Professor Kristin Wustholz answers questions on her scientific career, scientific developments she is excited about and directions the spectroscopy and photochemistry communities should

focus on, as well as her experience of being an Editorial Board Member for _Communications Chemistry_. Kristin Wustholz obtained a B.A.S. in Chemistry and Philosophy from Muhlenberg College

(USA) in 2002. She obtained her M.S. (2005) and Ph.D. (2007) from the University of Washington in Seattle, funded in part by an NSF IGERT fellowship. Her research with Bart Kahr and Phil

Reid involved single-molecule spectroscopy of dyed salt crystals. As a postdoctoral fellow at Northwestern University, she studied plasmonics, localized surface plasmon resonance microscopy,

of chromophores in environments that are inherently complex for applications to solar energy conversion and art conservation. Recently, her group discovered blinking-based multiplexing

(BBM), a simple, versatile approach to multicolor super-resolved imaging without using spectrally distinct probes. WHY DID YOU CHOOSE TO BE A SCIENTIST? I have always been fascinated by

science, even as a child. But I didn’t see myself as a scientist until I met my high school chemistry teacher, Carol Guogas. Carol was an utterly fantastic teacher – challenging, fair, kind,

and motivating. She helped me see that my curiosity, academic accomplishments, and lab skills could readily translate into a scientific career. I distinctly remember the day we did flame

tests in lab. The moment I saw rocks glow in vibrant hues, I knew that I wanted to be scientist studying light and color. Fast forward to my time at Muhlenberg College, a small liberal arts

institution, where I had the opportunity of working closely with Profs. Marsha Baar and Bruce Anderson in the research lab setting. From these tremendous mentors I experienced both the

thrills and the frustrations of research in organic synthesis and photochemistry, finding ultimately, a deep joy in the process of figuring something out, sharing that knowledge with

colleagues, and advancing the field. Now, as a faculty member at William & Mary, I have the distinct privilege of working with bright, diverse, curious, and creative students. Mentoring

these students, supporting them as they find their voices, and helping them grow into skilled researchers and communicators is extremely fulfilling. In short, intellectual curiosity brought

me to science, but it’s the people (mentors, colleagues, students) that keep me here. WHAT SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT ARE YOU CURRENTLY MOST EXCITED ABOUT? Scientific advances that address the

global challenges of climate change and renewable energy are at the top of my list. I’m particularly excited about the growing synergy among computational chemistry, experimental chemistry,

and data science to harness the power of machine learning to discover and develop new molecules, materials, and processes for renewable fuels. In parallel with these and other exciting

scientific advances in catalysis and photochemistry, I’m thrilled by the ever-growing presence of diversity, inclusion, and equity work in the scientific community. As the people doing

science become increasingly diverse, the breadth and depth of scientific understanding and the advances that benefit society also grow. WHAT DIRECTION DO YOU THINK YOUR RESEARCH FIELD SHOULD

GO IN? As global population and the corresponding energy demand continues to surge, the urgent need for renewable energy requires creative solutions from the chemical community and

concerted effort as citizen scientists. I believe the spectroscopy and photochemistry communities should be laser focused – pun intended – on environmental issues, especially renewable

energy and climate change. I also believe that scientists should consider increased engagement in the public sector, helping to communicate science to a diverse array of audiences. WHAT

ATTRACTED YOU TO BECOMING AN EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBER FOR _COMMUNICATIONS CHEMISTRY_? One of the greatest things about being a chemist is the opportunity to engage with a vibrant scientific

community where ideas are generated, exchanged, and evaluated. I was attracted to becoming an Editorial Board Member at _Communications Chemistry_ because it had the potential to connect me

with a broader chemical community and challenge me to keep learning and evolving as a scientist. For me, meeting the editorial team of talented, engaged, and collaborative professionals

sealed the deal. WHAT HAVE YOU GOTTEN OUT OF THE EXPERIENCE OF BEING AN EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBER FOR _COMMUNICATIONS CHEMISTRY_? In addition to being more connected to the broader chemical

community and learning new areas of research beyond my sub-discipline, my work as an EBM has made me a better writer, evaluator, and teacher. For example, as an EBM I see how expressing the

“so what” of a study (not just the “what”) is such an important and undervalued skill. I’ve translated this first-hand experience into more effective mentorship of my students in both the

research and classroom settings. WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE ROLE OF _COMMUNICATIONS CHEMISTRY_ IN THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY? _Communications Chemistry_ is a venue for science without

sub-disciplinary boundaries. If you have a significant idea, advance, or insight to share with the chemical community and you think colleagues in a variety of sub-disciplines would find it

intriguing, then give CommsChem a try. From my perspective, _Communications Chemistry_ also goes beyond publishing great science – it also supports the people engaged in the scientific

endeavor though policies like open access publishing, transparent peer review, acknowledging reviewers’ work in reviewer of the month awards, and providing training grants for early career

researchers. I also find the close collaboration between professional editors and Editorial Board Members to be exceedingly robust and beneficial for authors, as it encourages different

perspectives on manuscript assessment and publishing decisions. _This interview was conducted by the editors of Communications Chemistry._ RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is

licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give

appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in

this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative

Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a

copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Q&A with Editorial Board Member Professor Kristin

Wustholz. _Commun Chem_ 5, 157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-022-00776-3 Download citation * Published: 22 November 2022 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-022-00776-3 SHARE THIS

ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative