It was a routine that the young Hyderabad veterinarian followed regularly. She would ride in her scooter to a busy toll plaza in Hyderabad, park it there, and then take a cab to the clinic

where she worked. On her way back, she followed the same routine, in reverse. Here was an educated young professional, who had worked out a way to negotiate Hyderabad’s public spaces while

keeping herself safe. But, on 27 November, despite taking precautionary measures like alerting her sister, she was dragged away, raped, smothered to death while being assaulted, her body

transported to a secluded spot 25 kms away, and then set on fire. THE CULTURE OF RAPE & PUNISHMENT The case caused massive outrage across India. Politicians spoke of the need to ‘lynch’

and began to ‘escape’. The police then fired at them in ‘self-defence’ and killed them. By early morning, hundreds had gathered at the encounter site. Some raised slogans hailing the police,

as others showered petals. School girls screamed in joy as they passed in their school bus. Popular actor Anupam Kher tweeted “congratulations and Jai ho to Telengana police for shooting

down the four rapists”. The _dramatis personae_ of the entire series of events give us a peek into the entire culture that surrounds rape and its punishment in India. The victim herself, a

young professional following certain rules, to negotiate the restricted freedoms that urban India gave her. Men acting as a group to plan her rape and murder. Public outrage at the failure

of law and order. Populist politics riding on that outrage. Encounter killings by a police that was under great pressure. Public support for such instant justice. WHY DOES RAPE INCITE MORE

ANGER THAN MURDER? But, why does rape excite such public anger, which gruesome murders often don’t? One reason is that rape is considered to be a crime against the ‘honour’ of society.

Female sexuality is not just a woman’s own property, it is something she protects for her family and community at large. > So, when she is raped, her ‘honour’ is ‘looted’ (izzat lut > 

jaana). It conjures up images of invaders raiding and pillaging > populations. As Michel Foucault, that enfant terrible of French intellect, provocatively pointed out some 40 years ago,

treating rape as a qualitatively different crime from any violent attack on the body, amounts to saying that “sexuality as such, in the body, has a preponderant place, the sexual organ

isn't like a hand, hair, or a nose. It therefore has to be protected, surrounded, invested in any case with legislation that isn't that pertaining to the rest of the body.” RAPE

& THE IDEA OF FEMALE ‘HONOUR’ This idea of sexuality is a crucial aspect in the process through which a female body gets _feminized_ as a sexual object, who is constantly in fear of

‘losing her honour’, and thus, ‘dishonouring’ her family and community. A ‘good’ man recognises that another woman’s sexuality is ‘sacrosanct’ because it maintains the balance of ‘honour’ in

society. Rape, thus, becomes _unthinkable_, because it is a crime against the entire moral order of things. Only ‘perverts’ and ‘evil’ men can do it. > On the other hand, one of the ways

 to punish another man, a family > or community is to rape ‘their’ women. This is what makes rapes common during riots and wars. Rape is equally a way to ‘discipline’ ‘wayward’ women,

those who challenge male rights over their sexuality. By assaulting the core of their feminized existence, rape teaches them to fall in line and understand their place in the social order.

Patriarchy treats such rape not only as justified, but even morally right. OBJECT OF MALE DESIRE The manner in which culture, custom and law ‘produce’ the _feminized_ body, simultaneously

produces male sexuality, as a corollary. The object of male desire is to possess, her ‘virginity taken’. The man whose wife is promiscuous is seen to be a weakling, someone to be treated

with derision. A promiscuous husband on the other hand is seen as someone giving in to his baser natural instincts, who has not fulfilled the ‘responsibility’ of looking after and

‘protecting’ his wife. The wife becomes an object of pity. The underlying premise is that male sexuality is naturally aggressive, conquering and possessive. And, a man who cannot protect and

own _his_ woman’s sexuality, stands dishonoured. The idea of male strength translates into virility, size of the penis, and variety of sexual conquests. This becomes a founding condition

for male bonding via sexuality-related rituals such as the use of sexist expletives or jocular sexual commentary about female friends and acquaintances. RAPE: AN EXPRESSION OF ‘MALE POWER’

The relationship between rape and such male bonding rituals has been well documented in the case of fraternities in American universities. In developing countries, such rapes are often

committed by groups of young unemployed or under-employed men, who live in groups in urban slums, away from their homes and communities. Such men, disempowered and disenfranchised in

everyday life, try to take out the frustrations of their own powerlessness on the unfamiliar forms of feminized bodies they find in urban public spaces. > Rape, especially 

‘multiple-perpetrator rape’ becomes an > expression of male ‘power’ against the only people who can be > subdued – women caught alone in an isolated urban space. Rape is both

‘entertainment’ for the group, and a form of ‘disciplining’ the woman. It is a way to establish control over a world which is beyond control. The assault itself becomes an act of

exhibitionism and voyeurism, and it establishes hierarchy in the male pack. It is interesting that in South Africa, a colloquial term for such rapes is ‘streamlining’ or a method of

‘punishing’ a woman’s transgressions from the norm. HOW PATRIARCHY PRODUCES MALE & FEMALE SEXUALITY Male sexuality sets up a specific object of desire – the ‘pure’ and ‘submissive’

woman, who says ‘no’ because she ‘wants’ to be ‘dominated’. This is one of the characteristics of ‘acquaintance-rape’, where young girls become targets of older men related or known to her.

The man uses the secrecy surrounding the incest-taboo and the cloak of proximity to dominate and subjugate. But, if the way patriarchy produces both male and female sexuality is to blame for

rape, shouldn’t societies that give more power to women have lower incidence of rape? Peggy Reeves Sanday, pioneer of cultural studies on rape, argues exactly that. She studied 95 tribal

communities and found that nearly half of them were entirely rape-free, another one-third had a low incidence of rape. RAPE LINKED WITH VALOURISATION OF CONFLICT & WAR What caused this?

Sanday found that “gender relations were marked by respect for women as citizens, significant female power and authority, and the near absence of interpersonal aggression in social

relations.” These were not isolated tribes. Amongst them was the Minangkbau, the fourth largest community of Indonesia. The Minangkbau are a matrilineal society where women play a major role

in public life. Sanday cautions readers from concluding that matriliny alone makes a community rape-free. > Her research shows that rape is often associated with the > valourisation 

of aggression, conflict and war. That brings me to my own provocative question: Does valourisation of a strong State, of war and conquest, of avenging perceived historical wrongs, strengthen

aggressive forms of male sexuality? Does ‘machismo’ in public culture create grounds for violent expressions of sexual behaviour? Is use of rape to ‘subjugate’ a woman any different from

the lust for war? _(The author was Senior Managing Editor, NDTV India & NDTV Profit. He now runs the independent YouTube channel_ ‘_Desi Democracy’. He tweets_ _@AunindyoC__. This is an

opinion piece. The views expressed above are the author’s own._ _THE QUINT_ _neither endorses nor is responsible for them.)_ Published: 06 Dec 2019, 5:55 PM IST