Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Environmental parameters vary in time, and variability is inherent in soils, where microbial activity follows precipitation pulses. The expanded pulse-reserve paradigm (EPRP)
contends that arid soil microorganisms have adaptively diversified in response to pulse regimes differing in frequency and duration. To test this, we incubate Chihuahuan Desert soil
microbiomes under separate treatments in which 60 h of hydration was reached with pulses of different pulse duration (PD), punctuated by intervening periods of desiccation. Using 16S rRNA
gene amplicon data, we measure treatment effects on microbiome net growth, growth efficiency, diversity, and species composition, tracking the fate of 370 phylotypes (23% of those detected).
Consistent with predictions, microbial diversity is a direct, saturating function of PD. Increasingly larger shifts in community composition are detected with decreasing PD, as specialist
phylotypes become more prominent. One in five phylotypes whose fate was tracked responds consistently to PD, some preferring short pulses (nimble responders; NIRs) and some longer pulses
(torpid responders; TORs). For pulses shorter than a day, microbiome growth efficiency is an inverse function of PD, as predicted. We conclude that PD in pulsed soil environments constitutes
a major driver of microbial community assembly and function, largely consistent with the EPRP predictions. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS ELEVATED TEMPERATURE AND CO2 STRONGLY
AFFECT THE GROWTH STRATEGIES OF SOIL BACTERIA Article Open access 24 January 2023 PLANT-ASSOCIATED FUNGI SUPPORT BACTERIAL RESILIENCE FOLLOWING WATER LIMITATION Article Open access 09
September 2022 MICROBIAL GROWTH UNDER DROUGHT IS CONFINED TO DISTINCT TAXA AND MODIFIED BY POTENTIAL FUTURE CLIMATE CONDITIONS Article Open access 22 September 2023 INTRODUCTION Organisms
must acclimate to environmental parameters that typically fluctuate, rather than being constant1,2,3. The consequences of environmental fluctuations may be rather mild, requiring only small
physiological responses to cope. For example, episodes of elevated temperature may be dealt with satisfactorily through the deployment of heat-shock proteins to ensure the correct folding of
proteins under the new conditions4. But fluctuations can also exert severe impacts on physiology, requiring a switch between fundamentally different physiological states characterized by
different biochemical and regulatory blueprints. The purple sulfur bacterium _Thiocapsa roseopersicina_, for example, must toggle quickly and recurrently between aerobic chemolithotrophy and
anaerobic photolithotrophy to match the diel chemical shifts in coastal sulfidic sediments5, requiring extensive biochemical reorganization. Perhaps the most extreme form of fluctuation
crosses environmental thresholds so harsh as to impinge on an organism’s overall metabolic activity: full desiccation or extreme cold come to mind. In ecology, when environmental changes are
recurrent, intense, and involve a parameter necessary for biological activity, one speaks of “activity pulses”, and of “pulsed ecosystems”, of which polar6 or arid environments7 are
quintessential examples. In pulses involving desiccation, the physiological burden to adaptation is compounded by direct cellular damage to the cell membrane8, nucleic acids and proteins9.
While a wealth of examples exists showing evolutionary adaptations leading to the development of specialist “extremophiles”10,11,12, adaptations that provide fitness to organisms
specifically under pulsed conditions are much less obvious. It is even unclear if organisms exist that are evolutionarily specialized to a pulsed existence or to specific types of pulse
regimes. Consistent with this notion, however, experiments with microbial communities in biocrusts have demonstrated that a decrease in precipitation pulse size, but maintaining constant
total rainfall, results in major relative increases for some cyanobacteria over others13, and, similarly, addition of small precipitation pulses gives a field advantage to cyanobacteria over
mosses14. In any event, nowhere are such pulses better defined and more patent than in surface soils from dryland ecosystems, where fluctuations between water saturation and complete
desiccation faithfully follow pulsed rainfall events15. There, microbes must toggle between physiological states geared to support (typically short) pulses of activity when hydrated, and
(typically long) periods of quiescence when dry16,17. This extremely pulsed regime makes arid top-soil microbiomes prime targets of inquiry in this arena. Theoretical considerations suggest
that organisms in pulsed environments are indeed adapted to pulse variability, not just to the end-member situations within a pulse (i.e., high and low salinity, inactive and desiccated vs
active and hydrated, oxic vs. anoxic). In other words, their adaptations are suited to surviving the changes themselves because to transition between appropriate physiological blueprints in
a pulse is costly18,19,20 and it takes time. Time is particularly important under regimes where growth-enabling time is at a premium. The long-standing pulse-reserve paradigm (PRP) of arid
ecosystem function calls for the central role of organismal reserves gathered during times of plenty to power such transitions effectively21,22. Pulse duration (PD) will determine whether
enough reserves can be acquired to eventually start a new growth phase. Short pulses may end up costing more resources than can be acquired, leading to organismal demise. According to
theory23, adaptations to a pulsed existence will fall along a continuum between two end-member strategies. At one end “Nimble Responders (NIRs)” transition swiftly in and out of growth mode
by constantly allocating a proportion of resources to reserves, maintaining a constitutive physiological readiness for inter-pulse conditions, and ensuring that metabolic systems are
inherently hardy and protected. This comes at the cost of depressing their growth potential during the activity pulse; they become inherently slow growers. At the opposite end, “Torpid
Responders (TORs)”, must also allocate resources to reserves to fuel transitions, but they only do so as an activity pulse nears its end. Consequently, TORs fulfill their growth potential
during much of the pulse, unconstrained by allocation to reserves, and they grow swiftly during most of it. But their lag times for transition to dormancy and back into growth are long, as
reserves are synthesized ad hoc at the end of a pulse. TORs also have comparatively long minimal pulse duration for viability. NIRs can be understood as conservative investors, focused on
certainty of returns that are moderate but frequent, while TORs act like risky investors whose strategy relies on high returns that occur rarely. Specific organisms will fall within a
continuum between the extremes exemplified in the NIR and TOR acronyms. The NIR-TOR continuum theory, while consistent with available phenomenology and some anecdotal evidence, has yet to be
tested directly. We sought to conduct an experimental, quantitative test of some of its predictions. Specifically, we asked if one could indeed find evidence for physiological
diversification of soil bacteria along the NIR-TOR continuum, and if this would translate into a community’s overall growth capacity. To do this, we used (heterotrophic) dryland soil
microbiomes from the aphotic zone of biological soil crusts and subjected them to defined pulsed hydration incubation regimes with a diverse carbon source. We then determined the changes
that ensued in basic microbial diversity and growth parameters, as well as the fates of the populations of hundreds of phylotypes as a function of pulse duration to show that, indeed, pulse
duration strongly influences structural and functional properties of microbial communities on soil. MATERIALS AND METHODS SOURCE SOIL AND PREPARATION As a main experimental material, dry
biocrust soil was collected in the Jornada Long Term Experimental Range near Las Cruces, New Mexico (32°34'06.9“N, 106°45'29.4“W). The biocrust were of the light-crust type and
dominated by the cyanobacterium _Microcoleus vaginatus_24. The 2-mm thin phototrophic layer of the biocrust was peeled off the surface by hand, and the soil below was collected down to a
depth of 2 cm. The removal of phototrophs was done for the sake of experimental simplicity since biocrust phototrophs have doubling times in the order of 1–15 days 25, which would have
imposed a far longer experiment, and also to avoid cascading effects since heterotrophs would be dependent on phototrophic exudates. The soil was sifted through a 4.75 mm sieve to remove or
break up larger particles, transported and stored in a closed bucket at room temperature until experiments were started, then homogenized by shaking and mixing by hand. Plates for
incubations were constructed as shown in Fig. 1, provided with sterile paper filters at the bottom and filled with 40 g of homogenized soil to a soil depth of 3–4 mm. All tubing, manifolds,
and plates were either autoclaved or sterilized in ethanol and dried under UV in an engaged laminar flow hood. The incubation plates were assembled using one Petri plate lid and one bottom,
the lid rim glued to the bottom side as shown in Fig. 1A. The bottom section had 30 interspaced holes to allow the exit of the soil solution when under vacuum and the lid had a side hook-up
for a vacuum line. TREATMENTS Five treatments were designed to isolate pulse duration as the independent variable. They included variations of the number and duration of pulses so that all
had a total active (hydrated) time of 60 h. Treatments experienced 12 h long dry periods between pulses. The treatments were: never wet (control), 12 five-hour long wet pulses (5 h), six
ten-hour long wet pulses (10 h), four 15-h long wet pulses (15 h), three 20-h wet pulse (20 h), and one 60-h wet pulse (60 h). A graphic schedule of treatments is in Fig. 1. Desiccation to
5% water content in this set-up was enhanced by vacuum and was attained within 4.3 h after the end of the wet period as measured by a conductivity-based water content miniprobe (UP
Umweltanalytische Produkte GmbH, Ibbenbüren, Germany) in situ (Fig. S1). Plates were kept in an engaged laminar flow hood through the incubation to prevent external contamination. To prepare
an appropriate medium for wetting the soil, the cyanobacterium _Microcoleus vaginatus_ strain PCC9802 was grown in 50% strength BG-11 medium for two weeks at room temperature in flasks with
vented-caps under a 12 h photoperiod26. The spent medium was then filter-sterilized by passage through a 0.2 µm pore diameter filter and used as a close-to-natural source of diverse C
compounds27 for the communityt. At the end of each prescribed wet period, the soil solution was actively suctioned under mild vacuum (−0.22 bar) for one hour, then kept dry for 11 h. Soil
moisture dropped below 5% water content, within 4.3 h, which is not an unusually fast desiccation speed compared to those experienced in crusts during summer conditions, remaining at levels
too low for microbial activity28,29 until the next wetting (Fig. S1). These regimes resulted in significant and sustained soil respiration at each wetting, but the soils never got anoxic,
even at depth (Fig. S1), as measured directly in situ using a O2-measuring microoptode with a 50 µm tip diameter, connected to a Fire-Sting O2 oxygen meter, both from Pyroscience Gmbh
(Germany). After the final drying cycle, dishes were stored wrapped in parafilm and covered in tin foil at 4 °C. Once all treatments were completed samples were promptly processed. DNA
EXTRACTION AND MOLECULAR ANALYSES Three 0.25 g samples of soil were taken from each plate to extract community DNA with Qiagen DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen Inc. Germantown, MD, USA) used
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations in the extracts were determined initially via Qubit (Qubit 3 Fluorometer Invitrogen by ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham,
Massachusetts, USA). Guided by these data, extracts were diluted for qPCR to quantify the content of 16S rRNA gene copies and amplified using universal primers 338F
(5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 518R (5′-ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3′)30. The PCR reaction was performed in triplicate alongside negative controls of molecular grade water using SYBR Green FastMix
ROX Quantabio (Beverly, Massachusetts, USA) under the following conditions: an initial denaturation phase (2 min at 98 °C), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and
annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, followed by the melting curve acquisition (increasing temperature from 55 to 95 °C at 0.5 °C s-1 speed)31. This qPCR produced a standard curve with an R2 of
0.998. The standard curve was then used to calculate the number of copies of the 16S rRNA gene per mg of soil. Additionally, 20 µL of the same extract as used for qPCR for each sample was
used for 16S rRNA gene sequencing with MiSeq sequencing (Illumina NGS) with the 515F/806R primers which target the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene32. DOC ADDITIONS, QUANTIFICATION AND
BALANCES 15 mL of the spent _Microcoleus_ medium were initially added per wetting event to all treatments to achieve soil saturation. This corresponds to a rain event of 2.3 mm (15 mL over a
surface 64 cm2 surface), which is within the low end of rain event size at the site of origin (Fig. S2). To maintain soil hydration throughout the full duration of the wetting pulse, an
additional 3 mL was added every five hours thereafter to bring the soil to saturation. The soil was wet to saturation as dryland soils are commonly saturated and experience runoff following
rainfall. Total DOC added per pulse was computed from total wetting volume and the DOC concentrations of the spent medium (39 mg L-1), and was set to match natural steady state levels of
biocrust in the soil solution33,34,35, the totals added varying between 0.9 and 3.0 mg per plate, so as to balance consumption in longer incubations. Net DOC accumulation in the soil after
incubation was determined by subtraction of the DOC content of untreated control soils (0.93 mg per plate or 0.02 mg/g) from the end-point DOC content in each plate. The additions thus
maintained the DOC concentrations well within the very low DOC (oligotrophic realm) natural for these soils. Dissolved organic carbon extraction from soils was performed on 20 g (50%) of
each plate, following ref. 36. All DOC determinations were processed by Arizona State University Metals Environmental and Terrestrial Analytical Laboratory for total carbon and dissolved
organic carbon (DOC) quantification by an elemental analyzer. BIOINFORMATIC ANALYSES 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained were demultiplexed and quality controlled using the DADA2 plugin of
Qiime2 2022.8 refs. 37,38. Raw sequences were then trimmed for quality control, which created a feature table of unique sequences (amplicon sequence variants, ASV) along with their frequency
of occurrence. Singletons were disregarded from this table. The sample with the least reads had 11939, and that with the most had 28484 (Fig. S3). To ensure equal sampling effort, all
samples were trimmed randomly to include a sampling depth of 11939. Alpha rarefaction analysis showed that this was sufficient to reach saturation of diversity assessment in all samples
(Fig. S3). ASV were initially automatically classified using Greengenes 13.8 ref. 39. and any Archaeal reads discarded, but more detailed taxonomic assignments were carried out through BLAST
for any ASV of interest, given the low resolution and high level of errors in this database40. BLAST assignments were conducted using the 16S gene sequence and the strain with the highest
percent identity was selected with all of the sequences which underwent BLAST having 100% similarity with a sequence in the NCBI database. Disagreements between the Qiime2, Greengenes 13.8
assignment and BLAST were handled by selecting the taxonomic classification from BLAST as Greengenes has been demonstrated to have a high error rate41. When a specific strain could not be
selected as multiple different sequences shared 100% similarity it is noted using a “/”. Qiime2 2022.8 was used for all diversity metrics including Shannon’s Diversity, Chao1, Weighted
UniFrac, Unweighted UniFrac, Jaccard’s index, and Bray-Curtis index. Beta-diversity was assessed using principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) in Qiime2. From Qiime2, coordinates were
extracted and plotted in R so that 95% confidence ellipses could be calculated with the R vegan package42. Differential abundance analyses were also done in R using Hellinger to normalize
the feature table created above. ASVs which were differentially abundant between the 5-h and 60-h pulse regimes were determined using the DeSeq2 method43 in the R BiocManager package.
DETERMINATION OF NIMBLE RESPONDER (NIR) VS. TORPID RESPONDER (TOR) CHARACTER Linear regressions of log base 2 abundance as a function of treatment duration (excluding controls) were
conducted in R on data from any ASVs detected in at least six different samples. This culled ASVs to 370 out of an original 1639 detected. The slopes of such regressions are a proxy for the
NIR vs. TOR character of an ASV, where NIRs would show consistently increasing abundance with shorter pulse and vice-versa. To do this properly absolute counts are needed, but absolute
counts are lost on sequencing because of the intervening PCR reaction. To restore an absolute measure of abundance, we multiplied each ASV’s relative abundance by the total number of 16S
rRNA gene copy counts per unit weight of soil determined by qPCR on aliquots of the same extract that was sequenced.44. Because this is an indirect measure, we refer to it as Restored
Absolute Abundance (REA). A log2 transformation of REA values was then conducted to yield units that reflect apparent number of doublings. To assess the statistical significance of
regressions, we adjusted p values using the Benjamini-Hochberg correction to account for the multiplicity of statistical analyses conducted. STATISTICS AND REPRODUCIBILITY All statistical
analyses were performed in R statistical software version 4.1.2 (2021-11-01) refs. 42,45,46,47,48. Levene’s Test was used to test for equal variance and Shapiro-Wilk Test for normality.
After verifying that assumptions were met, the data was analyzed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Tukey’s honest significant difference was used as a post-hoc test for pairwise comparisons.
The experimental design was based on the detection of trends in measured or derives parameters (reponse variables) as a function of increased severity of treatments, and as such it contains
an inherent measure of reproducibility with an n of 5 against controls. REPORTING SUMMARY Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked
to this article. RESULTS PULSE REGIME EFFECTS ON MICROBIOME DIVERSITY We gauged microbial community diversity in the soil under different pulse regimes using both Chao1 and Shannon
diversity indices applied to the 16S rRNA gene data (compositional) at the maximal phylogenetic resolution possible (ASVs level; Fig. 2; detailed counts can be found in Supplementary Data
1). Data binned by treatment had equal variances for both indices, and data for both indices were normally distributed according to, respectively, Levene’s and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Therefore,
ANOVA was an appropriate statistical test. It showed significant differences with treatment for both Chao1 Richness (df = 12, _F_ = 4.2, _p_ = 0.019) and Shannon Diversity (df = 12, _F_ =
25.0, _p_ = 6 × 10−6). We found a depression of community diversity with decreasing pulse duration, the 5 h treatment being only half as rich as the control in the case of Chao1 and with a
similar decline when considering Shannon Diversity. These declining trends in diversity and richness with shorter pulse duration were not only significant but fit a logarithmic (saturating)
function of PD best (R2 = 0.35 with _p_ = 0.02 for Chao1 and R2 = 0.75 with _p_ = 3 × 10−5 for Shannon; Fig. S4), apparent Chao richness and Shannon diversity loses thus intensifying in the
short pulse range. PULSE REGIME EFFECTS ON COMMUNITY COMPOSITION The treatments caused clear shifts in microbial community composition, while replicates within treatments remained rather
self-similar. This we could demonstrate quantitatively using a PCoA ordination based on Weighted UniFrac distances (Fig. 3), which measures community similarity based on both relative
abundance of its members and their phylogenetic distance49. This analysis explained 88% of the variability in a two-axis space. Communities became increasingly more differentiated from the
starting (Control) community the shorter the pulsed duration imposed. PCoAs based on other similarity algorithms are shown in Fig. S5. Bray-Curtis similarity, which separates community by
relative abundance only50, yielded very similar results to those shown in Fig. 3, albeit with a somewhat reduced explanatory power (64% of variability). However, algorithms based on
presence/absence only, with (Unweighted UniFrac) or without phylogenetic distance (Jaccard’s Index)51, did not provide good separation. This all implies that differences in relative
abundance of particular ASVs, rather than the appearance or disappearance of phylotypes drove the diversification in community composition. ASVs responding consistently to treatments
apparently had some level of phylogenetic relatedness, judging from the slightly better separation capacity of Weighted UniFrac over Bray-Curtiss algorithms, although this phylogenetic
signal was not very strong. PULSE REGIME EFFECTS ON GROWTH EFFICIENCY We define the overall size of the microbiome as simply the absolute content of 16S rRNA gene copies in it, and
microbiome growth or decline as the change in this parameter. We could detect significant net growth of overall bacterial populations (microbiome) defined in this way under different regimes
with respect to the concentration found in the untreated soil (Fig. 4). These data had equal variances and were normally distributed. Therefore, an ANOVA was an appropriate statistical
test; it showed differences with treatment to be significant (df = 48, _F_ = 7.3, _p_ = 4 × 10−5). The increases ranged in magnitude from 12% to 45% and were significant in all but the 60-h
treatment, according to post-hoc Tukey Honest Significant Difference tests. In fact, there was a trend of decrease in growth with PD, significant by regression analysis (Fig. 4 and S4). Even
in the most active treatment, microbiome growth was meager. The microbiome grew much less than a doubling, which corresponds to generation times much longer than those typical for
environmental bacteria52 and suggests a potential limitation to growth. As shown in the balance sheets of Table 1, the DOC provided was almost completely consumed by resident bacteria at
each pulse in all treatments, and the oxygen dynamics in the soil showed a slowing of respiration rates soon after additions of DOC (Fig. S1), both confirming the notion of a C limitation.
In fact, the net microbiome size increases paralleled the total DOC consumed (R2 = 0.62 with _n_ = 5). Interestingly, however, the growth efficiency (microbiome growth per unit DOC used; in
blue in Fig. 4, calculations in Table 1) increased with PD until 20 h, to then suffer a moderate decrease again at 60 h. It could be suggested that the growth efficiency decrease with long
water-saturated incubations could be due to anoxia (and fermentation) setting in, but direct measurements show that this was not the case (Fig. S1). PULSE REGIME EFFECTS ON INDIVIDUAL
PHYLOTYPES We obtained absolute abundance of individual ASVs, as opposed of relative abundances used for alpha and beta diversity determinations above, by combining relative ASV abundances
from high-throughput sequencing with a determination of total 16S rRNA gene copy counts per g of soil for each treatment and replicate, as customarily done in similar systems26,53. A
graphical depiction of these data, simplified to showcase just the 15 most common ASVs, is in Fig. 5. The complete set is found in Supplementary Data 1. The fraction of all 16S rRNA gene
counts assignable to the most common 15 ASVs increased with shorter pulses, consistent with the decreased diversity we saw in short-pulse treatments (Fig. 4). When comparing the trend of
absolute abundances as a function of pulse duration in these most common bacterial ASVs, differential fates (growth vs. demise) of specific bacteria become apparent: some fared better under
shorter pulses, while some apparently preferred longer pulses. In order to quantify these responses, we carried out regression analyses of ASV-specific counts (log base 2) as a function of
pulse duration. An example of an ASV that did significantly better with shorter pulses is ASV 30970ef (assignable to the genus _Cnuella_) as shown in Fig. 6 (_p_ < 0.05, R² = 0.95, df =
10, _F_ = 179), while an ASV assignable to the genus _Bacillus_ (ASV 97fd540) had a clear preference for longer pulses (_p_ < 0.05, R² = 0.74, df = 12, _F_ = 34) (Fig. 6). _Cnuella_’s
response is what would be expected of a NIR organism in the theoretical framework of Garcia-Pichel and Sala (2022) [ref 23.], competing more successfully for resources under shorter pulses
than under longer pulses. The _Bacillus_ ASV, on the other hand, did better with longer pulses, which would be typical for TOR-like organisms. We could conduct this kind of systematic
analysis on a total of 370 different ASVs. Of those, more than 20% presented either a highly significant (_p_ < 0.05; corrected for multiple comparisons) or a significant (0.05 < _p_
< 0.1) correlation. The remaining 296 were not significantly responsive to PD length (_p_ > 0.1). Of the ASVs with significant regressions, some 60% tended to be TOR-like organisms
(i.e., doing better under long pulses, with a positive slope), and 40% showed a NIR-like response (negative slope). NIRs tended to display higher absolute values of the regression slope than
TORs, in essence responding more decidedly to variations in PD. WHO IS A NIR AND WHO IS A TOR? Individual ASV’s with marked NIR or TOR character are placed on a quantitative scale in Fig.
7, based on the slopes of the regression attained. A complete list of ASVs with their taxonomic assignment and their associated regression statistics is in Supplementary Data 3. Even a
cursory look at this table or Fig. 7 will show that there is no clear phylogenetic (taxonomic) group of bacteria specialized as either NIR or TOR. For example, ASV’s in the genera _Cnuella_,
_Agrobacterium_ or _Paracoccus_, belonging to separate Phyla, are among the most clearly NIR phylotypes, and have apparently attained this character convergently. This notion is also
supported by analysis of key drivers in community difference between the 5 h and 60 h pulse regimes shown using DESeq differential abundance analysis which demonstrated that 66 ASVs were
differentially abundant between the 5 h and 60 h pulses (_p_ < 0.05) (Fig. S6). And yet, the phylogenetic distribution of PD preference was not random either. All five _Deinococci_ ASVs
detected are on the NIR side with negative slopes, and many NIR-like organisms gather conspicuously around the families _Cytophagaceae_ and _Chitinophagaceae_ (both in the Phylum
_Bacteroidetes_), and around the _Oxalobacterales_ (_Betaproteobacteria_) and _Rhodobacterales_ (_Alphaproteobacteria_). One should caution, however, that all or part of the apparent
diversity in some of these closely related ASVs could potentially stem from sequence variability among homologs when strains contain more than one copy of the 16S rRNA gene in their genome.
Strongly leaning to the TOR side of the slide we consistently find ASVs in the classes _Chloracidobacteria_, “Acidobacteria-6” and _Solibacteres_ (all three in the Phylum _Acidobacteria_),
in the Actinobacteria (Classes _Actinobacteria_ and _Rubrobacteria_), as well as many in the order _Bacillales_ (_Firmicutes_). It may be worth noting that the list only applies to
heterotrophs, which was the target of our experimental design. Chemolithotrophs and photoautotrophs were not considered, even when they can be important members of the biocrust community15
and should principally also respond to the constraints of the PRP. DISCUSSION Our work indicates that shortening the duration of activity pulses will decrease bacterial diversity, both in
terms of richness and diversity. This is consistent with the progressive decreases in diversity measured in less controlled, but perhaps more natural, settings, where the frequency of
desiccation varies naturally across spatial gradients54 or was experimentally altered55. The implication that a progressively smaller number of bacterial species can cope with a more
intensely pulsed growth regime seems thus to be generalizable. Mechanistically, an explanation for such an effect can be sought in the expanded PRP: the increasing physiological burden
imposed by frequent transitioning between cellular quiescence and growth states depresses the net potential biomass gain a microbe can inch from a pulse, as a larger proportion of resources
and energy must be allocated to transition-powering reserves. Additionally, of course, direct cellular damage and stress caused by frequent desiccation9,56 may also contribute to this
effect. Few specialists will thus cope. The decreases in growth efficiency measured (Fig. 4) with shortening pulses below 20 h are consistent with this notion. In this regard, pulsed
environments of short PD should be considered extreme, in the same way that progressively fewer species characterize environments more extreme in mean values of environmental parameters like
temperature, salinity, etc.57. That the untreated control would display the greatest diversity of any sample is also consistent with ecological expectations. It should have been exposed to
pulses of varying duration in the natural environment during its recent past, thus allowing for an array of physiological types along the NIR/TOR continuum to time-share opportunities for
resource acquisition, resulting in a more diverse assemblage, consistent with the notion that environmental variability generally furthers microbial diversity3,58. Interestingly, in the US
Southwest, climate change models predict a decrease in the PD of summer rainfall59, a trend that is in fact already measurable60. Under this climate-change scenario, and judging from our
results here, the source soils for our experiments will (and should already) experience loses in microbial biodiversity and functional versatility. Beyond topsoil microbiomes, microbial
communities where adaptations to extreme pulsing can be expected to play significant roles include rain-driven subaerial biofilms, intertidal microbial mats, or intertidal endolithic
communities, and the aerobiome as it transitions between dry aerosol and hydrated cloud/fog states. Recurrent desiccation and rehydration pulses are characteristics of all of them. Our
analyses found clear evidence for the physiological diversification of bacteria in dryland soils along a gradient of preference for either short or long PD (NIR vs. TOR), as postulated in
the expanded pulse-reserve paradigm (EPRP) of Garcia-Pichel and Sala (2022) [ref. 23]. The intensity of the community responses detected in our experiment, which was rather short in total
duration, is somewhat surprising and speaks for the strength of PD as an ecological driver. That we could detect significant, consistent responses to PD involving 1 in 5 ASVs for which
enough data could be gathered, likely implies that many more ASV could have been detected had the treatments lasted longer, involved larger changes in total microbiome size, or if simply we
had used deeper sequencing. The growth preferences for PD we detected fell roughly on either side of the NIR/TOR continuum middle point defined by our experimental PD range. On the basis of
typical bacterial doubling times, it was predicted23 that NIR-like microorganism would become prominent during pulses shorter than 24 h while TOR-like organisms would prefer pulses longer
than a day. The PD range used in our experiment was designed to reflect inclusively conditions experienced during Summer Monsoon-type rains, in which topsoil may remain wet for hours only,
to the duration of typical winter rain events where the topsoil may remain wet for a few days. This implies that the divergence in physiology we found should result in tangible advantages or
disadvantages under current natural rainfall pulse regimes. Because a Summer monsoon season in warm deserts may only provide total wet times in the order of our experiment’s duration, it
also allows us to predict that rain PD should also be a driver of seasonal population dynamics in the soil microbiome through the NIR/TOR character, in addition to temperature (i.e., refs.
61,62), because of the PD differential associated with summer vs. winter rain events. Unfortunately, the absence of seasonal population dynamics data remains currently one of the most
conspicuous knowledge gaps in biocrust research15. The phylogenetic distribution of the NIRs and TORs we could detect constituted an interesting aspect of our findings: while neither NIR nor
TOR character was exclusive to one or a few taxonomic/phylogenetic clades, evidence from both the optimal explanatory power of ordination approaches that include phylogenetic distance (Fig.
3 vs. Fig. S5), and the recurrent appearance of certain taxa in the lists of NIRs and TORs speak for a moderate degree of heritability. Based on the types of physiological adaptations to
desiccation (for example, formation of spores with long periods of germination) some taxa were predicted to fit the TOR pattern: Actinobacteria and Firmicutes23. Desiccation-induced
spores63,64 represent an extreme case of all-out late-pulse allocation to reserves that enables extremely long quiescence periods but requires a relatively long pulse (days) with copious
resources to enable a complex process of germination64,65, as demonstrated in the _Bacillus_ blooms elicited during long wetting pulses in biocrusts66. Other complex patterns of response to
(a single) wetting pulse67 could potentially provide some additional guidance. Our survey at least partly confirmed this prediction, although the experimental patterns we found were far from
absolute, containing many an exception. In our attempt to compare theory and experimental evidence, a limitation must be highlighted: the NIR/TOR theory is based on the differential
physiology of organisms in isolation, whereas the experiments carried out here measured responses of microbial communities and their members based not only on their differential physiology,
but also on how it plays out in the presence of other members and any ensuing interactions. For example, the theory predicts that, in isolation, both NIRs and TORs will do better with long
than in short pulses. It is only under competition for resources (i.e., space, carbon, nutrients) that NIRs will lose ground with longer pulses, at which they are less efficient. Thus, our
interpretation that NIR’s populations will decline with longer pulses inherently necessitates that competition be at play, and this is why our experiments were designed to maintain C
limitation. By contrast, the NIR/TOR model predicts that TORs will inherently do worse with short pulses because they have longer minimal PD for viability. Perhaps this discrepancy is behind
the finding that the typical TORs sensitivity for pulse size (i.e., the absolute slopes in Fig. 7) was more moderate than that of NIRs. The other predictive limitation of consequence is
that the theory includes mechanistic explanations about nimble or torpid responses on the basis of differential management of storage compounds. But our experiment offers no mechanistic
information in this regard. Of course, microbes do commonly produce organic and inorganic storage reserves, typically in the form of polymers68, the genetic ability to produce abundant
reserves correlating in specific microbes with resistance to stress conditions69, and demonstrably supporting resuscitation from dormancy70. But the databases currently do not allow us to
connect directly phylogenetic assignments with reserve physiology for a full trait-based analysis, other than perhaps pointing to the coincidence between spore formation capacity and TOR
character discussed above. This will have to await more directed research efforts. The theoretical expectation for any given microbe was that as more carbon is allocated to powering
transitions to quiescence and resuscitation with decreasing PD, less of it would be available for net growth, so that, all other things being equal, growth rates should decrease with PD. And
yet we found that net growth of the microbiome was significantly more pronounced with decreasing PD (Fig. 4), which can be apparently paradoxical. However, in our experiments, DOC
availability was clearly limiting growth, as practically all DOC provided was consumed in all treatments (Table 1), and respiration never quite consumed all available oxygen (Fig. S1).
Because of this, net microbiome growth followed roughly DOC availability, which was unequal among treatments. However, the calculated values of growth efficiency were more in line with
theoretical predictions, generally decreasing with shortening PD (Fig. 4), with the notable exception of the 60-h treatment, which had only moderate growth efficiency. Potentially, this long
treatment may have suffered from a depression in respiratory efficiency because of more generalized microoxic conditions in the soil, and a lesser availability of high-quality, readily
metabolizable DOC (Fig. S1). In any event, the functional properties of the soil microbiome are dependent on PD in a manner consistent with theoretical expectation for pulses around or below
a day’s length. The recently advanced “expanded pulse reserve paradigm” offers a theoretical framework to understand and predict microbiomes in arid lands on the basis of activity pulse
regimes driven by water availability, but its predictions had not been subject to direct experimental testing. Here, we provide evidence for some of the paradigm’s main phenomenological
predictions, including the existence of specialist microbial types along the NIR-TOR continuum, and the direct relationships between microbial diversity and growth efficiency as a function
of pulse duration. No attempts were made to test the central mechanistic prediction of the EPRP that the phenomena observed are based on the adaptive diversification of physiological
management of reserves. This missing assignment will likely require more sophisticated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses targeting reserve polymer genes on natural assemblages, or
more traditional physiological studies on new TOR and NIR-like isolates. Such isolates have not been obtained either. DATA AVAILABILITY All data supporting the findings of this study are
available either within the paper or its Supplementary Information. The source data behind the graphs in Figs. 2 and 4 can be found in Supplementary Data 4 and 5 respectively. The sequences
used have been deposited into NCBI database with BioProject accession number: PRJNA996965. REFERENCES * Loik, M. E., Breshears, D. D., Lauenroth, W. K. & Belnap, J. A multi-scale
perspective of water pulses in dryland ecosystems: climatology and ecohydrology of the western USA. _Oecologia_ 141, 269–281 (2004). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Howard, R. J. &
Mendelssohn, I. A. Structure and composition of oligohaline marsh plant communities exposed to salinity pulses. _Aquat. Bot._ 68, 143–164 (2000). Article Google Scholar * Nguyen, J.,
Lara-Gutiérrez, J. & Stocker, R. Environmental fluctuations and their effects on microbial communities, populations and individuals. _FEMS Microbiol. Rev._ 45, 1–16 (2021). Article
Google Scholar * Reinle, K., Mogk, A. & Bukau, B. The diverse functions of small heat shock proteins in the proteostasis network: functions and mechanisms of sHsps. _J. Mol. Biol._ 434,
167157 (2022). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Overmann, J. & Garcia-Pichel, F. The phototrophic way of life. _prokaryotes_ 2, 32 (2006). Article Google Scholar * Gutt, J. et
al. Antarctic ecosystems in transition – life between stresses and opportunities. _Biol. Rev._ 96, 798–821 (2021). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Collins, S. L. et al. A multiscale,
hierarchical model of pulse dynamics in arid-land ecosystems. _Annu, Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst._ 45, 397–419 (2014). Article Google Scholar * Salema, M. P., Parker, C. A., Kidby, D. K.,
Chatel, D. L. & Armitage, T. M. Rupture of nodule bacteria on drying and rehydration. _Soil Biol. Biochem,_ 14, 15–22 (1982). Article Google Scholar * Potts, M. Mechanisms of
desiccation tolerance in cyanobacteria. _Eur. J. Phycol._ 34, 319–328 (1999). Article Google Scholar * Stetter, K. O. Extremophiles and their adaptation to hot environments. _FEBS Lett._
452, 22–25 (1999). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Rampelotto, P. H. Extremophiles and extreme environments. _Life_ 3, 482–485 (2013). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
* Pikuta, E. V., Hoover, R. B. & Tang, J. Microbial extremophiles at the limits of life. _Crit. Rev. Microbiol._ 33, 183–209 (2007). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * M. C.
Fernandes, V., Rudgers, J. A., Collins, S. L. & Garcia-Pichel, F. Rainfall pulse regime drives biomass and community composition in biological soil crusts. _Ecology_ 103, 1–13 (2022).
Article Google Scholar * Reed, S. C. et al. Changes to dryland rainfall result in rapid moss mortality and altered soil fertility. _Nat. Clim. Chang_ 2, 752–755 (2012). Article CAS
Google Scholar * Garcia-Pichel, F. The microbiology of biological soil crusts. _Annu. Rev. Microbiol_ 77, 149–171 (2023). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Liang, C., Das, K. C. &
McClendon, R. W. The influence of temperature and moisture contents regimes on the aerobic microbial activity of a biosolids composting blend. _Bioresour. Technol._ 86, 131–137 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Rittershaus, E. S. C., Baek, S. H. & Sassetti, C. M. The normalcy of dormancy: common themes in microbial quiescence. _Cell Host Microbe_ 13,
643–651 (2013). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Schimel, J. P. Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. _Annu. Rev. Ecol.
Evol. Syst._ 12, 409–432 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Gremer, J. R. & Sala, A. It is risky out there: the costs of emergence and the benefits of prolonged dormancy. _Oecologia_
172, 937–947 (2013). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Bär, M., Von Hardenberg, J., Meron, E. & Provenzale, A. Modelling the survival of bacteria in drylands: the advantage of being
dormant. _Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci._ 269, 937–942 (2002). Article Google Scholar * Reynolds, J. F., Kemp, P. R., Ogle, K. & Fernández, R. J. Modifying the ‘pulse-reserve’ paradigm
for deserts of North America: precipitation pulses, soil water, and plant responses. _Oecologia_ 141, 194–210 (2004). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Noy-Meir, I. Desert ecosystems:
environment and producers. _Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst._ 4, 25–52 (1973). * Garcia-Pichel, F. & Sala, O. Expanding the pulse-reserve paradigm to microorganisms on the basis of
differential reserve management strategies. _Bioscience_ 72, 638–650 (2022). Article Google Scholar * Garcia-Pichel, F. Desert environments: biological soil crusts. _Encycl. Environ.
Microbiol._ https://doi.org/10.1002/0471263397.env166 (2003). * Giraldo‐Silva, A., Nelson, C., Barger, N. N. & Garcia‐Pichel, F. Nursing biocrusts: isolation, cultivation, and fitness
test of indigenous cyanobacteria. _Restor. Ecol._ 27, 793–803 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Bethany, J., Johnson, S. L. & Garcia-Pichel, F. High impact of bacterial predation on
cyanobacteria in soil biocrusts. _Nat. Commun._ 13, 4835 (2022). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Baran, R. et al. Functional genomics of novel secondary metabolites
from diverse cyanobacteria using untargeted metabolomics. _Mar. Drugs_ 11, 3617–3631 (2013). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Troller J. A. _Water Activity and Food_
(Elsevier, 2012). * Zeidler, S. & Müller, V. Coping with low water activities and osmotic stress in Acinetobacter baumannii: significance, current status and perspectives. _Environ.
Microbiol._ 21, 2212–2230 (2019). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Orschler, L., Agrawal, S. & Lackner, S. On resolving ambiguities in microbial community analysis of partial
nitritation anammox reactors. _Sci. Rep._ 9, 1–10 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Couradeau, E. et al. Bacteria increase arid-land soil surface temperature through the production of
sunscreens. _Nat. Commun._ 7, 1–7 (2016). Article Google Scholar * Nelson, C. & Garcia-Pichel, F. Beneficial cyanosphere heterotrophs accelerate establishment of cyanobacterial
biocrust. _Appl. Environ. Microbiol._ 87, e01236–21 (2021). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Bethany, J., Johnson, S. L. & Garcia-Pichel, F. “High impact of
bacterial predation on cyanobacteria in soil biocrusts.”. _Nat. Commun._ 13, 4835 (2022). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Tucker, C., Ferrenberg, S. & Reed, S. C.
Modest residual effects of short-term warming, altered hydration, and biocrust successional state on dryland soil heterotrophic carbon and nitrogen cycling. _Front. Ecol. Evol._ 8, 467157
(2020). Article Google Scholar * Young, K. E. et al. Vertical movement of soluble carbon and nutrients from biocrusts to subsurface mineral soils. _Geoderma_ 405, 115495 (2022). Article
CAS Google Scholar * Robertson, G. P., Coleman, D. C., Bledsoe, C. S. & Sollins, P. (eds). _Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research_ (Oxford University Press, New York,
1999). * Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. _Nat. Methods_ 7, 335–336 (2010). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar *
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 37, 852–857 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central
Google Scholar * DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. _Appl. Environ. Microbiol._ 72, 5069–5072 (2006). Article
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Ángeles Muñoz-Martín, M. et al. Cyanobacterial biocrust diversity in Mediterranean ecosystems along a latitudinal and climatic gradient. _N.
Phytol_. 221, 123–141 (2018). * Odom, A. R. et al. Metagenomic profiling pipelines improve taxonomic classification for 16S amplicon sequencing data. _Sci. Rep._ 13, 13957 (2023). Article
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: community ecology package. _R. Package Version_ 2, 6–4 (2022). Google Scholar * Anders, S. & Huber, W.
Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. _Genome Biol._ 11, R106 (2010). * Gonzalez-de-Salceda, L. & Garcia-Pichel, F. The allometry of cellular DNA and ribosomal gene
content among microbes and its use for the assessment of microbiome community structure. _Microbiome_ 9, 1–8 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. _An {R} Companion
to Applied Regression_ 3rd edn (Sage, 2018). * Fox, J., Weisberg, S. & Price, B. _carData: Companion to Applied Regression Data Sets_ (Sage, 2020). * Pruim, R., Kaplan, D. T. &
Horton, N. J. The mosaic Package: helping students to ‘Think with Data’ Using R. _R. J._ 9, 77–102 (2017). Article Google Scholar * R Core Team. _R: A Language and Environment for
Statistical Computing_ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). * Lozupone, C. A., Hamady, M., Kelley, S. T. & Knight, R. Quantitative and qualitative β diversity measures lead to
different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. _Appl. Environ. Microbiol._ 73, 1576–1585 (2007). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Bray, J. R.
& Curtis, J. T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. _Ecol. Soc. Am._ 27, 325–349 (1957). Google Scholar * Jaccard, P. Nouvelles recherches sur la
distribution florale. _Bull. de. la Soc. Vaud. des. Sci. Natur._ 44, 223–270 (1908). Google Scholar * Weissman, J. L., Hou, S. & Fuhrman, J. A. Estimating maximal microbial growth rates
from cultures, metagenomes, and single cells via codon usage patterns. _Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 118, 1–10 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Heredia-Velásquez, A. M. et al. Dual use of
solar power plants as biocrust nurseries for large-scale arid soil restoration. _Nat. Sustain._ 6, 955–964 (2023). * Rothrock, M. J. & Garcia-Pichel, F. Microbial diversity of benthic
mats along a tidal desiccation gradient. _Environ. Microbiol._ 7, 593–601 (2005). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Fernandes, V. M. C. et al. Exposure to predicted precipitation
patterns decreases population size and alters community structure of cyanobacteria in biological soil crusts from the Chihuahuan Desert. _Environ. Microbiol._ 20, 259–269 (2018). Article
PubMed Google Scholar * Dawes, E. A. & Senior, P. J. The role and regulation of energy reserve polymers in micro-organisms. _Adv. Microb. Physiol._ 10, 135–266 (1973). Article CAS
PubMed Google Scholar * Sharp, C. E. et al. Humboldt’s spa: Microbial diversity is controlled by temperature in geothermal environments. _ISME J._ 8, 1166–1174 (2014). Article CAS PubMed
PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kuang, J. L. et al. Contemporary environmental variation determines microbial diversity patterns in acid mine drainage. _ISME J._ 7, 1038–1050 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Cook, B. I. & Seager, R. The response of the North American monsoon to increased greenhouse gas forcing. _J. Geophys. Res. Atmosm._ 118, 1690–1699
(2013). Article Google Scholar * Petrie, M. D., Collins, S. L., Gutzler, D. S. & Moore, D. M. Regional trends and local variability in monsoon precipitation in the northern Chihuahuan
Desert, USA. _J. Arid Environ._ 103, 63–70 (2014). Article Google Scholar * Garcia-Pichel, F., Loza, V., Marusenko, Y., Mateo, P. & Potrafka, R. M. Temperature drives the
continental-scale distribution of key microbes in topsoil communities. _Science_ 340, 1574–1577 (2013). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Giraldo-Silva, A., Fernandes, V. M. C.,
Bethany, J. & Garcia-Pichel, F. Niche partitioning with temperature among heterocystous cyanobacteria (Scytonema spp., Nostoc spp., and Tolypothrix spp.) from biological soil crusts.
_Microorganisms_ 8, 396 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Setlow, P. I will survive: DNA protection in bacterial spores. _Trends Microbiol._ 15, 172–180 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Stewart, G. S., Johnstone, K., Hagelberg, E. & Ellar, D. J. Commitment of bacterial spores to germinate. A measure of the trigger reaction.
_Biochem J._ 198, 101–106 (1981). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Dworkin, J. & Shah, I. M. Exit from dormancy in microbial organisms. _Nat. Rev. Microbiol._ 8,
890–896 (2010). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Karaoz, U. et al. Large blooms of Bacillales (Firmicutes) underlie the response to wetting of cyanobacterial biocrusts at various
stages of maturity. _mBio_ 9, e01366–16 (2018). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Trexler, R. V. et al. BONCAT-FACS-Seq reveals the active fraction of a biocrust
community undergoing a wet-up event. _Front. Microbiol._ 14, 1176751 (2023). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Mason-Jones, K., Robinson, S. L., Veen, G. F. C., Manzoni, S.
& van der Putten, W. H. Microbial storage and its implications for soil ecology. _ISME J._ 16, 617–629 (2022). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Madueño, L., Coppotelli, B. M., Festa,
S., Alvarez, H. M. & Morelli, I. S. Insights into the mechanisms of desiccation resistance of the Patagonian PAH-degrading strain Sphingobium sp. 22B. _J. Appl. Microbiol._ 124,
1532–1543 (2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Klotz, A. et al. Awakening of a dormant cyanobacterium from nitrogen chlorosis reveals a genetically determined program. _Curr. Biol._
26, 2862–2872 (2016). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was supported by a grant (DEB 2129537) from the National Science Foundation to
F.G.P. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Patrick Kut &
Ferran Garcia-Pichel Authors * Patrick Kut View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ferran Garcia-Pichel View author publications You can also
search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS P.K. conducted all field sampling and experimentation. F.G.P. designed experiments. P.K. and F.G.P. conducted data analyses and
interpretation, prepared displays and wrote manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Ferran Garcia-Pichel. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing
interests. PEER REVIEW PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Communications Biology_ thanks anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: David
Favero. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL SUPPLEMENTARY FILES SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 1–5 REPORTING SUMMARY RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate
credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article
are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and
your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Kut, P., Garcia-Pichel, F. Nimble vs. torpid responders to hydration
pulse duration among soil microbes. _Commun Biol_ 7, 455 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06141-5 Download citation * Received: 19 September 2023 * Accepted: 03 April 2024 *
Published: 12 April 2024 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06141-5 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative