Play all audios:
Grant reviewers are increasingly focusing on the scientific and social impact of proposed research projects. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of
subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs
* Contact customer support AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Amber Dance is a freelance writer in Torrance, California., Amber Dance Authors * Amber Dance View author
publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS IN NATURE RESEARCH Extra scrutiny for ‘grandee grantees’ Science funding:
Duel to the death Funding: Got to get a grant Writing a first grant proposal A guide to grant writing for the clinical researcher Nature News blog: NSF takes broad look at broader impacts
RELATED EXTERNAL LINKS Grant Training Center Meg Bouvier Medical Writing NIH Quick Guide for Grant Applications NIH RePORTER RCUK Guidance for Pathways to Impact RCUK Pathways to Impact case
studies RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Dance, A. Impact: Pack a punch. _Nature_ 502, 397–398 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7471-397a Download citation * Published: 16 October 2013 * Issue Date: 17 October 2013 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7471-397a SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you
share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the
Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative