Mechanistic insights into sanbi decoction for osteoarthritis treatment based on network pharmacology and experimental validation

Mechanistic insights into sanbi decoction for osteoarthritis treatment based on network pharmacology and experimental validation

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT Sanbi Decoction (SBD) has demonstrated promising therapeutic potential in osteoarthritis (OA) treatment, yet its precise mechanisms remain unclear. This research combined


computational and experimental approaches, including bioinformatics analysis, network pharmacology, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and laboratory validation, to


investigate the mechanisms of action of SBD. A total of 114 active compounds and 113 intersecting targets were identified through TCMSP and multiple screening strategies. Gene Ontology (GO)


and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses revealed that these targets are primarily involved in key signaling pathways, including the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway,


IL-17 signaling pathway, and TNF signaling pathway. Among the active components, Shinflavanone, Gancaonin L, Xambioona, Phaseol, Gancaonin O, and Licoisoflavanone exhibited strong binding


affinity and structural stability with core targets, as validated by molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Experimental results confirmed that SBD alleviates oxidative


stress, reduces inflammation, and protects cartilage by inhibiting the AGE-RAGE/JNK pathway. These findings highlight SBD’s potential as a promising therapeutic agent for OA treatment.


SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS BERGENIN PROTECTS AGAINST OSTEOARTHRITIS BY INHIBITING STAT3, NF-ΚB AND JUN PATHWAYS AND SUPPRESSING OSTEOCLASTOGENESIS Article Open access 31 August


2024 EXPLORING THE ANTI-INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITY OF FUPENZIC ACID USING NETWORK PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION Article Open access 24 April 2025 PROBING THE MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF


KAEMPFEROL IN RELIEVING RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS BASED ON NETWORK PHARMACOLOGY Article Open access 12 April 2025 INTRODUCTION Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease


characterized by dysfunction, pain, and stiffness1. Synovitis is a key pathological feature of OA, which severely impacts patients’ quality of life2. According to the Global Burden of


Disease study, OA is a major public health concern, with 607 million people affected worldwide in 20213. The dual physical and psychological burden of OA imposes significant challenges on


families and society. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has demonstrated unique advantages in the treatment of OA due to its efficacy and minimal side effects, contributing significantly to


global health4,5. TCM approaches to treating OA are multifaceted, focusing on promoting blood circulation, nourishing the liver and kidneys, and improving joint function6,7. Sanbi Decoction


(SBD) is a traditional herbal formulation created by Dr. Li Baochao, a distinguished practitioner of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) from Luoyang, China. This formula consists of eight


herbs: Radix Saposhnikoviae (Fangfeng), Notopterygium Root (Qianghuo), Radix Gentianae Macrophyllae (Qinjiao), Coix Seed (Yiyiren), Angelica Sinensis (Danggui), Radix Aconiti (Chuanwu),


Radix Aconiti Kusnezoffii (Caowu), and Glycyrrhizae Radix (Gancao). SBD is known for its effects in dispelling wind and dampness and strengthening tendons and bones. While its components or


their compounds have shown potential for treating OA, the specific mechanisms and targets remain unclear, necessitating more comprehensive insights. Embracing novel approaches and fresh


insights is essential for gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the anti-osteoarthritis mechanisms of Traditional Chinese Medicine formulations. In recent years, with the rapid


development of bioinformatics, network pharmacology combined with computational simulations has emerged as a promising approach, laying the foundation for comprehensively understanding the


mechanisms of TCM in disease treatment8,9,10. As a computational technique, molecular docking predicts the binding affinity and interaction patterns between small-molecule ligands from


Traditional Chinese Medicine and protein receptors. This approach offers valuable insights into drug-target interactions and supports the pharmacological assessment of both TCM formulations


and individual herbs11. However, molecular docking lacks detailed assessments of interaction stability and dynamics. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations play a critical role in


bioinformatics, particularly in analyzing ligand-receptor interactions12. These simulations provide in-depth insights into the dynamic behavior of biomolecules, uncovering key information


about binding mechanisms, stability, and conformational changes. For instance, MD studies on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have revealed important insights into their conformational


dynamics, essential for understanding their role as drug targets13. Similarly, MD simulations have been pivotal in uncovering hidden binding sites and predicting drug-binding poses when


targeting small GTPases, crucial for developing novel inhibitors14. The integration of network pharmacology, molecular docking, MD simulations, and experimental validation enhances the


reliability of results15,16. Therefore, employing these methodologies to identify the active components and targets of SBD holds great potential for elucidating its anti-OA mechanisms (Fig. 


1). MATERIALS AND METHODS ACQUISITION AND ORGANIZATION OF GEO DATA Gene expression profile datasets GSE55235 and GSE55457 were retrieved from the GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus,


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database using “osteoarthritis” as the keyword. These datasets encompass microarray data from 50 samples. DATA ANALYSIS USING PERL AND R Background


correction and matrix normalization were performed in the R environment (version 4.4.1: https://www.r-project.org/) based on the characteristics of the data samples. The Limma R package


(version 3.62.1, https://bioconductor.org/packages/limma/) was utilized to analyze differential gene expression in the microarray data. Significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were


identified using filtering criteria of an adjusted p-value < 0.05 and an absolute value of log fold change (| log FC |) ≥ 1. Volcano plots for the microarray data were generated using


the ggplot2 package (version 3.5.1, https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/), and heatmaps of the gene chips were created using the pheatmap package (version 1.0.12,


https://cran.r-project.org/package=pheatmap). SELECTION OF SBD ACTIVE COMPONENTS AND TARGETS The herbal composition of SBD was input into the TCMSP (Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems


Pharmacology Database and Analysis Platform, https://www.91tcmsp.com/#/database). Active components were filtered using thresholds of oral bioavailability (OB) ≥ 30% and drug-likeness (DL) ≥


 0.1817,18, along with their corresponding targets. The UniProt (Universal Protein Resource, https://www.uniprot.org/) was used for target validation by confirming gene names and UniProt


IDs. Non-human genes were excluded to ensure the precise identification of potential targets of SBD active components. IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL DISEASE TARGETS For osteoarthritis-related


research, target information was collected from GeneCards (GeneCards® Human Gene Database, https://www.genecards.org/), DisGeNET (Disease-Gene Association Network,


https://www.disgenet.org/), the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (OMIM: https://www.omim.org/), and the Therapeutic Target Database (TTD: https://db.idrblab.net/ttd/). These


targets were merged and deduplicated using the UniProt database. The results were then combined with differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the GEO database, with duplicate entries


removed to establish a comprehensive disease target dataset. CONSTRUCTION OF PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORK AND CORE TARGET SCREENING The intersection of potential targets for SBD and


OA was identified using the Venn platform, generating a Venn diagram. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for intersecting genes was constructed using the STRING (Search Tool for the


Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins, https://cn.string-db.org/), with “Homo sapiens” as the target species and a confidence threshold of “high confidence” (≥ 0.700)19,20. Finally,


Cytoscape (version 3.10.2, https://cytoscape.org/) and the CytoHubba plugin were employed to analyze three key metrics: degree centrality (Degree), maximal clique centrality (MCC), and


network centrality (MNC). The six highest-ranked genes were selected to establish the core target network. CONSTRUCTION OF THE DRUG-ACTIVE COMPONENT-COMMON TARGET NETWORK A network diagram


was generated using Cytoscape to depict the interactions among drugs, active components, and shared targets. This visualization enhances the understanding of compound-target relationships


and their potential mechanisms of action. GO AND KEGG ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS GO (Gene Ontology, http://geneontology.org/) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes,


https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) enrichment analyses were conducted in the R environment. The org.Hs.eg.db package (version 3.2.0, https://bioconductor.org/packages/org.Hs.eg.db/) was employed


for gene annotation, while the clusterProfiler package (version 4.14.4, https://bioconductor.org/packages/clusterProfiler/) facilitated gene ID conversion and pathway enrichment analysis of


the identified common targets21. These methods accurately identified GO terms related to biological processes, molecular functions, and cellular components associated with SBD. KEGG pathway


enrichment analysis was also performed22. The results were visualized using the ggplot2 package, offering a clear presentation of enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways to support further


research. TARGET-KEGG NETWORK CONSTRUCTION A network illustrating interactions between common targets and KEGG pathways was constructed using Cytoscape. The “Network Analyzer” module was


used to analyze network properties. Targets meeting three critical indicators—Degree, MCC, and MNC—were identified as core targets. MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION The full names of key target


proteins were verified using the UniProt database, and their corresponding three-dimensional (3D) structures were obtained from the PDB (Protein Data Bank, https://www.rcsb.org/) database.


The selected protein structures included IL1B (PDB ID: 8RYS), IL6 (PDB ID: 1IL6), TNF (PDB ID: 1TNF), JNK (PDB ID: 4QTD), and STAT3 (PDB ID: 6NJS). Using PyMOL (version 3.1,


https://pymol.org/), water molecules were removed from the protein structures. The three-dimensional (3D) molecular structures of key active compounds were retrieved from the PubChem and


TCMSP databases. Using OpenBabel (version 2.3.2, https://openbabel.org/), these structures were converted from SDF format to mol2 format for molecular docking analysis. Hydrogen atoms were


added, and charges were calculated with AutoDockTools (version 1.5.7, http://autodock.scripps.edu/resources/adt) to prepare the proteins for molecular docking23. After target annotation,


docking was conducted using AutoDockTools24. Binding energy heatmaps were generated using the ggplot2 package in R to illustrate the docking affinities. To validate the RMSD values, ensure


that the RMSD is less than 2.0 Å to confirm the reliability of the docking results. Two-dimensional interaction diagrams were generated using Discovery Studio Visualizer (version 19.1,


​https://discover.3ds.com/discovery-studio-visualizer-download)25,26. Finally, 3D images were generated using PyMOL. MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION Based on the molecular docking results from


AutoDock, the top-ranked model was selected as the starting point for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The Amber99sb force field was used to characterize proteins, while the GAFF force


field was applied to ligands. Topology files for each ligand were generated using the Sobtop tool (v.3.1, https://www.sobtop.com/). MD simulations were conducted using GROMACS (version


2020.6, http://www.gromacs.org/)27, with each complex solvated in an SPC water model and neutralized with sodium and chloride ions. Energy minimization was conducted to optimize the system,


followed by a gradual temperature increase to 300 K over 200 ns. Subsequently, a 2-ns NPT equilibration was performed at 1 bar to stabilize the system. Finally, a 200-ns production molecular


dynamics simulation was executed under controlled conditions of 300 K and 1 bar, with a timestep of 2 fs. The cutoff distance for van der Waals and short-range electrostatic interactions


was set at 1.0 nm. The LINCS algorithm was used to constrain hydrogen bonds, with V-rescale and Berendsen methods employed to maintain stable temperature and pressure conditions. During the


MD simulation, several parameters were analyzed to assess the conformational stability of the protein-ligand complex, including root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square


fluctuation (RMSF), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), radius of gyration (Rg), hydrogen bonds (HB), and principal component analysis (PCA). The MM/PBSA (Molecular


Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area) method was applied to calculate the binding free energy, providing insights into the thermodynamic stability of the complex. DRUG PREPARATION AND


CELL CULTURE The eight herbal components of SBD were ground into a fine powder in proportion and dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 1 g/mL, The mixture was then centrifuged


at 5000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant was collected and filtered using a 0.22 μm microporous membrane to obtain the 1 g/mL crude extract, which was stored at − 80 °C. Murine


macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells (Catalog No. JW-CL-0582) were purchased from Shanghai Jiwei Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The cells were cultured in DMEM high-glucose medium supplemented with 10%


fetal bovine serum (FBS) under standard conditions of 37 °C with 5% CO₂. CCK-8 CELL VIABILITY ASSAY Cell viability was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Catalog No. CK04-500).


Briefly, RAW264.7 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 7.5 × 10³ cells/well and incubated for 24 h. The cells were then treated with SBD at concentrations of 12.5, 25, 50,


100, 200, and 400 µg/mL for 24 h. After treatment, 10µL of CCK-8 reagent was added to each well, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 1 h. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm


using a microplate reader. Cell viability was calculated using the standard formula, and the experimental data were visualized using GraphPad Prism 9.5. REAL-TIME QUANTITATIVE PCR (RT-QPCR)


ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION RAW264.7 cells were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated for 24 h. Cells in the control group were treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), while the OA


group and SBD group were stimulated with LPS (100 ng/mL) for 2 h. Subsequently, the SBD group was treated with SBD for 24 h. After treatment, the culture medium was discarded, and the cells


were washed with PBS. Total RNA was extracted using an RNA extraction kit, followed by reverse transcription into cDNA using a reverse transcription kit. qPCR was performed using cDNA as a


template on the LightCycler®96 system with the following primer sequences: IL1-β: Forward: 5′-TGCCACCTTTTGACAGTGATG-3′. Reverse: 5′-ATGTGCTGCTGCGAGATTTG-3′. IL-6: Forward:


5′-GGAGCCCACCAAGAACGATAG-3′. Reverse: 5′-GTGAAGTAGGGAAGGCCGTG-3′. TNF: Forward: 5′-CCCTCACACTCAGATCATCTTCT-3′. Reverse: 5′-GCTACGACGTGGGCTACAG-3′. STAT3: Forward: 5′-CCGCAGCTTGGGCTGGAAGA-3′.


Reverse: 5′-CAGGGCCGGGCTGTGGTAGT-3′. JNK: Forward: 5′-GTGGAATCAAGCACCTTCACT-3′. Reverse: 5′-TCCTCGCCAGTCCAAAATCAA-3′. GAPDH (Internal control): Forward: 5′-TGGATTTGGACGCATTGGTC-3′. Reverse:


5′-TTTGCACTGGTACGTGTTGAT-3′. All primers were synthesized by Nanning GenSys Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The 2−∆∆Ct method was used to calculate the fold change in gene expression, normalized to


GAPDH. Experimental data were visualized using GraphPad Prism 9.5 software. DETECTION OF ROS SCAVENGING ABILITY USING THE DCFH PROBE RAW264.7 cells were seeded into 12-well plates and


incubated for 24 h. The grouping and treatment methods were the same as in Section “Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of gene expression”. After treatment, the cells were washed


with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with the DCFH-DA fluorescent probe. Fluorescence imaging was performed using a FITC channel, and fluorescence intensity was quantified


using ImageJ software, normalized, and visualized using GraphPad Prism 9.5 software. IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE STAINING RAW264.7 cells were seeded into 12-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The


grouping and treatment methods were the same as in Section “Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of gene expression”. After treatment, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4%


paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with Triton X-100, and blocked with a blocking solution. Cells were then incubated with JNK Polyclonal antibody (Cat No. 51153-1-AP), followed by incubation


with a FITC-labeled secondary antibody (BA1105) for fluorescence detection. Finally, nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. Fluorescence images were captured under a fluorescence microscope,


and fluorescence intensity was quantified using ImageJ software, normalized, and visualized using GraphPad Prism 9.5 software. WESTERN BLOT ANALYSIS RAW264.7 cells were seeded into 6-well


plates and incubated for 24 h under standard conditions. Cell grouping and treatment were performed as described in Section “Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis of gene


expression”. Following treatment, cells were washed with PBS, and total protein was extracted using RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with PMSF and phosphatase inhibitors. The protein lysates


were separated via SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a PVDF membrane, and subsequently blocked. The membrane was then incubated with a JNK polyclonal antibody (Cat No. 51153-1-AP), followed by an


HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Cat No. SA00001-2) after PBS washing. Protein bands were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system, and their intensities


were quantified with ImageJ software. The data were then normalized and graphically presented using GraphPad Prism 9.5. RESULTS IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENES (DEGS) After


data preprocessing, 432 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in osteoarthritis (OA) tissues (Fig. 2A). Among them, 199 genes were downregulated, and 233 genes were


upregulated. The top 50 most significantly upregulated and downregulated genes were selected for further analysis (Fig. 2B). IDENTIFICATION OF ACTIVE COMPONENTS AND THEIR CORRESPONDING


TARGETS IN SBD By integrating data from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP) database and eliminating duplicates, 114 potentially active compounds were identified


across different herbal sources: Aconite (2 compounds), Angelica sinensis (2 compounds), Saposhnikovia divaricata (18 compounds), Coix lacryma-jobi (6 compounds), Glycyrrhiza uralensis (87


compounds), Notopterygium incisum (13 compounds), Gelsemium elegans (1 compound), and Gentiana macrophylla (1 compound). Utilizing the UniProt database for subsequent verification and


refinement, we ultimately identified targets from Aconite (4 targets), Angelica sinensis (42 targets), Saposhnikovia divaricata (64 targets), Coix lacryma-jobi (27 targets), Glycyrrhiza


uralensis (199 targets), Notopterygium incisum (37 targets), Gelsemium elegans (19 targets), and Gentiana macrophylla (27 targets). For additional details, please consult the supplementary


materials. POTENTIAL OA-RELATED TARGET GENES Using databases such as GeneCards, DISGENET, OMIM, and TTD, 2,046 target genes related to OA were identified after removing duplicates (Fig. 3A).


CONSTRUCTION OF PPI NETWORK Venn diagram analysis identified 113 overlapping targets between SBD and OA, highlighting potential therapeutic targets (Fig. 3B). These targets were imported


into the STRING database with a high-confidence threshold of 0.700 for PPI network construction (Fig. 3C). Analysis using Cytoscape (v3.10.2) revealed 107 genes and 930 edges in the network.


The CytoHubba plugin identified key genes based on Degree, MCC, and MNC metrics (Figs. 3D–F). DRUG-ACTIVE INGREDIENT-COMMON TARGET NETWORK To clarify the interactions between SBD active


compounds and their targets, a drug-active ingredient-target network was established (Fig. 4). This network comprised 237 nodes, including 1 formula name, 1 disease name, 8 herbal sources,


114 active compounds, and 113 target genes, interconnected by 948 edges. GO AND KEGG PATHWAY ENRICHMENT ANALYSIS To gain a clear understanding of the functions of the intersecting genes, GO


(Gene Ontology) functional enrichment and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway enrichment analyses were conducted on 113 intersecting targets using R software (v4.4.1) with


a significance threshold of _P_ < 0.05. GO analysis revealed that the biological processes (BP) were predominantly associated with antioxidant responses, TNF-mediated signaling pathways,


cellular responses to bacterial components and lipopolysaccharides, as well as inflammation-related mechanisms, including cell proliferation and the regulation of apoptotic signaling


pathways. The cellular component (CC) was mainly regions such as membrane rafts, membrane microdomains, vesicular lumens, secretory granule lumens, and the outer mitochondrial membrane; the


molecular function (MF) was primarily related to ligand activity, DNA-binding transcription factor binding, protein kinase regulatory activity, and receptor binding functions. The top 10


terms for biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF) were visualized using multiple chart formats with the ggplot2 package (Fig. 5A). KEGG pathway


analysis identified 175 significantly enriched pathways (_P_ < 0.05), with key pathways including lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis, the RAGE signaling pathway in AGE-related diabetic


complications, the IL-17 signaling pathway, and the TNF signaling pathway. The top 30 pathways were visualized using the ggplot2 package (Fig. 5B). The roles of the AGE-RAGE signaling


pathway and IL-17 signaling pathway are particularly significant in the regulation of inflammation and oxidative stress by SBD in OA (Fig. 5C,D). TARGET-KEGG NETWORK CONSTRUCTION To clarify


the interconnections between SBD targets and pathways in OA treatment, we established a drug-active compound-common target-KEGG network. This network consisted of 267 nodes, including 4 core


targets, 109 additional targets, 30 pathways, and 1,608 edges (Fig. 6). Among them, the 4 core targets, which hold significant positions in Degree, MCC, and MNC analyses, were selected for


subsequent molecular docking studies. MOLECULAR DOCKING The core active compounds (Shinflavanone, Gancaonin L, Xambioona, Phaseol, Gancaonin O, and Licoisoflavanone) were used as ligands,


while key therapeutic proteins (IL6, TNF, STAT3, IL1B, and JNK) were chosen based on their hydrogen bonding interactions and binding energies. The results were displayed as binding energy


heatmaps using ggplot2 (Fig. 7A). Notably, JNK acts as an upstream regulator of IL6, TNF, and IL1B. Shinflavanone showed the lowest binding energy with IL1B, JNK, and STAT3, mainly


interacting through hydrogen bonds (VAL A:41; ASN A:114) and Van der Waals forces (CYS A:251; ASP A:334) in the binding pocket. Xambioona had the strongest affinity for IL6, stabilizing the


protein-ligand complex via hydrogen bonding (VAL A:97) and Van der Waals interactions (LEU A:93; ASN A:145). Gancaonin L exhibited the lowest binding energy with TNF, forming a stable


complex primarily through Van der Waals forces (SER B:99) (see Supplementary Material S4 for details). The best-performing candidates for each complex were visualized using PyMOL and


Discovery Studio (Fig. 7B–E). Additionally, three independent docking repetitions produced consistent and stable conformations, validating the reliability of molecular docking performed with


AutoDockTools. MD SIMULATION Based on the molecular docking results, 200-ns MD simulations were performed for the following protein-ligand complexes: Xambioona_IL6, Gancaonin L_TNF,


Shinflavanone_STAT3, Shinflavanone_JNK, and Shinflavanone_IL1B. The stability of the trajectory files was assessed using multiple metrics, including root-mean-square deviation (RMSD),


root-mean-square fluctuation (RMSF), radius of gyration (Rg), solvent-accessible surface area (SASA), hydrogen bond dynamics (HB), and principal component analysis-free energy landscape


(PCA). As shown in Fig. 8A, the RMSD variations for all ligands remained below 0.1 nm, indicating high stability of the ligands throughout the simulation. The RMSD profile of the


Shinflavanone_IL1B complex exhibited noticeable fluctuations, suggesting structural and conformational changes due to protein folding. In contrast, the other complexes displayed relatively


stable RMSD profiles throughout the simulation. As shown in Fig. 8B–D, the Shinflavanone_IL1B complex demonstrated increased flexibility in two regions (31–38 and 48–56), while the


Shinflavanone_STAT3 complex exhibited similar flexibility in the 170–220 region. The Xambioona_IL6 complex displayed flexibility in three regions (42–70, 71–81, and 130–170). The Rg and SASA


analyses revealed low fluctuation levels, indicating greater overall structural stability of the complexes. HB analysis revealed fewer than four hydrogen bonds between the molecules,


suggesting that the interactions were primarily driven by van der Waals forces, which was further corroborated by the subsequent MM-PBSA analysis (Fig. 8E). PCA plots during molecular


dynamics simulation revealed the dominant conformational changes and dynamic behaviors of the protein throughout the simulation (Fig. 8F). The MM-PBSA results, used to quantify the binding


free energy of the complexes (see Supplementary Material S5 for details), confirmed that all ligand-protein complexes exhibited favorable binding affinity. EFFECTS OF SBD ON CELL VIABILITY


As shown in Fig. 9A, CCK-8 assay results indicate that SBD treatment does not exhibit significant cytotoxicity at concentrations up to 100 µg/mL, However, at 200 µg/mL, a noticeable decrease


in cell viability was observed. In the concentration range of 12.5–100 µg/mL, cell viability remained stable with a slight proliferative effect. Therefore, 100 µg/mL was selected as the


non-cytotoxic concentration for subsequent experiments, ensuring both safety and therapeutic efficacy. EFFECTS OF SBD ON INFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS AND ROS QRT-PCR analysis revealed that LPS


stimulation significantly induced the expression of inflammatory cytokines, while SBD treatment markedly downregulated the mRNA levels of JNK, STAT3, IL1B, IL6, and TNF (Fig. 9B–F). As shown


in Fig. 10A and B, LPS stimulation led to a significant increase in ROS levels, with a noticeable enhancement in fluorescence intensity. However, SBD treatment significantly reduced


fluorescence intensity and ROS levels, indicating its potential anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. EFFECTS OF SBD ON JNK AXIS As illustrated in Fig. 11A–D, immunofluorescence, and


Western blot analysis demonstrated that LPS stimulation significantly increased JNK levels, leading to elevated fluorescence intensity and gene expression. After SBD treatment, both


fluorescence intensity and JNK were significantly reduced, suggesting that SBD effectively inhibits JNK activation. DISCUSSION Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common orthopedic disease that imposes


a substantial burden on society. Its prevalence increases with age, making OA an emerging global public health issue. Studies indicate that Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) shows


potential in treating various chronic diseases and tumors28,29,30,31. We employed a network pharmacology-based computational approach, combined with molecular docking, molecular dynamics


simulation, and experimental validation, to explore the potential mechanisms of SBD in the treatment of OA. Through an analysis of multiple databases, including GEO, we identified 114 active


chemical components and 113 intersecting targets, screening six active compounds with excellent binding affinities to core targets. Shinflavanone is an effective bone resorption inhibitor,


suggesting its potential to reverse OA pathology32. Gancaonin L and Gancaonin O, flavonoid compounds extracted from licorice, possess immunomodulatory and other biological activities, making


them promising candidates for OA treatment. Xambioona, a natural plant-derived compound, and its therapeutic mechanism in OA remain underexplored. Phaseol, a bioactive compound derived from


legumes, holds antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic potential. Licorisoflavanone, an isoflavonoid compound, may have a bone-repairing effect. By utilizing Cytoscape software and


PPI network analysis, we identified four core targets from the compound-drug-component-disease-target network. The inflammatory cytokine Interleukin-1 beta(IL1β) induces an inflammatory


phenotype characterized by increased RANKL and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)33. Additionally, IL-1β enhances the production of inflammatory cytokines like Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) and


Interleukin-6(IL-6), exacerbating OA-related inflammation34. IL-1B inhibitors significantly reduce OA progression by preserving cartilage integrity and minimizing lesion size35. Elevated


IL-6 levels are associated with increased pain, stiffness, and radiographic severity36. Excessive IL-6 production negatively affects the synthesis of cartilage matrix proteins, accelerating


cartilage degradation37. Targeting IL-6 can alleviate its harmful effects on cartilage metabolism38. TNF influences various cellular processes that lead to cartilage degeneration and joint


pathology39. TNF plays a critical role in OA by activating signaling pathways such as NF-kappa B, MAPK, and PI3K/Akt, promoting inflammatory cell recruitment and chondrocyte degradation40.


TNF inhibitors have been shown to have the potential for inflammation relief and cartilage protection41. Activation of STAT3 is associated with the expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF42,43.


The signal transducer and activator of transcription 3(STAT3) is involved in regulating chondrocyte apoptosis44,45. Therefore, simultaneously targeting these targets offers significant


potential for the treatment of OA. In the Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, Biological Processes (BP) were significantly associated with inflammation and cellular stress, including antioxidant


responses, TNF-mediated signaling, cellular responses to bacterial components and lipopolysaccharides, as well as the modulation of cell proliferation and apoptotic pathways. Cellular


Components (CC) were significantly enriched in regions such as lipid rafts, membrane microdomains, vesicle lumen, secretory granule lumen, and mitochondrial outer membrane, indicating that


these cellular components play crucial roles in inflammatory signaling and functional regulation. Molecular Functions (MF) involve ligand activity, DNA-binding transcription factor binding,


protein kinase regulatory activity, and receptor binding, which are likely associated with signal transduction and transcriptional regulation. GO analysis revealed the multidimensional roles


of SBD in cellular functions and processes. In the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis, SBD may be multi-pathway synergistic in OA treatment. Key inflammation- and


immune-related pathways, including the AGE-RAGE pathway, TNF signaling pathway, IL-17 signaling pathway, and Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, indicate that SBD may exert therapeutic


effects on OA by regulating these signaling cascades. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a key driver of OA progression, playing a crucial role in inflammation and cartilage degradation in the


pathology of OA46. The AGE-RAGE axis enhances ROS generation while simultaneously inhibiting antioxidant enzyme activity, thereby weakening cellular defenses against oxidative stress47.


Increased oxidative stress leads to DNA damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in chondrocytes, exacerbating cartilage degeneration and inflammation48. The JNK axis is a key component in the


AGE-RAGE signaling pathway. JNK is considered a precursor of NF-κB. It not only exacerbates the inflammatory cascade but also promotes apoptosis by regulating the STAT349. Continued


activation of the JNK signaling pathway is implicated in cartilage degeneration and chronic synovial inflammation, making it a significant therapeutic target for OA50,51. Inhibiting JNK


expression helps alleviate the persistent cartilage degeneration and chronic inflammation in OA52. Inhibiting STAT3 activation is crucial in the progression of OA and cartilage damage53.


IL-17 signaling pathway is closely associated with OA progression. The crosstalk between the IL-17 pathway and the AGE-RAGE pathway may involve JNK, which activates NF-κB, triggering


inflammation and cartilage degradation, thereby further activating the IL-17 pathway54. Another study suggested the IL-17 axis as a novel therapeutic strategy for OA55. In OA animal models,


SPHK2 knockdown inhibited the IL-17 pathway and alleviated cartilage damage and synovial inflammation56. In rat chondrocytes, TNF has been shown to increase senescence markers and


glycosaminoglycan (GAG) degradation57. Clinical studies have demonstrated the potential of TNF inhibitors in treating arthritis58. Research indicates that IL-17 A and TNF synergistically


induce pro-inflammatory mediators in synovial fibroblasts, accelerating OA progression59. Overall, enrichment analysis suggests that SBD may effectively treat OA through multi-gene,


multi-pathway mechanisms. Using three algorithms (Degree Centrality, Maximum Clique Centrality, and Mean Nearest Neighbor Centrality), the top four core (IL1B, STAT3, IL6, TNF) genes were


identified. Furthermore, within the AGE-RAGE pathway, JNK is a common upstream target for the four core targets and ranks highly. Therefore, this study specifically explores the relationship


between the JNK axis in the AGE-RAGE pathway and OA. Molecular docking simulations suggest that the six key compounds (Shinflavanone, Gancaonin L, Xambioona, Phaseol, Gancaonin O, and


Licoisoflavanone) exhibit significant binding activity with the five target proteins (IL1B, STAT3, IL6, TNF, and JNK) under investigation. Shinflavanone exhibited the highest docking score


with JNK, demonstrating stable hydrogen bonds and strong van der Waals interactions. Shinflavanone_IL1B, Xambioona_IL6, Shinflavanone_STAT3, and Gancaonin L_TNF also showed favorable


interactions, primarily characterized by strong van der Waals forces and hydrophobic interactions. Molecular dynamics simulations further validated this finding by demonstrating the dynamic


stability of these interactions in solution. Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) and Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF) analyses indicated that all ligand-protein complexes exhibited


relatively stable conformations, with Shinflavanone_JNK showing particularly stable behavior. The radius of gyration (Rg) and solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) analysis demonstrated the


stability of the binding interface throughout the simulation. The consistent number of hydrogen bonds (HB) maintained throughout the simulation also supports the stability of the complex


over time. The MM-PBSA method can quantitatively analyze the binding energy of ligand-protein complexes, offering unique advantages. MM-PBSA analysis further validated the dynamic stability


of these complexes. In conclusion, all complexes exhibited significant stability, providing strong theoretical support and data evidence for the development of new therapeutic approaches. To


validate the effects of SBD, we conducted in vitro experimental validation. The results indicate that SBD effectively scavenges ROS and inhibits the expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, STAT3,


and JNK. This significantly highlights the potential of SBD in alleviating oxidative stress, exerting anti-inflammatory effects, and inhibiting cartilage degradation. In addition, both


immunofluorescence (IF) and Western blot (WB) experiments have demonstrated the importance of the JNK axis in the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway. Compared to conventional anti-inflammatory


therapies such as NSAIDs and biologics, SBD may exert a broader regulatory effect by simultaneously targeting multiple inflammatory mediators. In conclusion, Experimental validation further


supports the hypothesis that SBD alleviates OA by regulating the JNK axis within the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway, thereby disrupting the pathological loop in which JNK activation induces ROS


production, which in turn amplifies AGE-RAGE signaling, exacerbating inflammation and tissue damage. By breaking this vicious cycle, SBD may mitigate inflammatory responses and preserve


joint integrity. Future studies should explore its potential in combination with standard therapies to enhance efficacy and reduce adverse effects, offering a novel multi-targeted strategy


for OA management. CONCLUSION This study comprehensively explored the potential of SBD in the treatment of OA through network pharmacology, molecular docking, MD simulations, and


experimental validation. The results indicate that SBD may exert therapeutic effects on key inflammatory targets in OA through its key components, including Shinflavanone, Gancaonin L,


Xambioona, Phaseol, Gancaonin O, and Licoisoflavanone. Moreover, we validated that SBD alleviates oxidative stress, exhibits anti-inflammatory effects, and protects cartilage through the JNK


pathway. Overall, our findings confirm the reliability of computational techniques and highlight the potential of SBD as a therapeutic agent for OA (Fig. 12). DATA AVAILABILITY The novel


contributions of this study are detailed in the article and its supplementary materials. For any additional information, please contact the corresponding author. REFERENCES * Gelber, A. C.


Knee osteoarthritis. _Ann. Intern. Med._ 177. https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-24-01249 (2024). * Englund, M. Osteoarthritis, part of life or a curable disease? A bird’s-eye view. _J. Intern.


Med._ 293, 681–693. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13634 (2023). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Steinmetz, J. D.et al. Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990–2020


and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. _Lancet Rheumatol._ 5, e508–e522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00163-7 (2023). * Zhang,


S. et al. Therapeutic potential of traditional Chinese medicine against osteoarthritis: targeting the Wnt signaling pathway. _Am. J. Chin. Med._ 52, 2021–2052.


https://doi.org/10.1142/s0192415x24500782 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zhou, G. et al. Research progress on the treatment of knee osteoarthritis combined with osteoporosis


by single-herb Chinese medicine and compound. _Front. Med. (Lausanne)_. 10, 1254086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1254086 (2023). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, L. et al.


Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese medicine on osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. _Pain Res. Manag_. 2020, 5712187.


https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5712187 (2020). * Wang, M. et al. Mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine in treating knee osteoarthritis. _J. Pain Res._ 13, 1421–1429.


https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.S247827 (2020). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Xu, Z. et al. Exploring the mechanism of action of modified Simiao powder in the treatment of


osteoarthritis: an in-silico study. _Front. Med. (Lausanne)_. 11, 1422306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1422306 (2024). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Padhee, S. et al.


Identification of the active constituents and molecular mechanism of Eulophia Nuda extract in the treatment of osteoarthritis by network pharmacology, molecular modeling, and experimental


assays. _Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol._ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03459-z (2024). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Padhee, S. et al. Exploring the mechanism of action of


Vanda tessellate extract for the treatment of osteoarthritis through network pharmacology, molecular modeling, and experimental assays. _Heliyon_ 10, e35971.


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35971 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Tanoli, Z., Schulman, A. & Aittokallio, T. Validation guidelines for


drug-target prediction methods. _Expert Opin. Drug Discov._ 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2430955 (2024). * Filipe, H. A. L. & Loura, L. M. S. Molecular dynamics


simulations: Advances and applications. _Molecules_ 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27072105 (2022). * Aranda-Garcia, D. et al. (2022). * Parise, A., Cresca, S. & Magistrato, A.


Molecular dynamics simulations for the structure-based drug design: targeting small-GTPases proteins. _Expert Opin. Drug Discov_. 19, 1259–1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2387856


(2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yang, M. et al. Molecular mechanism of Dang-Shen-Yu-Xing Decoction against Mycoplasma bovis pneumonia based on network pharmacology,


molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, and experimental verification. _Front. Vet. Sci._ 11, 1431233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1431233 (2024). Article  PubMed  PubMed


Central  Google Scholar  * Li, X. et al. Combining network pharmacology, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and experimental verification to examine the efficacy and


immunoregulation mechanism of FHB granules on vitiligo. _Front. Immunol._ 14, 1194823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1194823 (2023). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar


  * Miao, J. et al. Exploring the therapeutic mechanisms of Yikang Decoction in polycystic ovary syndrome: an integration of GEO datasets, network pharmacology, and molecular dynamics


simulations. _Front. Med._ 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1455964 (2024). * Hua, Y. et al. Deciphering the Pharmacological mechanism of Radix astragali for allergic rhinitis through


network Pharmacology and experimental validation. _Sci. Rep._ 14, 29873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80101-1 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  *


Klockmeier, K., Silva Ramos, E., Raskó, T., Martí Pastor, A. & Wanker, E. E. Schizophrenia risk candidate protein ZNF804A interacts with STAT2 and influences interferon-mediated gene


transcription in mammalian cells. _J. Mol. Biol._ 433, 167184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167184 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Choudhary, N., Choudhary, S., Kumar,


A. & Singh, V. Deciphering the multi-scale mechanisms of Tephrosia purpurea against polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and its major psychiatric comorbidities: studies from network


Pharmacological perspective. _Gene_ 773, 145385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.145385 (2021). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y.


ClusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. _Omics_ 16, 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118 (2012). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 


Google Scholar  * Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 51,


D587–d592. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac963 (2023). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Trott, O. & Olson, A. J. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of Docking with a


new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. _J. Comput. Chem._ 31, 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334 (2010). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google


Scholar  * Morris, G. M. et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated Docking with selective receptor flexibility. _J. Comput. Chem._ 30, 2785–2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256


(2009). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Cheng, T., Li, X., Li, Y., Liu, Z. & Wang, R. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set. _J. Chem.


Inf. Model._ 49, 1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci9000053 (2009). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Yin, B., Bi, Y. M., Fan, G. J. & Xia, Y. Q. Molecular Mechanism of the


Effect of Huanglian Jiedu Decoction on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking. _J. Diabetes Res._, 5273914. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5273914 (2020).


* Pronk, S. et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. _Bioinformatics_ 29, 845–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055


(2013). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Liu, Y. et al. Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of chronic atrophic gastritis, precancerous lesions, and gastric


cancer. _J. Ethnopharmacol._ 337, 118812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2024.118812 (2025). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang, M. et al. Traditional Chinese medicine enhances the


effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in tumor treatment: A mechanism discussion. _J. Ethnopharmacol._ 338, 118955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2024.118955 (2025). Article  CAS 


PubMed  Google Scholar  * Tan, P. et al. Application of omics technologies in studies on antitumor effects of traditional Chinese medicine. _Chin. Med._ 19, 123.


https://doi.org/10.1186/s13020-024-00995-x (2024). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhao, M., Che, Y., Gao, Y. & Zhang, X. Application of multi-omics in the study of


traditional Chinese medicine. _Front. Pharmacol._ 15, 1431862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1431862 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Suh, H., Lee, S.,


Kim, N., Han, J. & Kim, J. Syntheses of (+/-)-shin-flavanone and its structural analogs as potent inhibitors of bone resorption pits formation. _Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett._ 9, 1433–1436.


https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-894x(99)00212-7 (1999). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Arra, M., Swarnkar, G., Alippe, Y., Mbalaviele, G. & Abu-Amer, Y. IκB-ζ signaling promotes


chondrocyte inflammatory phenotype, senescence, and erosive joint pathology. _Bone Res._ 10, 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-021-00183-9 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 


Google Scholar  * Mu, Y., Wang, L., Fu, L. & Li, Q. Knockdown of LMX1B suppressed cell apoptosis and inflammatory response in IL-1β-induced human osteoarthritis chondrocytes through


NF-κB and NLRP3 signal pathway. _Mediators Inflamm._ 1870579 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1870579 (2022). * Aman, Z. S. et al. Acute intervention with selective Interleukin-1


inhibitor therapy May reduce the progression of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the knee: A systematic review of current evidence. _Arthroscopy_ 38, 2543–2556.


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.02.009 (2022). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Ahmed, R., Soliman, N. & Elwan, S. Relationships between serum Interleukin-6, radiographic


severity a WOMAC index in patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. (2023). * Eitner, A. et al. Importance of IL-6 trans-signaling and high autocrine IL-6 production in human Osteoarthritic


chondrocyte metabolism. _Osteoarthr. Cartil._ 32, 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2024.02.006 (2024). Article  Google Scholar  * Shanshal, A., Hisham, R. & Hussain, S. Targeting


IL-6 signaling pathways for musculoskeletal disorders treatment: Risks and benefits. _Al-Rafidain J. Med. Sci._ 4, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v4i.101 (2023). * Fedulichev, P. N.


The role of immune factors in the etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. _Сибирский Научный Медицинский Журнал_ (2023). * Guo, Y. et al. Kongensin A targeting PI3K attenuates


inflammation-induced osteoarthritis by modulating macrophage polarization and alleviating inflammatory signaling. _Int. Immunopharmacol._ 142, 112948.


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112948 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Valerio, M. S. et al. Effect of targeted cytokine Inhibition on progression of post-traumatic


osteoarthritis following Intra-Articular fracture. _Int. J. Mol. Sci._ 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713606 (2023). * Lu, X. et al. Selective STAT3 inhibitor STX-0119 alleviates


osteoarthritis progression by modulating the STAT3/PPARγ signaling pathway. _Biochem. Pharmacol._ 227, 116420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116420 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google


Scholar  * Moon, J. et al. Small heterodimer partner-interacting leucine zipper protein suppresses pain and cartilage destruction in an osteoarthritis model by modulating the AMPK/STAT3


signaling pathway. _Arthritis Res. Ther._ 26, 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03417-3 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Li, J., Yin, Z., Huang, B., Xu,


K. & Su, J. Stat3 signaling pathway: A future therapeutic target for Bone-Related diseases. _Front. Pharmacol._ 13, 897539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.897539 (2022). Article  CAS


  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kaneko, Y. et al. The Stat3 inhibitor F0648-0027 is a potential therapeutic against rheumatoid arthritis. _Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun._ 636,


133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.10.106 (2022). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Fang, D. et al. Ros-responsive nanocomposite scaffolds for sustained releasing puerarin to


achieve chondroprotection in OA rats. _Mater. Design_. 233, 112214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112214 (2023). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Bhattacharya, R., Alam, M. R.,


Kamal, M. A., Seo, K. J. & Singh, L. R. AGE-RAGE axis culminates into multiple pathogenic processes: a central road to neurodegeneration. _Front. Mol. Neurosci._ 16, 1155175.


https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2023.1155175 (2023). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Coryell, P. R., Diekman, B. O. & Loeser, R. F. Mechanisms and therapeutic


implications of cellular senescence in osteoarthritis. _Nat. Rev. Rheumatol._ 17, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-00533-7 (2021). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Nadel, G.,


Maik-Rachline, G. & Seger, R. J. N. K. Cascade-Induced apoptosis-A unique role in GqPCR signaling. _Int. J. Mol. Sci._ 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713527 (2023). * 50 Chen, B.,


Ning, K., Sun, M. L. & Zhang, X. A. Regulation and therapy, the role of JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in OA: a systematic review. _Cell. Commun. Signal._ 21, 67.


https://doi.org/10.1186/s12964-023-01094-4 (2023). Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Zhou, Q. et al. The potential roles of JAK/STAT signaling in the progression of


osteoarthritis. _Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)_. 13, 1069057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1069057 (2022). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * 52 Qian, Z. et al. AFK-PD alleviated


osteoarthritis progression by chondroprotective and anti-inflammatory activity. _Front. Pharmacol._ 15, 1439678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1439678 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed 


PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Li, J. et al. Endothelial Stat3 activation promotes osteoarthritis development. _Cell. Prolif._ 56, e13518. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.13518 (2023).


Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Xiao, J. et al. IL-17 in osteoarthritis: A narrative review. _Open. Life Sci._ 18, 20220747. https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0747


(2023). Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Hsieh, S. L. et al. MCP-1 controls IL-17-promoted monocyte migration and M1 polarization in osteoarthritis. _Int.


Immunopharmacol._ 132, 112016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112016 (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Zheng, J. et al. SPHK2 knockdown inhibits the proliferation and


migration of Fibroblast-Like synoviocytes through the IL-17 signaling pathway in osteoarthritis. _J. Inflamm. Res._ 17, 7221–7234. https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.S476077 (2024). Article  PubMed


  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Yagi, M., Endo, K., Komori, K. & Sekiya, I. Comparison of the effects of oxidative and inflammatory stresses on rat chondrocyte senescence. _Sci.


Rep._ 13, 7697. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34825-1 (2023). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Wang, W. et al. Serum IL-40 increases in patients with


rheumatoid arthritis and correlates with some clinical characteristics and comorbidities. _Sci. Rep._ 14, 28945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80104-y (2024). Article  CAS  PubMed 


PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Kouri, V. P. et al. IL-17A and TNF synergistically drive the expression of Proinflammatory mediators in synovial fibroblasts via IκBζ-dependent induction of


ELF3. _Rheumatol. (Oxford)_. 62, 872–885. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac385 (2023). Article  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors sincerely appreciate


the significant contributions of both the researchers and the participants who played an essential role in this study. FUNDING This study received financial support from the Science and


Technology Program Project of Chongzuo City (Grant No. Chong Ke 2023QN035568). AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Zeyu Huang and Xiaohong Jiang. AUTHORS AND


AFFILIATIONS * Department of Orthopedics, Minzu Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, 530001, China Zeyu Huang, Xiaohong Jiang, Wei Xie, Kuicheng Wei & Dehuai Liu * Big


Data Technology Development Division, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Information Center, Nanning, 530221, China Lianlian Zhong * Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School


of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, 530021, China Xiaohong Jiang * Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, 541000, China


Lerong Yang Authors * Zeyu Huang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Xiaohong Jiang View author publications You can also search for this


author inPubMed Google Scholar * Wei Xie View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Kuicheng Wei View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Lerong Yang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Dehuai Liu View author publications You can also


search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Lianlian Zhong View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS Conceptualization and


methodology, Zeyu Huang and Kuicheng Wei; software, Lianlian Zhong, Zeyu Huang; validation, Zeyu Huang, Xiaohong Jiang and Dehuai Liu; formal analysis, Dehuai Liu, Zeyu Huang, Wei Xie and


Kuicheng Wei; investigation and data curation, Zeyu Huang, Wei Xie and Dehuai Liu; writing—original draft preparation, Zeyu Huang and Lianlian Zhong; writing—review and editing, Xiaohong


Jiang, Zeyu Huang, Lerong Yang, Dehuai Liu; visualization, Zeyu Huang, Xiaohong Jiang and Lianlian Zhong; resources, supervision, project administration and funding acquisition, Dehuai Liu.


All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Dehuai Liu or Lianlian Zhong. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The


authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional


affiliations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 1 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 2 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 3


SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 4 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 5 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 6 RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons


Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give


appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission


under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons


licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by


statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit


http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Huang, Z., Jiang, X., Xie, W. _et al._ Mechanistic insights into Sanbi


Decoction for osteoarthritis treatment based on network pharmacology and experimental validation. _Sci Rep_ 15, 18707 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99055-z Download citation *


Received: 26 January 2025 * Accepted: 16 April 2025 * Published: 28 May 2025 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99055-z SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with


will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt


content-sharing initiative KEYWORDS * Sanbi Decoction * Osteoarthritis * Network pharmacology * Molecular docking * Molecular dynamics simulations.