ABSTRACT The surface wettability of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) was investigated with low energy Ar+ ion beam irradiation varied from 300 eV to 800 eV both at normal and oblique angle of

incidence (0°–70°) and at a low irradiation time of few 10 s of seconds. A remarkable change in surface wettability was observed, surface became hydrophobic to superhydrophobic just at 800 

eV energy and in 30 s time. A systematic increase in the contact angle was observed with increase in beam energy and irradiation time. For a given ion energy and a threshold irradiation

time, the hierarchical protrusions developed that leads to the rolling and bouncing of water droplet even on the horizontal PTFE surface. For the above energy range, the rolling speed was

(_S__E_ ~ 0.35 mN/m) at normal incidence. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ANALYSIS OF TIME-DEPENDENT HYDROPHOBIC RECOVERY ON PLASMA-TREATED SUPERHYDROPHOBIC POLYPROPYLENE USING XPS

AND WETTABILITY MEASUREMENTS Article Open access 10 October 2024 HYDROPHOBICITY OF PERIODIC STRUCTURE WITH TAPER ANGLE UNDER PRESSURE IMPACT Article Open access 04 December 2024 ROBUST

ICEPHOBIC COATING BASED ON THE SPIKY FLUORINATED AL2O3 PARTICLES Article Open access 08 March 2021 INTRODUCTION Over the last two decades, fabrication of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic

surfaces has extensively increased due to their superior water repellent property1. Also, development of functional surfaces with self-cleaning2,3, anti-scratch3,4, anti-icing5,6,

anti-corrosion7,8,9 and fog harvesting10 properties has turn out to be an emerging field of research and technological applications. Superhydrophobic surfaces also have important role in

water harvesting, water condensation and heat transfer11,12,13. As superhydrophobicity is achieved by having very large contact angle (θ > 150°) with low surface energy, a substantial

amount of study has been carried out in order to modify surface properties either by surface structuring or by changing surface chemistry. Various fabrication processes are available to

achieve hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces including coating techniques like sputter deposition14,15,16, chemical vapour deposition17,18,19,20 and surface structuring techniques like

plasma etching21,22,23,24, ion beam irradiation25,26,27,28, etc. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or Teflon is widely used for the fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces due to its low

surface free energy (~20 mN/m at 20 °C). Teflon and Teflon-like coatings found number of applications in automobiles, non-stick cookware, and medical applications due to high heat

resistance, excellent electrical insulation and biocompatibility29. As PTFE is hydrophobic in nature, many investigations have been carried out to alter its wettability by modifying the

surface structures. Use of various plasma treatments like Ar30,31,32, O224,33,34,35 or Ar + O223,36 modifies the wetting behaviour of PTFE. But the plasma treatment involves many process

parameters like type of plasma (DC, RF, etc.), working pressure and also requires a treatment time for several hours to achieve superhydrophobicity. H.C. Barshilia _et al_.23 have developed

superhydrophobic PTFE surface using combination of Ar and O2 plasma which required 4 hours of treatment time. On other hand, ion beam irradiation technique is considered to be a universal

method to produce well organized structures on semiconductor28,37, metal38,39 and polymer surfaces40,41,42. Although, a very few wettability studies have been carried out on PTFE surfaces

using ion beams43,44,45,46,47. Yoon _et al_.43 used Ar ion bombardment on PTFE surface by varying the ion fluence from 1015–1017 ion/cm2 and found that contact angle is increasing with

increase in ion fluence. But they have not mentioned the ion beam energy. Chen _et al_.44 used extremely high energies of 60 keV O3+ and 24 keV F4+ ions with very low fluences and found that

contact angle is decreased. Inoue _et al_.45 irradiated the PTFE surface with a ion energy range of 8–30 keV for the fluence range of 3.1 × 1016–18.3 × 1016 ions/cm2 and found that surface

become ultra-hydrophobic. Lee _et al_.46 used fixed low energy Ar and Oxygen ions of 1.5 keV and produced hydrophobic surfaces. A. Atta _et al_.47 have investigated the wettability of PTFE

using 3 keV Ar+ ion beam and concluded that Ar+ ion beam irradiation has increased the wettability of PTFE and made the surface hydrophilic due to formation of hydrophilic groups on the

surface. They showed that upon ion beam irradiation, PTFE surface is defluorinated which resulted in C-C bond splitting and liberation of CF2 bonds. In contrast to the above

results43,44,45,46,47, we have found remarkable changes in wettability (increase in hydrophobicity) of PTFE just after few seconds of Ar+ ion beam irradiation at energy as low as 300 eV. It

was observed in most of the literature that the studies are limited to only one or two higher ion energies and fixed angle of incidence. There is no mention about temperature induced

structural changes in the studies performed at very higher energies of 8–30 keV and higher fluences. Based on this review of ion beam irradiation on PTFE surface, it was found that a

systematic and in depth study at lower ion energy range (300–800 eV) with different angle of incidence (0°–70°) and fluences is completely missing. Therefore, we report a systematic study

which is desirable to understand the wetting behaviour of PTFE with Ar+ ion beams on the above mentioned parameter range. In the present study, we have observed that PTFE surface become

superhydrophobic under lower energy (300–800 eV) Ar+ ion beam irradiation. Also, with the help of oblique incidence irradiation surface can become superhydrophobic at much lower fluences and

energies without any additional gas and high energy ion beams. The surface morphology and the surface roughness are analysed using Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), respectively. The performance of superhydrophobic surface is investigated by contact angle, surface free energy and rolling speed calculation. We also

demonstrate the transition from Wenzel48 to Cassie-Baxter49 state of PTFE surface after higher beam energy and longer irradiation time with the help of optical images of water drop, contact

angle hysteresis, sliding angle and surface free energy measurements. For technological view point, this technique would be helpful to develop superhydrophobic bulk PTFE sheets in very less

time duration and specific surface region can be make superhydrophobic by using masking or ion beam writing. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION SURFACE MORPHOLOGY INVESTIGATION BY FESEM Figure 1 shows

the surface morphology of pristine as well as ion beam treated PTFE surfaces at different ion energies for same time duration of 60 s. The pristine sample looks very smooth with several

cracks on its surface (Fig. 1a). At 300 eV, irregular structures with long cross chains (Fig. 1b) are observed. At 500 eV, the cross linked chains break and regular sub-micron scale

structures start forming with sharp top edges as shown in the inset view of Fig. 1c. Further increase in the beam energy results in more pronounced and sharp structures. The hierarchical

structures have been observed with nano-scale roughness on micro-scale structures (Inset view of Fig. 1d). At lower beam energy of 300 eV and 60 s irradiation time, the Ar+ ions energy is

not high enough to create separated microstructures on the surface and only long cross-chains are produced on the surface, reflecting the initiation of structure formation. Penetration depth

of Ar+ ions in PTFE would be higher in case of 800 eV as compare to 300 eV, hence, Ar+ ions penetrate deep inside the surface, break the chains and produce sharper edged microstructures

with increasing in ion beam energy. Figure 2 shows the surface morphology of PTFE, ion irradiated at oblique angle of incidence (40° and 70°) with respect to the surface normal for same time

duration of 60 s. In this case, well aligned regular structures are observed in the direction of ion beam even at beam energy of 300 eV and angle of incidence of 40° (Fig. 2a). As the angle

of incidence is increased to 70°, the structures are stretched in the direction to incident beam (Fig. 2b). The same result is observed at 800 eV with larger and more stretched structures

(Fig. 2b,c). In case of oblique angle of incidence irradiation, hierarchical structures are observed. Figure 3 shows the role of irradiation time (ion fluence) on the morphology of

irradiated PTFE surfaces for 800 eV beam energy. Initially, at low time duration, long cross-chains are observed (Fig. 3a), which are then converted into micro-structures (Fig. 3b). As

irradiation time is increased further, the micro-structures become larger in size (Fig. 3c–e) and finally a porous surface is developed at 780 s with pore size between 0.5–1.0 µm (Fig. 3f).

SURFACE ROUGHNESS ANALYSIS BY AFM Figure 4 shows the AFM topography of PTFE surface and variation in the average surface roughness (_R__a_) with ion beam energy from 300 eV to 800 eV for 60 

s at normal incidence. Pristine PTFE is very smooth (Fig. 4a) with _R__a_ equals to 88.0 nm. Upon irradiation at 300 eV, irregular features start forming on the surface and therefore _R__a_

increases to 135.0 nm. A drastic increase in surface roughness is observed after irradiation with 400 eV beam energy (_R__a_ ~ 147 nm) and reaches to the maximum value of 386.3 nm for 800 

eV. A systematic increase in the contact angle is clearly seen with increase in surface roughness. But, in spite of increase in _R__a_, saturation in the contact angle is observed after

irradiation with 400 eV beam energy. This systematic increase in surface roughness is a result of increase in surface structures size with increase in beam energy, which can be further

confirmed by FESEM images. CONTACT ANGLE MEASUREMENT Since, the contact angle investigation has turned out to be a simple approach to study the wettability of any surface, water contact

angle (WCA) measurement was carried out using a sessile drop method. Figures 1–3 also show the value of contact angle in inset of every image. As shown in Fig. 1a, Untreated PTFE is already

hydrophobic (WCA: 105.2°) in nature. Figure 5a shows the variation in the contact angle with ion beam energy and irradiation time. After irradiation for 30 s only, the contact angle has

reached a range between 140°–150° corresponding to its beam energy. At lower irradiation time, i.e. 30 s and 60 s, scattered contact angle values are observed with increase in beam energy,

but, after 120 s, a systematic increase in contact angle has been observed with increase in beam energy. In case of 800 eV, the contact angle of PTFE surface reaches to 149.7° for 30 s and

increases to a maximum value of 152.6° for 240 s with very less deviation. Figure 5a also shows the threshold value of irradiation time for which the water droplet starts rolling over the

horizontal surface corresponding to each beam energy. Above the threshold irradiation time, adhesion of water droplet with PTFE surface becomes so low that the water droplet just rolls off

when it is dispensed even on a horizontal surface (Movie S1). It can be observed that water droplet does not roll even after 240 s of irradiation time for 300 eV, however, as the beam energy

increases, droplet starts rolling at just 180 s of irradiation time for 400 to 800 eV energy and at normal incidence irradiation. Although the threshold irradiation time is same for above

mentioned energies (400–800 eV), the speed at which water droplet rolls from the surface is quite different for different energies. Table 1 shows the measurement of rolling speed of water

droplet as a function of ion beam energy and irradiation time. It also represents the threshold value of time duration for a water droplet to roll off from a surface. The rolling phenomena

for 300 eV irradiation are observed only after irradiation of 600 s with rolling speed of 19.1 mm/s. As the beam energy increases, the rolling speed also increases and reaches to 31.2 mm/s

for 800 eV. As the beam energy is increased, the ion beam penetration in the surface also increases and therefore the size of structures became larger at 800 eV. Since, the air gap between

the structures in case of 800 eV irradiation is much higher than 400 eV, the upward force on water droplet during rolling will be higher, which in turn increases the rolling speed of the

water droplet at higher beam energies. Figure 5c shows the variation in the contact angle with angle of incidence of ion beam. For 300 eV, as the angle of incidence is increased from 0° to

40°, there is a systematic increase in the contact angle from 137.4° to 146.3° respectively. This increment is followed by a drastic reduction in contact angle for 60° (WCA: 133.1°) and 70°

(WCA: 131.4°) of angle of incidence. But, a continuous reduction (WCA: 150.1° to 140.4°) in contact angle is observed with increase in angle incidence (0° to 70°) in case of 800 eV. It is

known that ion penetration depth changes with ion energy and angle of incidence. At normal angle of incidence higher energy ion will penetrate more dip inside the surface. Therefore, at

higher energies of around 600 eV and above larger structures are formed with higher surface roughness. Similarly, it is also known that when angle of incidence increases penetration depth

initially increases and then start reducing assuming a Gaussian distribution of energy profile inside layers. At the higher grazing angles ion impact mainly remains near the surface

resulting in lower roughness and hence contact angle. These are the probable reason that since with angle of incidence initially roughness increases and then reduces, results in the observed

variation in contact angle. The wetting state of any liquid on a rough solid surface is described by two wettability models: Wenzel state48 and Cassie-Baxter state49. According to Wenzel

state theory, the liquid penetrates inside the grooves of the surface. If the initial surface is hydrophobic, then the hydrophobicity is enhanced by increasing the surface roughness and the

apparent contact angle (_θ__W_) is given by, $$cos{\theta }_{W}=rcos\theta $$ (1) where, _r_ is the roughness factor, which is defined as the ratio of the actual surface area to the

projected surface area and _θ_ is the contact angle on a plain surface. Whereas, Cassie-Baxter theory states that the air pockets are trapped in between the grooves of the rough surface and

liquid does not penetrate through the grooves. In this case, the apparent contact angle (_θ__CB_) is given by, $$cos{\theta }_{CB}=fcos\theta +(f-1)$$ (2) where, _f_ is the fraction of

solid-liquid interface. Therefore, when a liquid is in a Cassie-Baxter State, it exhibits a higher contact angle which is a basis for achieving the superhydrophobic surfaces. Hence,

Cassie-Baxter state is attributed to a very low adhesion and high mobility of liquid droplet on a solid surface due to very less solid-liquid interaction. Since, the formation of

microstructures has a great dependence on the beam energy and ion fluence, the rolling of water droplet also depends on both of these parameters. Here, _θ__CB_ can be well predicted by

obtaining the _f_ value from FESEM image analysis and can be compared with experimentally measured values. However, it is very clear from FESEM images that ion beam irradiated PTFE surface

are not very regular in shape, some places they are tilted and twisted. Based on this FESEM contrast information, it is difficult to calculate the exact or nearly exact solid area fraction

(_f_) with the available image analysis software (ImageJ). In case of angle of incident even structures are tilted, so it is even more difficult to calculate the solid area fraction.

However, an attempt has been made to calculate the value of _f_ for few clean cases for normal incidence irradiation asshown in Table 2 and found that measured and calculated contact angles

are nearly same with maximum error of 8.5%, due to the fact that calculated _f_ is always higher than the actual values. This matching of measured and calculated contact angle clearly

indicates that produced surfaces after ion beam irradiation are in Cassie-Baxter state. In this study, the surface roughness and the contact angle have increased with increase in beam energy

and irradiation time. For lower energy (300–500 eV) and irradiation time (30–120 s), the water droplet remains in Wenzel state, because, upon increase in surface roughness, the contact

angle increases, but the adhesion of droplet remains high enough to prevent its rolling. After the threshold irradiation time for each beam energy, water droplet starts rolling due to very

low adhesion of droplet with the surface and it may be described as the transition of droplet from the Wenzel state to the Cassie-Baxter state as shown above. It can also be confirmed by

FESEM analysis, which shows the formation of micron size structures with large pores on PTFE after irradiation at 800 eV with longer time duration (Fig. 3). A clear transition in wetting

state is seen from 180 s irradiation time, after which droplet rolls off from the surface. This wetting transition is further confirmed by contact angle hysteresis (CAH), sliding angle

measurements (Table 3) and magnified optical images of water drop resting on untreated and treated surfaces (Fig. S1). The untreated PTFE surface has CAH value of 18.2°, which gradually

decreases with ion beam energy and treatment time. For 300 eV, CAH decreases from 12.3° for 60 s to 3.5° for 540 s. Upon increase in beam energy to 500 eV, CAH decreases from 6.2° for 60 s

to 4.3° for 180 s and finally attains the value of 1.8° for 800 eV, 180 s. Similarly, sliding angle values are also decreasing with ion beam energy and treatment time. The untreated PTFE is

not rolling from the surface even after tilting the manual tilting stage upto 70° (sliding angle is beyond the instrument range). Similar results are observed for 60 s and 180 s irradiated

surfaces at 300 eV beam energy, but after 540 s irradiation, sliding angle became 8°. When beam energy has increased from 500 eV to 800 eV, the sliding angle has also decreased from 28° to

3° for 60 s treatment time. The rolling phenomena is observed in both the cases for 180 s. Figure S1 shows the optical images of water drop resting on untreated and ion beam treated surface.

When water drop rests on untreated surface, it fills the whole surface area which is shown by white dotted box in Fig. S1. After irradiation at 300 eV for 60 s, same result is observed,

which shows that the water drop remains in the Wenzel state. But, after irradiation at 800 eV for 180 s, water droplet does not penetrate inside the structures due to large upward force

provided by air pockets between the structures, which are clear indication of Cassie-Baxter state. Theses combined results from optical images, rolling phenomena, CAH and sliding angle

measurements have confirmed that low energy ion beam irradiation can tune the Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter states by tuning its beam energy and treatment time on PTFE surfaces. SURFACE FREE

ENERGY The surface free energy (_S__E_) of irradiated PTFE surfaces is calculated using OWRK50 method as described elsewhere47,50, which involves determination of surface free energy by

measuring contact angle of a solid surface by a polar (e.g. water) and a non-polar (e.g. diiodomethane) liquid with known polar (\({\gamma }_{lv}^{P}\)) and non-polar (\({\gamma

}_{lv}^{D}\)) components as shown in Table S1. As the surface free energy of any solid surface is the sum of its polar (\({\gamma }_{sv}^{P}\)) and non-polar (\({\gamma }_{sv}^{D}\))

components, it is derived from the Young’s equation as follows: Young’s contact angle equation is given by, $${\gamma }_{lv}cos\theta ={\gamma }_{sv}-{\gamma }_{sl}$$ (3) where, _γ__sl_,

_γ__lv_, and _γ__sv_ are solid-liquid, liquid-vapor and solid-vapor interfacial tensions respectively. _γ__sl_ can also be written below as proposed by OWRK model: $${\gamma }_{sl}={\gamma

}_{sv}+{\gamma }_{lv}-2(\sqrt{{\gamma }_{sv}^{D}{\gamma }_{lv}^{D}}+\sqrt{{\gamma }_{sv}^{P}{\gamma }_{lv}^{P}})$$ (4) After substituting the value of \({\gamma }_{sl}\) from eq. (3) to eq.

(4) and simplifying, one would get the following equation which indicates the equation of a straight line. $$\sqrt{{\gamma }_{sv}^{D}}+\sqrt{{\gamma }_{sv}^{P}}\sqrt{\frac{{\gamma

}_{lv}^{P}}{{\gamma }_{lv}^{D}}}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{{\gamma }_{lv}(1+cos\theta )}{\sqrt{{\gamma }_{lv}^{D}}}$$ (5) By solving eq. (5) for \(\sqrt{{\gamma }_{sv}^{P}}\) and \(\sqrt{{\gamma

}_{sv}^{D}}\), the polar and non-polar component of surface free energy can be determined, which in turn summed up to the total surface energy of any solid surface. Figure 5b shows the

variation in the surface free energy of irradiated PTFE surfaces at various beam energies and normal angle of incidence as function of irradiation time. For a particular beam energy, _S__E_

decreases as a function of irradiation time. _S__E_ starts decreasing almost linearly for lower beam energy (300 eV and 400 eV) and becomes exponentially decreasing for higher beam energy

(600 eV and 800 eV). For 300 eV, _S__E_ varies as 4.24 mN/m, 3.63 mN/m, 3 mN/m, 2.5 mN/m and 2.1 mN/m. In case of 800 eV, _S__E_ starts from 1.86 mN/m for 30 s irradiation and reached to

0.31mN/m for 240 s irradiation time. When PTFE surface is irradiated at oblique angle of incidence, a systematic increase in surface free energy is observed with increase in the angle of

incidence (Fig. 5d). For small change in angle of incidence (upto 20°), _S__E_ varies irregularly and very slow for the beam energy of 300 eV and 800 eV respectively, but follows linear and

exponential growth respectively thereafter. Table 4 shows the polar and dispersive parts of surface free energy of irradiated PTFE surfaces measured using OWRK method. Both \({\gamma

}_{sv}^{P}\) and \({\gamma }_{sv}^{D}\) decreases with increase in beam energy and irradiation time. For the beam energies of 300 eV and 400 eV, no significant change in \({\gamma

}_{sv}^{P}\) and \({\gamma }_{sv}^{D}\) is observed. With systematic increase in beam energy, polar component has gradually decreased to zero for 180 s and 240 s irradiation time. Low

surface free energy leads to high mobility, large contact angle and low adhesion of water with solid surface. The durability of superhydrophobic PTFE surface has been observed by keeping the

sample in air medium for several months and checking the contact angle at periodic time. Figure 6a shows the performance of superhydrophobic PTFE surface in ambient environment. PTFE

surface retains its superhydrophobicity even after five months with a decrease in contact angle from 152.6° to 150.2°. Figure 6b shows the photograph of the word “IPR” written with water

droplets on the superhydrophobic PTFE surface achieved after ion beam treatment. A blue colour dye has been mixed with DI water in order to present the photograph effectively. The water

droplet of about 10 µL in volume (radius of spherical droplet of about 1.4 mm) was used to perform the bouncing test from 10 mm above the surface. Fig. 6c,d shows the bouncing droplet on 800

 eV irradiated PTFE for 180 s at normal and 40° angle of incidence, respectively. The vertical height obtained by water drop after first impact is almost same for both the cases. However, at

normal incidence droplet start rolling, but at 40° angle of incidence droplet only jumps few times and then remain static in its position without rolling. As discussed earlier, the height

of the structures formed in PTFE surface at oblique incidence is less, which results in lower air pockets within the structures and give relatively lesser push to the water droplets for

rolling and bouncing, which prevent the water drop from rolling while bouncing. In summary, we have observed that ion beam irradiation leads to a clear growth in structure formation with

increase in beam energy and irradiation time. Increase in the surface roughness with improved structures is a result of stretching of the protrusions, not the sputtering and re-deposition of

material41,42. Due to this phenomena, higher beam energy irradiation results in nicely separated high aspect-ratio structures, which are the basis for the formation of superhydrophobic

surfaces. The air pockets created between the microstructures prevent the water droplet to spread on completely on a surface and reach to the Cassie-Baxter state. PTFE surface became so

superhydrophobic that the water droplet just rolls off from the horizontal surface like “Lotus Effect”51. This effect is derived from the lotus leaf, in which hierarchical structures are

observed. Upon ion beam irradiation, PTFE surface also exhibit excellent water repellent property with hierarchical structures on its surface. CONCLUSIONS Superhydrophobic and water

repellent PTFE surface is fabricated using low energy Ar+ ion beam irradiation. FESEM investigations reveal the formation of regular hierarchical protrusions at higher ion energy and

glancing angle irradiation. A systematic increase in the contact angle has been observed with increase in ion energy and hence the surface roughness as confirmed by AFM analysis. Ion beam

energy dependent contact angle study has shown the saturation in contact angle values for longer irradiation time, but, after a threshold time according to the beam energy, the water droplet

starts rolling over the surface. The surface free energy reduces more rapidly in case of 600 eV and 800 eV beam energy compare to the low energy irradiation. Calculation of solid area

fraction, _f_ concluded that experimental _θ__M_ values are well matched with theoretically calculated _θ__CB_ values. Also, large reduction in sliding angle and CAH values of ion irradiated

surface has further confirmed the Cassie-Baxter state of water droplet. The minimization of polar component of surface free energy after ion beam irradiation has indicated the absence of

any polar group on the superhydrophobic PTFE surface. METHODS ION BEAM IRRADIATION Commercial PTFE samples (20 mm × 20 mm × 2 mm) were first rinsed with distilled water and then cleaned with

acetone and isopropyl alcohol in ultrasonicator. Specimens were placed in the ultra-high cylindrical vacuum chamber (90 cm diameter) for ion beam irradiation with base pressure of 8 × 10−8

mbar and working pressure of 2.3 × 10−4 mbar. Low energy Kaufman type ion source (Sinaris 40-i, Microsystems GmbH) with beam energy from 300 eV to 800 eV was used to irradiate PTFE specimens

with Ar+ ions. PTFE samples were irradiated with the ion fluence from 1 × 1016 ions/cm2 to 3 × 1018 ions/cm2 and time duration from 30 s to 780 s at normal as well as oblique (10°, 20°,

40°, 60° and 70°) angle of incidence. SURFACE CHARACTERIZATION The surface morphology of unirradiated as well as irradiated PTFE surfaces was analysed using FESEM (Carl Zeiss Merlin VP). The

variation in surface roughness before and after ion beam irradiation was investigated by AFM (NT-MDT NTEGRA). The sessile drop method was used to measure the water contact angle (CA) by

using a goniometer (OCA 15EC, Dataphysics), with contact angle measurement range of 0°–180° and accuracy of ± 0.1° at room temperature (25 °C). The contact angle was measured by dispensing

10 µL of deionized water droplet on the surface. The reason behind dispensing 10 µL was that after ion beam irradiation, the adhesion of water droplet with PTFE surface became so low that

the small volume droplet (~5 µL) was not able to dispense from the needle. Therefore, sufficient amount of volume was needed (~10 µL) to dispense water droplet from the needle by its own

weight. The rolling speed of the water droplet was calculated by taking a video of rolling droplet and measuring a distance between two positions of a droplet and the time taken between

these two positions. The contact angle hysteresis (CAH) was determined by advancing and receding contact angle measurement using sessile drop needle-in method. The sliding angle was measured

by using manual tilting stage (with range of 0°–70° and accuracy of ± 1°). The surface free energy (_S__E_) was calculated by measuring the contact angle of two different liquids (water and

diiodomethane) software using OWRK (Owens, Wendt, Rabel and Kaelble) method50. The durability of the irradiated surfaces was analysed by keeping the samples in the air for five months and

checking the wettability on periodic time duration. DATA AVAILABILITY All the data used to support this study will be made available upon appropriate request. REFERENCES * Simpson, J. T.,

Hunter, S. R. & Aytug, T. Superhydrophobic materials and coatings: A review. _Reports Prog. Phys._ 78, 86501 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Bhushan, B. & Jung, Y. C. Natural and

biomimetic artificial surfaces for superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, low adhesion, and drag reduction. _Prog. Mater. Sci._ 56, 1–108 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhang, Z. _et

al_. One-step fabrication of robust superhydrophobic and superoleophilic surfaces with self- cleaning and oil/water separation function. _Sci. Rep._ 8, 3869 (2018). Article  CAS  ADS  Google

Scholar  * Feng, Y., Xu, X., Fan, X., Ding, H. & Wang, P. Fabrication of Mechanically Robust Superhydrophobic Coating on Aluminium Surface. _IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. Pap._ 394,

22053 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Farhadi, S., Farzaneh, M. & Kulinich, S. A. Anti-icing performance of superhydrophobic surfaces. _Appl. Surf. Sci._ 257, 6264–6269 (2011).

Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Wang, L., Gong, Q., Zhan, S., Jiang, L. & Zheng, Y. Robust Anti-Icing Performance of a Flexible Superhydrophobic Surface. _Adv. Mater._ 28, 7729–7735

(2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Mohamed, A. M. A., Abdullah, A. M. & Younan, N. A. Corrosion behavior of superhydrophobic surfaces: A review. _Arab. J. Chem._ 8, 749–765 (2015).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Zhao, E., Li, Y., Gao, L., Yang, S. & Ma, T. Anti-corrosion properties of a bioinspired superhydrophobic surface on stainless steel. _Int. J.

Electrochem. Sci._ 12, 9855–9864 (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sebastian, D., Yao, C.-W. & Lian, I. Mechanical Durability of Engineered Superhydrophobic Surfaces for

Anti-Corrosion. _Coatings_ 8, 162 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Zhou, H., Zhang, M., Li, C., Gao, C. & Zheng, Y. Excellent Fog-Droplets Collector via Integrative Janus Membrane and

Conical Spine with Micro/Nanostructures. _Small_ 14, 1–7 (2018). CAS  Google Scholar  * Chen, C. H. _et al_. Dropwise condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces with two-tier roughness.

_Appl. Phys. Lett._ 90, 2005–2008 (2007). Google Scholar  * Yin, L., Wang, Y., Ding, J., Wang, Q. & Chen, Q. Water condensation on superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces with different

low-surface-energy coatings. _Appl. Surf. Sci._ 258, 4063–4068 (2012). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Miljkovic, N. & Wang, E. N. Condensation heat transfer on superhydrophobic

surfaces. _MRS Bull._ 38, 397–406 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Drábik, M. _et al_. Super-hydrophobic coatings prepared by RF magnetron sputtering of PTFE. _Plasma Process. Polym._

7, 544–551 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Sarkar, D. K., Farzaneh, M. & Paynter, R. W. Superhydrophobic properties of ultrathin rf-sputtered Teflon films coated etched aluminum

surfaces. _Mater. Lett._ 62, 1226–1229 (2008). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tripathi, S. _et al_. Investigation of optical and microstructural properties of RF magnetron sputtered PTFE

films for hydrophobic applications. _Appl. Surf. Sci._ 385, 289–298 (2016). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Zhuang, A. _et al_. Transparent superhydrophobic PTFE films via one-step

aerosol assisted chemical vapor deposition. _RSC Adv._ 7, 29275–29283 (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Satyaprasad, A., Jain, V. & Nema, S. K. Deposition of superhydrophobic

nanostructured Teflon-like coating using expanding plasma arc. _Appl. Surf. Sci._ 253, 5462–5466 (2007). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Thongrom, S., Tirawanichakul, Y., Munsit, N.

& Deangngam, C. One-step microwave plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (MW-PECVD) for transparent superhydrophobic surface. _IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng_. 311, (2018). *

Rouessac, V. _et al_. Fluorine-free superhydrophobic microstructured films grown by PECVD. _Chem. Vap. Depos._ 17, 198–203 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Xie, L., Tang, Z., Jiang,

L., Breedveld, V. & Hess, D. W. Creation of superhydrophobic wood surfaces by plasma etching and thin-film deposition. _Surf. Coatings Technol._ 281, 125–132 (2015). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Jafari, R., Asadollahi, S. & Farzaneh, M. Applications of plasma technology in development of superhydrophobic surfaces. _Plasma Chem. Plasma Process._ 33, 177–200 (2013).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Barshilia, H. C. & Gupta, N. Superhydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene surfaces with leaf-like micro-protrusions through Ar + O2 plasma etching process.

_Vacuum_ 99, 42–48 (2014). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Zanini, S., Bami, R., Pergola, R. Della & Riccardi, C. Development of super-hydrophobic PTFE and PET surfaces by means of

plasma processes. _J. Phys. Conf. Ser_. 550, (2014). * Keller, A. _et al_. Tuning the hydrophobicity of mica surfaces by hyperthermal Ar ion irradiation. _J. Chem. Phys_. 134, (2011).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Metya, A., Ghose, D. & Ray, N. R. Development of hydrophobicity of mica surfaces by ion beam sputtering. _Appl. Surf. Sci._ 293, 18–23 (2014). Article 

CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Kumar, T., Singh, U. B., Kumar, M., Ojha, S. & Kanjilal, D. Tuning of ripple patterns and wetting dynamics of Si (100) surface using ion beam irradiation.

_Curr. Appl. Phys._ 14, 312–317 (2014). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Garg, S. K. _et al_. Tunable wettability of Si through surface energy engineering by nanopatterning. _RSC Adv._ 6,

48550–48557 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Noh, J. H., Baik, H. K., Noh, I., Park, J. C. & Lee, I. S. Surface modification of polytetrafluoroethylene using atmospheric pressure

plasma jet for medical application. _Surf. Coatings Technol._ 201, 5097–5101 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kolská, Z., Řezníčková, A., Hnatowicz, V. & Švorčík, V. PTFE surface

modification by Ar plasma and its characterization. _Vacuum_ 86, 643–647 (2012). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Sarani, A. _et al_. Surface modification of PTFE using an atmospheric

pressure plasma jet in argon and argon + CO2. _Surf. Coatings Technol._ 206, 2226–2232 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wilson, D. J., Williams, R. L. & Pond, R. C. Plasma

modification of PTFE surfaces - Part I: Surfaces immediately following plasma treatment. _Surf. Interface Anal._ 31, 385–396 (2001). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Salapare, H. S. _et al_.

Stability of the hydrophilic and superhydrophobic properties of oxygen plasma-treated poly(tetrafluoroethylene) surfaces. _J. Colloid Interface Sci._ 396, 287–292 (2013). Article  CAS  ADS 

Google Scholar  * Zanini, S., Barni, R., Pergola, R. D. & Riccardi, C. Modification of the PTFE wettability by oxygen plasma treatments: Influence of the operating parameters and

investigation of the ageing behaviour. _J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys_. 47, (2014). * Di Mundo, R., Bottiglione, F., Palumbo, F., Notarnicola, M. & Carbone, G. Filamentary superhydrophobic

Teflon surfaces: Moderate apparent contact angle but superior air-retaining properties. _J. Colloid Interface Sci._ 482, 175–182 (2016). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Ryu, J. _et al_.

Nearly Perfect Durable Superhydrophobic Surfaces Fabricated by a Simple One-Step Plasma Treatment. _Sci. Rep._ 7, 1–8 (2017). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Ranjan, M., Facsko, S.,

Fritzsche, M. & Mukherjee, S. Plasmon resonance tuning in Ag nanoparticles arrays grown on ripple patterned templates. _Microelectron. Eng._ 102, 44–47 (2013). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Karmakar, P. & Ghose, D. Ion beam sputtering induced ripple formation in thin metal films. _Surf. Sci_. 554, (2004). * Buatier De Mongeot, F. & Valbusa, U. Applications of

metal surfaces nanostructured by ion beam sputtering. _J. Phys. Condens. Matter_ 21, (2009). * Kitamura, A., Kobayashi, T., Suzuki, A. & Terai, T. Fabrication of fine micro protrusions

on fluoropolymer surface using ion beam irradiation. _Surf. Coatings Technol._ 206, 841–844 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ogawa, A. K. _et al_. Morphological change of

self-organized protrusions of fluoropolymer surface by ion beam irradiation. _Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. with Mater. Atoms_ 307, 614–617 (2013). Article  ADS

  Google Scholar  * Kitamura, A., Kobayashi, T., Meguro, T., Suzuki, A. & Terai, T. The mechanism of protrusion formation on PTFE surface by ion-beam irradiation. _Surf. Coatings

Technol._ 203, 2406–2409 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Yoon, E. S., Yang, S. H., Kong, H. & Kim, K. H. The effect of topography on water wetting and micro/nano tribological

characteristics of polymeric surfaces. _Tribol. Lett._ 15, 145–154 (2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chen, Y., Zhao, Z. & Liu, Y. Wettability characteristic of PTFE and glass

surface irradiated by keV ions. _Appl. Surf. Sci._ 254, 5497–5500 (2008). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Inoue, Y., Yoshimura, Y., Ikeda, Y. & Kohno, A. Ultra-hydrophobic fluorine

polymer by Ar-ion bombardment. _Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces_ 19, 257–261 (2000). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lee, Y. _et al_. Mimicking a Superhydrophobic Insect Wing by Argon and

Oxygen Ion Beam Treatment on Polytetrafluoroethylene Film. _J. Bionic Eng._ 6, 365–370 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Atta, A., Fawzy, Y. H. A., Bek, A., Abdel-Hamid, H. M. &

El-Oker, M. M. Modulation of structure, morphology and wettability of polytetrafluoroethylene surface by low energy ion beam irradiation. _Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam

Interact. with Mater. Atoms_ 300, 46–53 (2013). Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Wenzel, R. N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. _Ind. Eng. Chem._ 28, 988–994 (1936).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Cassie, A. B. D. & Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. _Trans. Faraday Soc._ 40, 546–551 (1944). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Owens, D. K. &

Wendt, R. C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. _J. Appl. Polym. Sci._ 13, 1741–1747 (1969). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Barthlott, W. & Neinhuis, C. Purity of the

sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. _Planta_ 202, 1 (1997). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS *

Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, 38248, India Vivek Pachchigar, Mukesh Ranjan & Subroto Mukherjee * Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400094, India Vivek Pachchigar, 

Mukesh Ranjan & Subroto Mukherjee Authors * Vivek Pachchigar View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Mukesh Ranjan View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Subroto Mukherjee View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS V.P.

performed experiments and measurements. V.P. and M.R. analysed the data and prepared the manuscript. S.M. and M.R. reviewed the manuscript and gave fundamental understanding. All authors

contributed in writing the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Vivek Pachchigar or Mukesh Ranjan. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing

interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION SUPPLYMENTARY INFORMATION MOVIE S1 RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,

sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative

Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated

otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds

the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and

permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Pachchigar, V., Ranjan, M. & Mukherjee, S. Role of Hierarchical Protrusions in Water Repellent Superhydrophobic PTFE Surface Produced by

Low Energy Ion Beam Irradiation. _Sci Rep_ 9, 8675 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45132-z Download citation * Received: 06 February 2019 * Accepted: 30 May 2019 * Published: 17

June 2019 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45132-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a

shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative