Rajesh Yadav, a 35-year-old environmental activist from Madhya Pradesh has been a witness to the sharp rise in youth-led climate movements in India.

“Zyada se zyada degree le lenge, naukri to waise bhi nahi mil rahi. (The government can take away their degrees, anyway they’re not getting jobs). They have nothing to lose and they aren’t

afraid to raise their voices,” Rajesh believes as he explains this trend. These youngsters are set to preserve something that is indispensable and beautiful - with 10 national parks, 25

wildlife sanctuaries and some large rivers draining into the state, Madhya Pradesh has the largest registered forest area in the country.

Why, you ask? What was once a battle of few villages of the Chhatarpur district became the talk of the nation overnight. The Twitter rage and the ongoing protest were against the Bunder

diamond mine project.

This disastrous proposal was followed by Essel Mining & Industries Limited (EMIL), an Aditya Birla Group Company in 2019, winning the bid for Bunder diamond block which is estimated to have

34 million carats of rough diamond.

That’s not it - to supposedly alleviate the water woes of Bundelkhand, the Union Ministry of Jal Shakti on 22 March, signed an MoU with the chief ministers of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar

Pradesh to implement the Ken-Betwa River Linking Project (KBLP). The argument is to fill up water in Betwa river by linking it with Ken which the government claims has surplus water.

"This is not development but destruction", says Hanumant Pratap Singh, ex-state wildlife board member when asked if it’s worth spending Rs 35,000 crore and cutting 23 lakh trees for this

project. “It’s a disaster for the people living here, there’s no surplus water in the Ken basin. The detailed project report (DPR) of the KBLP on which the project is based was published

back in 2010 and contains hydrological data of 2003-04. They didn’t even bother to conduct a new study,” he adds.

Almost 220 km from the Panna district, another tension is brewing. The decision to divert Dumna forest’s land for multiple projects has been met by strong opposition by the locals in

Jabalpur.

Conservationists warn that such developments could have devastating ecological consequences on this urban forest which is home to leopards, barking deer, golden jackal, jungle cat, asiatic

wildcat, wild boar and at least 300 species of birds.

Madhya Pradesh is a mineral and forest rich state with the highest registered forest area in the country but the state also has a sizable tribal and rural population which is dependent on

these forests for their livelihood and basic needs.

The Community Forest Rights-Learning and Advocacy group (CFR-LA) in a 2016 report identified Madhya Pradesh as a “laggard” state in its implementation of Community Forest Resource (CFR)

rights, which allow communities “to use, manage and govern forests within the traditional boundaries of villages.”

According to the Indian Bureau of Mines (IBM), Madhya Pradesh alone accounts for about 90.18 percent of India’s total diamond reserves. However, the situation for the inhabitants of the

forests isn’t gleamy at all. Poverty, landlessness, unemployment and migration has plagued the adivasi community for years and every new mining project marks a deeper dent on their history,

traditions and culture.

Ironically, the assessment report submitted by Chhattarpur's Chief Forest Conservator (CFC) on 2 January 2021 claimed that the tribals of the area were "not dependent" on the proposed forest

and that "no right of tribals has been recognized in the area".

“We aren’t educated. It’s not like they are going to provide us with desk jobs. We all know how day labourers in these mines work for 12-16 hours under inhuman conditions,” says Chotu

Barela, a local adivasi, when asked why the community is not in favour of diamond mining when the company claims to provide them with 400 jobs (directly and indirectly).

Explaining how almost 13 schools in the block have shut down in recent years, he adds, “People here aren’t aware and educated. What we need is schools, basic healthcare facilities, roads and

electricity. Don’t we deserve that without a company setting up its plants here? Water is scarce and with the mining project coming up, all of it will be diverted to their needs. How are we

supposed to irrigate our lands?”

Sadly, for the policy makers, the narrative around conserving forests has always been about planting trees. This explains why indigenous communities and their co-existence with the forests

are considered least by the planners.

In another campaign, Ankit Sharma, an advocate who has been raising his voice against the Ken-Betwa river linking project explains how the central government decided to go ahead with the

plan despite the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) appointed by the Supreme Court challenging the proposition.

“The forest land which falls under the core tiger habitat of Panna Tiger Reserve involved in submergence is an unique ecosystem of morphological significance with unique and rich

biodiversity. An ecosystem like this cannot be recreated. In an ideal situation, it would be best to avoid such projects in such areas and specifically when it runs the risk of providing

justification or unhealthy precedence for more such developmental projects that will not be in the interest of wildlife,” the CEC report filed in 2019 states.

The pain and the trauma that displaced people go through is mostly covered with the band-aid of monetary compensation but a deeper understanding suggests that the amount given is transient

and doesn’t make up for the lost permanent source of income; their land.

“We had 12 bigha of land and almost 50 percent has been taken by the government for dam construction. What is left is the unfertile part of the land which is not good for agriculture. I have

four kids to feed and the compensation amount of 3 lakh got exhausted in one year. If given an option, I would have never agreed to let go of my land,” says Bharat Kondar, an Adivasi who

lost his land to the construction of Runj Dam in the Panna district.

With more projects coming up, the wildlife is being pushed into limited spaces and indigenous communities who share the forests with animals are bearing the brunt of it. Industries,

highways, dams could further fragment the habitats and make their long-range movement more challenging.

“The construction of a 222 km long and 30m wide canal in the core and buffer area of Panna Tiger Reserve will divide it into two parts. This will have serious implications on the movement of

tigers. How do you expect an animal to cross the cemented canal?” asks Mr. Singh. He argues that as we continue to push wildlife out of their natural habitats, human-animal conflicts will

become inevitable.

With the unfolding COVID-19 crisis, rights of citizens being curtailed and on ground movement becoming limited, many social movements have had to rethink their old strategies and turning to

online activism was just the right thing to do.

“I first read about Buxwaha through a report published in Dainik Bhaskar. But when the message resurfaced on our WhatsApp groups, we realised it needed immediate discussion. We conducted a

zoom meeting and called our environment action groups to join in. Youngsters suggested conducting Twitter storms and it is only when the issue started trending and media reached out to me, I

realised the wonders that social media could do for the environment movements,” says Dr Dharmendra Kumar, who hails from Bihar but has been actively campaigning on ground in the Chhatarpur

district to save the Buxwaha forest.

“Through digital platforms, anyone who cares for the climate can join in the movement and extend support. And with cleaner skies witnessed during the pandemic, people envisaged the kind of

post-pandemic world they want to live in. People realise one common cause; climate change,” says Avinash Chanchal, a campaigner with Greenpeace.

“The protest and the issue is not new. Adivasis here have been protesting for years, but with social media, support for them is pouring in from across the country. Buxwaha has supporters

from Punjab, Kerala, UP, Gujrat, Delhi and many other states,” Abhishek Khare, a local of the Panna district says.

“In the future also, we are determined to stand against any project which is a threat to our ecosystems. No matter what or where. When it comes to the environment, all of us come together

despite differences in our political leanings and opinions,” he adds.

With smartphones in hand, people realize they could have a voice and be heard if they stand together. Their actions whether it’s sharing a post, or retweeting a thread or sending an email

could add to the voice of the movement. An online petition by Jhatkaa.org for the Buxwaha forest has garnered more than 88,000 signatures. A youth-led group, There Is No Earth B says, “we

are amplifying the voice of the people fighting to save Dumna. We have been hosting its official site, helping with tweet decks, content and AR (augmented reality) filters for more than a

year.”

With more campaigns sprouting everyday reporting the flaws of these projects and their blindness to the ecological impacts, the ones supporting are labelled as anti-developmentalists and

anarchists. “Environment vs development debate is created by corporations. You have to define development. Is having access to clean air and water not development? Not putting people at

serious health risks, not development?” asks Yash Marwah, founder of environment collective, Let India Breathe.

These 20-something young people who create an Instagram account of a new forest movement, make the Ministry server crash by bombarding them with emails, conduct awareness drives, hold

climate strikes, and want to put a stop to the widespread decimation of ecosystems and cultures. They aren’t afraid to stand with affected communities and speak truth to power.

Instead of cracking down on protestors and environmental campaigns, governments must take into account the long-term sustainable interests of the affected indigenous communities, and the

wildlife. The social cost of these projects needs to be factored in and consultation between state and indigenous people at every level should be accounted for.

We need a booming economy and better infrastructure but it’s high time we stop putting marginalised communities at stake for it. This could be best summarised by words of P. Sainath in his

famous book, Everyone Loves a Good Drought:

“Who constitutes the nation? Only the elite? Or do the hundred of millions of poor in India also make up the nation? Are their interests never identified with national interests? Or is there

more than one nation?”

“That is a question you often run up against in some of India’s poorest areas. Areas where extremely poor people go into destitution making way for firing ranges, coal mines, power projects,

dams, sanctuaries and even poultry farms. If the cost they bear is ‘the price of development’, then the rest of the ‘nation’ is having one endless free lunch.”

(Rashmi is a Delhi based campaigner working in the areas of air pollution, climate change and gender justice at Jhatkaa.org . She’s interested in writing about risks possessed by the climate

crisis in rural India. You can reach out to her on Twitter (@donotrushmee) and Instagram (@_rushmenot). This is an opinion piece. The views expressed are the author's own. The Quint neither

endorses nor is responsible for the same.)

(At The Quint, we are answerable only to our audience. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member. Because the truth is worth it.)

(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)