ABSTRACT As the "core" of fertilizer machinery, the fertilizer apparatus has a significant impact on the effect of fertilization operation. At present, the straight-grooves type

external groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is widely used, which has the problem that the fertilizer flow fluctuates periodically and is not conducive to precision fertilization. Therefore a

kind of the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is proposed in the paper, and the designed fertilizer apparatus is experimented and optimized by using Design-Expert Software 10 and a

self-made fertilizer experiment bench. Taking the fertilization amount and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount as the experiment index, the interaction effects of the groove

validation, the optimal combination of parameters is determined as follows: the groove radius is 13.5 mm, the spiral rising angle is 62°, the groove wheel rotation speed is 29.4 r/min, the

fertilizer tongue inclination is 5°, the fertilization amount is 17.810 g and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount is 5.60%. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS DESIGN AND

EXPERIMENTS WITH A SINGLE SPIRAL FIXED DEPTH DITCHING AND FERTILIZING MACHINE Article Open access 13 May 2023 DESIGN OPTIMIZATION AND EXPERIMENT OF CORN U-SHAPED FERTILIZATION DEVICE Article

Open access 14 June 2023 STRUCTURE PARAMETER DESIGN AND BENCH TEST RESEARCH OF PADDY FIELD BLADES Article Open access 30 August 2022 INTRODUCTION Rational and scientific fertilization is

one of the main ways to reduce agricultural pollution, reduce agricultural production costs, promote agricultural production, and increase farmers' income1. Fertilization methods mainly

include artificial fertilization and mechanical fertilization. Traditional artificial fertilization has disadvantages such as high cost, high labor intensity, and uneven application. The

use of mechanical fertilization can reduce production costs, reduce labor intensity and improve fertilization uniformity. Therefore, mechanical fertilization is the main method of

fertilization at present2,3. Due to the differences in topography, farming methods, crop types and environmental climate, the fertilizer applicators used are different, and the matching

fertilizer dispensers on the fertilization machines are also different. At present, there are nearly 20 types of fertilizer apparatuses used in agricultural production. The commonly used

fertilizer apparatuses include disc rotary type fertilizer apparatus, external groove wheel fertilizer apparatus, guide plate rotary disk type fertilizer apparatus, horizontal star wheel

type fertilizer apparatus, etcetera4. The large-scale fertilizer apparatus is mainly equipped in the seeder, and the sowing operation and fertilization operation are carried out at the same

time, for example, the single-vibration large-groove wheel fertilizer apparatus and the double-vibration square-shaft fertilizer apparatus of the British potato planter, and the nail-wheel

fertilizer apparatus used in Denmark and other European countries, these fertilizer apparatuses have uniform fertilization and high productivity5. Some countries have a wide crop area and

relatively equal terrain, so special fertilizer dispensers are used for spreading before soil preparation, intertillage fertilization, soil improvement, etc. It mainly uses the high-speed

rotating fertilizing disc to achieve the purpose of precise fertilization, the working mechanism of the centrifugal fertilizer spreader is to study the movement of fertilizer particles on

the disc, and its analysis model can predict the trajectory of a single particle on the disc6. Van Liedekerke et al.7 used the discrete element method to simulate and analyze the trajectory

of a single fertilizer particle on the rotating disc model of the fertilizer spreader. The simulation results of EDEM were compared with the actual fertilization test, and the simulation

results were in good agreement with the test results. At present, the disc-type variable fertilizer spreaders have been produced as commodities, such as the MDS series disc-type fertilizer

spreaders produced by the French Kuhn company, the DPX Prima fertilizer spreaders produced by the French Greiger-Besson company, etcetera8,9. In recent years, with the rapid development of

fertilizer technology and precision agriculture, fertilizers with good particle mobility such as compound fertilizer, compound fertilizer, and slow-release fertilizer are increasingly used.

Due to the characteristics of simple structure, convenient operation, good versatility and low cost, the external groove wheel fertilizer device is one of the most widely used fertilizer

devices10,11. As the "core" of fertilization machinery, the fertilizer apparatus has a significant impact on the effect of fertilization operation. The performance of fertilizer

apparatus directly affects the amount, accuracy and stability of the fertilization process, that is, whether it meets the requirements of agricultural production. However, since the

traditional external groove wheel fertilizer apparatus adopts the straight-grooves type, the fertilizer is discharged in the form of self-flow at the fertilizer discharge port. When the

groove wheel turns to the groove, more fertilizer is discharged, while less fertilizer is discharged at the tooth ridge, and the fertilizer flow is periodically pulsating, especially at low

speeds, which affects the uniformity of fertilization and is not conducive to precision12,13,14. Because of the above problems, this paper proposes a spiral groove wheel fertilizer

apparatus, which has higher precision and more stable fertilizer discharge control. This product has certain practical significance and theoretical value. Since 2020, with the rapid

development of computers and other related technologies, numerical simulation has also been developed very quickly, especially the numerical simulation of particle motion is more and more

attention from scholars. EDEM is an excellent discrete element simulation software for particles, and there are scholars at home and abroad who use EDEM to research the physical properties

of particles15. In terms of soil, some scholars have used discrete element simulation techniques to study the influence of the surface morphology and the cut angle of the bulldozer plate on

the dynamic behavior of the soil. By introducing parallel constraints to characterize the cohesive interaction between soil particles, a nonlinear mechanical model of the soil particle

contact is established, and the perturbation behavior generated between the relevant components and soil is analyzed16. High-speed cameras and EDEM simulation were used to study the rolling

friction characteristics of corn seeds, and the deviation between the test results and the simulation results was small, which means that the simulation was able to simulate the actual

situation17. EDEM was used to simulate the flow accumulation behavior of particles under different physical conditions, and physical tests showed that the measured results were in good

agreement with the numerical simulation18. The effect of the rolling friction coefficient on stacking characteristics was simulated on the product of Japonica rice after hulling, and the

secondary simulation parameters were calibrated. The simulation results coincide with the experimental results, which indicate that the simulation of the stacking process by the

discrete-element method can provide an effective solution for the determination of physical parameters not easily measurable in the bulk particles19. STRUCTURE OF THE SPIRAL GROOVE WHEEL

FERTILIZER APPARATUS There are numerous classifications of fertilizers, which can be divided into organic fertilizers and chemical fertilizers according to their composition, and powder

fertilizers, granular fertilizers and liquid fertilizers according to their physical form. Granular fertilizers are widely used due to their physical properties, ease of transportation and

storage, ease of application, and slow release. In orchards, the commonly used granular fertilizers are compound mixed fertilizers, and the fertilizer apparatus in paper is applied to

granular fertilizers. Several kinds of granular fertilizers are shown in Figure 1, among which Jibang biomass organic fertilizer is the main research object due to its more uniform

fertilizer, regular shape, and wider application. As shown in Figure 2, the structure of the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is mainly composed of a fertilizer wheel, retaining

ring, fertilizer box, fertilizer tongue, and fertilizer mouth. In order to improve the pulsation characteristics of the ordinary external groove wheel fertilizer apparatus and the accuracy

of fertilization, the fertilizer wheel adopts the spiral groove wheel with an optimized design and the outer end of the fertilizer tongue has a certain inclination in the fertilizer

apparatus proposed10,20,21,22,23. The spiral groove wheel designed is composed of the upper core (the spiral groove part) and the lower core (the cylinder part). The advantages of using this

structure are as follows: (1) It is easy to install and debug. (2) The lower core can be interchanged with different spiral grooves of equal diameter, which means that if different groove

radii, different spiral rising angles and different number of groove wheels are required, only the upper core needs to be replaced to save materials and costs. The retaining ring

corresponding to the spiral groove wheel is also designed. The retaining ring can move along the groove wheel, so as to change the working length of the groove wheel and adjust the

fertilization amount. In addition, the fertilization amount can also be adjusted by rotating speed. When the fertilizer wheel rotates, the spiral groove wheel and the retaining ring rotate

together with the shaft. The flower-shaped retaining ring prevents fertilizer leakage and reduces the wear of the spiral groove wheel. The retainer is fixed on the housing to prevent the

axial movement of the flower-shaped retaining ring. The opening of the fertilizer tongue can be adjusted to suit fertilizers of different particle sizes. If the opening is too large, some

fertilizers may flow automatically to affect the uniformity and stability of fertilization. If the opening is too small, the fertilizer particle breakage rate is large, which may also affect

the uniformity and stability of fertilization. When the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is fertilizing, the fertilizer particles fill the groove of the spiral groove wheel under

the action of gravity. The fertilizer in the groove, which is called the active layer, is forced out with the rotation of the spiral groove wheel. The fertilizer outside the groove wheel,

which is called the passive layer, is driven to discharge under the action of the pulling force of the outer circle of the groove wheel and the friction between the fertilizers. The

fertilizers in the active layer and passive layer are squeezed into the fertilizer tongue and then are applied into the soil through the fertilizer pipe from the fertilizer outlet24. The

fertilization amount of the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus, i.e. the fertilization amount of each rotation of the groove wheel, can be given as: $$q = \pi DL\gamma \left(

{\frac{{\alpha_{0} S}}{t} + \lambda } \right)$$ (1) where _q_ is the fertilization amount of the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus, g/r; _D_ is the groove wheel diameter, mm; _L_ is

the effective working length of the groove wheel, mm; _γ_ is fertilizer particle density25, 1.32×10−3 g/mm3; α0 is the fertilizer filling coefficient in the groove; _S_ is the

cross-sectional area of a single groove, mmSPS:refid::bib22; _t_ is the groove pitch, _t_=_πd/z_, and _z_ is the groove number; _λ_ is the characteristic parameter of the driving layer. _S_

can be obtained from the geometry of the groove wheel. As shown in Figure 3, the cross-sectional area of the groove can be expressed as: $$\begin{aligned} S = & \frac{{(180^{ \circ } -

\eta )\pi r^{2} + \mu \pi R^{2} }}{{360^{ \circ } }} + r^{2} \left( {\cos \frac{\eta }{2}\sin \frac{\eta }{2} - \cos \frac{\eta }{2} - \cos \frac{\mu }{2}\sin \frac{\eta }{2} + \frac{{h\cos

\frac{\eta }{2}}}{r}} \right) \\ + \frac{b}{2}\left( {r\sin \frac{\eta }{2} - r + h - R\cos \frac{\mu }{2}} \right) \\ \end{aligned}$$ (2) where _η_ is the included angle of two tangent

lines of the groove edge; _r_ is the groove radius, mm; _μ_ is the central angle of the groove wheel corresponding to the groove, °; _R_ is the groove wheel radius, mm; _h_ is the depth of

the groove, mm; _b_ is the width of the groove, mm. PARAMETER DESIGN OF THE SPIRAL GROOVE WHEEL FERTILIZER APPARATUS PARAMETER DESIGN OF THE SPIRAL GROOVE WHEEL The traditional external

groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is mainly straight groove type (the spiral rising angle is 90°), and the fertilizer is discharged at the fertilizer outlet in the form of gravity flow. When

the groove wheel turns to the groove, the fertilizer in the whole groove is discharged at the same time. At this time, more fertilizer is discharged, which is called the "crest".

While less fertilizer is discharged at the tooth ridge, which is called the "trough". As shown in Figure 4a, assuming that _t_ is the time required for the groove wheel to rotate

through the two grooves in the figure, the cycle of "crests and troughs" is carried out twice within _t_ time. At this time, the fertilizer flow shows a periodic pulsation

phenomenon with a pulse frequency of 2/_t_, which affects the uniformity of fertilization and is not conducive to precision fertilization, especially at low speed and small grooves. To solve

the above problems, the straight groove wheel is changed to a spiral groove wheel in paper, as shown in Figure 4b. Since the groove wheel is spiral, the fertilizer is continuously

discharged at the fertilizer outlet, which effectively reduces the "crests and troughs" in the pulsation phenomenon and significantly reduces the difference between the maximum and

minimum values, thus improving the uniformity of fertilization. The diameter of the groove wheel has an impact on the fertilization performance of the fertilizer apparatus. In order to be

interchangeable with the purchased external groove wheel fertilizer apparatus, the groove wheel diameter _D_ is 61.6 mm and the effective working length of the groove wheel _L_ is 63 mm. The

groove radius also affects the uniformity and amount of fertilization. Considering the actual requirements of the groove radius, groove number, and fertilization amount in the orchard, the

number of grooves _Z_ is selected as 6 and the groove radius _r_ is set to 9 – 14mm. In the fertilization process of the spiral groove wheel, the fertilizer moves in axial and radial

directions under the action of the rotating spiral groove wheel. To carry out the dynamic analysis of fertilizer particles in the spiral groove wheel, assuming no relative slip between

particles and ignoring the effect of surface roughness of the spiral groove wheel. A single fertilizer particle at distance_ r_ from the axis is selected and simplified to particle A as the

research object26,27. When the spiral rising angle _α_ is expanded and the spiral line is represented by an oblique line, the force diagram of fertilizer particles in the horizontal plane is

shown in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5, _F_N is the normal thrust from the spiral groove on the fertilizer particles; _f_N is the tangential friction generated on the contact surface

between the spiral groove wheel and fertilizer particles. _F_ is the resultant force of _F_N and _f_N; _ρ_ is the friction angle of fertilizer particles after ignoring the roughness of the

spiral groove wheel. Thus, the resultant force _F_ can be decomposed into the circular force and axial force of fertilizer particles: $$\left\{ \begin{gathered} F_{T} = F\sin (\alpha + \rho

) \hfill \\ F_{Z} = F\cos (\alpha + \rho ) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$ (3) where _F_T is the circular force of fertilizer particles; _F_Z is the axial force of fertilizer particles;

_F_=_F_N/cos_ρ_. According to the measured fertilizer particle size25 and based on the measurement principle of the inclined plane method, the friction angle of fertilizer particles is

determined to be 15.74° by the self-made friction coefficient measuring instrument, as shown in Figure 6. In the case of other parameters being determined and the resultant force F fixed

(assuming 1N), the curves of the circular force _F_T and axial force _F_Z of fertilizer particles in the spiral groove wheel with the change of the spiral rising angle are shown in Figure 7.

As shown in Figure 7, with the increase of the spiral rising angle _α_, _F_T firstly increases and then decreases, reaching the maximum at 74.26°. _F_Z decreases with the increase of _α_.

The increase of circumferential force is beneficial to the smooth discharge of fertilizer in the spiral groove, but if it is too large which will affect the filling rate of fertilizer

particles in the spiral groove, resulting in uneven fertilization. The reduction of axial force is conducive to reducing the axial movement distance of fertilizer particles in the spiral

groove wheel and improving the uniformity of fertilization. However, if _α_ is larger, the spiral groove wheel will be closer to the ordinary straight groove wheel, and the "pulsation

phenomenon" will be more significant, which will reduce the uniformity of fertilization. According to Figure 4 and Equation (3), when the spiral rising angle of the fertilizer wheel is

0°, the groove wheel edge is distributed along the circumference of the fertilizer wheel. This structure is not used in practical applications because the fertilizer is easy to

"slip" in the groove wheel causing fertilizer blockage, which is not conducive to the discharge of fertilizer at the fertilizer outlet. When the spiral rising angle of the

fertilizer wheel is 90° which means a straight groove wheel, there is only circular force but no axial force, and the fertilizer particles will not occur axial relative movement after

filling the groove, which makes more fertilizer discharge at the groove and less at the groove edge, resulting in intermittent fertilizer discharge and obvious pulsation. Therefore, in

combination with relevant literature26,27 and the above analysis, the horizontal range of the spiral rising angle is 45°–85°. According to the working principle of the fertilizer apparatus,

the groove radius, spiral rising angle, and groove wheel rotation speed are the main parameters affecting the fertilization performance. Therefore, the formulas for the fertilization amount

and variation coefficient of fertilization amount are as follows: $$q = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {q_{i} } ,$$ (4) $$S = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n} {(q_{i} - q)^{2} }

}}{n - 1}} ,$$ (5) $$V = \frac{S}{q} \times 100,$$ (6) where _q__i_ is the fertilization amount applied to each cell, g; _q_ is the average of the fertilization amount applied to each cell,

g; _S_ is the standard deviation of the fertilization amount applied to each cell, g; n is the number of cells; V is the variation coefficient of fertilization amount, %. PARAMETER DESIGN OF

THE INCLINED FERTILIZER TONGUE The position and length of the fertilizer tongue ensure that will not flow automatically under the static state. The outer end of the fertilizer tongue is

made into an inclined shape, which is conducive to improving the uniformity of fertilization28. The Figure 8 shows the design requirement of the fertilizer tongue. In the figure, AC is the

fertilizer tongue that can swing around C; AB is the tangent line of the outer circle O of the groove wheel; The included angle _δ_ between AB and the horizontal line shall be smaller than

the natural repose angle of fertilizer particles. The natural repose angle of the fertilizer particles used in the experiment is determined to be 38°. The repose angle of fertilizer

particles is generally 35°– 44°, and the corresponding angle _δ_ is 32.15° when the inclination angle of the fertilizer tongue is 20°24, which meets the design requirements. Therefore, the

value range of the inclination angle of the fertilizer tongue is 5°–20°, the fertilizer tongue with an inclination of 15° is shown in Figure 9. EXPERIMENT AND ANALYSIS EXPERIMENT EQUIPMENT

AND CONDITIONS The traditional external groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is mainly straight groove type (the spiral rising angle is 90°), and the fertilizer is discharged at the fertilizer

outlet in the form of gravity flow. When the groove wheel turns to the groove, the fertilizer in the whole groove is discharged at the same time. At this time, more fertilizer is discharged,

which is called the "crest". While less fertilizer is discharged at the tooth ridge, which is called the "trough". As shown in Figure 4a, assuming that _t_ is the time

required for the groove wheel to rotate through the two grooves in the figure, the cycle of "crests and troughs" is carried out twice within _t_ time. At this time, the fertilizer

flow shows a periodic pulsation phenomenon with a pulse frequency of 2/_t_, which affects the uniformity of fertilization and is not conducive to precision fertilization, especially at low

speed and small grooves. To solve the above problems, the straight groove wheel is changed to a spiral groove wheel in paper, as shown in Figure 4b. Since the groove wheel is spiral, the

fertilizer is continuously discharged at the fertilizer outlet, which effectively reduces the "crests and troughs" in the pulsation phenomenon and significantly reduces the

difference between the maximum and minimum values, thus improving the uniformity of fertilization. The experiment materials and equipment used in this paper are listed in Table 1. The

ALC-210.3 electronic balance and SM2234A non-contact tachometer are shown in Figures 10 and 11 respectively. Based on the FDM type 3D printing technology, the groove wheel in the experiment

and analysis is rapidly formed. As shown in Figure 12, this forming method does not require complex and expensive processes in traditional groove wheel manufacturing, which reduces the

production cost and improves the experiment efficiency. The fertilization performance of the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is experimented on the self-made fertilizer experiment

bench. As shown in Figure 13, the self-made fertilizer experiment bench mainly includes fertilizing parts and walking parts. The motor pulls the fertilizer bench to walk at a constant speed

on the guide rail, and the fertilizer is forced to be discharged under the rotation of the groove wheel. Based on the gaps in the orchard crop plantings, the weight of the fertilizer in each

unit was measured in 150mm units, which is the main amount of fertilizer received by each crop29. Take a distance of 150mm as a measuring unit, and measure the weight of fertilizer in each

unit. Each parameter is repeated 5 times, and the arithmetic mean value is used to calculate the average fertilization amount and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount. The

fertilization experiment ground of the bench experiment is shown in Figure 14. The fertilization amount tended to increase linearly with increasing groove radius during the experiment, and

the variation coefficient of fertilization amount tended to decrease with increasing groove radius. The changes in the spiral rising angle have no significant impact on the fertilization

amount, but have a significant impact on the coefficient of variation of the fertilization amount. EXPERIMENT SCHEME AND RESULTS The factors that affect the fertilization performance of the

fertilizer apparatus are the groove radius, spiral rising angle, groove wheel rotation speed, and fertilizer tongue inclination of the spiral groove wheel type fertilizer wheel. In this

paper, the fertilization amount and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount are taken as the experiment index, the CCD (Central Composite Experimental Design) method is used to

conduct the response surface analysis experiment of four factors and five levels on the above factors. Table 2 is the symbol comparison table of influencing factors and experiment indexes,

and the factor codes and experiment design levels are listed in Table 3. The Design-Expert Software 10 is used to analyze the experiment data, and the regression equation is obtained by

linear and quadratic polynomial fitting of the experiment data. The most appropriate model is selected according to the _F_ test and _p_ value to obtain the corresponding statistical results

and response surface analysis results. Experiment schemes and experiment results are listed in Table 4. VARIANCE ANALYSIS OF THE EXPERIMENT RESULTS The stepwise regression method is adopted

to eliminate insignificant factors, and the quadratic regression equation variance analysis is conducted for the fertilization amount and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount

respectively. The analysis results are listed in Table 5 and 6 respectively. The results of variance analysis show that the two models have extremely significant (_P_<0.01), the fitting

coefficients are 0.9651 and 0.8389 respectively. The error is mainly caused by non-uniform fertilizer particles and a small part of the particles broken during fertilization. The RSM

(Response Surface Method) model can generally be considered effective if its fitting coefficient exceeds 0.80. Therefore, the fitting degree of the two models is high, which has certain

practical significance. As shown in Table 5, according to the _F_ value of each factor, within the selected factor level range, the groove wheel rotation speed (_x_3) is the most influential

factor on the fertilization amount, and after that the groove radius (_x_1), the fertilizer tongue inclination (_x_4), the quadratic effect of the spiral rising angle (_x_22), the

interaction between the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed (_x_1_x_3) and the spiral rising angle (_x_2). Similarly, Table 6 shows that the groove wheel rotation speed (_x_3)

is the most influential factor on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount, and after that the quadratic effect of the groove wheel rotation speed (_x_32), the groove radius (_x_1),

the interaction between the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed (_x_1_x_3), the spiral rising angle (_x_2), the quadratic effect of the spiral rising angle (_x_22), the

interaction between the groove radius and the fertilizer tongue inclination (_x_1_x_4), the quadratic effect of the groove radius (_x_12) and the fertilizer tongue inclination (_x_4). Based

on the experimental results and analysis results, the fitting mathematical models of fertilization amount and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount are obtained as follows:

$$y_{1} = 13.22 + 1.6x_{1} + 0.22x_{2} + 2.53x_{3} + 0.41x_{4} + 0.37x_{1} x_{3} - 0.26x_{2}^{2}$$ (7) $$y_{2} = 5.47 - 0.83x_{1} + 0.45x_{2} - 0.84x_{3} - 0.19x_{4} + 0.73x_{1} x_{3} +

0.48x_{1} x_{4} + 0.34x_{1}^{2} + 0.36x_{2}^{2} + 0.72x_{3}^{2}$$ (8) RESPONSE SURFACE ANALYSIS The Figure 15 shows the response diagram and contour map of the influence of the groove radius

and the groove wheel rotation speed on the fertilization amount when the spiral rising angle is 65° and the fertilizer tongue inclination is 10°. As shown in Figure 15, the interaction

between the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed has a significant impact on the fertilization amount. The fertilization amount increases with the increase in the groove radius

and the groove wheel rotation speed, and the increasing trend caused by the groove wheel rotation speed is more significant than that caused by the groove radius. When the groove radius and

the groove wheel rotation speed increase at the same time, and close to the limit point (12.5 mm, 30 r/min) in the figure, the increase trend of the curve surface in the response diagram for

the fertilization amount is more significant. In addition, when the spiral rising angle changes within the selected value range, the volume change in the groove of the groove wheel is less

than 0.1% due to the same cross-sectional area of the groove wheel. So the fertilizer filling amount is basically the same and the spiral rising angle has little impact on the fertilization

amount. The Figure 16 shows the response diagram and contour map of the influence of the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed on the variation coefficient of fertilization

amount when the spiral rising angle is 65° and the fertilizer tongue inclination is 10°. As shown in Figure 16, the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed have an interactive

effect on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount. When the groove wheel rotation speed is less than 25 r/min, the variation coefficient of fertilization amount decreases with the

increase of the groove radius, and the variation trend is particularly significant at low rotational speed and shows a linear correlation. When the groove wheel rotation speed exceeds 25

r/min, the influence of the groove radius on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount decreases gradually, no longer showing linear correlation, but showing a trend of decreasing

first and then increasing with the increase of the groove radius. Similarly, the influence of the groove wheel rotation speed on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount is

basically the same as that of the groove radius. When the groove radius is less than 11.5 mm, the variation coefficient of fertilization amount can be increased by reducing the groove wheel

rotation speed. When the groove radius is more than 11.5 mm, the influence of the groove wheel rotation speed on the variation coefficient of fertilization gradually decreases, and even

appears a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. On the whole, when the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed increase at the same time, the variation coefficient of

fertilization amount decreases first and then increases. The Figure 17 shows the response diagram and contour map of the influence of the fertilizer tongue inclination and the groove radius

on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount when the spiral rising angle is 65° and the groove wheel rotation speed is 25 r/min. As shown in Figure 17, the interaction between the

fertilizer tongue inclination and the groove radius has a significant impact on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount. When the fertilizer tongue inclination is constant, the

variation coefficient of fertilization amount increases with the decrease in the groove radius, and the changing trend under the small fertilizer tongue inclination is more obvious than that

under the large fertilizer tongue inclination. When the groove radius is smaller than the central level (11.5 mm), the variation coefficient of fertilization amount can be decreased by

increasing the fertilizer tongue inclination. When the groove radius is larger than the central level, the variation coefficient of fertilization amount increases with the increase of the

fertilizer tongue inclination. Taken overall, when the fertilizer tongue inclination and the groove radius decrease at the same time, the variation coefficient of fertilization amount shows

a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. Furthermore, when the small fertilizer tongue inclination and the large groove radius are combined, the variation coefficient of

fertilization amount is relatively small. OPTIMIZATION DESIGN AND VALIDATION To obtain the best parameter combination, a multi-objective optimization method is adopted. The objective

function _y_1 and _y_2 are Equations (7) and (8) respectively, and the optimization equation is in the form of: $$\left\{ \begin{gathered} 9.5 \le x_{1} \le 13.5 \hfill \\ 45 \le x_{2} \le

85 \hfill \\ 15 \le x_{3} \le 30 \hfill \\ 5 \le x_{4} \le 15 \hfill \\ y_{1} = f_{1} (x_{1} ,x_{2} ,x_{3} ,x_{4} ) \hfill \\ y_{2} = f_{2} (x_{1} ,x_{2} ,x_{3} ,x_{4} ) \hfill \\ \max y_{1}

\hfill \\ \min y_{2} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$ (9) Based on the above optimization conditions, the predicted and actual optimization results are listed in Table 7. Under the

optimized conditions, the error between the predicted value of the fertilization amount and the actual value is 4.11%, and the error between the predicted value of the variation coefficient

of fertilization amount and the actual value is 5.51%, both of which are within a reasonable range, indicating the reliability of the optimization results29. For further verifying the

accuracy and reliability of the established quadratic regression model, the self-made fertilizer experiment bench is used for test validation within the experimental range. The relationship

between the measured value and the predicted value of the regression model of the fertilization amount and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount are shown in Figures 18 and 19

respectively. The predicted value and the actual value are generally distributed diagonally, indicating that the predicted value of the model is consistent with the actual measured value.

CONCLUSION To solve the problem that the fertilizer flow fluctuates periodically and is not conducive to precision fertilization of the commonly used straight-grooves type external groove

wheel fertilizer apparatus, a kind of the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is proposed in the paper. By changing the straight groove wheel to the spiral groove wheel, the fertilizer

is continuously discharged at the fertilizer outlet, effectively reducing the "crests and troughs" in the pulsation phenomenon and improving the uniformity of fertilization. The

structure of the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus and the dynamic characteristics of fertilizer particles in the fertilization are analyzed, and the interaction effects of various

structural parameters on fertilization performance are discussed by using Design-Expert Software 10 and a self-made fertilizer experiment bench. The optimal size of the spiral groove wheel

fertilizer apparatus is determined through optimization and experimental verification. The detailed conclusions are as follows: * 1) Within the selected factor level range, the interaction

between the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed has a significant impact on the fertilization amount. The fertilization amount increases with the increase in the groove radius

and the groove wheel rotation speed, and the increasing trend caused by the groove wheel rotation speed is more significant than that caused by the groove radius. In addition, the groove

wheel rotation speed is the most influential factor on the fertilization amount, and after that the groove radius, the fertilizer tongue inclination, the quadratic effect of the spiral

rising angle, the interaction between the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed and the spiral rising angle. * 2) Within the selected factor level range, the groove radius, the

groove wheel rotation speed, and the fertilizer tongue inclination have interactive effects on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount. The variation coefficient of fertilization

amount increases with the decrease in the groove radius under a constant fertilizer tongue inclination. When the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed are less than the central

level, which the groove radius is 11.5 mm and the groove wheel rotation speed is 25 r/min, the variation coefficient of fertilization amount can be decreased by increasing the groove radius,

the groove wheel rotation speed and the fertilizer tongue inclination. When the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed are larger than the central level, the variation

coefficient of fertilization amount decreases first and then increases with the increase of the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed, and increases with the increase of the

fertilizer tongue inclination. Furthermore, the groove wheel rotation speed is the most influential factor on the variation coefficient of fertilization amount, and after that the quadratic

effect of the groove wheel rotation speed, the groove radius, the interaction between the groove radius and the groove wheel rotation speed, the spiral rising angle, the quadratic effect of

the spiral rising angle, the interaction between the groove radius and the fertilizer tongue inclination, the quadratic effect of the groove radius and the fertilizer tongue inclination. *

3) Combined with the experimental validation, the response surface method and multi-objective optimization algorithm are adopted to optimize the design. The final parameter set of the spiral

groove wheel fertilizer apparatus is: the groove radius is 13.5 mm, the spiral rising angle is 62°, the groove wheel rotation speed is 29.4r/min and the fertilizer tongue inclination is 5°,

with the fertilization amount of 17.810 g and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount of 5.60%. * 4) The quadratic regression models of multiple factors are established for the

fertilization amount and the variation coefficient of fertilization amount with regard to the design variables. The accuracy and reliability of the regression models are verified by using

the self-made fertilizer experiment bench. The experiment results show that the predicted value and the actual value are distributed diagonally, indicating that the predicted value of the

model is consistent with the actual measured value. DATA AVAILABILITY All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Request for more details to the

corresponding author. REFERENCES * Xiongfei, C., Xiwen, L. & Zaiman, W. Design and experiment of fertilizer distribution apparatus with double-level screws. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric.

Mach._ 31, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.03.002 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Junyan, Y. Design of a new type of fertilizer applicator. _J. Mach. Des._ 33, 90–92.

https://doi.org/10.13841/j.cnki.jxsj.2016.12.019 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Dianyun, C., Hongwei, W. & Yang, F. Effects of different fertilization methods and planting densities

on yield and nitrogen utilization of hybrid maize Shen Nong T19. _Jiangsu Agric. Sci._ 45, 54–57. https://doi.org/10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2017.22.013 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  *

Hao, L. _A New Kind of Method for the Optimized Design of Outer Groove-Wheel Fertilizer Apparatuses_ (Jilin University, 2014). Google Scholar  * Fountas, S., Blackmore, S. & Ess, D.

Farmer experience with precision agriculture in Denmark and the US eastern corn belt. _Precis. Agric._ 6, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-004-1030-z (2015). Article  Google Scholar 

* Laurent, B. F. C. & Bridgwater, J. Dispersive granular flow in a horizontal drum stirred by a single blade. _AICHE J._ 48, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690480107 (2002). Article

  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar  * Van Liedekerke, P., Tijskens, E. & Dintwa, E. A discrete element model for simulation of a spinning disc fertilizer spreader I. _Single Part. Simul. Powder

Technol._ 170, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2006.07.024 (2006). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Youlu, B. Analysis of the development and the demands of fertilization machinery.

_Soil Fertil. Sci. China_ 23, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11838/sfsc.20160301 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Peng, L. _Theoretical and Experimental Study on Fertilizer Spreading Machines of

Swing Tube Type_ (Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013). Google Scholar  * Guoqiang, D., Haitao, C. & Yining, F. Parameter optimization and test of key parts of fertilizer allocation

device based on EDEM software. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng._ 32, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.07.005 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Xiong, G. & Lei, H.

Study on fertilizer experiment of 2CMG-4 type potato planter. _J. Agric. Mech. Res._ 38, 205–208. https://doi.org/10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.2016.04.042 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Wei, Z.,

Fulin, W. & Chun, W. Experimental study on 2BD-7type multifunctional precision seed spacing drill. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng._ 21, 81–84.

https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2005.04.019 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Yuxue, G., Jin, Y. & Chengliang, L. FIS-based method to generate bivariate control parameters

regulation sequence for fertilization. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng._ 27, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2011.11.026 (2011). Article  Google Scholar  * Xiu, W.,

Chunjiang, Z. & Zhijun, M. Design and experiment of variable rate fertilizer applicator. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng._ 20, 114–117. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2004.05.024

(2004). Article  Google Scholar  * Guoming, H. _Analytical Simulation of Granular Systems by Discrete Element Method_ (Wuhan University of Technology Press, 2010). Google Scholar  * Zheng,

M., Yaoming, L. & Lizhang, X. Summarize of particle movements research in agricultural engineering realm. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach._ 44, 22–29.

https://doi.org/10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2013.02.005 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Tao, C., Jia, L. & Li, Y. Experiment and simulation of rolling friction characteristic of corn

seed based on high-speed photography. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng._ 29, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.15.005 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Wanyi, L., Pan, Z.

& Liping, L. Simulation based on discrete element method and experiment on flow and packing behavior of particles. _Mech. Eng._ 24, 20–26 (2012). Google Scholar  * Yanlong, H., Fuguo, J.

& Yurong, T. Influence of granular co efficient of rolling friction on accumulation characteristics. _Acta Phys. Sin-Ch Ed._ 63, 173–179. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.63.174501 (2014).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ning, S. _Research on Variable Rate Fertilization Control Technology in Precision Agriculture_ (University of Science and Technology of China, 2016). Google

Scholar  * Ruru, X., Ruicheng, D. & Huawei, L. Design on double-hole former helm-shaped pneumatic precision hill planter of seed and fertilizer. _J. Agric. Mech. Res._ 32, 87–90.

https://doi.org/10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.2010.10.026 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Shizhe, C., Lixin, Z. & Zhen, L. Design of double variable control system of fertilization. _Xinjiang

Agric. Mech._ 12, 18–20. https://doi.org/10.13620/j.cnki.issn1007-7782.2016.01.006 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Shiqiang, P., Yaxiang, Z. & Liang, J. Design and experimental

research of external groove wheel fertilizer apparatus of 2BFJ-6 type variable rate fertilizer applicator. _J. Chin. Agric. Mech._ 37, 40–42.

https://doi.org/10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2016.01.011 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences. _Agricultural Machinery Design Manual_

1st edn. (China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2007). Google Scholar  * Zhou, Y., Qingchuang, Z. & Jianfeng, S. Study on the performance of fluted roller fertilizer

distributor based on EDEM and 3D printing. _J. Agric. Mech. Res._ 40, 175–180. https://doi.org/10.13427/j.cnki.njyi.2018.05.032 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Xu, M., Jianxia, K. &

Long, Q. Design and experiment of precision seeder for rice paddy field seedling. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach._ 46, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.07.005 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar  * Liquan, T., Jinwu, W. & Han, D. Design and performance experiment of helix grooved rice seeding device. _Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach._ 47, 46–52.

https://doi.org/10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.05.007 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Yongmei, W., Wanzhang, Y. & Xigui, W. Study on row sowing device with spiral sheave. _J. Xinjiang

Agric. Univ._ 29, 67–70. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8614.2006.01.017 (2006). Article  Google Scholar  * Jiahua, Z. _Simulation Analysis of Variable Fertilizer Applicator Apparatus

Fat Process Based on Discrete Element Method_ (Shihezi University, 2015). Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work is supported by the Guangzhou Education Bureau 2022

University Research Yangcheng Scholar Project, grant number 202235301; the Basic Research Program Project of Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology in 2022 (Research on the

Construction and Pickup System of Autonomous Mobile Forklift Platform for Storage Based on Lidar), grant number 2060206; the Guangdong Province Young Innovation Talent Programmed for

Ordinary Universities, grant number 2023KQNCX209. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Honghai Wang, Lai Zhou, Qingchuang Zhu. AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS *

Guangzhou Panyu Polytechnic, Guangzhou, 511483, People’s Republic of China Fujun Wen, Honghai Wang & Lai Zhou * Mingjiang Town People’s Government of Ningming County, Chongzuo City,

532503, Guangxi, People’s Republic of China Qingchuang Zhu Authors * Fujun Wen View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Honghai Wang View author

publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Lai Zhou View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Qingchuang Zhu

View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS Conceptualization, F.W. and Q.Z.; methodology, F.W. and Q.Z.; software, Q.Z.;

writing—original draft preparation, F.W., H.W. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, F.W., H.W. and L.Z.; funding acquisition, F.W. All authors reviewed the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR

Correspondence to Fujun Wen. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral

with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the

source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's

Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not

permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Wen, F., Wang, H., Zhou, L. _et al._ Optimal design and experimental research on

the spiral groove wheel fertilizer apparatus. _Sci Rep_ 14, 510 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51236-y Download citation * Received: 25 February 2023 * Accepted: 02 January 2024

* Published: 04 January 2024 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51236-y SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable

link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative