Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s wish to continue using Sussex Royal for their brand and title of their foundation has been called into question. One of Queen Elizabeth’s advisers says

having “royal” in the title of their various endeavors, such as their website (SussexRoyal.com), would not be “satisfactory,” as they have stepped down from official royal duties. Thomas

Woodcock, Garter King of Arms, told _The Times_ on Tuesday, “One cannot be two things at once. You either are [royal] or you’re not.” A royal source tells PEOPLE that the Sussex Royal usage

question is “still being worked through” with officials at the palace. Woodcock emphasized that this was his opinion and that the final decision lies with the Queen. And he conceded there

royal duties. “Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved members of my family. I recognise the challenges they have experienced as a result of intense scrutiny over the last two

years and support their wish for a more independent life,” the monarch said. Woodcock is also believed to have been consulted by the palace about the correct form for addressing the couple.

On Monday, it emerged that officials were reviewing whether the couple could be referred to as Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Harry, Duke of Sussex. Such style follows the form normally

associated with divorced members of the royal family. _CAN’T GET ENOUGH OF _PEOPLE_‘S ROYALS COVERAGE? SIGN UP FOR OUR FREE ROYALS NEWSLETTER TO GET THE LATEST UPDATES ON KATE MIDDLETON,

MEGHAN MARKLE AND MORE!_ The last best-known examples of those were Harry’s mother, Diana as she was formally known as Diana, Princess of Wales. And his divorced aunt Sarah Ferguson, who is

known as Sarah, Duchess of York.