A Bill that gives three aviation regulators statutory powers and enhances the fine for violations from ₹10 lakh to ₹1 crore in a bid to improve aircraft safety, was passed by Parliament on

Tuesday after a heated discussion in Rajya Sabha over privatisation of airports. PARLIAMENT PROCEEDINGS, SEPT. 15 UPDATES The Aircraft (Amendment) Bill, 2020, which was passed by the Lok

Sabha on March 17, was passed by the Upper House by voice vote. The Bill gives statutory powers to the Directorate General of Civil Aviation, the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security and the

Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. Civil Aviation Minister Hardeep Puri said the changes were necessary in view of the growth of the sector. The Bill empowers the aviation watchdog DGCA

in the Indian aviation ecosystem. The changes include recognising regulatory bodies such as the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau- which were

set up through various government notifications but didn't have a defined role under the parent Act, as well as air navigation services. ALSO READ: ADANI AGREES TO ACQUIRE MAJORITY

STAKE IN MUMBAI AIRPORT CRONY CAPITALISM During the discussion on the Bill, Congress MP K.C. Venugopal in his maiden speech in the House hit out at the government over the privatisation of

six airports that had been given to the Adani Group. He demanded an inquiry into the matter, saying it was “crony capitalism” and a violation of the rules that one company was given all six

airports. “Airports Authority of India has become AAA — Airports Authority of Adani,” Mr. Venugopal alleged. BJP MP G.V.L Narasimha Rao responded by saying the “real crony capitalism” was

prevalent in the UPA government’s tenure in the 2G spectrum and coal block auctions. He said Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s objective was to make air travel safer and accessible to all

sections of society. ALSO READ: ADANI GROUP, AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA INK PACTS FOR MANAGING AHMEDABAD AND TWO OTHER AIRPORTS Trinamool Congress MP Dinesh Trivedi said as a former pilot he

understood the problems facing the civil aviation sector. He said there was need to do away with the entire Aircraft Act, 1934. On the impending sale of Air India, Mr. Trivedi said: “If Air

India was not there, the private sector wouldn’t be there. So please don't sell Air India”. OVERSIGHT OVER REGULATORS Former Civil Aviation Minister and NCP MP Praful Patel said the

Bill was important as the aviation sector grows, the regulations have to be in line with international requirements. However, he said it was not clear how these regulators would be

appointed. He also said there was a need to increase the number of airports in the country, citing the examples of the pending Jewar and Navi Mumbai airport projects that were approved in

2007 and 2005 respectively. Referring to the Opposition’s critique that the Bill gave the government superintendence over the regulators, BJP MP Lt. Gen (retired) Dr. D.P. Vats said there

was a need for “unity of command”. ALSO READ: LOA FOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AIRPORT ISSUED TO ADANI GROUP “The government’s say should be final because the responsibility of the government is

final,” he said. Replying to the debate, Mr. Puri said Mr. Venugopal had raised concerns over the shortage of air traffic controllers and near misses, but the government had recruited 1,000

air traffic controllers in the past three years and was close to the target of 3,500 before the COVID-19 pandemic slowed down the process. On the issue of privatisation, he cited the example

of Delhi and Mumbai airport being privatised in 2006, leading to the AAI getting ₹29,000 crore in revenue that helped in developing airports in the country. He said the six airports that

were awarded in 2018 accounted for 9% of traffic, while Delhi and Mumbai accounted for 33% of traffic and earnings. ALSO READ:  CONGRESS QUESTIONS CENTRE’S AIRPORT PRIVATISATION PROCESS

“Now, to talk in terms of six airports being given to one entity, let me just place this in perspective. When these two airports, Delhi and Mumbai, were privatised in 2006, all subsequent

efforts at privatisation contained a stipulation to the effect that prior experience was necessary. So, we fell into a trap of our own making — not by this government, I don’t want to make

this a political point — that unless you had previous experience, which means unless you had done either Delhi or Mumbai, you could not participate in the process, which, in effect, meant

that for 15 years, no competitive open bidding could take place,” he said. He said when the bidding for the Jewar airport took place none of the previous successful bidders could

participate. On the COVID-19 situation, Mr. Puri said domestic air traffic would return to pre-COVID levels by the end of the year. ALSO READ:  ADANI’S HIGH BIDS DELAYING AIRPORTS TAKEOVER?

Responding to criticism that Vande Bharat Mission flights to evacuate Indians stranded abroad had very high fares, Mr. Puri said: “I made it very clear right in the beginning that an air

operation like this cannot be carried out through donations or the Gurudwara Langar Society; that has to be paid. The amount we charged was the lowest ever.” On the privatisation of Air

India, he said the choice was not between privatisation and non-privatisation, but between “privatisation and closing down”. Published - September 15, 2020 03:32 pm IST Read Comments Remove

SEE ALL PRINT RELATED TOPICS parliament / Parliament proceedings / Rajya Sabha