Understanding the molecular mechanisms that give rise to phenotypic diversity is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Ever since King and Wilson (1975) hypothesised that changes in gene

regulation may be important for species’ evolution, research has explored the various ways in which regulation of gene expression may have mediated evolutionary transitions and innovations.

So far, most studies have focused on changes in mRNA abundance, i.e., total gene expression. However, the regulation of genes is not restricted to their transcript levels but includes a wide

range of post-transcriptional mechanisms that affect transcript levels, functions, and/or transcript structures. These include the control of transcript levels through miRNAs (Filipowicz et

processes play a potentially important role in adaptation (Verta and Jacobs 2022; Singh and Ahi 2022; Wright et al. 2022). Alternative splicing (AS), a mechanism that can change the

composition of mature transcripts through the inclusion/exclusion of exons and introns and changes in exon length, is one of the best studied post-transcriptional mechanisms (Verta and

Jacobs 2022; Singh and Ahi 2022; Wright et al. 2022). Despite being discovered nearly 50 years ago (Berget et al. 1977; Chow et al. 1977), it wasn’t until a revolution in sequencing

technologies that the transcriptome-wide contribution of AS for evolution could be thoroughly investigated. Diversity in AS scales positively with organismal complexity (Chen et al. 2014),

lending support to the hypothesis that AS contributes to evolutionary divergence and innovation over macroevolutionary timescales. Recent technological and analytical developments have

further accelerated the investigation of post-transcriptional mechanisms in an expanded range of divergence-time contrasts from different organisms, including recently diverged ecotypes.

Thus, the evolution of post-transcriptional differences can now be studied over short evolutionary timescales and in natural systems in which divergent ecological selection is assumed to be

at its greatest, giving us more power to identify patterns of adaptive relevance. Furthermore, application of functional genomics tools in a rapidly growing breadth of non-model species can

potentially lead to the discovery of previously unknown post-transcriptional mechanisms of great evolutionary relevance. One such novel mechanism, small mitochondrially highly expressed RNAs

(smithRNAs) is highlighted in this issue. Stemming from the symposium “_Beyond transcription: the role of post-transcriptional regulation in adaptation and evolution_” organised as part of

the Congress of the European Society for Evolutionary Biology in Prague August 2022, this collection brings forth exciting articles that investigate evolutionary patterns in

post-transcriptional mechanisms (Fig. 1), mainly in AS, and further our understanding of the evolutionary significance of post-transcriptional mechanisms. In this issue, Innes et al. (2023)

show that AS plays a potentially important role in mediating fine-scaled adaptation of wild sunflowers to locally restricted sand dune environments alongside divergence in total transcript

levels. While AS influenced a more restricted set of genes compared to differential transcript abundance, both mechanisms of regulatory divergence contributed to separate ecotype

transcriptomes. Interestingly, the authors documented increased splicing and transcript abundance differences within inversion haploblocks separating locally adapted ecotypes, indicating

that genome structural variation may mediate local adaptation by changes in gene regulation, including the isoform diversity being expressed through AS. Further investigation of splicing

differences led the authors to identify phenotypes that may be involved in sand dune adaptation in sunflowers. As an example, genes controlling for seed development, abiotic stress response,

growth strategies, and root structure seem to be prime candidates for mediating local adaptation through AS. The evolutionary significance of AS in adaptation across large geographical

distances is exemplified by findings reported in this issue by Manahan and Nachman (2023), who identified splicing variation associated with local adaptation in wild house mice. By combining

RNA-seq, exome-capture, and existing data on targets of natural selection in a latitudinal transect of mice populations, the authors found strong candidate genes for which clinal variation

in AS associated with splicing-Quantitative Trait Loci (sQTL) and genomic signatures of selection. Strikingly, none of the identified candidate genes for local adaptation through AS

overlapped with genes known to contribute to adaptation through mRNA abundance, clearly demonstrating the unique roles of AS and total transcript levels in microevolution in this species.

The top candidate genes had functions associated with growth, body size, and metabolism, which are phenotypes known to differ in the latitudinal gradient. In wild house mice, AS thus seems

to provide an alternative mechanism for local adaptation that plays a role that is complementary to overall transcript levels. When environments fluctuate in a predictable manner, species

may adapt through an increase in phenotypic plasticity (Leung et al. 2020). Growing evidence indicates that AS might play an important role in mediating adaptive phenotypic plasticity

(Marden 2006; Grantham and Brisson 2018; Verta and Jacobs 2022), but direct evidence for selection on plasticity in AS has been lacking. As _cis_-regulatory sites controlling for AS are

often closely linked to the expressed gene, selection for plasticity in AS should lead to noticeable signatures in genetic diversity in gene loci. In this issue, Steward et al. (2024) tested

this exciting hypothesis by using a unique system of developmental plasticity in seasonal diapause in the butterfly _Pieris napi_. The authors characterised AS and total transcript

abundance through a time-series of development with and without diapause. The alternative developmental trajectories showed unique patterns of AS and transcript abundance changes, which

indicated plasticity in both types of transcriptional programs. Strikingly, plasticity in AS was associated with a reduced genetic diversity in gene loci, indicating that purifying selection

was acting to maintain plastic AS in seasonal diapause. These results highlight the multifaceted role that AS plays not only in local adaptation, but also in mediating plasticity in key

developmental transitions. Post-transcriptional regulation is not only limited to the alternative splicing of genes but involves a myriad of other processes that influence the stability or

function of gene products. Short non-coding RNA molecules, such as small interfering RNA (siRNAs) or microRNAs (miRNAs), have been shown to play key roles in the post-transcriptional

regulation of transcript and protein abundance by controlling the translation and stability of mRNAs (Filipowicz et al. 2008). To date, most work has focused on the interaction between

nuclear-encoded miRNAs and mRNAs. However, a recently discovered class of miRNA-like elements, smithRNAs, are transcribed in mitochondria but regulate nuclear genes (Pozzi et al. 2017). This

further expands the catalogue of potential post-transcriptional mechanisms. In this issue, Plazzi et al. (2023) review the literature around short non-coding RNA and estimate the

probability of de novo evolved smithRNAs to find a suitable target gene with a likelihood above one in a hundred million. The authors hypothesise that the high likelihood of finding a

suitable target gene without too many mismatches in the 3’mRNA region, combined with the high potential of smithRNAs to originate from mitochondrial RNAs, suggests an important role for

smithRNAs in the evolution of mito-nuclear interaction in animals. Furthermore, the divergence of smithRNA subsets between species could lead to mito-nuclear incompatibilities and thus

contribute to speciation, although this has not been empirically tested. Thus, this study highlights our ever-growing understanding of the evolution and functional role of

post-transcriptional processes, and their potential contribution to adaptation and speciation. The articles in this issue greatly add to our understanding of post-transcriptional mechanisms

in adaptation and speciation. This collection further suggests that AS and transcript levels can play both complementary and contrasting roles in local adaptation (Jacobs and Elmer 2021) by

affecting either the same or different sets of genes (Manahan and Nachman 2023; Innes et al. 2023). This highlights a greater need for large-scale comparative studies of AS to better

understand its broader role in adaptation. Furthermore, Steward et al. (2024) highlight a key role of purifying selection in maintaining plasticity in AS, suggesting that adaptive patterns

in AS are not only driven by divergent selection. Lastly, Plazzi et al. (2023) highlight the need to expand the focus of post-transcriptional mechanisms in adaptation past AS, and also focus

more on the role of short non-coding RNAs, those of nuclear and mitochondrial origin, in adaptation and speciation. While this collection of articles enhances our understanding of

post-transcriptional mechanisms in the context of adaptation, it also highlights that there is still a long way to go to fully unravel the complex contributions and mechanisms of

post-transcriptional processes in plasticity, adaptive evolution, and speciation. It is reasonable to expect that striking adaptive patterns in post-transcriptional mechanisms as highlighted

in this collection are the exception rather than the rule. Significantly more research is needed to evaluate the relative contributions of drift and selection in creating population-level

patterns in the frequencies of post-transcriptional phenotypes such as AS. What are the population genetic parameters that allow adaptive AS to evolve? Is there a common set of gene

functions across species that are susceptible for such evolution? How does the evolution of post-transcriptional mechanisms interact with genome evolution such as structural variation? Are

these patterns similar across the tree of life? We are entering an exciting era where such questions can be addressed with the full diversity of study systems and approaches, which is

certainly bound to renew our views about the mechanisms of evolutionary change. REFERENCES * Berget SM, Moore C, Sharp PA (1977) Spliced segments at the 5’ terminus of adenovirus 2 late

mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:3171–3175 Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar  * Chen L, Bush SJ, Tovar-Corona JM, Castillo-Morales A, Urrutia AO (2014) Correcting for

differential transcript coverage reveals a strong relationship between alternative splicing and organism complexity. Mol Biol Evol 31:1402–1413 Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Chow LC, Gelinas RE, Broker TR, Roberts RJ (1977) An amazing sequence arrangement at the 5’ ends of adenovirus 2 messenger RNA. Cell. 12:1–8 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

* Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N (2008) Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet 9:102–114 Article  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Grantham ME, Brisson JA (2018) Extensive differential splicing underlies phenotypically plastic aphid morphs. Mol Biol Evol 35:1934–1946 Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed

Central  Google Scholar  * Innes PA, Goebl AM, Smith CCR, Rosenberger K, Kane NC (2023). Gene expression and alternative splicing contribute to adaptive divergence of ecotypes. Heredity (in

this issue) * Jacobs A, Elmer KR (2021) Alternative splicing and gene expression play contrasting roles in the parallel phenotypic evolution of a salmonid fish. Mol Ecol 30:4955–4969 Article

  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * King MC, Wilson AC (1975) Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188:107–116 Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar  *

Leung C, Rescan M, Grulois D, Chevin L-M (2020) Reduced phenotypic plasticity evolves in less predictable environments. Ecol Lett 23:1664–1672 Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Manahan DN, Nachman MW (2023). Alternative splicing and environmental adaptation in wild house mice. Heredity (in this issue) * Marden JH (2006) Quantitative and evolutionary

biology of alternative splicing: how changing the mix of alternative transcripts affects phenotypic plasticity and reaction norms. Heredity 100:111–120 Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Plazzi F, Le Cras Y, Formaggioni A, Passamonti M (2023). Mitochondrially mediated RNA interference, a retrograde signaling system affecting nuclear gene expression. Heredity (in this issue)

* Pozzi A, Plazzi F, Milani L, Ghiselli F, Passamonti M (2017) SmithRNAs: could mitochondria “bend” nuclear regulation? Mol Biol Evol 34:1960–1973 Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  * Singh P, Ahi EP (2022) The importance of alternative splicing in adaptive evolution. Mol Ecol 31:1928–1938 Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Steward RA, Pruisscher P,

Roberts KT, Wheat C (2024) Genetic constraints in genes exhibiting splicing plasticity in facultative diapause. Heredity (in this issue) * Verta J-P, Jacobs A (2022) The role of alternative

splicing in adaptation and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 37:299–308 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wright CJ, Smith CWJ, Jiggins CD (2022) Alternative splicing as a source of

phenotypic diversity. Nat Rev Genet 23:697–710 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, He C (2017) Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat Rev

Mol Cell Biol 18:31–42 Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Ana Lindeza for commenting on this editorial. J-PV is supported by the

European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions grant agreement No 101103627. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions

expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or MSCA. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held

responsible for them. AJ is supported by the Natural Environment Research Council through an Independent Research Fellowship [NE/W008963/1]. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS *

Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Jukka-Pekka Verta * School of

Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK Arne Jacobs Authors * Jukka-Pekka Verta View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Arne Jacobs View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS J-PV and AJ contributed equally to the editorial

process and to writing the editorial. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Jukka-Pekka Verta or Arne Jacobs. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing

interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Associate editor:

Aurora Ruiz-Herrera RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Verta, JP., Jacobs, A. The evolutionary significance of post-transcriptional gene

regulation. _Heredity_ 132, 117–119 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-024-00674-5 Download citation * Received: 29 January 2024 * Revised: 01 February 2024 * Accepted: 01 February 2024

* Published: 16 February 2024 * Issue Date: March 2024 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-024-00674-5 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this

content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative