Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Colon cancer has been proposed to be sustained by a small subpopulation of stem-like cells with unique properties allowing them to survive conventional therapies and drive tumor
recurrence. Identification of targetable signaling pathways contributing to malignant stem-like cell maintenance may therefore translate into new therapeutic strategies to overcome drug
resistance. Here we demonstrated that MEK5/ERK5 signaling activation is associated with stem-like malignant phenotypes. Conversely, using a panel of cell line-derived three-dimensional
models, we showed that ERK5 inhibition markedly suppresses the molecular and functional features of colon cancer stem-like cells. Particularly, pharmacological inhibition of ERK5 using
XMD8-92 reduced the rate of primary and secondary sphere formation, the expression of pluripotency transcription factors SOX2, NANOG, and OCT4, and the proportion of tumor cells with
increased ALDH activity. Notably, this was further associated with increased sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Mechanistically, ERK5 inhibition resulted in decreased _IL-8_
expression and NF-κB transcriptional activity, suggesting a possible ERK5/NF-κB/IL-8 signaling axis regulating stem-like cell malignancy. Taken together, our results provide proof of
principle that ERK5-targeted inhibition may be a promising therapeutic approach to eliminate drug-resistant cancer stem-like cells and improve colon cancer treatment. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING
VIEWED BY OTHERS CANCER STEM CELLS: ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER THERAPY Article Open access 05 July 2024 CONTINUOUS FORMATION OF SMALL CLUSTERS WITH LGR5-POSITIVE CELLS
CONTRIBUTES TO TUMOR GROWTH IN A COLORECTAL CANCER XENOGRAFT MODEL Article 29 July 2020 IGF-1-MEDIATED FOXC1 OVEREXPRESSION INDUCES STEM-LIKE PROPERTIES THROUGH UPREGULATING CBX7 AND IGF-1R
IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA Article Open access 27 February 2024 INTRODUCTION The identification of stem-like cells within tumors has reshaped our understanding of cancer
development, introducing an additional layer of complexity to the concept of intratumoral heterogeneity1. The existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) was demonstrated in several solid tumors,
including colon cancer2,3,4. Importantly, CSC populations are characterized by their remarkable potential to perpetuate themselves through self-renewal, while retaining the ability to
differentiate into the full repertoire of neoplastic cells forming the heterogeneous tumor mass5. Owing to their highly tumorigenic and adaptable phenotype, colon CSCs are currently
recognized as the only subset of neoplastic cells holding attributes for tumor initiation, sustained growth, and metastasis formation6. Moreover, colon CSCs show increased resistance to
conventional antitumor regimens7,8,9,10,11, arising as particularly well-suited feeders of tumor regrowth and relapse after initial response to chemotherapy6. Adding to the clinical
implications of the CSC concept, expression of stemness-associated signatures is associated with worse clinical outcomes in colon cancer patients12,13,14. Elucidation of the molecular
players regulating stem-like cell maintenance in colon cancer may therefore translate into new therapeutic strategies to overcome drug resistance and avoid tumor recurrence. Malignant
stem-like cells reproduce many of the signaling programs employed during embryonic development and tissue homeostasis15. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5 or BMK1) is a
non-redundant member of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family that operates within an exclusive MAPK kinase 5 (MEK5)-ERK5 axis to control cell proliferation, survival,
differentiation, and motility16. Targeted deletion of _Mek5_ and _Erk5_ in mice provided the first evidence for their essential role in development, leading to embryonic lethality at
mid-gestation due to defective endothelial cell function and cardiovascular formation17,18,19,20. In addition, MEK5/ERK5 signaling has been implicated in the regulation of
neurogenic21,22,23,24, myogenic25,26, and hematopoietic27,28,29 differentiation and lineage commitment. Mechanistically, ERK5 was proposed to act independently to maintain naive pluripotency
and control cell fate decisions in mouse embryonic stem cells, suggesting multiple critical functions for this kinase during differentiation30. In the intestine, activation of ERK5 is
triggered as a bypass route to rescue epithelial cell turnover upon _Erk1/2_ ablation31; however, the physiological relevance of this cascade in the gastrointestinal tract remains to be
elucidated32. On the other hand, substantial attention has been given to the link between aberrant MEK5/ERK5 signaling and the pathogenesis of colon cancer33,34,35,36. Dysregulation of both
MEK5 and ERK5 in human tumor samples is associated with more aggressive and metastatic stages of the disease33,34,35, and poorer survival rates34,35,36. Moreover, evidence from different
experimental models showed that ERK5-mediated signaling promotes tumor development, metastasis, and chemoresistance37, recapitulating the aforementioned features of colon CSCs6. However,
thus far, no relationship has been established between colon cancer stem-like phenotypes and MEK5/ERK5 signaling. In the present study, we show that MEK5/ERK5 signaling contributes to
sustained stemness in colon cancer, at least in part, through the activation of a downstream NF-κB/IL-8 axis. More importantly, we provide evidence that pharmacological inhibition of ERK5
may be a promising therapeutic approach to eliminate malignant stem-like cells, avoid chemotherapy resistance, and improve colon cancer treatment. RESULTS MEK5/ERK5 SIGNALING ACTIVATION
CORRELATES WITH COLON CANCER STEM-LIKE CELL PHENOTYPES Three-dimensional sphere models are widely used to selectively promote the growth of tumor cell populations with stem-like
properties38,39, representing a functional system for the in vitro discovery of new signaling pathways regulating self-renewal and differentiation in CSCs. In the present study, we used a
panel of established human colon cancer cell lines to generate sphere cultures. For this purpose, cells were grown in non-adherent conditions, using serum-free medium supplemented with
growth factors. Under this experimental setting, only malignant cells with stem cell features are expected to survive and proliferate, giving rise to free-floating multicellular spheres,
also known as tumorspheres38,39. After 1 week, HCT116, HT29, SW480, and SW620 cells were shown to efficiently form tumorspheres (Supplementary Figure S1a), which is in agreement with
previous observations40,41,42. Additionally, the expression levels of genes involved in intestinal cell differentiation, including _BMP4_, _CDX2_, _AQP3_, and _ADA_, were significantly
decreased in tumorsphere cultures, as compared with their adherent counterparts (_p_ < 0.05) (Supplementary Figure S1b). On the other hand, the expression profile of the
stemness-associated transcripts _SOX2_, _NANOG_, _OCT4_, and _BMI1_ was mostly enriched (_p_ < 0.05), further confirming that sphere-forming populations were enriched for undifferentiated
cells. To determine whether MEK5/ERK5 signaling may be a relevant player in colon cancer stem-like cells, we first analyzed the activation status of these kinases in tumorsphere and matched
adherent cultures. Immunoblot analysis showed that, except for HCT116-derived tumorspheres, colon cancer cells grown as spheres had significantly higher levels of MEK5 phosphorylation,
compared with monolayer-cultured cells (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 1a, upper panel). Further, ERK5 phosphorylation was shown to be consistently increased in tumorsphere cultures across all cell
lines tested (_p_ < 0.01) (Fig. 1a, lower panel), validating that MEK5/ERK5 signaling is overactivated in neoplastic populations enriched for stem-like cells. In turn, forced activation
of ERK5 by ectopic expression of a constitutively active mutant of MEK5 (CA-MEK5) in SW480 adherent cultures (Fig. 1b) was associated with lower expression of genes involved in
differentiation, and higher levels of stem cell markers, relative to empty vector control cells (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 1c). Changes in NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 were confirmed at the protein
level (Fig. 1d). Together, these findings demonstrate that MEK5/ERK5 activation correlates with a shift toward an undifferentiated state in colon cancer cells, suggesting that colon cancer
stem-like populations may be dependent on ERK5-mediated signaling. ERK5 INHIBITION SUPPRESSES COLON CANCER STEM-LIKE CELL PROPERTIES To address the functional role of MEK5/ERK5 signaling in
colon cancer stem-like cells, HCT116, HT29, SW480, and SW620 cells were plated as tumorspheres, and grown in the presence of XMD8-92, a small-molecule inhibitor of ERK543 (Fig. 2a, b).
Self-renewal was then measured according to second-generation sphere formation without any additional treatment. Consistent with our hypothesis, XMD8-92 significantly reduced the frequency
of primary and secondary tumorsphere formation (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 2c). This was further associated with the disruption of sphere morphology and size (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 2b, d), with
minimal effects on cell viability (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting that besides self-renewal, ERK5 inhibition also impairs the proliferative potential of stem-like malignant cells.
Worthy of note, sphere growth was conducted at clonal density (0.25-0.5 cells/μL) to avoid cell aggregation and sphere fusion. Single-cell assays confirmed the clonal origin of
tumorspheres44, as well as the ability of XMD8-92 to inhibit self-renewal and the rate of sphere formation in both HCT116 and SW620 cells (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 2e). Finally, to verify the
contribution of ERK5 to tumorsphere formation, ERK5 expression was specifically silenced by RNA interference in non-adherent HCT116 cultures (Fig. 2f, g). Interestingly, knockdown of ERK5
led to a marked decrease in the number (_p_ < 0.01) and size of HCT116-derived spheres (_p_ < 0.001) (Fig. 2h), phenocopying the effects of XMD8-92 treatment. These results demonstrate
that ERK5 inhibition depletes the population of sphere-initiating, self-renewing cells in colon cancer cultures. To investigate the molecular basis underlying the differential frequencies
of tumorsphere formation, the expression of core pluripotency transcription factors was next examined. ERK5 inhibition by XMD8-92 resulted in a significant downregulation of _SOX2_, _OCT4_,
and _NANOG_ in all cellular models under sphere-forming conditions, as assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 3a). These
results were further confirmed by immunoblot analysis in HCT116-derived tumorspheres (Fig. 3b). Similarly, flow cytometry analysis of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity, a
well-characterized marker of colon CSC subpopulations45, demonstrated a decrease in the proportion of ALDH-positive cells upon XMD8-92 treatment (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 3c). Taken together,
the aforementioned data demonstrate that ERK5 signaling inhibition suppresses malignant stem-like phenotypes and function, and support the notion that MEK5/ERK5 is required for sustained
stemness in colon cancer cells. ERK5 PHARMACOLOGICAL INHIBITION SENSITIZES COLON CANCER STEM-LIKE CELLS TO CHEMOTHERAPY Colon CSCs have been demonstrated to be highly resistant to
standard-of-care chemotherapy7,8,11, and combination strategies leading to the suppression of these therapy refractory cells may ultimately translate into improved treatment efficacy and
patient outcome. To evaluate the effect of ERK5 inhibition on cancer stem-like cell response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy, fully formed HCT116-derived tumorspheres were
treated with FOLFOX (5-FU plus oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (5-FU plus irinotecan), alone or in combination with XMD8-92 (Fig. 4a). Remarkably, XMD8-92-treated tumorspheres showed enhanced
sensitivity toward conventional FOLFOX and FOLFIRI treatment, as evidenced by an increase in cell death, compared to chemotherapy alone (_p_ < 0.01) (Fig. 4b). Consistent with these
observations, the combination of FOLFOX or FOLFIRI with XMD8-92 was further associated with increased caspase-3/7 activity (_p_ < 0.01) (Fig. 4c), PARP cleavage (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 4d,
left panel), and XIAP degradation (_p_ < 0.01) (Fig. 4d, right panel), demonstrating that ERK5 inhibition primes stem-like malignant populations to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. ERK5
INHIBITION SUPPRESSES INTERLEUKIN-8 EXPRESSION THROUGH AN NUCLEAR FACTOR-KB-DEPENDENT MECHANISM To identify mechanisms downstream of MEK5/ERK5 that might contribute to stem-like cell
maintenance in colon cancer, we performed a comparative PCR array analysis of genes associated with CSC features in HCT116 tumorspheres treated with XMD8-92 or vehicle control. A total of 13
genes were found to be differentially expressed in response to ERK5 inhibition (log2-transformed fold change below −1 or above 1) (Fig. 5a, b). In line with the functional and biochemical
characterization of tumorspheres, XMD8-92 treatment led to an upregulation of the differentiation factor _GATA3_, and a downregulation of the pluripotency factors _KLF4_ and _MYC_, and CSC
markers _PROM1_/_CD133_ and _PLAUR_/_CD87_. This was further associated with a decrease in the expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter _ABCG2_. On the other hand, inconsistent
effects were found for proliferation and migration-related genes (_KITLG_, _LIN28A_, _KLF17_, and _ZEB1_). Array results were validated by independent quantitative RT-PCR of a selection of
differentially expressed transcripts (Supplementary Figure S3). Apart from the impact of ERK5 inhibition on CSC-associated markers, gene expression profiling also revealed _NFKB1_ and the
nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)-regulated _CXCL8/IL-8_46 as being downregulated in XMD8-92-treated tumorspheres (Fig. 5a, b). Quantitative RT-PCR confirmed that treatment with XMD8-92 reduced
_IL-8_ expression in HCT116, as well as SW480 and SW620 tumorspheres (_p_ < 0.01) (Fig. 5c). Similar results were observed when genetically silencing ERK5 in HCT116 cells under
sphere-forming conditions (_p_ < 0.01) (Fig. 5d). These data suggest that elimination of tumor cell populations with stem-like traits through ERK5 inhibition might be a result of
downstream _IL-8_ repression. Conversely, _IL-8_ mRNA levels were enriched in tumorsphere models where MEK5/ERK5 signaling was found to be induced (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 5e), and in SW480
cells expressing CA-MEK5 (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 5f), supporting the existence of a functional link between ERK5 activation and interleukin (IL)-8 signaling. Inhibition of ERK5 has been
previously shown to suppress IκB phosphorylation, preventing its degradation and subsequent NF-κB activation33. Here we investigated the relevance of the interplay between ERK5 and NF-κB
signaling pathways in colon CSC. Consistent with previous observations in monolayer-cultured cells36, XMD8-92 treatment in HCT116-derived tumorspheres resulted in decreased IκB
phosphorylation, and increased IκB protein levels (_p_ < 0.01) (Fig. 6a). Moreover, using a luciferase reporter system, NF-κB transcriptional activity was found to be significantly
impaired following XMD8-92 exposure (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. 6b), mirroring the repression of _IL-8_ upon EKR5 inhibition, and suggesting a possible autocrine ERK5/NF-κB/IL-8 axis driving
stem-like cell malignancy. To investigate this further, NF-κB p65 and a dominant-negative-IκBα mutant (DN-IκBα) were respectively used to induce and block NF-κB activity in HCT116 cells
(Fig. 6c). Overexpression of NF-κB p65 led to a marked upregulation of _IL-8_, compared to empty vector cells, an outcome that was largely reversed by the addition of XMD8-92 (_p_ < 0.05)
(Fig. 6d). Conversely, DN-IκBα reduced _IL-8_ mRNA levels and abolished the effect of XMD8-92 in the expression of this chemokine. Overall, these data demonstrate that NF-κB is involved in
the regulation of IL-8 by ERK5, and provide a functional mechanism by which MEK5/ERK5 signaling contributes to the maintenance of stem-like properties in colon cancer. DISCUSSION In cancers
such as those of the colon, tumor initiation and progression occurs through aberrant activation and/or mutation of the same molecular mechanisms that control normal stem cell dynamics6,
within a network that goes beyond core pluripotency pathways, and is currently recognized to be controlled by multiple protein kinase cascades47. Exemplifying this phenomenon is the
MEK5/ERK5 signaling pathway, which has been shown to participate in both development and tumorigenesis16. In this framework, we hypothesized that ERK5-mediated signaling could contribute to
the maintenance of a stem-like population in colon cancer. Particularly, we demonstrate that MEK5/ERK5 activation is increased in several cell line-derived models enriched for malignant stem
cells (Fig. 1); and that ERK5 inhibition using XMD8-92 suppresses both self-renewal and the expression of colon CSC-associated markers (Figs. 2 and 3). In line with our results, ERK5 has
been previously identified as a critical player for sphere formation and tumor initiation in lung carcinoma cells48. Additionally, the suggested role of ERK5 in defining a CSC-like phenotype
is consistent with the notion that activation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) programs induces the acquisition of CSC traits that facilitate metastasis formation49. In this
regard, we have previously demonstrated that MEK5/ERK5 activation is associated with upregulation of the mesenchymal marker vimentin, promoting colon cancer cell invasive and metastatic
behavior in an orthotopic xenograft model33. Moreover, several other studies reported that MEK5 and ERK5 regulate EMT features, generation of circulating tumor cells, and metastatic seeding
in different tumor contexts50,51,52. Still, further investigation is required to evaluate the possible influence of ERK5-mediated signaling to the molecular mechanisms underlying the
connection between EMT and the CSC state. Apart from the role of malignant stem-like cells in tumor initiation and metastasis, the CSC concept also provides a framework to understand therapy
resistance6. Evidence from patient-derived three-dimensional cultures and xenograft models indicate that colon CSCs are intrinsically drug-resistant8,9,10,11. Moreover, the proportion of
cells expressing CSC-associated markers was found enriched within residual tumors of colon cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy7. Therefore, identification of targetable signaling
pathways controlling colon cancer stem-like phenotypes will undoubtedly fuel the development of combination regimens to overcome current therapy limitations. We have recently shown that ERK5
inhibition enhances the anticancer properties of 5-FU in a murine xenograft model of colon cancer36. Here we extend these earlier studies by revealing that XMD8-92 treatment sensitizes
HCT116 cancer stem-like cells to 5-FU-based chemotherapy (Fig. 4), establishing a novel strategy to eliminate drug-resistant populations generated upon phenotypic switching into the CSC
state. In parallel, we also found that ERK5 inhibition in tumorspheres leads to downregulation of _ABCG2_ (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Figure S3), a drug-efflux pump that is responsible for
acquired resistance to both 5-FU53 and irinotecan54, also contributing to CSC malignant properties55. Indeed, and in agreement with our results, the ERK5/MEF2 pathway has been proposed to
regulate the expression of several ABC transporters, among which _ABCG2_56. It is therefore possible that part of the mechanism behind the increased susceptibility of stem-like colon cancer
cells to chemotherapy upon ERK5 inhibition could involve _ABCG2_ repression. Finally, our data demonstrate that NF-κB-mediated _IL-8_ expression might be a fundamental element of CSC-like
function downstream of MEK5/ERK5 signaling (Figs. 5 and 6). In colon cancer, aberrant expression of the CXC chemokine IL-8, in tumor tissues or in circulation, was shown to be associated
with poor differentiation, depth of invasion, and distant metastasis57,58,59. Functionally, IL-8 signaling promotes EMT, stem cell-like traits, and chemoresistance60,61,62. Regarding CSCs,
the pro-inflammatory and angiogenic activity of IL-8 is known to be essential for the establishment of a supportive microenvironment for self-renewal and stem-like cell survival63. However,
according to our experimental conditions, we suggest that IL-8 expression by tumor cells might also contribute to sustained stemness through autocrine signaling. Indeed, a similar feedback
loop mechanism has already been proposed for the regulation of colon cancer cell proliferation and migration60,64. Strengthening our hypothesis, while NF-κB controls IL-8 expression46, this
chemokine is in turn responsible for triggering NF-κB transcriptional activity65. Consistently, NF-κB signaling has also been linked to CSC-like features in several solid tumors, including
glioblastoma, breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancer66,67,68,69. On the other hand, pharmacological inhibition and genetic knockdown of either MEK5 or ERK5 were reported to
suppress lipopolysaccharide-, IL-1β-, and tumor necrosis factor-α-induced production of IL-8 in primary human endothelial cells and monocytes70. Similarly, we demonstrate that specifically
silencing ERK5 recapitulates the effects of XMD8-92-mediated inhibition of ERK5 kinase activity, depleting the population of sphere-initiating cells (Fig. 2), and the expression of _IL-8_ in
HCT116 tumorspheres (Fig. 5). Nevertheless, we cannot fully exclude that putative XMD8-92 off-target activity may partially account for the observed phenotypic effects of this
small-molecule inhibitor against colon cancer stem-like cells71,72. Moreover, although cancer cell lines are representative of the different colorectal cancer molecular subtypes, which
validates their utility as tools to investigate tumor biology and drug response73,74, future studies will be necessary to evaluate the impact of ERK5 inhibition on patient-derived in vitro
and in vivo models. Taken together, our findings provide proof of principle that pharmacological inhibition of ERK5 may be an effective strategy to target self-renewing, drug-resistant colon
cancer stem-like cells. Adding to the clinical relevance of this signaling pathway, aberrant MEK5/ERK5 activation also contributes to increased tumor cell proliferation and metastasis33,
inducing a chemoresistant phenotype in both CSCs and non-CSCs36. The plurality of mechanisms through which ERK5 activity drives the process of tumorigenesis reinforces the therapeutic
potential of blocking this cascade in colon cancer treatment. Still, heterogeneous tumor masses comprising different populations of differentiated and cancer stem-like cells are expected to
be sustained by different oncogenic mechanisms. Therefore, the introduction of ERK5-targeting agents in clinical evaluation should be envisioned as part of combination regimens designed to
avoid resistance and tumor recurrence, bringing together conventional cytotoxic drugs and innovative targeted therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS CELL CULTURE Human HCT116, HT29, SW480, and
SW620 colorectal carcinoma cell lines were obtained from ECACC (Porton Down, UK), passaged for <6 months after resuscitation, and routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination using
Mycoalert detection kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Cells were cultured in adherent conditions in McCoy’s 5A (HCT116), RPMI 1640 (HT29), or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (SW480
and SW620), all supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic solution (all from Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK). For the
generation of tumorspheres, cells were grown in non-adherent conditions in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium containing 2% B27 supplement, 1% N2 supplement, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% sodium
pyruvate, 1% penicillin-streptavidin, 4 μg/mL heparin, 40 ng/mL recombinant human epidermal growth factor (all from Gibco) and 20 ng/mL recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor
(Peprotech, London, UK). All cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. SMALL MOLECULES AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS The ERK5 pharmacological inhibitor
XMD8-92 was obtained from Selleckchem (Madrid, Spain) and prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). Clinical-grade 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan were kindly provided
by Hospital São Francisco Xavier (Lisbon, Portugal), and diluted to stock concentrations in phosphate-buffered saline (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Stock solutions were aliquoted and
stored at −80 and −20 °C, respectively. All subsequent dilutions were freshly prepared in culture medium. Experiments were performed in parallel with DMSO vehicle control. Final DMSO
concentration was always 0.1%. CELL TRANSFECTION For overexpression experiments, CA-MEK5 plasmid (pWPI-MEK5DD; S313D/T317D) was kindly provided by Dr. Robert C. Doebele (University of
Colorado, CO, USA)75. Constructs for NF-κB p65 (pCMV4 p65)76 and DN-IκBα (pCMX IkB alpha M; S32A/S36A)77 were obtained from Addgene (#21966 and #12329, respectively). For small interfering
RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of ERK5, the MAPK7 Silencer Select was used (#s11149; Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific). HCT116 and SW480 cells were plated at 3 × 105 cells/well
on 35 mm dishes and transfected with either 1 μg of plasmid DNA or 80 nM of siRNA using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. In both cases, cells were allowed to grow for at least 24 h before further treatment or re-plating for tumorsphere formation. SPHERE-FORMING ASSAY To measure tumorsphere
formation, colon cancer cells were plated as single cells in 24-well ultra-low attachment plates (Corning, NY, USA) at 250–500 cells/well, and cultured in 1 mL serum-free DMEM/F12
supplemented with growth factors. After 8 days, spheres were collected, dissociated into single cells, and reseeded as above for secondary sphere formation. For each generation, the number
of tumorspheres was determined under an inverted microscope. Additionally, the number of cells per tumorsphere was quantified using trypan blue exclusion assay. Alternatively, cells were
sorted at a density of 1 cell/well into 96-well ultra-low attachment plates (BD FACS Aria III, BD Biosciences, CA, USA), and allowed to grow in 200 μL tumorsphere medium. The wells without
cells were excluded from analysis one day after plating, and a minimum of 90 wells per condition was considered. Sphere-forming efficiency was calculated after 14 days according to the
proportion of wells with tumorspheres versus initially seeded wells. In all cases, cells were allowed to adapt for 24 h and then treated with 4 μM XMD8-92 or DMSO vehicle control, except for
second-generation spheres, which were grown without further treatment. ALDEFLUOR ASSAY Cells with high ALDH enzymatic activity were identified using the Aldefluor assay (StemCell
Technologies, Grenoble, France) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 5,000–10,000 single cells were seeded in 5 mL tumorsphere medium using non-tissue culture-treated 55 mm
dishes (Gosselin, Hazebrouck, France), cultured for 24 h, and then treated with either 4 μM XMD8-92 or DMSO vehicle control. Eight-day tumorspheres were collected, dissociated into single
cells, resuspended in assay buffer containing 1.5 μM BODIPY-aminoacetaldehyde, and incubated for 40 min at 37 °C. Diethylaminobenzaldehyde (15 μM), a specific ALDH inhibitor, was used as a
negative control for each reaction. Samples were then centrifuged, resuspended in fresh assay buffer, and stored on ice until flow cytometric analysis. Sample acquisition was performed in a
BD LSRFortessa Cell Analyzer cytometer (BD Biosciences). A total of 10,000 cells were analyzed for each test and control sample pair, and the percentage of ALDHhigh cells was determined
using FlowJo software (version 10.0.7; Tree Star, CA, USA). CELL DEATH AND CASPASE ACTIVITY ASSAYS HCT116 cells were plated in 24-well ultra-low attachment plates and stem cell medium at a
density of 500 cells/well. Resulting 8-day tumorsphere cultures were treated for 3 days with FOLFOX (1.25 μM oxaliplatin plus 50 μM 5-FU), or FOLFIRI (1 μM irinotecan plus 50 μM 5-FU)
chemotherapeutic regimens78, alone or in combination with 4 μM XMD8-92. The in vitro cytotoxic effect of chemotherapy was evaluated using ToxiLight bioassay kit (Lonza) to measure the amount
of adenylate kinase (AK) released from plasma membrane-damaged cells into tumorsphere supernatants, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Further, the activity of effector caspases-3
and -7 was measured using Caspase-Glo 3/7 Assay (Promega, WI, USA). For this purpose, tumorspheres were collected at 300 × _g_ for 7 min, dissociated into single cells, and resuspended in
fresh growth medium. Cell suspensions were then mixed with an equal volume of Caspase-Glo 3/7 reagent, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature, protected from light. Resulting
luminescence was measured using the GloMax-Multi+ Detection System (Promega). Experimental AK release and caspase-3/-7 activity levels were normalized by the number of cells per well.
QUANTITATIVE RT-PCR For gene expression analysis, tumorspheres were grown and treated as described for Aldefluor activity evaluation. Additionally, comparative studies were conducted by
culturing colon cancer cells as monolayers in traditional medium supplemented with FBS. Total RNA was extracted using Ribozol (VWR International, PA, USA), treated with RNase-free
recombinant DNase I (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and reverse-transcribed to complementary DNA using the NZY First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (NZYTech, Lisbon, Portugal), all according to the
manufacturers’ instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed in 5 μL duplicate reactions on a 384-well QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher
Scientific), using the SensiFAST SYBR Hi-ROX kit (Bioline, London, UK), following manufacturer’s protocol. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1. For each sample,
quantification of gene expression was performed using the relative standard curve method and normalized to _ACTB_ levels. TOTAL PROTEIN ISOLATION AND IMMUNOBLOTTING Total protein extraction
and immunoblot analysis were performed as previously described36. Briefly, 40 μg of total protein extracts were denatured, separated on 8 or 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide
electrophoresis gels, and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Steady-state protein levels were evaluated using primary rabbit antibodies reactive to ERK5 (#3372), OCT4 (#2750; Cell
Signaling Technology, MA, USA), SOX2 (#AB5603, Merck Millipore, MA, USA), p-MEK5 (#sc-135702), PARP (#sc-7150), NF-κB (#sc-372), IκBα (#sc-371), or XIAP (#sc-11426; Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
CA, USA); or primary mouse antibodies against MEK5 (#sc-135986), NANOG (#sc-134218, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or p-IκBα (#9246; Cell Signaling Technology). β-actin (#A5541; Sigma-Aldrich)
and GAPDH (#sc-32233) were used as loading controls. Following incubation with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA), the
proteins of interest were detected by chemiluminescence using SuperSignal reagents (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific), on a ChemiDoc XRS+ imaging system (Bio-Rad). Densitometric analysis was
performed using the Image Lab software (version 5.1; Bio-Rad). GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING Differential gene expression between DMSO- and XMD8-92-treated tumorspheres was evaluated using the
Human Cancer Stem Cells RT2 Profiler PCR Array (PAHS-176Z; Qiagen, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each condition, pools were obtained by combining equal amounts
of total RNA from five different experiments. Complementary DNA synthesis was performed with 800 ng of DNase I-treated RNA (Roche) and the RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen). Real-time PCR was
run on a 384-well QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using the RT2 SYBR Green ROX qPCR master mix (Qiagen). Duplicate reactions for all genes, as well as
quality controls for genomic DNA contamination, reverse transcription efficiency, and PCR array reproducibility were included. Data analysis was performed using the GeneGlobe online platform
(https://www.qiagen.com/geneglobe/). Relative gene expression over control samples was determined as per the comparative cycle threshold (ΔΔCt) method and normalized to the geometric mean
of _B2M_ and _HPRT_ reference genes (ΔCt = Ctreference − Cttarget; ΔΔCt = ΔCtXMD8-92 − ΔCtDMSO). A cutoff value of log2-fold change (ΔΔCt) ≥ 1 was defined for the selection of differentially
expressed transcripts. Genes with Ct values above 34 or standard deviations between technical replicates superior to 0.5 were excluded from analysis. Results for each detectable gene are
shown in Supplementary Table S2. NF-ΚB LUCIFERASE REPORTER ASSAY NF-κB transcriptional activity was measured using the Cignal NF-κB Pathway Reporter Assay Kit (Qiagen), according to the
manufacturer’s specifications. Briefly, HCT116 cells were seeded at 2 × 104 cells/well on 96-well plates and transfected with 100 ng of luciferase construct harboring NF-κB response elements
using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Non-inducible and constitutively expressed firefly luciferase constructs were used as negative and positive controls,
respectively. A constitutive Renilla luciferase vector was included in all mixes (40:1) to normalize transfection efficiency and monitor cell viability. Sixteen hours post transfection,
cells were treated with 4 μM XMD8-92 or DMSO vehicle control. Luciferase activities were assayed 8 h after treatment using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega). STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean from at least three independent experiments. Statistical significances were determined using unpaired two-tailed
Student’s _t_-test. Values of _p_ < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. REFERENCES * Shackleton, M., Quintana, E., Fearon, E. R. & Morrison, S. J. Heterogeneity in cancer:
cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution. _Cell_ 138, 822–829 (2009). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ricci-Vitiani, L. et al. Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating
cells. _Nature_ 445, 111–115 (2007). Article CAS Google Scholar * O’Brien, C. A., Pollett, A., Gallinger, S. & Dick, J. E. A human colon cancer cell capable of initiating tumour
growth in immunodeficient mice. _Nature_ 445, 106–110 (2007). Article Google Scholar * Dalerba, P. et al. Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells. _Proc. Natl
Acad. Sci. USA_ 104, 10158–10163 (2007). Article CAS Google Scholar * Clarke, M. F. et al. Cancer stem cells–perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer
stem cells. _Cancer Res._ 66, 9339–9344 (2006). Article CAS Google Scholar * Zeuner, A., Todaro, M., Stassi, G. & De Maria, R. Colorectal cancer stem cells: from the crypt to the
clinic. _Cell Stem Cell_ 15, 692–705 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar * Wilson, B. J. et al. ABCB5 identifies a therapy-refractory tumor cell population in colorectal cancer patients.
_Cancer Res._ 71, 5307–5316 (2011). Article CAS Google Scholar * Todaro, M. et al. Colon cancer stem cells dictate tumor growth and resist cell death by production of interleukin-4. _Cell
Stem Cell_ 1, 389–402 (2007). Article CAS Google Scholar * Dylla, S. J. et al. Colorectal cancer stem cells are enriched in xenogeneic tumors following chemotherapy. _PLoS ONE_ 3, e2428
(2008). Article Google Scholar * Hoey, T. et al. DLL4 blockade inhibits tumor growth and reduces tumor-initiating cell frequency. _Cell Stem Cell_ 5, 168–177 (2009). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Colak, S. et al. Decreased mitochondrial priming determines chemoresistance of colon cancer stem cells. _Cell Death Differ._ 21, 1170–1177 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Merlos-Suarez, A. et al. The intestinal stem cell signature identifies colorectal cancer stem cells and predicts disease relapse. _Cell Stem Cell_ 8, 511–524 (2011). Article CAS Google
Scholar * de Sousa, E. M. F. et al. Methylation of cancer-stem-cell-associated Wnt target genes predicts poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. _Cell Stem Cell_ 9, 476–485 (2011).
Article Google Scholar * Dalerba, P. et al. CDX2 as a prognostic biomarker in stage II and stage III colon cancer. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 374, 211–222 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Karamboulas, C. & Ailles, L. Developmental signaling pathways in cancer stem cells of solid tumors. _Biochim. Biophys. Acta_ 1830, 2481–2495 (2013). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Nithianandarajah-Jones, G. N., Wilm, B., Goldring, C. E., Muller, J. & Cross, M. J. ERK5: structure, regulation and function. _Cell. Signal._ 24, 2187–2196 (2012). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Sohn, S. J., Sarvis, B. K., Cado, D. & Winoto, A. ERK5 MAPK regulates embryonic angiogenesis and acts as a hypoxia-sensitive repressor of vascular endothelial growth factor
expression. _J. Biol. Chem._ 277, 43344–43351 (2002). Article CAS Google Scholar * Regan, C. P. et al. Erk5 null mice display multiple extraembryonic vascular and embryonic cardiovascular
defects. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 99, 9248–9253 (2002). Article CAS Google Scholar * Yan, L. et al. Knockout of ERK5 causes multiple defects in placental and embryonic development.
_BMC Dev. Biol._ 3, 11 (2003). Article Google Scholar * Wang, X. et al. Targeted deletion of mek5 causes early embryonic death and defects in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase
5/myocyte enhancer factor 2 cell survival pathway. _Mol. Cell. Biol._ 25, 336–345 (2005). Article Google Scholar * Liu, L. et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 5 is necessary
and sufficient to specify cortical neuronal fate. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 103, 9697–9702 (2006). Article CAS Google Scholar * Li, T. et al. Targeted deletion of the ERK5 MAP kinase
impairs neuronal differentiation, migration, and survival during adult neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb. _PLoS ONE_ 8, e61948 (2013). Article CAS Google Scholar * Wang, W. et al.
Genetic activation of ERK5 MAP kinase enhances adult neurogenesis and extends hippocampus-dependent long-term memory. _J. Neurosci._ 34, 2130–2147 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Wang, W. et al. Inducible activation of ERK5 MAP kinase enhances adult neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb and improves olfactory function. _J. Neurosci._ 35, 7833–7849 (2015). Article CAS
Google Scholar * Dinev, D. et al. Extracellular signal regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) is required for the differentiation of muscle cells. _EMBO Rep._ 2, 829–834 (2001). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Sunadome, K. et al. ERK5 regulates muscle cell fusion through Klf transcription factors. _Dev. Cell_ 20, 192–205 (2011). Article CAS Google Scholar * Sohn, S. J., Lewis, G. M.
& Winoto, A. Non-redundant function of the MEK5-ERK5 pathway in thymocyte apoptosis. _EMBO J._ 27, 1896–1906 (2008). Article CAS Google Scholar * Wang, X. et al. The MAPK ERK5, but
not ERK1/2, inhibits the progression of monocytic phenotype to the functioning macrophage. _Exp. Cell Res._ 330, 199–211 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * Giurisato, E. et al. Myeloid
ERK5 deficiency suppresses tumor growth by blocking protumor macrophage polarization via STAT3 inhibition. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 115, E2801–E2810 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar
* Williams, C. A. et al. Erk5 is a key regulator of naive-primed transition and embryonic stem cell identity. _Cell Rep._ 16, 1820–1828 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * de Jong, P. R.
et al. ERK5 signalling rescues intestinal epithelial turnover and tumour cell proliferation upon ERK1/2 abrogation. _Nat. Commun._ 7, 11551 (2016). Article Google Scholar * Osaki, L. H.
& Gama, P. MAPKs and signal transduction in the control of gastrointestinal epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. _Int. J. Mol. Sci._ 14, 10143–10161 (2013). Article Google
Scholar * Simoes, A. E. et al. Aberrant MEK5/ERK5 signalling contributes to human colon cancer progression via NF-kappaB activation. _Cell Death Dis._ 6, e1718 (2015). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Hu, B. et al. Expression of the phosphorylated MEK5 protein is associated with TNM staging of colorectal cancer. _BMC Cancer_ 12, 127 (2012). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Diao, D. et al. MEK5 overexpression is associated with the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer. _BMC Cancer_ 16, 302 (2016). Article Google Scholar * Pereira, D. M. et al.
MEK5/ERK5 signaling inhibition increases colon cancer cell sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil through a p53-dependent mechanism. _Oncotarget_ 7, 34322–34340 (2016). PubMed PubMed Central Google
Scholar * Simoes, A. E., Rodrigues, C. M. & Borralho, P. M. The MEK5/ERK5 signalling pathway in cancer: a promising novel therapeutic target. _Drug Discov. Today_ 21, 1654–1663 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Weiswald, L. B., Bellet, D. & Dangles-Marie, V. Spherical cancer models in tumor biology. _Neoplasia_ 17, 1–15 (2015). Article Google Scholar *
Bielecka, Z. F., Maliszewska-Olejniczak, K., Safir, I. J., Szczylik, C. & Czarnecka, A. M. Three-dimensional cell culture model utilization in cancer stem cell research. _Biol. Rev.
Camb. Philos. Soc._ 92, 1505–1520 (2017). Article Google Scholar * Kanwar, S. S., Yu, Y., Nautiyal, J., Patel, B. B. & Majumdar, A. P. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway regulates growth and
maintenance of colonospheres. _Mol. Cancer_ 9, 212 (2010). Article Google Scholar * Bitarte, N. et al. MicroRNA-451 is involved in the self-renewal, tumorigenicity, and chemoresistance of
colorectal cancer stem cells. _Stem Cells_ 29, 1661–1671 (2011). Article CAS Google Scholar * Prabhu, V. V. et al. Small-molecule prodigiosin restores p53 tumor suppressor activity in
chemoresistant colorectal cancer stem cells via c-Jun-mediated DeltaNp73 inhibition and p73 activation. _Cancer Res._ 76, 1989–1999 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Yang, Q. et al.
Pharmacological inhibition of BMK1 suppresses tumor growth through promyelocytic leukemia protein. _Cancer Cell_ 18, 258–267 (2010). Article CAS Google Scholar * Pastrana, E.,
Silva-Vargas, V. & Doetsch, F. Eyes wide open: a critical review of sphere-formation as an assay for stem cells. _Cell Stem Cell_ 8, 486–498 (2011). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Huang, E. H. et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a marker for normal and malignant human colonic stem cells (SC) and tracks SC overpopulation during colon tumorigenesis. _Cancer Res._ 69,
3382–3389 (2009). Article CAS Google Scholar * Mukaida, N., Okamoto, S., Ishikawa, Y. & Matsushima, K. Molecular mechanism of interleukin-8 gene expression. _J. Leukoc. Biol._ 56,
554–558 (1994). Article CAS Google Scholar * Fernandez-Alonso, R., Bustos, F., Williams, C. A. C. & Findlay, G. M. Protein kinases in pluripotency-beyond the usual suspects. _J. Mol.
Biol._ 429, 1504–1520 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Song, C. et al. Inhibition of BMK1 pathway suppresses cancer stem cells through BNIP3 and BNIP3L. _Oncotarget_ 6, 33279–33289
(2015). PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Shibue, T. & Weinberg, R. A. EMT, CSCs, and drug resistance: the mechanistic link and clinical implications. _Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol._
14, 611–629 (2017). Article Google Scholar * Mehta, P. B. et al. MEK5 overexpression is associated with metastatic prostate cancer, and stimulates proliferation, MMP-9 expression and
invasion. _Oncogene_ 22, 1381–1389 (2003). Article CAS Google Scholar * Javaid, S. et al. MAPK7 regulates EMT features and modulates the generation of CTCs. _Mol. Cancer Res._ 13, 934–943
(2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * Pavan, S. et al. A kinome-wide high-content siRNA screen identifies MEK5-ERK5 signaling as critical for breast cancer cell EMT and metastasis.
_Oncogene_ 37, 4197–4213 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Yuan, J. et al. Role of BCRP as a biomarker for predicting resistance to 5-fluorouracil in breast cancer. _Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol._ 63, 1103–1110 (2009). Article CAS Google Scholar * Tuy, H. D. et al. ABCG2 expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas may predict resistance to irinotecan. _Oncol. Lett._ 12,
2752–2760 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Fang, D. D. et al. Expansion of CD133(+) colon cancer cultures retaining stem cell properties to enable cancer stem cell target discovery.
_Br. J. Cancer_ 102, 1265–1275 (2010). Article CAS Google Scholar * Belkahla, S. et al. Changes in metabolism affect expression of ABC transporters through ERK5 and depending on p53
status. _Oncotarget_ 9, 1114–1129 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Ueda, T., Shimada, E. & Urakawa, T. Serum levels of cytokines in patients with colorectal cancer: possible
involvement of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 in hematogenous metastasis. _J. Gastroenterol._ 29, 423–429 (1994). Article CAS Google Scholar * Terada, H., Urano, T. & Konno, H.
Association of interleukin-8 and plasminogen activator system in the progression of colorectal cancer. _Eur. Surg. Res._ 37, 166–172 (2005). Article CAS Google Scholar * Cacev, T.,
Radosevic, S., Krizanac, S. & Kapitanovic, S. Influence of interleukin-8 and interleukin-10 on sporadic colon cancer development and progression. _Carcinogenesis_ 29, 1572–1580 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Bates, R. C., DeLeo, M. J. 3rd & Mercurio, A. M. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colon carcinoma involves expression of IL-8 and CXCR-1-mediated
chemotaxis. _Exp. Cell Res._ 299, 315–324 (2004). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ning, Y. et al. Interleukin-8 is associated with proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and chemosensitivity
in vitro and in vivo in colon cancer cell line models. _Int. J. Cancer_ 128, 2038–2049 (2011). Article CAS Google Scholar * Hwang, W. L. et al. SNAIL regulates interleukin-8 expression,
stem cell-like activity, and tumorigenicity of human colorectal carcinoma cells. _Gastroenterology_ 141, 279–291 (2011). 291 e271-275. Article CAS Google Scholar * Korkaya, H., Liu, S.
& Wicha, M. S. Regulation of cancer stem cells by cytokine networks: attacking cancer’s inflammatory roots. _Clin. Cancer Res._ 17, 6125–6129 (2011). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Brew, R. et al. Interleukin-8 as an autocrine growth factor for human colon carcinoma cells in vitro. _Cytokine_ 12, 78–85 (2000). Article CAS Google Scholar * Manna, S. K. & Ramesh,
G. T. Interleukin-8 induces nuclear transcription factor-kappaB through a TRAF6-dependent pathway. _J. Biol. Chem._ 280, 7010–7021 (2005). Article CAS Google Scholar * Rajasekhar, V. K.,
Studer, L., Gerald, W., Socci, N. D. & Scher, H. I. Tumour-initiating stem-like cells in human prostate cancer exhibit increased NF-kappaB signalling. _Nat. Commun._ 2, 162 (2011).
Article Google Scholar * Liu, M. et al. The canonical NF-kappaB pathway governs mammary tumorigenesis in transgenic mice and tumor stem cell expansion. _Cancer Res._ 70, 10464–10473
(2010). Article CAS Google Scholar * Garner, J. M. et al. Constitutive activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and nuclear factor kappaB signaling in
glioblastoma cancer stem cells regulates the Notch pathway. _J. Biol. Chem._ 288, 26167–26176 (2013). Article CAS Google Scholar * Zakaria, N., Mohd Yusoff, N., Zakaria, Z., Widera, D.
& Yahaya, B. H. Inhibition of NF-kappaB signaling reduces the stemness characteristics of lung cancer stem cells. _Front. Oncol._ 8, 166 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Wilhelmsen, K.
et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 promotes acute cellular and systemic inflammation. _Sci. Signal._ 8, ra86 (2015). Article Google Scholar * Sureban, S. M. et al. XMD8-92
inhibits pancreatic tumor xenograft growth via a DCLK1-dependent mechanism. _Cancer Lett._ 351, 151–161 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar * Lin, E. C. et al. ERK5 kinase activity is
dispensable for cellular immune response and proliferation. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 113, 11865–11870 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Schlicker, A. et al. Subtypes of primary
colorectal tumors correlate with response to targeted treatment in colorectal cell lines. _BMC Med. Genomics_ 5, 66 (2012). Article CAS Google Scholar * Mouradov, D. et al. Colorectal
cancer cell lines are representative models of the main molecular subtypes of primary cancer. _Cancer Res._ 74, 3238–3247 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar * Doebele, R. C. et al. A
novel interplay between Epac/Rap1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 5/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (MEK5/ERK5) regulates thrombospondin to control angiogenesis. _Blood_
114, 4592–4600 (2009). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ballard, D. W. et al. The 65-kDa subunit of human NF-kappa B functions as a potent transcriptional activator and a target for
v-Rel-mediated repression. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 89, 1875–1879 (1992). Article CAS Google Scholar * Van Antwerp, D. J., Martin, S. J., Kafri, T., Green, D. R. & Verma, I. M.
Suppression of TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis by NF-kappaB. _Science_ 274, 787–789 (1996). Article Google Scholar * Wielenga, M. C. B. et al. ER-stress-induced differentiation sensitizes
colon cancer stem cells to chemotherapy. _Cell Rep._ 13, 489–494 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank Dr. Robert C. Doebele
(University of Colorado, CO, USA) for the kind gift of the pWPI-GFP expression construct encoding constitutively active MEK5. We also wish to thank Hospital São Francisco Xavier (Lisbon,
Portugal) for providing clinical grade 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. This work was supported by _Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia_ (FCT) through fellowships
SFRH/BD/88619/2012 (S.E.G.) and SFRH/BD/96517/2013 (D.M.P.). This project received funding from European Structural & Investment Funds through the COMPETE Programme and from National
Funds through FCT under the Programme grant SAICTPAC/0019/2015. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy,
Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal Diane M. Pereira, Sofia. E. Gomes, Pedro M. Borralho & Cecília M. P. Rodrigues Authors * Diane M. Pereira View author publications You can also
search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Sofia. E. Gomes View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Pedro M. Borralho View author
publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Cecília M. P. Rodrigues View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Cecília M. P. Rodrigues. ETHICS DECLARATIONS CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Edited by I. Lavrik SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPP.
MATERIAL RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and
reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes
were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If
material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS
ARTICLE Pereira, D.M., Gomes, S.E., Borralho, P.M. _et al._ MEK5/ERK5 activation regulates colon cancer stem-like cell properties. _Cell Death Discovery_ 5, 68 (2019).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-019-0150-1 Download citation * Received: 30 October 2018 * Revised: 21 November 2018 * Accepted: 29 November 2018 * Published: 11 February 2019 * DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-019-0150-1 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not
currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative