Role of mns in the intergranular corrosion and depassivation of sensitized type 304 stainless steel

Role of mns in the intergranular corrosion and depassivation of sensitized type 304 stainless steel

Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT During polarization in 1 M NaCl (pH 5.4), intergranular corrosion of sensitized re-sulfurized Type 304 stainless steel occurred after pit initiation at MnS inclusions. Intergranular


corrosion occurred when the pitting corrosion reached a Cr-depleted region along the sensitized grain boundaries. During depassivation under open-circuit conditions in 1 M NaCl (pH 1.0),


MnS dissolution occurred as the first step, and the second step was the initiation of intergranular corrosion. Finally, dissolution of the steel matrix occurred. The role of MnS in the


initiation of intergranular corrosion and depassivation of sensitized steel is discussed. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS MICRO-ELECTROCHEMICAL INSIGHTS INTO PIT INITIATION SITE ON


AGED UNS S32750 SUPER DUPLEX STAINLESS STEEL Article Open access 04 March 2023 PITTING CORROSION CHARACTERISTICS OF SINTERED TYPE 316 L STAINLESS STEEL: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PORES AND MNS


Article Open access 07 June 2024 ELECTROCHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MNSE INCLUSIONS AND IMPROVING THE PITTING CORROSION RESISTANCE OF STAINLESS STEEL VIA SE MICROALLOYING Article Open access 26


March 2024 INTRODUCTION In stainless steels, sulfide inclusions such as MnS act as initiation sites for pitting corrosion and have been the focus of many studies1,2,3,4,5,6,7. However,


limited research has been conducted on the role of sulfide inclusions in the intergranular corrosion and depassivation of sensitized stainless steels8. Cr depletion owing to the formation of


Cr-carbides at the grain boundaries is known to decrease the corrosion resistance of stainless steels. When stainless steels are heated to ~1000 K, such as by welding, Cr-carbides


precipitate at the grain boundaries, causing Cr depletion9. Cr depletion occurs not only along grain boundaries but also at phase boundaries (_γ_/_α_, _σ_/_α_)10,11, oxide inclusions12, and


Cr-nitrides13,14. Moreover, in ferritic stainless steels, spinodal decomposition causes Cr depletion15,16. Because the processes of heating and cooling are repeated in additive


manufacturing, the occurrence of Cr depletion should be noted17,18. Thus, Cr depletion is an important factor to consider when analyzing the causes of corrosion in heat-treated stainless


steels. The degree of sensitization (Cr depletion) has been successfully assessed based on the weight loss and/or intergranular corrosion morphology in acids with a pH lower than the


depassivation pH, such as via the Huey, Strauss, and Streicher tests19. Although the depassivation of Cr-depleted regions and intergranular corrosion occur in acidic solutions, stainless


steels are regularly used in solutions with pH values higher than the depassivation pH. Therefore, in this study, the corrosion behavior of a sensitized stainless steel was investigated in a


near-neutral pH and acidic solutions. In chloride solutions at near-neutral pH, corrosion occurs with pitting morphology even in sensitized stainless steels, and thus, the corrosion


resistance is assessed by the pitting potential. For example, Ziętala ‍et ‍al.20 studied the corrosion resistance of Type 316 L stainless steel fabricated using laser-engineered net shaping


(LENS). They reported that the lower pitting corrosion resistance of the LENS-fabricated 316 L was due to the formation of Cr-depleted regions in the steel matrix. Ganesh et al.21 studied


the corrosion and sensitization of laser rapidly manufactured (LRMed) Type 316 L stainless steel. With respect to the wrought specimens, the LRMed steel exhibited a lower pitting corrosion


resistance. The pitting potential of stainless steels decreases with decreasing Cr concentration22. Therefore, the lower pitting corrosion resistance of stainless steels produced via heat


treatment is attributed to Cr depletion; however, there are other factors that lower pitting corrosion resistance, such as sulfide inclusions1,2,3,4,5,6,7. In the case of depassivation, the


corrosion resistance of stainless steels also decreases with decreasing Cr concentration23,24. Therefore, the ready occurrence of the depassivation of sensitized steels can be explained by


Cr depletion. However, sulfide inclusions should be considered in this explanation because dissolution species of sulfide have been reported to promote depassivation6. The existence of


sulfide inclusions in Cr-depleted regions is expected to initiate the depassivation process, but to the best of our knowledge, the details have not been reported. Sulfide inclusions are


crucial factors in the initiation of pitting in stainless steels25,26,27,28,29,30. Chiba et ‍al. 6 reported that a small area without MnS exhibited an extremely high pitting potential


exceeding 0.6 V (vs. Ag/AgCl, 3.33 M KCl), even for Type 304 stainless steel in 3 M NaCl at 298 ‍K‍. In a small area where MnS was absent, Takayama et al. 31. demonstrated that no pitting


was generated on Type 304 stainless steel, even when potentiodynamic polarization was performed up to the oxygen evolution region in 1 M NaCl at 348 K. Furthermore, it was reported that the


depassivation of solution-treated Type 304 stainless steel in acidic NaCl solutions was initiated by localized dissolution, such as pitting corrosion, rather than general corrosion25.


Therefore, sulfide inclusion dissolution is expected to be involved in the depassivation of stainless steels. In this study, the role of MnS in the initiation of intergranular corrosion and


depassivation of sensitized stainless steel was studied in 1 M NaCl at pH 5.4 and 1.0. The relationship between pitting at MnS and intergranular corrosion was investigated at pH 5.4. The


relationships among MnS dissolution, intergranular corrosion, and depassivation were investigated at pH 1.0. Real-time in ‍situ observations were performed on a small area of MnS. A


re-sulfurized Type 304 stainless steel was used because large MnS inclusions are suitable for observing inclusion dissolution. The technique of fabricating a small electrode area containing


a single corrosion initiation site and observing the surface during electrochemical measurements is simple but effective for elucidating localized corrosion mechanisms32,33,34,35,36,37.


RESULTS MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION Figure 1 shows optical microscopy (OM) images of the solution-treated and sensitized specimens after electrolytic etching in 10 mass% oxalic acid. The grain


boundaries of the solution-treated specimen were slightly etched, but almost all of the grain boundaries of the sensitized specimen were heavily etched, indicating that the steel was fully


sensitized by heat treatment at 923 K for 20 h38. Figure 2a shows a scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of a grain boundary of the sensitized specimen. For this


observation, a focused ion beam (FIB) lift-out specimen was prepared along Line 1 to traverse the grain boundary, as shown in the inset of Fig. 2a. Figure 2b shows the EDS map of Cr in the


area surrounded by yellow lines in Fig. 2a, and Fig. 2c shows the results of the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) line analysis of the Cr concentration along Line A–B shown in Fig.


2a, b. In the STEM image, precipitates were observed along the grain boundary, and Cr accumulated in the precipitates, as seen in Fig. 2b, c. The electron diffraction patterns of the


precipitates were consistent with those of Cr23C6 (figure not shown). In Fig. 2b, c, Cr was clearly depleted near the grain boundary precipitates, and the minimum Cr concentration was ~8


‍mass%. The above results indicate that Cr depletion occurred at the grain boundaries of the sensitized specimen. Figure 3a shows an OM image of the as-polished surface of the sensitized


specimen. In the steel used in this study, S was added to form MnS inclusions, and large elongated inclusions were observed. Figure 3b shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of a


typical inclusion and the corresponding EDS maps. Mn and S were clearly detected in the inclusion. The intensity of the Cr signal in the inclusion was weaker than that in the steel matrix.


However, a small amount of Cr was detected in the inclusion. The relative concentrations at Point 1 were Fe: 15 at.%, Cr: 9 at.%, Ni: 2 at.%, Mn: 37 at.%, and S: 37 at.%. In addition to Cr,


Fe was detected. Some of Cr and Fe signals may have originated from the steel matrix, but the inclusion was hypothesized to be MnS with small amounts of Cr and Fe, e.g., (Mn, ‍Cr, ‍Fe)S,


because the existence of this type of inclusion has been reported in a duplex stainless steel39. For simplicity, this type of inclusion is referred to as MnS herein. No differences in the


composition and morphology of the MnS inclusions were observed between the solution-treated and sensitized specimens. Furthermore, there were no differences between the MnS inclusions on the


grain boundaries and those in the grains in terms of composition and morphology. PITTING CORROSION RESISTANCE Figure 4a shows the potentiodynamic polarization curves of the solution-treated


and sensitized specimens in 1 M NaCl (pH 5.4). For these measurements, the electrode area was 1 ‍cm × 1 cm. For both specimens, potentiodynamic polarization was started at −0.2 V, and the


cathodic current was measured until ~−0.1 V; then, the anodic current was measured. Above −0.03 V, small current oscillations due to metastable pitting were generated for both specimens. As


shown in Fig. 4a, sensitization lowered the pitting potential. Figure 4b, c shows SEM images of a corroded area and the corresponding EDS maps of S and Mn. For the solution-treated specimen,


pits with lacy covers, which were thought to be generated at the MnS inclusions, were generated. In the sensitized specimen, pits with streaks similar to intergranular corrosion were


observed. The corrosion was also thought to be initiated at MnS inclusions because S and Mn signals were detected near the corroded areas. Because the streaks were generated only for the


sensitized specimen, they were attributed to intergranular corrosion due to Cr depletion. CORRELATION OF PITTING AT MNS AND INTERGRANULAR CORROSION On the sensitized specimen, a small area


with MnS at a grain boundary was fabricated (electrode area: ~100 μm × 100 μm), and potentiodynamic polarization was performed in 1 M NaCl (pH 5.4). In this study, the corrosion morphology


was classified into three types: Specimens I–III. Figure 5a shows the micro-scale anodic polarization curves of Specimens I–III, and Fig. 5b–j shows the electrode surfaces of these


specimens. Figure 5b–d shows composite images of the MnS inclusions and sensitized grain boundaries before preparation of the electrode areas. The black-and-white images of the MnS


inclusions on the as-polished surfaces were inverted and superimposed on the OM images after electrolytic etching. These composite images indicate that MnS was located at the sensitized


grain boundaries. Figure 5e–j shows the electrode areas before and after polarization, respectively. One or two MnS inclusions with a length of ~20 μm were included in the electrode area,


and corrosion occurred at the inclusions. As shown in Fig. 5a, above 0.1 V, the anodic current gradually increased with the electrode potential. Unlike the macro-scale polarization


(electrode area: 1 cm × 1 cm) shown in Fig. 4a, the number of current oscillations decreased considerably, and the potential region where the oscillations occurred increased to higher than


0.25 V. Moreover, a further increase in current was observed in the potential range of 0.25–0.4 V. This increase in current was attributed to the anodic dissolution of MnS


inclusions6,33,40,41,42,43. Many dissolution mechanisms have been proposed for MnS1,2,3,4,5. As one of them, Lott and Alkire4 proposed the following series of reactions during anodic


polarization of MnS. $$2{\rm{MnS}}+3{{\rm{H}}}_{2}{\rm{O}}\to 2{\rm{M}}{{\rm{n}}}^{2+}+{{\rm{S}}}_{2}{{{\rm{O}}}_{3}}^{2-}+{8{\rm{H}}}^{+}+{8{\rm{e}}}^{-}$$ (1)


$${\rm{MnS}}+{2{\rm{H}}}^{+}\to {{\rm{Mn}}}^{2+}+{\rm{S}}+{{\rm{H}}}_{2}$$ (2) In this MnS dissolution potential range, trenching is known to occur at the MnS/steel boundaries, and pits are


reported to be initiated in the trenches6,31,43. For Specimens I and II, a large current increase was observed around 0.35 V, suggesting the initiation of pitting corrosion. After anodic


polarization, localized corrosion was confirmed at MnS, as shown in Fig. 5h, i. In Specimen III, current oscillations were observed three times ~0.35 V. However, no further large increase in


current indicative of stable pitting was observed. At ~0.4 V, the anodic current decreased. As shown in Fig. 5j, the extent of corrosion damage around the MnS inclusions was relatively low


compared to Specimens I and II. Figure 5k shows an SEM image of the corrosion on Specimen I. In this image, a pit initiated at the MnS inclusion. Moreover, streaks resembling intergranular


corrosion were observed on the upper and lower sides of the inclusion. The positions of these streaks were consistent with those of the sensitized grain boundaries (Fig. 5b). Therefore,


these streaks were concluded to be intergranular corrosion owing to the dissolution of Cr-depleted regions. In Specimen II (Fig. 5l), only one pit was observed at the MnS inclusion. In this


case, no intergranular corrosion was initiated. In Specimen III, only the dissolution of the MnS/steel boundary was observed. There are several mechanisms as to the reason for trench


formation6,42,44,45, but we believe that the synergistic effect of chloride ions and elemental sulfur generated from MnS causes depassivation of the steel matrix around MnS and the formation


of trenches6. The positions indicated by the white arrows in Fig. 5m were relatively heavily corroded. These were thought to correspond to metastable pits; however, these pits were not


located at the grain boundary. In the pitting corrosion at MnS inclusions, it has been demonstrated that a trench is first formed at the MnS/steel boundary, and pits are subsequently


generated inside the trench6,31,43. In this study, no intergranular corrosion was found to occur from the trench, even when MnS was present in Cr-depleted regions. In situ OM images of the


electrode area of Specimen I are shown in Fig. 6a–m. These images were obtained from the video recording during anodic polarization shown in Fig. 5a. Figure 6a presents the surface at the


open-circuit potential (OCP) before polarization. After the start of polarization until the potential reached 0.19 V, almost no change in color was observed at the inclusion, as shown in


Fig. 6b. Above ~0.25 V, a part of the MnS inclusion turned white, as indicated by the arrow shown in Fig. 6c. This whitening may indicate dissolution of MnS. Figure 6d shows the image taken


immediately before the initiation of pitting; the time of this image was defined as 0 s. The current density at this time was 0.61 A m−2‍. In Fig. 6d–g, the inset images are enlarged views


of the areas surrounded by white lines in each figure. The yellow dashed lines in the insets are drawn at the same position as the guide to the MnS/steel boundary. At 0.16 s, the current


density increased to 5.0 A m−2. However, no changes were observed in or around the inclusion. HhAt 0.5 s, the current density further increased by approximately one order of magnitude to 90 


A m−2, and a small dark area appeared at the MnS/steel boundary, as indicated by the black thick arrow in Fig. 6f. This area was thought to be the mouth of the stable pit, based on a


comparison of this image and Fig. 5k. At 0.66 s, as seen in the inset of Fig. 6g, the dark area extended to the right along the MnS/steel boundary. This suggests that the pit expanded to the


right. After 1.0 s, intergranular corrosion was initiated and grew with time, as shown in Fig. 6h–m. Figure 6n shows an SEM image of the cross-section of Specimen I. The location of the


cross-section is shown in Figs. 5k and 6m. MnS dropped out during fabrication of the cross-section. Moreover, a cavity (pit) appeared under the MnS. A part of the pit appeared in the


cross-section as a hole, indicating that the pit was in contact with the Cr-depleted region. The hole appeared to be far from the initiation site of pitting, but this was likely due to the


dissolution of the steel matrix beneath the inclusion and the wide spreading of the stable pit37. Based on the results thus far, it is considered that pitting corrosion initially occurred at


MnS, and then intergranular corrosion was initiated when the corrosion reached a Cr-depleted region along the sensitized grain boundary. DEPASSIVATION OF THE SENSITIZED AND SOLUTION-TREATED


SPECIMENS Figure 7a shows the change in OCP with decreasing pH for the sensitized and solution-treated specimens in 1 M NaCl. The initial pH of the solution was 5.4, and the pH was


decreased stepwise using HCl. The large drop in the OCP to ~−0.4 V was due to depassivation, and the depassivation pHs of the sensitized and solution-treated specimens were 2 and 1,


respectively. After the measurements, discoloration was observed around the MnS inclusions in both specimens as shown in Fig. 7b, c. The depassivation pH of the sensitized specimen was


higher than that of the solution-treated specimen. This may be due to Cr depletion along the sensitized grain boundaries; however, MnS is likely to affect depassivation because discoloration


was observed around the MnS inclusions. To ascertain the effect of MnS on the depassivation at sensitized grain boundaries, a small area without MnS was fabricated on the sensitized


specimen, and OCP measurements were performed in 1 M NaCl at pH 1.0. Figure 8a shows the time variation of the OCP, and Fig. 8b, c shows the electrode areas before and after the


measurements, respectively. ‍As seen in Fig. 8b, c, no MnS inclusions were present in the electrode area, and no corrosion was generated after the measurements. The pH of this solution was


sufficiently low to observe depassivation because the depassivation pH of the sensitized specimen was determined to be 2, as shown in Fig. 7a. However, no large drop in the OCP to around


−0.4 V was observed, indicating that no depassivation occurred. After the OCP measurements, the masking around the electrode area was stripped, and electrolytic etching was performed in 10


mass% oxalic acid at 1 × 104 A m−2. Figure 8d, e shows the surface appearance of the electrode area after etching for 12 s and 90 s, respectively. Sensitized grain boundaries (Cr-depleted


regions) were observed. Thus, it was expected that MnS was responsible for the depassivation of the sensitized specimen. To analyze the effect of MnS inclusions on the depassivation of


sensitized re-sulfurized Type 304 stainless steel, a small area with MnS at a sensitized grain boundary was immersed in 1 M NaCl at pH 1.0. Figure 9a shows the temporal variation of the OCP


during immersion. Immediately after immersion, the OCP was ~0.21 V and became ~0.1 V from 7 to 13 s. At 14 s, the OCP further decreased and then stabilized at −0.4 V. Figure 9b shows an SEM


image of the electrode area after immersion. Figure 9c shows an SEM image of the area surrounded by the yellow lines in Fig. 9b and the corresponding EDS maps of Mn and S. As shown in Fig.


9b, a grain boundary was present from the upper right to the lower left of the inclusion. In addition, Mn and S signals were not detected (Fig. 9c). Thus, an MnS inclusion located at the


sensitized grain boundary was present in the electrode area, and MnS completely dissolved during immersion. Figure 9d–o shows in ‍situ observation images of the electrode area. Enlarged


images of the area surrounded by the dashed lines shown in Fig. 9d–i are given in Fig. 9p–u. Figure 9d shows the surface immediately after immersion, which is defined as 0 s. At 17 s, a


color change was observed in the MnS inclusion, implying that the surface of the MnS inclusion began to dissolve. In contrast, the grain boundaries and steel matrix did not dissolve during


the initial stage of immersion because no color change was observed (Fig. 9e, q). After 18 s, a black streak appeared around the MnS inclusion at the position indicated by the black arrow in


Fig. 9r. Because the location of the black streak corresponded to the grain boundary, it was determined to be intergranular corrosion owing to the dissolution of the Cr-depleted region.


From 18 s to 21 ‍s, the black streak lengthened, and another black streak was generated at the position indicated by the red arrow in Fig. 9s. At 22 s, the color of the steel matrix around


the MnS inclusion began to change to brown, suggesting the beginning of the dissolution of the steel matrix. Subsequently, the discoloration around the inclusion expanded over time and


spread to the entire electrode surface, as shown in Fig. 9j–o. This discoloration was attributed to the dissolution of the steel matrix. The in situ observations suggested that the MnS


inclusion dissolved as the first step in the depassivation of the sensitized specimen. The second step was the dissolution of the Cr-depleted regions (i.e., the sensitized grain boundaries).


Finally, dissolution of the steel matrix was determined to occur from the MnS and spread concentrically over the entire electrode surface. Comparing Fig. 9a, d–o reveals that when the MnS


inclusion began to dissolve, the OCP changed from 0.21 to −0.03 V (Fig. 9d, e). Then, from 18 to 21 s, dissolution of the grain boundaries occurred, and the OCP decreased to −0.16‍ ‍V (Fig.


9f–h). After 22 s, the steel matrix began to corrode, and the OCP further decreased to −0.4 V (Fig. 9j). The OCP value of approximately −0.4 V was determined to be the onset of corrosion of


the steel matrix. Comparison of the potential signal and corrosion behavior of the electrode surface reveals that the discoloration originating from the MnS inclusion was depassivation.


DISCUSSION In the micro-scale polarization of the sensitized specimen shown in Fig. 5, the corrosion morphology at MnS was classified into three types: (1) pitting with intergranular


corrosion (Specimen I), (2) pitting without intergranular corrosion (Specimen II), and (3) trenching without intergranular corrosion (Specimen III). First, we considered the causes of these


three appearances. As shown in Fig. 6 (Specimen I), pitting corrosion initially occurred at MnS during potentiodynamic polarization in 1 M NaCl (pH 5.4), and then intergranular corrosion was


thought to be generated when the pit reached a Cr-depleted region. Acidification generally occurs inside pits‍46,47,48,49,50. Therefore, the intergranular corrosion of Specimen I is thought


to have been introduced through the depassivation of Cr-depleted regions by an acidic solution inside the pit. Even if pitting corrosion was generated at MnS, it was concluded that pitting


corrosion did not result in intergranular corrosion when the pit location was distant from the sensitized grain boundaries, as in Specimen II. Moreover, even when MnS at a sensitized grain


boundary dissolved and trenching occurred around the MnS, similar to Specimen III, no intergranular corrosion was generated from the trench. These results indicate that severe acidification,


such as inside the pits, is essential to dissolve the Cr-depleted regions. Ida et al. 25. demonstrated that the depassivation pH of a sensitized Type 304 stainless steel (S: 0.0026 mass%)


was approximately 1. Thus, the pH of the solution in the pit causing intergranular corrosion is thought to be less than 1, whereas the solution in the trench around MnS is expected to be


above pH 1. Based on the above mechanism and the results shown in Figs. 5 and 6, at near-neutral pH, no intergranular corrosion is expected to occur directly from the Cr-depleted regions


without MnS. In fact, it has been reported that neither pitting nor intergranular corrosion occurred at a single sensitized grain boundary without MnS in Type 304 stainless steel in 0.1 M


NaCl (pH 5.4)25. This indicates that sensitization does not lower the corrosion resistance of stainless steels in NaCl solutions at near-neutral pH. However, as shown in Fig. 4a, the pitting


potential decreases after sensitization. This can be explained by the possible overlap of MnS and Cr-depleted regions as follows. In stainless steels, MnS inclusions are randomly dispersed.


The probability of pitting corrosion generated at the intersection of a sensitized grain boundary and an MnS inclusion is thus low; however, such a situation is thought to exist in


macro-scale electrodes of sizes such as 1 cm × 1 cm. When a metastable pit occurs at MnS in Cr-depleted regions, the metastable pit is likely to readily become a stable pit because of the


low Cr concentration and the difficulty of repassivation. MnS inclusions have various shapes; the part of MnS responsible for pitting corrosion depends on its morphology, particularly its


extent in the depth direction51. The overlap between the Cr-depleted region and the deep part of MnS is thought to decrease the critical potential for the transformation from metastable to


stable pitting, resulting in a decrease in the pitting potential. It can be concluded that the pitting corrosion resistance of sensitized stainless steels is not determined by the existence


of Cr depletion alone, but by the existence of MnS in the Cr-depleted regions. Next, we discuss the results of the micro-scale experiments on the roles of MnS and Cr depletion in


depassivation of sensitized steel. As shown in Fig. 9, MnS dissolution occurred as the first step in the depassivation of the sensitized specimen in 1 ‍M NaCl at pH 1.0. The second step was


dissolution of the sensitized grain boundary. Finally, corrosion (dissolution) of the steel matrix occurred. Moreover, even for the sensitized specimen, neither intergranular corrosion nor


depassivation occurred in 1 M NaCl at pH 1.0 on the electrode area without MnS (Fig. 8). In other words, we can speculate that the dissolution of MnS must occur for intergranular corrosion


and depassivation. Chiba et al. demonstrated that elemental sulfur is deposited on and around MnS inclusions via MnS dissolution6. They also reported that active dissolution of Type 304


stainless steel occurred in solutions containing both elemental sulfur and chloride ions, even at pH 3.5. Sulfur deposition on steel surfaces is likely to accelerate depassivation6.


Additionally, H2S, HSO3−, and S2O32− may be formed through MnS dissolution1,2,3,4,5,6, and these species are also thought to contribute to the depassivation of stainless steels. The


dissolution species of MnS are expected to lead to the dissolution of Cr-depleted regions, resulting in intergranular corrosion. Under open-circuit conditions in 1 M NaCl at pH 1, unlike the


anodic polarization in 1 M NaCl (pH 5.4), H2S released from MnS may be deeply involved in the depassivation because of its low potential52,53. Regarding the corrosion with discoloration


spreading over the entire electrode surface in the final stage of Fig. 9, it is likely that MnS dissolution species are involved in depassivation of the steel matrix because the


discoloration expands in a circular pattern centered on the inclusion. Therefore, it can be concluded that the dissolved species of MnS first cause depassivation of the grain boundaries with


low Cr concentrations (Cr-depleted regions), and then cause depassivation of the intragranular regions with high Cr concentrations. As seen in Fig. 5m, during potentiodynamic polarization


in 1 M NaCl at pH 5.4, intergranular corrosion (depassivation of the sensitized grain boundary) was not caused by MnS dissolution alone. This appears to be due to the high pH of the


solution. As shown in Fig. 7a, depassivation of the sensitized specimen occurred at pH 2; therefore, acidification around pH 2 is thought to be required for depassivation of the Cr-depleted


regions by the dissolution species of MnS. In the macro-scale experiments shown in Fig. 7a, depassivation occurred on the solution-treated specimens even at pH 1. This may be because a


larger electrode surface increases the probability of the existence of larger and deeper MnS inclusions, where the concentration of dissolved species is likely to be higher. At these points,


depassivation may occur even on the solution-treated specimens. In this work, the intergranular corrosion and depassivation of sensitized re-sulfurized Type 304 stainless steel were studied


in 1 M NaCl at pH 5.4 and 1.0, respectively. The following conclusions were drawn: 1. During potentiodynamic polarization in 1 M NaCl (pH 5.4), intergranular corrosion of the sensitized


Type 304 stainless steel occurred after pit initiation at an MnS inclusion. Intergranular corrosion was determined to occur when the pitting corrosion reached a Cr-depleted region along the


sensitized grain boundaries. 2. The pitting corrosion resistance of the sensitized Type 304 stainless steel was not determined by the existence of Cr depletion alone but by the existence of


MnS in the Cr-depleted regions. 3. In the depassivation of sensitized re-sulfurized Type 304 stainless steel in 1 M NaCl at pH 1.0 under open-circuit conditions, the dissolution of MnS


inclusions occurred as the first step. The second step was intergranular corrosion owing to the dissolution of Cr-depleted regions. Finally, depassivation of the intragranular regions


occurred. 4. Even on the sensitized specimen, neither intergranular corrosion nor depassivation occurred in 1 M NaCl at pH 1.0 on the small electrode area without MnS. The dissolved species


of MnS were determined to cause depassivation of the sensitized grain boundaries and intragranular regions. METHODS SPECIMENS AND ELECTROLYTES A re-sulfurized Type 304 stainless steel was


used as the specimen; the chemical composition is listed in Table 1. The concentration of S was 0.0215 mass%, which is close to the upper limit for Type 304 stainless steel (0.030 mass%).


For the solution treatment, the steel was heat-treated at 1373 K for 0.5 h and quenched in water. After solution treatment, the steel was sensitized by heating at 923 K for 20 h and


quenching in water. For the steel used in this study, not all grain boundaries were sensitized by the commonly used 2 h heat treatment; therefore, sensitization was performed for 20 h. After


heat treatment, the steel was cut into small specimens (20 × 25 × 2 mm). Before the electrochemical measurements, the specimens were mechanically ground using SiC paper through 1500 grit,


polished using a 1 μm diamond paste, and finally degreased with ethanol. As electrolytes, 1 M NaCl (pH 5.4, unadjusted) and 1 M NaCl (pH 1.0, adjusted with HCl) were used for the


electrochemical measurements. All solutions were prepared using deionized water and analytical-grade chemicals. ELECTROCHEMICAL MEASUREMENTS Potentiodynamic polarization was conducted in 1 M


NaCl (pH 5.4, unadjusted). The scan rate was 23 mV min−1. To ascertain the depassivation behavior, the time variation of the OCP was monitored in 1 M NaCl (pH 1.0, adjusted with HCl). In


addition, the pH was lowered stepwise using HCl, and the depassivation pH in 1 M NaCl was determined from the change in the OCP. All electrochemical measurements were performed at 298 K


under naturally aerated conditions, and the working electrode area was ~1 × 1 cm or 100 × 100 μm. For the former macro-scale measurements, the electrodes were sealed with epoxy resin and


paraffin. In the latter micro-scale measurements, the electrode areas were fabricated using a coating method, and real-time in situ observations of the electrode area were performed using an


optical microscope equipped with a water-immersion objective lens (×100 magnification). Details of the micro-electrochemical system used in this study can be found elsewhere37. The working


electrode areas were precisely measured after polarization, and the current values were converted to current densities. All of the potentials cited herein are expressed in terms of the


Ag/AgCl (3.33 M KCl) electrode (0.206 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode at 298 K). In this study, a small area containing MnS located at a sensitized grain boundary was fabricated. To


choose an MnS inclusion located at a sensitized grain boundary, electrolytic etching in 10 mass% oxalic acid was first conducted at a current density of 1 × 104 A m−2 for 20 s, and


indentations were formed to mark the position of sensitized grain boundaries. The specimen surface was then polished again using diamond paste. Subsequently, one MnS inclusion located at a


sensitized grain boundary was selected as the target, and the working electrode area was fabricated. Because the MnS inclusions were darker gray than the steel matrix, they were clearly


visible in the as-polished condition without etching. MICROSTRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION Before and after the electrochemical measurements, the electrode areas were imaged using OM, and the


corrosion morphology and elemental distribution at and around the corrosion initiation sites were analyzed using field-emission SEM coupled with EDS. The acceleration voltage for the SEM/EDS


analysis was 20 kV. When necessary, cross-sections of the corrosion sites were fabricated using a FIB system: a targeted area was milled with a Ga ion beam. STEM coupled with EDS was used


to observe and analyze the sensitized grain boundaries. The accelerating voltage was 200 kV. The probe size was _ca_. 1 nm. The specimens for STEM observations were prepared using a FIB


system and lifted out using a manipulator. Before the STEM specimen preparation, the steel surface was electrolytically etched in 10 mass% oxalic acid at 1 × 104 A m−2 for 90 s and indented


to mark the positions of the etched grain boundaries. The steel surface was then polished, and the STEM specimen was obtained from the sensitized grain boundary. DATA AVAILABILITY The


datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. REFERENCES * Eklund, G. S. Initiation of pitting at sulfide


inclusions in stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 121, 467–473 (1974). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Castle, J. E. & Ke, R. Studies by Auger spectroscopy of pit initiation at the


site of inclusions in stainless steel. _Corros. Sci._ 30, 409–428 (1990). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wranglén, G. Pitting and sulphide inclusions in steel. _Corros. Sci._ 14, 331–349


(1974). Article  Google Scholar  * Lott, S. E. & Alkire, R. C. The role of inclusions on initiation of crevice corrosion of stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 136, 973–979 (1989).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Webb, E. G. & Alkire, R. C. Pit initiation at single sulfide inclusions in stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 149, B280–B285 (2002). Article  CAS 


Google Scholar  * Chiba, A., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. Pit initiation mechanism at MnS inclusions in stainless steel: synergistic effect of elemental sulfur and chloride ions.


_J. Electrochem. Soc._ 160, C511–C520 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Amatsuka, S. et al. Micro-electrochemical insights into pit initiation site on aged UNS S32750 super duplex


stainless steel. _npj Mater. Degrad._ 7, 15 (2023). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Altamirano, P. M., Kappes, M. A. & Rodríguez, M. A. Effect of some environmental and stainless steel


metallurgical variables on the values of degree of sensitization measured by the double loop-electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test. _Corrosion_ 78, 1067–1078 (2022). Article 


Google Scholar  * Srinivasan, N. Sensitization of austenitic stainless steels: current developments, trends, and future directions. _Metallogr. Microstruct. Anal._ 10, 133–147 (2021).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tarasov, S. Y. et al. Microstructural evolution and chemical corrosion of electron beam wire-feed additively manufactured AISI 304 stainless steel. _J. Alloys


Compd._ 803, 364–370 (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sathirachinda, N., Pettersson, R. & Pan, J. Depletion effects at phase boundaries in 2205 duplex stainless steel


characterized with SKPFM and TEM/EDS. _Corros. Sci._ 51, 1850–1860 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Wang, K. et al. On the pitting behaviour of laser powder bed fusion prepared 316L


stainless steel upon post-processing heat treatments. _Corros. Sci._ 197, 110060 (2022). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * He, L., Wirian, L. & Singh, P. M. Effects of isothermal aging on


the microstructure evolution and pitting corrosion resistance of lean duplex stainless steel UNS S32003. _Metall. Mater. Trans. A_ 50, 2103–2113 (2019). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Sun,


J., Tang, H., Wang, C., Han, Z. & Li, S. Effects of alloying elements and microstructure on stainless steel corrosion: a review. _Steel Res. Int._ 93, 2100450 (2022). Article  CAS 


Google Scholar  * Silva, R. et al. A comprehensive study of the pitting corrosion mechanism of lean duplex stainless steel grade 2404 aged at 475 °C. _Corros. Sci._ 191, 109738 (2021).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Silva, R. et al. New insights into the hardening and pitting corrosion mechanisms of thermally aged duplex stainless steel at 475 °C: A comparative study


between 2205 and 2101 steels. _J. Mater. Sci. Technol._ 98, 123–135 (2022). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Vukkum, V. B. & Gupta, R. K. Review on corrosion performance of laser


powder-bed fusion printed 316L stainless steel: effect of processing parameters, manufacturing defects, post-processing, feedstock, and microstructure. _Mater. Des._ 221, 110874 (2022).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Weng, F. et al. Enhanced corrosion resistance of laser aided additive manufactured CoCrNi medium entropy alloys with oxide inclusion. _Corros. Sci._ 195,


109965 (2022). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Pettersson, C. O., Boellinghaus, T. & Kannengiesser, T. Corrosion testing of welds, a review of methods. _Weld World_ 51, 79–106 (2007).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ziętala, M. et al. The microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of 316 L stainless steel fabricated using laser engineered net shaping.


_Mater. Sci. Eng. A_ 677, 1–10 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Ganesh, P. et al. Studies on pitting corrosion and sensitization in laser rapid manufactured specimens of type 316L


stainless steel. _Mater. Des._ 39, 509–521 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Charles, J., Mithieux, J.-D., Santacreu, P.-O. & Peguet, L. The ferritic stainless family: the


appropriate answer to nickel volatility? _Rev. Met. Paris_ 106, 124–139 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Crolet, J. L., Séraphin, L. & Tricot, R. Influence des teneurs en chrome,


molybdène et soufre sur la résistance à la corrosion caverneuse des aciers inoxydables. _Rev. Met. Paris_ 72, 937–948 (1975). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Mujanović, E. et al.


Depassivation and repassivation of stainless steels by stepwise pH change. _Mater. Corros._ 72, 421–433 (2021). Article  Google Scholar  * Ida, N., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N.


Local electrochemistry and in situ microscopy of pitting at sensitized grain boundary of type 304 stainless steel in NaCl solution. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 164, C779–C787 (2017). Article  CAS


  Google Scholar  * Tokuda, S., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. The role of applied stress in the anodic dissolution of sulfide inclusions and pit initiation of stainless steels.


_Corros. Sci._ 183, 109312 (2021). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Tokuda, S., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. Effect of sensitization on pitting corrosion at MnS and CrS in type 304


stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 168, 091504 (2021). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Liu, P., Zhang, Q.-H., Watanabe, Y., Shoji, T. & Cao, F.-H. A critical review of the recent


advances in inclusion-triggered localized corrosion in steel. _npj Mater. Degrad._ 6, 81 (2022). Article  Google Scholar  * Nishimoto, M., Muto, I. & Sugawara, Y. Review—understanding


and controlling the electrochemical properties of sulfide inclusions for improving the pitting corrosion resistance of stainless steels. _Mater. Trans._ 64, 2051–2058 (2023). Article  Google


Scholar  * Sun, Y. et al. Mechanisms of inclusion-induced pitting of stainless steels: a review. _J. Mater. Sci. Technol._ 168, 143–156 (2024). Article  Google Scholar  * Takayama, R.,


Nishimoto, M., Muto, I. & Sugawara, Y. Micro-electrochemical aspects of the effects of temperature on pit initiation at MnS Inclusion in type 304 stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._


169, 111501 (2022). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Nishimoto, M., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. Artificial MnS inclusions in stainless steel: fabrication by spark plasma sintering


and corrosion evaluation by microelectrochemical measurements. _ISIJ Int._ 60, 196–198 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Nishimoto, M., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. Passivity


of (Mn,Cr)S inclusions in type 304 stainless steel: the role of Cr and the critical concentration for preventing inclusion dissolution in NaCl solution. _Corros. Sci._ 176, 109060 (2020).


Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Shao, Z., Nishimoto, M., Muto, I. & Sugawara, Y. Real-time in situ observation of the corrosion process of die-cast AZ91D magnesium alloy in NaCl


solutions under galvanostatic polarization. _Corros. Sci._ 192, 109834 (2021). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Shao, Z., Nishimoto, M., Muto, I. & Sugawara, Y. Fabrication of a model


specimen for understanding micro-galvanic corrosion at the boundary of α-Mg and β-Mg17Al12. _J. Magnes. Alloys_ 11, 137–153 (2023). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kakinuma, H. et al. Change


in oxygen reduction reactivity of intermetallics: a mechanism of the difference in trenching around Al–Fe and Al–Fe–Si particles on AA1050 in NaCl. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 170, 021503


(2023). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chiba, A., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. A microelectrochemical system for in situ high-resolution optical microscopy: Morphological


characteristics of pitting at MnS inclusion in stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 159, C341–C350 (2012). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Lima, A. S., Nascimento, A. M., Abreu, H. F. G.


& de Lima-Neto, P. Sensitization evaluation of the austenitic stainless steel AISI 304L, 316L, 321 and 347. _J. Mater. Sci._ 40, 139–144 (2005). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Jeon,


S.-H., Kim, S.-T., Lee, I.-S. & Park, Y.-S. Effects of sulfur addition on pitting corrosion and machinability behavior of super duplex stainless steel containing rare earth metals: part


2. _Corros. Sci._ 52, 3537–3547 (2010). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Muto, I., Izumiyama, Y. & Hara, N. Microelectrochemical measurements of dissolution of MnS inclusions and


morphological observation of metastable and stable pitting on stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 154, C439–C444 (2007). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Suter, T., Peter, T. & Böhni,


H. Microelectrochemical investigations of MnS inclusions. _Mater. Sci. Forum_ 192-194, 25–40 (1995). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Böhni, H., Suter, T. & Schreyer, A. Micro- and


nanotechniques to study localized corrosion. _Electrochim. Acta_ 40, 1361–1368 (1995). Article  Google Scholar  * Shimahashi, N., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. Effects of corrosion


and cracking of sulfide inclusions on pit initiation in stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 161, C494–C500 (2014). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Webb, E. G. & Alkire, R. C. Pit


initiation at single sulfide inclusions in stainless steel: III. Mathematical model. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 149, B286–B295 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Ryan, M. P., Williams, D.


E., Chater, R. J., Hutton, B. M. & McPhail, D. S. Why stainless steel corrodes. _Nature_ 415, 770–774 (2002). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Suzuki, T., Yamabe, M. & Kitamura, Y.


Composition of anolyte within pit anode of austenitic stainless steels in chloride solution. _Corrosion_ 29, 18–22 (1973). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Turnbull, A. The solution


composition and electrode potential in pits, crevices and cracks. _Corros. Sci._ 23, 833–870 (1983). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Kaji, T., Sekiai, T., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara,


N. Visualization of pH and pCl distributions: initiation and propagation criteria for crevice corrosion of stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 159, C289–C297 (2012). Article  CAS  Google


Scholar  * Nishimoto, M., Ogawa, J., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. Simultaneous visualization of pH and Cl− distributions inside the crevice of stainless steel. _Corros. Sci._ 106,


298–302 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Matsumura, K., Nishimoto, M., Muto, I. & Sugawara, Y. Sudden pH and Cl− concentration changes during the crevice corrosion of type 430


stainless steel. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 169, 101506 (2022). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Suter, T., Webb, E. G., Böhni, H. & Alkire, R. C. Pit Initiation on stainless steels in 1 ‍M


NaCl with and without mechanical stress. _J. Electrochem. Soc._ 148, B174–B185 (2001). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Brossia, C. S. & Kelly, R. G. Occluded solution chemistry control


and the role of alloy sulfur on the initiation of crevice corrosion in type 304ss. _Corros. Sci._ 40, 1851–1871 (1998). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Li, G. et al. Dissolution kinetics of


the sulfide-oxide complex inclusion and resulting localized corrosion mechanism of X70 steel in deaerated acidic environment. _Corros. Sci._ 174, 108815 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar


  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI, grant numbers JP22H00254 and JP21K18804. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * Noriyuki Ida Present address:


Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2-6-1, Nagasaka, Yokosuka, 240-0196, Japan AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Materials Science, Graduate School of Engineering,


Tohoku University, 6-6-02, Aza-Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan Noriyuki Ida, Masashi Nishimoto, Izumi Muto & Yu Sugawara Authors * Noriyuki Ida View author publications


You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Masashi Nishimoto View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Izumi Muto View author


publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yu Sugawara View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS


N.I.: investigation, methodology, data curation, visualization, writing—original draft. M.N. investigation, conceptualization, methodology, data curation, visualization, writing—review, and


editing. I.M.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. Y.S.: writing—review and editing. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Masashi


Nishimoto or Izumi Muto. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with


regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0


International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the


source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative


Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by


statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit


http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Ida, N., Nishimoto, M., Muto, I. _et al._ Role of MnS in the intergranular


corrosion and depassivation of sensitized Type 304 stainless steel. _npj Mater Degrad_ 8, 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-023-00419-5 Download citation * Received: 12 October 2023 *


Accepted: 19 December 2023 * Published: 05 January 2024 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-023-00419-5 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read


this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative