Play all audios:
Share article Remove Save to favorites Save to favorites Print Email Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Copy URL Philadelphia
In 2013, a national panel of education experts called for U.S. states and districts to move away from a focus on testing primarily for accountability, and toward building tests that would
help teachers provide more individualized instruction and support for students.
More than a decade after the Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education, experts at the American Educational Research Association conference in Philadelphia pointed out that
the technology now exists for more nuanced measurement, but states and districts have not yet developed the training and infrastructure to help teachers use the new tools effectively.
“We don’t really set our educators and our students up for success right now,” said LaVerne Evans Srinivasan, of the Carnegie Corp. of New York, a philanthropic group that supports education
programs (distinct from the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching), during an AERA symposium. “Our educators are at a disadvantage in terms of having the professional learning
support that they need to have digital literacy and competency to work with new [artificial intelligence] technology to feel confident that they can use these tools and technologies ... to
both reduce the pain of their workload, but also optimize their ability to differentiate learning and personalize learning for young people.”
See Also Open image caption Close imagecaption E+ / Getty Assessment What the Research Says What Teachers Should Know About Integrating Formative Assessment With Instruction Sarah D. Sparks, April 17, 2024 • 3 min read Remove
Save to favorites
Testing tools built on artificial intelligence systems have expanded rapidly in K-12.
James Moore III, head of the National Science Foundation’s education directorate, said NSF’s STEM education grants alone have invested $75 million in the last year alone in artificial
intelligence-related education projects, such as an open-access, online assessment of oral language proficiency in several languages and a program to boost student persistence and
collaboration in science.
But E. Wyatt Gordon, vice president and head of evaluation systems at the computer-adaptive testing company Pearson VUE (for Virtual University Enterprises), said, so far, most AI testing
tools “essentially amount to learners asking fact-based questions, and getting fact-based answers.”
“We know that’s not a good teaching environment. So the challenge lies in transforming those interactions into effective learning experiences,” Gordon said.
That means, for example, using programs that collect data about the strategies students use to solve problems—not just checking correct answers—and then relaying information to teachers
about whether a student has particular misconceptions about a concept or less efficient learning strategies.
‘The education sector is very slow to evolve and change’Some high-profile assessments are already trying to leverage AI to provide more nuanced information. The 2025 Program for International Student Assessment, for example, will include
performance tasks in which students may work with an AI-driven chatbot, to ensure students have basic background knowledge on a subject and track students’ decisionmaking approach to
completing tasks.
“The challenge is, the education sector is very slow to evolve and change,” Srinivasan said. “Already, we have young people educated at an enormous disadvantage by the limited progress that
we’ve made in having measurement and assessment keep up with the progress that we’re making in innovations of how learning happens in classrooms.”
For example, she noted that the Carnegie Corp. has supported efforts to redesign high schools for the last two decades. “Those new high school designs were based on assessing mastery and
competency,” Srinivasan said, “but when we implemented those designs, we didn’t have the tools to make it easy to adjust how we measure and assess progress toward mastery of rigorous
material.”
In a newly released report, the National Academy of Education recommends states and districts create both formal training systems to help teachers understand how to use different kinds of
assessments, and informal networks of school leaders and mentors to share best practices.
Sarah D. Sparks Follow Unfollow Assistant Editor, Education Week Sarah D. Sparks covers the teaching profession and pedagogy for Education Week. twitter email Related Tags: Standardized
Testing Research