Play all audios:
Gul Panag said that while protests are a crucial part of engagement, she is against violence, stone-pelting and damage to public property. “Lastly, the most important question is whether
this Act goes against what is written in the Constitution. That is an answer only a competent court can give,” she said. Echoing Panag’s views, Sharad Kelkar also said that he is against
violence. “No student would want to choose the path of violence. There is some mix-up happening and then it turns to a violent protest. There are some people who are in favour of CAA and
some against. The latter have full right to protest and they are doing it peacefully. Mumbai showed how to protest,” he said. The actor said that it’s the taxpayers’ money that’s being
destroyed when public property is vandalised. “Secondly, I feel that hearing of petitions should be fast-tracked to prevent more violence.” As for migration, Kelkar said that there should be
a strict law to prevent more people from coming into the country which is already overpopulated.