ABSTRACT The muscarinic-cholinergic system is involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD), and contributes to attention and the top-down and bottom-up cognitive and affective

mechanisms of emotional processing, functionally altered in BD. Emotion processing can be assessed by the ability to inhibit a response when the content of the image is emotional. Impaired

regulatory capacity of cholinergic neurotransmission conferred by reduced M2-autoreceptor availability is hypothesized to play a role in elevated salience of negative emotional distractors

in euthymic BD relative to individuals with no history of mood instability. Thirty-three euthymic BD type-I (DSM-V-TR) and 50 psychiatrically-healthy controls underwent functional magnetic

cholinergic challenge physostigmine relative to placebo, prioritizing any interaction with the diagnostic group. Analyses revealed that (1) at baseline, impaired behavioral performance was

associated with lower activation in the anterior cingulate cortex in BD relative to controls during emotion processing; (2) physostigmine (vs. placebo) affected behavioral performance during

the inhibition of negative emotions, without altering mood, and increased activation in the posterior cingulate cortex in BD (vs. controls); (3) In BD, lower accuracy observed during

emotion inhibition of negative emotions was remediated by physostigmine and was associated with cingulate cortex overactivation. Our findings implicate abnormal regulation of cholinergic

neurotransmission in the cingulate cortices in BD, which may mediate exaggerated emotional salience processing, a core feature of BD. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS EFFECTS OF

EBSELEN ADDITION ON EMOTIONAL PROCESSING AND BRAIN NEUROCHEMISTRY IN DEPRESSED PATIENTS UNRESPONSIVE TO ANTIDEPRESSANT MEDICATION Article Open access 07 May 2024 PREFRONTAL, PARIETAL, AND

LIMBIC CONDITION-DEPENDENT DIFFERENCES IN BIPOLAR DISORDER: A LARGE-SCALE META-ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING STUDIES Article Open access 13 February 2023 EFFECTS OF SHORT-TERM

QUETIAPINE AND LITHIUM THERAPY FOR ACUTE MANIC OR MIXED EPISODES ON THE LIMBIC SYSTEM AND EMOTION REGULATION CIRCUITRY IN YOUTH WITH BIPOLAR DISORDER Article 13 October 2022 INTRODUCTION

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe and burdensome psychiatric condition involving recurrent depressive and manic episodes and overall instability in regulating emotions [1]. The severity and

burden of bipolar affective dysregulation affects the quality of life of approximately 1–3% of the world population [2]; however, the neurobiological basis leading to the illness remains

unclear. Current pharmacological intervention of BD includes mood stabilizers and antipsychotics; however, the time lag in efficacy for these drugs, or inefficiency [3], makes BD treatment

suboptimal resulting in a proportion of patients remaining refractory to treatment. Hence, there is a greater need for the discovery of new agents that are specific to biologically defined

streams within BD. Using pharmacological neuroimaging research, it is important to identify neural biomarkers with predictive validity for therapeutic response to enhance diagnostic

specificity and guide treatment decisions, to identify the different biological subtypes of BD that may exist and to address the biological heterogeneity extant within mood disorders.

Emotion processing involves the detection and evaluation of salient stimuli as well as the regulation of one’s emotional (affective) response to these stimuli [4]. Dysregulated emotional

responses can lead to pathological mood states. Among the array of emotion-related impairments in BD, a hallmark of this disorder is the distorted information processing or attentional

allocation toward emotional stimuli [5]. In particular, the salience of negative stimuli is proven challenging in life for those presenting with the disorder [6]. Impaired ability to inhibit

a response to emotional stimuli (i.e., the emotion-inhibition condition of the functional task in this study) is one aspect of emotion regulation that may be caused by distorted perception

and exaggerated responses to emotional stimuli [7]. Emotion processing can be assessed by the ability to inhibit a response when the content of the image is emotional - the

emotion-inhibition condition of the fMRI task assessed herein. Although these are clinically and functionally relevant key features of manic and depressive states in BD, and to a lesser

extent of euthymia [7], the neural mechanisms that underpin these impairments are poorly understood. Relating clinically meaningful endpoints to neurotransmitter system circuits is feasible

using pharmacological challenge during functional task-based MRI and has the potential to inform more precise symptom management. Much evidence converges in implicating a molecular signature

in human emotion processing, with specific neuromodulatory systems modulating task-specific cognitive states and emotions [8]. In terms of BD, human emotion processing is relevant in the

following context. The hypothesis that the brain’s cholinergic neurotransmitter system could act as a modulator of depression and mania was originally proposed in the 1970s by Janowsky and

colleagues in their cholinergic-adrenergic hypothesis of mania and depression [9], recently revisited [10], whereby increased and decreased central cholinergic states in the brain could

contribute to low and elevated mood states, respectively. Behaviorally the cholinergic system plays major roles in attention, and the top-down and bottom-up mechanisms of emotion processing

[11,12,13]; cognitive mechanisms known to be functionally impaired among individuals with in BD [4]. Numerous lines of evidence have since shed further light on the role of the cholinergic

system in mood-regulation and specifically for the muscarinic-cholinergic system in BD, drawing upon post-mortem, genetic, pre-clinical and clinical studies [14]. Studies using adequate

doses of cholinomimetic agents such as physostigmine have been shown to exacerbate depressive signs and symptoms in actively depressed subjects [15], and in euthymic individuals with BD

[15,16,17]; as well as psychiatrically-healthy individuals [15,16,17,18]. These effects are mediated centrally as administration of simplified analogues of physostigmine not crossing the

blood-brain barrier, such as neostigmine, do not result in these depressive effects [19]. Crucially, these effects are mediated by muscarinic receptors [20, 21] as they are reversed by

antimuscarinic agents such as biperiden [22]. Furthermore, cholinomimetic drugs, including physostigmine have been demonstrated to play a role in the reversal of mania in BD

[23,24,25,26,27]. It is noteworthy that various monoamine transmitters may interplay with the muscarinic-cholinergic system in mechanisms of depression and mania, implying a

muscarinic-cholinergic modulatory effect on mood [28]. Further evidence for cholinergic system involvement in BD comes from in vivo molecular positron emission tomography where Cannon and

colleagues [29] showed that the muscarinic-cholinergic type-2 receptor (M2), an inhibitory or autoreceptor, is less available in the limbic system and particularly in the cingulate cortices

in BD relative to major depressive disorder or controls [29]. In a follow-up study, Cannon and colleagues [30] suggested that changes in M2-receptor availability may be led by a variation in

the gene (CHRM2) coding for the M2-receptor (TT genotype of SNP rs324650). Cannon and colleagues [30] in their study of BD using [18 F]FP-TZTP radioligand, sensitive to intersynaptic

concentrations of ACh, suggest that the observations of reduced PET binding in BD subjects may be attributable to differences either in M2-receptor density or affinity, or intrasynaptic ACh

concentrations. In recent large-scale GWAS studies, several polymorphisms of the CHRM2 gene have been associated with features of cognitive decline in healthy controls [31], though not

rs324650 specifically. Although large-scale GWAS studies have not yet identified cholinergic genes as prominent risk factor for BD, evidence for cholinergic genes involvement in BD illness

have been derived from small scale studies [6]. BD is associated with structural and functional abnormalities that overlap with regions involved in ventromedial and ventrolateral routes to

emotional control [1, 32, 33]. Studies focusing on functional MRI (fMRI) activation in euthymic BD in relation to emotion processing reported increased activation in frontolimbic regions

(including amygdala, nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex [34, 35]) and decreased activation in the basal ganglia (caudate, putamen and globus pallidum [36, 37]) and in the inferior and

middle frontal cortices [36,37,38,39]. These areas overlap with the ventral-dorsal systems thought to underpin the processing of emotion and participate in circuits responsible for

attributing and perceiving the salience of emotional information [40, 41]. These areas are rich in cholinergic projections [42] and overlap anatomically with regions of previously implicated

low muscarinic-cholinergic receptor distribution volume in BD [29]. Taken together with the robust pharmacological evidence for mood effect of cholinomimetics agents reviewed earlier it is

clear that the muscarinic-cholinergic system is implicated in aspects of BD illness. In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study using the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor

physostigmine during an emotion-inhibition fMRI paradigm, we aimed to demonstrate muscarinic-cholinergic involvement in clinically relevant behavioural features of BD relative to a control

group. We examined behavioural performance (accuracy and reaction time) and related neural abnormalities during processes of emotion recognition and emotion inhibition. Our hypothesis is

that subjects with BD will display reduced capacity for inhibitory regulation of muscarinic-cholinergic neurotransmission upon stimulation of the system with physostigmine relative to

placebo and control groups. Further, that physostigmine would impact behavioural performance (accuracy and reaction time) in terms of inhibition of negative emotional stimuli, and that the

effects observed in BD will exceed the expected effects in healthy controls. We did not anticipate that physostigmine would significantly alter mood at the given dosage of 1 mg, considering

worsening of mood had been observed only at higher dosages in both euthymic and actively depressed BD subjects [15, 16]. The expected impact of this research is to inform on the contribution

of the muscarinic-cholinergic neurotransmitter system to BD; and highlight the relevance of developing therapeutics targeting this system to ameliorate core emotional clinically relevant

features of BD. MATERIALS AND METHODS EMOTION RECOGNITION AND INHIBITION TASK In BD, there is evidence that cognitive performance is impaired when there are emotional stimuli in the

environment. Participants were trained on the task prior to MRI scanning; participants were first asked to stare at a fixation cross, then asked to process visual stimuli with different

emotional valence, followed by a question referring either to the emotional valence of the picture (the emotion-recognition trial) or to the image orientation (the emotion-inhibition trial).

The emotion-recognition trial involved participants to focus on the emotional content of the picture, namely if the image had positive, negative or no (neutral) emotional valence. The image

orientation trial involved participants to focus on the physical orientation of the frame of the picture, namely if the image was in portrait (vertical) orientation or not. Participants

answered ‘yes’ or ‘no’ using their dominant hand on a two-button response box (Current Design Inc, USA). Participants did not know which of the trial types they would be asked, which forced

them to process both types of information (emotion and orientation), ultimately having to inhibit one type depending on the question asked. Accuracy (number of accurate hits) and reaction

times (ms) were collected (Presentation Software, Neurobehavioral Systems 18.0 v, Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc., Berkeley, CA, www.neurobs.com). To remove outliers, in each fMRI task

accuracy and reaction time were thresholded at the individual level. For reaction times (RT), a selective mean was calculated as the overall meanRT/standard deviationRT and only those values

falling within ± two standard deviations from the selective mean were extracted for each event type; in other words, subjects who were too fast or too slow at answering the question asked

were considered outliers and thus not analyzed. Based on this RT threshold, accuracy was extracted for each event type, i.e. the number of hits for those subjects considered outliers (based

on RT) were not analyzed. STUDY DESIGN & PHARMACOLOGICAL CHALLENGE This study was designed as a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial involving subjects undergoing fMRI

task-based imaging (acquisition and task detailed below) before and after a pharmacological challenge of the cholinergic system. After the first fMRI task session and 30 min prior to the

start of the second task session, participants underwent intravenous infusion of placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%) or physostigmine, at an initial dose of 2 mg/hr for 10 min followed by 0.8 

mg/hr to completion of the study resulting in a maximum possible dose of 1 mg physostigmine [43]. Glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg _i.v_. was administered before physostigmine infusion to minimize

peripheral side effects of physostigmine [44]. At this dose and rate of infusion physostigmine has been demonstrated to have minimal side effects while altering behavioural performance to a

detectable level [11]. STUDY PARTICIPANTS DIAGNOSIS & GENOTYPE Participants aged between 18 and 65 years were recruited from the western regions of Ireland’s Health Services via referral

(outpatients) or public advertisement (patients and controls). All participants were genotyped (detailed below) for the muscarinic-cholinergic type-2 receptor gene (CHRM2) single nucleotide

polymorphism (SNP) rs324650 and matched for genotype (AA, AT and TT) within diagnostic groups. Groups were matched for age within a range of +/− 5 years. A diagnosis of BD was confirmed

using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IVTR) [45] 40 and the Structured Clinical Interview by an experienced psychiatrist; euthymia was defined using the

Hamilton Depression (HDRS-21 < 8) and Young Mania (YMRS < 7) Rating Scales at both medical screening and MRI scanning. Additionally, anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Hamilton

Anxiety rating scale (HARS < 18). Exclusion criteria included neurological disorders, learning disability, comorbid misuse of substance/alcohol and of axis-1 disorders, history of head

injury resulting in loss of consciousness for >5 min or a history of oral steroid use in the previous 3 months, unstable respiratory conditions, or history of cardiovascular events.

Healthy controls had no personal history of a psychiatric illness or history of first-degree relatives (DSM-IV, Non-patient edition). A licensed pharmacist reviewed drug interactions with

the cholinomimetic agent used in the study prior to administration. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the University College Hospital Galway, St. James’s Hospital Dublin and

Mullingar CRECS, and participants gave written fully informed consent. MOOD AND WORD SALIENCE RATING SCALE The Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire, the Visual Analogue scale [46]

(VAS) and a word salience rating scale were administered before and after MRI scanning. Data on both were missing in one BD and one control participant. The POMS consisted of 65 emotionally

valent words rated on a scale of 1, ‘not at all’ to 5, ‘extremely’. POMS scores formed four independent factors (Supplementary Table 1; Supplementary Fig. 1) using a principal component

analysis, namely ‘depressed’ (_r_ range:0.88–0.52), ‘fatigued’ (_r_:0.82–0.52), ‘positive’ (_r_:0.75–0.50) and ‘irritable’ (_r_:0.87–0.54). The VAS scores were found to encompass in the POMS

scores entirely in terms of variance. Additionally, subjects subjectively rated the salience of previously validated [47] 79 emotionally valenced words on a scale of ‘very positive’ to

‘very negative’. Repeated measure Multivariate Analysis of Co-Variance (MANCOVA) with fixed factors diagnosis and challenge was carried out for group comparisons (_p_ < 0.05). All

statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistics Package for Social Sciences (SPSS v23, IBM, New York, USA). EMOTION RECOGNITION AND INHIBITION FMRI TASK An emotion-inhibition fMRI

task was chosen to assess regional functional activation involved in valence assessment of emotional content [48, 49], consisting of 180 pseudo-randomized trials belonging to two groups,

emotion-recognition and emotion-inhibition trials, and three emotional valences for a total of six event types (International Affective Picture System database, IAPS [50]). Two unique

batches of images matched for the degree of salience of each valence were used before and after physostigmine or placebo administration, resulting in sixty unrepeated pictures in each

valence category (mean time of fMRI task events = 1.5 s). For further details on the fMRI paradigm and behavioural data acquisition refer to Supplementary Material. We examined baseline

behavioural performance (accuracy and reaction time) in BD relative to controls on placebo (MANCOVA, fixed factor diagnosis, covarying for age and gender, _p_ < 0.05); and after

physostigmine administration. Comparisons included the interaction between drug treatment, physostigmine or placebo, and diagnostic groups; and the effect of drug treatment within each

diagnostic group (repeated measure MANCOVA, fixed factors diagnosis and challenge, covarying for age and gender; _p_ < 0.05). _Post-hoc_ investigations were carried out on the significant

group differences (one-way ANOVA; _p_FDR-corrected < 0.05;). IMAGE ACQUISITION & PROCESSING MRI scanning was performed at the Welcome Trust Health Research Board National Centre for

Advanced Medical Imaging (CAMI) at St. James’s Hospital Dublin, Ireland, using a 3 Tesla Achieva scanner (Philips, The Netherlands). High-resolution 3D T1-weighted turbo field echo

magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence using an eight-channel head coil (TR/TE = 8.5/3.046 ms, 1 mm3 isotropic voxel size, slice thickness = 1 mm, 160 slices) and a

spin-echo EPI sequence (TR/TE = 2000/35 ms, 3 mm3 voxel size, slice thickness = 4.8, 37/38 slices) were acquired. Images were inspected for artefacts and motion; specifically, functional

images were visually inspected and corrected for signal dropout and excessive head movement (translation and rotation; range <3 mm or +/−3°). Functional MRI data were analyzed using SPM12

(http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). Images underwent slice-timing to TR/2, realignment to the first volume for motion correction, co-registration of the structural image to the mean of the

motion corrected images using a 12-parameter affine transformation. Spatial normalization to 1 mm3 and smoothing (8 mm FWHM Gaussian kernel) were performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSES First level

_t_-test analyses using six contrasts, were defined for each fMRI scanning session including one contrast to assess the overall effect of the scanning session, two contrasts to investigate

main effects of trial type (emotion recognition and emotion inhibition), and three to account for the different emotional valences (neutral, negative and positive). Movement parameters were

used as regressors in the first level analysis; times at which questions were answered (onsets) were also accounted for. Second level T-contrasts included baseline comparison between

diagnostic groups (i.e., BD-placebo _vs_. HC-placebo); further comparisons included the interaction between drug treatment, physostigmine or placebo, and diagnostic groups (i.e.,

BD-physostigmine _vs_. HC-physostigmine; BD-placebo _vs_. HC-placebo); and the effect of drug treatment within each diagnostic group (i.e., BD-physostigmine _vs_. BD-placebo;

HC-physostigmine _vs_. HC-placebo). The investigation of emotion-inhibition trials presenting images of negative valence were prioritized in this study to test our a priori hypothesis that

subjects with BD would display reduced capacity for inhibitory regulation of muscarinic-cholinergic neurotransmission upon stimulation of the cholinergic system with physostigmine relative

to placebo and control groups. Age and gender were included as covariates in all the second level analyses. The threshold for significance was set as _p_FWE-corr < 0.05 in clusters

greater than 10-voxels in extent. The Brodmann Atlas [51] was used to localize the significant areas in Talairach space. Exploratory analyses were carried out _post-hoc_ to investigate the

contribution of SNP rs324650 on the main cluster findings. Thus, study participants underwent DNA genotyping from saliva samples and were grouped based on their allele frequency for SNP

rs324650 (refer to Supplementary Material). RESULTS PARTICIPANTS CLINICAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS The imaging analysis featured a total of 33 participants with BD type I (_n_ = 29)

and type II (_n_ = 4) and 50 controls aged 18–64; groups were matched for age and gender and education level (Table 1). Mood scores were available and examined for 46 participants with BD

type I (_n_ = 41) and type II (_n_ = 5) aged 20–64, and 55 age and gender-matched controls. A total of 18 participants (_N_ = 13 BD, _N_ = 5 controls) were not included in the imaging

analysis relative to the mood analysis. This was due to technical port errors in recording the fMRI behavioural data and a portion of study participants being removed from the scanner prior

to completion of the first and/or second fMRI task due to nausea, one of the known peripheral side effects of physostigmine. For those who did complete imaging, the majority of BD

participants were euthymic at the time of scanning (64%); _n_ = 12 subjects displayed mild-to-moderate signs and symptoms (Table 1), and we indicate below that removing these subjects failed

to alter the findings. Neither mood, as rated using the POMS-derived four factors depressed, fatigued, positive and irritable (F(4,90) = 0.332, _p_ = 0.856), nor word salience (F(3,75) = 

1.546, _p_ = 0.210) differed significantly at baseline in the BD group relative to controls. Following physostigmine, these mood factors and word salience were not significantly altered

relative to the placebo group and showed no interaction with diagnosis (POMS: F(4,90) = 0.850, _p_ = 0.497; word salience: F(3,75) = 1.828, _p_ = 0.149). Genotype-based recruitment within

this sample was challenging in particular for the minor allele (TT genotype; Supplementary Table 2) and is considered hereafter as a _post-hoc_ factor to inform future analyses. BRAIN

FUNCTIONAL ACTIVATION & EMOTION RECOGNITION AND INHIBITION The cholinergic challenge using physostigmine (1 mg) leads to increased functional activation in the posterior cingulate

cortices during the inhibition and recognition of negative emotions and affects behavioural performance in BD (without altering mood) relative to healthy controls. While patients’

behavioural performance following physostigmine was overall lower than that of controls, physostigmine normalized processing ability (improved accuracy and reaction time) in the BD group

during the inhibition of negative emotions, relative to placebo; this effect was associated with cingulate cortex overactivation in BD. We describe these results in detail below, starting

with a baseline assessment of behavioural and imaging data in patients relative to controls, followed by an interaction analysis between drug allocation (physostigmine or placebo) and

diagnostic group, and, lastly, physostigmine effects within each diagnostic group. The investigation of emotion-inhibition trials presenting images of negative valence were prioritized in

this study to test our a priori hypothesis. BASELINE BEHAVIOURAL AND IMAGING ANALYSIS At baseline, prior to physostigmine administration, we detected impaired emotion processing in BD

relative to the control group overall (F(36,210) = 1.662, _p_ = 0.015). In particular, having BD was associated with impaired accuracy (_p_ = 0.012) and longer time to response (_p_ = 0.029)

in recognition but not inhibition (_p_ = 0.164, _p_ = 0.544) of negative emotions. Recognition or inhibition in the context of positive emotion did not differ significantly between

diagnostic groups. Impaired recognition of negative emotion was associated with lower right caudate activation (_T_ = 6.21, _p_ < 0.001; Supplementary Fig. 2) and despite being as

accurate as controls on the task when inhibiting a negative emotion, this was associated with lower activation of the left subgenual cingulate cortex (BA24, _T_ = 5.39, _p_ < 0.001;

Supplementary Fig. 2). INTERACTION BETWEEN DRUG TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSTIC GROUP ON BEHAVIORAL AND IMAGING DATA Physostigmine impacts emotion processing and cingulate activation differently in

bipolar disorder relative to healthy controls: We investigated whether physostigmine/placebo administration would impact brain functional activation and/or behavioral performance in BD

relative to controls. Overall, in accuracy and response times on recognition and inhibition (Supplementary Table 3) we detected an effect of diagnosis (F(12,66) = 3.097, _p_ = 0.002), no

effect of physostigmine (F(12,66) = 1.178, _p_ = 0.317), and a significant diagnosis-by-physostigmine interaction (F(12,66) = 1.931, _p_ = 0.046; Supplementary Table 3). This interaction

showed that after physostigmine, BD behavioral performance (accuracy) remained significantly lower than controls during the inhibition, but not recognition (_p_ = 0.495), of negative

emotions (_p_ = 0.027; Fig. 2C). In contrast, prior to receiving the challenge, at baseline, accuracy did not differ between these groups during the inhibition (_p_ = 0.224) or recognition

(_p_ = 0.994) of negative emotions. Furthermore, in BD-physostigmine administration increased activation in the bilateral dorsal cingulate cortices (BA31) and supramarginal gyri (BA40)

during both recognition (_T_ = 4.21, _p_ < 0.001, Fig. 1C) and inhibition (_T_ = 4.11, _p_ < 0.001; Fig. 2C) of negative and positive (_T_ = 3.45, _p_ = 0.001, _T_ = 4.60, _p_ < 

0.001) emotion compared to controls. The main behavioral and imaging findings were confirmed when excluding 9 BD subjects who did not meet criteria for euthymia (refer to Supplementary

Material). _Post-hoc_ exploratory analyses including allele frequencies for SNP rs324650 in BD and controls confirmed a statistical effect of physostigmine in the posterior cingulate cortex

for the BD-TT group (_n_ = 4) on inhibition of negative emotions, with increased activation in the left posterior cingulate cortex (BA23) relative to controls-AA (_n_ = 11, _post-hoc_, _p_ 

< 0.001), and bilaterally relative to BD-AT (_n_ = 11, _post-hoc_, BA23; _p_ = 0.0348). WITHIN-SUBJECT COMPARISONS ON BEHAVIOURAL AND IMAGING DATA Physostigmine effects in healthy

controls: Among controls, physostigmine administration relative to placebo did not significantly alter the accuracy or response time in the recognition (Fig. 1B) or inhibition (Fig. 2B) of

negative emotions. Despite this, recognition (_T_ = 4.58, _p_ < 0.001; Fig. 1B) was associated with reduced activation in the left anterior cingulate cortex (BA32), left supramarginal

(BA40), right middle occipital gyri (BA19) and right cerebellum, and inhibition (_T_ = 4.20, _p_ < 0.001; Fig. 2B) with reduced activation of the right caudate and cerebellum; while

following physostigmine both recognition and inhibition of negative emotion was associated with reduced activation of the left superior frontal gyrus (BA8). Physostigmine effects in bipolar

disorder: In contrast, among the BD group, physostigmine relative to placebo improved the accuracy and response time on inhibition (_p_ = 0.071, _p_ = 0.007, Fig. 2A) but not recognition

(_p_ = 0.152, _p_ = 0.089, Fig. 1A) of negative emotion and this was associated with increased activation in the right anterior cingulate (BA32) and middle frontal gyrus (BA10) for

inhibition (_T_ = 4.62, _p_ < 0.001; Fig. 2A) and right subgenual cingulate gyrus (BA24) and superior frontal gyrus (BA46) for recognition (_T_ = 4.11, _p_ = 0.006; Fig. 1A). DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates the involvement of the regulation of the muscarinic-cholinergic neurotransmission in clinically relevant behavioural features of BD, emotion inhibition, relative to a

control group and to placebo. At baseline, BD emotion processing was impaired, and their anterior cingulate cortex was under activated, relative to controls. Administration of cholinergic

challenge physostigmine affected emotion processing differently in controls than patients, with overactivation observed within the anterior cingulate cortex in BD, and under-activation

within the anterior cingulate cortex in controls. Relative to controls, intravenous administration of physostigmine 1 mg at steady state normalized behavioural performance in BD without

significantly altering mood (defined by factors depressed, fatigued, irritable, or positive), and was associated with cingulate cortex overactivation in patients, which significantly

exceeded that seen in controls (Table 2). Cannon and collegues [6] previously reported an inverse relationship between the saliency of affective words and whole-brain M2 distribution volume

in BD, in line with the known role of the muscarinic-cholinergic system attributing salience to experiential stimuli [52]. We failed to record group differences in word salience upon

muscarinic-cholinergic challenge in BD, possibly due to the lack of effect of physostigmine on mood at the given dosage, which we expected in this sample considering worsening of mood had

been observed only at higher dosages in euthymic and actively depressed BD subjects [15, 16]. We reported differential behavioural response in BD relative to controls during the inhibitory

regulation or shifting of attention away from emotional stimuli. We also showed that reduced capacity for inhibition of cholinergic neurotransmission in BD was mediated by functional changes

within regions involved in ventromedial and ventrolateral routes to emotional and attentional control [1]. The _ventromedial route_ includes the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, which

in task-based fMRI studies of BD has been shown to relate to internal emotion processing such as autobiographical mood induction [1]; and specifically in this study, this may relate to

internal processes of emotion inhibition. The _ventrolateral route_ includes the anterior cingulate cortex, which relates to tasks examining external emotion control such as face processing

[1], or in this study, image recognition. Anatomically, our imaging findings involve a constellation of functionally specialized subsystems of the brain responsible for the identification of

emotionally salient stimuli, the generation of appropriate affective state, and the voluntary top-down regulation of emotional responses. Besides the prominent role of the cingulate gyri,

other brain areas were recruited. For example, in the BD group at baseline before physostigmine administration, besides the cingulate, the caudate was also under activated when processing

emotions relative to controls (Supplementary Fig. 2). The caudate nucleus is one of the areas where emotional states and behaviours originate [32]; when considered with its under-activation

during emotion recognition in BD, it suggests patients may not be able to successfully focus on the emotional aspects of a stimulus and that stronger top-down regulation of regions

originating emotional response may be needed for attention allocation to emotional stimuli, relative to controls. Following physostigmine in the BD group, in addition to the cingulate

cortices (Fig. 2), the superior and middle frontal gyri were over-activated (Fig. 1); these regions collectively participate in ventromedial routes to emotional control and may relate to the

deficient regulation of the emotional response elicited by the picture presented, and thus relate to biased valence processing seen in BD. In controls, following physostigmine, besides the

cingulate cortices (Fig. 2), parieto-occipital regions were under activated during emotion inhibition, presenting an extensive inhibitory neurocircuitry functional model associated with

emotion processing in healthy controls. In summary, in controls, physostigmine induced reductions in cingulate functional activity, while emotion processing remained broadly unchanged, may

reflect an intact autoreceptor system response to cholinergic challenge in this group. Contrastingly in BD, physostigmine induced increased activation within the cingulate cortex suggests a

molecular deficit in this group, in line with the proposed reductions in inhibitory capacity seen in BD [29]. Of note, Cannon and colleagues [29] reported that it was not only in the

cingulate cortex that the M2 receptors were reduced in BD; however, the ACC was the region displaying the statistically strongest differences [29]. While the cingulate cortex role within

networks involved in emotion processing deficits is well established in BD both anatomically and functionally [1, 53], the neurotransmitter systems involved in these impairments, and more

generally the contribution of these systems to mood dysregulation and cognitive control in psychiatry, are less investigated. A preliminary look into the role of the rs324650 SNP in

muscarinic-cholinergic function in BD following physostigmine administration showed greater activation in the posterior cingulate cortices during the inhibition of negative emotions in the

BD-TT genotype group, relative to BD-AT and controls-AA; in line with reduced capacity for inhibition of cholinergic neurotransmission seen overall in BD in this study. Cannon and colleagues

[30] previously showed that the TT polymorphism in BD was linked with a higher risk of attempting suicide, poorer social–occupational function and greater cognitive impairment. Future

studies including further clinical and behavioural variables should investigate whether these deficits may reflect poorer cognitive reserve for BD subjects who are homozygous for the T

allele. The effect of genetic variance in rs324650 on M2-receptor binding in the cingulate cortices in BD has been previously described [30], with BD-TT genotype showing the most significant

reductions in M2-receptor binding (lower M2-receptor distribution volume) relative to BD-AT and controls-TT. Considering this receptor plays a major role in the regulation of ACh release, a

genetic variation within CHRM2 that alters the function of this autoreceptor could, in turn, alter the capacity for regulation of cholinergic neurotransmission and thus exert widespread

effects on a variety of emotional and cognitive domains and their interaction, particularly in BD. It is to be noted that our BD sample was taking a range of medications at the time of

scanning. Their effect and interaction on physostigmine were beyond the scope of this study. Although we cannot exclude medication effects on our findings, a recent review of medication

effects in neuroimaging studies in BD suggests that medication impact is higher for structural (volumetric) MRI than it is for diffusion or functional MRI [54]. In closing, physostigmine

induced increase in cingulate cortex functional activation during emotion processing in BD may be considered a marker of cholinergic sensitivity and emotion dysregulation in this illness.

When considered together with the normalization of emotion processing ability seen in the BD group in this study, these physostigmine induced effects may represent a valid dose-sensitive

target for core symptom management in BD. Recently, the relative increase in acetylcholine concentrations and cholinergic signalling dysregulation in BD has been a potential target for

muscarinic antagonists such as scopolamine [55], which has been proven a fast-onset and sustained antidepressant in medication naïve and treatment-resistant BD [56]; however, its

dose-response profile and time-course antidepressant effects and impact on cognition will require further investigation. We also report preliminary evidence of cingulate involvement in a

subgroup of BD participants with the TT genotype of SNP rs324650. While preliminary evidence suggests we may be coming closer to being able to exploit the cholinergic hypothesis of mood [16,

55] to ameliorate core features of BD illness, further clinical trials using muscarinic-cholinergic antagonists are warranted and future research should strive to incorporate a genomics

approach to define muscarinic-cholinergic sensitivity to potentially detect those individuals more likely to benefit from these agents. REFERENCES * Strakowski SM, Adler CM, Almeida J,

Altshuler LL, Blumberg HP, Chang KD, et al. The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: A consensus model. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:313–25. Article  Google Scholar  * Krahn GL. WHO World

report on disability: a review. Disabil Health J. 2011;4:141–2. Article  Google Scholar  * Yildiz A, Vieta E, Leucht S, Baldessarini RJ. Efficacy of antimanic treatments: Meta-analysis of

randomized, controlled trials. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36:375–89. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Townsend J, Altshuler LL. Emotion processing and regulation in bipolar disorder: A

review. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:326–39. Article  Google Scholar  * Bell CC. DSM-IV: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. JAMA. 1994;272:828–9. Article  Google Scholar  *

Cannon DM, Nugent AC, Erickson K, Carson RE, Eckelman WC, Kiesewetter DO, et al. Muscarinic cholinergic2 receptor binding in bipolar disorder: Relation to saliency of affective-words. J

Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:S420–S420. Article  Google Scholar  * Hummer TA, Hulvershorn LA, Karne HS, Gunn AD, Wang Y, Anand A. Emotional response inhibition in bipolar disorder: A

functional magnetic resonance imaging study of trait- and state-related abnormalities. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:136–43. Article  Google Scholar  * Shine JM, Breakspear M, Bell PT, Ehgoetz

Martens KA, Shine R, Koyejo O, et al. Human cognition involves the dynamic integration of neural activity and neuromodulatory systems. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:289–96. Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Janowsky DS, Davis JM, El-Yousef MK, Sekerke HJ. A cholinergic-adrenergic hypothesis of mania and depression. Lancet. 1972;300:632–5. Article  Google Scholar  * van Enkhuizen J,

Janowsky DS, Olivier B, Minassian A, Perry W, Young JW, et al. The catecholaminergic–cholinergic balance hypothesis of bipolar disorder revisited. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;753:114–26. Article 

Google Scholar  * Furey ML, Pietrini P, Haxby JV, Drevets WC. Selective effects of cholinergic modulation on task performance during selective attention. Neuropsychopharmacology.

2008;33:913–23. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Bentley P, Vuilleumier P, Thiel CM, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Cholinergic enhancement modulates neural correlates of selective attention and

emotional processing. Neuroimage. 2003;20:58–70. Article  Google Scholar  * Bentley P, Vuilleumier P, Thiel CM, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Effects of attention and emotion on repetition priming and

their modulation by cholinergic enhancement. J Neurophysiology. 2019;90:1171-81. * Je Jeon W, Dean B, Scarr E, Gibbons A. The role of muscarinic receptors in the pathophysiology of mood

disorders: a potential noveltreatment? Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;13:739–49. Article  Google Scholar  * Modestin, J, Hunger, J, Schwartz, R. Uber die depressogene Wirkung yon Physostigmin.

_Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten_. 1973;218:67–77. * Janowsky DS, Khaled El Yousef M, Davis JM. Acetylcholine and depression. Psychosom Med. 1974;36:248–57. Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Risch SC, Cohen RM, Janowsky DS, Kalin NH, Sitaram N, Gillin JC, et al. Physostigmine induction of depressive symptomatology in normal human subjects. Psychiatry Res.

1981;4:89–94. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * KL Davis, LE Hollister, J Overall, A Johnson, K. Train psycho pharmacology physostigmine: effects on cognition and affect in normal subjects.

Psychopharmacology. 1976;27:23–27. * Janowsky DS, Risch SC, Kennedy B, Ziegler M, Huey L. Central muscarinic effects of physostigmine on mood, cardiovascular function, pituitary and adrenal

neuroendocrine release. Psychopharmacol. 1986;89:150–4. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Risch SC, Janowsky DS, Mott MA, Gillin JC, Kalir HH, Huey LY, et al. Central and peripheral

cholinesterase inhibition: effects on anterior pituitary and sympathomimetic function. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1986;11:221–30. * Carroll BJ, Greden JF, Haskett R, Feinberg M, Albala AA,

Martin FI, et al. Neurotransmitter studies of neuroendocrine pathology in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1980;280:183–99. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Fleischhacker WW, Barnas C,

Günther V, Meise U, Stuppäck C, Unterweger B. Mood-altering effects of biperiden in healthy volunteers. J Affect Disord. 1987;12:153–7. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Carroll BJ, Frazer A,

Schless A, Mendels, J. Cholinergic reversal of manic symptoms. Lancet. 1972;299:427–8. * Kenneth LD, Berger PA, Hollister LE, Defraites E. Physostigmine Cholinergic. Arch Gen Psychiatry.

1978;35:119–22. * Shopsin B, Janowsky D, Davis J, Gershon S. Rebound phenomena in manic patients following physostigmine. Neuropsychobiology. 1975;1:180–7. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Janowsky DS, El-Yousef MK, Davis JM, Sekerke HJ. Parasympathetic suppression of manic symptoms by physostigmine. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973;28:542–7. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Janowsky

DS, El-yousefjohn K, Dais M, Hubbard B, Sekerke HJ. Cholinergic reversal of manic symptoms. Lancet. 1971;299:1236–7. * Scarr E. Muscarinic receptors: their roles in disorders of the central

nervous system and potential as therapeutic targets. CNS Neurosci Ther 2012;18:369–79. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cannon DM, Carson RE, Nugent AC, Eckelman WC, Kiesewetter DO, Williams

J, et al. Reduced muscarinic type 2 receptor binding in subjects with bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:741–7. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cannon DM, Klaver JK, Gandhi SK,

Solorio G, Peck SA, Erickson K, et al. Genetic variation in cholinergic muscarinic-2 receptor gene modulates M2 receptor binding in vivo and accounts for reduced binding in bipolar disorder.

Mol Psychiatry. 2010;16:407–18. Article  Google Scholar  * Gosso FM, de Geus EJ, Polderman TJ, Boomsma DI, Posthuma D, Heutink P. Exploring the functional role of the CHRM2 gene in human

cognition: Results from a dense genotyping and brain expression study. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8:1–12. Article  Google Scholar  * Phillips ML, Ladouceur CD & Drevets WC. A neural model of

voluntary and automatic emotion regulation: implications for understanding the pathophysiology and neurodevelopment of bipolar disorder. 833–57.2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2008.65. *

Caseras X, Murphy K, Lawrence NS, Fuentes-Claramonte P, Watts J, Jones DK, et al. Emotion regulation deficits in euthymic bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder: A functional and

diffusion-tensor imaging study. Bipolar Disord. 2015;17:461–70. Article  Google Scholar  * Chase HW & Phillips ML. Elucidating neural network functional connectivity abnormalities in

bipolar disorder: toward a harmonized methodological approach. 1–22. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.12.006.Elucidating. * Strakowski SM, DelBello MP, Adler CM. The functional

neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a review of neuroimaging findings. Mol Psychiatry. 2005;10:105–16. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Townsend JD, Bookheimer SY, Foland-Ross LC, Moody TD,

Eisenberger NI, Fischer JS, et al. Deficits in inferior frontal cortex activation in euthymic bipolar disorder patients during a response inhibition task. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:442–50.

Article  Google Scholar  * Malhi G, Lagopoulos J, Sachdev P, Ivanovski B & Shnier R. An emotional Stroop functional MRI study of euthymic bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7:58–69.

* Rey G, Desseilles M, Favre S, Dayer A, Piguet C, Aubry JM, et al. Modulation of brain response to emotional conflict as a function of current mood in bipolar disorder: preliminary findings

from a follow-up state-based fMRI study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2014;223:84–93. Article  Google Scholar  * Elliott R, Ogilvie A, Rubinsztein JS, Calderon G, Dolan RJ, Sahakian BJ.

Performance of an affective go/no go task in patients with mania. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;55:1163–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.03.007. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Phillips ML, Drevets WC, Rauch SL, Lane R. Neurobiology of emotion perception II: Implications for major psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:515–28. Article  Google Scholar  *

Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9:242–9. Article  Google Scholar  * Mesulam M. Central cholinergic pathways neuroanatomy and some behavioral

implications. In Avoli M, Reader TA, Dykes RW & Gloor P, editors. Neurotransmitters and cortical function: from molecules to mind. Springer US: 1988. p. 237–60.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0925-3_15. * Furey ML, Pietrini P, Haxby JV, Alexander GE, Lee HC, VanMeter J, et al. Cholinergic stimulation alters performance and task-specific regional

cerebral blood flow during working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2002;94:6512–6. Article  Google Scholar  * Oduro KA. Glycopyrrolate methobromide 2. Comparison with atropine sulphate in

anaesthesia. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1975;22:466–73. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC; 2013.

* Luria RE. The validity and reliability of the visual analogue mood scale. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:51–57. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * FC Murphy, BJ Sahakian, JS Rubinsztein, A

Michael, RD Rogers, TW Robbins, et al. Emotional bias and inhibitory control processes in mania and depression. Psychological Med.1999;29:1307–21. * Tozzi L, Doolin K, Farrel C, Joseph S,

O'Keane V, Frodl T. Functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of emotion recognition and voluntary attentional regulation in depression: A generalized psycho-physiological

interaction study. J Affect Disord. 2017;208:535–44. Article  Google Scholar  * Lisiecka DM, Carballedo A, Fagan AJ, Connolly G, Meaney J, Frodl T. Altered inhibition of negative emotions in

subjects at family risk of major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46:181–8. Article  Google Scholar  * J Lang, P, M Bradley, M. & N & Cuthbert, B. _International Affective

Picture System (IAPS): Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual (Rep. No. A-8)_. _Technical Report A-8_ (2008). * Brodmann K. Brodmann’s Localisation in the Cerebral Cortex.

World Scientific. 1909. * McGaugh JL. The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:1–28. Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  * Perry A, Roberts G, Mitchell PB & Breakspear M. Connectomics of bipolar disorder: a critical review, and evidence for dynamic instabilities within interoceptive networks. Mol.

Psychiatry. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0267-2. * Hafeman D, Chang K, Garrett A, Sanders E & Phillips M. Effects of medication on neuroimaging findings in bipolar disorder:

an updated review. Bipolar Disord. 375–410.2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01023.x. * Dulawa SC & Janowsky DS. Cholinergic regulation of mood: from basic and clinical

studies to emerging therapeutics. Mol Psychiatry. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0219-x. * Ellis JS, Zarate CA, Luckenbaugh DA, Furey ML. Antidepressant treatment history as a

predictor of response to scopolamine: clinical implications. J Affect Disord. 2014;162:39–42. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to gratefully

acknowledge the participants for taking part in this research study. This work is dedicated to the memory of Dorothy May Reynolds Cannon. FUNDING This research is supported by the Irish

Research Council (IRC) Postgraduate Scholarship, Ireland awarded to Leila Nabulsi, PhD, and by the Health Research Board (HRA-POR-324) awarded to Dr Dara M. Cannon, PhD. We gratefully

acknowledge the participants and the support of the Wellcome-Trust HRB Clinical Research Facility and the Centre for Advanced Medical Imaging, St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Open

Access funding provided by the IReL Consortium. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Center for Neuroimaging, Cognition and Genomics (NICOG), Clinical Neuroimaging Lab, NCBES Galway

Neuroscience Centre, College of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33, Galway, Ireland Leila Nabulsi, Jennifer Farrell, Genevieve

McPhilemy, Maria R. Dauvermann, Theophilus N. Akudjedu, Pablo Najt, Srinath Ambati, Fiona M. Martyn, James McLoughlin, Derek Morris, Colm McDonald, Brian Hallahan & Dara M. Cannon *

Imaging Genetics Center, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging & Informatics Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, CA, 90292, USA Leila Nabulsi * College of

Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland Liam Kilmartin * Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry,

Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK Maria R. Dauvermann * Institute of Medical Imaging & Visualisation, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth Gateway

Building, St Paul’s Lane, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK Theophilus N. Akudjedu * Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Michael Gill, James Meaney &

 Thomas Frodl * Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany Thomas Frodl Authors * Leila Nabulsi

View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jennifer Farrell View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *

Genevieve McPhilemy View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Liam Kilmartin View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Maria R. Dauvermann View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Theophilus N. Akudjedu View author publications You can

also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Pablo Najt View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Srinath Ambati View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fiona M. Martyn View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * James

McLoughlin View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Michael Gill View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * James Meaney View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Derek Morris View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Thomas Frodl View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Colm McDonald View author publications You can also search for

this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Brian Hallahan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Dara M. Cannon View author publications You can

also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS LN: recruitment, analysis, writing; JF: data analysis; GMcP: recruitment; LK: data analysis; MRD: data analysis; TNA: data

analysis; PN: recruitment; SA: recruitment and analysis; FMM: recruitment; JMcL: recruitment; MG: recruitment; JM: recruitment; DM: data analysis; TF: data analysis; CMcD: recruitment and

editing; BH: recruitment and editing; DMC: design, funding, supervision of analysis and writing. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Leila Nabulsi. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional

affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License,

which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link

to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless

indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or

exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints

and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Nabulsi, L., Farrell, J., McPhilemy, G. _et al._ Normalization of impaired emotion inhibition in bipolar disorder mediated by cholinergic

neurotransmission in the cingulate cortex. _Neuropsychopharmacol._ 47, 1643–1651 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01268-7 Download citation * Received: 21 September 2021 *

Revised: 13 December 2021 * Accepted: 04 January 2022 * Published: 19 January 2022 * Issue Date: August 2022 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-022-01268-7 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you

share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the

Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative