ABSTRACT Twin-thickness-controlled plastic deformation mechanisms are well understood for submicron-sized twin-structural polycrystalline metals. However, for twin-structural nanocrystalline

metals where both the grain size and twin thickness reach the nanometre scale, how these metals accommodate plastic deformation remains unclear. Here, we report an integrated grain size and

twin thickness effect on the deformation mode of twin-structural nanocrystalline platinum. Above a ∼10 nm grain size, there is a critical value of twin thickness at which the full

dislocation intersecting with the twin plane switches to a deformation mode that results in a partial dislocation parallel to the twin planes. This critical twin thickness value varies from

dislocation activities. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ATOMIC-SCALE OBSERVATION OF NUCLEATION- AND GROWTH-CONTROLLED DEFORMATION TWINNING IN BODY-CENTERED CUBIC NANOCRYSTALS Article

Open access 16 January 2024 TWINNING-ASSISTED DYNAMIC ADJUSTMENT OF GRAIN BOUNDARY MOBILITY Article Open access 18 November 2021 STRUCTURAL TRANSITION AND MIGRATION OF INCOHERENT TWIN

BOUNDARY IN DIAMOND Article 03 January 2024 INTRODUCTION The mechanical properties (such as strength, ductility, hardness, etc.) of a material are directly related to their atomic-scale

deformation mechanism1,2,3,4,5. Revealing the atomic-scale deformation mechanism of materials is important for understanding their mechanical performance and realising their desired

mechanical properties. In recent years, the atomic-scale deformation mechanism of twin-structural metals has attracted considerable interest because twin-structural metals always exhibit

excellent mechanical properties6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. The deformation mechanisms of twin-structural coarse-grained1,2 and sub-micrometre sized polycrystalline

metals1,2,4,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 have been extensively studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which has revealed that the twin boundaries (TBs) are not only more stable against

sliding or diffusion than conventional grain boundaries (GBs) but can also obstruct the partial dislocation that glides on the plane that is inclined to the TBs (strengthening deformation

model), thus making twin-structural metals very successful in terms of strength. For twin-structural nanocrystalline (NC) metals, in which both the grain size and twin thickness (TT) are

decreased to the nanometre scale, their atomistic deformation mechanisms remain unclear because direct atomic-scale observations are rarely acquired in experiments. Currently, our

understanding of the atomic-scaled deformation mechanism of twin-structured NC metals normally relies on molecular dynamic (MD) simulations15,16,17,18. A classic MD simulation reported that

the twin thickness (TT) can significantly affect the deformation model of face-centred cubic (FCC) metals16. For a given grain size, there exists a critical TT; for a TT above this point,

partial dislocations nucleate and form TB-GB intersections and glide on those {111} planes that are inclined to the {111} TB, leading to strengthening. For a TT below this point, partial

dislocations glide on the {111} planes that are parallel to the TBs, leading to softening. This mechanism has been supported by many other classic MD simulations16,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25

and thus promotes the widespread belief that the strengthening/softening of twin-structural NC metals is governed by partial dislocation behaviours, full dislocations and GB-mediated

plasticity (softening deformation model), even though they are rarely observed in experiments. Indeed, these MD simulations can provide important information for understanding the

deformation mechanisms of twin-structural metals. However, due to the lack of atomic-scale direct experimental evidence26,27,28,29, it remains uncertain whether these results are valid in

experimental conditions. Thus, atomic-scale dynamic experiments of twin-structured NC metals are important for fully understanding their deformation mechanisms. In this study, using a

homemade double-tilt high-resolution (HR) TEM tensile stage30,31, the plastic deformation mechanism of twin-structural NC Pt thin films are investigated in situ at the atomic scale. We

discover that both the grain size and TT can significantly impact the deformation model, and some of the deformation mechanisms a not observed in twin-structural NC metals. RESULTS

MICROSTRUCTURE OF THE PT NC THIN FILM The atomic-scale deformation experiments were conducted with a homemade tensile stage (as schematically illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1a-c). The TEM

investigations show many nanosized and equiaxed grains without obvious preferred orientation (Supplementary Fig. 1d shows a bright-field image). Most grains with a _d_ ranging between 4 and

30 nm are separated by high-angle GBs, and many grains contain growth twins (as indicated by arrows) with a TT ranging from ∼1 to 15 nm. Our extensive HRTEM investigations indicated that

before the thin film experiences tensile strain, the TBs are atomically flat, and no pre-existing dislocations were observed (refer to Supplementary Fig. 1e–h). IN SITU OBSERVATION OF

DEFORMATION MECHANISMS IN TWIN-STRUCTURAL NANOGRAINS Figure 1 shows two HRTEM images captured during tensile loading of a 10 × 16 nm nanograin, which shows the full dislocation nucleation

process in a relatively thick twin/matrix. Figure 1a shows an HRTEM image captured before the elastic limit is reached, in which the grain is free of defects. Figure 1b shows an HRTEM image

taken 10 s after taking Fig. 1a during loading, in which two full dislocations (marked as T) gliding on the {111} planes intersecting with the TBs are observed in a relatively thick

twin/matrix (originally defect-free). As noted by T, there is one set of {111} planes with an extra half plane inserted, indicating that full dislocations were blocked by the TB. In fact,

our extensive HRTEM investigations show that, in relatively thick twins/matrixes, full dislocation is commonly observed, and most of them glide on the {111} planes intersecting with the TBs.

Since the two full dislocations are near the regular GB and no dislocation debris was detected on the TBs, the full dislocations must not be emitted from TBs or TB-GB intersections but only

emitted from regular GBs. Figure 2a shows a typical HRTEM image showing several full dislocations that were blocked by the TBs in relatively thick twins/matrixes. Figure 2b shows an

enlarged HRTEM image that corresponds to the red framed region of Fig. 2a, which reveals the full dislocations blocked by the TB more clearly. As noted by T, an extra {111} plane was

inserted on the TBs, indicating that full dislocation was blocked by the TB. Figure 2c shows a typical HRTEM image of a grain that contains both thin and thick twins/matrixes. In relatively

thick twins/matrixes, we can see several full dislocations on the planes that intersect with the TBs and are blocked by the TBs, as marked by T These full dislocations can sometimes react

with TBs and in turn lead to new dislocation configurations, such as a Frank dislocation with a Burgers vector of 1/3[111], which segregates with a TB (see other examples in Supplementary

Fig. 2–5). In relatively thin twins/matrixes, several steps resulting from partial dislocation that is parallel with TB are directly detected, as marked with arrows. To investigate the twin

thickness effect on the deformation model in twin–structural NC Pt, the large grains that contain relatively thin twin/matrix were also investigated. Figure 3a–c shows three HRTEM images

captured 10 s apart with continuous straining of a nanosized grain. Figure 3a shows an HRTEM image taken when the straining was initially loaded on a twin-structured grain, in which a 4

atomic-layer thick twin/matrix with atomically flat TBs is clearly seen. With continued straining, a step in a TB with different positions can be found in Fig. 3b, c (as marked). A detailed

analysis of the step shown in Fig. 3b, c indicates that on the left side of the step, there are 4 atomic layers associated with the twin/matrix, while on the right side of the step, the

twin/matrix has 5 atomic layers. This structural feature is associated with a partial dislocation emitted from the right GB-TB intersection that moves towards the left during the straining.

The propagation of the partial dislocation creates an additional twined layer behind its movement, resulting in a total of 5 layered twin/matrix sections on the right side of the partial

dislocation. Apart from partial dislocations emitting from GB-TB intersections, we also simultaneously observed partial dislocations emitting from regular GBs, which are featured as stacking

faults (SF) that were observed in the grains. Figure 3d, e show a pair of HRTEM images captured 50 s apart under tensile loading of another nanograin that contains a 6 atomic-layer

twin/matrix. The plastic deformation process causes a 6 atomic-layered twin/matrix to grow into an 8 atomic-layered twin/matrix. Similar to the case shown in Fig. 3a–c, TB migration is

caused by the emission of a few partial dislocations from the GB-TB intersections, gliding through the grain along their TB. Interestingly, SFs (as arrowed) are also seen in both HRTEM

images, suggesting that there are also partial dislocations emitted from the regular GBs, which is based on the fact that unstrained nanosized grains should contain no dislocations. These

partial dislocations emitted from conventional GBs within relatively thin twins/matrixes can be frequently observed (see other examples in Supplementary Figs. 2–5). Based on extensive in

situ and ex situ HRTEM investigations, we found that for grains larger than ∼10 nm, the plastic deformation is mediated almost by full dislocations in the twins/matrixes with a TT > ∼ 6 

nm, and most of them move on the glide planes that intersect with the TBs, thus blocking or reacting with TBs. In relatively thin twins/matrixes, partial dislocations gliding on the planes

parallel with the TBs were commonly observed. On this basis, there indeed exists a TT effect on the plasticity mechanisms, i.e., full dislocation gliding and intersecting with TBs in

relatively thick twins/matrixes, while partial dislocation nucleation and gliding runs parallel with TBs in relatively thin twins/matrixes (see more examples in Supplementary Figs. 2–9). To

reveal the grain size effect on the deformation model of the twin-structural NC Pt, twin-structural grains with sizes below ∼10 nm were also investigated. Figure 4a–c provides a typical

example of an in situ observation of partial dislocation in an ∼6.5 × 6.5 nm sized grain. Three HRTEM images were captured 3 s apart during tensile loading. Figure 4a shows the loading

initially set on the twin-structural grain, and the atomically flat TBs can be clearly seen. With continued loading, two steps that resulted from two emitted partial dislocations can be

found in Fig. 4b, c (as marked by arrows). For grains with _d_ less than ∼6 nm, our in situ atomic-scale observations show that plastic deformation is controlled by GB-mediated plasticity in

lieu of lattice dislocation. Figure 4d–g shows four HRTEM images typical of in situ observations of grain boundary migration in an ∼4.0 × 6.0 nm sized grain. Figure 4d shows the initial

loading on the twin-structural grain. With continued loading, the grain shrinks from ∼4 × 6 nm to an ∼3 × 4.5 nm sized grain, as shown in Fig. 4d–g. In order to indicate the GB migration

more clearly, the boundary of G1 between other grains was highlighted using a dotted yellow line. On comparing the grain size of G1 in Fig. 4d, g, it is clear that grain G1 underwent the GB

migration. During straining, no change was observed for the lattice in grain G1, indicating that there was no global rotation of the sample. In addition, from Fig. 4d, G3 exhibited an

obvious fringe contrast, whereas the fringe nearly disappeared in Fig. 4g, indicating that G3 underwent slight out-of-plane rotation. We also measured the angle between the lattice/fringe

between G1, G2 and G3; there was no obvious change, indicating only slight out-of-plane rotation during the GB migration in this case. Apart from out-of-plane rotation during GB migration

(also see the other example in Supplementary Fig. 10), GB migration assisted by in-plane rotation was also observed (see the other example in Supplementary Fig. 11) whereas GB sliding was

rarely detected. This observation indicates that for the twin-structured NC, there also exists a transition in plasticity mechanisms, i.e., from intra-grain dislocation to a mode of

GB-mediated plasticity for grains with sizes below 6 nm (see other examples in Supplementary Figs. 10–12 and the statistical results in Fig. 5). To reveal the grain size and TT effect on the

plasticity transition, we statistically investigated more than 90 twin-structural grains with grain sizes _d_ varying from 4 to ∼30 nm and TTs ranging from 1 to ∼15 nm. Approximately

one-third were observed under in situ investigations, and the rest were observed ex situ. For the in situ observations, the plastic deformation model in twin-structured grains were directly

observed until crack nucleation. For the ex situ observation, we examined the twin-structured grains after the thin films fractured. The dislocation resulted in debris in twin-structured

grains and the behaviors can be clearly verified by in situ and ex situ HRTEM techniques (see Methods section). Figure 5 shows the statistical results of plasticity events for different

twins/matrixes and grains obtained from in situ and ex situ HRTEM observations. For those grains with _d_ > 6 nm, the TT is defined as the value of the twin/matrix that underwent

dislocation activities. For example, for a grain containing both thick and thin twins/matrixes, full dislocation was observed in a thick twin/matrix and partial dislocation detected in

another thin twin/matrix (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 2). Following this, we obtained two dots for a given grain size in Fig. 5, where the TT corresponds to the values of the twin/matrix

that underwent dislocation activities, respectively. While most of the grains with _d_ < 6 nm usually contain only one twin/matrix, we define TT as the average values of the twin and

matrix (see Fig. 4d–g and Supplementary Figs. 10–12). We can classify the twin-structural grains into 3 different categories. 1) For _d_ > ∼10 nm, there exists a transition in deformation

mechanisms that occurs at a critical TT; at this point, the plastic deformation from the nucleation and gliding of full dislocation intersecting with the TBs switch to partial dislocations

that are parallel with TBs. Interestingly, the critical TT value is different for different grain sizes: the smaller the grain size is, the smaller the critical TT. 2) For _d_ = 6–9 nm,

partial dislocation nucleation and glide on the planes parallel with the TBs dominate; there is no obvious transition from full dislocation intersecting with TBs to partial dislocation

parallel with TBs. 3) For _d_ < ∼6 nm, the plastic deformation is transferred from lattice dislocation to GB-mediated plasticity, i.e., GB migration. The results indicate that for

large-size twin-structural grains (above ∼10 nm), the deformation model affects both the grain size and TT, while in small-size twin-structural grains (below ∼10 nm), the deformation model

only affects the grain size. This is different from the twin-free grains, in which the strengthening and softening mechanisms are only affected by TT. DISCUSSION According to previous

experiments1,2,3,4,5,32,33,34 and MD predictions16,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,35,36,37, dislocations gliding and intersecting with TBs lead to strengthening, while dislocations gliding parallel

to the TBs result in softening. The statistical HRTEM data show an obvious double size effect on the strengthening and softening deformation model in twin-structured NC metals. First, the

grain size controls the strengthening and softening deformation model. As _d_ decreases, there is a transition from dislocation-controlled plasticity switching to GB plasticity-mediated

softening that occurs at a grain size of ∼6 nm. This transition is similar to twin-free NC metals with grain sizes smaller than ∼15 nm1,2,3,4,5,38,39. Second, for a given grain size (_d_ 

> ∼10 nm), the TT can significantly affect the deformation model. For relatively thick twins/matrixes, the plastic deformation is controlled by full dislocation nucleation and

intersecting with the TBs, leading to strengthening, while in relatively thin twins/matrixes, partial dislocation nucleation and gliding parallel to TBs lead to softening. More importantly,

the value of the critical TT for the transition is different for different grain sizes: the smaller the grain size is, the smaller the critical TT. According to a previous theoretical

prediction16, for a given grain size, the junction of the yielding stress versus TT curve and the Hall-Petch relation indicates the critical TT for the deformation model transition.

According to this prediction, the calculated critical TT is ∼6.7 nm for the grain with a size of 10 nm, while it is ∼8.5 nm for the grain with a size of 20 nm (see Supplementary Note 1 for

details)—this is consistent with our statistical results shown in Fig. 5. This indicates that the coupling of grain size and TT’s effects on the plastic deformation model that were reported

in our experiment and previous theory are universal in twin-structured FCC metals. Our statistical results show several outcomes that are different from previous MD simulations. First, in

previous MD simulations, the deformation model switches involve only partial dislocation, and full dislocation is rarely generated16,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,35,36,37. Our statistical

experimental results show that the plastic deformation was governed by full dislocations when above the critical TT for a given grain size. The transition from full to partial dislocation in

small-sized grains and relatively thin twins/matrixes due to the size effect and the SF energy of Pt (0.27 to 0.373 J/m2) is much higher than those of common FCC metals40,41,42,43,44,45.

According to a previous prediction40, there is a critical _d_ above which full dislocation activities would be preferred over partial dislocation activities, and this critical _d_ can be

significantly affected by the SF energy of metals. According to this theory, the calculated critical _d_ is about 33–88 and 7–9.5 nm for Cu and Pt, respectively (see Supplementary Note 2 for

details). This is consistent with the statistical result shown in Fig. 5. On this basis, we anticipate that for those metals with high SF energy (such as Pd, Ir), the plastic deformation in

large-sized grains and relatively thick twins/matrixes will be governed by full dislocations. For metals with low SF energy, such as Cu, Ag, and Au, partial dislocation can be frequently

observed. Second, the TT effect on the strengthening and softening deformation model in our results can only be observed in large-sized grains (_d_ > ∼10 nm); for the grains with _d_

ranging from 9–6 nm, only partial dislocation parallel with TBs was observed, while for grains with _d_ < ∼6 nm, the deformation was controlled by GB plasticity, and no intra-grain

dislocation activities were observed. Previous studies did not have a sufficiently small grain size and therefore missed this transition16,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,35,36,37. Thus, our in situ

atomic-scale results, together with previous atomistic modelling and simulations, advances our physical understanding of the mechanical behaviours of twin-structural NC metals. Here, the GB

migration assisted by GB atomic diffusion and grain rotation is similar to the previous MD simulation in both thin films and 3D NC samples46,47, where both grain rotation and GB migration

were observed. The observed deformation model for grain size below ∼6 nm indicated a previously reported switch from dislocation-dominated plasticity to GB-mediated plasticity (inverse

Hall-Petch deformation model) in NC metals, which is also valid for twin-structure metals. According to the well-known scaling law of Coble creep46,47,48, the relationship between the creep

strain rate \(\mathop {\varepsilon }\limits^.\) and the grain size _d_ is as follows: $$\it \it \it \it \it \it \bf \it \dot{\varepsilon

}=\,k\tau\frac{{{\mathrm{Ω}}\delta{\mathrm{D}}_g}}{{KTd^{\it{3}}}}$$ (1) where τ is the stress, Ω is the atomic volume, δ is the grain boundary width, _D_g is the GB diffusivity, _K_ is the

Boltzmann constant, and _T_ is the absolute temperature; _k_ is a constant related to grain geometry. According to this equation, the strain rate due to GB diffusion would be enhanced by 3

orders of magnitude as the grain size is reduced by 1 order of magnitude. Thus, the very small grain sizes and high local stress in our twin-structured NC Pt could greatly facilitate GB

diffusion-assented GB migration and grain rotation. Our statistical results demonstrate that 43.4% of grains have dislocations emitted from conventional GBs (as shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2a, b,

Supplementary Figs. 2–5, Supplementary Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 7b, Supplementary Fig. 7c), 34.2% of grains have dislocations emitted from GB-TB intersections (Figs. 3c, 4c, Supplementary

Fig. 6b, Supplementary Fig. 7a, Supplementary Fig. 8, Supplementary Fig. 9), and 22.4% of grains have dislocations emitted from both GB-TB intersections and conventional GBs (Figs. 2c,

3d–e). This indicates that conventional GBs are also essential dislocation sources in twin-structural nanograins, which is consistent with MD simulations16. To understand why conventional

GBs are an important dislocation source, quantitative lattice strain analysis was performed using lattice distortion analysis49 on the HRTEM images of twin-structural nanograins during the

leading process. Figure 6a, b show HRTEM images taken from 2 different twin-structural nanograins captured during the loading process. Figure 6c, d show their corresponding strain maps, and

the colour variation corresponds to the different strain values, as indicated in the figures. From the strain maps, strain concentration was observed both near the TB-GB intersection and at

the conventional GB. The corresponding quantitative strains, extracted from the coloured strain maps of Fig. 6c, d by using intensity line scanning from top to bottom along the GB (as red

line noted), are shown in Fig. 6e, f, respectively. The zero points were denoted by Ref. As noted with arrows, strain that concentrated at both conventional GBs and GB–TB intersections can

be observed, and many conventional GBs had an even higher strain concentration than the GB–TB intersections. Considering that the strain was measured before the dislocation emission, the

local stress values can be roughly estimated through Young’s modulus and multiplied by the elastic strain. From the strain map (Fig. 6e, f), most of the region near GB sustained ∼3% strain,

which is in the elastic strain region of nanostructured Pt50. By assuming Young’s modulus of Pt as a constant of 168 GPa, a majority of the region near GB sustained stress of ∼5.04 GPa.

These high-strain sites are prone to generating dislocations. During straining, the limited GB–TB intersections cannot provide sufficient dislocation nucleation sites; thus, the high-strain

sites in conventional GBs become essential sources for generating dislocations26,32,33,34,35,36 to accommodate large plastic deformations. It should be noted that beside the grain size and

TT can affect the deformation mechanism, the loading orientation can also significantly impact the deformation mechanism of twin-structure materials. Previous studies on Cu revealed that by

changing the loading orientation with respect to the TBs, the deformation mechanism switches among three dislocation modes: a dislocation glide between the twins/matrixes, dislocation

transfer across TBs, and partial dislocation resulting in TB migration8. For this study, we have not considered the effect of the loading direction on the deformation mechanisms as the

twin-structural grains in our sample were random distributed without obvious preferred orientation (as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1d). During deformation, the angle between the TBs and the

loading direction is varied for different twin-structural grains, which poses a challenge in terms of investigating the effect of loading orientation on the deformation mechanism. The

observed grain size and TT effect on the plasticity of NC Pt were similar to that in previous studies on Cu8,16. Based on this, we believe that our observed mechanism should be valid for

those high-SF energy metals that consist of random distributed twin-structural grains. In summary, atomic-scale and quickly resolved dynamic deformations in twin-structural Pt nanograins

with various grain sizes and TTs have been investigated. The main discoveries are as follows: (1) The experimental atomic-scale plastic deformation provides evidence of twin-structural NC

metals that have rarely been evaluated experimentally. (2) There is evidence of a double strengthening and softening deformation model in twin-structural NC metals. (3) As the grain size

falls below ∼6 nm, the TT effect on the strengthening and softening deformation model is halted and switches to a GB-mediated plasticity. (4) GBs are an important dislocation source for

twin-structural NC metals, which can provide enough dislocation nucleation sites to accommodate the large strain. Our findings, together with previous simulations, advance our understanding

of the deformation mechanism of twin-structural NC metals, which is useful for designing high-strength yet ductile materials using GBs and TBs. METHODS IN SITU ATOMIC-SCALE TEM TENSILE

DEVICE The homemade TEM tensile stage consists of two thermally actuated bimetallic strips27,28,29,30 fixed in opposing positions on a TEM Cu-ring using epoxy resin. Each bimetallic strip is

made of two layers of different materials with a large difference in their thermal expansion coefficients to achieve a significant deflection at a relatively low operating temperature.

During the experiment, the bimetallic strips with attached thin films were loaded on a conventional TEM heat stage, the temperature controller accurately increased the temperature (below 80 

°C) of the double-tilt TEM heat stage, and the bimetallic extensor then exerted tensile force on the thin films. With this homemade device, the thin film specimens can be slowly and gently

deformed, and the double-tilt capability of the tensile stage can remain. Consequently, the strained grains can be oriented conveniently for high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) observations, and the

atomic-scaled deformation process can be recorded during tensile loading. The real-time evolution of the film was captured in situ along with deformation using a JEOL-2010 TEM (operated at

200 kV). TRANSFERRING THIN FILM TO THE TENSILE DEVICES The ∼15 nm thick Pt thin film was deposited on a Si (001) substrate at 300 °C by magnetron sputtering, and then the Si substrate was

etched away using a KOH solution (5 mol/L). Under an optical microscope, the Pt thin film was attached to the bimetallic extension actuator using epoxy resin. Thus, tensile deformation can

be ensured during the loading process. DISLOCATION SOURCE DETERMINATION HRTEM can directly verify the dislocation sources from the cores of dislocations and their associated SFs/debris in

twin-structured grains. When the partial dislocation nucleated from the GB-TB intersection and glided on the plane parallel with the TB, the resulting TB migration or stepped TBs can be

detected in grains (as shown in Fig. 3a–c). For the partial dislocations emitted from conventional GBs, whether gliding on the parallel planes or intersecting the TBs, the SF resulting from

partial dislocations can be observed, as seen in Fig. 3d, e. For those grains with partial dislocations both emitted from the GB-TB intersection and conventional GBs, both TB migration and

SF can be observed. For full dislocation behaviours, the (111) plane inserts an extra plane. All of these dislocation behaviours can be clearly detected by the HRTEM techniques shown in

Figs. 1, 2. DATA AVAILABILITY The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. REFERENCES * Zhu, T. & Li, J.

Ultra-strength materials. _Prog. Mater. Sci._ 55, 710–757 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Zhu, Y. T., Liao, X. Z. & Wu, X. L. Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline materials. _Prog.

Mater. Sci._ 57, 1–62 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. H., Zhang, Z. & Han, X. D. In situ experimental mechanics of nanomaterials at the atomic scale. _NPG Asia Mater._

5, e40 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, J. W. et al. Near-ideal theoretical strength in gold nanowires containing angstrom scale twins. _Nat. Commun._ 4, 1742 (2013). Article 

ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar  * Greer, J. R. & De Hosson, J. T. M. Plasticity in small-sized metallic systems: Intrinsic versus extrinsic size effect. _Prog. Mater. Sci._ 56, 654–724

(2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. H. et al. In situ atomic-scale observation of continuous and reversible lattice deformation beyond the elastic limit. _Nat. Commun._ 4, 2413

(2013). Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lu, L., Chen, X., Huang, X. & Lu, K. Revealing the maximum strength in nanotwinned copper. _Science_ 323, 607–610 (2009). Article  ADS 

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * You, Z. S. et al. Plastic anisotropy and associated deformation mechanisms in nanotwinned metals. _Acta Mater._ 61, 217–227 (2013). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Ma, E. et al. Strain hardening and large tensile elongation in ultrahigh-strength nano-twinned copper. _Appl. Phys. Lett._ 85, 4932–4934 (2004). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar

  * Pan, Q. S., Zhou, H. F., Lu, Q. H., Gao, H. J. & Lu, L. History-independent cyclic response of nanotwinned metals. _Nature_ 551, 214–217 (2017). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Shin, Y. A., Yin, S. & Li, X. Nanotwin-governed toughening mechanism in hierarchically structured biological materials. _Nat. Commun._ 7, 10772 (2016). Article  ADS  CAS 

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Lu, Q. H., You, Z. S., Huang, X. X., Hansen, N. & Lu, L. Dependence of dislocation structure on orientation and slip systems in highly oriented

nanotwinned Cu. _Acta Mater._ 127, 85–97 (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, Y. M. et al. Defective twin boundaries in nanotwinned metals. _Nat. Mater._ 12, 697–702 (2013). Article

  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hodge, A., Wang, Y. & Barbee, T. J. Mechanical deformation of high-purity sputter-deposited nano-twinned copper. _Scr. Mater._ 59, 163–166 (2008).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Seo, J. H. et al. Origin of size dependency in coherent-twin-propagation-mediated tensile deformation of noble metal nanowires. _Nano Lett._ 13, 5112–5116

(2013). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Li, X. Y., Wei, Y. J., Lu, L., Lu, K. & Gao, H. J. Dislocation nucleation governed softening and maximum strength in nano-twinned

metals. _Nature_ 464, 877–880 (2010). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yamakov, V., Wolf, D., Phillpot, S. R., Mukherjee, A. K. & Gleiter, H. Deformation-mechanism map for

nanocrystalline metals by molecular-dynamics simulation. _Nat. Mater._ 3, 43–47 (2004). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Frøseth, A. G., Derlet, P. M. & Swygenhoven, H. V.

Grown-in twin boundaries affecting deformation mechanisms in nc-metals. _Appl. Phys. Lett._ 85, 5863–5865 (2004). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Swygenhoven, H. V., Derlet, P. M. &

Frøseth, A. G. Stacking fault energies and slip in nanocrystalline metals. _Nat. Mater._ 3, 399–403 (2004). Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zheng, G. P., Wang, Y. M. & Li,

M. Atomistic simulation studies on deformation mechanism of nanocrystalline cobalt. _Acta Mater._ 53, 3893–3901 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Frøseth, A. G., Swygenhoven, H. V.

& Derlet, P. M. The influence of twins on the mechanical properties of nc-Al. _Acta Mater._ 52, 2259–2268 (2004). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhu, T., Li, J., Samanta, A., Kim, H. G.

& Suresh, S. Interfacial plasticity governs strain rate sensitivity and ductility in nanostructured metals. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 104, 3031–3036 (2007). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed

  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wei, Y. J. The kinetics and energetics of dislocation mediated de-twinning in nano-twinned face-centered cubic metals. _Mater. Sci. Eng. A_ 528, 1558–1566

(2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Shabib, I. & Miller, R. E. Deformation characteristics and stress-strain response of nanotwinned copper via molecular dynamics simulation. _Acta

Mater._ 57, 4364–4373 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Stukowski, A. & Albe, K. Nanotwinned fcc metals: Strengthening versus softening mechanisms. _Phys. Rev. B_ 82, 224103

(2010). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. H. et al. Grain rotation mediated by grain boundary dislocations in nanocrystalline platinum. _Nat. Commun._ 5, 4402 (2014). Article 

ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhong, L. et al. Slip-activated surface creep with room-temperature super-elongation in metallic nanocrystals. _Nat. Mater._ 16, 439–446 (2017). Article 

ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sun, J. et al. Liquid-like pseudoelasticity of sub-10-nm crystalline silver particles. _Nat. Mater._ 13, 1007–1012 (2014). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Zhu, Y. et al. Size effects on elasticity, yielding, and fracture of silver nanowires: In situ experiments. _Phys. Rev. B_ 85, 5112–5116 (2012). Google Scholar  * Yue, Y.

H. et al. Quantitative evidence of crossover toward partial dislocation mediated plasticity in copper single crystalline nanowires. _Nano Lett._ 12, 4045–4049 (2012). Article  ADS  CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. H. et al. In situ observation of dislocation behavior in nanometer grains. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 105, 135501 (2010). Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar

  * Zhou, H., Li, X., Qu, S., Yang, W. & Gao, H. A jogged dislocation governed strengthening mechanism in nanotwinned metals. _Nano Lett._ 14, 5075–5080 (2014). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed

  Google Scholar  * Zhang, Y. W., Wu, Z. X. & Srolovitz, D. J. Deformation mechanisms, length scales and optimizing the mechanical properties of nanotwinned metals. _Acta Mater._ 59,

6890–6900 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Jang, D., Li, X., Gao, H. & Greer, J. R. Deformation mechanisms in nanotwinned metal nanopillars. _Nat. Nanotechnol._ 7, 594–601 (2012).

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tschopp, M. A. & McDowell, D. L. Grain boundary dislocation sources in nanocrystalline copper. _Scr. Mater._ 58, 299–302 (2008). Article 

CAS  Google Scholar  * Wolf, D., Yamakov, V., Phillpot, S. R., Mukherjee, A. & Gleiter, H. Deformation of nanocrystalline materials by molecular-dynamics simulation: relationship to

experiments? _Acta Mater._ 53, 1–40 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhu, T. & Gao, H. Plastic deformation mechanism in nanotwinned metals: an insight from molecular dynamics and

mechanistic modelling. _Scr. Mater._ 66, 843–848 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Shan, Z. et al. Grain boundary-mediated plasticity in nanocrystalline Nickel. _Science_ 305, 654–657

(2004). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Schiotz, J. & Jacobson, K. W. A maximum in the strength of nanocrystalline copper. _Science_ 301, 1357–1359 (2003). Article  ADS  CAS

  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Chen, M. W. et al. Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline aluminum. _Science_ 300, 1275–1277 (2003). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Jin, Z. H.,

Dunham, S. T., Gleiter, H., Hahn, H. & Gumbsch, P. A universal scaling of planar fault energy barriers in face-centered cubic metals. _Scr. Mater._ 64, 605–608 (2011). Article  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Bernstein, N. & Tadmor, E. B. Tight-binding calculations of stacking energies and twinnability in fcc metals. _Phys. Rev. B_ 69, 094116 (2004). Article  ADS  CAS 

Google Scholar  * Wu, X. L. et al. New deformation twinning mechanism generates zero macroscopic strain in nanocrystalline metals. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 100, 095701 (2008). Article  ADS  CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. H. et al. Pastic deformation through dislocation saturation in ultrasmall Pt nanocrystals and its in situ atomistic mechanisms. _Nano Lett._ 17, 4733–4739

(2017). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. H. et al. Mechanically driven grain boundary formation in nickel nanowires. _ACS Nano_ 11, 12500–12508 (2017). Article  CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kumar, S., Li, X. Y., Haque, A. & Gao, H. J. Is stress concentration relevant for nanocrystalline metals? _Nano Lett._ 11, 2510–2516 (2011). Article  ADS  CAS 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Shimokawa, T., Nakatani, A. & Kitagawa, H. Mechanical properties depending on grain size of face-centered-cubic nanocrystalline metals using molecular dynamic

simulation. _JSME Int. J. Ser. A._ 47, 83–91 (2004). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Coble, R. L. A model for boundary diffusion controlled creep in polycrystalline materials. _J. Appl.

Phys._ 34, 1679–1682 (1963). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Wang, C. Y. et al. Size-dependent grain-boundary structure with improved conductive and mechanical stabilities in sub-10-nm gold

crystals. _Phys. Rev. Lett._ 120, 186102 (2018). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. H. et al. Size dependence of dislocation activities and independence on theoretical

elastic strain limit in Pt nanocrystals revealed by atomic-resolution in situ investigation. _Mater. Today Nano_ 2, 1 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Basic Science Center Program for Multiphase Evolution in Hypergravity of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51988101), The Beijing

Outstanding Young Scientists Projects (BJJWZYJH01201910005018), the NSFC (11722429, 51771104, 91860202), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Z180014), 111 project (DB18015) and the Fok

Ying-Tong Education Foundation of China (151006), and the Australian Research Council (DP190102243). AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Lihua Wang, Kui Du.

AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Beijing Key Lab of Microstructure and Properties of Advanced Materials, Beijing University of Technology, 100022, Beijing, China Lihua Wang, Chengpeng Yang, Libo

Fu, Yizhong Guo & Xiaodong Han * Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 110016, Shenyang, China Kui Du * Department

of Material Physics and Chemistry, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 100083, Beijing, China Jiao Teng * Department of Materials Science, Zhejiang University, 310008, Hangzhou,

China Ze Zhang Authors * Lihua Wang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Kui Du View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Chengpeng Yang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jiao Teng View author publications You can also search for

this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Libo Fu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yizhong Guo View author publications You can also search

for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ze Zhang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xiaodong Han View author publications You can also

search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS L.H.W. and K.D. contributed equally to this work. X.D.H. and Z.Z. designed the project and guided the research. L.H.W. conducted

the in situ TEM experiments. J.T. synthesised the thin films. K. D. performed the strain mapping and related discussion. L.H.W., K.D., C.P.Y., J.T., L.B.F., Y.Z.G. and X.D.H. wrote the

initial draft. X.D.H. and Z.Z. finalised the paper. All authors contributed to extensive discussions of the results. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Ze Zhang or Xiaodong Han. ETHICS

DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature Communications_ thanks Chuang Deng, Sheng Yin and Xiaoyan

Li for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in

published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION PEER REVIEW FILE RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit

to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are

included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and

your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this

license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Wang, L., Du, K., Yang, C. _et al._ In situ atomic-scale observation

of grain size and twin thickness effect limit in twin-structural nanocrystalline platinum. _Nat Commun_ 11, 1167 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14876-y Download citation *

Received: 18 October 2019 * Accepted: 03 February 2020 * Published: 03 March 2020 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14876-y SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link

with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt

content-sharing initiative