Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an auto-immune disease in which the body’s immune system attacks the central nervous system. The demyelination of the nerve fibers can lead to physical,
emotional, and cognitive impairments. We wanted to learn about challenges of living with the illness and how people deal with stress. 128 individuals with MS from Austria and the US
participated in the qualitative interviews. We interviewed participants and coded their answers using inductive grounded theory. We asked three open-ended questions to inquire about life
since being diagnosed with MS as well as about dealing with stress. Life shifts since diagnosis involved ‘experiencing limitations’ and could be categorized in ‘emotional changes’, ‘changes
with work’, ‘changes in social interaction’, ‘physical changes’, ‘changes in the medical context’. For dealing with stress active (strategies and activities) and passive coping strategies
(avoid/ignore) were employed. General stress reactions were expressed in areas of emotional, physical and /or lifestyle. We recommend developing interventions in three core areas for the MS
population: (1) dealing with life changes and significant experiences with MS, (2) focusing on the areas where life shifts took place, (3) focusing on active coping with stress and
discussing consequences of passive coping strategies. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS A QUALITATIVE EXPLORATION OF THE PATIENT JOURNEY IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS TOWARDS A
PEOPLE-CENTERED UNDERSTANDING Article Open access 28 August 2024 COMPARING STRESS AND BEHAVIORAL COPING STRATEGIES DURING THE EARLY STAGES OF THE COVID-19 CRISIS AMONG DOMESTIC AND OVERSEAS
TAIWANESE Article Open access 08 July 2022 A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND BAYESIAN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS ON THE EFFICACY AND POTENTIAL OF MOBILE INTERVENTIONS FOR STRESS MANAGEMENT Article 29 April
2025 INTRODUCTION Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic auto-immune disease where the body’s immune system attacks its own central nervous system. Consequently, the demyelination of the
nerve fibers can cause physical, emotional, and cognitive impairments. Living with MS is demanding, with both day-to-day and lifelong challenges. A continuous adjustment to life is
required1. Much qualitative research on this topic has been conducted by interviewing people with MS2,3,4,5,6. We decided to put the focus of our research on life shifts happening with MS
and talked to people with MS about their experiences, life changes, and coping strategies to deal with stress. It usually takes several years after diagnosis before persons with MS are able
to interpret their illness experience in positive ways1. A high level of uncertainty about life and the future is experienced by persons with chronic illness, including MS. In addition,
constantly changing body image following body and performance failures can lead to the loss of salient aspects of the self6. Women and men with MS expressed that they wanted to obtain mental
health interventions immediately after the diagnosis, and that the inclusion of family members in both treatment and the whole experience of having MS was very beneficial for them2,7. With
the physical consequences of the likely progression of MS, a continuous redefinition of identity is required3. Especially in the early stages of MS emotional and avoiding coping strategies
are employed5. The necessity of information about emotional support for coping, the importance of social networks, and physical activity were shown as important for adjustment to secondary
progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Additionally it was found in this qualitative meta-analysis that adjustment to SPMS takes time4. Stress experience is a significant aspect affecting
health and happiness. There are factors that support health and influence the relationships between health, stress, and coping8. Health and illness are not static conditions; they are on a
dynamic continuum9.There is evidence that stress affects health in the general population: 43% of individuals report adverse health effects from stress and 75–90% of all doctor visits are
stress related. In addition, stress contributes to headaches, high blood pressure, diabetes, depression, anxiety, and many more health problems10,11,12. For persons with MS, emotional stress
plays an important role and can lead to common symptoms such as depression, fatigue, and cognitive changes13. It was shown that stress plays an important role not only on the onset of MS,
but also the frequency and intensity of stress and flair ups. Regarding depressive symptoms, it was shown that depression is part of the neurological symptoms of MS and that it is primed by
peripheral inflammation while an acute neuroinflammation is happening14. It was shown by a meta-analysis by Zhang et al.15 that people with MS had significantly increased blood oxitative
stress marker levels compared with healthy controls. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed an increased prevalence of depression and anxiety in MS16. For cognitive function in MS it
was shown that it is affected by the level of disability and fatigue. No significant effect on cognition was shown by depression17. Regarding fatigue in MS it was shown in a systematic
review that patient education programs, especially which were CBT (Cognitive Behavior Therapy) based, showed positive effects on reducing fatigue18. Oriented on literature about MS, we aimed
to investigate life changes/shifts since being diagnosed with MS and how people with MS deal with general stress, and whether general stress was related to disease related stress. METHOD We
used the reporting guideline COREQ19 to report our qualitative study and results (Supplementary Information). DESIGN A qualitative, descriptive design using a series of guided
semi-structured interviews was chosen to capture life changes due to MS and stress coping strategies among people with MS in Austria and the USA. The qualitative descriptive interview
methods were informed by the research of Hellige and Sandelowski. Hellige3 conducted interviews with people with MS; Sandelowski is an expert on how to conduct qualitative research for
quality of life and (chronic) illnesses20. SETTING In Austria, the sample was drawn from an inpatient neurorehabilitation clinic in Graz/Styria/Austria, which has a specialized
physical-therapy facility for MS inpatients. In the US the interviews were taken in an outpatient medical center in Boston. We selected Austria and the United States as study sites due to
their high MS prevalence rates, which are higher than 100 per 100,00021 and their predominantly Christian, high-income countries using the World Bank classification system. PARTICIPANTS
Inclusion criteria for participation were age, a clinical diagnosis of MS, and the cognitive and expressive language ability to participate in a qualitative interview. For age, we limited
participants to the age bracket of 18–57 to include only adults. We recruited 128 people with MS; more than two thirds of the participants had relapsing remitting MS and less than one third
had progressive MS. In Austria we invited all people eligible to participate in the study which resulted in a sample of 64 participants. The interviews in the United States were conducted
with outpatients at a multiple sclerosis clinic in Boston, MA. We wanted to have a comparable sample as in Austria and therefore included 64 participants from the US to our study. In Table 1
an overview of the sample demographics can be seen. DATA COLLECTION In Austria and the US, the same female interviewer, the primary investigator, who is experienced in qualitative research,
conducted all interviews, with those in Austria conducted in German and interviews in the United States conducted in English. The interview questions were carefully translated and back
translated by independent parties into English for the US leg of interviews. In in-person interviews ranging from 20 to 40 min, participants with MS responded to open-ended semi-structured
questions allowing for the possibility of multiple answers to each question and allowed interviewees to articulate their perceptions and experiences freely and spontaneously to more deeply
understand experiences of change after a diagnosis of MS, experiences of living with MS, and ways of coping with stress. The questions were: ‘Which changes in your life have you perceived
since you were diagnosed with MS?’, ‘Please describe your most significant experiences resulting from MS’ and “How do you cope with stress?’. We had no dropouts during the interviews.
Interviews were audio taped and transcribed verbatim for analysis. They were conducted using an interview guide that was checked within the research group and the questions are cited in the
paper. No field notes were taken. No repeat interviews were carried out. No transcripts were returned or discussed with participants. No one else was present in the room besides the
participants and researcher during the interviews. The study participant and the interviewer had no relationship established prior to study commencement and participants knew about the
purpose of the study and the personal interest of the researcher in MS. No one refused to participate. DATA ANALYSIS We applied convenience sampling. We started with data analysis after the
interviews in Austria were conducted and can confirm that we reached data saturation because the same themes were reoccurring. We augmented the study with including a sample of 64 interviews
from the US. Including and analyzing our additional 64 US interviews allowed us to generalize our findings to a broader population. We confirm that research including all methods were
performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Trustworthiness of the data can be granted. Due to privacy protection of the participants, it was promised that their
full-length interviews would not be published as these were open ended interviews and many things were shared. The interviews were coded and analyzed by the female principal investigator,
who is a sociologist and psychologist trained in qualitative research, who was in training for her PhD at the time of the interviews. A German speaking medical doctor, but English as native
language and trained in conducting research, reviewed the transcripts and verified the translations in Boston prior to starting the interviews. The software MAXQDA23 was used to code the
data. We used Grounded Theory24 as the theoretical frame of our research; Thematic Analysis26 was our specific method. We used an inductive, descriptive approach called thematic analysis for
data analysis24,25,26 whereby transcripts were coded in order to develop conceptual categories. After reading the transcripts in their entirety, we grouped statements dealing with similar
topics in a category and refined them into an over-arching theme and subthemes. We present participant quotes with the interview number, participant sex, and participant nation in
parentheses; for example, ‘I34, M, U.S.’ identifies a quote from Interview 34, in which the participant was male in the United States. Categories are supported by participant quotes.
Transcripts and results were not shared and discussed with participants. No feedback was given. Regarding a description of diverse cases opposing interview quotes are presented in the
findings. In the findings, we also present a table with a coding/category tree. ETHICAL APPROVAL In Austria and the US, the Ethics Commission of the associated medical center in Graz/Austria
respectively the Institutional Review board (IRB) of the Beth Israel Medical Center, a Teaching Hospital of the Harvard Medical School in Boston/US, approved the study and interviews and
consent forms. We provided participants with both written information and an oral explanation of the study and qualitative interviews and obtained their signed consent22. We determined their
cognitive and language ability by having them sign the consent. See Table 1 for the demographics of the participants. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration
of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University Graz/Austria in 2010 and the IRB in Boston/US in 2013. CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE All interviewees gave
written consent to participate in the study and the interviews, the study was IRB approved in Austria and the US. FINDINGS Findings revealed two overarching themes (l) life shifts through MS
and (2) dealing with stress. Table 2 gives an overview of the detailed qualitative results, which are described in the following: LIFE SHIFTS THROUGH MS We were interested in life with MS,
specifically what changed most notably, and what experiences were significant as a result of MS. The theme, life shifts through MS, resulted as the first two questions, which had similar
emergent themes, were analyzed together. The overarching theme under which the other subthemes fall is _experiencing limitations_. Within _experiencing limitations,_ participants described
changes in _emotions, work, social interactions and lifestyle, and physical status_. Below are participant quotes for the identified theme and subthemes: _Experiencing limitations_ described
constraints through MS. It included statements such as ‘I feel like I've slowed down. The fatigue has made me not be able to do as much as I would like to do. I'm just much more
aware of taking care of myself and what can I do to myself and doing what I can to make sure that I don't have stress, taking care of myself.’ (I32, F, US). Someone else stated ‘That I
am not that mobile anymore. That I can’t do certain things anymore (I60, F, AUT). Another one expressed ‘Lack of being able to do things I wanna do. I can’t see very well, I can’t drive any
more, I can’t read things like I used to—has to be read to me or I have the letters enlarged, so that I can read them. Cook: I can’t follow a recipe, I just through things together. (I50, F,
US). One person stated ‘I did not have negative experience with MS. Everyone who knows me doesn’t believe it (I49, F, AT). _Emotional changes_: This sub-theme described what changed
emotionally for participants since they were diagnosed MS. This included statements such as ‘…then I get nervous, I panic (I08, M, AT) and ‘I guess, whatever is happening during the flare up
symptoms. And that brings to the surface uncertainty about the disease. Most notably, I couldn't write and when I wrote, it was like a child. And it was very uncertain at that time. I
didn't know, is it gonna be better or not get better. It’s always around flare ups. Maybe realizing once again, how uncertain everything is. It could change every moment.’ (I23, M, US).
Another one stated ‘The whole life changes with MS, now I am also depressed from time to time’ (I38, F, AT). _Changes in work_: This subtheme summarized what people expressed about their
work adaptions. Answers in this subtheme included statements such as ‘The job, that's the biggest one. The fact that I had to stop working. That's the biggest one. The fact that I
couldn't do the job any more is still very hard for me.’ (I65, F, US). Another participant stated: ‘My lack of being able to work as hard as I used to. Sometimes I just get frustrated
because I can't go as fast or do as much as I used to. I don't have the ability to do what I used to do.’ (I59, M, US). Another one stated'. Again, I had to choose a different
career path (I10, F, US). _Changes in social interaction and lifestyle:_ This subtheme described what social changes in their interactions and their whole life with MS were reported. One
participant stated: ‘I'm definitely less social than I used to be. It feels unpredictable to make plans with other people because often I feel very tired. And it just became very
frustrating that you have to cancel plans, so I avoid making plans.’ (I43, F, US). Another stated: ‘You are not being accepted anymore. My circle of friends has changed. When you can't
participate anymore, they leave you. Healthy people can't accept your situation even if they try. Other people with MS can do that.’ (I52, M, AT). Another person stated ‘my social
environment does not react at all because they don’t know what that is. But many react with Oh, Oh, …that scares me (I01, M, AT). Another one stated ‘That I had good friends which are not
really good friends. But I also won new friends; (I25, F, AT). Another one stated ‘my inner family circle (children, husband) were very scared at the beginning, but talking about it helped.
My husband got more supportive (I41, F, AT). Another one said ‘my amount of physical employment changes. I have more leisure time, we changed our house building plans, I changed my nutrition
and I think about physical activity (I54, F, AT). Another person said ‘Changed my whole lifestyle. Everything fun I can’t do anymore, especially Sports. Family became more important,
because they try to support me. Quality of Life got much worse.’ (I64, M, AT). _Physical changes_: The sub-theme _physical changes_ was defined by physical transformations expressed due to
MS. It included statements such as ‘I am not as active physically. I am still as active mentally, maybe even more, because I'm determined.’ (I10, F, US). Another participant stated:
‘Physically it made me weaker but mentally it made me stronger. I found my voice, it's weird how it happened, but I really did’ (I14, M, US). Another statement was ‘Do more exercises,
probably more knowledge of the disease. And do more research. Read of new medication, studies.’ (I02,M, US). Another one stated ‘Not being able to walk. I keep a cane at my leg sometimes to
be able to walk. Sometimes I have no strength in my leg. (I02.M,US). Another person stated ‘I have to be careful when I walk downstairs, I get fatigue, I have to stop and sit, rest’ (I38, M,
US). _Medical context_ includes experiences made with medical personnel or with medication. One statement of this category is ‘(I had) negative experience with nurses in the hospital. They
treat you as if you were only a number …and the way they treat people … very shocking (I12, F, AT). Another one stated ‘I was on (medication) Copaxone, then I was switched over to medication
Tecfidera. I am really happy not taking Copaxone anymore. The shots made me very emotional. And having bruises. People could actually see about that, made me very sad.’ (I15, F, US).
Another one stated ‘I am just more aware towards the end of the week. As I inject Thursday night, you know my Fridays keeping them a little more low, sort of low key, in sort of managing the
side effects of the medication, which I continue to have. Headaches and flu like symptoms are manageable with Advil but I also try to keep my activity level at a more manageable level on
towards the end of the week, following the injections.’ (I34, F, US). Another one stated ‘It was the first medication, that didn’t agree with me. I felt how it is to not have your ability to
move, like it does affect your legs in weird ways and that was a little scary. But changing the medication, that helped.’ (I39. F, US). MANAGING GENERAL STRESS WHEN HAVING MS We identified
eight different categories for coping with general stress. They were further categorized as active and passive coping. Active coping included both, strategies and activities, to cope with
general stress. ACTIVE COPING WITH STRESS Active Coping included active stress coping strategies and active coping activities. Active Coping was defined as self-initiated effort to reduce
triggering circumstances or exposure to environments that were difficult. _Active stress coping strategies_ were defined as all activities that help dealing with stress actively, by using
strategies that were helpful in the past and will therefore be used again_:_ one participant explained the importance of planning: ‘Making a plan, having things written down so that I know
what I'm doing. I sort of take a step back and write down what's happening and how to deal with it.’ (I40, F, US). Another participant stated: ‘The best way that I can. Honestly, I
pretty much stay quiet, stay calm and do my own things. If I wanna go for a walk or take a drive somewhere, I do that. I just try to separate myself from what the problems are. Try not to
get overexcited about things, because stuff can always be fixed.’ (I27, M, US). Another one expressed ‘Very well. I guess I know what’s gonna happen and I realized that fact and I accept it
(I07, M, US). Another one stated ‘I try to just think about it, let it go, try to think there is something better than what I’m stressing out about. Try to figure out how to correct what’s
stressing me out. It’s a hard one (the question). (I59, M, US). _Active stress coping activities_ is a subcategory of active stress coping strategies, and they overlap in many cases. They
were defined as activities that someone performs to reduce stress. Answers in this category include statements such as ‘I write a lot, I create on so many levels, I paint, I sculpt, I have
friends to talk to.’ (I14, M, US), or ‘I try to schedule times with friends for a walk or dinner. I'm in a group of friends reading books and we meet every 2 months.’ (I25, F, US).
Another one stated ‘So I just got another dog, so I have two little dogs and they help, unconditional love. I go to the beach. I love the beach, just the sound of the ocean and I watch TV.
(I61, F, US). PASSIVE COPING WITH STRESS Passive Coping was defined as having no positive stress coping strategy or activity in place at all. We identified several passive coping themes;
these included: try to avoid stress, no strategies, ignoring stress, emotional stress reaction, physical stress reaction, and lifestyle reactions. _Try to avoid stress_: This category was
defined by using no strategies to deal with stress, other than trying to avoid triggers that lead to stress. One participant stated: `I avoid stress as much as possible and try to stop it
from happening' (I10, F, AT). Another participant said: ‘I just bottle it in and it comes out to a later time. I was always like that.’ (I05, M, US). Another one said ‘I try to avoid
stress’ (I38, F, AT). _No strategies_: This category was defined by having a lack of ideas of how to deal with stress. One participant stated `I always try to say it’s gonna be ok, it’s
gonna be ok, but in the back of my mind I'm wondering if it's really going to be ok. I tend to overthink things.' (I13, F, US). Another one said ’(P speaks rapidly and loud) I
don’t, I don’t, I really have a hard time dealing with that, I fall apart. (I01,F, US). Another one expressed ‘but I have no strategies at the moment, to deal with stress’. (I28, F, AT).
_Ignoring stress_: Ignoring stress was defined to consciously try to ignore the stress while _try to avoid stress_ describes that no strategies were used to deal with stress other than to
avoid dealing with it. One participant stated: `I try to relax and ignore it. Whatever stresses me out I try to ignore it.' (I42, M, US). Another person stated ‘I try to ignore stress,
although for work it does not always work, as everything has to be completed on time’ (I09, M, AT). STRESS REACTIONS _Emotional stress reactions_ were defined as emotional reaction as a
result of being stressed out. It included for example statements such as ‘Stress is like poison for me. I get nervous, insecure.’ (I27, M, AT). Another person expressed ‘then I fall into my
old pattern again, telling myself that I have to do everything on my own, that I can’t accept help’ (I24, F, AT). Another person said ‘I put lots of pressure on myself. It is less stress
from the outside, more my own expectations from myself’ (I07, M, AT). _Physical stress reactions_ were defined as how someone’s body reacts to stressors. This category included statements
such as ‘I don't like stress, it makes me not feel very good, I get symptoms: numbness, tingling, I can't walk right.' (I52, F, US). Another one stated ‘I feel physically
immediately worse’ (I56, F, AT). _Lifestyle reactions_ describe how people reacted to stress in their lifestyle, e.g. drinking alcohol, smoking or how they changed their lifestyle
(e.g.nutrition, sleep). It included statements such as ‘Ahm, ahm, marijuana, I do tend to drink a little bit, I spend money, I eat.’ (I12, M, US). Another person stated ‘I don’t take
everything that serious. I don’t have to be everywhere anymore. When I am on vacation, I don’t have to visit every sight around there. We have been everywhere before, now we have children
and that is important’ (I09, M, AT). Another one said ‘I breathe, count to 10 and maybe smoke cigarettes’ (I39, F, US). DISCUSSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first qualitative
study assessing life experiences with MS in such a large sample size using qualitative semi-structured open-ended questions. The aim of our study was to dive deeper into the meaning of
having to live with MS, and what changes and experiences formed the life of people with MS. Hellige27 talked to 18 people with progressive MS in 2002 and found that life changes over time
happen to people with MS, which are demanding and challenging (for the present and the future). We interviewed 128 people with MS and found explicit changes in life (so called life shifts),
which confirmed Hellige findings, and could specify that these took place in six areas, namely ‘experiencing limitations’, ‘emotional changes’, ‘changes with work’, ‘changes in social
interaction’, ‘physical changes’, ‘changes in the medical context’ (see results section for more detail). We decided to discuss the three areas ‘changes in ‘emotions’, ‘work’, ‘medical
context’ in more detail, as we could add additional findings to current research on these topics. In addition, we could show in our results ways how people with MS cope with their lives when
dealing with general stress and we will discuss possible future directions based on these results. LIFE SHIFTS THROUGH MS EMOTIONAL Literature, especially by Kalb28, dealt with the
psychological impact of MS, when cognitive changes take place in MS or when relapses happen. The author described that acute relapse of MS are experienced as crises including grief, anxiety,
anger, and guilt. In recent literature15,16 an increased prevalence of depression and anxiety in MS could be found. Our results showed that emotional reactions and anxiety were expressed
due to a sudden physical change during for example experiences of MS symptoms. As was shown by Dehghani et al.29, the maintenance of emotional balance, acceptance of the disease and
self-regulation are favorable factors for coping with MS. Our results as well show that emotional reactions related to general stress were expressed frequently. A new result we could add to
literature is that emotional reactions to general stress seem to be a way to cope in persons with MS. WORK The authors Beier et al.30 showed that the factor of employment status causes
stress in persons with MS. Dortsyn et al.31 found in their meta-analysis that employed people with MS reported significantly greater quality of life and mood, cited fewer work and MS
difficulties and were more likely to adopt problem-focused coping strategies. In their meta-analysis Gerhard et al.32 recommend that work interventions for people with MS should help be
aimed at enabling them to remain in workforce and accommodate and facilitate functional independence. In our study, changes in work were reported frequently as a (negative) life shift due to
MS. The fear of losing work respectively structure was expressed often. We want to add to literature that people with MS suffered due to the loss of work and structure. They were willing to
work (but not the full amount of time was possible). Diminished self-worth and negative coping were expressed frequently in this context. CHANGES IN THE MEDICAL CONTEXT Wagner et al.33
showed that the growing number of people with a major chronic illness face many obstacles in coping with their condition, also within the health care system. Medical care often does not meet
their needs for effective clinical management, psychological support, and information. Particularly poor communication with healthcare professionals and medication was reported frequently
in our interviews with people with MS. STRESS Our results add new insights to the understanding general stress coping strategies of people with MS. Passive coping strategies were expressed
frequently. Emotional, physical and lifestyle reactions to general stress were identified as ways to cope with stress for persons with MS. IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERVENTION Our research could be
used to develop interventions where the areas _emotional, work, social interaction and lifestyle, physical aspects of life and the medical context_ could be focused on_._ Sanchez et al.34
identified needs and demands of people with MS as well. They could show the importance of empowering people with MS. We recommend that people with MS as well as their professional and
personal support persons should be included in developing interventions as well as trainings focusing on these interventions2,7. Rintell et al. could show the importance of including family
in intervention planning for MS and the early wish of Persons with MS to get mental health support. In our interviews more support from family, friends and medical personnel was expressed
frequently. Our findings should be used for psychoeducational trainings about stress and coping with life shifts, accepting and managing limitations35,36. Support should also be focused on
planning goals, identifying meaning in life, as well as accentuating cultural and personal strengths. Lastly, we recommend addressing the meaning of passive coping strategies and their
importance in the context of emotion regulation. Emotional stress reactions should be addressed in MS. Learning about emotion regulation and its consequences should be the goal when planning
effective and healthy life style, also to improve quality of life, as well stated by Phillips et al.37. STUDY LIMITATIONS A potential source of bias is the recruitment strategy (inpatients
in Austria vs. outpatients in the US), which differed for practical reasons. Inpatient rehabilitation centers are not offered in a similar amount in the US as in Austria due to differences
in the social security system. In addition, we sampled more participants than we would have needed to reach data saturation. However, out of respect towards invited MS patients, we wanted to
give all of them interested in sharing their thoughts the opportunity to do so. Because we collected data in only two settings, we cannot claim that our findings generalize to the whole MS
population. Although, the large sample size does add to the rigor of the findings. A limitation of the data analysis is that there was only one person coding the interviews and analyzing the
data. We did not directly ask participants about their quality of life and the relationship between quality of life and other concepts such as coping with stress due to limitations of time
(how long study participants would be ok to be interviewed. We did not want to exceed 50 min). It will be important for these two topics to be addressed in future research. We also did not
specifically address early onset MS and are aware that this type of MS carries its own specific challenges and burdens. Future research should focus on how challenges with the onset of MS
are perceived and how experiences evolve over the lifespan, taking into consideration factors such as duration of disease, level of impairment, marital status, having children, job
satisfaction, and communication styles, among others. We did not set a focus on healthcare providers and their needs. This should be the goal for future research in this area—focusing on
challenges and needs of healthcare workers. CONCLUSION Based on our findings, we recommend developing psychological and social interventions in three core areas for the MS population: (1)
dealing with life changes and significant experiences with MS, (2) focusing on three out of many areas detected where life shifts took place: emotional, work and aspects in the medical
context of persons with MS. (3) focusing on active coping with stress as goal for people with MS, within their social and medical interactions, and making passive strategies/coping and
emotion regulation a subject of discussion. DATA AVAILABILITY Interview data was collected for the PIs dissertation. Contact the PI for more information. REFERENCES * Reynolds, F. &
Prior, S. ‘Sticking jewels in your life’: Exploring women’s strategies for negotiating an acceptable quality of life with multiple sclerosis. _Qual. Health Res._ 13(9), 1225–1251 (2003).
Article PubMed Google Scholar * Rintell, D. J., Frankel, D., Minden, S. L. & Glanz, B. I. Patients’ perspectives on quality of mental health care for people with MS. _Gen. Hosp.
Psychiatry_ 34(6), 604–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.04.001 (2012). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Hellige, B. _Balanceakt Multiple Sklerose: Leben und Pflege bei
Chronischer Krankheit_ (Kohlhammer, 2002). Google Scholar * Meek, C., Topcu, G., Moghaddam, N. & das Nair, R. Experiences of adjustment to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: A
meta-ethnographic systematic review. _Disabil. Rehabil._ 43(22), 3135–3146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1734105 (2021). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Keramat Kar, M.,
Whitehead, L. & Smith, C. M. Characteristics and correlates of coping with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. _Disabil. Rehabil._ 41(3), 250–264.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1387295 (2019). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Boeije, H. R., Duijnstee, M. S. H., Grypdonck, M. H. F. & Pool, A. Encountering the downward
phase: Biographical work in people with multiple sclerosis living at home. _Soc. Sci. Med. 1982_ 55(6), 881–893 (2002). Google Scholar * Rintell, D. & Melito, R. ‘Her illness is a
project we can work on together’: Developing a collaborative family-centered intervention model for newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis. _Int. J. MS Care_ 15(3), 130–136.
https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2012-022 (2013). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Diener, E., Pressman, S. D., Hunter, J. & Delgadillo-Chase, D. If, why, and when
subjective well-being influences health, and future needed research. _Appl. Psychol. Health Well-Being_ 9(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12090 (2017). Article PubMed Google
Scholar * Egger, J. W. Das biopsychosoziale Krankheitsmodell. _Psychol. Med._ 2, 3–12 (2005). Google Scholar * Ivey, A. E., Ivey, M. B. & Zalaquett, C. P. _Intentional Interviewing and
Counseling: Facilitating Client Development in a Multicultural Society_ (Cengage Learning, 2016). Google Scholar * Lehavot, K. _et al._ Do trauma type, stressful life events, and social
support explain women veterans’ high prevalence of PTSD?. _Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol._ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1550-x (2018). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google
Scholar * Virtanen, M. _et al._ Long working hours, anthropometry, lung function, blood pressure and blood-based biomarkers: Cross-sectional findings from the CONSTANCES study. _J.
Epidemiol. Community Health_ https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-210943 (2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Kalb, R. _“Chapter 2: The Emotional and Social Impact of Cognitive Changes”,
in Multiple Sclerosis: Understanding the Cognitive Challenges_ (Demos Medical Pub, 2006). Google Scholar * Kallaur, A. P. _et al._ Immune-inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress
biomarkers of depression symptoms in subjects with multiple sclerosis: Increased peripheral inflammation but less acute neuroinflammation. _Mol. Neurobiol._ 53(8), 5191–5202.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9443-4 (2016). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Zhang, S.-Y., Gui, L.-N., Liu, Y.-Y., Shi, S. & Cheng, Y. Oxidative stress marker aberrations in
multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis study. _Front. Neurosci._ 14, 823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00823 (2020). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Boeschoten, R. E.
_et al._ Prevalence of depression and anxiety in Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. _J. Neurol. Sci._ 372, 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.11.067 (2017).
Article PubMed Google Scholar * Yigit, P., Acikgoz, A., Mehdiyev, Z., Dayi, A. & Ozakbas, S. The relationship between cognition, depression, fatigue, and disability in patients with
multiple sclerosis. _Ir. J. Med. Sci._ 190(3), 1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02377-2 (2021). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Wendebourg, M. J. _et al._ Patient education
for people with multiple sclerosis-associated fatigue: A systematic review. _PLoS One_ 12(3), e0173025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173025 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed
Central Google Scholar * Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations | The EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/srqr/.
Accessed 28 Jul 2021. * Sandelowski, M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. _Res. Nurs. Health_ 33(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362 (2009). Article Google
Scholar * Browne, P. _et al._ Atlas of Multiple Sclerosis 2013: A growing global problem with widespread inequity. _Neurology_ 83(11), 1022–1024.
https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000768 (2014). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Lex, H. _et al._ Social-emotional aspects of quality of life in multiple sclerosis.
_Psychol. Health Med._ 23(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1385818 (2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar * VERBI. Qualitative Analysis Software—Powerful and Easy-to-use.
_MAXQDA—The Art of Data Analysis_, 2001. https://www.maxqda.com/qualitative-analysis-software. Accessed 5 Dec 2018. * Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. _The Discovery of Grounded Theory:
Strategies for Qualitative Research_ (Aldine Publ, 1977). Google Scholar * Fortin, M. _et al._ Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary
health care. _BMC Health Serv. Res._ 13(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-132 (2013). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic
analysis in psychology. _Qual. Res. Psychol._ 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa (2006). Article Google Scholar * Hellige, B. Living with a chronic progressive form
of multiple sclerosis—a balance act. _Pflege_ 15(6), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302.15.6.284 (2002). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Kalb, R. The emotional and psychological
impact of multiple sclerosis relapses. _J. Neurol. Sci._ 256(Suppl 1), S29-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.061 (2007). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Dehghani, A., Keshavarzi,
A., Jahromi, M. F., Shahsavari Isfahani, S. & Keshavarzi, S. Concept analysis of coping with multiple sclerosis. _Int. J. Nurs. Sci._ 5(2), 168–173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.04.009 (2018). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Beier, M. _et al._ Relationship of perceived stress and employment status in
individuals with multiple sclerosis. _Work Read. Mass_ 62(2), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-192859 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Dorstyn, D. S., Roberts, R. M., Murphy, G. &
Haub, R. Employment and multiple sclerosis: A meta-analytic review of psychological correlates. _J. Health Psychol._ 24(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317691587 (2019). Article
PubMed Google Scholar * Gerhard, L., Dorstyn, D. S., Murphy, G. & Roberts, R. M. Neurological, physical and sociodemographic correlates of employment in multiple sclerosis: A
meta-analysis. _J. Health Psychol._ 25(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318755262 (2020). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Wagner, E. H. _et al._ Improving chronic illness care:
Translating evidence into action. _Health Aff. (Millwood)_ 20(6), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 (2001). Article CAS Google Scholar * Robles-Sanchez, M.-A. _et al._ An
expert patient program as a tool to empower people with multiple sclerosis. _J. Neurosci. Nurs. J. Am. Assoc. Neurosci. Nurses._ 52(4), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000514
(2020). Article Google Scholar * Whittemore, R. & Dixon, J. Chronic illness: The process of integration. _J. Clin. Nurs._ 17, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02244.x
(2008). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Senders, A., Sando, K., Wahbeh, H., Peterson Hiller, A. & Shinto, L. Managing psychological stress in the multiple sclerosis
medical visit: Patient perspectives and unmet needs. _J. Health Psychol._ 21(8), 1676–1687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314562084 (2016). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Phillips, L.
H. _et al._ Difficulties with emotion regulation in multiple sclerosis: Links to executive function, mood, and quality of life. _J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol._ 36(8), 831–842.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2014.946891 (2014). Article PubMed Google Scholar Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank study participants for their enthusiastic support of this
study. We would like to thankKatherine G. Warthen, Dr. Alexandra L. Terrill, Dr. Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, and Dr. Lyndsey Miller for feedback and comments on this manuscript, as well as
Dr. Peter Griesshofer, Dr. Revere Kinkel, and Dr. Marion Stein, for local support at the clinics. FUNDING This work was funded by the Austrian Agency for International Cooperation in
Education and Research (OEAD) through its Marietta Blau scholarship. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 383 Colorow Drive, Salt Lake
City, UT, 84108, USA Heidemarie Lex * OTR/L, FAOTA, University of Utah College of Occupational and Recreational Therapies, Salt Lake City, USA Pollie Price * FAAN, University of California
at Los Angeles College of Nursing, Los Angeles, USA Lauren Clark Authors * Heidemarie Lex View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Pollie Price
View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Lauren Clark View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
CONTRIBUTIONS Each author has provided adequate intellectual contribution. The first author conducted the interviews, all wrote the main manuscript text to equal parts. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Correspondence to Heidemarie Lex. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains
neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This
article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as
you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party
material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the
article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the
copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Lex, H., Price, P. &
Clark, L. Qualitative study identifies life shifts and stress coping strategies in people with multiple sclerosis. _Sci Rep_ 12, 6536 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10267-z
Download citation * Received: 30 November 2021 * Accepted: 30 March 2022 * Published: 20 April 2022 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10267-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the
following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer
Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative