Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Precise control of activating H3K4me3 and repressive H3K27me3 histone modifications at bivalent promoters is essential for normal development and frequently corrupted in cancer. By
coupling a cell surface readout of bivalent MHC class I gene expression with whole-genome CRISPR–Cas9 screens, we identify specific roles for MTF2–PRC2.1, PCGF1–PRC1.1 and Menin–KMT2A/B
complexes in maintaining bivalency. Genetic loss or pharmacological inhibition of Menin unexpectedly phenocopies the effects of polycomb disruption, resulting in derepression of bivalent
genes in both cancer cells and pluripotent stem cells. While Menin and KMT2A/B contribute to H3K4me3 at active genes, a separate Menin-independent function of KMT2A/B maintains H3K4me3 and
opposes polycomb-mediated repression at bivalent genes. Release of KMT2A from active genes following Menin targeting alters the balance of polycomb and KMT2A at bivalent genes, facilitating
gene activation. This functional partitioning of Menin–KMT2A/B complex components reveals therapeutic opportunities that can be leveraged through inhibition of Menin. Access through your
institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio
journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $29.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and online access $209.00 per
year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated
during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS PHF6
COOPERATES WITH SWI/SNF COMPLEXES TO FACILITATE TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROGRESSION Article Open access 24 August 2024 GENOMIC PROFILING OF THE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR ZFP148 AND ITS IMPACT ON THE P53
PATHWAY Article Open access 25 August 2020 BAHCC1 BINDS H3K27ME3 VIA A CONSERVED BAH MODULE TO MEDIATE GENE SILENCING AND ONCOGENESIS Article 02 November 2020 DATA AVAILABILITY ChIP–seq,
RNA-seq, CUT&Tag and CUT&RUN data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession code GSE181829. ChIP–seq data
from the hESC H9 line were used from GEO accession nos GSE96336 and GSE96353, EZH2-null H9 hESC RNAs-seq data were from GEO accession no. GSE76626 and human induced pluripotent stem cell
line iPS-20b ChIP–seq data from GEO accession nos GSM772844 and GSM772847. Source data are provided with this paper. All other data supporting the findings of this study are available from
the corresponding authors on reasonable request. REFERENCES * Kuroda, M. I., Kang, H., De, S. & Kassis, J. A. Dynamic competition of polycomb and trithorax in transcriptional
programming. _Annu. Rev. Biochem._ 89, 235–253 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Yu, J. R., Lee, C. H., Oksuz, O., Stafford, J. M. & Reinberg, D. PRC2 is
high maintenance. _Genes Dev._ 33, 903–935 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Hughes, A. L., Kelley, J. R. & Klose, R. J. Understanding the interplay between
CpG island-associated gene promoters and H3K4 methylation. _Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech._ 1863, 194567 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Cenik, B.
K. & Shilatifard, A. COMPASS and SWI/SNF complexes in development and disease. _Nat. Rev. Genet._ 22, 38–58 (2021). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Laugesen, A., Hojfeldt, J. W.
& Helin, K. Molecular mechanisms directing PRC2 recruitment and H3K27 methylation. _Mol. Cell_ 74, 8–18 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Bracken, A. P.,
Brien, G. L. & Verrijzer, C. P. Dangerous liaisons: interplay between SWI/SNF, NuRD, and polycomb in chromatin regulation and cancer. _Genes Dev._ 33, 936–959 (2019). Article CAS
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. _Cell_ 125, 315–326 (2006). Article
CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Azuara, V. et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. _Nat. Cell Biol._ 8, 532–538 (2006). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Mikkelsen, T. S.
et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. _Nature_ 448, 553–560 (2007). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Cao, R. et al.
Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in polycomb-group silencing. _Science_ 298, 1039–1043 (2002). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Margueron, R. et al. Role of the polycomb
protein EED in the propagation of repressive histone marks. _Nature_ 461, 762–767 (2009). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kuzmichev, A., Nishioka, K.,
Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P. & Reinberg, D. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. _Genes Dev._
16, 2893–2905 (2002). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Conway, E. et al. A family of vertebrate-specific polycombs encoded by the _LCOR_/_LCORL_ genes balance PRC2
subtype activities. _Mol. Cell_ 70, 408–421 (2018). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Hojfeldt, J. W. et al. Non-core subunits of the PRC2 complex are collectively required for its
target-site specificity. _Mol. Cell_ 76, 423–436 (2019). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Oksuz, O. et al. Capturing the onset of PRC2-mediated repressive domain formation. _Mol. Cell_ 70,
1149–1162 (2018). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Hauri, S. et al. A high-density map for navigating the human polycomb complexome. _Cell Rep._ 17, 583–595 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Gao, Z. et al. PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes. _Mol. Cell_ 45, 344–356 (2012). Article CAS
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Morey, L., Aloia, L., Cozzuto, L., Benitah, S. A. & Di Croce, L. RYBP and Cbx7 define specific biological functions of polycomb complexes in
mouse embryonic stem cells. _Cell Rep._ 3, 60–69 (2013). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Fursova, N. A. et al. Synergy between variant PRC1 complexes defines polycomb-mediated gene
repression. _Mol. Cell_ 74, 1020–1036 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Blackledge, N. P. et al. Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2
recruitment and polycomb domain formation. _Cell_ 157, 1445–1459 (2014). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Scelfo, A. et al. Functional landscape of PCGF proteins
reveals both RING1A/B-dependent- and RING1A/B-independent-specific activities. _Mol. Cell_ 74, 1037–1052 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Hu, D. et al. The
Mll2 branch of the COMPASS family regulates bivalent promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells. _Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol._ 20, 1093–1097 (2013). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google
Scholar * Denissov, S. et al. Mll2 is required for H3K4 trimethylation on bivalent promoters in embryonic stem cells, whereas Mll1 is redundant. _Development_ 141, 526–537 (2014). Article
CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Comet, I., Riising, E. M., Leblanc, B. & Helin, K. Maintaining cell identity: PRC2-mediated regulation of transcription and cancer. _Nat. Rev. Cancer_ 16,
803–810 (2016). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Michalak, E. M., Burr, M. L., Bannister, A. J. & Dawson, M. A. The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer.
_Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol._ 20, 573–589 (2019). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Dawson, M. A. The cancer epigenome: concepts, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities. _Science_
355, 1147–1152 (2017). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Burr, M. L. et al. An evolutionarily conserved function of polycomb silences the MHC class I antigen presentation pathway and
enables immune evasion in cancer. _Cancer Cell_ 36, 385–401 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Fan, H. et al. A conserved BAH module within mammalian BAHD1
connects H3K27me3 to polycomb gene silencing. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 49, 4441–4455 (2021). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Zhao, D. et al. The BAH domain of BAHD1 is a
histone H3K27me3 reader. _Protein Cell_ 7, 222–226 (2016). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Bierne, H. et al. Human BAHD1 promotes heterochromatic gene silencing. _Proc.
Natl Acad. Sci. USA_ 106, 13826–13831 (2009). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Boehm, J. S. et al. Cancer research needs a better map. _Nature_ 589, 514–516 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Tsherniak, A. et al. Defining a cancer dependency map. _Cell_ 170, 564–576 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar *
Grijzenhout, A. et al. Functional analysis of AEBP2, a PRC2 polycomb protein, reveals a Trithorax phenotype in embryonic development and in ESCs. _Development_ 143, 2716–2723 (2016). CAS
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Chen, S., Jiao, L., Liu, X., Yang, X. & Liu, X. A dimeric structural scaffold for PRC2–PCL targeting to CpG island chromatin. _Mol. Cell_ 77,
1265–1278 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Youmans, D. T., Gooding, A. R., Dowell, R. D. & Cech, T. R. Competition between PRC2.1 and 2.2 subcomplexes
regulates PRC2 chromatin occupancy in human stem cells. _Mol. Cell_ 81, 488–501 (2021). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Junco, S. E. et al. Structure of the polycomb group protein
PCGF1 in complex with BCOR reveals basis for binding selectivity of PCGF homologs. _Structure_ 21, 665–671 (2013). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Agarwal, S. K. et
al. Menin interacts with the AP1 transcription factor JunD and represses JunD-activated transcription. _Cell_ 96, 143–152 (1999). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Huang, J. et al. The
same pocket in menin binds both MLL and JUND but has opposite effects on transcription. _Nature_ 482, 542–546 (2012). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Yokoyama, A. et
al. The Menin tumor suppressor protein is an essential oncogenic cofactor for MLL-associated leukemogenesis. _Cell_ 123, 207–218 (2005). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Yokoyama, A.
& Cleary, M. L. Menin critically links MLL proteins with LEDGF on cancer-associated target genes. _Cancer Cell_ 14, 36–46 (2008). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar *
Borkin, D. et al. Pharmacologic inhibition of the Menin–MLL interaction blocks progression of MLL leukemia in vivo. _Cancer Cell_ 27, 589–602 (2015). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central
Google Scholar * Krivtsov, A. V. et al. A Menin–MLL inhibitor induces specific chromatin changes and eradicates disease in models of MLL-rearranged leukemia. _Cancer Cell_ 36, 660–673
(2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Chen, L. et al. CRISPR–Cas9 screen reveals a MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma dependency on EZH2. _J. Clin. Invest._ 128, 446–462
(2018). Article PubMed Google Scholar * George, J. et al. Comprehensive genomic profiles of small cell lung cancer. _Nature_ 524, 47–53 (2015). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central
Google Scholar * Sutherland, K. D. et al. Cell of origin of small cell lung cancer: inactivation of Trp53 and Rb1 in distinct cell types of adult mouse lung. _Cancer Cell_ 19, 754–764
(2011). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Mollaoglu, G. et al. MYC drives progression of small cell lung cancer to a variant neuroendocrine subtype with vulnerability to aurora kinase
inhibition. _Cancer Cell_ 31, 270–285 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * McCabe, M. T. et al. EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for lymphoma with
EZH2-activating mutations. _Nature_ 492, 108–112 (2012). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Chiappinelli, K. B. et al. Inhibiting DNA methylation causes an interferon response in cancer
via dsRNA including endogenous retroviruses. _Cell_ 162, 974–986 (2015). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Roulois, D. et al. DNA-demethylating agents target
colorectal cancer cells by inducing viral mimicry by endogenous transcripts. _Cell_ 162, 961–973 (2015). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Sheng, W. et al. LSD1
ablation stimulates anti-tumor immunity and enables checkpoint blockade. _Cell_ 174, 549–563 (2018). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Durbin, J. E., Hackenmiller, R.,
Simon, M. C. & Levy, D. E. Targeted disruption of the mouse _Stat1_ gene results in compromised innate immunity to viral disease. _Cell_ 84, 443–450 (1996). Article CAS PubMed Google
Scholar * Heppner, C. et al. The tumor suppressor protein menin interacts with NF-κB proteins and inhibits NF-κB-mediated transactivation. _Oncogene_ 20, 4917–4925 (2001). Article CAS
PubMed Google Scholar * Mas, G. et al. Promoter bivalency favors an open chromatin architecture in embryonic stem cells. _Nat. Genet._ 50, 1452–1462 (2018). Article CAS PubMed Google
Scholar * Pan, G. et al. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. _Cell Stem Cell_ 1, 299–312 (2007). Article CAS PubMed
Google Scholar * Gifford, C. A. et al. Transcriptional and epigenetic dynamics during specification of human embryonic stem cells. _Cell_ 153, 1149–1163 (2013). Article CAS PubMed PubMed
Central Google Scholar * Pasini, D., Bracken, A. P., Jensen, M. R., Lazzerini Denchi, E. & Helin, K. Suz12 is essential for mouse development and for EZH2 histone methyltransferase
activity. _EMBO J._ 23, 4061–4071 (2004). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Shen, X. et al. EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in
maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. _Mol. Cell_ 32, 491–502 (2008). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Chamberlain, S. J., Yee, D. & Magnuson,
T. Polycomb repressive complex 2 is dispensable for maintenance of embryonic stem cell pluripotency. _Stem Cells_ 26, 1496–1505 (2008). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Pasini, D.,
Bracken, A. P., Hansen, J. B., Capillo, M. & Helin, K. The polycomb group protein Suz12 is required for embryonic stem cell differentiation. _Mol. Cell. Biol._ 27, 3769–3779 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Collinson, A. et al. Deletion of the polycomb-group protein EZH2 leads to compromised self-renewal and differentiation defects in
human embryonic stem cells. _Cell Rep._ 17, 2700–2714 (2016). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Vlahos, K. et al. Generation of iPSC lines from peripheral blood
mononuclear cells from 5 healthy adults. _Stem Cell Res._ 34, 101380 (2019). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Loh, K. M. et al. Mapping the pairwise choices leading from pluripotency
to human bone, heart, and other mesoderm cell types. _Cell_ 166, 451–467 (2016). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Skelton, R. J. P., Kamp, T. J., Elliott, D. A. &
Ardehali, R. Biomarkers of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac lineages. _Trends Mol. Med._ 23, 651–668 (2017). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Brown, D. A. et al. The SET1
complex selects actively transcribed target genes via multivalent interaction with CpG island chromatin. _Cell Rep._ 20, 2313–2327 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google
Scholar * Wu, M. et al. Molecular regulation of H3K4 trimethylation by Wdr82, a component of human Set1/COMPASS. _Mol. Cell. Biol._ 28, 7337–7344 (2008). Article CAS PubMed PubMed
Central Google Scholar * Stafford, J. M. et al. Multiple modes of PRC2 inhibition elicit global chromatin alterations in H3K27M pediatric glioma. _Sci. Adv._ 4, eaau5935 (2018). Article
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Harutyunyan, A. S. et al. H3K27M induces defective chromatin spread of PRC2-mediated repressive H3K27me2/me3 and is essential for glioma
tumorigenesis. _Nat. Commun._ 10, 1262 (2019). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kobayashi, K. S. & van den Elsen, P. J. NLRC5: a key regulator of MHC class I-dependent
immune responses. _Nat. Rev. Immunol._ 12, 813–820 (2012). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Farcas, A. M. et al. KDM2B links the polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) to recognition of
CpG islands. _eLife_ 1, e00205 (2012). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Wu, X., Johansen, J. V. & Helin, K. Fbxl10/Kdm2b recruits polycomb repressive complex 1 to CpG
islands and regulates H2A ubiquitylation. _Mol. Cell_ 49, 1134–1146 (2013). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Li, H. et al. Polycomb-like proteins link the PRC2 complex to CpG islands.
_Nature_ 549, 287–291 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Hojfeldt, J. W. et al. Accurate H3K27 methylation can be established de novo by SUZ12-directed PRC2.
_Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol._ 25, 225–232 (2018). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Perino, M. et al. MTF2 recruits polycomb repressive complex 2 by helical-shape-selective DNA
binding. _Nat. Genet._ 50, 1002–1010 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Tamburri, S. et al. Histone H2AK119 mono-ubiquitination is essential for polycomb-mediated transcriptional
repression. _Mol. Cell_ 77, 840–856 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Blackledge, N. P. et al. PRC1 catalytic activity is central to polycomb system function.
_Mol. Cell_ 77, 857–874 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Hu, D. et al. Not all H3K4 methylations are created equal: Mll2/COMPASS dependency in primordial germ
cell specification. _Mol. Cell_ 65, 460–475 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * van Nuland, R. et al. Quantitative dissection and stoichiometry determination of
the human SET1/MLL histone methyltransferase complexes. _Mol. Cell. Biol._ 33, 2067–2077 (2013). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Chen, Y. et al. Distinct pathways affected
by menin versus MLL1/MLL2 in MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia. _Exp. Hematol._ 69, 37–42 (2019). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Xu, J. et al. MLL1 and MLL1 fusion proteins
have distinct functions in regulating leukemic transcription program. _Cell Discov._ 2, 16008 (2016). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Mendenhall, E. M. et al. GC-rich
sequence elements recruit PRC2 in mammalian ES cells. _PLoS Genet._ 6, e1001244 (2010). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Thomson, J. P. et al. CpG islands influence
chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1. _Nature_ 464, 1082–1086 (2010). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Singh, A. M. et al. Cell-cycle control of
bivalent epigenetic domains regulates the exit from pluripotency. _Stem Cell Rep._ 5, 323–336 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * Konig, R. et al. A probability-based approach for the
analysis of large-scale RNAi screens. _Nat. Methods_ 4, 847–849 (2007). Article PubMed Google Scholar * Zhang, J. et al. An integrative ENCODE resource for cancer genomics. _Nat. Commun._
11, 3696 (2020). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Hughes, C. M. et al. Menin associates with a trithorax family histone methyltransferase complex and with the hoxc8
locus. _Mol. Cell_ 13, 587–597 (2004). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Lewis, P. W. et al. Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric
glioblastoma. _Science_ 340, 857–861 (2013). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Diebold, S. S., Cotten, M., Koch, N. & Zenke, M. MHC class II presentation of
endogenously expressed antigens by transfected dendritic cells. _Gene Ther._ 8, 487–493 (2001). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Morgens, D. W. et al. Genome-scale measurement of
off-target activity using Cas9 toxicity in high-throughput screens. _Nat. Commun._ 8, 15178 (2017). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Martin, M. CUTADAPT removes
adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. _EMBnet.journal_ https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200 (2011). * Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with
Bowtie 2. _Nat. Methods_ 9, 357–359 (2012). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Koike-Yusa, H., Li, Y., Tan, E. P., Velasco-Herrera Mdel, C. & Yusa, K. Genome-wide
recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 32, 267–273 (2014). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Aubrey, B. J. et al.
An inducible lentiviral guide RNA platform enables the identification of tumor-essential genes and tumor-promoting mutations in vivo. _Cell Rep._ 10, 1422–1432 (2015). Article CAS PubMed
Google Scholar * Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 37,
907–915 (2019). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.
_Bioinformatics_ 31, 166–169 (2015). Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar * Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with
DESeq2. _Genome Biol._ 15, 550 (2014). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient epigenomic profiling of small samples and single
cells. _Nat. Commun._ 10, 1930 (2019). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory
variation. _Nature_ 523, 486–490 (2015). Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Skene, P. J. & Henikoff, S. An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution
mapping of DNA binding sites. _eLife_ 6, e21856 (2017). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM.
Preprint at _arXiv_ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1303.3997 (2013). * Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP–Seq (MACS). _Genome Biol._ 9, R137 (2008). Article PubMed PubMed
Central Google Scholar * Ramírez, F., Dündar, F., Diehl, S., Grüning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 42,
W187–W191 (2014). Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar * Kurtenbach, S. & William Harbour, J. SparK: a Publication-quality NGS visualization tool. Preprint at _bioRxiv_
https://doi.org/10.1101/845529 (2019). Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Molecular Genomics Core and the flow cytometry facility. We thank the
following funders for fellowship, scholarship and grant support: Snow Medical Research Foundation Fellowship (M.L.B. and M.E.-M.), Cancer Research UK Clinician Scientist Fellowship
C53779/A20097 and NHMRC Investigator Grant 1196598 (M.L.B.), Sir Edward Dunlop Fellowship, Cancer Council of Victoria, NHMRC Investigator Grant 1196749 and Howard Hughes Medical Institute
International Research Scholarship 55008729 (M.A.D.), CSL Centenary Fellowship and NHMRC Investigator Grant 1196755 (S.-J.D.), Peter and Julie Alston Centenary fellowship (K.D.S.), Wellcome
Trust Principal Research Fellowship 101835/Z/13/Z (P.J.L.), Peter MacCallum Postgraduate Scholarship (C.E.S.), NHMRC Postgraduate Scholarship (K.L.C.), Maddie Riewoldt’s Vision 064728
(Y.-C.C.), Victorian Cancer Agency (E.Y.N.L.), VCA Mid-Career Fellowship MCRF19033 (D.J.G.), CSL Centenary Fellowship (S.-J.D.) and NHMRC grants 1164054 and 2010275 (M.L.B.), 1085015 and
1106444 (M.A.D.), and 1128984 (M.A.D. and S.-J.D.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. Schematics in
Fig. 1a,d, Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 10a were created with BioRender.com. AUTHOR INFORMATION Author notes * These authors contributed equally: Marian L. Burr, Mark A. Dawson. AUTHORS
AND AFFILIATIONS * Cancer Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Christina E. Sparbier, Andrea Gillespie, Juliana Gomez, Nishi Kumari, Ali
Motazedian, Kah Lok Chan, Charles C. Bell, Omer Gilan, Yih-Chih Chan, Melanie A. Eckersley-Maslin, Sarah-Jane Dawson, Enid Y. N. Lam, Marian L. Burr & Mark A. Dawson * Sir Peter
MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Christina E. Sparbier, Ali Motazedian, Kah Lok Chan, Charles C. Bell, Yih-Chih Chan, Melanie A.
Eckersley-Maslin, Sarah-Jane Dawson, Enid Y. N. Lam, Marian L. Burr & Mark A. Dawson * The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra,
Australian Capital Territory, Australia Juliana Gomez, Sarah Popp & Marian L. Burr * Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital,
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Kah Lok Chan & Mark A. Dawson * Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Omer Gilan * Department of
Molecular Translational Science, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Daniel J. Gough * Centre for Cancer Research, Hudson
Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia Daniel J. Gough * Department of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Melanie A.
Eckersley-Maslin * Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Sarah-Jane Dawson & Mark A. Dawson * Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology
and Infectious Disease, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK Paul J. Lehner * ACRF Cancer Biology and Stem Cells Division, Walter and Eliza Hall
Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Kate D. Sutherland * Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Kate D.
Sutherland * Section of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA Patricia Ernst *
Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA Patricia Ernst * Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Waltham, MA, USA Gerard M. McGeehan * Department of Anatomical
Pathology, ACT Pathology, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Marian L. Burr Authors * Christina E. Sparbier View author publications You can also
search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Andrea Gillespie View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Juliana Gomez View author
publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Nishi Kumari View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ali Motazedian
View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Kah Lok Chan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *
Charles C. Bell View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Omer Gilan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google
Scholar * Yih-Chih Chan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Sarah Popp View author publications You can also search for this author
inPubMed Google Scholar * Daniel J. Gough View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Melanie A. Eckersley-Maslin View author publications You can
also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Sarah-Jane Dawson View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Paul J. Lehner View author
publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Kate D. Sutherland View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Patricia
Ernst View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Gerard M. McGeehan View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google
Scholar * Enid Y. N. Lam View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Marian L. Burr View author publications You can also search for this author
inPubMed Google Scholar * Mark A. Dawson View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS M.L.B. and M.A.D. conceived, designed and
supervised the research and wrote the manuscript. C.E.S. designed the research, conducted experiments, analysed data and helped write the manuscript. J.G., N.K., K.L.C., A.M., C.C.B., O.G.
and S.P. conducted experiments, analysed data and provided expertise. C.E.S. conducted the CRISPR screens. A.G. and E.Y.N.L. led the analysis of the genomic data and CRISPR screens with
contributions from Y.-C.C. K.D.S., D.J.G., M.A.E.-M., S.-J.D., P.J.L., P.E. and G.M.M. provided critical expertise and/or reagents and contributed to manuscript preparation. CORRESPONDING
AUTHORS Correspondence to Marian L. Burr or Mark A. Dawson. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS M.A.D. has been a member of advisory boards for GSK, CTX CRC, Storm Therapeutics, Celgene
and Cambridge Epigenetix. The Dawson Laboratory is a recipient of grant funding through the emerging science fund administered through Pfizer. S.J.D. has been a member of advisory boards for
Adela and Inivata. P.E. owns Amgen stocks (less than 5% value of the company) and has undertaken previous consulting for Servier (less than $10,000). G.M.M. is employed by Syndax
Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. PEER REVIEW PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature Cell Biology_ thanks Yali Dou and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for
their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. EXTENDED DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 1 MHC-I GENES HARBOUR BIVALENT H3K4ME3 AND H3K27ME3 MODIFICATIONS. A, Genomic snapshots of MHC-I
genes showing H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 CUT&Tag in K-562 and ChIP–seq in neuroblastoma KELLY cell lines. The K-562 tracks are also shown in the control cells in Fig. 2h and H3K27me3 control
cells in Fig. 6f. B,C, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 (left) and KELLY (right) cells following treatment with EPZ-011989 and (C) ± 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ (48 h K-562; 24 h KELLY). D, Genomic
snapshots of MHC-I genes showing ChIP–seq for H3K4me3, H3K27me3 and H3K27ac in KELLY cells treated with ethanol (control) or EPZ-011989 ± IFN-γ. E,F, ChIP reChIP–seq of single H3K27me3,
single H3K4me3 and reChIP (H3K27me3 and H3K4me3) in K-562 cells. E, Genomic snapshots of bivalent MHC-I genes. F, Heatmaps show bivalent genes −3 kb TSS/+3 kb TES, with genomic regions
ordered by H3K27me3 read density in the single H3K27me3 ChIP sample. B,C, Representative plots from three experiments (Supplementary Fig. 3). Source data EXTENDED DATA FIG. 2 GENOME-WIDE
CRISPR–CAS9 SCREEN IDENTIFIES REGULATORS OF MHC-I EXPRESSION. A, Cell surface MHC-I, pan-HLA-A,B,C (top)- and HLA-B (bottom)-specific antibodies in K-562 Cas9 cells treated with the
indicated IFN-γ doses for 24 h. B, K-562 cells stably expressing Cas9 were mutagenized by infection with a pooled lentiviral sgRNA library and treated with 1 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 24 h prior to
FACS sorting. Rare MHC-I high cells were enriched by two successive rounds of FACS sorting for mCherry+ (containing sgRNA vector) MHC-I+ cells. FACS dot plots and histograms show MHC-I
expression in unsorted, post sort 1 and post sort 2 in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with the CRIPSR sgRNA library and sorted with either pan-HLA-A,B,C (top)- or HLA-B (bottom)-specific
antibodies. C, Table depicting correlation between CRISPR gene-effect scores (Fig. 1e) for top-20 shared _EZH2_ and _EED_ co-dependent genes calculated from combined CRISPR survival screens
in 990 cancer cell lines in Cancer Dependency Map (https://depmap.org/portal/)31,32. Table indicates Pearson’s correlation coefficients. D,E, Immunoblots of K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with
control and _MTF2_ (D) or _AEBP2_ (E) sgRNA. F, H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 CUT&Tag. Genomic snapshots of bivalent MHC-I genes in K-562 cells transduced with control, _MTF2_ and _AEBP2_ sgRNA.
The H3K4me3 control tracks are the same control tracks in Fig. 7c. G, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with control or _BAHD1-_specific sgRNAs and treated with 10 ng ml−1
IFN-γ for 48 h. Representative plots from three experiments (Supplementary Fig. 3). H, Knockout scores of individual sgRNA targeting _BAHD1_ measured using Synthego Performance Analysis,
Interference of CRISPR editing (ICE) Analysis. Source data EXTENDED DATA FIG. 3 LOSS OF PRC1 DRIVES DEREPRESSION OF BIVALENT GENES. A, Immunoblot of K-562 Cas9, _PCGF1_-KO and _EED_-KO cells
± 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ (40 h). B,C, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with either control or _PCGF1_ sgRNA. C, Mean percentage of MHC-I expression from three experiments,
indicated by points. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s _t_-test, _P_ = 0.0295. D, qRT-PCR for MHC-I genes in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with control or _PCGF1_ sgRNA. Bars indicate mean ± s.d.
of technical triplicates from a representative experiment. E, Cell surface MHC-I in _EED_-KO cells transduced with control or _MTF2_ sgRNA. Representative plot from three experiments
(Supplementary Fig. 3). F, Immunoblot of K-562 Cas9 and _EED_-KO cells transduced with control and _PCGF1_ sgRNA. G,H, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with _RING1A_ and/or
_RING1B_ sgRNA, following treatment with 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 36 h. H, Bars show mean fold change in MFI from 3–5 experiments, indicated by points. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s _t_-test,
_P_ values are indicated. I, Immunoblot of K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with the indicated sgRNA. J, Genomic snapshots of bivalent MHC-I genes showing H3K4me3, H3K27me3 and H2AK119Ub
CUT&Tag in K-562 Cas9 (control), _EED_-KO and _PCGF1-_KO cells. The H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 control tracks are the same control tracks in Fig. 6f. K, H2AK119Ub CUT&Tag in K-562 cells
transduced with control or _MTF2_ sgRNA. Heatmaps show bivalent genes −3kb TSS/+3 kb TES. Genomic regions are ordered by H2AK119Ub read density in the control sample. Source data EXTENDED
DATA FIG. 4 DEPLETION OF MENIN OR LEDGF ENHANCES BASAL AND IFN-Γ-INDUCED BIVALENT MHC-I GENE EXPRESSION. A,B, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with control, _MEN1_ or
_PSIP1_ sgRNA. B, Bars show mean percentage of MHC-I expression from three experiments, indicated by points. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s _t_-test, significant changes are indicated, _P_ =
0.0356. C, qRT-PCR for MHC-I genes in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with control or _MEN1_ sgRNA. Bars indicate mean ± s.d. of technical triplicates from a representative experiment. D,
Immunoblot of K-562 Cas9, _MEN1_-KO and _PSIP1_-KO cells ± 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 40 h. E, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with control or the indicated sgRNA targeting
_MEN1_. F,G, Immunoblots of K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with control sgRNA or sgRNA targeting _MEN1_ (F), _MEN1-_KO cells ± _MEN1_ cDNA (G). H,I, JunD is not required for enhanced MHC-I
expression following _MEN1_ KO. K-562 Cas9 and _MEN1-_KO cells transduced with control or _JunD_ sgRNA and analysed by flow cytometry following treatment with 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 48 h (H)
and immunoblot (I). H, Representative plots from three experiments (Supplementary Fig. 3). Source data EXTENDED DATA FIG. 5 PHARMACOLOGICAL TARGETING OF MENIN–KMT2A/B AND PRC2 SIMILARLY
AUGMENT IFN-Γ-INDUCED MHC-I EXPRESSION IN MHC-ILOW CANCERS AND ENHANCE T CELL-MEDIATED KILLING. A, qRT-PCR analysis of K-562 cells treated ± 500 nM VTP50469. Bars indicate the mean ± s.d. of
technical triplicates. B, MI-503, a chemically distinct inhibitor of the Menin–MLL interaction, also enhanced IFN-γ induced MHC-I expression. Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 Cas9 cells
pre-treated with 500 nM MI-503 and 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ (48 h). Representative plot from three experiments (Supplementary Fig. 3). C, Cell surface MHC-I in cells treated with DMSO or 3 µM
EPZ-011989 and 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ (24 h SCLC, 40 h KELLY), (VTP50469 treatment: Fig. 4a). Representative plots from independent experiments (_n_ = 2 SCLC, _n_ = 3 KELLY (Supplementary Fig.
3)). D, Cell surface MHC-I expression in SCLC cells treated with DMSO, 1 µM VTP50469 or 3 µM EPZ-011989 and 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 24 h. Representative plots from two experiments
(Supplementary Fig. 3). E, Scatter plot indicating _MEN1_ and _EED_ CERES gene perturbation effects for neuroblastoma cell lines evaluated in combined CRISPR screens in DepMap (DepMap 21Q2
Public+Score, CERES (https://depmap.org/portal/)31,32. F, Flow cytometry analysis of RP-48-OVA cells pre-treated with DMSO or 1 µM VTP50469 and 10 ng ml−1 murine IFN-γ (24 h) prior to
co-culture with OVA antigen-specific OT-I T cells at the indicated effector:target (E:T) ratios. Bars indicate mean percent remaining mCherry+ (RP-48-OVA) cells compared with no T cell
control from three independent replicates, indicated by points. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s _t_-tests compared with the respective DMSO controls. Significant changes are indicated. G,
Cytometric Beads Array (CBA) assay for mIFN-γ following 24 h co-culture of RP-48-OVA cells pre-treated with DMSO or 1 µM VTP50469 and 10 ng ml−1 murine IFN-γ (24 h) prior to co-culture with
OVA antigen-specific OT-I T cells at a 2:1 (E:T) ratio. Bars show mean expression from 2–3 independent replicates, indicated by points. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s _t_-test, _P_ = 0.01. H,
Cell surface MHC-I in SPC-545-OVA cells pre-treated with DMSO, 1 µM VTP50469 and/or 3 µM EPZ-011989, and 1 ng ml−1 murine IFN-γ (24 h). Representative plot from two experiments
(Supplementary Fig. 3). I, CBA assay for mIFN-γ and TNF following 4 d of co-culture of pre-treated SPC-545-OVA cells (DMSO, 1 µM VTP50469 and/or 3 µM EPZ-011989 and 2 h 20 ng ml−1 mIFN-γ)
with OVA antigen-specific OT-I T cells at a 2:1 (E:T) ratio. Bars show mean expression from three independent replicates, indicated by points. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s _t_-test compared
with the respective DMSO + mIFN-γ controls. Significant changes are indicated. Source data EXTENDED DATA FIG. 6 TARGETING MENIN DRIVES EXPRESSION OF BIVALENT GENES INDEPENDENTLY OF IFN AND
NF-ΚB SIGNALLING. A,B, Immunoblot in K-562 _EED_-KO cells depleted of _MEN1_ and _PSIP1_ (A) or _PCGF1_ (B) and then transduced with the indicated sgRNA. C, Immunoblot in K-562 Cas9 and
_EED_-KO cells transduced with the indicated sgRNA and treated ± 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 48 h. D–H, K-562 _EED_-KO cells depleted of _MEN1_, _PSIP1_ or _PCGF1_ and transduced with the indicated
sgRNA, analysed by flow cytometry (D,F), and immunoblot (E,G,H). I, Immunoblot of K-562 Cas9 and _EED_-KO cells transduced with the indicated sgRNA and treated ± 20 ng ml−1 TNF-α for 48 h.
J, Cell surface MHC-I expression in K-562 _EED_-KO cells transduced with control or _PCGF1_ sgRNA and treated ± 25 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 24 h. D,F,J, Representative plots from three experiments
(Supplementary Fig. 3). Source data EXTENDED DATA FIG. 7 LOSS OF MENIN ALLEVIATES REPRESSION OF BIVALENT GENES. A, Volcano plot showing log2FC gene expression from RNA-seq data in K-562
cells expressing _MEN1_ sgRNA compared with control sgRNA. Selected MHC class I genes are labelled. Two-sided Wald test; _P_ values adjusted for multiple testing. B, Venn diagram depicting
overlap in genes downregulated (_P_adj < 0.05 and fold change > 2) after CRISPR deletion of _MEN1_, _PSIP1_ or _EED_. C, Venn diagrams depicting overlap in genes up- and downregulated
(_P_adj < 0.05 and fold change > 2) after CRISPR deletion of _MEN1_ or _PSIP1_, or 500 nM VTP50469 treatment. D, Pharmacological inhibition of Menin–KMT2A/B induces genome-wide
displacement of Menin from chromatin. Menin ChIP–seq in K-562 cells treated for 48 h with DMSO or 1 µM VTP50469. Average profile plots (top) and heatmaps (bottom) of Menin-occupied sites
−3kb TSS/+3 kb TES. Genomic regions are ordered by Menin occupancy in the control sample. E,F, Immunoblots of K-562 Cas9 (control), _MEN1_-KO, _PSIP1_-KO and _PCGF1-_KO cells. G, Genomic
snapshots of MHC-I genes from SUZ12 ChIP–seq data in K-562 Cas9 control and _MEN1_-KO cells. H, Genomic snapshots of H3K4me3, SUZ12 ChIP–seq and H3K27me3 CUT&Tag in K-562 Cas9 control
and _MEN1_-KO cells. Source data EXTENDED DATA FIG. 8 TARGETING MENIN POTENTIATES BIVALENT GENE DEREPRESSION IN HUMAN PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS. A, RNA-seq in H9 hESCs treated with DMSO, 1 µM
VTP50469 and/or 3 µM EPZ-011989 for 5 d. Heatmap includes bivalent genes significantly up- or downregulated in combination Menin/EZH2 inhibitor-treated cells compared with DMSO control
(_P_adj < 0.05 and log2FC >1 or <−1). B,C, RNA-seq in wild-type (WT), EZH2-null (_EZH2_−/−) and EZH2-complemented EZH2-null (_EZH2_−/− + _EZH2_) H9 hESCs (GEO: GSE76626)60. B,
Boxplots include the top upregulated bivalent genes in combination with Menin + EZH2 inhibitor-treated H9 hESCs (log2FC > 4 compared with the DMSO control) and depict median log2FC in
expression in EZH2-null or EZH2-complemented H9 hESCs compared with the wild-type control60. Whiskers represent the minimum and maximum, the box represents the interquartile range and the
centre line represents the median. C, Heatmap shows log2FC in expression of selected germ layer-specific genes in either EZH2-null or EZH2-complemented H9 hESCs compared with the wild-type
control60. D, Heatmap shows log2FC in expression of selected germ layer-specific genes in H9 hESCs treated with 1 µM VTP50469 and/or 3 µM EPZ-011989 compared with the DMSO control. E,F,
ChIP–seq of H9 hESCs. Genomic snapshots showing data from KMT2A (E), and KMT2A, H3K4me3 (GEO: GSE96336) and H3K27me3 (GEO: GSE96353)84 (F). EXTENDED DATA FIG. 9 KMT2A/B IS REQUIRED FOR BASAL
MHC-I EXPRESSION. A, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with _KMT2A_ or _KMT2B_ sgRNA compared with control sgRNA and treated with 10 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for 48 h. Bars show mean
percentage of MHC-I expression from three experiments, indicated by points. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s _t_-test compared with control sgRNA. Significant changes are indicated; _P_ <
0.0001. B,C, Immunoblots in K-562 Cas9 and _KMT2B_-KO cells (B), and _KMT2A_-KO ± _KMT2B_-KO cells (C). D, Cell surface MHC-I in K-562 _KMT2B_ + _PCGF1_-KO cells transduced with the
indicated sgRNA and treated for 5 d with DMSO, 1 µM VTP50469 or 3 µM EPZ-011989. Representative plot from three experiments (Supplementary Fig. 3). E, Genomic snapshots of H3K4me3
CUT&Tag in K-562 Cas9 and _KMT2A/B_-KO cells treated ± EPZ-011989. The EZH2i-treated (no IFN-γ) track is also shown in Fig. 8g. F, Immunoblots in K-562 Cas9, _MEN1-_KO and _KMT2A_-KO
cells. G–I, Genomic snapshots of K-562 Cas9 and _MEN1-_KO cells (G,H) H3K4me3 ChIP–seq and KMT2A CUT&RUN (I). The H3K4me3 tracks are also shown in Extended Data Fig. 7h. Source data
EXTENDED DATA FIG. 10 KMT2A/B IS DISPENSABLE FOR MHC ENHANCEOSOME-DRIVEN ACTIVATION. A, Schematic overview of _cis_-regulatory elements in the MHC-I promoter. NLRC5 forms an enhanceosome
with the RFX (regulatory factor X) complex, made up of RFX5, RFXANK and RFAXP (RFX-associated ankyrin-containing protein); CREB (cAMP-responsive-element-binding); and NFY (nuclear
transcription factor Y), which bind the SXY-molecule to activate transcription of MHC-I. B, Immunoblot of K-562 Cas9 cells transduced with control and _RFX5_ sgRNA. C, IFN-γ time course in
K-562 Cas9 and the indicated KO cells treated with 3 µM EPZ-011989 and 25 ng ml−1 IFN-γ for the indicated time periods. D, Immunoblot of K-562 Cas9 and _KMT2A_/_B-_KO cells transduced with
control, _SETD1A_ and/or _SETD1B_ sgRNA. Source data SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Supplementary Figs. 1–3. REPORTING SUMMARY PEER REVIEW FILE SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES 1–7
Supplementary Tables 1–7. Supplementary Tables 1–3. CRISPR screen results. Related to Fig. 1. Supplementary Table 4. Gene lists for RNA-seq data. Related to Fig. 6 and Extended Data Fig. 7.
Supplementary Table 5. Gene list intersection of CRISPR screen and RNA-seq results. Supplementary Tables 6 and 7. Primer sequences. SOURCE DATA SOURCE DATA FIG. 1 Source data. SOURCE DATA
FIG. 2 Source data. SOURCE DATA FIG. 2 Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA FIG. 3 Source data. SOURCE DATA FIG. 3 Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA FIG. 4 Source data. SOURCE DATA
FIG. 5 Source data. SOURCE DATA FIG. 5 Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA FIG. 6 Source data. SOURCE DATA FIG. 7 Source data. SOURCE DATA FIG. 8 Source data. SOURCE DATA FIG. 8
Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 1 Source data. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 2 Source data. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 2 Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA
EXTENDED DATA FIG. 3 Source data. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 3 Unprocessed western blot. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 4 Source data. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 4 Unprocessed
western blots. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 5 Source data. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 6 Source data. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 6 Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED
DATA FIG. 7 Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 9 Source data. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 9 Unprocessed western blots. SOURCE DATA EXTENDED DATA FIG. 10 Unprocessed
western blots. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the
author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Sparbier, C.E., Gillespie, A., Gomez, J. _et al._ Targeting Menin disrupts the KMT2A/B and polycomb balance to paradoxically
activate bivalent genes. _Nat Cell Biol_ 25, 258–272 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-01056-x Download citation * Received: 30 September 2021 * Accepted: 15 November 2022 *
Published: 12 January 2023 * Issue Date: February 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-022-01056-x SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this
content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative