ABSTRACT Seminal fluid is rich in sugars, but their role beyond supporting sperm motility is unknown. In this study, we found _Drosophila melanogaster_ males transfer a substantial amount of

a phospho-galactoside to females during mating, but only half as much when undernourished. This seminal substance, which we named venerose, induces an increase in germline stem cells (GSCs)

and promotes sperm storage in females, especially undernourished ones. Venerose enters the hemolymph and directly activates nutrient-sensing Dh44+ neurons in the brain. Food deprivation

directs the nutrient-sensing neurons to secrete more of the neuropeptide Dh44 in response to infused venerose. The secreted Dh44 then enhances the local niche signal, stimulating GSC

SUPPRESSES SUGAR APPETITE AND REGULATES FOOD CHOICE IN _DROSOPHILA_ Article Open access 07 November 2022 CELLULAR METABOLIC REPROGRAMMING CONTROLS SUGAR APPETITE IN _DROSOPHILA_ Article 31

August 2020 ENTERIC NEURONS INCREASE MATERNAL FOOD INTAKE DURING REPRODUCTION Article 28 October 2020 INTRODUCTION Seminal fluid serves as a medium for sperm transport, yet its biological

functions extend far beyond this role. In humans, nearly 10,000 peptides or proteins are found in seminal fluid or are associated with sperm. These are involved in a variety of molecular and

cellular changes that occur in inseminated females, including uterine inflammatory responses, preparation of the uterine endometrium, and facilitation of preimplantation1,2. In addition to

peptides and proteins, seminal fluid also contains a substantial amount of fructose3. Fructose is recognized as an energy source for sperm motility and is a clinically important indicator of

male fertility4. The fruit fly _Drosophila melanogaster_ has emerged as a valuable model for unravelling the functions of seminal fluid proteins in female reproduction and sexual

selection5,6. For example, several studies have focused on the seminal fluid component sex peptide (SP). SP is produced by the male accessory gland (MAG), which is analogous to the mammalian

prostate. Upon insemination, SP enters the hemolymph and triggers a wide range of changes to female reproductive physiology and post-mating behaviors7,8,9. Like that of mammals, insect

seminal fluid also contains free sugars3. But beyond their role as an energy source for sperm motility, the signaling functions of these sugars remain unknown. Mating stimulates egg laying

and increases egg production. SP enhances oogenesis progression by fostering the development of pre-vitellogenic follicles into vitellogenic follicles10,11,12. Moreover, SP is implicated in

the generation of pre-vitellogenic follicles by inducing the proliferation of germline stem cells (GSCs). GSCs, located in the foremost region of each ovariole of the germarium in

_Drosophila_, are vital for the continuous production of gametes13. The transient increase in GSCs induced by SP is achieved through the participation of various endocrine or paracrine

factors, including ecdysteroids (20E) and octopamine (OA) from the ovary, and neuropeptide F (NPF) from the gut10,14,15. Courtship feeding is prevalent across taxa16,17,18, and in extreme

cases, mating induces some female insects to feed on male body parts19,20. _Drosophila_ exemplifies another form of courtship feeding referred to as seminal feeding, whereby males transfer

nutrient-rich seminal fluids to their mates21,22. In general, courtship feeding promotes male paternity because females typically prefer gift-giving males. Courtship feeding and food quality

are positively correlated with copulation duration, allowing for more sperm transfer23,24,25. There is also a clear link between courtship feeding and postcopulatory sexual selection26,27.

For instance, in the nursery web spider _Pisaura mirabilis_, females preferentially store more sperm from food gift-giving males than those offering no gift28. Preferential sperm uptake has

been observed in various animal species, often occurring via an alteration of the delay between copulation and sperm ejection (expulsion), namely the ejaculate holding period (EHP)29. EHP

length determines the amount of sperm stored, with longer EHPs resulting in more sperm storage30,31. Sperm ejection after a very short EHP was first observed in dunnock females mated with

subdominant males32. Since then, similar phenomena have been documented in many birds and insects including _Drosophila_33,34. Fruit flies exhibit various EHP durations, and one molecular

genetic study identified a brain pathway that regulates the timing of sperm ejection and therefore EHP. This brain pathway, comprising the neuropeptide diuretic hormone 44 (Dh44) and its

GPCR receptor Dh44-R1, is essential for establishing a normal EHP31. Loss of Dh44 or its receptor results in precocious sperm ejection, leading to a shortened EHP and reduced sperm uptake.

Intriguingly, the brain neurosecretory cells that produce Dh44 and regulate EHP (i.e., the Dh44-PI neurons) sense circulating sugars in the internal milleu35,36. These discoveries raise the

intriguing possibility that Dh44-PI neurons are involved in assessing courtship feeding and adjusting sperm uptake accordingly. Here, we identified venerose, a small sugar-like substance

abundant in seminal fluid, that affects GSC proliferation and preferential sperm uptake. Upon insemination, seminal venerose enters the female hemolymph, activating the brain Dh44-PI neurons

and triggering their secretion of Dh44. Then, Dh44 in the hemolymph stimulates GSC proliferation by elevating local GSC niche signals. The transfer of venerose from males to females could

be considered a form of courtship feeding, as venerose serves as the primary source of elemental phosphorus females absorb from the male ejaculate. In energy-deprived females, Dh44-PI

neurons respond to venerose by releasing a larger amount of Dh44, leading to a prolonged EHP, increased venerose absorption, and enhanced sperm storage. Importantly, this process enables

females to assess the energy levels of their mates. Under energy-deprived conditions, males decrease venerose production by approximately half. Consequently, females paired with these

energy-deprived males secrete less Dh44 compared to their counterparts mating with well-nourished males, resulting in a shorter EHP and reduced sperm storage. These findings reveal a

inter-sexual signaling pathway that is sensitive to nutritional status, suggesting its role in optimizing reproductive outcomes and influencing sexual selection during nutritional

challenges. RESULTS VENEROSE, A PHOSPHO-GALACTOSIDE ABUNDANT IN SEMINAL FLUID We employed mass spectrometry to identify sugars in male ejaculate but found no evidence of mass units

corresponding to glucose, trehalose, or fructose. Instead, we observed a robust signal at a molecular weight of 377, [M-H]− = 376.10142 (Fig. 1a). In subsequent examinations of male and

female reproductive tissue extracts, we found this peak was present exclusively in males and primarily localized to the MAG, the major source of seminal fluid substances (Fig. 1b,

Supplementary Fig. 1). Hereafter, we will refer to this substance as the _Drosophila_ venereal sugar or venerose. Venerose was the major peak in the hydrophilic eluent of MAG extracts (Fig. 

1b), with trace amounts also present in male ejaculatory ducts and testes (Fig. 1c). After deducing the molecular formula of venerose—C11H24O11NP—via electrospray ionization high-resolution

mass spectrometry ([M-H]− C11H23O11NP−, calculated _m/z_ 376.10142, found 376.10139, Δ 0.08 ppm mass error), we proceeded to a structural identification via 1H, 13C, and 31P NMR and 2D NMR

spectral analyses (Supplementary Table 1; Supplementary Fig. 2). The combined 1H-1H COSY, 13C-1H HMQC, and HMBC spectra revealed the structure of venerose as

1-_O_-[4-_O_-(2-aminoethylphosphate)-β-D-galactopyranosyl]-x-glycerol (Fig. 1d). Although this sugar was previously identified in _D. melanogaster_ male accessory glands, it had not yet been

associated with a biological function37. Our 31P-NMR analysis of the MAG extracts indicated that a single male fly produces approximately 0.45 μg or 1.2 nmol of venerose. In a single

mating, the male transfers 39 ± 3.6% of its venerose pool to the female, after which it restores its venerose pool within approximately 24 h (Fig. 1e). GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASE IS REQUIRED FOR

VENEROSE PRODUCTION In a search for genes involved in venerose biosynthesis, we identified several mutants with transposons inserted in genes encoding enzymes involved in diacylglycerol

biosynthesis (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c). The MAG is rich in lipids and lipases38, and we found that RNAi-mediated knockdown of specific lipases in the MAG significantly reduced venerose

production (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Venerose carries a β-galactose attached to glycerol, a moiety commonly found in glycoglycerolipids. This suggests venerose production requires a

glycosyltransferase capable of transferring galactose or other hexoses to a lipid acceptor with a glycerol moiety (e.g., diacylglycerol). Thus, we searched the Carbohydrate-Active enZymes

(CAZy) database39,40 and found that the GT28 gene family has 1,2-diacylglycerol 3-β-galactosyl-transferase activity41 (Supplementary Data 1). The _D. melanogaster_ genome contains 18 genes

with a GT28 domain, 6 of which are expressed in the MAG (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Data 2 and Table 2). By performing MAG-specific RNAi knockdown, we found that knockdown of _UGT305A1_,

_UGT302C1_, _UGT304A1_, or _UGT37D1_ each significantly reduced venerose levels (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 3e). This result suggests these enzymes contribute with some redundancy to

venerose production. The MAG matures over 4–5 days after emergence42, and although the MAG contains minimal venerose at emergence, its venerose pool increases rapidly post-emergence

(Supplementary Fig. 3f). We found UGT305A1 expression in the MAG increases during this period (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Table 2). We also found overexpression of UGT305A1 in the MAG increased

venerose production by 33–40% compared to controls (Fig. 2c). _UGT305A1_ knockdown, however, did not significantly affect the size or shape of the MAG, nor did it affect its content of other

seminal substances such as SP (Supplementary Fig. 4). Therefore, in subsequent experiments, we used _UGT305A1_ knockdown males as venerose-deficient males. We analyzed single-nucleus

transcriptome data to examine the spatial expression patterns of genes involved in venerose biosynthesis, including GT28, lipase, and DAG metabolism genes43. We focused our analysis on the

male reproductive tract, where the _prd_ gene, from which the _Prd-F-Gal4_ transgene used to drive GT28 knockdown is derived, is predominantly expressed (Supplementary Fig. 4f). In contrast

to our bulk RNA-seq result showing significant expression of Ugt305A1 and related GT28 genes required for venerose synthesis (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Table 2), our single-nucleus RNA-seq

analysis did not identify any MAG cells expressing these genes. This is likely because the MAGs used in the single-cell RNA-seq analysis had low expression at the time of sampling (i.e.,

2–3-day-old males), as the expression of these genes increases transiently after eclosion. Although we did find that certain cell types, such as spermatocytes, produce a subset of these

genes, we were unable to identify a cell type that produces all the required venerose genes. This suggests venerose biosynthesis may require the cooperative action of cells derived not only

from the male reproductive tract but also from other metabolically relevant tissues (e.g., gut, fat body, etc.). FEMALES ABSORB VENEROSE FROM THE MALE EJACULATE _Drosophila_ females

incorporate phosphorus from the male ejaculate into both somatic tissues and developing oocytes22. Since venerose carrying its phosphoethanolamine moiety is highly abundant in the male

ejaculate, we hypothesized that females absorb phosphorus from the ejaculate via venerose. We radio-labeled venerose by feeding newly emerged males 32P-containing medium for 5 days. When we

did the same with _UGT305A1_ knockdown flies, we saw a roughly 40% reduction in venerose production and a corresponding 40% reduction in 32P radioactivity in the hydrophilic eluents of MAG

extracts, suggesting most 32P radioactivity in the MAG extracts originates from labeled venerose (Fig. 2d). In contrast, _UGT305A1_ knockdown did not affect the 32P activity of

venerose-deficient head extracts (Fig. 2e). When examined 24 h after mating, the ovaries of females mated with _UGT305A1_ knockdown males also had approximately 40% less 32P activity than

those of females mated with control males (Fig. 2f). These findings strongly suggest mated females absorb elemental phosphorus by metabolizing infused venerose. Furthermore, we detected

venerose in hemolymph collected from mated females, but not from virgin females (Fig. 2g, Supplementary Fig. 1c). Copulation in _D. melanogaster_ induces physical damage to the female

reproductive system, allowing components of the ejaculate to diffuse passively into the hemocoel44 and providing a plausible route by which venerose enters the female hemolymph. VENEROSE IS

ESSENTIAL FOR MATING-INDUCED GSC PROLIFERATION To assess the role of venerose in female reproduction, we examined egg-laying activity in females mated with venerose-deficient _UGT305A1_

knockdown males. In these females, cumulative egg-laying activity over a period of 7 days was reduced by 37–66% (Fig. 3a). Venerose deficiency in the male ejaculate did not, however, appear

to affect sperm fertility or offspring viability (Supplementary Fig. 5a–c). Females inseminated by venerose-deficient males began showing reduced egg-laying activity roughly three days

post-mating (Fig. 3a). It is therefore possible that venerose affects mating-induced germline stem cell (GSC) proliferation, then influencing egg production 2–3 days post-mating10. Females

mated with control males showed an increase in GSCs, whereas females mated with _UGT305A1_ knockdown venerose-deficient males showed reduced GSC proliferation (Fig. 3b, c). This impairment

was restored by injecting 0.8 nmol of synthetic venerose (Fig. 3d). Venerose injection into virgin females also stimulated GSC proliferation to the levels observed in mated females (Fig. 

3e). This effect appeared to be dependent on the amount of injected venerose, with amounts as low as 0.16 nmol inducing GSC proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 5d). This amount corresponds to

roughly 35% of the total venerose transmitted during mating (see Discussion). Mating-induced GSC proliferation is mediated by Decapentaplegic (Dpp), the fly counterpart of bone morphogenetic

protein (BMP)10,13,14,15,45,46. Venerose injection into virgin females increased phosphorylated Mad (pMad) in GSCs, indicating Dpp activity (Fig. 3f). VENEROSE STIMULATES GSC PROLIFERATION

VIA A BRAIN FACTOR Next, we asked whether venerose acts directly on the ovary to stimulate GSC proliferation. First, we isolated ovaries from virgin females and incubated them in culture

medium supplemented with or without venerose. As a positive control, we used 1 mM octopamine (OA) to stimulate GSC proliferation to the level observed in mated females14. Unlike with OA,

however, we found 10 mM venerose did not affect GSC numbers in cultured ovaries (Fig. 3g). We therefore formulated another hypothesis in which venerose acts indirectly via another tissue,

such as the brain or gut, by triggering the release of an external factor(s) that stimulates GSC proliferation10,15,47. Indeed, we found significantly more GSCs in ovaries co-cultured with

brains in medium supplemented with venerose, but not in medium without it (Fig. 3h). A similar co-culture with gut in venerose-containing medium, however, did not stimulate GSC proliferation

(Fig. 3h). These observations suggest venerose acts on the brain to induce the secretion of an endocrine factor that then stimulates GSC proliferation in the ovaries. DH44 ACTS ON THE

OVARIES TO TRIGGER GSC PROLIFERATION Dh44-R2, one of two GPCR receptors sensitive to Dh44, is expressed in terminal filament (TF) cells in larval ovaries48. We verified its expression in TFs

and discovered its expression in transition cells (TCs), which are TF cells that contact cap cells in the adult ovary (Fig. 4a–d, Supplementary Fig. 6a–d). TF cells, cap cells, and escort

cells comprise the GSC niche, which provides a physical anchor for GSCs and controls their maintenance and proliferation49,50. Dh44-R1, a paralogue of Dh44-R2, does not appear to be

expressed in GSC niche cells or other ovarian cells (Supplementary Fig. 6c). The expression of Dh44-R2 in GSC niche cells suggests that its ligand Dh44, which is secreted by the brain in

response to circulating venerose, may be involved in mating-induced GSC proliferation. We cultured virgin ovaries in medium containing varying concentrations of Dh44 and found that levels of

synthetic Dh44 as low as 10 nM stimulate GSC proliferation as much as 1 mM OA (Fig. 4e). Next, we wanted to investigate the role of TF cell Dh44-R2 in Dh44-induced GSC proliferation.

Although bab1-Gal4 is commonly used to target transgenes to TF cells, we realized it is also expressed outside the ovary, such as in cells of the brain and gut51. Thus, we compared the

expression of bab1-Gal4 and Dh44-R2 and found that their ovarian expression overlapped only in TF cells of the germarium (Supplementary Fig 6e–j). To avoid any compounding effect due to

unknown overlap of bab1-Gal4 and Dh44-R2 expression in other tissues, we performed ex vivo culture experiments using ovaries isolated from bab1-Gal4-induced _Dh44-R2_ knockdown and observed

a complete inhibition of Dh44-induced GSC proliferation (Fig. 4f). This suggests a direct mode of action for Dh44 on the ovary. Moreover, when we co-cultured _Dh44-R2_ knockdown ovaries with

brains in venerose-containing medium, they showed no obvious signs of GSC proliferation, unlike control ovaries (Fig. 4g). We were also able to corroborate these observations with in vivo

experiments using mated females. _Dh44-R2_ knockdown prevented the increase in GSC proliferation and pMad activity we observed in control females (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). In contrast,

_Dh44-R1_ deficiency had no effect on Dh44-induced GSC proliferation (Supplementary Fig. 7c, d). From these results, we conclude that after entering the female’s hemolymph from the male

ejaculate, venerose stimulates Dh44+ neurons in the brain to secrete Dh44. This Dh44 then acts on GSC niche cells expressing Dh44-R2 to promote GSC proliferation (Fig. 4a). VENEROSE

STIMULATES GSC PROLIFERATION VIA DH44-PI NEURONS Many brain neurons express Dh44, but the 6 endocrine Dh44-expressing Dh44-PI neurons in the _pars intercerebralis_ express the highest levels

of Dh4431. Dh44-PI neurons secrete Dh44 in response to hemolymph-born sugars35,36. We therefore hypothesized that Dh44-PI neurons may also secrete Dh44 in response to venerose, subsequently

stimulating GSC proliferation. When we injected venerose into _Dh44-RNAi_ virgin females whose Dh44-PI neurons no longer produce Dh44, they did not show the venerose-induced increase in

GSCs observed in controls (Fig. 4h). Next, we activated Dh44-PI neurons with the light-sensitive cation channel _CsChrimson_, which requires all-trans-retinal (ATR) for activation. After 24 

h of light exposure, females fed an ATR-containing diet but not those fed an ATR-free diet showed enhanced GSC proliferation (Fig. 4i). We also performed ex vivo culture experiments to

validate the necessity of Dh44 secreted by Dh44-PI neurons. Virgin ovaries co-cultured with control brains but not _Dh44_ knockdown brains showed a significant increase in GSCs in response

to venerose (Fig. 4j). VENEROSE STIMULATES DH44-PI NEURONS TO SECRETE DH44 Thus far, our results indicate that venerose enters the female hemolymph after mating. Because males transfer ~40%

of the contents of their MAG in a single mating session (Fig. 1e) and because MAG extracts from individual males contain ~1.2 nmol of venerose, we estimate that venerose levels could reach 6

 mM in the female hemolymph. Consistent with this estimate, we found that treatment of isolated brains with as low as 2 mM synthetic venerose induced a significant decrease in Dh44 protein

levels in Dh44-PI neurons. This indicates that venerose induces Dh44 secretion at physiologically relevant concentrations (Fig. 5a). To further examine the role venerose plays in Dh44

secretion, we asked whether venerose can trigger Ca2+ oscillations in Dh44-PI neurons expressing the Ca2+ reporter GCaMP6m. In brain preparations containing tetrodotoxin (TTX) to eliminate

any synaptic input on the Dh44-PI neurons, we found the addition of 2 mM synthetic venerose induced a Ca2+ response in ~40% of Dh44-PI (Fig. 5b–d). Venerose produced longer-lasting Ca2+

dynamics than glucose (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Movie 1), with an oscillation duration of 128 ± 45 s (for 2 mM). Notably, 2 mM venerose stimulated robust Ca2+ oscillations in Dh44-PI neurons

with a latency of 8.3 ± 1.4 min. In a copulation episode lasting ~15 min, ejaculate transfer is completed within 7–8 minutes of copulation initiation52. This suggests the Dh44-PI neurons

begin Dh44 secretion roughly by the end of copulation. VENEROSE STIMULATES DH44-PI NEURONS VIA TRET1-1 Dh44-PI neurons regulate post-ingestive nutrient selection, with Ca2+ oscillations in

response to nutritive D-glucose, but not to non-nutritive L-glucose35. Since the sugar transporter blocker phlorizin can suppress nutritive sugar-induced Ca2+ oscillations35, we reasoned

that sugar transporters in Dh44-PI critical for post-ingestive nutrient selection may also be important for responsiveness to venerose. After knocking down 23 _Drosophila_ sugar transporters

in Dh44-PI neurons, we found that knockdown of _trehalose transporter 1-1 (Tret 1-1)_ impaired D-glucose selection and reduced D-glucose-induced Ca2+ oscillations (Supplementary Fig. 8;

Fig. 5e). Furthermore, _Tret1-1_ knockdown significantly reduced venerose-induced Ca2+ oscillations, Dh44 secretion, and GSC proliferation (Fig. 5e–g). ENERGY-DEPRIVED FEMALES ABSORB MORE

VENEROSE Males transfer considerable amounts of venerose to females during mating. The elemental phosphorus females absorb from the male ejaculate is predominantly derived from venerose

(Fig. 2g). This suggests venerose transfer may function as a form of seminal feeding, akin to courtship feeding. To further explore this, we investigated the relationship between female

energy state and absorption of venerose. When mated with males producing 32P-labelled venerose, the ovaries of starved females exhibited higher 32P activity than their well-nourished

counterparts (Fig. 6a), indicating that energy-deprived conditions lead to increased female venerose absorption. As females can only absorb venerose while retaining the male ejaculate in

their uterus, energy states that enhance venerose absorption likely extend the EHP. ENERGY-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF VENEROSE ON EHP AND SPERM STORAGE Given the essential role of Dh44 from

Dh44-PI neurons in establishing the standard EHP ( ~90 min) and facilitating adequate sperm storage31, our finding that venerose stimulates Dh44 secretion suggests a potential regulatory

role for venerose in EHP and sperm storage dynamics. Dh44-PI neurons function as nutrient sensors, particularly during energy-deprived states36, indicating heightened responsiveness to

venerose under starved conditions. Starved females, when mated with control males, exhibited significantly longer EHP durations than their well-nourished counterparts (Fig. 6b). But pairings

with _UGT305A1_ knockdown males, which produce ~40% less venerose than control males, resulted in markedly shorter EHPs and reduced sperm storage (Fig. 6b, c). Importantly, this effect was

exclusive to starved females; we did not observe any notable effect in their well-nourished counterparts. These results suggest venerose transferred by males induces energy-deprived females,

but not well-nourished ones, to extend their EHP, leading to enhanced venerose absorption and sperm storage. ENERGY STATE DETERMINES DH44 POOL SIZE When we monitored Ca2+ oscillations in

Dh44-PI through a small window on the head capsule of live flies, well-nourished females produced spontaneous oscillations with larger amplitudes than starved females (Supplementary Fig. 

9a). Thus, well-nourished females secrete more Dh44 peptide, leaving less in the Dh44-PI neurons. We corroborated this finding when we observed a significant increase in anti-Dh44

immunoreactivity in Dh44-PI neurons under starvation conditions (Fig. 6d). Next, we further investigated the relationship between Dh44-PI activity, Dh44 pool, and EHP. Optogenetic inhibition

of Dh44-PI neurons before mating increased Dh44 peptide levels by 67 ± 21.3% and EHP by 24 min compared to controls (Fig. 6e), while thermal activation of Dh44-PI neurons reduced Dh44

peptide levels by 42 ± 9.6% and EHP by 56 minutes (Fig. 6f). These results suggest increased Dh44-PI activity and reduced Dh44 levels before mating reduce the EHP of female flies, whereas

decreased Dh44-PI activity and elevated Dh44 levels prolong the EHP. We observed a marked reduction in Dh44 peptide levels in mated females compared to virgins, regardless of their energy

state prior to mating (Supplementary Fig. 9b, c). This indicates that mating and venerose stimulate Dh44-PI neurons to secrete large amounts of Dh44. We infer from these results that the

energy state of females before mating determines the size of the Dh44 pool available for secretion triggered by mating or venerose (Fig. 6g). Under well-nourished conditions, Dh44-PI neurons

have a limited Dh44 pool because of their high level of spontaneous activity, probably induced by elevated hemolymph sugars. Conversely, under energy-deprived conditions, Dh44-PI neurons

possess a much larger Dh44 pool. Consequently, when mated with control males that transfer a substantial amount of venerose, energy-deprived females with larger Dh44 pools secrete more Dh44,

exhibit extended EHP, and absorb a greater amount of venerose compared to well-nourished females with limited Dh44 pools. FEMALES ASSESS THE ENERGY STATUS OF MALE PARTNERS VIA VENEROSE

Males under low-energy conditions produce and allocate less nutrients in their ejaculate53. We found that males starved for 24 h produced only half the venerose of well-nourished males (Fig.

 7a). In contrast to venerose, starvation had a limited effect on SP levels (Fig. 7b). This suggests a male’s energy state has a greater effect on seminal fluid venerose levels than SP

levels. Moreover, females mated with starved males exhibited no signs of mating-induced GSC proliferation (Fig. 7c). Last, since male energy status influences seminal fluid venerose levels,

we asked whether females adjust EHP and sperm storage in response to the energy state of their male partners. As anticipated, we found starved females mated with males starved for 24 h

exhibited an EHP 23 minutes shorter than those mated with well-nourished males and stored 19.4% less sperm (Fig. 7d, e). In contrast, well-nourished females did not exhibit any discernible

changes in EHP or sperm storage when exposed to the seminal fluid of starved males. Together, these findings provide insight into a mechanism by which females, particularly those

malnourished prior to mating, can discern males with distinct energy states by adjusting EHP and sperm storage (Fig. 7f). In energy-deprived conditions, females possess a larger Dh44 pool.

In this situation, as the quantity of venerose in seminal fluid increases, Dh44 secretion increases, leading to increased EHP and consequently enhanced sperm storage. Well-nourished females,

in contrast, have limited a Dh44 pool that is easily depleted by the smaller amounts of venerose transferred by starved males. For these females, Dh44 secretion cannot increase further in

response to the seminal fluid of well-nourished males, which leads to a resistance to changes in the EHP and sperm storage regardless of variations in the quantity of venerose transferred by

males. DISCUSSION VENEROSE IS A SIGNALING MOLECULE THAT ACTIVATES THE DH44 SYSTEM DURING MATING In this study, we identified venerose as a signaling molecule that stimulates Dh44-PI neurons

to release Dh44, which then affects GSC proliferation and modulates EHP and sperm storage. Multiple findings suggest venerose enters the female hemolymph and activates the Dh44 system

during mating. First, although venerose is normally produced exclusively in the MAG along with seminal fluid, it was detected in female hemolymph post-mating. Second, females mated to males

producing low venerose levels exhibited virgin-like GSC proliferation levels that were restored by venerose injection. Third, control virgins injected with venerose exhibited

mated-female-like GSC proliferation, but females with Dh44-PI neurons unable to produce Dh44 were unresponsive to venerose. Fourth, ovaries co-cultured with functional Dh44-PI neurons

increased GSC proliferation in response to venerose. Last, 2 mM venerose induced robust Ca2+ responses in an ex vivo calcium imaging preparation, leading to increased Dh44 secretion. Males

transfer roughly 40% of the venerose pool in the MAG (0.48 nmol) during mating and females have roughly 80 nl of hemolymph volume54. Thus, assuming a conservative 35% absorption rate, mating

could produce venerose levels in the female hemolymph of up to 2 mM. This aligns precisely with the estimates we gleaned from our venerose injection experiments. DH44 REGULATES GSC

PROLIFERATION AND EHP EXPANSION VIA DISTINCT GPCR PATHWAYS Our findings indicate that Dh44-R2, expressed in GSC niche TC and TF cells, is essential for stimulating GSC proliferation in

response to Dh44. In contrast to GSC proliferation, EHP is regulated by another Dh44 receptor, Dh44-R1 expressed in the CNS neurons. Thus, GSC proliferation and EHP expansion, which are

regulated by different Dh44 receptors, will be regulated by different levels of Dh44 and therefore venerose. Our data showed that females starved for 24 h absorbed almost twice as much

venerose as well-fed females. Thus, we expected starved females would secrete more Dh44, prolonging EHP and increasing GSC proliferation. Contrary to our expectations, we found that females

starved for 24 h before mating, despite exhibiting an EHP approximately 30 min longer, did not have higher GSC levels than well-fed females after mating with a well-nourished male (compare

the second column of Fig. 7c with the third column of Supplementary Fig. 10a). This is probably because GSC proliferation peaks at lower levels of venerose and lower levels of Dh44 than EHP

expansion. In addition, virgin females starved for 24 hours did not appear to show any noticeable difference in GSCs compared to their well-nourished counterparts (Supplementary Fig. 10a).

VENEROSE, A NON-PROTEIN SEMINAL SUBSTANCE THAT PROMOTES GSC PROLIFERATION Mating induces dramatic changes in female reproductive behavior and physiology, enhancing reproductive

output55,56,57. In fruit flies, many of these mating-induced changes are elicited by the seminal fluid protein SP. In contrast to SP, which acts through 20E, OA, and NPF originating from

peripheral organs, venerose operates through the Dh44 system within the brain. While OA and NPF signal through escort cells, Dh44 acts through TF cells, which have direct contact with cap

cells. Despite these factors acting through distinct GSC niche cells, they all seem to play essential roles in enhancing Dpp activity in the GSCs of mated females10,14,15 (and this study).

Furthermore, we found that synthetic venerose induces normal levels of GSC proliferation even in virgin females lacking _Oamb_, which encodes the OA receptor essential for OA-induced GSC

proliferation in mated females (Supplementary Fig. 10b). This suggests that either venerose or Dh44 acts independently of the OA signaling pathway. Thus, we postulate that mating-induced GSC

proliferation requires both venerose-induced TF and TC signals and SP- or OA-induced escort cell signals to converge on the niche cap cells that produce Dpp—the major niche-derived stemness

factor for GSC maintenance and proliferation. VENEROSE TRANSFER IS A FORM OF COURTSHIP FEEDING SIGNALING MALE QUALITY In _D. melanogaster_, males engage in seminal feeding, a form of

courtship feeding that allows females to incorporate male-derived phosphorus into their ovarian oocytes22. Until now, the specific source of the phosphorus acquired via seminal feeding

remained elusive. Using 32P-labeling experiments with _UGT305A1_ knockdown males, we argue that most of the phosphorus absorbed by females during a mating episode is derived from venerose.

Two findings support this claim. First, phosphorus NMR analysis of hydrophilic MAG extracts identified venerose as the single major source of phosphorus. Second, _UGT305A1_ knockdown reduced

total venerose in MAG extracts by approximately 40% (Fig. 2b). This roughly corresponds to the reduction in phosphorus-containing material in MAG extracts of _UGT305A1_ knockdown males, as

well as the reduction in phosphorus absorbed by females mated to _UGT305A_ knockdown males (Fig. 2d, f). Although these observations do not completely rule out the possibility that

_UGT305A1_ knockdown affects the production of other phosphorus-containing seminal substances, the hypothesis that venerose serves as a nutrient source for females to absorb elemental

phosphorus, a crucial nucleic acid component required for egg production, remains valid. Nevertheless, a comparison of phosphorus contained in a holidic medium58 for _D. melanogaster_ (6.8 

ng/nl) with phosphorus females obtain in a single mating episode ( ~5.2 ng) suggests females obtain most of their phosphorus from their diet, at least under laboratory conditions. In

general, courtship feeding conveys information about male attractiveness or quality, making it common for females to prefer gift-giving males24,25,59. There is also a clear link between

courtship feeding and post-mating sexual selection26,27. Venerose seems to influence two crucial aspects of female reproduction with significant implications for sexual selection: oogenesis

and sperm storage. Therefore, the transmission of venerose can be considered a manifestation of courtship feeding that effectively communicates male quality and enhances reproductive success

for the male donor. NUTRITIONAL STRESS ENHANCES ACCEPTANCE OF COURTSHIP FEEDING The energy-state dependent acceptance of courtship feeding and sexual selection has been reported in many

species28,60. For instance, in _D. subobscura_, where males regurgitate food to feed females during courtship, starved females show a preference for mating with food-giving males over

non-giving males, whereas well-nourished females do not discriminate24. Here, we revealed that starved _D. melanogaster_ females retained ejaculate containing larger amounts of venerose

longer in their uterus, absorbing more venerose and storing more sperm. Their well-nourished counterparts, however, did not exhibit as much retention of high-venerose ejaculate. Moreover,

this phenomenon did not occur when females were mated with males producing significantly lower levels of venerose due to starvation or _UGT305A1_ knockdown. THE DH44 SYSTEM COUPLES OOGENESIS

WITH ENERGY STATE For fruit flies in their natural habitat, feeding and mating are intimately associated, as mates encounter one another more frequently near patches of food61. Dh44-PI

neurons, serving as nutrient sensors, stimulate feeding through their downstream effectors35,36. Our finding that enhanced Dh44-PI activity also affects GSC proliferation suggests the Dh44

system links feeding and oogenesis. Thus, it is plausible that venerose-induced Dh44 secretion during mating could contribute to the increased appetite of mated females, along with their

increased GSC proliferation. This post-mating increase in feeding may, in turn, sustain increased GSC proliferation by further augmenting Dh44 secretion, even after venerose clearance. In

certain species, males transfer a spermatophore containing both spermatozoa and nourishment, which females often consume after the completion of spermatozoa transfer62,63,64. In other

species, males offer their own body parts as food for their mates19,20. Thus, the Dh44 system may also have evolved to enable females to regulate oogenesis in response to nuptial food gifts

provided before or after mating. A POTENTIAL IMPLICATION IN MAMMALIAN SYSTEMS Certain genes encoding the seminal fluid proteins of _D. melanogaster_ have undergone rapid evolution to the

extent that no detectable orthologs are present in other _Drosophila_ species65,66,67. Similarly, there is limited evidence supporting the existence of venerose outside of the _Drosophila_

genus. In contrast, the _Drosophila_ Dh44 peptide and its receptors exhibit sequence homology with the corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) peptide and its receptors in mammals, suggesting

conserved functions35,68. In mammals, CRH inhibits gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion in the hypothalamus, ultimately resulting in amenorrhea and infertility69,70. Unlike these

inhibitory functions on female reproduction in mammals, our findings here highlight the role of Dh44 in promoting female fruit fly reproduction. It is noteworthy that CRH expressed in the

uterus contributes to embryo implantation and the maintenance of early pregnancy in humans71. Epithelial cells are the main source of endometrial CRH in the nonpregnant uterus72. The

expression of the CRH gene in human endometrial cells can be induced by prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)73. Intriguingly, human seminal plasma contains PGs, especially PGE2, at levels up to 10,000

times higher than those observed in sites of chronic inflammation74. Thus, it is tempting to postulate that seminal plasma may also influence CRH expression in the female uterus via PGs.

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY In this study, we used _UGT305A1_ knockdown males as venerose-depleted males. Although we confirmed that _UGT305A1_ knockdown had no discernable effect on MAG

morphology or SP content, which correlate with MAG maturation and function42, it is still possible that _UGT305A1_ knockdown affects other sexually transmitted molecules in addition to

venerose. Nevertheless, the two main functions we ascribe to venerose, GSC proliferation and EHP expansion, are supported by highly compelling direct and indirect evidence. In the case of

GSC proliferation, we directly validated the effect of venerose with in vivo rescue experiments achieved via synthetic venerose injection and ex vivo ovary culture experiments with synthetic

venerose. For EHP expansion, which females exhibit roughly 90 min post-copulation, it was technically impossible to perform similar rescue experiments. This is because injecting venerose

into flies requires anesthesia, which requires several hours to recover before any behavioral testing. Nevertheless, the indirect evidence supporting our conclusion that venerose regulates

EHP expansion is compelling. In several in vitro and in vivo experiments, we established that synthetic venerose stimulates Dh44-PI neurons to secrete Dh44. There is also strong support in

the literature31 indicating that Dh44 secreted by Dh44-PI expands the EHP. Together, these points strongly suggest venerose regulates EHP expansion. We found Dh44-PI neurons exhibited

pronounced spontaneous activity with notable feeding state-dependent variation. Those of well-nourished females exhibited higher spontaneous activity than those of their starved

counterparts. Hemolymph sugars like trehalose and glucose evoke robust calcium responses in Dh44-PI neurons35, and well-nourished females exhibit higher blood sugar levels than starved

females75. From this, we inferred that the increased spontaneous activity of well-nourished females must be at least partially influenced by the sugars of the internal milieu. It is

important to note, however, that our data cannot prove a causal relationship between the spontaneous activity of Dh44-PI neurons and hemolymph sugar levels. Our evidence that

venerose-induced GSC proliferation requires Dh44 is very compelling. Dh44 can also stimulate GSC proliferation in the absence of venerose. For example, ovaries from virgin females showed GSC

proliferation in response to Dh44 in vitro (Fig. 4e) and in vivo (Fig. 4i). However, female reproductive organs, such as the uterus, seminal vesicles, and spermathecae, are in contact with

venerose in mated females. Thus, these tissues may be involved in signaling venerose reception and subsequent reproductive responses, including GSC proliferation. Future work will be

required to address whether and how venerose interacts directly with female reproductive organs. METHODS FLIES Flies were cultured on a standard diet (SD) containing dextrose, cornmeal, and

yeast at room temperature in a 12 h:12 ho light:dark cycle. All behavioural assays were performed at 25 °C in Zeitgeber time (ZT) 5:00-11:00. Virgin males and females were collected at

eclosion. Males were aged individually for 4–6 days; females were aged for 3–4 days in groups of 15–20. Starved flies were reared on 1% agar (Nacalai Tesque, 01056-15). All _Drosophila_

stocks used in this study are shown in the key resources table. To create the _Dh44-R1_ deficient allele (Dh44-R1−), two guide RNAs (5’-gacagctcgcggtaccctggcgg, 5’-acatgggtctcctgcatccaggg)

were inserted into pU6-BbsI-chiRNA plasmid (Addgene plasmid # 45946). This construct was then injected into M{vas-Cas9.S}ZH-2A (BDSC, 52669) to induce a defined microdeletion of 1261 bps

spanning from TM1 to TM5 of Dh44-R1. The presence of microdeletion was vertified by genomic DNA PCR using primers: 5’-aagctggcttgtttgcctaa and 5’-catccgacatttttccgact; (PCR product size:

control 2736 bps, mutant 1475 bps). UAS-Ugt305A1 was generated by amplifying a 1752 bps-long Ugt305A1 ORF with primers (5’-nnggtaccatgagggccttgtgtttact, 5’-nntctagattagtcttctttcttctcctcg)

from the _w__1118_ cDNA and cloning the KpnI-Ugt305A1-ORF-XbaI fragment into the SST13 vector. The resulting plasmid DNA was then injected into _w__1118_ flies with a specific landing site

on the second chromosome (VIE-72A) using the ΦC31 system. VENEROSE EXTRACTION To collect the male ejaculate for biochemical analysis, we used _Dh44-RNAi_ females, which expel a white

spermatophore-like sac made of semen and sperm shortly after mating31. The spermatophore-like sac or reproductive organs were homogenized in 10 µl of 0.1% formic acid. After spin-down

(15,262 x g, 4 °C, 10 minutes), the supernatant was filtered by Zip-Tip C18 (Sigma, ZTC18S096) to remove protein and other hydrophobic substances. For the comparison of venerose contents in

male reproductive tissues, dissected tissues of 10 males were collected and homogenized in 10 µl of 0.1% formic acid. After spin-down, 10 µl supernatant was mixed in 10 µl of 5.55 mM glucose

as an internal standard. For the relative quantification of venerose in hemolymph, 1 µl hemolymph was mixed in 5 µl of 0.1% formic acid and 1 µl of 2.68 mM 13C glucose as an internal

standard. Hemolymph was collected, using a modified method described previously76. 30–40 female flies were punched on the thorax with a tungsten needle and were collected in a small 0.5 ml

tube with a hole underneath. The small tube was then placed in 1.7 ml tubes and centrifuged (2649 x g, 4 °C, 5 min). To avoid contaminations from the male ejaculate that might remain in the

females, we collected hemolymph from females 4 hours after mating when sperm ejection was completed. MASS SPECTROMETRY AND NMR SPECTROSCOPY Mass spectrometric analyses were performed using a

high mass accuracy, high resolution mass spectrometer (Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) and a linear trap mass spectrometer (LTQ; Thermo Fisher,

Bremen, Germany) with a microspray ESI source operated in a full mass spectral acquisition mode for (+) and (−) MS scan in the mass range of m/z 100–500. The detailed MS parameter settings

are shown in Supplementary Table 3. All mass spectrometry data is shown in Supplementary Data 3. NMR Spectroscopy– 1H, 13C, 31P, and 2D-NMR experiments were performed using either a Varian

Unity INOVA 500 or a Varian VNMRS 600 MHz NMR spectrometer. MAG extract collected from 200 males was analyzed with the NMR Spectroscopy. The 31P-NMR signal intensities of MAG extract

collected from 200 males were compared with those of 1 mM Na3PO4 standard to estimate the venerose content in MAG extract from a single male. The NMR analyses are shown in Supplementary

Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2. CARBOHYDRATE-ACTIVE ENZYMES (CAZY) ANNOTATION To annotate proteins with the CAZy domain, the peptide sequences of _Drosophila melanogaster_ (BDGP6.32

assembly version, Ensembl database)77 were mapped with profile hidden _Markov_ models (HMM) of CAZy families, which were deposited at dbCAN, a CAZy domain HMM database39, through HMMER v3.3,

a homologs searching tool (hmmer.org) (e-values < 10-5) (See annotations in Supplementary Data 1). QUANTSEQ 3’ MRNA-SEQUENCING Total RNA was extracted from 50–75 MAG for each sample

using TRIZOL (Invitrogen, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The construction of library was performed using QuantSeq 3’ mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit (Lexogen, Inc., Austria)

according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, each 500 ng total RNA were prepared and an oligo-dT primer containing an Illumina-compatible sequence at its 5’ end was hybridized to

the RNA and reverse transcription was performed. After degradation of the RNA template, second strand synthesis was initiated by a random primer containing an Illumina-compatible linker

sequence at its 5’ end. The double-stranded library was purified by using magnetic beads to remove all reaction components. The library was amplified to add the complete adapter sequences

required for cluster generation. The finished library is purified from PCR components. High-throughput sequencing was performed as single-end 75 sequencing using NextSeq 500 (Illumina, Inc.,

USA). QauntSeq 3’ mRNA-Seq Library generation and NGS run ( >10 M read/sample) were performed by ebiogen Inc (Korea). Raw sequencing reads were mapped on the transcript sequence of

_Drosophila melanogaster_ (released version 6.42, FlyBase database)78 using _kallisto_ gene expression quantification program79 to generate count value and transcript per million base pair

(tpm) value for each transcript (see expression quantification table in Supplementary Data 2 and Table 2). 32P-LABELING AND LIQUID SCINTILLATION SPECTROMETRY For 32P-labeling, flies were

cultured with 32P-labeling medium containing 5% sucrose, 5% yeast extract, 1% agar, and 10 μci/ml of Phosphorus-32 Raidonuclide, Monopotassium phosphate (NEX060001MC, perkinelmer)80. 10–15

males were collected immediately after eclosion and kept in a vial with 32P-labeling medium. Five-day-old males were dissected in PBS, and male reproductive tissue including MAG and

ejaculatory duct from three males were collected and homogenized in 20 µl of 0.1% formic acid. After spin-down (15,262 x g, 4 °C, 10 min), the supernatant was filtered by Zip-Tip C18 (Sigma,

ZTC18S096) to remove protein and other hydrophobic substances in the same way as the venerose extraction protocol. The supernatant was mixed with 480 µl of PICO-FLUORTM 40, a universal

cocktail for solubilizing tissue samples. Heads of three males and ovaries of three mated females were collected in 20 µl of PBS, and mixed with 480 µl of PICO-FLUORTM 40 without additional

extraction steps. Disintegration per minute (DPM) values of solubilized samples or tissues were measured using a liquid scintillation counter, Hidex 300SI Super Low Level (HIDEX). SP

QUANTIFICATION A chemiluminescent Western protein analyzer, Protein Simple Abby (Bio-techne), was used to measure SP levels. Each sample was prepared by homogenizing the reproductive tracts

of 11 5-day-old males in 20 mL RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher, 89901) with protease inhibitors, adding 5X SDS loading buffer (Biosegment, SF2002), and heating at 98 oC for 5 minutes. Total

protein levels were analyzed by the Bradford assay, and each sample was diluted to 0.2 mg/ml. For SP quantification, we used EZ Standard Pack 5 (Bio-Techne, PS-ST05EZ-8), rabbit anti-SP

(1:400)81 as the primary antibody, and an anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1X; Bio-Techne, 042–206). We then performed the analysis with 2–40 kDa separation capillary cartridges (Bio-Techne,

SM-W012-01). For quantification of β-actin, lysates were analyzed with 12–230 kDa separating capillary cartridges (Bio-Techne, SM-W004-01) using EZ Standard Pack 1 (Bio-Techne, PS-ST01EZ-8),

mouse anti-β-actin (1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-47778) as a primary antibody, and an anti-mouse secondary antibody (1X; Bio-Techne, 042-205). To confirm the specificity of the

Western protein analysis for SP used in this study, we analyzed an SP-deficient mutant along with the appropriate controls (Supplementary Fig. 4d). EGG-LAYING ASSAY We followed a previously

described protocol11. Virgin _w__1118_ females were aged in groups for 3 days after eclosion, and virgin males were aged individually for 5 days after eclosion. For mating, virgin females

were paired individually with naïve males in 10-mm diameter chambers. Each female was allowed to lay eggs in SD vials for 7 days, and the number of eggs laid was counted every 24 h. SPERM

COMPETITION ANALYSIS We modified a method described previously in ref. 82. Virgin _cn bw_ females were aged in groups for 3 days after eclosion, and virgin males were aged individually for 5

days after eclosion. For defense assays, _cn bw_ females were individually mated with test males in SD vials for 2 h. After 3 days, the females were individually re-mated with _cn bw_ males

for 12 hours in the same vial and transferred to a new SD vial. For the offense assays, _cn bw_ females were mated with _cn bw_ males and 3 days later with test males. Paternity was

determined by allowing doubly mated females to lay eggs for 3 days and examining the eye color of the offspring. EGG-TO-PUPA VIABILITY ANALYSIS The mated females laid eggs in SD vials for 2

days, and the pupae that emerged were counted 5–6 days after egg laying. IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY To quantify the GSC number in germaria, ovaries were dissected in PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed for 20 

min at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Fixed samples were washed three times in 0.1% PBST and blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with 5% normal goat serum in 0.1% PBST

and then incubated with a primary antibody in blocking solution at 4 °C 24 to 48 h. Primary antibodies used in this study were mouse anti-Hts 1B1 [Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank

(DSHB); 1:50], rat anti–E-cadherin DCAD2 (DSHB; 1:50), chicken anti-GFP (Abcam; 1:8000), mouse anti-Lamin-C LC28.26 (DSHB; 1:50), guinea-pig anti-tj (1:5000)83, and rabbit anti-pMad (Abcam;

1:1000). After washing, fluorophore (Alexa Fluor 488, 568, or 633)–conjugated secondary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used at a 1:200 dilution, and samples were incubated for 2

to 3 h at room temperature in 0.1% PBST. All samples were mounted with Vectashield. GSC numbers were determined on the basis of morphology and positioning of their anteriorly anchored

spherical spectrosomes84. For GSC number quantification, germaria for each experimental condition were derived from 15 to 20 females. To examine GFP expression, ovaries, brains, and guts

were dissected in PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at room temperature. After washing and blocking, the brains were incubated with rabbit anti-GFP antibody

(1:1000; Invitrogen, A11122) for 24 h at 4 °C and with Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1:1000; Invitrogen, A11008) and with Alexa 555 phalloidin (1:1000; Invitrogen, A34055) for 48 h

at 4 °C. To measure the intensity of Dh44, brains were dissected in PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed for 30 min at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. After washing and blocking, the

brains were incubated in primary antibody for 24 hours at 4 °C, and in secondary antibody for 24 h at 4 °C. The antibodies used were: rabbit anti-Dh44 (1:2000)85 and Alexa 488-conjugated

goat anti-rabbit (1:1000; Invitrogen, A11008). To quantify venerose-induced Dh44 secretion, the dissected brains were incubated with 100 µl of sugar-free adult hemolymph-like Ringer’s saline

(108 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 8.2 mM MgCl2, 4 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 5 mM HEPES)86 with or without synthetic venerose for 30 minutes before fixation and anti-Dh44 staining. Tissues

were mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, H-1000). Images were acquired with an LSM 700/Axiovert 200 M using a 40x lens (Zeiss) and processed in Image J87. For each sample, 15

confocal images of 5 µm thickness were captured to produce a Z-stacked image with averaged intensity. SYNTHETIC VENEROSE 1-_O_-[4-_O_-(2-aminoethylphosphate)-β-D-galactopyranosyl]-x-glycerol

in a R and S isomer mix was custom synthesized by WuXi AppTec Co (China). Purity and yield of the synthetic scheme was shown in Supplementary Table 4. INJECTION Virgin females were aged in

SD vials for 3 days. 0.1–0.8 nmol of venerose in 23 nl of sugar-free adult hemolymph-like Ringer’s saline was injected into the abdomen of ice-anesthetized flies with a Nanoject II

microinjector (Drummond). After injection, the flies were kept in SD vials until assay. For GSC number quantification, venerose was injected 24 hours before dissection. EX VIVO ORGAN CULTURE

We modified a previously described protocol14. Virgin females were aged in groups for 3 days after eclosion. Organs were isolated in fly saline. Five pairs of ovaries were cultured in 1.5 

ml tubes containing Schneider’s _Drosophila_ medium (SDM) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin with the addition of 1–10 mM venerose, 1 mM octopamine, or

1–10 nM Dh44. For co-culture experiments, five pairs of ovaries were co-cultured with five brains or five whole guts (including foregut, midgut, and hindgut but not the crop). Cultures were

incubated at room temperature for 24 hours, and then samples were immunostained to quantify GSC numbers. CALCIUM IMAGING For ex vivo live calcium imaging, 4–5-day-old virgin females carrying

_P__Dh44__-Gal4_ and _UAS-GCaMP6.0_ _m_ were dissected under sugar-free adult hemolymph-like Ringer’s saline. The brain was mounted on a cover slide with a 40 µl drop of saline bath

containing 0.5 µM TTX and observed with a confocal microscope LSM 700/Axiovert 200 M with a 20x lens (Zeiss). The brain was recorded under GFP excitation light (470 nm) for a duration of 150

frames at 1 frame per 2 seconds. Subsequently, 10 µl of D-glucose or venerose in saline was added and the recording was resumed for an additional 750 frames. Image analyses and processing

were performed using Image J and OriginPro9.1. _F__0_ was calculated by averaging fluorescence values from 10 consecutive frames that showed baseline levels of GCaMP fluorescence. Ca2+

transients were defined as a peak reaching >50% of their maximum _∆F/F__0_ within a 10-frame-window. % Responders is the proportion of cells showing more than one Ca2+ transient. Max.

peak amplitude was the defined as the maximum value of _∆F/F__0_. The oscillation number was the number of Ca2+ transients observed for each cell. The oscillation duration was calculated

from the Ca2+ oscillation or peak with the maximum peak intensity in each cell and defined as the time interval between 50% of the rising phase and 50% of the decaying phase to the peak

_∆F/F__0_. The area under the curve was calculated by integrating _∆F/F__0_ values over baseline after D-glucose or venerose application. Activity onset latency was defined as the time point

when the first Ca2+ transient reached 50% of its peak _∆F/F__0_ in each cell. Cells that showed a strong baseline increase ( > 50% _∆F_) without a Ca2+ transient during the total

recording period were excluded from the dataset (_n_ = 226/514). For in vivo live calcium imaging, a cold anesthetized virgin female carrying _P__Dh44__-Gal4_ and _UAS-GCaMP6.0_ _m_ was

fixed on a metal plate with light-curing instant adhesive (ThreeBond, TB1773E). A piece of fly head cuticle was cut and removed using the blade of a disposable needle (Kovax, 25 G 5/8”)

under sugar-free adult hemolymph-like Ringer’s saline86. The brain was observed with an Axio Examiner A1 (Zeiss) equipped with a 40x water immersion lens (Zeiss, 421767-9970), a LucaEM R 604

camera (ANDOR technology, DL-00419), and an LED light source (CoolLED, 244–1400). During recording, the brain was bathed in sugar-free adult hemolymph-like Ringer’s saline. To normalize the

fluorescent value for each fly, Dh44-PI neurons expressing both the Ca2+ indicator GCaMP6.0 m and the nucleus-targeted red fluorescent protein RedStinger were recorded under RFP excitation

light (565 nm) for 60 frames (one frame per second) and then for an additional 100 frames under GFP excitation light (470 nm). The normalized relative fluorescence was calculated as (Fgi-

Fbi)/Fr, where Fgi represents GCaMP fluorescence of a cell body ROI (i.e., Region of interest) in the ith frame, Fbi represents the GCaMP fluorescence value of a background ROI, and Fr

represents the mean RFP fluorescence value of the first 60 frames. To calculate the area under the curve, the relative fluorescence values from all 5–6 visible cells in a brain preparation

were averaged, integrated over 100 frames, and then normalized with the mean of the data from the fed group (_n_ = 5). Image analyses and processing were done with Metamorph (Molecular

Devices) and Exel (Microsoft). TWO-CHOICE PREFERENCE ASSAY We used a method described previously in ref. 88. Briefly, approximately 40 male flies 4–8 days old were starved for 18–22 h and

then given a choice between 200 mM D-glucose (Sigma, 49139) and 200 mM L-glucose (Carbosynth, MG05247), each color-coded with tasteless food dyes (McCormick), for 2 hours. Food preference

was scored as a percent preference index (% PI) as follows: %PI = ((# flies that ate food 1 + 0.5 * # flies ate both) – (# flies that ate food 2 + 0.5 * # flies that ate both)) / (total #

flies that ate). EJACULATE-HOLDING PERIOD (EHP) ANALYSIS For determining the EHP, which was defined as the period between the end of copulation and sperm ejection, virgin females were paired

individually with naïve males in 10-mm diameter chambers. Immediately after copulation concluded (usually within 30 minutes), males were removed, and females were videotaped with a digital

camcorder (SONY, DCR-SR47). EHP was normalized to yield ΔEHP by subtracting by the mean of the reference EHP. We assayed EHP in the absence of food because Dh44-PI neurons regulate

feeding35, and therefore mating-induced Dh44-PI activation (see main text) likely stimulates feeding activity. If females access food, it is possible for an interaction between Dh44-PI

neurons and feeding activity to elongate the EHP. SPERM STORAGE ANALYSIS Virgin females mated with naïve _protamine-GFP_ males, the sperm heads of which express GFP, were frozen by

transferring them to −80 °C. Then, the seminal receptacles of females 6 hours post-mating were dissected in PBS and the number of sperm was manually counted using a fluorescence microscope

(Olympus IX71). OPTOGENETIC SILENCING AND ACTIVATING EXPERIMENTS For optogenetic silencing with GtACR1, freshly eclosed females were fed SD containing 1 mM all-_trans_-retinal (ATR) (Sigma,

R2500) in constant darkness for 2–3 days. The flies then were exposed to light from a blue LED (460 nm, 24 μW/mm2) for 18 hours prior to behavioral analysis. For optogenetic activation with

CsCrimson, we used a custom-made light-activation chamber with a multi-channel WS2812 NeoPixel LED (Adafruit) light. The flies were exposed to light from a red LED (620–630 nm, 20 μW/mm2)

for 24 hours prior to the GSC counting assay. THERMAL ACTIVATION EXPERIMENTS For thermal activation with dTrpA1, freshly eclosed females were stored in SD vials for 1 day at 20 °C and then

transferred to 20 °C or 30 °C for 2 days prior to behavioral analysis. SINGLE-NUCLEUS RNA TRANSCRIPTOME ANALYSIS The snRNA-seq datasets and cell type metadata for testis and male

reproductive glands were obtained from the Fly Cell Atlas (flycellatlas.org). The loom files (s_fca_biohub_testis_10x_ss2.loom, s_fca_biohub_male_reproductive_glands_10x_ss2.loom) were

downloaded and converted into Seurat objects. These Seurat objects were then normalized and scaled according to the Seurat pipeline89. STATISTICS AND REPRODUCIBILITY Experimental flies and

genetic controls were tested under the same conditions, and data were collected from at least two independent experiments. For behavioral assays, sample size was determined by previous

studies11,14,31,35,82,88. All flies were collected randomly from the same population. Age-matched flies were used for all experiments. To reduce bias, the data were measured by multiple

investigators without any information about experimental conditions. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Software version 8.00 (GraphPad Software) or Stata 17

(StataCorp. 2021). For one-way ANOVA, the Bonferroni post-hoc analysis was used if at least 50% of the comparison groups passed the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. Kruskal-Wallis tests with

Dunn post-hoc analyses were used otherwise. Two-way ANOVA was used if at least 50% of the comparison groups passed the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. Robust ANOVA was used otherwise. For

comparisons between two groups, unpaired _t_-tests were used if at least 50% of the comparison groups passed the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. Mann-Whitney tests were used otherwise. The

exact _p_-values and statistical methods used are shown in the figure legends and in Supplementary Data 4. REPORTING SUMMARY Further information on research design is available in the Nature

Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article. DATA AVAILABILITY The RNA-seq data from male reproductive glands have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession

code PRJNA1140569. All data presented in figures and mass spectrometry data generated in this study are provided in Source Data files and Supplementary Data 4, respectively. Source data are

provided with this paper. CODE AVAILABILITY The codes used for the data analysis for QuantSeq 3’ mRNA-seq and snRNA-seq have been deposited in Zenodo

(https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13643789). REFERENCES * Robertson, S. A. & Sharkey, D. J. Seminal fluid and fertility in women. _Fertil. Steril._ 106, 511–519 (2016). Article  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Samanta, L., Parida, R., Dias, T. R. & Agarwal, A. The enigmatic seminal plasma: a proteomics insight from ejaculation to fertilization. _Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol._ 16,

41 (2018). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Poiani, A. Complexity of seminal fluid: a review. _Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol._ 60, 289–310 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  *

Gonzales, G. F. & Villena, A. True corrected seminal fructose level: a better marker of the function of seminal vesicles in infertile men. _Int J. Androl._ 24, 255–260 (2001). Article 

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Avila, F. W., Sirot, L. K., LaFlamme, B. A., Rubinstein, C. D. & Wolfner, M. F. Insect Seminal Fluid Proteins: Identification and Function. _Annu. Rev.

Entomol._ 56, 21–40 (2011). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wigby, S. et al. The _Drosophila_ seminal proteome and its role in postcopulatory sexual selection.

_Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B_ 375, 20200072 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chen, P. S. et al. A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female D.

melanogaster. _Cell_ 54, 291–298 (1988). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kubli, E. Sex-peptides: seminal peptides of the Drosophila male. _Cell. Mol. Life Sci. (CMLS)_ 60, 1689–1704

(2003). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Delbare, S. Y. N. et al. Time series transcriptome analysis implicates the circadian clock in the _Drosophila melanogaster_ female’s response

to sex peptide. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA._ 120, e2214883120 (2023). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ameku, T. & Niwa, R. Mating-Induced Increase in Germline

Stem Cells via the Neuroendocrine System in Female Drosophila. _PLoS Genet._ 12, e1006123 (2016). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhang, C., Kim, A. J., Rivera-Perez, C.,

Noriega, F. G. & Kim, Y.-J. The insect somatostatin pathway gates vitellogenesis progression during reproductive maturation and the post-mating response. _Nat. Commun._ 13, 969 (2022).

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kim, Y.-J. & Zhang, C. Neuronal Mechanisms that Regulate Vitellogenesis in the Fruit Fly. _Korean J. Appl. Entomol._ 61,

109–115 (2022). Google Scholar  * Xie, T. & Spradling, A. C. A Niche Maintaining Germ Line Stem Cells in the _Drosophila_ Ovary. _Science_ 290, 328–330 (2000). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed

  Google Scholar  * Yoshinari, Y. et al. Neuronal octopamine signaling regulates mating-induced germline stem cell increase in female Drosophila melanogaster. _eLife_ 9, e57101 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ameku, T. et al. Midgut-derived neuropeptide F controls germline stem cell proliferation in a mating-dependent manner. _PLoS Biol._

16, e2005004 (2018). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Steele, R. H. Courtship feeding in Drosophila subobscura. I. The nutritional significance of courtship feeding. _Anim.

Behav._ 34, 1087–1098 (1986). Article  Google Scholar  * Lack, D. Courtship Feeding in Birds. _Auk_ 57, 169–178 (1940). Article  Google Scholar  * Alley, T. R., Brubaker, L. W. & Fox,

O. M. Courtship Feeding in Humans?: The Effects of Feeding versus Providing Food on Perceived Attraction and Intimacy. _Hum. Nat._ 24, 430–443 (2013). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Brown, W. D. & Barry, K. L. Sexual cannibalism increases male material investment in offspring: quantifying terminal reproductive effort in a praying mantis. _Proc. R. Soc. B._ 283,

20160656 (2016). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Neumann, R. & Schneider, J. M. Males sacrifice their legs to pacify aggressive females in a sexually cannibalistic

spider. _Anim. Behav._ 159, 59–67 (2020). Article  Google Scholar  * Chapman, T. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. _Heredity_ 87, 511–521 (2001). Article  CAS  PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Markow, T. A., Coppola, A. & Watts, T. D. How _Drosophila_ males make eggs: it is elemental. _Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B_ 268, 1527–1532 (2001). Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  * Kamimura, Y., Yoshizawa, K., Lienhard, C., Ferreira, R. L. & Abe, J. Evolution of nuptial gifts and its coevolutionary dynamics with male-like persistence traits of females for

multiple mating. _BMC Ecol. Evol._ 21, 164 (2021). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Steele, R. H. Courtship feeding in Drosophila subobscura. II. Courtship feeding by males

influences female mate choice. _Anim. Behav._ 34, 1099–1108 (1986). Article  Google Scholar  * Sakaluk, S. K. Male Crickets Feed Females to Ensure Complete Sperm Transfer. _Science_ 223,

609–610 (1984). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Albo, M. J., Bilde, T. & Uhl, G. Sperm storage mediated by cryptic female choice for nuptial gifts. _Proc. R. Soc. B._ 280,

20131735 (2013). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Fedina, T. Y. Cryptic female choice during spermatophore transfer in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). _J.

Insect Physiol._ 53, 93–98 (2007). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Toft, S. & Albo, M. J. Optimal numbers of matings: the conditional balance between benefits and costs of mating

for females of a nuptial gift‐giving spider. _J. Evol. Biol._ 28, 457–467 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Eberhard, W. G. Evidence for Widespread Courtship During Copulation

in 131 Species of Insects and Spiders, and Implications for Cryptic Female Choice. _Evolution_ 48, 711 (1994). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lüpold, S. et al. Female mediation of

competitive fertilization success in _Drosophila melanogaster_. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA._ 110, 10693–10698 (2013). Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Lee, K.-M. et

al. A Neuronal Pathway that Controls Sperm Ejection and Storage in Female Drosophila. _Curr. Biol._ 25, 790–797 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Davies, N. B. Polyandry,

cloaca-pecking and sperm competition in dunnocks. _Nature_ 302, 334–336 (1983). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Pizzari, T. & Birkhead, T. R. Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant

males. _Nature_ 405, 787–789 (2000). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Snook, R. R. & Hosken, D. J. Sperm death and dumping in Drosophila. _Nature_ 428, 939–941 (2004).

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Dus, M. et al. Nutrient Sensor in the Brain Directs the Action of the Brain-Gut Axis in Drosophila. _Neuron_ 87, 139–151 (2015). Article  CAS 

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Oh, Y. et al. Periphery signals generated by Piezo-mediated stomach stretch and Neuromedin-mediated glucose load regulate the Drosophila brain

nutrient sensor. _Neuron_ 109, 1979–1995.e6 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Chen, P. S., Fales, H. M., Levenbook, L., Sokoloski, E. A. & Yeh, H. J. C.

Isolation and characterization of a unique galactoside from male Drosophila melanogaster. _Biochemistry_ 16, 4080–4085 (1977). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wainwright, S. M. et

al. _Drosophila_ Sex Peptide controls the assembly of lipid microcarriers in seminal fluid. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa._ 118, e2019622118 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Yin, Y. et al. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 40, W445–W451 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Drula, E. et al. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and literature. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 50, D571–D577 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Coutinho, P.

M., Deleury, E., Davies, G. J. & Henrissat, B. An Evolving Hierarchical Family Classification for Glycosyltransferases. _J. Mol. Biol._ 328, 307–317 (2003). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Ruhmann, H., Wensing, K. U., Neuhalfen, N., Specker, J.-H. & Fricke, C. Early reproductive success in _Drosophila_ males is dependent on maturity of the accessory gland.

_Behav. Ecol_. 27, 1859–1868 (2016). * Li, H. et al. Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. _Science_ 375, eabk2432 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed 

PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Mattei, A. L., Riccio, M. L., Avila, F. W. & Wolfner, M. F. Integrated 3D view of postmating responses by the _Drosophila melanogaster_ female

reproductive tract, obtained by micro-computed tomography scanning. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa._ 112, 8475–8480 (2015). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *

Spradling, A., Fuller, M. T., Braun, R. E. & Yoshida, S. Germline Stem Cells. _Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol._ 3, a002642–a002642 (2011). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Miscopein Saler, L. et al. The Bric-à-Brac BTB/POZ transcription factors are necessary in niche cells for germline stem cells establishment and homeostasis through control of

BMP/DPP signaling in the Drosophila melanogaster ovary. _PLoS Genet._ 16, e1009128 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * LaFever, L. & Drummond-Barbosa, D.

Direct Control of Germline Stem Cell Division and Cyst Growth by Neural Insulin in _Drosophila_. _Science_ 309, 1071–1073 (2005). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Slaidina, M.,

Banisch, T. U., Gupta, S. & Lehmann, R. A single-cell atlas of the developing _Drosophila_ ovary identifies follicle stem cell progenitors. _Genes Dev._ 34, 239–249 (2020). Article  CAS

  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Drummond-Barbosa, D. Local and Physiological Control of Germline Stem Cell Lineages in _Drosophila melanogaster_. _Genetics_ 213, 9–26 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Luo, L., Siah, C. K. & Cai, Y. Engrailed acts with Nejire to control _decapentaplegic_ expression in the _Drosophila_ ovarian stem

cell niche. _Development_ 144, 3224–3231 (2017). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Weaver, L. N., Ma, T. & Drummond-Barbosa, D. Analysis of Gal4 Expression Patterns in Adult

_Drosophila_ Females. _G3 Genes|Genomes|Genet._ 10, 4147–4158 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Tayler, T. D., Pacheco, D. A., Hergarden, A. C., Murthy, M. &

Anderson, D. J. A neuropeptide circuit that coordinates sperm transfer and copulation duration in _Drosophila_. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa._ 109, 20697–20702 (2012). Article  ADS  CAS 

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Macartney, E. L., Crean, A. J., Nakagawa, S. & Bonduriansky, R. Effects of nutrient limitation on sperm and seminal fluid: a systematic review

and meta‐analysis. _Biol. Rev._ 94, 1722–1739 (2019). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Folk, D. G., Han, C. & Bradley, T. J. Water acquisition and partitioning in _Drosophila

melanogaster_: effects of selection for desiccation-resistance. _J. Exp. Biol._ 204, 3323–3331 (2001). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Serguera, C., Triaca, V., Kelly-Barrett, J.,

Banchaabouchi, M. A. & Minichiello, L. Increased dopamine after mating impairs olfaction and prevents odor interference with pregnancy. _Nat. Neurosci._ 11, 949–956 (2008). Article  CAS

  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Kocher, S. D., Tarpy, D. R. & Grozinger, C. M. The effects of mating and instrumental insemination on queen honey bee flight behaviour and gene expression.

_Insect Mol. Biol._ 19, 153–162 (2010). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Liu, P.-C. & Hao, D.-J. Behavioural and transcriptional changes in post-mating females of an egg

parasitoid wasp species. _R. Soc. open sci._ 6, 181453 (2019). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Piper, M. D. W. et al. A holidic medium for Drosophila

melanogaster. _Nat. Methods_ 11, 100–105 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tryjanowski, P. & Hromada, M. Do males of the great grey shrike, Lanius excubitor, trade food for

extrapair copulations? _Anim. Behav._ 69, 529–533 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Salzer, D. W. & Larkin, G. J. Impact of courtship feeding on clutch and third-egg size in

glaucous-winged gulls. _Anim. Behav._ 39, 1149–1162 (1990). Article  Google Scholar  * Reaume, C. J. & Sokolowski, M. B. The nature of Drosophila melanogaster. _Curr. Biol._ 16,

R623–R628 (2006). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wedell, N. Spermatophore Size in Bushcrickets: Comparative Evidence for Nuptial Gifts as a Sperm Protection Device. _Evolution_ 47,

1203 (1993). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Voight, J. R. Differences in Spermatophore Availability Among Octopodid Species (Cephalopoda: Octopoda). _Malacologia_ 51, 143–153 (2009).

Article  Google Scholar  * Scolari, F. et al. The Spermatophore in Glossina morsitans morsitans: Insights into Male Contributions to Reproduction. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 20334 (2016). Article  ADS 

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Swanson, W. J., Clark, A. G., Waldrip-Dail, H. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Aquadro, C. F. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving

male reproductive proteins in _Drosophila_. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA._ 98, 7375–7379 (2001). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Haerty, W. et al. Evolution in the

Fast Lane: Rapidly Evolving Sex-Related Genes in Drosophila. _Genetics_ 177, 1321–1335 (2007). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Findlay, G. D., Yi, X., MacCoss, M. J.

& Swanson, W. J. Proteomics Reveals Novel Drosophila Seminal Fluid Proteins Transferred at Mating. _PLoS Biol._ 6, e178 (2008). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *

Okamoto, S. et al. Activation of AMPK-Regulated CRH Neurons in the PVH is Sufficient and Necessary to Induce Dietary Preference for Carbohydrate over Fat. _Cell Rep._ 22, 706–721 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Breen, K. & Karsch, F. New insights regarding glucocorticoids, stress and gonadotropin suppression. _Front. Neuroendocrinol._ 27, 233–245 (2006).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fourman, L. T. & Fazeli, P. K. Neuroendocrine Causes of Amenorrhea—An Update. _J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab._ 100, 812–824 (2015). Article  CAS 

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kalantaridou, S. N. et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone, stress and human reproduction: an update. _J. Reprod. Immunol._ 85, 33–39 (2010).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Makrigiannakis, A. et al. The corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in normal and tumoral epithelial cells of human endometrium. _M_. (1995). * Dibbs,

K. I., Anteby, E., Mallon, M. A., Sadovsky, Y. & Adler, S. Transcriptional Regulation of Human Placental Corticotropin-Releasing Factor by Prostaglandins and Estradiol1. _Biol. Reprod._

57, 1285–1292 (1997). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Sales, K. J., Adefuye, A., Nicholson, L. & Katz, A. A. CCR5 expression is elevated in cervical cancer cells and is

up-regulated by seminal plasma. _MHR: Basic Sci. Reprod. Med._ 20, 1144–1157 (2014). CAS  Google Scholar  * Cao, H., Wiemerslage, L., Marttila, P. S. K., Williams, M. J. & Schiöth, H. B.

Bis‐(2‐ethylhexyl) Phthalate Increases Insulin Expression and Lipid Levels in _Drosophila melanogaster_. _Basic Clin. Pharma Tox_ 119, 309–316 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Haselton, A. T. & Fridell, Y.-W. C. Insulin Injection and Hemolymph Extraction to Measure Insulin Sensitivity in Adult Drosophila melanogaster. _J. Vis. Exp_. 52, e2772 (2011). * Yates,

A. D. et al. Ensembl 2020. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 48, D682–D688 (2019). * Gramates, L. S. et al. FlyBase: a guided tour of highlighted features. _Genetics_ 220, iyac035 (2022). Article  PubMed

  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 34, 525–527 (2016). Article

  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Lee, W. R., Sega, G. A. & Alford, C. F. Mutations produced by transmutation of phosphorus-32 to sulfur-32 within Drosophila DNA. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.

USA._ 58, 1472–1479 (1967). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Misra, S. & Wolfner, M. F. Drosophila seminal sex peptide associates with rival as well as own

sperm, providing SP function in polyandrous females. _eLife_ 9, e58322 (2020). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Immarigeon, C. et al. Identification of a micropeptide

and multiple secondary cell genes that modulate _Drosophila_ male reproductive success. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA._ 118, e2001897118 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Hoshino, R., Sano, H., Yoshinari, Y., Nishimura, T. & Niwa, R. Circulating fructose regulates a germline stem cell increase via gustatory receptor–mediated gut hormone

secretion in mated _Drosophila_. _Sci. Adv._ 9, eadd5551 (2023). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Ables, E. T. & Drummond-Barbosa, D. The Steroid Hormone Ecdysone

Functions with Intrinsic Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Control Female Germline Stem Cells in Drosophila. _Cell Stem Cell_ 7, 581–592 (2010). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google

Scholar  * Cabrero, P. et al. The _Dh_ gene of _Drosophila melanogaster_ encodes a diuretic peptide that acts through cyclic AMP. _J. Exp. Biol._ 205, 3799–3807 (2002). Article  CAS  PubMed

  Google Scholar  * Croset, V., Schleyer, M., Arguello, J. R., Gerber, B. & Benton, R. A molecular and neuronal basis for amino acid sensing in the Drosophila larva. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 34871

(2016). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. _Nat. Methods_

9, 671–675 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Dus, M., Min, S., Keene, A. C., Lee, G. Y. & Suh, G. S. B. Taste-independent detection of the caloric content

of sugar in _Drosophila_. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA._ 108, 11644–11649 (2011). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hao, Y. et al. Dictionary learning for

integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 42, 293–304 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Drs. H.

I. Jung (Yonsei University) and S. J. Moon (Yonsei University) for advice on statistical analysis, Drs. M-R. Song (GIST) and Y. Jun (GIST) for insightful discussions, and K. Kim (GIST) for

the graphical illustrations. We also thank Dr. M. Dus (New York University), B. Park (GIST) and S-H. Kim (GIST) for excellent technical assistance. The term venerose was suggested by Dr.

Jennifer M. Widmer and Dr. Alexandre Widmer of Giez, Switzerland. This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKEN grant (# 22H00414) to R.N., the GIST

Research Institute (GRI) 2023 to Y-J.K., and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Basic Science Research Program grants (NRF-2018R1A2A1A05079359, NRF-2019R1A4A1029724,

NRF-2022M3E5E8081194, NRF-2022R1A2C3008091) supported by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning to Y-J.K. Stocks were obtained from the Korea _Drosophila_ Resource Center

(NRF-2022M3H9A1085169), the Bloomington _Drosophila_ Stock Center, and the Vienna _Drosophila_ Resource Center. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Seong-Jin

Kim, Kang-Min Lee. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * School of Life Sciences, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea Seong-Jin Kim, Kang-Min Lee, Taekyun

Yang, Ingyu Song, Minsik Yun, Chen Zhang, Jae-Il Kim, Sunjae Lee, Zee-Yong Park & Young-Joon Kim * School of Horticulture and Forestry, College of Bio and Medical Sciences, Mokpo

National University, Muan, 58554, Republic of Korea Si Hyung Park * Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8572, Japan Fumika Rai & Ryo

Hoshino * Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea Greg S. B. Suh * Life Science Center for Survival Dynamics,

Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance (TARA), University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan Ryusuke Niwa Authors * Seong-Jin Kim View author publications You can also search for

this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Kang-Min Lee View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Si Hyung Park View author publications You can also

search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Taekyun Yang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ingyu Song View author publications You

can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fumika Rai View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ryo Hoshino View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Minsik Yun View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Chen Zhang View

author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jae-Il Kim View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Sunjae Lee

View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Greg S. B. Suh View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *

Ryusuke Niwa View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Zee-Yong Park View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * Young-Joon Kim View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS Conceptualization: S-J.K., K-M.L., and Y-J.K.; Methodology:

S-J.K, K-M.L., S.H.P., J-I.K., S.L., and Z-Y.P.; Investigation: S-J.K., K-M.L., S.H.P., T.Y., I.S., F.R., R.H., M.Y., C.Z., and S.L.; Visualization: S-J.K.; Writing—original draft: S-J.K.,

K-M.L., Y-J.K.; Writing—review & editing: S-J.K., G.S.B.S., R.N., Y-J.K.; Funding Acquisition: R.N., Y-J.K.; Supervision: Y-J.K. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Young-Joon Kim.

ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. PEER REVIEW PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature Communications_ thanks Daisuke Yamamoto and the other,

anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with

regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION PEER REVIEW FILE DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY

FILES SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 1 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 2 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 3 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 4 SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 5 SUPPLEMENTARY MOVIE 1 REPORTING SUMMARY SOURCE DATA SOURCE DATA RIGHTS AND

PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing,

distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and

indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third

party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the

article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright

holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Kim, SJ., Lee, KM., Park, S.H.

_et al._ A sexually transmitted sugar orchestrates reproductive responses to nutritional stress. _Nat Commun_ 15, 8477 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52807-3 Download citation *

Received: 02 February 2024 * Accepted: 19 September 2024 * Published: 01 October 2024 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52807-3 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following

link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature

SharedIt content-sharing initiative