Play all audios:
In Scotland, even the ‘satirists’ are house-trained loyalists to the regime, so Janey Godley’s humour never had any cutting edge. Instead, she became a court favourite and, of course,
recipient of Scottish government engagements. This week’s revelation of her tweeting history suggested that a little time should have been spent by one of the innumerable special advisers on
due diligence before Ms Godley was promoted as the vernacular voice of the nation. Some of these tweets were so disgustingly racist, obscene and offensive, particularly towards disabled
people, that family newspapers did not reprint them. When the storm broke, the content could not be communicated to ministers because the Scottish government IT binned them. Read More Janey
Godley: Hurtful tweets were 'completely unacceptable' says Nicola Sturgeon... The absence of satire from Scottish broadcasting is one of its significant downsides. Can you imagine
the response if there was any equivalent to Have I Got News for You?, handing out the same indiscriminately brutal treatment to Scottish politicians as is accepted (because they have no
choice) by Westminster ones? But what of Ms Godley? Her penitence would have been more convincing if it had come before the tweets emerged rather than after. Sorry for being caught, more
like it. As for them being “historic”, 2016 scarcely matches that description, for a person who has had plenty time to know better. Here, however, is the test question. Would I prosecute her
under Humza Yousaf’s Hate Crimes Act? Of course not. Let her stew in her own ignominy – but it does go to show the judgements that will have to be made under that pernicious legislation. A
MESSAGE FROM THE EDITOR: THANK YOU FOR READING THIS ARTICLE. WE'RE MORE RELIANT ON YOUR SUPPORT THAN EVER AS THE SHIFT IN CONSUMER HABITS BROUGHT ABOUT BY CORONAVIRUS IMPACTS OUR
ADVERTISERS. IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY, PLEASE CONSIDER SUPPORTING OUR TRUSTED, FACT-CHECKED JOURNALISM BY TAKING OUT A DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION.