The relationship between follicle-stimulating hormone and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in men

The relationship between follicle-stimulating hormone and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in men

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between male hormones and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in males. METHODS Data from


the Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination Survey (FAMHES) were used to analyze the male hormone levels between MAFLD patients and controls. Univariate and multivariate logistic


regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for MAFLD. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of male hormones for


MAFLD. RESULT A total of 1578 individuals were included, with 482 individuals (30.54%) of MAFLD, including 293 (18.57%) with mild disease and 189 (11.98%) with moderate-to-severe disease.


The MAFLD patients were significantly older than those without MAFLD. The LH, FSH, and SHBG levels in the MAFLD patients were significantly greater than those in the control group. Age, FSH,


LH, SHBG, and estradiol were all risk factors for MAFLD. Age, FSH, and LH were risk factors for moderate-to-severe MAFLD. FSH was an independent risk factor for MAFLD and moderate-to-severe


MAFLD. FSH showed an excellent diagnostic value, with an AUC of 0.992 alone and 0.996 after adjusting age. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that FSH may be a potential diagnostic and


predictive biomarker for MAFLD. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF THE TRIGLYCERIDE–GLUCOSE INDEX AND RELATED PARAMETERS IN METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION-ASSOCIATED FATTY


LIVER DISEASE Article Open access 02 January 2025 A SCREENING STUDY OF HIGH-RISK GROUPS FOR LIVER FIBROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION-ASSOCIATED FATTY LIVER DISEASE Article Open


access 10 October 2024 COMPARISON OF CARDIOMETABOLIC RISK FACTORS BETWEEN OBESE AND NON-OBESE PATIENTS WITH NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE Article Open access 04 September 2023


INTRODUCTION Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is the most common cause of chronic liver disease


worldwide and can progress to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, MAFLD is a major public health issue. A meta-analysis conducted in 2016


revealed that the prevalence of MAFLD in the general population is 25.24%, with the highest prevalence in the Middle East (31.79%) and South America (30.45%), and the lowest in Africa


(13.48%) [5]. Another meta-analysis conducted in 2019 reported that the pooled prevalence of MAFLD in China is 29.2%, and it has been increasing rapidly, from 25.4% in 2008–2010 to 32.3% in


2015–2018 [6]. With the rising incidence of obesity worldwide, the prevalence of MAFLD is also growing rapidly [3, 7]. Currently, a liver biopsy is regarded as the gold standard for


clinically diagnosing and staging MAFLD [7, 8]. However, its invasive nature makes it challenging to perform in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the identification of novel biomarkers


associated with MAFLD has become crucial for the early detection and assessment of MAFLD severity [9]. MAFLD is clinically highly associated with metabolic syndrome [10]. Besides causing


significant pathological changes in the liver, MAFLD also affects the function of other organs and systems, especially the endocrine system [11, 12]. MAFLD is a sex-dimorphic disease, with a


generally greater prevalence in men [13, 14]. Gender and sex hormones have a significant impact on various factors associated with MAFLD, such as genetic variants, cytokines, stress, and


environmental factors, which can modify the risk profiles and phenotypes of MAFLD in individuals [14, 15]. Testosterone is the major male hormone and is responsible for regulating many


metabolic processes, such as fat metabolism, insulin sensitization, and suppression of lipogenesis, besides maintaining normal sexual function and reproductive ability [16]. Several studies


have investigated the relationship between testosterone levels and MAFLD, but the results are inconsistent. Some studies have reported that a lower total testosterone (TT) level is


associated with a high prevalence of MAFLD and adverse clinical outcomes [17,18,19], while other studies have shown that there is no significant association between the testosterone level


and MAFLD [20, 21]. Luteinizing hormone (LH) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) are two key regulatory factors that regulate testosterone levels [22,23,24]. LH can promote testosterone


secretion by Leydig cells in the testis [24], while SHBG can bind to testosterone and affect its bioavailability in the body [22, 23]. A recent meta-analysis has shown that although a lower


testosterone level is associated with the severity of MAFLD, the relationship between SHBG and the severity of MAFLD remains controversial [22]. For example, a higher SHBG level was


associated with the severity of MAFLD in men with a body mass index >27 kg/m2, while a lower SHBG level was associated with the severity of MAFLD in men older than 50 years old [22]. Two


other studies found that SHBG was negatively correlated with MAFLD in men [25, 26]. Cao and collaborators showed that there was no association between LH and MAFLD in men, whereas women with


MAFLD had significantly lower levels of LH than those without MAFLD [25]. Furthermore, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is an important hormone regulating the proliferation and maturation


of germ cells [24]. FSH is reported to be associated with MAFLD in postmenopausal women [27,28,29]; however, studies regarding the relationship between FSH and MAFLD in men are limited.


Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between male hormones (LH, SHBG, FSH, and testosterone) and MAFLD in males, hoping to provide novel biomarkers for the


early identification of MAFLD severity and prognosis in patients with MAFLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS PARTICIPANTS This study was conducted using the data from the Fangchenggang Area Male


Health and Examination Survey (FAMHES), which is a population-based survey conducted from September 2009 to December 2009 among noninstitutionalized Chinese males aged 17–88 years old in


Guangxi, China, and has been used in many previous studies [30,31,32,33,34]. The aim of FAMHES was to investigate the impact of environmental and genetic factors, as well as their


interactions, on the development of age-related chronic diseases. A comprehensive population and health questionnaire was provided to 4303 male participants at the Medical Center of the


First People’s Hospital of Fangchenggang, and extensive physical examinations were conducted. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This human data is in accordance


with the Declaration of Helsinki. and the study was approved by the Guangxi ethics committee. All participants were requested for follow-up, which included another health questionnaire and


biochemical analysis of a fasting blood sample collected in the morning. A trained expert measured the height and weight of the participants using standard procedures. Participants were


excluded from this study if any of the following conditions were met: (I) currently diagnosed with diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, hyperthyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis,


inflammatory disease of the reproductive system, urinary diseases (infection, stone, hematuria, or hematospermia), prostatitis or history of any cancers; (II) taking any medication; (III)


with impaired liver function (alanine aminotransferase >2.0 times the upper limit of normal); (IV) with a history of excessive alcohol consumption (>40 mL/d); or (V) with impaired


kidney function (serum creatinine >178 mmol/L). After excluding participants who did not undergo complete clinical and laboratory tests or ultrasound examinations, a total of 1951


participants were available for analysis. It was found that 310 participants were positive for hepatitis B virus (determined by hepatitis B surface antigen detection), 45 participants were


excessive alcohol drinkers (>40 mL/d), 11 participants had at least one potential cause of chronic liver disease, and seven participants were taking medications known to cause fatty liver


imaging. After excluding these participants, 1578 males were finally included in this study (Fig. 1). ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION Two experienced ultrasound doctors [Cohen’s kappa of 0.621 (95%


CI 0.352–0.876)] performed abdominal ultrasound examinations on all patients using a portable ultrasound device (GE, LOGIQ, 5.0 MHz transducer, USA). The size, contour, echogenicity,


structure, and posterior attenuation of the liver were assessed for each participant. The ultrasound criteria for diagnosing a fatty liver included increased liver echogenicity (bright),


liver parenchymal echogenicity greater than that of the renal parenchyma, and blurring and narrowing of the hepatic vein lumen [35, 36]. According to the criteria described by Saadeh et al.


[36], all participants were divided into two groups (mild and moderate-to-severe). LABORATORY TESTS In the laboratory tests of FAMHES, all participants were required to fast overnight.


Samples containing approximately 10 mL of venous blood were collected from 8 am to 11 am the next day, frozen (~2 h), and sent to the testing center of the First Affiliated Hospital of


Guangxi Medical University in Nanning. The samples were centrifuged within 15–25 min and then stored at −80 °C until analysis. The serum samples were thawed at room temperature for 1 h and


then analyzed by inverting the test tube ten times. All analyses were performed by the same operator using the same batch of reagents. The blood lipid parameters were measured on an


automated analyzer (Dade Behring, USA) in the laboratory at the Fangchenggang. The FSH, LH, SHBG, estradiol (E2), and testosterone levels were determined using the COBAS 6000 system E601


(Elecsys module) and an immunoassay analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The inter-assay coefficients of variation were 3.6% for E2, 4.4% for SHBG, 4.3% for FSH, and 3.6%


for LH. The lower limit of detection for the assay was 0.05 pg/mL. Hormones were measured in nonfasting blood samples that were collected within 4 h after waking up, thus balancing the


diurnal variation of hormone levels. All measurements were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0.


Data distribution was analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Continuous data with a normal distribution were expressed as the mean ± standard derivation, while continuous


data with a non-abnormal distribution were expressed as the median (range). Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for MAFLD or moderate-to-severe


MAFLD in all collected factors. Parameters with a _P_ value less than 0.1 in univariate analysis entered multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for


MAFLD or moderate-to-severe MAFLD. The variance inflation factor was calculated to analyze the multicollinearity and variables with multicollinearity were excluded from the multivariate


logistic regression. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the diagnostic


performance of male hormones for MAFLD. A _P_ value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INCLUDED INDIVIDUALS Of the included 1578


subjects, 482 individuals (30.54%) were diagnosed with MAFLD, with 293 (18.57%) having mild disease and 189 (11.98%) having moderate-to-severe disease (Table 1). Therefore, these


participants were divided into three groups: control (1096 cases), mild MAFLD (293 cases), and moderate-to-severe MAFLD (189 cases). The MAFLD patients was significantly older than those


without MAFLD (_P_ < 0.001), and the patients with moderate-to-severe MAFLD were older than those with mild MAFLD (_P_ < 0.05). The LH, FSH, and SHBG were significantly greater in the


MAFLD patients compared to the control group (_P_ < 0.001). In addition, the LH, and FSH levels were greater in the patients with moderate-to-severe MAFLD compared to those with mild


MAFLD (_P_ < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the SHBG levels between the patients with moderate-to-severe MAFLD and those with mild MAFLD (Table 1). Moreover, the


levels of LH, FSH, and SHBG were all significantly greater in the MAFLD patients than in the control group among different age groups and increased in an age-dependent manner (_P_ < 0.05,


Table 2). Since age was a confounder for MAFLD, the parameters with a _p_ value less than 0.05 in Table 1 was further analyzed using age as a covariate. After adjusting age, LH, FSH, and


SHBG remained significantly higher in the MAFLD patients compared to the control group (Table 1). LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR THE RISK FACTORS OF MAFLD Univariate logistic regression


analysis showed that age, waist–hip ratio (WHR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), blood glucose (GLU), cholesterol (CHOL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL),


low-density lipoprotein (LDL), FSH, LH, SHBG, and E2 were all risk factors for the occurrence of MAFLD (all _P_ < 0.05) (Table 3). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified


that only FSH was an independent risk factor for MAFLD (_P_ < 0.001) (Table 3). According to the univariate regression analysis comparing the severe MAFLD patients with the mild MAFLD


patients, age, FSH, and LH were found to be risk factors for severe MAFLD (all _P_ < 0.05). Compared to the patients aged >45 years old, those aged <35 years old (OR = 0.341, 95%


CI: 0.197–0.589) or 35–45 years old (OR = 0.598, 95% CI: 0.398–0.898) had a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe MAFLD (_P_ < 0.05) (Table 4). Further multivariate regression analysis


revealed that only FSH was an independent risk factor for moderate-to-severe MAFLD (_P_ < 0.001) (Table 4). DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF MALE HORMONES FOR MAFLD We also analyzed the diagnostic


values of LH, FSH, TT, SHBG, and E2 for MAFLD. As shown in Fig. 2A, FSH showed an excellent diagnostic value, with an AUC of 0.992 (95% CI: 0.985–0.999); LH had an AUC of 0.710 (95% CI:


0.682–0.738); while TT, SHBG, and E2 only had AUC values of 0.446–0.597. After adjusting the age confounder, AUCs of all hormones were increased, with FSH presenting an AUC of 0.996 (95% CI:


0.991–1.000) and LH presenting an AUC of 0.788 (0.764–0.811) (Fig. 2B). DISCUSSION In the present study, we found that age, WHR, SBP, DBP, GLU, CHOL, HDL, LDL, FSH, LH, SHBG, and E2 were


all risk factors for MAFLD (all _P_ < 0.05). Moreover, the severity of MAFLD was correlated with age, FT, LH, and SHBG. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that FSH was an


independent risk factor for MAFLD as well as moderate-to-severe MAFLD. FSH showed an excellent diagnostic value, with an AUC value of 0.992. Age-adjusted FSH presents an AUC value of 0.996.


Univariate logistic regression analysis determined that LH and SHBG, but not TT affected the occurrence of MAFLD. Many studies have shown that serum testosterone concentrations decrease with


age, which is partly due to a decrease in the number and function of interstitial cells in the testes and a decrease in the pulsatile secretion of LH that stimulates interstitial cells


[37]. SHBG is a sex hormone-binding globulin synthesized by liver cells that protects sex hormones from adhesion as well as biological and chemical degradation [38]. The SHBG level in adult


males gradually increases with age, leading to more testosterone binding to SHBG [38]. Several previous studies have demonstrated that a lower TT level is associated with a high prevalence


of MAFLD [17,18,19], while other studies have found no significant association between the testosterone level and MAFLD [20, 21]. Moreover, in this study, multivariate regression analysis


revealed that only FSH was an independent risk factor. Many previous studies only compared the parameters between the MAFLD and control groups but did not adjust for confounders [17,18,19],


which may explain the controversial results. In the current study, we found that FSH was an independent risk factor for MAFLD as well as moderate-to-severe MAFLD. FSH is a glycoprotein


peptide hormone synthesized by the anterior pituitary gland that affects both the reproductive and nonreproductive systems. A recent study has demonstrated that FSH regulates hepatic lipid


metabolism in mice [39]. Additionally, a cross-sectional study has reported that high FSH level is associated with MAFLD in men aged over 80 years old [40]. Moreover, a recent study in a


Chinese elderly population (over 60 years old) consisting of both men and women has found that FSH is negatively associated with NAFLD in both men and women [41]. Our data were inconsistent


with these reports, which may be due to the difference in study populations. The above studies enrolled an elderly population, while our study had a much younger population. Here, we also


determined that FSH had an excellent diagnostic value for MAFLD, with an AUC of 0.992 alone and 0.996 after adjusting age confounder, indicating that FSH may be a potential diagnostic


biomarker for MAFLD. Our data suggest that MAFLD is related to male hormones. Previous studies have suggested a link between metabolic dysfunction and male reproductive health [42, 43].


Metabolic syndrome was reported to be associated with a decline in TT while no alterations in gonadotropin levels, and it was associated with hypogonadism, poor sperm morphology, testis


ultrasound inhomogeneity, and erectile dysfunction [44]. A meta-analysis of 21 studies revealed a J-shaped association between body mass index and abnormal sperm count [45]. Obesity is


negatively correlated with TT, LH, and SHBG [46], and affects male-factor infertility [47]. Our findings and these studies confirmed that metabolic dysfunction may affect male reproduction


health by regulating male hormones. However, further experiments are needed to uncover the underlying mechanism. This study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study and


the inherent bias associated with such a study design cannot be avoided. Second, crucial data on marital or fertility status, and history of (in)fertility were not collected. Male sex


hormones have been shown to correlate with male fertility status [48], which underscores the significance of these missing data. Therefore, our conclusion that FSH is a risk factor for MAFLD


should be applied with caution due to the lack of male fertility data. Third, we did not collect data on semen parameters and testicular ultrasound. However, FSH plays a crucial role in the


regulation of spermatogenesis [49]. and acts on Sertoli cells, the main component of the seminiferous tubules [50]. Increased levels of FSH may indicate abnormal spermatogenesis or


testicular damage. Therefore, the findings of this study should be interpreted with careful consideration of these unexamined factors. In conclusion, the present study identified that FSH is


an independent risk factor for both MAFLD and moderate-to-severe MAFLD and that it had a diagnostic value for MAFLD, with an AUC value of 0.992 alone and 0.996 after adjusting the age


confounder. Therefore, FSH may be a potential diagnostic and predictive biomarker for MAFLD, which warrants further clinical studies. DATA AVAILABILITY All the data were included in this


paper. REFERENCES * Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J. MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:1999–2014.e1.


Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Crane H, Gofton C, Sharma A, George J. MAFLD: an optimal framework for understanding liver cancer phenotypes. J Gastroenterol. 2023;58:947–64. Article


  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Venkatesan K, Haroon NN. Management of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2023;52:547–57. Article  PubMed 


Google Scholar  * Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international


expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73:202–9. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic


fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64:73–84. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhou F, Zhou J, Wang W, Zhang XJ, Ji YX,


Zhang P, et al. Unexpected rapid increase in the burden of NAFLD in China from 2008 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2019;70:1119–33. Article  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Fouda S, Pappachan JM. Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: a disastrous human health challenge. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2023;52:xv–xvi. Article  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Wang XJ, Malhi H. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:Itc65–itc80. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Makri E, Goulas A, Polyzos SA. Epidemiology,


pathogenesis, diagnosis and emerging treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Arch Med Res. 2021;52:25–37. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fouda S, Jeeyavudeen MS, Pappachan


JM, Jayanthi V. Pathobiology of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2023;52:405–16. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kapoor N, Kalra S.


Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and diabetes: a double whammy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2023;52:469–84. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Marschner RA, Arenhardt F, Ribeiro


RT, Wajner SM. Influence of altered thyroid hormone mechanisms in the progression of metabolic dysfunction associated with fatty liver disease (MAFLD): a systematic review. Metabolites.


2022;12:675. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Burra P, Bizzaro D, Gonta A, Shalaby S, Gambato M, Morelli MC, et al. Clinical impact of sexual dimorphism in


non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Liver Int. 2021;41:1713–33. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lefebvre P, Staels B. Hepatic sexual


dimorphism - implications for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2021;17:662–70. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lonardo A, Nascimbeni F, Ballestri S, Fairweather D,


Win S, Than TA, et al. Sex differences in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: state of the art and identification of research gaps. Hepatology. 2019;70:1457–69. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Zitzmann M. Testosterone deficiency, insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009;5:673–81. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yang LJ, Zhou JZ,


Zheng YF, Hu X, He ZY, Du LJ, et al. Association of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with total testosterone in non-overweight/obese men with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Endocrinol Invest.


2023;46:1565–72. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Apostolov R, Wong D, Low E, Vaz K, Spurio J, Worland T, et al. Testosterone is lower in men with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease


and alcohol-related cirrhosis and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2023:1–7. * Sarkar M, Yates K, Suzuki A, Lavine J, Gill R, Ziegler T, et al. Low


testosterone is associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis severity in men. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:400–2.e2. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * De Herdt C,


De Block C, Francque S, Verrijken A, Van Dessel K, Van Gaal L, et al. A cross-sectional analysis of the association between testosterone and biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease


in men with obesity. Endocrine. 2023;80:54–63. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Dayton KA, Bril F, Barb D, Lai J, Kalavalapalli S, Cusi K. Severity of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is not


linked to testosterone concentration in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0251449. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Mo MQ, Huang ZC, Yang ZH, Liao YH,


Xia N, Pan L. Relationship between total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin levels and the severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in males: a meta-analysis. Ther Adv


Endocrinol Metab. 2022;13:20420188221106879. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hua X, Zhang H, Yang W, Liu G, Zhang S, Wang Y. SFI, a sex hormone binding globulin based


nomogram for predicting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Chinese population. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1176019. Article  Google Scholar  * Oduwole OO, Huhtaniemi IT, Misrahi M. The


roles of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone in spermatogenesis and folliculogenesis revisited. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:12735. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Cao W, Xu Y, Shen Y, Wang Y, Ma X, Bao Y. Associations between sex hormones and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease in a middle-aged and elderly community.


Endocr J. 2022;69:1007–14. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhang X, Mou Y, Aribas E, Amiri M, Nano J, Bramer WM, et al. Associations of sex steroids and sex hormone-binding globulin


with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based study and meta-analysis. Genes. 2022;13:966. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Jung ES, Choi EK, Park BH,


Chae SW. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels are associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in post-menopausal Korean women. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1161. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Bertone-Johnson ER, Virtanen JK, Niskanen L, Nurmi T, Ronkainen K, Voutilainen S, et al. Association of follicle-stimulating hormone levels and risk of type 2


diabetes in older postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2017;24:796–802. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang N, Li Q, Han B, Chen Y, Zhu C, Chen Y, et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone is


associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese women over 55 years old. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:1196–202. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Gao Y, Wang M, Zhang


H, Tan A, Yang X, Qin X, et al. Are metabolic syndrome and its components associated with lower urinary tract symptoms? Results from a Chinese male population survey. Urology.


2012;79:194–201. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Qin X, Lin L, Mo Z, Lv H, Gao Y, Tan A, et al. Reference intervals for serum alpha-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen in Chinese Han


ethnic males from the Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination Survey. Int J Biol Markers. 2011;26:65–71. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Qin X, Lv H, Mo Z, Chen Z, Lin L,


Peng T, et al. Reference intervals for serum sex hormones in Han Chinese adult men from the Fangchenggang Area Male Health and Examination Survey. Clin Lab. 2012;58:281–90. PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Cai J, Lin C, Lai S, Liu Y, Liang M, Qin Y, et al. Waist-to-height ratio, an optimal anthropometric indicator for metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease in the


Western Chinese male population. Lipids Health Dis. 2021;20:145. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Qi N, Chen Y, Zeng Y, Bao M, Long X, Guo Y, et al. rs2274911 polymorphism


in GPRC6A associated with serum E2 and PSA in a Southern Chinese male population. Gene. 2020;763:145067. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Meziri M, Pereira WC, Abdelwahab A, Degott C,


Laugier P. In vitro chronic hepatic disease characterization with a multiparametric ultrasonic approach. Ultrasonics. 2005;43:305–13. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Saadeh S,


Younossi ZM, Remer EM, Gramlich T, Ong JP, Hurley M, et al. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:745–50. Article  PubMed 


Google Scholar  * Golan R, Scovell JM, Ramasamy R. Age-related testosterone decline is due to waning of both testicular and hypothalamic-pituitary function. Aging Male. 2015;18:201–4.


Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Song MJ, Choi JY. Androgen dysfunction in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Role of sex hormone binding globulin. Front Endocrinol.


2022;13:1053709. Article  Google Scholar  * Qiao S, Alasmi S, Wyatt A, Wartenberg P, Wang H, Candlish M, et al. Intra-pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone signaling regulates hepatic lipid


metabolism in mice. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1098. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhu Y, Xu J, Zhang X, Ke Y, Fu G, Guo Q. A low follicle-stimulating hormone level is a


protective factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in older men aged over 80. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:544. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Li X, Xin N, Guo T, Wu Z,


Zheng Y, Lin L, et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone is negatively associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a Chinese elderly population: a retrospective observational study. BMC


Endocr Disord. 2023;23:165. Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Cohen DJ, Giaccagli MM, Herzfeld JD, González LN, Cuasnicú PS, Da Ros VG. Metabolic syndrome and male fertility


disorders: Is there a causal link? Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021;22:1057–71. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Salvio G, Ciarloni A, Cutini M, Delli Muti N, Finocchi F, Perrone M, et al.


Metabolic syndrome and male fertility: beyond heart consequences of a complex cardiometabolic endocrinopathy. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:5497. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google


Scholar  * Lotti F, Corona G, Degli Innocenti S, Filimberti E, Scognamiglio V, Vignozzi L, et al. Seminal, ultrasound and psychobiological parameters correlate with metabolic syndrome in


male members of infertile couples. Andrology. 2013;1:229–39. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sermondade N, Faure C, Fezeu L, Shayeb AG, Bonde JP, Jensen TK, et al. BMI in relation to


sperm count: an updated systematic review and collaborative meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:221–31. Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Martins AD, Majzoub A, Agawal A.


Metabolic syndrome and male fertility. World J Mens Health. 2019;37:113–27. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Craig JR, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT, Hotaling JM. Obesity, male infertility, and


the sperm epigenome. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:848–59. Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Nunes DC, Ribeiro JC, Alves MG, Oliveira PF, Bernardino RL. Male sex hormones, metabolic syndrome, and


aquaporins: a triad of players in male (in)fertility. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1960. Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Christin-Maitre S, Young J. Androgens and


spermatogenesis. Ann Endocrinol. 2022;83:155–8. Article  Google Scholar  * Griswold MD. The central role of Sertoli cells in spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1998;9:411–6. Article  CAS


  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 82002397), Natural


Science Foundation of Hunan Province, (Grant Number: 2021JJ40868; 2023JJ60410), Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission (202207012427,202206032424). Changsha Soft


Science Project (Grant Number: kh2302010). Thanks for the support of National Traditional Chinese Medicine Advantage Specialist (Surgery) Funding. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These


authors contributed equally: Dong-Hua Bin, Fang Liu, Ke-Ping Peng. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Anus and Intesine, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,


Changsha, China Dong-Hua Bin & Min Zhan * Department of Ultrasoud, The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China Fang Liu * Department of


Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery, The first Hospital, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China Ke-Ping Peng * Department of Ultrasoud, The Second Xiangya Hospital,


Central South University, Changsha, China Yan Tan, Qiao Liu, Wang Tang & Gui-Xiang Tian * Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China


Zeng-Nan Mo * Department of Medical Equipment, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China Xiong-Jun Peng Authors * Dong-Hua Bin View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fang Liu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ke-Ping Peng View author publications


You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Min Zhan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yan Tan View author publications


You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Qiao Liu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Wang Tang View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Zeng-Nan Mo View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xiong-Jun Peng


View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Gui-Xiang Tian View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar


CONTRIBUTIONS D.-H.B., F.L., K.P.-P. performed experiments, analyzed data, and reviewed manuscripts. M.Z., Y.T., Q.L., W.T., and Z.-N.M. organized the study and supervised experiments.


G.-X.T. and X.-J.P. designed the project and prepared the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Xiong-Jun Peng or Gui-Xiang Tian. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The


authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional


affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution


and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if


changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the


material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to


obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS


ARTICLE Bin, DH., Liu, F., Peng, KP. _et al._ The relationship between follicle-stimulating hormone and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in men. _Nutr. Diabetes_ 14, 52


(2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00314-1 Download citation * Received: 17 October 2023 * Revised: 19 June 2024 * Accepted: 04 July 2024 * Published: 11 July 2024 * DOI:


https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00314-1 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not


currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative