Beijing’s grandiose military parade memorializing the 70th anniversary of World War II’s end has drawn global attention, generating a lot of discussion and comments from international media

and China watchers. Unfortunately much of the analysis and interpretations about the parade have been surprisingly sensationalized, superficial, and over-interpreted. There are multiple

reasons responsible for this over-interpretation. One example is that people often try to connect specific occasions or policy actions with current events. However, they have forgotten that

the decision to conduct such a large undertaking as the parade was made quite some time ago, so connections with current events may not exist. Many reports about the September 3 military

in early spring of this year. This was long before the Chinese stock market’s drop. When announcing the parade, the leadership in Beijing could not have foreseen the current stock market

woes, much less the devastating explosion in Tianjin earlier this month. So any argument that the leadership used the parade to distract from the current issues is baseless. Even though any

regime will have multiple purposes when conducting a major event, there will always be a main reason motivating them for doing so. The organizers will also have main target audience in mind

for such a display. People should try to avoid overlooking the main reason instead of focusing on the secondary objectives. The parade was conducted on the morning of September 3 for only

three hours; however, it was a general mobilization for the entire PLA. In fact, each branch of the military, the PLA, PLA Navy, PLA Air Force, and the Second Artillery Corps, all

participated in the parade. When people make comments on this parade, they should not forget about what has transpired within the PLA in recent years. Through Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption

campaign the PLA experienced its largest personnel change since the Cultural Revolution. Guo Boxiong and Xu Caihou, the two chief commanders of the PLA just three years ago, were both

indicted on corruption charges, and more than 50 PLA generals were removed from their positions under the party’s investigations. This is a huge shakeup of activity within the military power

structure, and it has had a huge impact on the PLA—both within its own ranks and in the eyes of the people. For China’s top leaders, the military parade served the important purposes of

reenergizing the PLA’s morale and helping to improve both its image with the people and solidarity within its ranks. Therefore, the parade itself was a major simulation and mobilization for

the PLA after its significant power restructuring. A very special aspect of the parade was the inclusion of 56 PLA generals actively participating in the parade themselves, marching with

their soldiers and taking part in all training exercises in the months leading up to the parade. This was the first time in the history of the PLA’s military parades that such an action was

taken, as generals from all branches of the military marched with the troops. It was a power exercise to reemphasize the Party’s absolute control of the PLA. Any interpretation suggesting

that the parade was used to mainly serve Beijing’s foreign policy, or to display power to China’s neighbors, overlooks the main reason the parade was held. Another reason for the

misinterpretation is that people often use their own culture and historic framework to understand another country. For a nation like the United States that does not hold military

processions, it is a little difficult to understand Beijing’s actions, so it’s tempting to assume that there must be some special meaning. Many of the comments about the parade have somehow

automatically assumed Beijing is just using the 70th anniversary of the war’s end for the purpose of propaganda. For many Americans, 70 years is so long ago and not relevant to current

politics. However in terms of historic memory, China’s memory is too long, where the United States’ memory is too short. It should also not be forgotten that WWII was a terrible and violent

war that took place in China’s homeland. During the war the Japanese occupied over 900 Chinese cities, and China suffered 14 years of foreign invasion and the brutality of war. It is true

that the government has used this part of history as a tool and resource for mobilization. Yet this is no doubt the darkest period of time in the history of China and many Chinese families

have sad stories about the war that pass through the generations. In fact, during recent weeks one of the most popular trends on Chinese social media has been people posting family stories

and photos about the war and their experiences. To simply consider the anniversary of the war as government propaganda is inaccurate. That is also the reason this parade was so

enthusiastically supported by many Chinese, and many were angry about the foreign reports and Western media accounts regarding the event. The military parade of September 3 mainly served

domestic purposes, though the international media inferred it was an extension of foreign policy. It may be that this was a public relations failure for Beijing, judging from the response it

elicited from the outside world, and there are important lessons that Beijing can learn from this. China is rising as major world power, so there is no doubt that any actions or remarks

from Beijing will closely be watched and interpreted. It is also natural that such a major event and eye-catching military procession would draw so much attention, but people outside China

should be aware that over-interpretation is irresponsible, risky, and even dangerous, as it often leads to misunderstanding and misjudgment. _Zheng Wang is currently a Carnegie Fellow at New

America. He is the Director of the Center for Peace and Conflict Studies and an Associate Professor in the School of Diplomacy and International Relations at Seton Hall University in New

Jersey. His book _Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations_ is the recipient of the International Studies Association’s the Yale H.

Ferguson Award._