ABSTRACT Microbialites and peloids are commonly associated throughout the geologic record. Proterozoic carbonate megafacies are composed predominantly of micritic and peloidal limestones

often interbedded with stromatolitic textures. The association is also common throughout carbonate ramps and platforms during the Phanerozoic. Recent investigations reveal that Hamelin Pool,

located in Shark Bay, Western Australia, is a microbial carbonate factory that provides a modern analog for the microbialite-micritic sediment facies associations that are so prevalent in

the geologic record. Hamelin Pool contains the largest known living marine stromatolite system in the world. Although best known for the constructive microbial processes that lead to

release irregular peloidal grains. In addition, over 20 km2 of gelatinous microbial mats, with thin brittle layers of micrite, colonize subtidal pavements. When these gelatinous mats erode,

the micritic layers break down to form platey, micritic intraclasts with irregular boundaries. Together, the irregular micritic grains from pustular sheet mats and gelatinous pavement mats

make up nearly 26% of the total sediment in the pool, plausibly producing ~ 24,000 metric tons of microbial sediment per year. As such, Hamelin Pool can be seen as a microbial carbonate

factory, with construction by lithifying microbial mats forming microbialites, and erosion and degradation of weakly lithified microbial mats resulting in extensive production of sand-sized

micritic sediments. Insight from these modern examples may have direct applicability for recognition of sedimentary deposits of microbial origin in the geologic record. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING

VIEWED BY OTHERS JURASSIC PALEOSURFACES WITH FECAL MOUNDS REVEAL THE LAST SUPPER OF ARENICOLID WORMS Article Open access 06 January 2024 SEDIMENTARY STRUCTURES OF MICROBIAL CARBONATES IN

THE FOURTH MEMBER OF THE MIDDLE TRIASSIC LEIKOUPO FORMATION, WESTERN SICHUAN BASIN, CHINA Article Open access 09 February 2023 MICROBIAL BIOSIGNATURE PRESERVATION IN CARBONATED SERPENTINE

FROM THE SAMAIL OPHIOLITE, OMAN Article Open access 07 October 2022 INTRODUCTION Hamelin Pool, located in Shark Bay, Western Australia is home to the world’s most extensive assemblage of

living microbialites1,2. Microbialites are organosedimentary deposits that have accreted as a result of a benthic microbial community trapping and binding detrital sediment and/or forming

the locus of mineral precipitation3. As the first macroscopic fossil evidence of life on the planet, microbialites have been dated to ages greater than three billion years4,5,6,7,8, making

living structures, such as those in Hamelin Pool, a critical analog for interpretation of ancient structures. Although Hamelin Pool is best known for its classic microbialite buildups, often

referred to as stromatolites, a recent mapping project2 revealed that stromatolites buildups cover less than 2% of the total area of the pool. Weakly-lithifying microbial sheet mats in the

upper intertidal zone make up ~ 3% of the total Hamelin Pool area and subtidal pavements account for ~ 9% of the Hamelin lithofacies. The bulk of Hamelin Pool, ~ 86% of the total area,

consists of peloid-dominated carbonate sediments. Throughout the geologic record, microbialites and peloids are commonly associated in depositional settings. Some examples include a Late

Neoproterozoic age formation in the Mackenzie Mountains of northwestern Canada, where cap carbonates, peloidal grains, and stromatolites are intimately associated9; a late Proterozoic-early

Cambrian age formation in Namibia, where stromatolites and thrombolites are in close association with peloid grainstone facies10,11,12; a Cambrian age formation in the Great Basin in

California/Nevada, where thrombolites are found intermingled with peloid-rich grainstones13,14 (Supplemental Fig. S1); a Devonian age formation in the Canning Basin where stromatolites and

peloidal limestones commonly occur together15; and a Lower Cretaceous formation, where microbialite-peloid associations are common in both the Campos and Kwanza Basins16,17. Although a

microbial origin for stromatolites and other microbial buildups in these ancient examples is well established18,19,20,21, sources of the peloidal sediments are mostly not discussed. Results

from our recent mapping studies suggest that Hamelin Pool may be an ideal modern analog for microbialite-peloid associations that are prevalent throughout Earth history. In this paper, we

explore the role of benthic microbial communities as a prolific modern-day carbonate factory. In particular, we describe extensive microbial carbonate sediments within Hamelin Pool produced

through a previously little-studied erosional process that has led to the accumulation of sand-sized micritic grains that are associated with synchronous construction of stromatolites in

this world famous setting. BACKGROUND Hamelin Pool, located in Shark Bay, Western Australia, (Fig. 1a), is a restricted embayment about 800 km north of Perth, Western Australia. Hamelin Pool

covers roughly 1400 square kilometers and has 135 km of coastline, nearly all of which is dominated by microbial mats2. Hypersalinity22, large fluctuations in temperature, and frequent

subaerial exposure create a high-stress environment that is unfavorable for growth of macroalgae and other eukaryotic organisms (sensu23,24,25,26,27) allowing extensive microbial

development28. The classic models of Hamelin Pool recognize microbialites (historically termed ‘stromatolites’29,30 in a shore parallel facies band around the margin, subclassified by their

surface mats, which vary by location within the tidal zone (e.g.,1,22,29,30,31). These early studies recognized ‘pustular-mat stromatolites’ in upper intertidal zones, ‘smooth-mat

stromatolites’ in lower intertidal to shallow subtidal, and ‘colloform-mat stromatolites’ in subtidal zones (Fig. 1c). Recent studies by Suosaari et al.2,28 expanded upon this model to

differentiate between lithifying microbial mats that construct microbialites and non-lithifying to weakly-lithifying sheet mats that form broad, extensive accumulations in the upper

intertidal zone (Fig. 1c), commonly located in bights and embayments. Additional facies mapping by Suosaari et al.2 documented subtidal pavements forming 9% of the total area and commonly

coated with gelatinous microbial mats, and carbonate dominated sediments that make up 86% of the total area of Hamelin Pool. Peloids and irregular micritic grains were found to be the most

abundant component in Hamelin Pool sediments (Fig. 1b), and were common throughout all Provinces with the highest abundances in the southwestern region of the Pool (Nilemah, Booldah, and

southern Spaven Provinces (Supplemental Fig. S2). In the analysis of Hamelin Pool sediments published by Suosaari et al.2 two types of micritic grains were described as ‘peloids’: spherical

grains with distinct smooth edges and angular micritic grains with irregular edges. Together these micritic grains comprise approximately half of the sediment in Hamelin Pool, and are most

dominant in the southern and southeastern regions of the Pool (Supplemental Fig. S1). The spherical peloids, comprising about 21% of the sediment in Hamelin Pool, include coated grains,

micritized skeletal grains, and ooids, as described in previous studies22,32. Irregular micritic grains, which comprise ~ 26% of the sediment in Hamelin Pool and up to 80% of sediments in

the south and south east (Fig. 1a,b), are the focus of the present study. Results complement previous studies of Hamelin Pool stromatolites1,2,28,33,34,35, and document erosional and

constructional sedimentary processes, which together, constitute a modern carbonate factory that produces a microbialite-peloid facies association typical of the geologic record. RESULTS AND

DISCUSSION FORMATION OF IRREGULAR MICRITIC GRAINS Irregular micritic grains make up 26% of the total sediment facies in Hamelin Pool (Fig. 1b). Examination of petrographic thin sections

from microbial mats forming in the upper intertidal zone as pustular sheet mats and from subtidal gel mats forming on low-relief microbial pavement shed light on the formation of these

irregular micritic grains, as documented below. MICRITIC GRAINS FROM PUSTULAR SHEET MATS Weakly lithified pustular mat in the upper intertidal zone of Hamelin Pool (Fig. 2a,b) is

characterized by soft pustules of _Entophysalis major_, with clusters of _E_._ granulosa_ and distinctive tetrads of smaller colonial coccoid cyanobacteria, all embedded within a thick

matrix of exopolymeric substances (EPS) (Fig. 2c)28. Wet thin sections of pustular sheet mat and eroded pustules revealed an intimate relationship between _Entophysalis_ and micrite (Fig. 

3). The micrite originates as calcified _Entophysalis_, with dark inclusions within the micrite representing shriveled entombed cells. The mats are permineralized within the polysaccharide

envelopes (glycocalyx) that surround individual and groups of cells36,37,38,39,40. Calcification of the coccoid cyanobacterium _Entophysalis_ is evident in thin sections (Fig. 3d–f) stained

with crystal violet, showing cells being replaced with microcrystalline carbonate and forming large clots of micrite. Thus, the soft pustules of the sheet mats are being replaced by

authigenic carbonate. A one inch diameter core through pustular sheet mat (Fig. 4a) shows sediment comprised of abundant irregular micritic grains released from degrading _Entophysalis_ and

fresh foraminifera (Fig. 4b,c). The micritic grains formed within the pustules are easily recognized by their irregular shapes and clotted textures. Scouring wave action commonly rips up and

erodes the sheet mats22 and pustules in various stages of decomposition are found along the edges of the pool and across the shallow sea floor (Fig. 3a). MICRITIC GRAINS FROM GELATINOUS

PAVEMENT MATS Vast expanses of gelatinous microbial mats form on extensive subtidal pavements in the southwestern region of Hamelin Pool (Fig. 5a,b). These gelatinous mats are similar in

composition to the colloform and smooth mats of the stromatolites, as described by28, containing _Aphanothece_ sp., _Aphanocapsa_ sp., _Entophysalis_ and diatoms. The gel mats are also

characterized by microeukaryotes with pyrenoid structures (Fig. 5c,d). Thin laminae of micritic calcium carbonate are commonly found at the surface or within the gel mats (Figs. 5b, 6a).

These gelatinous mats with micritic laminae break down through the degradation of organic matter, or through erosional processes in high-energy environments. Abrasion of the gel mats exposes

the micritic crusts (Fig. 6b), which are subsequently eroded, forming platy fragments (Fig. 6c,d). Detached globules of gel, commonly with attached crusts, are typically seen along the

southwestern margin in various stages of decomposition across the seafloor (Fig. 6c). As the gelatinous material degrades, the micritic laminae break up into platy intraclasts. These

irregular micritic grains have jagged, uneven boundaries. In thin section, the micritic laminae show homogeneous to clotted micritic textures (Fig. 7a, b). In the south and southwestern

regions near well-documented accumulations of gel mats on subtidal low-relief microbial pavements2, irregular micritic grains can make up more than 75% of the total sediment (Figs. 1b, 7c,d,

Supplemental Fig. S1). PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES OF PRODUCTION Both pustular mats and gelatinous pavement mats appear to be prolific sources of irregular micritic grains. Rates of grain

production are difficult to estimate, and growth studies of the mats have not been conducted. To get a crude estimate of grain production, we made some back-of-the-envelope calculations.

Three samples of pustular mat from the southern embayment of Nilemah Province (Fig. 1a), each ~ 1 cm thick, covering areas of approximately 10 cm × 10 cm or 100 cm2, were dissolved in

bleach. Weights of sediment released from 100 cm2 of each sample ranged from 5 to 10 g. This gives a carbonate production of approximately 500–1000 g per square meter of surface mat. A

turnover time of 5 years for surface growth on pustular mats would give a production rate of ~ 100 to 200 g carbonate sediment per square meter of mat per year. Similarly, 1 cm2 of carbonate

crust from gel mat from the subtidal gelatinous mats of Booldah Province (Fig. 1a) weighs approximately 0.1 g. Thus, 1 m2 of gelatinous mat could contain 1000 g of carbonate crust. Again,

forming a new crust every five years, would yield a production rate similar to that of the pustular mats, of about 200 g carbonate per square meter of mat per year. These rough estimates of

rates of carbonate production by weakly lithified pustular and gel mats are similar in order of magnitude to carbonate production by calcareous algae in open marine environments, which are

estimated to range from 50 to 240 g m−2 year−1 in _Halimeda_ and _Padina_, respectively41. Based on these numbers, pustular and gel mats together are estimated to contribute up to 0.4 kg m−2

 year−1 of carbonate to Hamelin Pool, amounting to the addition of ~ 24,000 metric tons of microbially produced carbonate grains annually (based on 60 km2 of microbial mats and low-relief

microbial pavements mapped by2. MICROBIAL CARBONATE FACTORY Benthic carbonate production systems have been termed ‘carbonate factories’42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49. Schlager44 recognized three

main factories: the tropical factory, the cool water factory and the mud mound factory (Fig. 4a). We here propose a modification to the Schlager factory subdivision, suggesting a category of

‘microbial factory’, adding a subdivision of ‘microbialite-peloid factory’ to the previously defined ‘mud mound’ category. Rationale for this addition is based on our observations from

Hamelin Pool, applied to the geologic record, as discussed below. HAMELIN POOL AS A MODERN ANALOG Hamelin Pool can be considered as a modern analog for the microbialite-peloid facies

association that is common in the geologic record. Since the discovery of stromatolites in Hamelin Pool in 195430 the constructive microbial processes that lead to formation of these

microbialite structures have been extensively studied (e.g.,1,2,22,28,29,30,33,34,35,38,50,51,52,53,54 etc.). The microbial surface mats that generate the underlying stromatolite structures

produce exopolymeric substances (EPS), which enhance stability55 and promote micrite precipitation, leading to the upward growth of the structures56,57. In addition to trapping and binding

of carbonate sands by the microbial mats, stromatolite accretion in Hamelin Pool is accompanied by pervasive precipitation of microbial micrite28,33,54, often composing up to 85% of the

internal fabrics54. Integrated studies of surface mats and internal fabrics have indicated that the microbial composition of the surface mats is correlated to the microbialite

microstructures28. In addition to the construction of microbialite structures by lithifying microbial mats, the discussion of micritic sediments above, as illustrated in Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

and 7, indicates that erosion and degradation of unlithified microbial mats in Hamelin Pool leads to the extensive production and accumulation of peloids—sand-sized irregular micritic

grains. In the upper intertidal zone around the margin of Hamelin Pool, nearly 40 km2 of weakly lithified microbial pustular sheet (~ 3% total area of Hamelin Pool2), produce copious amounts

of micritic carbonate grains through the degradation and lithification of _Entophysalis_ cells. When these pustules erode and decay, the calcified microbes make a substantial contribution

to the sediments in the form of irregular micritic grains. In addition, over 20 km2 of gelatinous microbial mats with thin brittle layers of micrite colonize subtidal pavements (~ 1.5% total

area of Hamelin Pool2). When these mats erode and decay, the micritic layers break down to form micritic intraclasts. Together, these irregular micritic grains are the most common sediment

component in Hamelin Pool, making up nearly 26% of the sediments, followed by well-rounded peloids (~ 21%), Foraminifera (~ 17%), the bivalve _Fragum erugatum_ (~ 13.4%), quartz grains (~ 

11.8%), followed by gastropods, ooids/coated grains, and other sediments (~ 10%) (Fig. 1b). As such, Hamelin Pool is an effective microbial carbonate factory, with construction by lithifying

microbial mats forming microbialites and erosion and degradation of weakly lithified microbial mats simultaneously resulting in extensive production of sand-sized micritic sediments (Fig. 

8). Platform morphologies and sediment production rates associated with the microbialite-peloid carbonate factory are shown in Supplemental Fig. S3, updating the diagrams of Reijmer48 and

Schlager44. Recognition of a microbial carbonate factory in Hamelin Pool provides a basis for interpretation of the common association of microbialites and peloids in the geologic record.

RELEVANCE TO THE GEOLOGIC RECORD Understanding microbial processes of sedimentation in modern environments, as described above for Hamelin Pool, helps to interpret the geologic record. In

Hamelin Pool, the dominant lithofaces are sediments (86%), predominantly composed of irregular micritic grains as the dominant sediment component, whereas the microbialite facies covers a

much smaller area of the Pool (< 2%)2. This combination of abundant peloidal sediments and relatively low abundances of microbialite structures is a common association throughout the rock

record9,13,14,15,16,17,58,59,60; etc. The findings of this study may also provide insight into the origin of peloids in the geologic record that are not found in association with

microbialites, but are not identifiable as fecal pellets or other detrital grains derived from different and/or more distal sources (sensu61). In addition to the recognition of microbial

activity as an important source of peloidal grains, the identification of the type of microbe contributing to the formation of these micritic grains is significant. Of particular relevance

are calcifiying _Entophysalis,_ and an abundant microalga with pyrenoids. For the latter, it had been proposed that 10 μm microfossils preserved in the Belcher and Bitter Springs formations

might contain pyrenoids62. Not only are the microfossils in both the Belcher Supergroup (~ 2.0 Ga formation63 located in Hudson Bay, Canada), and the Bitter Springs (~ 800 Ma formation64

located in Central Australia) similar in appearance, both have facies associations consisting of stratiform and domal stromatolites, with accumulations of peloids, intraclasts, and/or

siliciclastic grains between structures18,62,65,66,67,68. Similar to many stromatolites in Hamelin Pool, which display micritic frameworks28,33, stromatolites in the Belcher Supergroup are

attributed to in situ permineralization of microbial mats rather than trapping and binding18. Significantly, an important bacterial microfossil identified in both the Belcher and Bitter

Springs formations is _Eoentophysalis_ sp.18,69, which is a probable precursor to modern _Entophysalis_ sp._,_ the microbe contributing to the formation of Hamelin Pool

stromatolites28,36,37, as well as and peloidal and intraclast sediments as described here (Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). In addition to the presence of _Entophysalis_, the presence of microalga

with pyrenoids in Hamelin Pool subtidal gel mats is also relevant to fossil structures. Dark inclusions observed in microfossils have been interpreted as pyrenoid structures and used as

criteria to identify eukaryotic cells62. Although these dark inclusions are present in microfossils observed in both the Bitter Springs formation and Belcher Supergroup, they have been

interpreted by some authors as degradational features of prokaryotes, such as _Entophysalis_18. In contrast, other studies suggested that these organelle-like bodies are comparable to

pyrenoids which occur in modern eukaryotic algae62 such as those observed in the intraclast-producing gel mats of Hamelin Pool. Our observations support the potential presence of eukaryotic

algae in microbialite-peloidal systems of the Precambrian. CONCLUSIONS Using Hamelin Pool as a modern analog to examine the significance and association of microbialites and peloids

throughout the geologic record, we propose that microbial systems are prolific carbonate factories. Construction by lithifying microbial mats forms microbialite buildups, while erosion of

weakly lithified microbial mats forms sand-sized micritic sediments, that can be lumped under the umbrella term ‘peloids’. Many Proterozoic carbonate megafacies are composed predominantly of

micritic and peloidal limestones interbedded with stromatolitic structures. This microbialite-peloid association is also common in Phanerozoic carbonate ramps and platforms. Although

microbial communities have long been recognized to form stromatolites and other buildups, the role of microbes in prolific production of sand-sized micritic grains has, until now, been

overlooked. METHODS FIELD STUDIES Fieldwork was conducted during three 2-month field seasons (March and April 2012–2014) using small boats. Samples were collected from non-lithifying sheet

mats in the upper intertidal zone of the Nilemah embayment (Nilemah Province), and from gel mats on the surface of low-relief microbial pavement in the shallow subtidal zone along the

southeast margin (Booldah Province). Sediment samples were collected throughout the pool. SEDIMENT ANALYSIS Point counting was conducted on photomicrographs of 152 thin sections of

unconsolidated sediments from Hamelin Pool taken using a petrographic microscope in plane-polarized and cross-polarized light. Photomicrographs were visualized in JMicroVision Image Analysis

Toolbox 1.2.7, and 300 randomly distributed points were counted on each slide. Results from this data set were originally reported in Suosaari et al.2 using seven categories including:

quartz, peloids and/or intraclasts, ooids and coated grains, bivalves, gastropods, foraminifera, and other. This study focuses on only the peloid data collected from that previous report and

investigates the peloids and intraclasts independently. MICROBIAL MAT ANALYSIS Samples were collected and maintained in Hamelin Pool seawater for immediate microscope analysis, with a

subset preserved on site with 2.5% glutaraldehyde or 4% formalin in filtered seawater. Preserved samples were kept chilled and in the dark. Light micrographs were taken on an Olympus BX51

fluorescence microscope with a Micropublisher Camera (Q Imaging, Surry BC)70. Microbial mat samples used in this study included pustular mat collected from a sheet mat located in the

intertidal zone in the Nilemah Province, and a gel mat collected from the surface of a low-relief microbial pavement in the subtidal zone in the Booldah Province. Microbial mat samples were

embedded in epoxy following Nye et al.71 which preserves both biological and mineral material, and the embedded material was made into petrographic thin sections. These sections were stained

with crystal violet to highlight organics and examined using a petrographic microscope. For analysis using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), microbial mat samples were prepared using

a modification of the method in 68 from samples stored in 2.5% glutaraldehyde. Once in the lab, the samples were cut into smaller pieces (~ 1 mm cubes) and initially rinsed in filtered

seawater, then post-fixed for 1 h with 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.5 M sodium acetate. Following 3 × rinse with 0.5 M sodium acetate buffer, the mat samples were incubated overnight in an

aqueous solution of 0.5% uranyl acetate. The samples were then dehydrated in an ethanol series (50, 70, 90, 95, and 100%), followed by propylene oxide treatment (first straight, then 1:1

with Spurr’s low viscosity embedding medium) and embedded in Spurr's. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (1%) and observed on a JEOL 1210 TEM (JEOL,

Peabody MA) at 80 kV equipped with an ORCA HR digital camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater NJ). REFERENCES * Jahnert, R. J. & Collins, L. B. Characteristics, distribution and morphogenesis of

subtidal microbial systems in Shark Bay, Australia. _Mar. Geol._ 303–306, 115–136 (2012). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Suosaari, E. P. _et al._ Stromatolite provinces of Hamelin

pool: Physiographic controls on stromatolites and associated lithofacies. _J. Sediment. Res._ 89, 207–226 (2019). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Burne, R. V. & Moore, L. S.

Microbialites: Organosedimentary deposits of benthic microbial communities. _Palaios_ 2, 241–254 (1987). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Walter, M. R., Buick, R. & Dunlop, J. S. R.

Stromatolites 3400–3500 Myr old from the North Pole area, Western Australia. _Nature_ 284, 443–445 (1980). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Lowe, D. R. Stromatolites 3,400-Myr old from the

Archean of Western Australia. _Nature_ 284, 441–443 (1980). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Hofmann, H. J., Grey, K., Hickman, A. H. & Thorpe, R. I. Origin of 3.45 Ga coniform

stromatolites in Warrawoona Group, Western Australia. _GSA Bull._ 111, 1256–1262 (1999). Article  Google Scholar  * Allwood, A. C., Walter, M. R., Kamber, B. S., Marshall, C. P. & Burch,

I. W. Stromatolite reef from the Early Archaean era of Australia. _Nature_ 441, 714–718 (2006). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Nutman, P. A., Bennett, V. C., Friend, C. R. L.,

Van Kranendonk, M. J. & Chivas, A. Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial

structures microbial structures. _Nature_ 537, 535–538 (2016). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * James, N. P., Narbonne, G. M. & Kyser, T. K. Late Neoproterozoic cap

carbonates: Mackenzie mountains, northwestern Canada: Precipitation and global glacial meltdown. _Can. J. Earth Sci._ 38, 1229–1262 (2001). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Grotzinger,

J., Adams, E. W. & Schröder, S. Microbial-metazoan reefs of the terminal Proterozoic Nama Group (c. 550–543 Ma), Namibia. _Geol. Mag._ 142, 499–517 (2005). Article  ADS  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Dibenedetto, S. & Grotzinger, J. Geomorphic evolution of a storm-dominated carbonate ramp (c. 549 Ma), Nama Group, Namibia. _Geol. Mag._ 142, 583–604 (2005). Article  ADS  CAS

  Google Scholar  * Adams, E. W. _et al._ Digital characterization of thrombolite-stromatolite reef distribution in a carbonate ramp system (terminal proterozoic, Nama Group, Namibia). _Am.

Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull._ 89, 1293–1318 (2005). Google Scholar  * Shapiro, R. S. & Awramik, S. M. Favosamaceria cooperi new group and form: A widely dispersed, time-restricted

thrombolite. _J. Paleontol._ 80, 411–422 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Harwood Theisen, C. & Sumner, D. Y. Thrombolite fabrics and origins: Influences of diverse microbial and

metazoan processes on Cambrian thrombolite variability in the Great Basin, California and Nevada. _Sedimentology_ 63, 2217–2252 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Playford, P. E. &

Lowry, D. C. _Devonian reef Complexes of the Canning Basin, Western_ 118 (Australia, 2009). Google Scholar  * Dorobek, S., Piccoli, L., Coffey, B. & Adams, A. Carbonate Rock-Forming

Processes in the Pre-salt “Sag” Successions of Campos Basin, Offshore Brazil: Evidence for Seasonal, Dominantly Abiotic Carbonate Precipitation, Substrate Controls, and Broader Geologic

Implications. In _AAPG Hedberg Conference: Microbial Carbonate Reservoir Characterization_ (American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), 2012). * Saller, A. _et al._ Presalt

stratigraphy and depositional systems in the Kwanza Basin, offshore Angola. _Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull._ 100, 1135–1164 (2016). Google Scholar  * Hofmann, H. J. Precambrian Microflora,

Belcher Islands, Canada: Significance and systematics. _J. Paleontol._ 50, 1040–1073 (1976). Google Scholar  * Golubic, S. & Seong-Joo, L. Early cyanobacterial fossil record:

Preservation, palaeoenvironments and identification. _Eur. J. Phycol._ 34, 339–348 (1999). Article  Google Scholar  * Schopf, J. W. The fossil record of cyanobacteria. In _Ecology of

Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time_ (ed. Whitton, B. A.) 15–36 (Springer, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3855-3_2. Chapter  Google Scholar  * Wu, Y. S., Jiang, H.

X., Li, Y. & Yu, G. L. Microfabric features of microbial carbonates: Experimental and natural evidence of mold holes and crusts. _J. Palaeogeogr._ 10, 25 (2021). Article  Google Scholar

  * Logan, B. W., Hoffman, P. & Gebelein, C. D. Algal mats, cryptalgal fabrics, and structures, Hamelin Pool, Western Australia. In _Memoir 22: Evolution and Diagenesis of Quaternary

Carbonate Sequences, Shark Bay, Western Australia_ 140–194 (American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), 1974). * Fischer, A. G. Fossils, early life, and atmospheric history. _Proc.

Natl. Acad. Sci. USA_ 53, 1205–1215 (1965). Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Garrett, P. Phanerozoic stromatolites: Noncompetitive ecologic restriction by grazing and

burrowing animals. _Science (80–)_ 169, 171–173 (1970). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Awramik, S. M. Precambrian columnar stromatolite diversity: Reflection of metazoan appearance.

_Science (80–)_ 174, 825–827 (1971). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Monty, C. Precambrian background and Phanerozoic history of stromatolitic communities, an overview. _Ann. Soc. Géol.

Belg._ 96, 585–624 (1973). Google Scholar  * Walter, M. R. & Heys, G. R. Links between the rise of the metazoa and the decline of stromatolites. _Precambrian Res._ 29, 149–174 (1985).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Suosaari, E. P. _et al._ New multi-scale perspectives on the stromatolites of Shark Bay, Western Australia. _Sci. Rep._ 6, 1–13 (2016). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Playford, P. E. _Geology of the Shark Bay area, Western Australia_. (1990). * Playford, P. E. _et al._ _Geology of Shark Bay. Bulletin 146 of the Geological Survey of Western

Australia_ (Geological Survey of Western Australia, 2013). Google Scholar  * Jahnert, R. J. & Collins, L. B. Significance of subtidal microbial deposits in Shark Bay, Australia. _Mar.

Geol._ 286, 106–111 (2011). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Hagan, G. M. & Logan, B. W. _Development of Carbonate Banks and Hypersaline Basins, Shark Bay, Western Australia_. _Memoir 22:

Evolution and Diagenesis of Quaternary Carbonate Sequences, Shark Bay, Western Australia_ (American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), 1974). https://doi.org/10.1306/m22379c2. *

Reid, R. P., James, N. P., Macintyre, I. G., Dupraz, C. P. & Burne, R. V. Shark bay stromatolites: Microfabrics and reinterpretation of origins. _Facies_ 49, 299–324 (2003). Article 

Google Scholar  * Suosaari, E. P. _et al._ Environmental pressures influencing living stromatolites in Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay, Western Australia. _Palaios_ 31, 483–496 (2016). Article  ADS

  Google Scholar  * Suosaari, E. P., Reid, R. P. & Andres, M. S. Stromatolites, so what?! A tribute to Robert N. Ginsburg. _Depos. Rec._ 5, 486–497 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  *

Golubic, S. & Hofmann, H. J. Comparison of holocene and mid-Precambrian Entophysalidaceae (Cyanophyta) in stromatolitic algal mats: Cell division and degradation. _J. Paleontol._ 50,

1074–1082 (1976). Google Scholar  * Golubic, S. Stromatolites, fossil and recent: A case history. In _Biomineralization and Biological Metal Accumulation_ (eds Westbroek, P. & de Jong,

E. W.) 313–326 (D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983). Chapter  Google Scholar  * Golubic, S. Modern stromatolites: A review. In _Calcareous Algae and Stromatolites_ (ed. Riding, R.) 541–561

(Springer, 1991). Chapter  Google Scholar  * Kaźmierczak, J., Coleman, M. L., Gruszczyński, M. & Kempe, S. Cyanobacterial key to the genesis of micritic and peloidal limestones in

ancient seas. _Acta Palaeontol. Pol._ 41, 319–338 (1996). Google Scholar  * Golubic, S. & Abed, R. M. M. Entophysalis mats as environmental regulators. In _Microbial Mats_ (eds Seckbach,

J. & Oren, A.) 237–251 (Springer, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3799-2_12. Chapter  Google Scholar  * Wefer, G. Carbonate production by algae Halimeda, Penicillus and

Padina. _Nature_ 285, 323–324 (1980). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tucker, M. E. & Wright, V. P. _Carbonate Sedimentology_ (Blackwell, 1990). Book  Google Scholar  * Schlager, W.

Sedimentation rates and growth potential of tropical, cool water and mud-mound carbonate systems. In _Carbonate Platform Systems: Components and interactions_ Vol 178 (eds Insalaco, E. _et

al._) 217–227 (Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2000). Google Scholar  * Schlager, W. Benthic carbonate factories of the Phanerozoic. _Int. J. Earth Sci._ 92, 445–464

(2003). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Schlager, W. _Carbonate Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy_ (SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology, 2005). Book  Google Scholar  * Jones, B. &

Desrochers, A. Shallow platform carbonates. In _Facies Models: Response to Sea Level Change_ (eds Walker, R. G. & James, N. P.) 277–301 (Geological Association of Canada, 1992). Google

Scholar  * Laugié, M., Michel, J., Pohl, A., Poli, E. & Borgomano, J. Global distribution of modern shallow-water marine carbonate factories: A spatial model based on environmental

parameters. _Sci. Rep._ 9, 29–31 (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Reijmer, J. J. G. _Carbonate Factories. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series Part 2_ (Springer, 2014). Google

Scholar  * James, N. P. & Jones, B. _Origin of Carbonate Sedimentary Rocks_ (Wiley, 2016). Google Scholar  * Logan, B. W. Cryptozoon and Associate Stromatolites from the Recent, Shark

Bay, Western Australia. _J. Geol._ 69, 517–533 (1961). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Playford, P. E. E. & Cockbain, A. E. E. Chapter 8.2 modern algal stromatolites at Hamelin Pool, A

Hypersaline Barred Basin in Shark Bay, Western Australia. In _Stromatolites _ Vol 20 (ed. Walter, M.R.B.T.-D.) 389–411 (Elsevier, 1976). Chapter  Google Scholar  * Awramik, S. M. &

Riding, R. Role of algal eukaryotes in subtidal columnar stromatolite formation. _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci._ 85, 1327–1329 (1988). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *

Collins, L. B. & Jahnert, R. J. Stromatolite research in the Shark Bay world heritage area. _J. R. Soc. West. Aust._ 97, 189–219 (2014). Google Scholar  * Hagan, P. D. _Internal Fabrics

and Microbial Precipitation in the Stromatolites of Hamelin Pool, Western Australia_ (University of Miami, 2015). Google Scholar  * Blanchard, G. F. _et al._ The effect of geomorphological

structures on potential biostabilisation by microphytobenthos on intertidal mudflats. _Cont. Shelf Res._ 20, 1243–1256 (2000). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Dupraz, C., Visscher, P. T.,

Baumgartner, L. K. & Reid, R. P. Microbe-mineral interactions: Early carbonate precipitation in a hypersaline lake (Eleuthera Island, Bahamas). _Sedimentology_ 51, 745–765 (2004).

Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Dupraz, C. _et al._ Processes of carbonate precipitation in modern microbial mats. _Earth-Sci. Rev._ 96, 141–162 (2009). Article  ADS  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Aitken, J. D. _The Ice Brook Formation and post-Rapitan, Late Proterozoic Glaciation, Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin_ Vol 404

(Geological Society of Canada, 1991). Book  Google Scholar  * Kennedy, M. J. Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and isotopic geochemistry of Australian Neoproterozoic postglacial cap dolostones:

Deglaciation, 13C excursions, and carbonate precipitation. _J. Sediment. Res._ 66, 1050–1064 (1996). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hoffman, P. F., Macdonald, F. A. & Halverson, G.

P. Chapter 5: Chemical sediments associated with Neoproterozoic glaciation: Iron formation, cap carbonate, barite and phosphorite. _Geol. Soc. Mem._ 36, 67–80 (2011). Article  Google

Scholar  * Reid, R. P. Nonskeletal peloidal precipitates in Upper Triassic reefs, Yukon Territory (Canada). _J. Sediment. Res._ 57, 893–900 (1987). Google Scholar  * Schopf, J. W. &

Zeller Oehler, D. How old are Eukaryotes?. _Science (80–)_ 193, 47–49 (1976). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hodgskiss, M. S. W. _et al._ New insights on the Orosirian carbon cycle,

early Cyanobacteria, and the assembly of Laurentia from the Paleoproterozoic Belcher Group. _Earth Planet. Sci. Lett._ 520, 141–152 (2019). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Swanson-Hysell, N. L. _et al._ Constraints on neoproterozoic paleogeography and paleozoic orogenesis from paleomagnetic records of the bitter springs formation, amadeus basin, central

Australia. _Am. J. Sci._ 312, 817–884 (2012). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Schopf, J. W. Microflora of the bitter springs formation, Late Precambrian, Central Australia. _J. Paleontol._

42, 651–688 (1968). Google Scholar  * Southgate, P. N. Depositional environment and mechanism of preservation of microfossils, upper Proterozoic Bitter Springs Formation, Australia.

_Geology_ 14, 683–686 (1986). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Southgate, P. Relationships between cyclicity and stromatolite form in the Late Proterozoic Bitter Springs Formation, Australia.

_Sedimentology_ 36, 323–339 (1989). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Planavsky, N. J. & Grey, K. Stromatolite branching in the Neoproterozoic of the Centralian Superbasin, Australia: An

investigation into sedimentary and microbial control of stromatolite morphology. _Geobiology_ 6, 33–45 (2008). PubMed  Google Scholar  * Knoll, A. H. & Golubic, S. Anatomy and taphonomy

of a precambrian algal stromatolite. _Precambrian Res._ 10, 115–151 (1979). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Stolz, J. F. _et al._ The microbial communities of the modern marine stromatolites

at Highborne Cay, Bahamas. _Atoll Res. Bull._ 20, 1–29 (2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Nye, O. B., Dean, D. A. & Hinds, R. W. Improved Thin Section Techniques for Fossil and Recent

Organisms Published by : SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology Stable. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1302848 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: 46, 271–275

(1972). Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Geological Survey of Western Australia and Bush Heritage Australia for logistical support; and the University of Miami field team

for field and technical assistance; and federal Department of Environment and Energy for field access and sampling permits. C. Mercadier would like to pay tribute to the memory of A.F.

Maurin, whose visionary perception of microbial carbonate precipitation was an inspiration for his students. This project was funded by Chevron, BP, Repsol and Shell. Hamelin Stromatolite

Contribution Series #8. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * Christophe Mercadier is retired. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History,

Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, 20560, USA Erica P. Suosaari * Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33149, USA Erica P. Suosaari, R.

Pamela Reid, Brooke E. Vitek, Amanda M. Oehlert, Paige E. Giusfredi & Gregor P. Eberli * Bush Heritage Australia, 395 Collins St., Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia Erica P. Suosaari *

Shell International, Colombes, France Christophe Mercadier * Department of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15282, USA John F. Stolz Authors * Erica P. Suosaari View

author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * R. Pamela Reid View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *

Christophe Mercadier View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Brooke E. Vitek View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Amanda M. Oehlert View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * John F. Stolz View author publications You can also search

for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Paige E. Giusfredi View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Gregor P. Eberli View author publications

You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS E.P.S. and R.P.R. wrote the main manuscript text. E.P.S., R.P.R., C.M., B.E.V., P.E.G., J.F.S., and G.P.E. conducted

field work. E.P.S., R.P.R., J.F.S, B.E.V., A.M.O., and P.E.G. conducted laboratory analysis. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Erica P.

Suosaari. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to

jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under

a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate

credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article

are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons

licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of

this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Suosaari, E.P., Reid, R.P., Mercadier, C. _et al._ The

microbial carbonate factory of Hamelin Pool, Shark Bay, Western Australia. _Sci Rep_ 12, 12902 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16651-z Download citation * Received: 13 April 2022

* Accepted: 13 July 2022 * Published: 28 July 2022 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16651-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this

content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative