Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Prostate cancer is a major global health concern with limited treatment options for advanced disease. Its heterogeneity challenges the identification of crucial driver genes
implicated in disease progression. Activating protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor is associated with cancer since the first identification of its subunits, the proto-oncogenes JUN and FOS.
Whereas both _JUN_ and _FOS_ have been implicated in prostate cancer, this study provides the first functional evidence that _FOS_ acts as a tumor suppressor during prostate cancer
progression and invasion. Data mining revealed decreased _FOS_ expression in prostate cancer and a further downregulation in metastatic disease, consistent with _FOS_ expression in cell
lines derived from different prostate cancer stages. FOS deficiency in prostate cancer cell lines increases cell proliferation and induces oncogenic pathway alterations. Importantly, in vivo
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated _Fos_ and _Pten_ double mutation in murine prostate epithelium results in increased proliferation and invasiveness compared to the abrogation of Pten alone.
Interestingly, enhanced Jun expression is observed in the murine prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia lacking Fos. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of _Jun_ combined with _Fos_ and _Pten_
deficiency diminishes the increased proliferation rate in vivo but not the ability to form invasive disease. Overall, we demonstrate that loss of Fos promotes disease progression from
clinical latent prostate cancer to advanced disease through accelerated proliferation and invasiveness, partly through Jun. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview
of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 50 print issues and online access $259.00 per year only
$5.18 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS TRAF7-TARGETED HOXA5 ACTS AS
A TUMOR SUPPRESSOR IN PROSTATE CANCER PROGRESSION AND STEMNESS VIA TRANSCRIPTIONALLY ACTIVATING SPRY2 AND REGULATING MEK/ERK SIGNALING Article Open access 16 October 2023 UNVEILING RACK1: A
KEY REGULATOR OF THE PI3K/AKT PATHWAY IN PROSTATE CANCER DEVELOPMENT Article 13 November 2024 _MEIS1_ DOWN-REGULATION BY MYC MEDIATES PROSTATE CANCER DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ELEVATED _HOXB13_
EXPRESSION AND AR ACTIVITY Article Open access 17 July 2020 REFERENCES * Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of
incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. Article Google Scholar * Harris WP, Mostaghel EA, Nelson PS, Montgomery B. Androgen
deprivation therapy: progress in understanding mechanisms of resistance and optimizing androgen depletion. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009;6:76–85. Article CAS Google Scholar * Evans AJ.
Treatment effects in prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2018;31:S110–21. Article Google Scholar * The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. The molecular taxonomy of primary prostate cancer.
Cell. 2015;163:1011–25. Article Google Scholar * Wang G, Zhao D, Spring DJ, DePinho RA. Genetics and biology of prostate cancer. Genes Dev. 2018;32:1105–40. Article CAS Google Scholar *
Shaulian E, Karin M. AP-1 in cell proliferation and survival. Oncogene. 2001;20:2390–400. Article CAS Google Scholar * Shaulian E, Karin M. AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death.
Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:E131–6. Article CAS Google Scholar * Eferl R, Wagner EF. AP-1: a double-edged sword in tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:859–68. Article CAS Google Scholar *
Edwards J, Krishna NS, Mukherjee R, Bartlett JM. The role of c-Jun and c-Fos expression in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Pathol. 2004;204:153–8. Article CAS Google Scholar *
Konishi N, Shimada K, Nakamura M, Ishida E, Ota I, Tanaka N, et al. Function of JunB in transient amplifying cell senescence and progression of human prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res.
2008;14:4408–16. Article CAS Google Scholar * Thomsen MK, Bakiri L, Hasenfuss SC, Wu H, Morente M, Wagner EF. Loss of JUNB/AP-1 promotes invasive prostate cancer. Cell Death Differ.
2015;22:574–82. Article CAS Google Scholar * Xu R, Hu J. The role of JNK in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic strategies. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;121:109679. Article CAS
Google Scholar * Hubner A, Mulholland DJ, Standen CL, Karasarides M, Cavanagh-Kyros J, Barrett T, et al. JNK and PTEN cooperatively control the development of invasive adenocarcinoma of the
prostate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:12046–51. Article CAS Google Scholar * Millena AC, Vo BT, Khan SA. JunD is required for proliferation of prostate cancer cells and plays a role
in transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-induced inhibition of cell proliferation. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:17964–76. Article CAS Google Scholar * Ouyang X, Jessen WJ, Al-Ahmadie H, Serio
AM, Lin Y, Shih WJ, et al. Activator protein-1 transcription factors are associated with progression and recurrence of prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68:2132–44. Article CAS Google
Scholar * Chandran UR, Dhir R, Ma C, Michalopoulos G, Becich M, Gilbertson J. Differences in gene expression in prostate cancer, normal appearing prostate tissue adjacent to cancer and
prostate tissue from cancer free organ donors. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:45. Article Google Scholar * Parisotto M, Metzger D. Genetically engineered mouse models of prostate cancer. Mol Oncol.
2013;7:190–205. Article CAS Google Scholar * Platt RJ, Chen S, Zhou Y, Yim MJ, Swiech L, Kempton HR, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell.
2014;159:440–55. Article CAS Google Scholar * Riedel M, Berthelsen MF, Bakiri L, Wagner EF, Thomsen MK. Virus delivery of CRISPR guides to the murine prostate for gene alteration. J Vis
Exp. 2018:57525. * Chandran UR, Ma C, Dhir R, Bisceglia M, Lyons-Weiler M, Liang W, et al. Gene expression profiles of prostate cancer reveal involvement of multiple molecular pathways in
the metastatic process. BMC Cancer. 2007;7:64. Article Google Scholar * Feng Z, Joos HJ, Vallan C, Muhlbauer R, Altermatt HJ, Jaggi R. Apoptosis during castration-induced regression of the
prostate is Fos dependent. Oncogene. 1998;17:2593–600. Article CAS Google Scholar * Wang S, Gao J, Lei Q, Rozengurt N, Pritchard C, Jiao J, et al. Prostate-specific deletion of the
murine Pten tumor suppressor gene leads to metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:209–21. Article CAS Google Scholar * Thomsen MK, Ambroisine L, Wynn S, Cheah KS, Foster CS,
Fisher G, et al. SOX9 elevation in the prostate promotes proliferation and cooperates with PTEN loss to drive tumor formation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:979–87. Article CAS Google Scholar *
Zincarelli C, Soltys S, Rengo G, Rabinowitz JE. Analysis of AAV serotypes 1-9 mediated gene expression and tropism in mice after systemic injection. Mol Ther. 2008;16:1073–80. Article CAS
Google Scholar * Milde-Langosch K. The Fos family of transcription factors and their role in tumourigenesis. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:2449–61. Article CAS Google Scholar * Guo JC, Li J,
Zhao YP, Zhou L, Cui QC, Zhou WX, et al. Expression of c-fos was associated with clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120332. *
Fleischmann A, Jochum W, Eferl R, Witowsky J, Wagner EF. Rhabdomyosarcoma development in mice lacking Trp53 and Fos: tumor suppression by the Fos protooncogene. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:477–82.
Article CAS Google Scholar * Wenzel A, Iseli HP, Fleischmann A, Hafezi F, Grimm C, Wagner EF, et al. Fra-1 substitutes for c-Fos in AP-1-mediated signal transduction in retinal apoptosis.
J Neurochem. 2002;80:1089–94. Article CAS Google Scholar * Min L, Ji Y, Bakiri L, Qiu Z, Cen J, Chen X, et al. Liver cancer initiation is controlled by AP-1 through SIRT6-dependent
inhibition of survivin. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:1203–11. Article CAS Google Scholar * Schreiber M, Kolbus A, Piu F, Szabowski A, Mohle-Steinlein U, Tian J, et al. Control of cell cycle
progression by c-Jun is p53 dependent. Genes Dev. 1999;13:607–19. Article CAS Google Scholar * Lapointe J, Li C, Higgins JP, van de Rijn M, Bair E, Montgomery K, et al. Gene expression
profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:811–6. Article CAS Google Scholar * Haeussler M, Schonig K, Eckert H, Eschstruth A,
Mianne J, Renaud JB, et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 2016;17:148. Article Google
Scholar Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Mette Simonsen for assistance with PET/MRI scanning. This work was funded by Danish cancer society (R146-A9394 and R204-A12490),
Ministry of health (4-1612-236/7), AUFF NOVA (E-2o15-FLS-9-8), Dagmar Marshalls Fond, Einar Willumsens Mindelegat, Harboefonden, Helge Peetz og Verner og hustru Vilma Peetz legat, Raimond og
Dagmar Ringgåed-Bohns Fond, The Aarhus University Research Foundation, and Thora og Viggo Grove’s Mindelegat (all to MKT). EFW and LB are supported by the European Research Council (grant:
ERC‐AdG 2016 CSI‐Fun-741888 to EFW) and the Medical University of Vienna. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Maria Riedel, Martin F. Berthelsen, Huiqiang Cai & Jakob Haldrup * Department of Clinical Medicine and Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Michael Borre * Department of
Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Søren R. Paludan & Martin K. Thomsen * South Denmark hospital, Vejle, Denmark Henrik Hager * Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET
Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Mikkel H. Vendelbo * Laboratory Genes and Disease, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna (MUV), Vienna, Austria Erwin F.
Wagner * Laboratory Genes and Disease, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna (MUV), Vienna, Austria Erwin F. Wagner & Latifa Bakiri * Aarhus Institute of
Advanced Studies (AIAS), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Martin K. Thomsen Authors * Maria Riedel View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *
Martin F. Berthelsen View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Huiqiang Cai View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed
Google Scholar * Jakob Haldrup View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Michael Borre View author publications You can also search for this
author inPubMed Google Scholar * Søren R. Paludan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Henrik Hager View author publications You can also
search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Mikkel H. Vendelbo View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Erwin F. Wagner View author
publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Latifa Bakiri View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Martin K.
Thomsen View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Martin K. Thomsen. ETHICS DECLARATIONS CONFLICT OF
INTEREST The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURES SUPPLEMENTARY METHODS TABLE S1 RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE
Riedel, M., Berthelsen, M.F., Cai, H. _et al._ In vivo CRISPR inactivation of Fos promotes prostate cancer progression by altering the associated AP-1 subunit Jun. _Oncogene_ 40, 2437–2447
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-01724-6 Download citation * Received: 10 December 2020 * Revised: 11 February 2021 * Accepted: 18 February 2021 * Published: 05 March 2021 * Issue
Date: 01 April 2021 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-01724-6 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry,
a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative