaluate the spatial memory and learning abilities of AD mice. The pool, measuring 1.8 m in diameter and filled to a depth of 0.5 m, was divided into 4 equal quadrants, with a small round


platform placed 1.5 cm below the surface of the water in the center of one quadrant. White food coloring was added to the water to hide the platform. The water maze experiment included a


place navigation test and a spatial probe test. In the navigation test, the mice were placed at the midpoint of one randomly selected quadrant, and the time that the mice took to find the


hidden platform (the latency) was recorded. For training, each mouse was released at the center of each of the 4 quadrants once per day for 5 days in a row; they were given up to 60 sec per


trial to find the platform. If the mice failed to find the platform within 60 s during a training trial, they were guided to the platform by laboratory staff. On the sixth day, the platform


was removed, and the spatial probe test began. The mice were placed in the water in the quadrant opposite the original location of the platform. The number of times each mouse crossed the


target region, and the time and last day of training of distance that the mice traveled before reaching the target region were recorded and measured. Finally, the mice were dried after each


experiment and returned to their home cages. The interval between training sessions was 15–20 min. Y-MAZE TEST Mice were subjected to the Y-maze test at 3 months after BCDT injection. The Y


maze consisted of three white plexiglass arms (each 35 cm long, 5 cm wide and 15 cm high) at an angle of 120° to each other. They were placed at the end of one arm and allowed to move


through the maze. This test was divided into the following two parts. (1) _Spontaneous alternating experiment:_ The order of entries into the three arms and the total number of entries into


each arm were recorded. The alteration rate was calculated as the number of alterations/(total number entries-2) × 100. (2) _Spatial reference memory:_ In the first training test, a certain


arm (the novel arm) was closed, and the mice were allowed to explore freely for 15 min. Before the second test, the animals were returned to their cages for 1 h. During the second trial, the


novel arm was made accessible, and the mice were allowed to move freely within the maze for 8 min. The number of times each mouse entered the novel arm and the total time spent in the novel


arm were measured and analyzed. TISSUE HARVEST Twenty-four hours after behavioral experiments, all mice were anesthetized, killed, and immediately perfused with precooled 0.9% normal saline


and 4% paraformaldehyde until the liver turned white and the body became stiff. Their brains were cut and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 72 h, and trimmed blocks of brain tissue were


dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. The region 2.66 mm~4.3 mm posterior to bregma was sectioned into coronal slices (5 μm thick), which were subsequently baked at 60 °C for 24 h and stored


at room temperature for subsequent staining. IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY STAINING The prepared brain sections were first deparaffinized and hydrated. After antigen retrieval with sodium citrate,


these sections were washed 3 times with 0.01 M PBS for 5 min each, and then incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min to eliminate endogenous peroxidase. After three more washes with


PBS, the sections were incubated with 5% goat serum and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 min at 37 °C. Afterward, primary antibodies (anti-β-amyloid 1–16, 6E10, Mouse, 1:1500) diluted in 2% goat


serum were added and incubated for 18 h at 4 °C. Sections in the negative control group were treated with 2% goat serum. After being rinsed 3 times with PBS, they were incubated with an


immunostaining chromogenic agent (MaxVision-HRP, mouse/rabbit) for 15 min at 37 °C and then developed by adding DAB solution. Finally, sections were dehydrated in gradient ethanol and xylene


and sealed with neutral resins. The morphological changes in the brain tissues were observed under a light microscope. In five randomly selected fields, the Aβ plaque number and area and


optical density value was calculated by Image Plus Pro. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The sequencing data were analyzed using R software and Cell Ranger. All data are presented as the primary data or


mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test was applied for comparisons among multiple groups.


The correlation among the number of T, B or NK cells; the expression levels of genes; and CDR scores (the severity of AD) was analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient.


The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated based on the average expression of all cells in the corresponding group using R software (R: cor(data, method = “pearson”)) to visualize


the intergroup variability across samples. A high correlation value represents high consistency in cell type distribution among samples, indicating low technical or biological variability


across samples in the dataset27. The correlation between the patients’ age and the changes in the expression of differentially expressed genes in B cells was assessed using binary regression


analysis. The genetic interaction was analyzed with String (https://www.string-db.org/), and interaction networks were generated by Cytoscape (Version 7.1). GraphPad Prism software version


7.0 (GraphPad Software Inc.) was used for quantification histogram generation. Any difference with a _p_ value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS ANALYSIS OF THE HETEROGENEITY OF


PBMC POPULATIONS BY SINGLE-CELL RNA-SEQ MRI scans showed cerebral atrophy and ventricular dilatation in late AD patients compared to normal individuals (Fig. 1a). PBMCs from AD patients were


collected for single-cell RNA-seq based on 10x Genomics droplets. The numbers of captured cells in the 6 samples were 8241 for N1, 7335 for N2, 7120 for EA1, 3690 for EA2, 10180 for LA1 and


10982 for LA2, which decreased to 7906, 6842, 6957, 3648, 9959 and 10932, respectively, after quality control (Fig. 1b). Data from multiple sequencing runs were merged using the Cell Ranger


pipeline. All cells were sorted according to the number of genes detected; a median of approximately 1000 genes were identified in these 6 samples, and more genes were identified in LA2 (a


sample from a late AD patient) than in other samples (Fig. 1c). The data did not indicate that all cells in each sample had a total of 1,000 genes detected, and a median gene count of


<1000 has been reported in previously published papers28,29,30. The intergroup variability in the datasets was visualized using the average expression of highly variable genes through


Pearson correlation coefficients, which provided an overview of all variation between samples, with pairwise correlation values ranging from 0.8101 to 0.9496 (Fig. 1d). The correlation


outcomes are shown in Supplementary Table 3, and the list of highly variable genes is available in Supplementary Table 4. Our datasets reveal high consistency in cell type distribution among


samples. VERIFICATION OF THE DIFFERENCES IN SUBSETS OF PBMCS IN AD PATIENTS KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes in 6 cell subsets revealed that the upregulated genes identified


by single-cell RNA-seq were mainly enriched in the pathways Measles, Influenza A, Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis), Bladder cancer, Malaria, Leishmaniasis, Fc gamma R-mediated


phagocytosis, Hematopoietic cell lineage, Osteoblast differentiation and T cell receptor signaling pathway, while the downregulated ones showed enrichment in Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis,


Chronic myeloid leukemia, Acute myeloid leukemia, Renal cell carcinoma, RNA transport, FoxO signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, Apoptosis, Sphingolipid signaling pathway and mRNA


surveillance pathway (Fig. 2a, b). Through the gene-based cluster analysis, the top 6 cell subsets in these 6 samples were screened and overlaid in 2 dimensions (Fig. 2c), and their


proportion in each sample was displayed (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Table 2). Collectively, the quantification data showed high densities of T cells and NK cells in each sample (Fig. 2d,


Supplementary Table 2). In the PBMCs of early and late AD patients, the percentage of B cells was visibly decreased compared with that of normal controls (Fig. 2e, f, Supplementary Table 2).


GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES OF CELL SUBPOPULATIONS OF PBMCS IN AD PATIENTS We performed clustering analysis to examine cellular heterogeneity in each subset of PBMCs. To identify


cluster-specific genes, the difference in the expression of each gene at different stages of AD was calculated. The heatmap demonstrated the difference in the expression of the significantly


upregulated and downregulated genes in single-cell gene expression data of the 6 cluster-specific cells (B cells, CD4, CD8, HSCs, monocytes and NK cells) of AD patients and normal


individuals (Fig. 3a). As shown, differentially expressed genes in each cell subset was divided into upregulated and downregulated genes according to the trends in their expression as the


disease proceeded (Fig. 3a, b). KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes in each cell subtype was carried out, revealing the top five pathways in which the upregulated genes of each


cell type was enriched. The pathways were as follows. _B cells:_ Alzheimer’s disease, Oxidative phosphorylation, Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease


(NAFLD); CD4+ _T cell:_ Oxidative phosphorylation, Metabolic pathways, Ribosome, Parkinson’s disease, Osteoclast differentiation; CD8+ _T cell:_ Oxidative phosphorylation, Alzheimer’s


disease, Huntington’s disease, Metabolic pathways, Parkinson’s disease; _HSCs_: Pathogenic _Escherichia coli_ infection, Proteasome, Epstein-Barr virus infection, Phagosome, Influenza A;


_Monocytes:_ Oxidative phosphorylation, Proteasome, Metabolic pathways, Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease; _NK cell:_ Spliceosome, Oxidative phosphorylation, Proteasome, Huntington’s


disease, Alzheimer’s disease (Fig. 3c). The pathways in which downregulated genes were enriched were almost entirely consistent with the results shown in Fig. 2a. In summary, upregulated


genes in B cells, CD8+ T cells and NK cells all exhibited enrichment in Alzheimer’s disease, which took first place in B cells, second in CD8+ T cells and fifth in NK cells among the top


five enriched signaling pathways. DIFFERENTIAL GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES IN B CELLS A Venn diagram made with TBtools (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009) revealed the numbers of


specific upregulated and downregulated genes in the 6 different cell types. Excluding the overlapping areas, there were 361 specific upregulated genes and 438 specific downregulated genes


found in B cells, 108 upregulated and 724 downregulated genes in CD4 + T cells, and 176 upregulated and 278 downregulated genes in CD8 + T cells (Fig. 4a, b). A circular heat map made with


TBtools (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009) displayed how the genes that were specifically expressed in B cells were expressed in the other 5 cell types, and the results revealed


that the genes that were specifically upregulated or downregulated in B cells did not exhibit obvious changes in other cell subsets (Fig. 4c, d). In addition, according to inclusion criteria


for AD, PBMCs from 43 AD patients and 41 normal subjects were collected for FACS, we found that AD patients had fewer T cells (23.9%) and B cells (3.37%) than normal controls (36.9% and


8.54%, respectively; Fig. 4e, f, g; _p_ = 0.000 and _p_ = 0.001, respectively). The relative number of NK cells was not significantly different. Furthermore, the correlation analysis between


the number of B cells and CDR score showed that the number of B cells was negatively related to the severity of AD; that is, the fewer B cells there were, the more serious the development


of AD was (Fig. 4h, i, j, _p_ = 0.0004). Based on these findings, B cells were determined to be a specific biomarker for AD. B CELL DEPLETION CAUSES COGNITIVE DECLINE IN AD MICE To further


verify the function of B cells in the progression of AD, 16-week-old AD mice were subjected to B cell depletion. After three months of consecutive BCDT, cognitive function was evaluated by


the open field test, Morris water maze test and Y-maze test. As shown, the AD mice treated with PBS and BCDT performed worse, as indicated by decreased rearing duration and number of rearing


events, than the dementia-free WT mice (Fig. 5a, _p_ < 0.05), and the mice in the AD + BCDT group suffered more severe dysfunction than those in the AD + PBS group (_p_ < 0.05). The


mice in the AD + BCDT and AD + PBS groups also performed worse in the Morris water maze and Y-maze tests than WT controls. A prolonged escape latency time, an increased distance traveled to


the platform, and a reduced number of platform area crossings demonstrated that AD mice had significant spatial and learning disabilities compared to controls, and the disabilities in the AD


 + BCDT group were much more severe than those in the AD + PBS group (Fig. 5b, c, d, e, f, _p_ < 0.05). The decreased working memory abilities of AD mice were indicated by shorter


duration in the novel arm, fewer entries into the novel arm, and lower spontaneous alteration than control mice in the Y-maze test (Fig. 5g, _p_ < 0.05). B CELL DEPLETION INCREASED AΒ


DEPOSITS IN THE BRAINS OF AD MICE The immunohistochemistry results showed that the amyloid plaque burden in the hippocampus and cortex were increased in PBS and BCDT AD mice compared to WT


mice (Fig. 6a, _p_ < 0.05). The optical density value of plaques, the number of plaques and the total plaque area in the cortex and hippocampus were all significantly elevated in the AD


mice relative to the WT mice (_p_ < 0.05), and those of AD mice with BCDT were increased more than those of AD mice treated with PBS (Fig. 6b, _p_ < 0.05). The distribution of Aβ


plaques in the four regions of the hippocampus was further specified. The plaques were mainly distributed in the CA1 region and DG of the hippocampus in the AD mice (Fig. 6c), as indicated


by the increased OD value of plaques in those regions among AD mice compared to WT mice (_p_ < 0.05). The BCDT AD mice exhibited higher plaque OD values in the CA1 and DG than PBS-treated


AD mice (Fig. 6d, _p_ < 0.05). Meanwhile, the number of plaques and the ratio of plaque area to total hippocampus area were elevated in all four regions of hippocampus in the AD mice


compared to WT mice, and those in BCDT AD mice were even higher than those in PBS-treated controls (Fig. 6d, _p_ < 0.05). IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIAL GENE EXPRESSION IN B


CELLS The top 100 upregulated genes (ranked by fold change) expressed in B cells during the progression of AD were identified, and the overlapping area showed 18 prominent genes as the


disease proceeded: AC109826.1, LINC00239, CTC-505O3.3, DTHD1, CFH, NFE2, QPCT, DAB2, PHLDA1, PPP2R2B, SIRPG, KIR2DL3, FOLR3, KIR3DL2, AOAH, IFNG, CD160, and FCRL6. These factors were then


imported into String, and their correlation and interaction were revealed and displayed by Cytoscape (Fig. 7a). Likewise, the overlapping downregulated genes were also determined and


imported into String to elucidate their interactive relationships; these genes were TTC39C-AS1, FRAT2, WWC3, C15orf48, RFX3, RP11-298J20.3, and SPG20. In B cells, the upregulated genes


KIR3DL2, QPCT, and PPP2R2B are all involved in neural function and neurodegenerative diseases, and the downregulated genes FRAT2 and WWC3 are involved in the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway,


which is associated with AD pathogenesis31,32 (Fig. 7b). Downregulated SPG20 could mediate mitochondrial calcium homeostasis. Dysfunction in regulating mitochondrial calcium homeostasis can


bring about intracellular accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in oxidative stress, which is one of the early features of AD. Thus, these 6 genes were selected for


further focus. We further analyzed the aforementioned differentially expressed genes in B cells from single-cell RNA-seq data; we found that KIR3DL2, QPCT and PPP2R2B were increasingly


expressed above the normal baseline in B cells as the disease progressed, while the expression of SPG20, FRAT2 and WWC3 decreased from the normal baseline as the disease developed (Fig. 7c,


d). EXPRESSION OF SPECIFIC GENES IN EACH CELL SUBSET WITH THE PROGRESSION OF AD To verify the specific expression trends of the abovementioned upregulated and downregulated genes in B cells,


we analyzed the expression trends of these 6 genes in B cells together with those in other cell clusters (CD4, CD8, HSC, monocytes, NK cells) from the single-cell RNA-seq data. As shown,


the expression of KIR3DL2 and PPP2R2B was significantly upregulated in B cells in early and late stages of AD (Fig. 7e, _p_ < 0.05), while the same was not true in other cell clusters.


WWC3 and SPG20 exhibited marked downregulation in B cells as AD proceeded (Fig. 7e, _p_ < 0.05). Additionally, in monocytes, the levels of PPP2R2B were significantly elevated while those


of SPG20 showed an obvious decrease during the progression of AD (Fig. 7f, _p_ < 0.05). Depending on whether the changes in the expression of these 6 factors deviated from the values in


normal patients, the expression data were divided into those with normal tendencies and those with abnormal tendencies, and the patients’ age was included for binary regression analysis. The


results showed that age was not a risk factor for genetic change (_p_ = 0.994). DISCUSSION In this study, differentially expressed cell subpopulations were screened in PBMCs of AD patients


by single-cell sequencing analysis; B cells represented a crucial cell subset in the progression of AD, as verified through in vivo functional experiments in AD mice. In addition,


differentially expressed genes in B cells were identified; both the upregulated genes (KIR3DL2, QPCT, PPP2R2B) and the downregulated genes (FRAT2, WWC3, SPG20) had certain connections with


neurodegenerative diseases. In the late stage of AD, KIR3DL2, QPCT and PPP2R2B in B cells were expressed at considerably higher levels than in early AD, while FRAT2, WWC3 and SPG20 showed


the opposite expression pattern. The study of biomarkers for the diagnosis of AD has been a challenging undertaking. Morphophysiological characterization with slice physiology has been


regarded as the standard in AD prognosis for decades33, but this method has many problems, such as insufficient sampling, difficulty in quantitative classification of cell types and limited


extensibility in terms of neuron diversity33,34. Single-cell RNA-seq allows unbiased, high-throughput quantitative investigations of molecularly defined cell types in any species, including


human beings35,36. However, its scalability has been limited by throughput (a maximum of 96 cells per microfluidic chip), high cost, and sampling bias arising from poor capture of smaller


nonneuronal nuclei on microfluidic chips37. Transcriptome analysis can identify different functional cell types making up complex tissues, and the inclusion of epigenetic information can


provide a more complete picture of how these expression profiles are regulated or maintained. Such recognition of cell-type-specific regulation will help improve the understanding of the


genetic programs that define the processes of cell commitment and differentiation38. In addition, since the common genetic variants associated with different traits and diseases are mainly


located in intronic or intergenic regions and enriched in tissue-specific regulatory sites39, the generation of cell-specific regulome maps may provide additional valuable insights into the


important mechanisms underlying diseases40. Single-cell RNA-seq has been used to classify cells in the spleen, lung epithelium, and embryonic brain41. Thus, higher-throughput single-cell


RNA-seq approaches specifically applicable to humans are necessary. Increasing evidence demonstrates the therapeutic relevance of PBMCs to AD13. Immune cells, particularly lymphocytes, may


be involved in the pathogenesis of AD42. Hence, elucidation of specific cellular and gene expression changes may be helpful in the early diagnosis of AD. To understand cellular heterogeneity


and identify key genes, appropriate experimental and computational methods are needed to make full use of the application of single-cell RNA-seq. In this study, single-cell RNA-seq was


employed to analyze differential cells and genes in PBMCs of AD patients. The single-cell RNA-seq results in this work provide a detailed view of PBMCs in normal and AD patients, in which


the top 6 cell subsets were B cells, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, HSCs, monocytes and NK cells, and the cell difference in each cluster can be clearly seen. Furthermore, while studying


signaling pathways, KEGG analysis revealed that the upregulated genes in the PBMCs were mainly enriched in the pathways Measles, Influenza A, Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis),


Bladder cancer, Malaria, Leishmaniasis, Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis, Hematopoietic cell lineage, Osteoblast differentiation and T cell receptor signaling pathway, while the


downregulated genes in the PBMCs showed enrichment in the pathways Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, Chronic myeloid leukemia, Acute myeloid leukemia, Renal cell carcinoma, RNA transport, FoxO


signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, Apoptosis, Sphingolipid signaling pathway and mRNA surveillance pathway, all of which were independent of Alzheimer’s disease. However, when the


gene expression of each cell subpopulation was targeted, Alzheimer’s disease enrichment ranked first among the signaling pathways enriched for upregulated genes in B cells. In addition,


upregulated genes in CD8 + T cells and NK cells were also enriched in Alzheimer’s disease, ranking second and fifth, respectively. Immediately, the investigation value of B cells in AD


stands out of other cell subsets. Afterward, the results were continuously expanded in 43 AD patients and 41 normal subjects through FACS, B cells were found to be specifically reduced in


PBMCs of AD patients after the initial analysis, and the decreased number of B cells was closely correlated with AD severity. Similar findings were shown in a previous study, in which the


absolute number and percentage of B cells in the lymphocyte subsets of AD were depressed relative to normal controls, whereas the other subsets displayed no significant difference43,44,45,


which further confirmed the reliability of our single-cell RNA-seq results. To verify the role of B cells in AD progression, we investigated their function by depleting B cells from


16-week-old APP/PS1 mice. After 3 months (once every 5 days) of intraperitoneal injection of anti-CD19/B220 antibodies, neurobehavioral tests were performed at the 28th week, and


immunohistochemical staining was performed at the 30th week, which revealed that AD mice with B cell inactivation suffered much more severe cognitive deficits than AD controls.


Correspondingly, the brains of B cells removed exhibited a significantly increased number and area of Aβ plaques in the cortex and hippocampus. Specifically, Aβ plaques were mainly


distributed in the CA1 region and DG of the hippocampus of AD mice. Functionally, the rostral and caudal hippocampus is known to be involved in different forms of learning and memory46.


Consistent with our observation, one MRI study of 120 participants with AD demonstrated that hippocampal subregions underwent differential atrophy47. In our data, inactivation of B cells in


the early stage significantly aggravated the AD-induced cognitive barriers with an elevated number and area of Aβ plaques in AD mice. Recently, B cell–related processes in AD have been the


topic of many investigations, some of which consistently revealed that B cells produce immunoglobulins that are potentially beneficial for reducing Aβ plaques48 and that they express


AD-ameliorating cytokines49. Nevertheless, a “dark” side of B cells was reported, as they exacerbated manifestations of AD-like symptoms. B cells in AD mice appeared to lose their


anti-inflammatory activity and took on an inflamed phenotype, indicated by upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines50 expression and B cell colocalization with Aβ plaques and activated


microglia. B cells together with T cells constitute the adaptive immune system, and B cells have capabilities of fulfilling various cellular and humoral functions that are dependent on their


stage of differentiation and activation status51. There is no lack of conflicting outcomes reporting the pathogenic or protective roles of B cells in AD mice. In a recent study by Kim et


al., the loss of B cells benefited AD patients by reducing Aβ plaque burden and disease-associated microglia, reversing behavioral and memory deficits and restoring TGFβ + microglia50. To


clarify the causes of the disagreement between our results and theirs, we carried out a detailed comparison of the murine experiments between the two articles and summarized the differences.


It is noted in a published study that B cell deficiency transgenic mice were constructed in 3×TgAD and APP/PS1 mice by crossing 3×TgAD or APP/PS1 mice with JHT mice, and transient B cell


inactivation or depletion was generated in 60- to 70-week-old 3×TgAD and 35- to 47-week-old 5×FAD mice by intraperitoneal injection of anti-B cell antibodies, anti-CD20 (100 μg/mouse) and


anti-B220 (250 μg/mouse). There was no overlap with regard to the arrangement of B cell depletion modeling, as in our study, 16-week-old APP/PS1 mice received intraperitoneal injection of


200 μL anti-CD19 (300 μg/mouse) and anti-B220 (300 μg/mouse) for B cell clearance. APP/PS1 mice are known as a classic model of early onset of AD and exhibit earlier AD pathology than 3×TgAD


mice. B cell depletion in APP/PS1 mice was initiated in our study when fibrous plaques were observed in mice at 16 weeks of age (data not shown), which was younger than the age at which B


cell APP/PS1 knockout mice were used (20–35 weeks). In addition, in their operation on another two models, B cells were cleared from 3×TgAD (60–70 weeks) and 5×FAD (35–47 weeks) mice. In


view of the frequency and duration of injection, we completed 21 injections within 3.5 months, including two weeks for behavioral tests to eliminate B cells, compared to 3–6 injections


within 2 months in their research, and our design maintained consecutively adequate depletion of B cells in the early onset of AD. Importantly, several factors are needed to determine the


pathogenic or protective roles of B cells, including the source of B cells (brain, cerebrospinal fluid or blood), antigen specificity of B cell clonotypes, B cell phenotyping51 and so on.


Hence, the aforementioned discrepancies may lie in the different B cell depletion antibodies, injection frequency of antibodies, injection duration, strain and age of animals. In summary,


despite their counterintuitive finding that B cell depletion had a protective effect in AD, our study proposes that massive B cell depletion in the early onset would exacerbate AD


progression, which is in concordance with the double-edged role of B cells in neurodegenerative disorders51. In this study, we base our outcomes on single-cell RNA-seq data of human PBMCs


and functional experiments on transgenic AD mice. The existing insufficient evidence for the protective effects of B cells in the early onset of AD warrants further in-depth clinical


investigations to facilitate the development of novel therapies for AD treatment. It is possible that the alteration of the peripheral B cell compartment in certain neurodegenerative


diseases, such as AD, is attributed to genetic factors. Consistent with the present study, single-cell RNA-seq data further uncovered that among 18 specifically upregulated genes, the


expression of KIR3DL2, PPP2R2B and QPCT in B cells was correlated with neural function and neurodegenerative diseases52,53,54. Of 7 specifically downregulated genes, FRAT2 and WWC3 were


involved in the Wnt/β-Catenin signaling pathway, which was associated with AD pathogenesis55,56. SPG20 is capable of regulating mitochondrial calcium homeostasis57, indirectly associated


with AD, because intracellular accumulation of ROS would occur as a result of dysfunction in regulating mitochondrial calcium homeostasis, leading to oxidative stress, which is one of the


early features of AD58. Additional evidence in this study verified the specificity of these upregulated and downregulated genes in B cells instead of in other cell subsets via t-SNE map


analysis. These results implied that the upregulation of KIR3DL2, PPP2R2B and QPCT and the downregulation of FRAT2, WWC3 and SPG20 in peripheral B cells can serve as a gene panel of


biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of AD. Collectively, both differential cell subpopulations in PBMCs and specifically expressed genes in B cells of AD patients were identified in


this work using single-cell RNA-seq analysis. A reduction in B cells in the PBMCs of AD patients and differentially expressed genes in B cells were identified in the present study,


indicating that certain important genes that could be molecular biomarkers in AD development may be expressed in certain cell types. The importance of promising single-cell RNA-seq analysis


in AD biomarker investigations has been strengthened. This study in its present form merely identified possible biomarkers of AD progression. Limitations exist because the obtained specific


genes lack longitudinal investigations to further determine their specific roles in the development of AD, which will be worked out in later clinical and basic research. DATA AVAILABILITY


The RNA-seq data reported in this article have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are accessible through GEO Series


accession number GSE168522. The detailed analysis method used in this study is provided in the Methods section and listed in Supplementary Table 5. REFERENCES * Hogh, P. Alzheimer’s disease.


_Ugeskr. Laege._ 179, V09160686 (2017). Google Scholar  * Atkinson, S. P. Alzheimer’s disease: a special collection. _Stem Cells Transl. Med._ 6, 1951–1955 (2017). Article  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Briggs, R., Kennelly, S. P. & O’Neill, D. Drug treatments in Alzheimer’s disease. _Clin. Med (Lond.)._ 16, 247–253 (2016). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central 


Google Scholar  * Chioua, M. et al. Synthesis, biological assessment and molecular modeling of racemic QuinoPyranoTacrines for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy. _Chem. Sel._ 3, 461–466 (2018).


CAS  Google Scholar  * Van, G.-B. M. et al. Correction: metabolic changes and inflammation in cultured astrocytes from the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: alleviation by


pantethine. _PLos One_ 13, e0194586 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Szablewski, L. Human gut microbiota in health and Alzheimer’s disease. _J. Alzheimers Dis._ 62, 549–560 (2018). Article


  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Panza, G. A. et al. Can exercise improve cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease? _J. Am. Geriatr. Soc._ 66, 487–495 (2018). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Cai, Z. Y. et al. Exosomes: a novel therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease? _Neural Regen. Res._ 13, 930–935 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Iaccarino, L.


et al. Local and distant relationships between amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s Disease. _Neuroimage Clin._ 17, 452–464 (2018). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Brookmeyer, R. & Abdalla, N. Estimation of lifetime risks of Alzheimer’s disease dementia using biomarkers for preclinical disease. _Alzheimers Dement._ 14, 981–988 (2018). Article 


PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Jin, W. S. et al. Peritoneal dialysis reduces amyloid-beta plasma levels in humans and attenuates Alzheimer-associated phenotypes in an APP/PS1


mouse model. _Acta Neuropathol._ 134, 207–220 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Jiao, S. S. et al. Differential levels of p75NTR ectodomain in CSF and blood in patients with


Alzheimer’s disease: a novel diagnostic marker. _Transl. Psychiatry_ 5, e650 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * London, J. A., Biegel, D. & Pachter, J. S.


Neurocytopathic effects of β -amyloid-stimulated monocytes: a potential mechanism for central nervous system damage in Alzheimer Disease. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa._ 93, 4147–4152 (1996).


Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hromadnikova, I. et al. Influence of in vitro IL-2 or IL-15 alone or in combination with Hsp 70 derived 14-Mer peptide (TKD) on the


expression of NK cell activatory and inhibitory receptors on peripheral blood T cells, B cells and NKT cells. _PLoS One_ 11, e0151535 (2016). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar


  * Julian, A. et al. There is no correlation between peripheral inflammation and cognitive status at diagnosis in Alzheimer’s disease. _Aging Clin. Exp. Res._ 27, 589–594 (2015). Article 


PubMed  Google Scholar  * Steegenga, W. T. et al. Genome-wide age-related changes in DNA methylation and gene expression in human PBMCs. _Age (Dordr.)_ 36, 9648 (2014). Article  Google


Scholar  * Risso, D. et al. Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 32, 896–902 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 


Google Scholar  * Smith, J. P. et al. Parametric control of collision rates and capture rates in geometrically enhanced differential immunocapture (GEDI) microfluidic devices for rare cell


capture. _Biomed. Microdevices_ 16, 143–151 (2014). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ong, S. G. et al. Microfluidic single-cell analysis of transplanted human induced


pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes after acute myocardial infarction. _Circulation_ 132, 762–771 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Risso, D. et al.


Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 32, 896–902 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hoffmann, K.


et al. Preserving cognition, quality of life, physical health and functional ability in Alzheimer’s disease: the effect of physical exercise (ADEX trial): rationale and design.


_Neuroepidemiology_ 41, 198–207 (2013). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Savas, P. et al. Single-cell profiling of breast cancer T cells reveals a tissue-resident memory subset associated


with improved prognosis. _Nat. Med._ 24, 986–993 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Butler, A. et al. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions,


technologies, and species. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 36, 411–420 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression


profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. _Cell_ 161, 1202–1214 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Martens, J. H. & Stunnenberg, H. G.


BLUEPRINT: mapping human blood cell epigenomes. _Haematologica_ 98, 1487–1489 (2013). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated


encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. _Nature_ 489, 57–74 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Koch, C. M. et al. A beginner’s guide to analysis of RNA sequencing data. _Am. J.


Respir. Cell Mol. Biol._ 59, 145–157 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Bossel, B. N. et al. Predicting bacterial infection outcomes using single cell


RNA-sequencing analysis of human immune cells. _Nat. Commun._ 10, 3266 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * Nehar-Belaid, D. et al. Mapping systemic lupus erythematosus heterogeneity at the


single-cell level. _Nat. Immunol._ 21, 1094–1106 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Guo, C. et al. Single-cell analysis of two severe COVID-19 patients reveals a


monocyte-associated and tocilizumab-responding cytokine storm. _Nat. Commun._ 11, 3924 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Vallée, A. et al. Effects of


cannabidiol interactions with Wnt/β-catenin pathway and PPARγ on oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. _Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. (Shanghai)_ 49, 853–866 (2017).


Article  Google Scholar  * De Ferrari, G. V. et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Alzheimer’s disease. _Cns. Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets_ 13, 745–754 (2014). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *


Huang, X. Y. et al. Analysis of the potential and mechanism of Ginkgo biloma in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease based on the network. _Ibrain_ 7, 21–28 (2021). Article  Google Scholar


  * Ascoli, G. A. et al. Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. _Nat. Rev. Neurosci._ 9, 557–568 (2008). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Sui, S. H. et al. Supporting single cell RNA-seq analysis at harvard—a community approach. _J. Biomol. Tech._ 30, S39 (2019). PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Papalexi, E. &


Satija, R. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. _Nat. Rev. Immunol._ 18, 35–45 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hedlund, E. & Deng, Q.


Single-cell RNA sequencing: technical advancements and biological applications. _Mol. Asp. Med._ 59, 36–46 (2018). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ziegenhain, C. et al. Comparative analysis


of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. _Mol. Cell_ 65, 631–643 (2017). e4. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Serin Harmanci, A., Harmanci, A. O. & Zhou, X. CaSpER identifies and


visualizes CNV events by integrative analysis of single-cell or bulk RNA-sequencing data. _Nat. Commun._ 11, 89 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhao, Y. et


al. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis reveals alginate oligosaccharides preventing chemotherapy-induced mucositis. _Mucosal. Immunol._ 13, 437–448 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Ashton, J. M. Single-cell genomics: best practices and new insights. _J. Biomol. Tech._ 30, S61–S62 (2019). PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Esteras, N. et al.


Lymphocytes in Alzheimer’s disease pathology: altered signaling pathways. _Curr. Alzheimer Res._ 13, 439–449 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Busse, M. et al. Alterations in


the peripheral immune system in dementia. _J. Alzheimers Dis._ 58, 1303–1313 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yang, S. H. et al. Abnormalities of plasma cytokines and spleen


in senile APP/PS1/Tau transgenic mouse model. _Sci. Rep._ 5, 15703 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Pellicano, M. et al. Systemic immune responses in


Alzheimer’s disease: in vitro mononuclear cell activation and cytokine production. _J. Alzheimers Dis._ 21, 181–192 (2010). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Belfiore, R. et al.


Temporal and regional progression of Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in 3xTg-AD mice. _Aging Cell_ 18, e12873 (2019). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Greene, S. J. & Killiany, R.


J. Hippocampal subregions are differentially affected in the progression to Alzheimer’s disease. _Anat. Rec. (Hoboken)._ 295, 132–140 (2012). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Marsh, S. E.


et al. The adaptive immune system restrains Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis by modulating microglial function. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 113, E1316–E1325 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed 


PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Baulch, J. E. et al. Immune and inflammatory determinants underlying Alzheimer’s disease pathology. _J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol._ 15, 852–862 (2020). Article


  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kim, K. et al. Therapeutic B-cell depletion reverses progression of Alzheimer’s disease. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 2185 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed 


PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Sabatino, J. J. Jr. et al. B cells in autoimmune and neurodegenerative central nervous system diseases. _Nat. Rev. Neurosci._ 20, 728–745 (2019). Article 


CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sun, J. & Wang, Y. KIR3DL2 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: from a promising biomarker to a potential therapeutic target. _Br. J. Dermatol._ 182, 1325–1326


(2019). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Madera-Salcedo, I. K. et al. PPP2R2B hypermethylation causes acquired apoptosis deficiency in systemic autoimmune diseases. _JCI. Insight_ 5,


e126457 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * Zhang, Q. Q. et al. Common polymorphisms within QPCT gene are associated with the susceptibility of Schizophrenia in a Han Chinese population.


_Mol. Neurobiol._ 53, 6362–6366 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * van Amerongen, R. et al. Frat is dispensable for canonical Wnt signaling in mammals. _Genes Dev._ 19, 425–430


(2005). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wang, Y. et al. WWC3 inhibits glioma cell proliferation through suppressing the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. _DNA. Cell


Biol._ 37, 31–37 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wei, K. L. et al. Methylomics analysis identifies a putative STAT3 target, SPG20, as a noninvasive epigenetic biomarker for


early detection of gastric cancer. _PLoS One_ 14, e0218338 (2019). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Cheignon, C. et al. Oxidative stress and the amyloid beta peptide


in Alzheimer’s disease. _Redox Biol._ 14, 450–464 (2018). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful for the financial support of Professor


Zhao-Qiong Zhu from Zunyi Medical University. This study was supported by the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Liu-Liu Xiong (201903) and the Program of Science & Technology


Department of Sichuan Province (2020YFS0043). It was also supported by the Project of Guizhou Health Committee (No. gzwjkj2020-1-014) and a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation


of China (Grant Nos. 82160223). AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Liu-Lin Xiong, Lu-Lu Xue, Ruo-Lan Du, Jia Liu, Chang-Yin Yu, Ting-Hua Wang. AUTHORS AND


AFFILIATIONS * Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China Liu-Lin Xiong * Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical


Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650504, Yunnan, China Liu-Lin Xiong * State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West


China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China Lu-Lu Xue & Ting-Hua Wang * Laboratory Animal Department, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650031, Yunnan, China


Ruo-Lan Du, Rui-Ze Niu, Ya-Xin Tan, Jia Liu & Ting-Hua Wang * Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu,


610041, Sichuan, China Li Chen, Qiao Hu & Ting-Hua Wang * School of Anesthesiology , Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China Jie Chen * Department of Neurology, West


China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China Hui-Fang Shang * Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China


Chang-Yin Yu Authors * Liu-Lin Xiong View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Lu-Lu Xue View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ruo-Lan Du View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rui-Ze Niu View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Li Chen View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jie Chen View author publications You can also search


for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Qiao Hu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ya-Xin Tan View author publications You can also


search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hui-Fang Shang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jia Liu View author publications You


can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Chang-Yin Yu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ting-Hua Wang View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS C.Y.Y. and T.H.W. contributed to the conceptual framework and revised the manuscript. L.-L.X. and


L.-L.X. are responsible for the experimental design, operation, writing and revision. J.L., Y.X.T., R.Z.N., and L.C. collected experimental data and performed statistical analysis. H.F.S.


provided the blood samples of the patients. Q.H., J.C., and R.L.D. contributed to graph making and data verification. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Jia Liu, Chang-Yin Yu or


Ting-Hua Wang. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE All the operations on the involved participants


were approved by the Ethics Committee of Biomedical Research for West China Hospital (approval number, No. 20150263; Chinese clinical trial registry number, ChiCTR1900022805), and this study


was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. All experimental procedures on animals conformed to the Animal Care and Use Committee of Kunming Medical University (kmmu2019058). All


studies were conducted in accordance with the United States Public Health Service’s Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION All the authors have agreed


to publish this article. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits


use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the


Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated


otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds


the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and


permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Xiong, LL., Xue, LL., Du, RL. _et al._ Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals B cell–related molecular biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. _Exp


Mol Med_ 53, 1888–1901 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00714-8 Download citation * Received: 18 November 2020 * Revised: 08 August 2021 * Accepted: 30 August 2021 * Published: 08


December 2021 * Issue Date: December 2021 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00714-8 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get


shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative