When the COVID-19 restrictions came into force more than two months ago, it meant lights out for the country’s 200,000 poker machines. Now, the pokies are slowly turning on again across the

country. This week, NSW became the first state to allow venues to reopen, with certain rules mandating patrons keep 1.5 metres apart. While the health risks certainly need to be considered,

there appears to be little to no thought being given to managing the risks of gambling harm that might come from restarting the machines after such an extensive break. The economic recession

and massive job losses make the situation even more worrisome. We know when people experience financial hardship, they are more likely to gamble. And at-risk gamblers, particularly, are

forms of gambling. We have limited evidence, so far, as to the actual uptake of other forms of gambling during the lockdown. However, a survey of gamblers conducted in the ACT last year

found that only 0.8% of gamblers engaged in offshore casino or pokie gambling. Research in NSW has also found that only 2.3% of 18- to 24-year-olds played internet casino games and just 0.8%

played online poker. These percentage decreased among older age brackets. One of the main reasons is that online casino and poker machine gambling is illegal in Australia.

------------------------- _ READ MORE: WITH POKIES SHUT DOWN, CORONAVIRUS STRESS COULD DRIVE MORE PEOPLE TO RECKLESS ONLINE GAMBLING _ ------------------------- So, for your average

Australian pokie player, the current closure of pokie venues is a compulsory break – a time when the constant “do I” or “don’t I” debate in people’s minds is temporarily suspended. There

will be many pokie players who will take this opportunity to turn their backs on the machines once and for all. WHAT IF ALCOHOL SALES HAD BEEN BANNED – AND THEN REINTRODUCED? Although

figures differ marginally across jurisdictions, approximately 10% of the adult population in Australia could be considered to be an at-risk or problem gambler. Further to this, one in three

people who play EGMs EXPAND AT FIRST REF are considered at-risk or problem gamblers gamblers. This is assessed consistently across states using the Problem Gambling Severity Index, which

asks questions such as, “have you felt you might have a problem with gambling?” and “has gambling caused financial problems for you or your household?” Pre-COVID-19 analysis conducted by the

ANU Centre for Gambling Research found that problem gamblers experience significantly worse social and economic outcomes than people without gambling problems – and these poorer outcomes

are long-term. ------------------------- _ READ MORE: NEW RESEARCH SHOWS POKIE OPERATORS ARE NOT NEARLY AS CHARITABLE AS THEY CLAIM _ ------------------------- On top of this, the isolation

and uncertainty caused by COVID-19 has triggered or exacerbated many mental health problems in our communities, particularly among at-risk gamblers. This is why the reopening of venue doors

is of such concern – it could result in the unleashing of months of pent-up angst for at-risk gamblers. Governments need to be thinking about harm reduction strategies now. If alcohol

purchases had been restricted during the lock-down period, for example, it would be reasonable to assume that harm-minimisation strategies would need to be put in place to manage the

reintroduction of alcohol. This is no different to the reintroduction of pokies. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MINIMISING HARM As a result of COVID-19 social distancing restrictions, there will likely

be requirements on venues to enforce social distancing (as in NSW) or limit the time patrons can spend on one machine or in the venue. Restricting session time on machines to a maximum of

one hour, for example, would help reduce gambling harm. We know from the 2019 ACT gambling survey that people who typically spend one hour or more in a single session are more likely to be

at-risk gamblers. Other suggestions to minimise gambling harm when restarting machines include: * public information campaigns detailing the risks associated with EGM play. This would assist

people to make informed choices about whether to play again and what that means for their lives * more counselling and financial services support to help people who have effectively

“self-excluded” from gambling during the shutdown to continue to do so. Research in ACT has found the vast majority of people (90%) who have gambled in the past 12 months wanted support to

cut back or stop * regulators need to be extra vigilant around inducements and advertising that will be used by venues to bring gamblers back. We need to ensure this isn’t predatory. This is

a golden opportunity for state and territory governments to provide support to clubs to diversify their business models and reduce the numbers of machines on their premises. It will also be

crucial to monitor the harm when the machines come back on. Most jurisdictions have recently conducted gambling prevalence surveys, and there should be a staged data collection process to

monitor any trends in behaviour. The gambling industry sector in all the other states and territories will likely lobby governments hard to reopen soon. And governments will likely be eager

to see the revenue stream of EGM taxation begin flowing again. However, without the implementation of substantial harm-minimisation strategies to manage the re-introduction of pokies in our

communities, we will likely see a significant increase in gambling harm in Australia.