Electrochemical generation of liquid and solid sulfur on two-dimensional layered materials with distinct areal capacities

Electrochemical generation of liquid and solid sulfur on two-dimensional layered materials with distinct areal capacities

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT It has recently been shown that sulfur, a solid material in its elementary form S8, can stay in a supercooled state as liquid sulfur in an electrochemical cell. We establish that


this newly discovered state could have implications for lithium–sulfur batteries. Here, through in situ studies of electrochemical sulfur generation, we show that liquid (supercooled) and


solid elementary sulfur possess very different areal capacities over the same charging period. To control the physical state of sulfur, we studied its growth on two-dimensional layered


materials. We found that on the basal plane, only liquid sulfur accumulates; by contrast, at the edge sites, liquid sulfur accumulates if the thickness of the two-dimensional material is


small, whereas solid sulfur nucleates if the thickness is large (tens of nanometres). Correlating the sulfur states with their respective areal capacities, as well as controlling the growth


of sulfur on two-dimensional materials, could provide insights for the design of future lithium–sulfur batteries. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of


subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value


online-access subscription $29.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $259.00 per year only $21.58 per issue Learn more


Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS:


* Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS HIGH-ENTROPY SULFOSELENIDE AS NEGATIVE ELECTRODES WITH


FAST KINETICS AND HIGH STABILITY FOR SODIUM-ION BATTERIES Article Open access 30 April 2025 A NEAR DIMENSIONALLY INVARIABLE HIGH-CAPACITY POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL Article 12 December 2022


REALIZING HIGH-CAPACITY ALL-SOLID-STATE LITHIUM-SULFUR BATTERIES USING A LOW-DENSITY INORGANIC SOLID-STATE ELECTROLYTE Article Open access 05 April 2023 DATA AVAILABILITY The data that


support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. REFERENCES * Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A.,


Hardwick, L. J. & Tarascon, J.-M. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. _Nat. Mater._ 11, 19–29 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Seh, Z. W., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q. &


Cui, Y. Designing high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. _Chem. Soc. Rev._ 45, 5605–5634 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zheng, G. et al. Amphiphilic surface modification of hollow


carbon nanofibers for improved cycle life of lithium sulfur batteries. _Nano Lett._ 13, 1265–1270 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yao, H. et al. Improving lithium–sulphur batteries


through spatial control of sulphur species deposition on a hybrid electrode surface. _Nat. Commun._ 5, 3943 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, H. et al. High electrochemical


selectivity of edge versus terrace sites in two-dimensional layered MoS2 materials. _Nano Lett._ 14, 7138–7144 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Liu, N. et al. Direct electrochemical


generation of supercooled sulfur microdroplets well below their melting temperature. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 116, 201817286–201817770 (2019). Google Scholar  * Nelson, J. et al. In


operando X-ray diffraction and transmission X-ray microscopy of lithium sulfur batteries. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 134, 6337–6343 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhang, L., Sun, D., Feng,


J., Cairns, E. J. & Guo, J. Revealing the electrochemical charging mechanism of nanosized Li2S by in situ and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. _Nano Lett._ 17, 5084–5091 (2017).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhang, L. et al. The synergetic interaction between LiNO3 and lithium polysulfides for suppressing shuttle effect of lithium-sulfur batteries. _Energy Storage


Mater._ 11, 24–29 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Wu, Y. & Liu, N. Visualizing battery reactions and processes by using in situ and in operando microscopies. _Chem_ 4, 438–465


(2018). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Stephenson, T., Li, Z., Olsen, B. & Mitlin, D. Lithium ion battery applications of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanocomposites. _Energy Environ.


Sci._ 7, 209–231 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Ghazi, Z. A. et al. MoS2/Celgard separator as efficient polysulfide barrier for long‐life lithium–sulfur batteries. _Adv. Mater._ 29,


1606817 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Lei, T. et al. Multi‐functional layered WS2 nanosheets for enhancing the performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. _Adv. Energy Mater._ 7, 1601843


(2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Seh, Z. W. et al. Two-dimensional layered transition metal disulphides for effective encapsulation of high-capacity lithium sulphide cathodes. _Nat.


Commun._ 5, 5017 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Babu, G., Masurkar, N., Salem, Al. H. & Arava, L. M. R. Transition metal dichalcogenide atomic layers for lithium polysulfides


electrocatalysis. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 139, 171–178 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Zhang, Q. et al. Understanding the anchoring effect of two-dimensional layered materials for


lithium–sulfur batteries. _Nano Lett._ 15, 3780–3786 (2015). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, H. et al. Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium–sulfur battery


cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability. _Nano Lett._ 11, 2644–2647 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ji, L. et al. Graphene oxide as a sulfur immobilizer in high


performance lithium/sulfur cells. _J. Am. Chem. Soc._ 133, 18522–18525 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chen, H. et al. High‐quality graphene microflower design for high‐performance


Li–S and Al‐ion batteries. _Adv. Energy Mater._ 7, 1700051 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Su, D., Cortie, M. & Wang, G. Fabrication of N‐doped graphene–carbon nanotube hybrids from


Prussian blue for lithium–sulfur batteries. _Adv. Energy Mater._ 7, 1602014 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Choi, S. et al. WO3 nanolayer coated 3D-graphene/sulfur composites for high


performance lithium/sulfur batteries. _J. Mater. Chem. A_ 7, 4596–4603 (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sun, J. et al. Entrapment of polysulfides by a black-phosphorus-modified


separator for lithium-sulfur batteries. _Adv. Mater._ 28, 9797–9803 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Nims, C., Cron, B., Wetherington, M., Macalady, J. & Cosmidis, J. Low


frequency Raman spectroscopy for micron-scale and in vivo characterization of elemental sulfur in microbial samples. _Sci. Rep._ 9, 1–12 (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Pascal, T. A.


et al. X-ray absorption spectra of dissolved polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries from first-principles. _J. Phys. Chem. Lett._ 5, 1547–1551 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *


Levin, B. D. A. et al. Characterization of sulfur and nanostructured sulfur battery cathodes in electron microscopy without sublimation artifacts. _Microsc. Microanal._ 23, 155–162 (2017).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kim, H. et al. In situ TEM observation of electrochemical lithiation of sulfur confined within inner cylindrical pores of carbon nanotubes. _Adv. Energy


Mater._ 5, 1501306 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Hamada, S., Nakazawa, Y. & Shirai, T. Nucleation in liquid sulfur droplets. _Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn._ 43, 3096–3101 (2006). Article 


Google Scholar  * Mugele, F. & Baret, J.-C. Electrowetting: from basics to applications. _J. Phys.: Condens. Matter_ 17, R705–R774 (2005). CAS  Google Scholar  * Pollack, M. G., Fair, R.


B. & Shenderov, A. D. Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. _Appl. Phys. Lett._ 77, 1725–1726 (2000). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yang,


Y., Zheng, G. & Cui, Y. A membrane-free lithium/polysulfide semi-liquid battery for large-scale energy storage. _Energy Environ. Sci._ 6, 1552–1558 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar 


* Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: Data Analysis for X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Using IFEFFIT. _J. Synchrotron Radiat._ 12, 537–541 (2005). Article  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. _J. Comput. Phys._ 117, 1–19 (1995). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sresht, V. et al. Quantitative


modeling of MoS2–solvent interfaces: predicting contact angles and exfoliation performance using molecular dynamics. _J. Phys. Chem. C._ 121, 9022–9031 (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar 


* Rajput, N. N. et al. Elucidating the solvation structure and dynamics of lithium polysulfides resulting from competitive salt and solvent interactions. _Chem. Mater._ 29, 3375–3379 (2017).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Merlet, C. et al. On the molecular origin of supercapacitance in nanoporous carbon electrodes. _Nat. Mater._ 11, 306–310 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar


  * Wang, Z., Yang, Y., Olmsted, D. L., Asta, M. & Laird, B. B. Evaluation of the constant potential method in simulating electric double-layer capacitors. _J. Chem. Phys._ 141, 184102


(2014). Article  Google Scholar  * Laturia, A., Van de Put, M. L. & Vandenberghe, W. G. Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from


monolayer to bulk. _npj 2D Mater. Appl._ 2, 4106 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We acknowledge support from the Department of Energy, Office of Basic


Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. Part of this work was performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF) and Stanford


Nanofabrication Facilities (SNF), supported by the National Science Foundation under award ECCS-1542152. R.A.V. acknowledges support from the National Academy of Sciences Ford Foundation


Fellowship and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NSF GRFP, grant number: DGE – 1656518). We acknowledge C. Su and J. Li from MIT for performing the DFT


calculations. A.Y. acknowledges D. Zakhidov for his assistance with polarized Raman measurements and Y. Ye, Z. Wang and R. Xu for helpful discussions. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * Di


Chen Present address: The Future Laboratory, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China * These authors contributed equally: Ankun Yang, Guangmin Zhou. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of


Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Ankun Yang, Guangmin Zhou, Rafael A. Vilá, Allen Pei, Xiaoyun Yu, Xueli Zheng, Chun-Lan Wu, Bofei Liu, Hao Chen, Yan


Xu, Di Chen, Yanxi Li & Yi Cui * Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Xian Kong & Jian Qin * Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford


University, Stanford, CA, USA Yecun Wu * Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA Sirine Fakra * Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University,


Stanford, CA, USA Harold Y. Hwang * Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Sciences, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, USA Harold Y. Hwang & Yi Cui * Department


of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Steven Chu * Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Steven Chu Authors * Ankun Yang View


author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Guangmin Zhou View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xian


Kong View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rafael A. Vilá View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google


Scholar * Allen Pei View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yecun Wu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed 


Google Scholar * Xiaoyun Yu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xueli Zheng View author publications You can also search for this author


inPubMed Google Scholar * Chun-Lan Wu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Bofei Liu View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Hao Chen View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yan Xu View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Di Chen View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yanxi Li View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Sirine Fakra View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Harold Y. Hwang View author publications You can also


search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Jian Qin View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Steven Chu View author publications You can


also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yi Cui View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS A.Y. and Y.C. conceived and


designed the experiments. A.Y. and G.Z. carried out device fabrication, imaging and electrochemical measurements. X.K. and J.Q. performed MD simulations. R.A.V. performed TEM


characterizations. A.P. performed COMSOL simulations. X.Z. and S.F. performed in situ XAS measurements. Y.W., C.-L.W. and B.L. assisted in material preparation. X.Y., H.C., Y.X., D.C. and


Y.L. assisted in electrochemical measurements. H.Y.H., S.C. and Y.C. supervised the project and all authors contributed to data discussions. A.Y. and Y.C. analysed the data and wrote the


paper with input from all authors. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Yi Cui. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


PEER REVIEW INFORMATION Nature Nanotechnology thanks Yuyan Shao, Guoxiu Wang and Reza Shahbazian-Yassar for their contribution to the peer review of this work. PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer


Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Figs. 1-21 and


Table 1. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 1 Sulfur generation on MoS2 shows distinct growth behaviors on the basal plane and the edges. Specifically, liquid sulfur droplets were generated on the basal


plane of the MoS2 while solid sulfur crystal was generated on the edges of the MoS2 flake. Play speed is 3× of the actual speed. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 2 Cryogenic electron microscopy (Cryo-EM)


Selected Area Electron Diffraction (SAED) of solid sulfur indicates its high crystallinity. The sample was tilted between -30° and 30°. Play speed is 5× of the actual speed. SUPPLEMENTARY


VIDEO 3 Liquid and solid sulfur generation on the edges of 2D flake. Liquid droplets were observed on the edges at the initial stage and quickly turned into solid by the emerging crystals


from the edges. Play speed is 5× of the actual speed. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 4 Sulfur generation on monolayer MoS2. Liquid droplets were dynamically generated on monolayer MoS2 without


crystallization. The MoS2 flake in the middle was not connected to the Ti electrode, so no sulfur was generated. Play speed is 20× of the actual speed. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 5 Liquid sulfur


generation on MoS2 window. The edges of the MoS2 flake were completely covered to suppress crystal growth. Play speed is 10× of the actual speed. SUPPLEMENTARY VIDEO 6 Solid sulfur


generation on MoS2 window. The edges of the MoS2 flake were partially left open to initiate crystal growth. Play speed is 10× of the actual speed. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and


permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Yang, A., Zhou, G., Kong, X. _et al._ Electrochemical generation of liquid and solid sulfur on two-dimensional layered materials with


distinct areal capacities. _Nat. Nanotechnol._ 15, 231–237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0624-6 Download citation * Received: 10 June 2019 * Accepted: 12 December 2019 *


Published: 27 January 2020 * Issue Date: March 2020 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0624-6 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this


content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative