ABSTRACT Periodontitis is associated with shifts in the balance of the subgingival microbiome. Many species that predominate in disease have not been isolated from healthy sites, raising

questions as to the origin of these putative pathogens. The study aim was to determine whether periodontal pathogens could be enriched from pooled saliva, plaque and tongue samples from

dentally-healthy adult volunteers using growth media that simulate nutritional aspects of the inflamed subgingival environment. The microbiome was characterised before and after enrichment

using established metagenomic approaches, and the data analysed bioinformatically to identify major functional changes. After three weeks, there was a shift from an inoculum in which

health-associated species. Sixty-four species were present after enrichment that were undetectable in the inoculum, including _Jonquetella anthropi_, _Desulfovibrio desulfuricans_ and

_Dialister invisus_. These studies support the Ecological Plaque Hypothesis, providing evidence that putative periodontopathogens are present in health at low levels, but changes to the

subgingival nutritional environment increase their competitiveness and drive deleterious changes to biofilm composition. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS MICROBIOME COMPOSITION AND

METABOLIC PATHWAYS IN SHALLOW AND DEEP PERIODONTAL POCKETS Article Open access 15 April 2025 SUSPENSION OF ORAL HYGIENE PRACTICES HIGHLIGHTS KEY BACTERIAL SHIFTS IN SALIVA, TONGUE, AND TOOTH

PLAQUE DURING GINGIVAL INFLAMMATION AND RESOLUTION Article Open access 25 March 2023 MECHANICAL BIOFILM DISRUPTION CAUSES MICROBIAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL SHIFTS IN PERIODONTITIS PATIENTS

Article Open access 07 May 2021 INTRODUCTION The mouth harbours a diverse and natural microbiota that persists on oral surfaces as structurally- and functionally-organised multi-species

biofilms that have a symbiotic relationship with the host1,2. The host provides a warm and nutritious habitat, while the resident oral microbiota delivers important health benefits (e.g.

pathogen exclusion, immune modulation, entero-salivary nitrate reduction cycle)3,4. A dynamic balance exists between the host and the oral microbiota, and substantial changes in the local

environment can drive deleterious shifts in the microbial composition of dental biofilms, and these can predispose a site to disease (dysbiosis). For example, the frequent intake of

fermentable dietary sugars and/or reductions in saliva flow result in dental biofilms experiencing extended periods of low pH. This selects for acidogenic/acid-tolerating species at the

expense of beneficial oral bacteria that preferentially grow at neutral pH5,6, and increases the risk of dental caries. In contrast, gingivitis and periodontitis are associated with an

inflammatory response to excessive biofilm accumulation around the gingival margin. This response can be de-regulated and subverted by some bacterial populations leading to a heightened

expression of pro- inflammatory molecules, and an increased flow of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF; a protein-rich serum-like exudate). Metagenomic studies have shown that the microbiome in

periodontal pockets is markedly different from that found in health, and contains high proportions of obligately anaerobic, often proteolytic taxa, some of which have yet to be grown in the

laboratory while other have yet to be named7,8,9. Although some periodontal pathogens have been detected on occasions, and at low levels, in samples from periodontally-healthy

individuals10,11,12, many of the organisms that have been more recently implicated in disease7 have only been detected at inflamed sites. The factors that drive the changes in the microbiota

in periodontal disease are not fully understood, and a number of theories have been postulated to explain the shift from a symbiotic to a dysbiotic relationship with the host. These

theories range from exogenous infection13, co-infection with viruses14, enrichment of minor species within the biofilm following changes to the local environment15 through to low abundance

keystone pathogens orchestrating commensal species to provoke a destructive inflammatory response16, but experimental evidence for these concepts is sparse. The aim of the present study was

to investigate whether any of the recently described putative periodontal pathogens7 could be enriched from biofilms taken from dentally-healthy young adult volunteers by growth under

nutritional conditions that reflect aspects of the subgingival environment found during inflammation. Samples of saliva, tongue and supragingival plaque from the volunteers were pooled to

increase the probability of including putative periodontal pathogens in the inoculum prior to enrichment. RESULTS Pooled oral bacterial samples from eight volunteers were subjected to

enrichment culture in two types of medium (protein-rich with or without supplementation with serum) for three weeks, and the microbial composition and potential functions were compared

between biofilms enriched on these different media and between the biofilms and the inoculum. Three independent enrichment cultures were performed under each set of nutritional conditions,

and the reproducibility of the resultant microbial communities can be gauged from the similarity of the profiles of the taxa in Fig. 1. On average, 22.4 million sequences were obtained per

sample (range 20.7–26 million). MEGAN was used for the analysis of taxonomy and functional potential content of our biofilm samples. Analysis of metagenomes showed that the sequence reads

represented 304 OTUs at species level and 4490 functionally annotated genes of bacterial origin (Supplementary Dataset and Table 1). Only 28–35.5% of reads were assigned a functional role.

MICROBIAL COMPOSITION OF THE INOCULUM At the phylum level, the inoculum (comprising pooled samples of tongue biofilm, supragingival molar plaque and saliva from healthy volunteers) was rich

in Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria, and contained high proportions of the following genera: _Streptococcus_, _Haemophilus_, _Veillonella_, _Neisseria_ and _Prevotella_ (Fig. 1

and Table 2). Predominant species included _Streptococcus sanguinis_, _Streptococcus salivarius_, _Streptococcus cristatus_ and _Haemophilus parainfluenzae_ (Fig. 2). In contrast, members of

genera associated with periodontal disease, such as _Porphyromona_s, _Filifactor_, _Tannerella_, and _Treponema_, were either not detected in the inoculum, or were present at very low

levels using shotgun metagenomics. At the species level, many of the taxa that have recently been implicated with periodontal disease7, including members of the ‘red complex’ (_Porphyromonas

gingivalis_, _Treponema denticola_, _Tannerella forsythia_), were detected in low abundance in the pooled inoculum at the start of the enrichment studies (see Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 1,

and Supplementary Fig. 2). DIVERSITY OF BIOFILMS FOLLOWING ENRICHMENT The number of species (alpha diversity) was significantly lower in cultured biofilms than in the inoculum (p < 0.05,

Kruskal-Wallis). There was a significant decline of unique species in biofilms but there were no differences in alpha diversity between enrichments performed in media with or without serum

(Supplementary Fig. 2). Shannon index revealed higher diversity and evenness of the inoculum compared with enriched biofilms, p < 0.05, with no significant differences between biofilm

samples, irrespective of the growth medium. Redundancy analysis revealed that samples were similar between experimental replicates and distinct between experimental comparison groups

(inoculum and biofilms cultured in two distinct media) (Fig. 4). COMPOSITION OF BIOFILMS FOLLOWING ENRICHMENT There was a shift in the distribution of phyla following enrichment and biofilm

growth. Biofilm samples had lower proportions of Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, TM7 and SR1 phyla than the inoculum, while there were increases in Bacteroidetes, Synergistetes and

Firmicutes following enrichment (Fig. 1). Bacteria associated with gingival health, especially those belonging to the genera _Streptococcus_, _Granulicatella_, _Rothia_, _Haemophilus_ and

_Veillonella_, decreased in relative abundance following enrichment and biofilm growth. Many species present in the inoculum, and which are associated with oral health, were not detected in

biofilms or showed a low relative abundance (Fig. 2). For example, _H_. _parainfluenzae_, and _Veillonella_ and several _Streptococcus_ spp. (e.g. _S_. _gordonii_, _S_. _oralis_, _S_.

_sanguinis_, _S_. _parasanguinis_) were prevalent in the inoculum but were not detected in biofilms following enrichment for three weeks. In contrast, 64 species were found in biofilms that

could not be detected in the inoculum (Supplementary Table 1). Many of these species are fastidious, and included _Jonquetella anthropi_, _Desulfovibrio desulfuricans_, _Dialister invisus_,

_Treponema maltophilum_ and _Prevotella marshii_. The nutrient status of the enrichment medium had an impact on the composition of the developing biofilms (Fig. 3, Table 1). Compared with

the inoculum, biofilms grown in a protein-rich medium lacking serum were enriched with Synergistetes, Spirochetes and Bacteroidetes, (p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis), whereas just higher

proportions of Bacteroidetes were found following growth with serum (Fig. 1). Biofilms were dominated by species associated with periodontal disease after growth in either medium (Fig. 3;

Table 1). Some putative pathogens were enriched preferentially in protein-rich medium (PRM) alone (e.g. _Fretibacterium fastidiosum_, _Prevotella marshii_) while others were enhanced in the

presence of serum (e.g. _Filifactor alocis_, _Pseudoramibacter alactolyticus_) (Fig. 3, Table 1, Supplementary Table 1). Some _Fusobacterium_ species (e.g. _F_. _periodonticum_) were more

abundant in biofilms cultured in protein-rich medium (Fig. 2). However, in general, the _Fusobacterium_ genus was most abundant in inoculum samples and was not favoured by culturing in

either medium, p > 0.05 (Table 2). The species that make up the ‘red complex’ showed differential responses to medium supplementation. _Tannerella forsythia_ was enriched by the

protein-rich medium irrespective of whether it was supplemented with serum, while _P_. _gingivalis_ and _T_. _denticola_ were more strongly favoured by PRM with serum or PRM alone,

respectively (Fig. 3). The responses of _P_. _gingivalis_ in the enrichment studies, as determined by the metagenomic approach, were confirmed by use of qPCR (Supplementary Fig. 3).

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF ENRICHED BIOFILMS The inoculum was over-represented with genes involved in di- and oligo-saccharide metabolism, such as sucrose, fructo-oligosaccharide and raffinose

utilization, lactose and galactose uptake, haem uptake in Gram-positive bacteria, oxidative stress, urea degradation or sialic acid metabolism (Supplementary Tables 2–4). In contrast,

biofilm samples following enrichment culture were over-represented with genes implicated in virulence (resistance to antibiotics, conjugative transposons, ABC transporters, multidrug

resistance efflux pumps), amino acid metabolism (including for branched amino acids), anaerobic respiratory reduction, and cobalamin synthesis and metabolism (Supplementary Dataset file).

Samples that were cultured in the medium with serum had more over-represented functional groups related to virulence and antibiotic resistance compared with biofilms cultured without serum.

DISCUSSION The oral microbiome exists as complex multi-species biofilms on oral surfaces, especially on teeth, and oral hygiene can maintain dental plaque at levels compatible with health.

Indeed, the oral microbiome has a symbiotic relationship with the host, and delivers important health benefits. However, this relationship can breakdown as a result of changes to the

composition and metabolism of the microbiota at a site. In periodontal disease, there are substantial increases in the proportions of obligately anaerobic and proteolytic bacteria, many of

which are Gram negative. The source of some of these bacteria is unclear, as many have not been detected at healthy sites, while the drivers of these dysbiotic changes in the microbiome are

not fully understood. In the healthy mouth, the microbial composition of oral biofilms can remain relatively stable over time, despite regular but minor perturbations to the

environment17,18. Although there are inter-subject variations in the microbiota, attempts have been made to define a core microbiome associated with oral health and, depending on the study

design, this includes representatives of the genera _Streptococcus_, _Veillonella_, _Granulicatella_, _Neisseria_, _Haemophilus_, _Corynebacterium_, _Rothia_, _Actinomyces_, _Prevotella_ and

_Fusobacterium_19,20,21. The inoculum for the enrichment studies described here was obtained by pooling samples from saliva, tongue and supragingival plaque from healthy volunteers. Samples

were pooled to increase the probability that some of the putative pathogens that have been associated with periodontal disease7 might be present in the inoculum. Many of these species have

not been reported in health and, therefore, may not have been present in a site-specific sample from a single individual. The in-depth characterisation of the inoculum using contemporary

metagenomic approaches confirmed that it was comprised of genera representative of the core oral microbiome listed above, and included many species associated with oral health such as _S_.

_oralis_, _S_. _sanguinis_, _S_. _gordonii_, _Granulicatella elegans_, _Neisseria flavescens_, and _Porphyromonas catoniae_. As described above, the symbiotic relationship between the host

and the oral microbiome can break down and disease can occur. The inflammatory response to plaque accumulation that occurs in periodontal disease ensures the rapid delivery of an array of

host defence factors to counter the microbial insult; however, GCF also contains proteins and glycoproteins that can be exploited as nutrients by many of the fastidious, proteolytic and

‘inflammophilic’ bacteria associated with these pro-inflammatory biofilms22. The source of these fastidious micro-organisms, some of which cannot be detected in health, and the drivers that

enable them to become predominant remain to be elucidated. One line of reasoning has been that changes to the subgingival environment associated with inflammation, especially in terms of

nutrient profile, select for micro-organisms most adapted to these altered conditions. Early studies showed that repeated enrichment of subgingival biofilms from patients with periodontitis

in human serum led to the eventual selection of _Bacteroides intermedius_ (now classified as _Prevotella intermedia_) from samples in which this species was not originally detected23.

Subsequent enrichment studies using continuous culture in the same serum-based medium generated consortia capable of degrading molecules involved in host defence (e.g. immunoglobulins,

complement, haptoglobin, transferrin, etc), and spirochaetes and obligately anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria predominated24. In these studies, however, the plaque samples used for the

inoculum were from moderately deep and untreated periodontal pockets, and neither the inoculum nor the resultant communities were grown as biofilms nor were characterised in detail. We,

therefore, used an inoculum comprising saliva, supragingival plaque and tongue scrapings from dentally-healthy young adults, and grew them on surfaces for three weeks, with regular changes

of the medium, and characterised the inoculum and enriched biofilms using contemporary metagenomic approaches. Previous studies had incubated saliva samples in the CBD for two weeks in a

proof-of-principal study to demonstrate the utility of this model to grow complex communities of oral bacteria25. We used a slightly longer incubation period to provide the maximum

opportunity for the enrichment of slow-growing and nutritionally-fastidious species to outcompete the health-associated bacteria that predominated in the inoculum taken from dentally-healthy

subjects. In our study, the culturing conditions reflected some aspects of an inflamed periodontal pocket, such as an anaerobic atmosphere and protein-rich environment, etc. Species that

benefited from this environment eventually outcompeted the facultatively anaerobic species that were abundant in the inoculum (e.g. _Streptococcus_ and _Neisseria_ species). When analysed at

the genus and species level, there were marked differences between the inoculum and the biofilms, and between the biofilms that were cultured with and without serum. Several species present

in the inoculum, and associated with health, were non-competitive during enrichment, and some were not detected after three weeks (e.g. _H_. _parainfluenzae_, _S_. _sanguinis_, _S_.

_gordonii_, _N_. _flavescens_). Other species thrived under the altered nutritional conditions, and their relative abundance increased markedly. Many of these species have been isolated from

inflamed periodontal pockets and are associated with tissue destruction, and included the bacteria known as the ‘red complex’ (_P_. _gingivalis_, _T_. _denticola_, _T_. _forsythia_). The

medium used for the enrichment experiment influenced the composition of the resultant microbial communities. Some species were more abundant in the absence of serum (e.g. _F_. _fastidiosum_,

_Anaeroglobus geminatus_, _P_. _marshii_ and _T_. _denticola_) while others (including _P_. _gingivalis_, _F. alocis_, _P_. _alactolyticus_ and _E_. _yurii_) benefited more from serum

supplementation, demonstrating that the enriched organisms could exploit a wide repertoire of proteins. It was noteworthy that 64 species detected in the biofilms following enrichment could

not be found in the inoculum, even when using a metagenomic approach. Many of these organisms have fastidious growth requirements (e.g. sulphate-reducing species, spirochaetes). As this was

a closed system, these findings demonstrate that these taxa were present in biofilms from healthy mouths, but must be non-competitive in their growth relative to health-associated species,

and were present below the level of detection. However, once environmental conditions were changed and became more favourable, then they were able to exploit the altered nutritional profile

and out-compete many species associated with health, and become predominant members of the community. Likewise, many species associated with oral health became non-detectable, or were

present in very low abundance, following enrichment culture. The application of metagenomics approaches to characterise the oral microbiome has resulted in a diverse collection of new or

previously unknown organisms being associated with periodontitis, although their precise roles in disease are unknown. A systematic review of 41 studies evaluated the strength of evidence

linking these newly identified pathogens with periodontitis7. In our study, seven of 17 taxa with ‘moderate evidence’ and three of 15 taxa with ‘some evidence’ for an association with

periodontitis, had a higher abundance in the enriched biofilms compared with the inoculum. Functional potential analysis showed clear differences between the inoculum and biofilms cultured

in media with or without serum. The inoculum was over-represented with genes responsible for carbohydrate metabolism, including di- and oligo-saccharide utilization, while the enriched

biofilms had an abundance of genes associated with proteolysis, methanogenesis, virulence, motility and chemotaxis (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). These findings are consistent with results

from functional studies of biofilms taken from healthy individuals and from patients with generalised chronic periodontitis8. These findings support the concepts behind the original

‘ecological plaque hypothesis’15,26 and the more recent ‘polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis’ model of periodontal disease27, in which the microbiota isolated from pockets gains an advantage

from the substrates derived from inflammation and tissue breakdown, and this drives community restructuring. Disease is a consequence of a dysbiotic shift in the microbiota driven by a

change in the local environment. Implicit in these concepts is that disease can be managed or prevented by interfering with the drivers of dysbiosis. When the inflammatory environment was

controlled in a _P_. _gingivalis_-induced model of periodontitis in rabbits using Resolvin E1, there was tissue regeneration and a decrease in Gram-negative anaerobic species28. In the

present study, samples of saliva and biofilm from teeth and tongue from healthy volunteers were pooled to create the inoculum. This was because we could not predict whether the enrichment

cultures would be successful, and we wanted to maximise the probability of detecting putative periodontal pathogens. Now we have succeeded in developing a model of ‘pathogen enrichment’,

this approach could be applied to individual samples of biofilm to see whether these organisms are present at all sites and in all individuals, or whether their distribution is highly

localised or they colonise only a subset of people. If the latter was the case then it might be possible to identify individuals at risk of periodontitis in advance of the development of

disease and focus remedial therapy on this group. MATERIALS AND METHODS SAMPLE COLLECTION Eight dentally-healthy volunteers (mean age 31 ± 8 y, 50% male: 50% female) provided samples of

supragingival buccal molar plaque, biofilm from the tongue dorsum and 5 ml of unstimulated saliva. Supragingival plaque and tongue biofilm samples were each collected using a sterile wooden

toothpick and a sterile wooden spatula, respectively, and placed into 3 mL sterile pre-reduced protein-rich medium and transferred to an anaerobic workstation (Don Whitley Scientific;

Shipley) together with the saliva samples within 60 minutes. Each sample was homogenised by vortexing for 60 seconds, and then pooled to obtain separate saliva, tongue and supragingival

plaque samples, and vortexed for an additional 60 seconds. Inclusion criteria were that participants routinely brushed their teeth twice daily, attended regular dental check-ups, and were

not undergoing any treatment for dental caries or periodontal disease, nor had been on antibiotics for at least three months or were having treatment for systemic disease. Moreover, as part

of the inclusion criteria, participants were asked to confirm that they were not undergoing dental treatment and did not have overt periodontitis or caries disease. ETHICS STATEMENT Informed

consent was obtained from all participants. Ethics approval was granted by the University of Leeds Dental Research Ethics Committee (020915/MN/175). All sample processing was carried out in

accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. ENRICHMENT CULTURES Enrichment cultures were performed using the Calgary Biofilm Device (CBD; Innovotech, Edmonton, Canada)29. This

device is a 96-well microtitre plate with a modified lid containing pegs that protrude into the growth medium in each well, enabling biofilm formation on the pegs. The hydroxyapatite-coated

pegs were preconditioned with 200 μL sterile human saliva30 from a single 28 year old healthy female donor. The sterility of saliva was checked by aerobic and anaerobic culture for 72 h.

Each well was filled with 91 μL pooled saliva and 54.5 μL of pooled supragingival plaque and 54.5 µL of pooled tongue biofilms, to contain 200 μL inoculum per well. A protein-rich medium was

used to simulate the subgingival environment, and consisted of (g/L): proteose peptone (2.0), tryptose peptone (1.0), yeast extract (1.0), cysteine (0.1), porcine gastric mucin (2.0), NaCl

(3.04), KCl (1.39), ascorbic acid (0.0016), KH2PO4 (0.59) and urea (5 mM), L-arginine (9 mM). In half of the wells, this medium was supplemented with 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated foetal bovine

serum. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated. Biofilm experiments were carried out in triplicate, i.e. three individual CBD plates were used. After

inoculation, the plates were incubated anaerobically in 10% H2, 10% CO2, 80% N2 at 37 °C in an anaerobic workstation. The medium in each well was changed after 24 h and subsequently twice a

week. After three weeks of incubation, biofilms were harvested by snipping pegs from the lid with sterile pliers and scraping the biofilms carefully with a dental scaler into 500 μL of

sterile phosphate buffered saline25. Three pegs from one CBD plate were pooled together to provide one sample from each plate. Therefore, three independent replicate samples were obtained

for each condition (PRM and PRM + 20% serum). Samples were treated with 1.5 µL propidium monoazide (final concentration 50 μM) prior to DNA isolation according to the manufacturer’s

instructions (Biotium, Fremont, CA) to obtain DNA only from intact cells31. The quantity of DNA was assessed using the Pico Green Kit (Molecular probes, Eugene, OR). SEQUENCING OF

METAGENOMES DNA was isolated from the inoculum and also from three week biofilm samples using the UltraClean® DNA Isolation Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Mo Bio, Carlsbad,

CA). DNA was fragmented with the Covaris system (Covaris, Woburn, MA) to obtain 200 bp DNA fragments. After quality screening, libraries were prepared with NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit

for Illumina® (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR enrichment was performed using six cycles of PCR of denaturation, annealing and extension.

After assessing the quality of the libraries, 100 ng of each library were pooled and submitted for 150 bp paired-end sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq3000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA). DATA

ANALYSIS Adapters were removed with cutadapt32, and sickle v.1.33 was used to quality-trim the paired-end reads. The quality threshold was set at 28, length threshold at 15. Paired-end reads

were mapped against the non-redundant bacterial protein database (downloaded November 2017 from NCBI) using default parameters in diamond33. The metagenomes were uploaded to The MEtaGenome

ANalizer (MEGAN) (v.6.8.9)34 for the analysis of taxonomy and functional potential using the recommended parameters (_min-score_ threshold was set to 80 and _top-percent_ filter was set to

10%, min support 0.01%). MEGAN was used to perform taxonomic binning across taxonomic ranks using the lowest common ancestor algorithm. Phyloseq35 and vegan36 packages in R were used to

analyse alpha diversity of samples and graphically display data using ggplot2 package37. The DESeq238 package was used for differential analysis of taxonomy and functional potential between

different sample groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSES The Tukey honest significant difference test was applied to investigate significant changes in the relative abundance between the inoculum and

biofilm groups. Phyloseq and DESeq2 packages were used to test and plot the presence of differentially abundant species. The negative binomial generalised linear model procedure with Wald

statistics was used with significance of p adjusted values < 0.05. To investigate differences in functional potential between groups, data generated by MEGAN were evaluated with DESeq2

package (p adjusted < 0.05). DATA AVAILABILITY Samples were uploaded to the MG-RAST server39 and are publicly available with the following accessions: mgp19402 and mgp19415. REFERENCES *

Kolenbrander, P. E. _et al_. Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development. _Periodontology 2000_ 42, 47–79 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Kilian, M. _et al_. The oral

microbiome - an update for oral healthcare professionals. _Br Dent J_ 221, 657–666, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.865 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Devine, D. A.,

Marsh, P. D. & Meade, J. Modulation of host responses by oral commensal bacteria. _J Oral Microbiol_ 7, 26941, https://doi.org/10.3402/jom.v7.26941 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Hezel, M. P. & Weitzberg, E. The oral microbiome and nitric oxide homeostasis. _Oral Dis_ 21, 7–16, https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12157 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Tanner, A. C., Kressirer, C. A. & Faller, L. L. Understanding Caries From the Oral Microbiome Perspective. _J Calif Dent Assoc_ 44, 437–446 (2016). PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Bradshaw, D. J., McKee, A. S. & Marsh, P. D. Effects of carbohydrate pulses and pH on population shifts within oral microbial communities _in vitro_. _J Dent Res_ 68, 1298–1302 (1989).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Perez-Chaparro, P. J. _et al_. Newly identified pathogens associated with periodontitis: a systematic review. _J Dent Res_ 93, 846–858,

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514542468 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Dabdoub, S. M., Ganesan, S. M. & Kumar, P. S. Comparative metagenomics reveals

taxonomically idiosyncratic yet functionally congruent communities in periodontitis. _Sci Rep_ 6, 38993, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38993 (2016). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  * Diaz, P. I., Hoare, A. & Hong, B. Y. Subgingival Microbiome Shifts and Community Dynamics in Periodontal Diseases. _J Calif Dent Assoc_ 44, 421–435 (2016). PubMed 

Google Scholar  * Ximenez-Fyvie, L. A., Haffajee, A. D. & Socransky, S. S. Comparison of the microbiota of supra- and subgingival plaque in health and periodontitis. _Journal of clinical

periodontology_ 27, 648–657 (2000). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Socransky, S. S. & Haffajee, A. D. Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. _Periodontology_ _2000_ (28),

12–55 (2002). Article  Google Scholar  * Socransky, S. S. & Haffajee, A. D. Periodontal microbial ecology. _Periodontology_ _2000_ (38), 135–187,

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00107.x (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Genco, R. J., Zambon, J. J. & Christersson, L. A. The origin of periodontal infections. _Adv Dent Res_

2, 245–259, https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374880020020901 (1988). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Slots, J. Periodontal herpesviruses: prevalence, pathogenicity, systemic risk.

_Periodontology_ _2000_ (69), 28–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12085 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Marsh, P. D. Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? _Microbiology_

149, 279–294 (2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hajishengallis, G., Darveau, R. P. & Curtis, M. A. The keystone-pathogen hypothesis. _Nat Rev Microbiol_ 10, 717–725,

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2873 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhou, Y. _et al_. Biogeography of the ecosystems of the healthy human body. _Genome Biol_

14, R1, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-1-r1 (2013). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * David, L. A. _et al_. Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales.

_Genome Biol_ 15, R89, https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-7-r89 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zaura, E., Keijser, B. J., Huse, S. M. & Crielaard, W.

Defining the healthy “core microbiome” of oral microbial communities. _BMC Microbiol_ 9, 259 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Dewhirst, F. E. _et al_. The human oral microbiome. _J

Bacteriol_ 192, 5002–5017, https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00542-10 (2010). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Sanz, M. _et al_. Role of microbial biofilms in the maintenance

of oral health and in the development of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Consensus report of group 1 of the Joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal

disease. _Journal of clinical periodontology_ 44(Suppl 18), S5–S11, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12682 (2017). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hajishengallis, G. The inflammophilic

character of the periodontitis-associated microbiota. _Mol Oral Microbiol_ 29, 248–257, https://doi.org/10.1111/omi.12065 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * ter

Steeg, P. F., van der Hoeven, J. S., de Jong, M. H., van Munster, P. J. J. & Jansen, M. J. H. Enrichment of subgingival microflora on human serum leading to accumulation of Bacteroides

species, peptostreptococci and fusobacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. _Journal of Microbiology_ 53, 261–272 (1987). Google Scholar  * ter Steeg, P. F., van der Hoeven, J. S., de Jong, M. H.,

van Munster, P. J. J. & Jansen, M. J. H. Modelling the gingival pocket by enrichment of subgingival microflora in human serum in chemostats. _Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease_ 1,

73–84 (1988). Article  Google Scholar  * Kistler, J. O., Pesaro, M. & Wade, W. G. Development and pyrosequencing analysis of an _in-vitro_ oral biofilm model. _BMC Microbiol_ 15, 24,

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0364-1 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Marsh, P. D. Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and

disease. _Advances in Dental Research_ 8, 263–271 (1994). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hajishengallis, G. & Lamont, R. J. Beyond the red complex and into more complexity: the

polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model of periodontal disease etiology. _Mol Oral Microbiol_ 27, 409–419 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hasturk, H. _et al_. Resolvin E1

regulates inflammation at the cellular and tissue level and restores tissue homeostasis _in vivo_. _J Immunol_ 179, 7021–7029 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ceri, H. _et al_. The

Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. _J Clin Microbiol_ 37, 1771–1776 (1999). CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  * De Jong, M. H. & Van der Hoeven, J. S. The growth of oral bacteria on saliva. _J Dent Res_ 66, 498–505, https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660021901 (1987). Article 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Exterkate, R. A. _et al_. The effect of propidium monoazide treatment on the measured bacterial composition of clinical samples after the use of a mouthwash. _Clin

Oral Investig_ 19, 813–822, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1297-z (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput

sequencing reads. 2011 17, https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200. 10–12 (2011). * Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. _Nat Methods_

12, 59–60, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3176 (2015). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Huson, D. H., Mitra, S., Ruscheweyh, H. J., Weber, N. & Schuster, S. C. Integrative analysis

of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. _Genome Res_ 21, 1552–1560, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.120618.111 (2011). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * McMurdie, P. J.

& Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. _PLoS One_ 8, e61217, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217

(2013). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Crist, T. O., Veech, J. A., Gering, J. C. & Summerville, K. S. Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and

regions: a hierarchical analysis of alpha, beta, and gamma diversity. _Am Nat_ 162, 734–743, https://doi.org/10.1086/378901 (2003). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wickham, H. ggplot2:

elegant graphics for data analysis. (Springer, 2009). * Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. _Genome Biol_

15, 550, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 (2014). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Keegan, K. P., Glass, E. M. & Meyer, F. MG-RAST, a Metagenomics

Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function. _Methods Mol Biol_ 1399, 207–233, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3369-3_13 (2016). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google

Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS James Kistler and William Wade (QMUL and KCL, London) are thanked for providing training to M.N. in the use of the Calgary Biofilm Device to

grow biofilms. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Division of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK Monika Naginyte, Thuy Do, Josephine Meade, Deirdre

Ann Devine & Philip David Marsh Authors * Monika Naginyte View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Thuy Do View author publications You can

also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Josephine Meade View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Deirdre Ann Devine View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Philip David Marsh View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

CONTRIBUTIONS M.N., T.D., J.M., D.A.D. and P.D.M. designed the project. M.N. performed the experiments, and analysed the data. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript. CORRESPONDING

AUTHOR Correspondence to Thuy Do. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains

neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY DATASET 1 RIGHTS AND

PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any

medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The

images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not

included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly

from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Naginyte, M., Do,

T., Meade, J. _et al._ Enrichment of periodontal pathogens from the biofilms of healthy adults. _Sci Rep_ 9, 5491 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41882-y Download citation *

Received: 11 August 2018 * Accepted: 21 February 2019 * Published: 02 April 2019 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41882-y SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with

will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt

content-sharing initiative