Play all audios:
Correction to: _Scientific Reports_ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51484-3, published online 25 October 2019 This Article contains multiple typographical errors. In the Results section,
under the subheading ‘General description of petasma and _appendix masculina_ of the genus _Xiphopenaeus’_: “the central region of the ventral face is concave or convex and has rows of
spines with varied distribution” should read: “the central ventral surface is concave or convex and has rows of spines with varied distribution” In the legend of Figure 6: “junction between
the endopods with cincinuli (seta); C, _Xiphopenaeus kroyeri_ (CCDB 5019): _appendix masculina_ in dorsal view (DS – dorsal surface; RP – rounded projection); D, _Xiphopenaeus kroyeri_ (CCDB
5019): _appendix masculina_ in ventral view (VS - ventral surface; RP - rounded projection; white arrow indicating the row of spines of the posterior margin). should read: “junction between
the endopods with cincinuli; C, _Xiphopenaeus kroyeri_ (CCDB 5019): _appendix masculina_ in dorsal view (DS – dorsal surface; RP – rounded projection); D, _Xiphopenaeus kroyeri_ (CCDB
5019): _appendix masculina_ in ventral view (VS - ventral surface; RP - rounded projection; white arrow indicating the central convex surface). In the Results section, under the subheading
‘General description of petasma and _appendix masculina_ of the genus Xiphopenaeus’: “The posterior margin of the ventral surface is covered by small sparse spines, with a few rows in the
central convex region” should read: “The posterior margin of the ventral surface is covered by small sparse spines, with a few rows in the central convex surface” In the legend of Figure 8:
“_Appendix masculina_ in ventral view; the black arrow indicates the row of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central region; (H) _Appendix masculina_ in
ventral view; the black arrow indicates the row of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central region” should read: “_Appendix masculina_ in ventral view; the
black arrow indicates the row of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central surface; (H) _Appendix masculina_ in ventral view; the black arrow indicates the row
of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central surface. (AM - _appendix masculina_; CxVS - central convex ventral surface; D - distal region of the distolateral
projection; DLP - distolateral projection; E - endopod; P - proximal region of the distolateral projection; RP - round projection of _appendix masculina_).” In the legend of Figures 11, 13
and 14: “_Appendix masculina_ in ventral view; the black arrow indicates the row of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central region; (H) _Appendix masculina_
in ventral view; the black arrow indicates the row of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central region” should read: “_Appendix masculina_ in ventral view; the
black arrow indicates the row of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central surface; (H) _Appendix masculina_ in ventral view; the black arrow indicates the
row of spines of the posterior margin, white arrows indicate the convex central surface. (AM - _appendix masculina_; CcVS - central concave ventral surface; D - distal region of the
distolateral projection; DLP - distolateral projection; E - endopod; P - proximal region of the distolateral projection; RP - round projection of _appendix masculina_).” In the legend of
Figure 15: “6-Colombia ()” should read: “6-Colombia (10°52′30″N; 74°24′10.800″W)” In the results section, in the _Xiphopenaeus dincao_ nov. sp. section under the subheading ‘Description’:
“The posterior margin of the ventral surface is covered by small sparse spines, with a few rows in the central convex region” should read: “The posterior margin of the ventral surface is
covered by small sparse spines, with a few rows in the central concave surface” In the Methods section, under the subheading ‘Morphological Assessment’: “(Catalog numbers — 5019, 5247)”
should read: “(5019, 5247, 5461, 6499)” AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Laboratório de Biologia de Camarões Marinhos e de Água Doce (LABCAM), Departamento de Ciências
Biológicas, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Av. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube 14-01, 17033-360, Bauru, SP, Brazil Abner Carvalho-Batista & Rogerio C. Costa *
Laboratório de Carcinologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Agronomia, 91501-970, Porto
Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Mariana Terossi * Laboratório de Morfologia de Invertebrados (IML), Departamento de Biologia Aplicada, CAUNESP and IEAMar, Universidade Estadual Paulista
(UNESP), FCAV. Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane km 05, 14884-900, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil Fernando J. Zara * Laboratório de Bioecologia e Sistemática de Crustáceos (LBSC),
Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Fernando L. Mantelatto Authors * Abner Carvalho-Batista View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Mariana Terossi View author publications You
can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fernando J. Zara View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Fernando L. Mantelatto View
author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Rogerio C. Costa View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Rogerio C. Costa. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or
exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints
and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Carvalho-Batista, A., Terossi, M., Zara, F.J. _et al._ Author Correction: A multigene and morphological analysis expands the diversity of
the seabod shrimp _Xiphopenaeus_ Smith, 1869 (Decapoda: Penaeidae), with descriptions of two new species. _Sci Rep_ 10, 1263 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58157-6 Download
citation * Published: 22 January 2020 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58157-6 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get
shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative