Play all audios:
ABSTRACT Cell type-specific gene expression patterns and dynamics during development or in disease are controlled by _cis_-regulatory elements (CREs), such as promoters and enhancers.
Distinct classes of CREs can be characterized by their epigenomic features, including DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, combinations of histone modifications and conformation of
local chromatin. Tremendous progress has been made in cataloguing CREs in the human genome using bulk transcriptomic and epigenomic methods. However, single-cell epigenomic and multi-omic
technologies have the potential to provide deeper insight into cell type-specific gene regulatory programmes as well as into how they change during development, in response to environmental
cues and through disease pathogenesis. Here, we highlight recent advances in single-cell epigenomic methods and analytical tools and discuss their readiness for human tissue profiling.
Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Access Nature and 54
other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $29.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 12 print issues and
online access $209.00 per year only $17.42 per issue Learn more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes
which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY
OTHERS INTERPRETING NON-CODING DISEASE-ASSOCIATED HUMAN VARIANTS USING SINGLE-CELL EPIGENOMICS Article 09 May 2023 SINGLE-CELL MULTI-OME REGRESSION MODELS IDENTIFY FUNCTIONAL AND
DISEASE-ASSOCIATED ENHANCERS AND ENABLE CHROMATIN POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Article Open access 21 March 2024 LOW INPUT CAPTURE HI-C (LICHI-C) IDENTIFIES PROMOTER-ENHANCER INTERACTIONS AT
HIGH-RESOLUTION Article Open access 17 January 2023 REFERENCES * Lee, T. I. & Young, R. A. Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease. _Cell_ 152, 1237–1251 (2013).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Levine, M., Cattoglio, C. & Tjian, R. Looping back to leap forward: transcription enters a new era. _Cell_ 157, 13–25 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar
* Oudelaar, A. M. & Higgs, D. R. The relationship between genome structure and function. _Nat. Rev. Genet._ 22, 154–168 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * ENCODE Project
Consortium et al. Expanded encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes. _Nature_ 583, 699–710 (2020). Article Google Scholar * Cramer, P. Organization and regulation of
gene transcription. _Nature_ 573, 45–54 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Doni Jayavelu, N., Jajodia, A., Mishra, A. & Hawkins, R. D. Candidate silencer elements for the human and
mouse genomes. _Nat. Commun._ 11, 1061 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Gisselbrecht, S. S. et al. Transcriptional silencers in Drosophila serve a dual role as transcriptional
enhancers in alternate cellular contexts. _Mol. Cell_ 77, 324–337 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Pang, B. & Snyder, M. P. Systematic identification of silencers in human cells.
_Nat. Genet._ 52, 254–263 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Segert, J. A., Gisselbrecht, S. S. & Bulyk, M. L. Transcriptional silencers: driving gene expression with the brakes on.
_Trends Genet._ 37, 514–527 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Batut, P. J. et al. Genome organization controls transcriptional dynamics during development. _Science_ 375, 566–570
(2022). Article CAS Google Scholar * Hallikas, O. et al. Genome-wide prediction of mammalian enhancers based on analysis of transcription-factor binding affinity. _Cell_ 124, 47–59
(2006). Article CAS Google Scholar * Pennacchio, L. A. & Rubin, E. M. Comparative genomic tools and databases: providing insights into the human genome. _J. Clin. Invest._ 111,
1099–1106 (2003). Article CAS Google Scholar * Thurman, R. E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. _Nature_ 489, 75–82 (2012). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Boyle, A. P. et al. High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. _Cell_ 132, 311–322 (2008). Article CAS Google Scholar * Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi,
P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome
position. _Nat. Methods_ 10, 1213–1218 (2013). Article CAS Google Scholar * Lister, R. et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. _Nature_ 462,
315–322 (2009). Article CAS Google Scholar * Albert, I. et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. _Nature_ 446,
572–576 (2007). Article CAS Google Scholar * Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. _Cell_ 129, 823–837 (2007). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. _Science_ 316, 1497–1502 (2007). Article CAS Google Scholar
* Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. _Nature_ 448, 553–560 (2007). Article CAS Google Scholar * Dekker, J. &
Mirny, L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. _Cell_ 164, 1110–1121 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Rowley, M. J. & Corces, V. G. Organizational principles
of 3D genome architecture. _Nat. Rev. Genet._ 19, 789–800 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding
principles of the human genome. _Science_ 326, 289–293 (2009). Article CAS Google Scholar * Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of
chromatin looping. _Cell_ 159, 1665–1680 (2014). Article CAS Google Scholar * Boix, C. A., James, B. T., Park, Y. P., Meuleman, W. & Kellis, M. Regulatory genomic circuitry of human
disease loci by integrative epigenomics. _Nature_ 590, 300–307 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Meuleman, W. et al. Index and biological spectrum of human DNase I hypersensitive
sites. _Nature_ 584, 244–251 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. _Nature_ 518, 317–330
(2015). Article Google Scholar * Grubert, F. et al. Landscape of cohesin-mediated chromatin loops in the human genome. _Nature_ 583, 737–743 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Calderon, D. et al. Landscape of stimulation-responsive chromatin across diverse human immune cells. _Nat. Genet._ 51, 1494–1505 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Zhang, K. et al. A
single-cell atlas of chromatin accessibility in the human genome. _Cell_ 184, 5985–6001 (2021). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE INTEGRATED SCIATAC-SEQ ANALYSIS OF A LARGE PANEL OF ADULT AND FETAL
HUMAN TISSUE TO CATALOG CCRES IN 222 CELL CLUSTERS. Article CAS Google Scholar * Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. _Science_ 376, 44–53 (2022). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Luo, C., Hajkova, P. & Ecker, J. R. Dynamic DNA methylation: in the right place at the right time. _Science_ 361, 1336–1340 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Chen, Z.
& Zhang, Y. Role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in development. _Annu. Rev. Biochem._ 89, 135–158 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Wu, X. & Zhang, Y. TET-mediated active
DNA demethylation: mechanism, function and beyond. _Nat. Rev. Genet._ 18, 517–534 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Yin, Y. et al. Impact of cytosine methylation on DNA binding
specificities of human transcription factors. _Science_ 356, eaaj2239 (2017). Article Google Scholar * He, Y. & Ecker, J. R. Non-CG methylation in the human genome. _Annu. Rev.
Genomics Hum. Genet._ 16, 55–77 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * Miura, F., Enomoto, Y., Dairiki, R. & Ito, T. Amplification-free whole-genome bisulfite sequencing by
post-bisulfite adaptor tagging. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 40, e136 (2012). Article CAS Google Scholar * Angermueller, C. et al. Parallel single-cell sequencing links transcriptional and
epigenetic heterogeneity. _Nat. Methods_ 13, 229–232 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Smallwood, S. A. et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic
heterogeneity. _Nat. Methods_ 11, 817–820 (2014). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE FIRST SINGLE-CELL BISULFITE SEQUENCING APPROACH. Article CAS Google Scholar * Farlik, M. et al. Single-cell DNA
methylome sequencing and bioinformatic inference of epigenomic cell-state dynamics. _Cell Rep._ 10, 1386–1397 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * Luo, C. et al. Single-cell methylomes
identify neuronal subtypes and regulatory elements in mammalian cortex. _Science_ 357, 600–604 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Luo, C. et al. Robust single-cell DNA methylome
profiling with snmC-seq2. _Nat. Commun._ 9, 3824 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Yao, Z. et al. A transcriptomic and epigenomic cell atlas of the mouse primary motor cortex. _Nature_ 598,
103–110 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Liu, H. et al. DNA methylation atlas of the mouse brain at single-cell resolution. _Nature_ 598, 120–128 (2021). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES
APPLICATION OF SNMC-SEQ2 TO MOUSE BRAIN TISSUES RESULTING IN IDENTIFICATION 161 BRAIN CELL TYPES AND CELL-TYPE SPECIFIC CRES. Article CAS Google Scholar * Guo, H. et al. Single-cell
methylome landscapes of mouse embryonic stem cells and early embryos analyzed using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. _Genome Res._ 23, 2126–2135 (2013). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Shareef, S. J. et al. Extended-representation bisulfite sequencing of gene regulatory elements in multiplexed samples and single cells. _Nat. Biotechnol._
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00910-x (2021). Article Google Scholar * Mulqueen, R. M. et al. Highly scalable generation of DNA methylation profiles in single cells. _Nat.
Biotechnol._ 36, 428–431 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Luo, C. et al. Single nucleus multi-omics identifies human cortical cell regulatory genome diversity. _Cell Genom._
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100107 (2022). Article Google Scholar * Zaret, K. S. Pioneer transcription factors initiating gene network changes. _Annu. Rev. Genet._ 54, 367–385
(2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Jin, W. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites in single cells and FFPE tissue samples. _Nature_ 528, 142–146 (2015). Article
CAS Google Scholar * Gao, W. et al. Multiplex indexing approach for the detection of DNase I hypersensitive sites in single cells. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 49, e56 (2021). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Chen, X., Miragaia, R. J., Natarajan, K. N. & Teichmann, S. A. A rapid and robust method for single cell chromatin accessibility profiling. _Nat. Commun._ 9, 5345 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Xu, W. et al. A plate-based single-cell ATAC-seq workflow for fast and robust profiling of chromatin accessibility. _Nat. Protoc._ 16, 4084–4107 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Graybuck, L. T. et al. Enhancer viruses for combinatorial cell-subclass-specific labeling. _Neuron_ 109, 1449–1464 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Mich, J. K. et al. Functional enhancer elements drive subclass-selective expression from mouse to primate neocortex. _Cell Rep._ 34, 108754 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Mezger, A.
et al. High-throughput chromatin accessibility profiling at single-cell resolution. _Nat. Commun._ 9, 3647 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Single-cell chromatin
accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation. _Nature_ 523, 486–490 (2015). THIS PAPER INTRODUCES SCATAC-SEQ USING MICROFLUIDICS. Article CAS Google Scholar * Satpathy, A. T.
et al. Massively parallel single-cell chromatin landscapes of human immune cell development and intratumoral T cell exhaustion. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 37, 925–936 (2019). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES A
DROPLET-BASED SCATAC-SEQ PROCEDURE. Article CAS Google Scholar * Lareau, C. A. et al. Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive-scale single-cell chromatin accessibility. _Nat.
Biotechnol._ 37, 916–924 (2019). THIS PAPER INTRODUCES THE COMBINATION OF COMBINATORIAL INDEXING WITH DROPLET-BASED APPROACHES FOR SCATAC-SEQ. Article CAS Google Scholar * Cusanovich, D.
A. et al. Multiplex single cell profiling of chromatin accessibility by combinatorial cellular indexing. _Science_ 348, 910–914 (2015). THIS PAPER INTRODUCES SCATAC-SEQ USING COMBINATORIAL
INDEXING. Article CAS Google Scholar * Wang, K. et al. Simple oligonucleotide-based multiplexing of single-cell chromatin accessibility. _Mol. Cell_ 81, 4319–4332 (2021). Article CAS
Google Scholar * De Rop, F. et al. HyDrop enables droplet based single-cell ATAC-seq and single-cell RNA-seq using dissolvable hydrogel beads. _Elife_ https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73971
(2022). Article Google Scholar * Domcke, S. et al. A human cell atlas of fetal chromatin accessibility. _Science_ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7612 (2020). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES
THREE-ROUND INDEXING FOR SCIATAC-SEQ TO GENERATE A FETAL TISSUE SINGLE-CELL CHROMATIN ACCESSIBILITY ATLAS. Article Google Scholar * Sinnamon, J. R. et al. The accessible chromatin
landscape of the murine hippocampus at single-cell resolution. _Genome Res._ 29, 857–869 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Cusanovich, D. A. et al. A single-cell atlas of in vivo
mammalian chromatin accessibility. _Cell_ 174, 1309–1324 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Preissl, S. et al. Single-nucleus analysis of accessible chromatin in developing mouse
forebrain reveals cell-type-specific transcriptional regulation. _Nat. Neurosci._ 21, 432–439 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Li, Y. E. et al. An atlas of gene regulatory elements in
adult mouse cerebrum. _Nature_ 598, 129–136 (2021). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION OF SNATAC-SEQ TO MOUSE BRAIN TISSUES RESULTING IN IDENTIFICATION OF 160 BRAIN CELL TYPES AND
CELL-TYPE SPECIFIC CRES. Article CAS Google Scholar * LaFave, L. M. et al. Epigenomic state transitions characterize tumor progression in mouse lung adenocarcinoma. _Cancer Cell_ 38,
212–228 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Cusanovich, D. A. et al. The cis-regulatory dynamics of embryonic development at single-cell resolution. _Nature_ 555, 538–542 (2018). Article
CAS Google Scholar * Thornton, C. A. et al. Spatially mapped single-cell chromatin accessibility. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 1274 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Lake, B. B. et al.
Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptional and epigenetic states in the human adult brain. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 36, 70–80 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Mulqueen, R. M. et
al. High-content single-cell combinatorial indexing. _Nat. Biotechnol._ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00962-z (2021). Article Google Scholar * Regev, A. et al. The human cell atlas.
_Elife_ https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27041 (2017). Article Google Scholar * Allis, C. D. & Jenuwein, T. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. _Nat. Rev. Genet._ 17, 487–500
(2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Heintzman, N. D. et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. _Nat. Genet._ 39,
311–318 (2007). Article CAS Google Scholar * Cenik, B. K. & Shilatifard, A. COMPASS and SWI/SNF complexes in development and disease. _Nat. Rev. Genet._ 22, 38–58 (2021). Article
CAS Google Scholar * Calo, E. & Wysocka, J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? _Mol. Cell_ 49, 825–837 (2013). Article CAS Google Scholar * Rotem, A. et al.
Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 33, 1165–1172 (2015). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE FIRST SCCHIP-SEQ PROTOCOL. Article CAS Google
Scholar * Grosselin, K. et al. High-throughput single-cell ChIP-seq identifies heterogeneity of chromatin states in breast cancer. _Nat. Genet._ 51, 1060–1066 (2019). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Ai, S. et al. Profiling chromatin states using single-cell itChIP-seq. _Nat. Cell Biol._ 21, 1164–1172 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Schmid, M., Durussel, T. &
Laemmli, U. K. ChIC and ChEC; genomic mapping of chromatin proteins. _Mol. Cell_ 16, 147–157 (2004). CAS Google Scholar * Skene, P. J. & Henikoff, S. An efficient targeted nuclease
strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites. _Elife_ https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21856 (2017). Article Google Scholar * Kaya-Okur, H. S. et al. CUT&Tag for efficient
epigenomic profiling of small samples and single cells. _Nat. Commun._ 10, 1930 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Ku, W. L. et al. Single-cell chromatin immunocleavage sequencing
(scChIC-seq) to profile histone modification. _Nat. Methods_ 16, 323–325 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Hainer, S. J., Boskovic, A., McCannell, K. N., Rando, O. J. & Fazzio, T.
G. Profiling of pluripotency factors in single cells and early embryos. _Cell_ 177, 1319–1329 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ku, W. L., Pan, L., Cao, Y., Gao, W. & Zhao, K.
Profiling single-cell histone modifications using indexing chromatin immunocleavage sequencing. _Genome Res._ 31, 1831–1842 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Carter, B. et al. Mapping
histone modifications in low cell number and single cells using antibody-guided chromatin tagmentation (ACT-seq). _Nat. Commun._ 10, 3747 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Wang, Q. et al.
CoBATCH for high-throughput single-cell epigenomic profiling. _Mol. Cell_ 76, 206–216 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Wu, S. J. et al. Single-cell CUT&Tag analysis of chromatin
modifications in differentiation and tumor progression. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 39, 819–824 (2021). TOGETHER WITH BARTOSOVIC ET AL. (2021), THIS PAPER DESCRIBES DROPLET-BASED SCCUT&TAG.
Article CAS Google Scholar * Bartosovic, M., Kabbe, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues. _Nat.
Biotechnol._ 39, 825–835 (2021). TOGETHER WITH WU ET AL. (2021), THIS PAPER DESCRIBES DROPLET-BASED SCCUT&TAG. Article CAS Google Scholar * Bartlett, D. A. et al. High-throughput
single-cell epigenomic profiling by targeted insertion of promoters (TIP-seq). _J. Cell Biol._ https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202103078 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Gibcus, J. H. et al. A
pathway for mitotic chromosome formation. _Science_ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao6135 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Zhang, H. et al. Chromatin structure dynamics during the
mitosis-to-G1 phase transition. _Nature_ 576, 158–162 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Davidson, I. F. & Peters, J. M. Genome folding through loop extrusion by SMC complexes.
_Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol._ 22, 445–464 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. _Nature_ 502,
59–64 (2013). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE FIRST SCHI-C PROTOCOL. Article CAS Google Scholar * Stevens, T. J. et al. 3D structures of individual mammalian genomes studied by single-cell Hi-C.
_Nature_ 544, 59–64 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Flyamer, I. M. et al. Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition. _Nature_ 544,
110–114 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Tan, L., Xing, D., Chang, C. H., Li, H. & Xie, X. S. Three-dimensional genome structures of single diploid human cells. _Science_ 361,
924–928 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Tan, L. et al. Changes in genome architecture and transcriptional dynamics progress independently of sensory experience during post-natal
brain development. _Cell_ 184, 741–758 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Nagano, T. et al. Cell-cycle dynamics of chromosomal organization at single-cell resolution. _Nature_ 547,
61–67 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ramani, V. et al. Massively multiplex single-cell Hi-C. _Nat. Methods_ 14, 263–266 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ramani, V. et al.
Sci-Hi-C: a single-cell Hi-C method for mapping 3D genome organization in large number of single cells. _Methods_ 170, 61–68 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Arrastia, M. V. et al.
Single-cell measurement of higher-order 3D genome organization with scSPRITE. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 40, 64–73 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar * Zhu, C., Preissl, S. & Ren, B.
Single-cell multimodal omics: the power of many. _Nat. Methods_ 17, 11–14 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Elmentaite, R., Dominguez Conde, C., Yang, L. & Teichmann, S. A.
Single-cell atlases: shared and tissue-specific cell types across human organs. _Nat. Rev. Genet._ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00449-w (2022). Article Google Scholar * Hu, Y. et al.
Simultaneous profiling of transcriptome and DNA methylome from a single cell. _Genome Biol._ 17, 88 (2016). Article Google Scholar * Hou, Y. et al. Single-cell triple omics sequencing
reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas. _Cell Res._ 26, 304–319 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Bian, S. et al. Single-cell
multiomics sequencing and analyses of human colorectal cancer. _Science_ 362, 1060–1063 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Cao, J. et al. Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and
gene expression in thousands of single cells. _Science_ 361, 1380–1385 (2018). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE FIRST SINGLE-CELL CO-ASSAY FOR ATAC-SEQ AND RNA EXPRESSION. Article CAS Google
Scholar * Chen, S., Lake, B. B. & Zhang, K. High-throughput sequencing of the transcriptome and chromatin accessibility in the same cell. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 37, 1452–1457 (2019).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Zhu, C. et al. An ultra high-throughput method for single-cell joint analysis of open chromatin and transcriptome. _Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol._ 26, 1063–1070
(2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ma, S. et al. Chromatin potential identified by shared single-cell profiling of RNA and chromatin. _Cell_ 183, 1103–1116 (2020). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Xing, Q. R. et al. Parallel bimodal single-cell sequencing of transcriptome and chromatin accessibility. _Genome Res._ 30, 1027–1039 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Liu,
L. et al. Deconvolution of single-cell multi-omics layers reveals regulatory heterogeneity. _Nat. Commun._ 10, 470 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Plongthongkum, N., Diep, D., Chen,
S., Lake, B. B. & Zhang, K. Scalable dual-omics profiling with single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and mRNA expression sequencing 2 (SNARE-seq2). _Nat. Protoc._ 16, 4992–5029 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Xiong, H., Luo, Y., Wang, Q., Yu, X. & He, A. Single-cell joint detection of chromatin occupancy and transcriptome enables higher-dimensional epigenomic
reconstructions. _Nat. Methods_ 18, 652–660 (2021). TOGETHER WITH ZHU ET AL. (2021), THIS PAPER INTRODUCES JOINT PROFILING OF HISTONE MODIFICATIONS AND RNA FROM THE SAME CELL USING
COMBINATORIAL INDEXING. Article CAS Google Scholar * Zhu, C. et al. Joint profiling of histone modifications and transcriptome in single cells from mouse brain. _Nat. Methods_ 18, 283–292
(2021). TOGETHER WITH XIONG ET AL. (2021), THIS PAPER INTRODUCES JOINT PROFILING OF HISTONE MODIFICATIONS AND RNA FROM THE SAME CELL USING COMBINATORIAL INDEXING. Article CAS Google
Scholar * Sun, Z. et al. Joint single-cell multiomic analysis in Wnt3a induced asymmetric stem cell division. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 5941 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Stoeckius, M.
et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. _Nat. Methods_ 14, 865–868 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Mimitou, E. P. et al. Scalable, multimodal
profiling of chromatin accessibility, gene expression and protein levels in single cells. _Nat. Biotechnol._ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-00927-2 (2021). Article Google Scholar *
Swanson, E. et al. Simultaneous trimodal single-cell measurement of transcripts, epitopes, and chromatin accessibility using TEA-seq. _Elife_ https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63632 (2021).
Article Google Scholar * Chen, X. et al. Joint single-cell DNA accessibility and protein epitope profiling reveals environmental regulation of epigenomic heterogeneity. _Nat. Commun._ 9,
4590 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Fiskin, E. et al. Single-cell profiling of proteins and chromatin accessibility using PHAGE-ATAC. _Nat. Biotechnol._
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01065-5 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Zhang, B. et al. Characterizing cellular heterogeneity in chromatin state with scCUT&Tag-pro. _Nat.
Biotechnol._ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01250-0 (2022). Article Google Scholar * Chen, A. F. et al. NEAT-seq: simultaneous profiling of intra-nuclear proteins, chromatin
accessibility and gene expression in single cells. _Nat. Methods_ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-022-01461-y (2022). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES COMBINED PROFILING OF NUCLEAR TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
PROTEIN LEVELS, CHROMATIN ACCESSIBILITY AND TRANSCRIPTOMES. Article Google Scholar * Guo, F. et al. Single-cell multi-omics sequencing of mouse early embryos and embryonic stem cells.
_Cell Res._ 27, 967–988 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Pott, S. Simultaneous measurement of chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, and nucleosome phasing in single cells. _Elife_
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.23203 (2017). Article Google Scholar * Gu, C., Liu, S., Wu, Q., Zhang, L. & Guo, F. Integrative single-cell analysis of transcriptome, DNA methylome and
chromatin accessibility in mouse oocytes. _Cell Res._ 29, 110–123 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Clark, S. J. et al. scNMT-seq enables joint profiling of chromatin accessibility DNA
methylation and transcription in single cells. _Nat. Commun._ 9, 781 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Wang, Y. et al. Single-cell multiomics sequencing reveals the functional regulatory
landscape of early embryos. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 1247 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Tedesco, M. et al. Chromatin Velocity reveals epigenetic dynamics by single-cell profiling of
heterochromatin and euchromatin. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 40, 235–244 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar * Gopalan, S., Wang, Y., Harper, N. W., Garber, M. & Fazzio, T. G. Simultaneous
profiling of multiple chromatin proteins in the same cells. _Mol. Cell_ 81, 4736–4746.e5 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Li, G. et al. Joint profiling of DNA methylation and
chromatin architecture in single cells. _Nat. Methods_ 16, 991–993 (2019). TOGETHER WITH LEE ET AL. (2019), THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE FIRST METHODS FOR SINGLE-CELL JOINT PROFILING OF
CHROMATIN ARCHITECTURE AND DNA METHYLATION. Article CAS Google Scholar * Lee, D. S. et al. Simultaneous profiling of 3D genome structure and DNA methylation in single human cells. _Nat.
Methods_ 16, 999–1006 (2019). TOGETHER WITH LI ET AL. (2019), THIS PAPER DESCRIBES THE FIRST METHODS FOR SINGLE-CELL JOINT PROFILING OF CHROMATIN ARCHITECTURE AND DNA METHYLATION. Article
CAS Google Scholar * Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. _Nat. Methods_ 18, 1333–1341 (2021). Article
CAS Google Scholar * Granja, J. M. et al. ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. _Nat. Genet._ 53, 403–411 (2021). Article CAS
Google Scholar * Fang, R. et al. Comprehensive analysis of single cell ATAC-seq data with SnapATAC. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 1337 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Bravo Gonzalez-Blas, C.
et al. cisTopic: cis-regulatory topic modeling on single-cell ATAC-seq data. _Nat. Methods_ 16, 397–400 (2019). THE PAPERS BY STUART ET AL.135, GRANJA ET AL.136, FANG ET AL.137 AND BRAVO
GONZALEZ-BLAS ET AL.138 DESCRIBE SOFTWARE PACKAGES FOR SCATAC-SEQ ANALYSIS. Article CAS Google Scholar * Xiong, L. et al. SCALE method for single-cell ATAC-seq analysis via latent feature
extraction. _Nat. Commun._ 10, 4576 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Forgy, E. W. Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency versus interpretability of classifications.
_Biometrics_ 21, 768–769 (1965). Google Scholar * Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J. & Xu, X. in _Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data
Mining (KDD-96)_ 226–231 (AAAI Press, 1996). * Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. _J. Stat. Mech. Theory
Exp._ 2008, P10008 (2008). Article Google Scholar * Traag, V. A. Faster unfolding of communities: speeding up the Louvain algorithm. _Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys._ 92,
032801 (2015). Article CAS Google Scholar * van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. _J. Mach. Learn. Res._ 9, 2579–2605 (2008). Google Scholar * McInnes, L.,
John, H. & Melville, J. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. Preprint at _arXiv_ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 (2018). Article Google
Scholar * Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R. & Klein, A. M. Scrublet: computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. _Cell Syst._ 8, 281–291 (2019). Article
CAS Google Scholar * Thibodeau, A. et al. AMULET: a novel read count-based method for effective multiplet detection from single nucleus ATAC-seq data. _Genome Biol._ 22, 252 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar * Pierce, S. E., Granja, J. M. & Greenleaf, W. J. High-throughput single-cell chromatin accessibility CRISPR screens enable unbiased identification of
regulatory networks in cancer. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 2969 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Danese, A. et al. EpiScanpy: integrated single-cell epigenomic analysis. _Nat. Commun._ 12,
5228 (2021). THIS PAPER DESCRIBES A SOFTWARE PACKAGE FOR SINGLE-CELL EPIGENOMIC ANALYSIS. Article CAS Google Scholar * Zhang, H. et al. Fast alignment and preprocessing of chromatin
profiles with Chromap. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 6566 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * de Boer, C. G. & Regev, A. BROCKMAN: deciphering variance in epigenomic regulators by k-mer
factorization. _BMC Bioinformatics_ 19, 253 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Zamanighomi, M. et al. Unsupervised clustering and epigenetic classification of single cells. _Nat. Commun._ 9,
2410 (2018). Article Google Scholar * Baker, S. M., Rogerson, C., Hayes, A., Sharrocks, A. D. & Rattray, M. Classifying cells with Scasat, a single-cell ATAC-seq analysis tool.
_Nucleic Acids Res._ 47, e10 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Ji, Z., Zhou, W. & Ji, H. Single-cell regulome data analysis by SCRAT. _Bioinformatics_ 33, 2930–2932 (2017). Article CAS
Google Scholar * Fowlkes, C., Belongie, S., Chung, F. & Malik, J. Spectral grouping using the Nystrom method. _IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell._ 26, 214–225 (2004). Article
Google Scholar * Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. _Cell_ 177, 1888–1902 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and
accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. _Nat. Methods_ 16, 1289–1296 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Haghverdi, L., Lun, A. T. L., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C.
Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 36, 421–427 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Kang, J. B. et al.
Efficient and precise single-cell reference atlas mapping with Symphony. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 5890 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Argelaguet, R., Cuomo, A. S. E., Stegle, O. &
Marioni, J. C. Computational principles and challenges in single-cell data integration. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 39, 1202–1215 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Hao, Y. et al. Integrated
analysis of multimodal single-cell data. _Cell_ 184, 3573–3587 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Argelaguet, R. et al. MOFA+: a statistical framework for comprehensive integration of
multi-modal single-cell data. _Genome Biol._ 21, 111 (2020). Article Google Scholar * Jin, S., Zhang, L. & Nie, Q. scAI: an unsupervised approach for the integrative analysis of
parallel single-cell transcriptomic and epigenomic profiles. _Genome Biol._ 21, 25 (2020). Article Google Scholar * Kim, H. J., Lin, Y., Geddes, T. A., Yang, J. Y. H. & Yang, P.
CiteFuse enables multi-modal analysis of CITE-seq data. _Bioinformatics_ 36, 4137–4143 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Gayoso, A. et al. Joint probabilistic modeling of single-cell
multi-omic data with totalVI. _Nat. Methods_ 18, 272–282 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Welch, J. D. et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts features of
brain cell identity. _Cell_ 177, 1873–1887 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Barkas, N. et al. Joint analysis of heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq dataset collections. _Nat. Methods_
16, 695–698 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Jansen, C. et al. Building gene regulatory networks from scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq using linked self organizing maps. _PLoS Comput. Biol._
15, e1006555 (2019). Article Google Scholar * Welch, J. D., Hartemink, A. J. & Prins, J. F. MATCHER: manifold alignment reveals correspondence between single cell transcriptome and
epigenome dynamics. _Genome Biol._ 18, 138 (2017). Article Google Scholar * Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). _Genome Biol._ 9, R137 (2008). Article Google Scholar
* Haeussler, M. et al. The UCSC genome browser database: 2019 update. _Nucleic Acids Res._ 47, D853–D858 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics
viewer. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 29, 24–26 (2011). Article CAS Google Scholar * Li, D., Hsu, S., Purushotham, D., Sears, R. L. & Wang, T. WashU epigenome browser update 2019. _Nucleic
Acids Res._ 47, W158–W165 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. chromVAR: inferring transcription-factor-associated
accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. _Nat. Methods_ 14, 975–978 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Pliner, H. A. et al. Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from
single-cell chromatin accessibility data. _Mol. Cell_ 71, 858–871.e8 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Yu, M. et al. SnapHiC: a computational pipeline to identify chromatin loops from
single-cell Hi-C data. _Nat. Methods_ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01231-2 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell
trajectories. _Nat. Methods_ 14, 979–982 (2017). Article CAS Google Scholar * Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. _Nature_ 566, 496–502
(2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Street, K. et al. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. _BMC Genomics_ 19, 477 (2018). Article Google
Scholar * Angerer, P. et al. destiny: diffusion maps for large-scale single-cell data in R. _Bioinformatics_ 32, 1241–1243 (2016). Article CAS Google Scholar * Corces, M. R. et al.
Single-cell epigenomic analyses implicate candidate causal variants at inherited risk loci for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. _Nat. Genet._ 52, 1158–1168 (2020). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Bakken, T. E. et al. Comparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse. _Nature_ 598, 111–119 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Buenrostro, J. D. et
al. Integrated single-cell analysis maps the continuous regulatory landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation. _Cell_ 173, 1535–1548.e16 (2018). Article CAS Google Scholar * Muto,
Y. et al. Single cell transcriptional and chromatin accessibility profiling redefine cellular heterogeneity in the adult human kidney. _Nat. Commun._ 12, 2190 (2021). Article CAS Google
Scholar * Duong, T. E. et al. A single-cell regulatory map of postnatal lung alveologenesis in humans and mice. _Cell Genom._ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100108 (2022). Article
Google Scholar * Zhang, Z. et al. Single nucleus transcriptome and chromatin accessibility of postmortem human pituitaries reveal diverse stem cell regulatory mechanisms. _Cell Rep._ 38,
110467 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar * Rai, V. et al. Single-cell ATAC-Seq in human pancreatic islets and deep learning upscaling of rare cells reveals cell-specific type 2 diabetes
regulatory signatures. _Mol. Metab._ 32, 109–121 (2020). Article CAS Google Scholar * Wang, A. et al. Single-cell multiomic profiling of human lungs reveals cell-type-specific and
age-dynamic control of SARS-CoV2 host genes. _Elife_ https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62522 (2020). Article Google Scholar * Ziffra, R. S. et al. Single-cell epigenomics reveals mechanisms of
human cortical development. _Nature_ 598, 205–213 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Trevino, A. E. et al. Chromatin and gene-regulatory dynamics of the developing human cerebral
cortex at single-cell resolution. _Cell_ 184, 5053–5069.e23 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Morabito, S. et al. Single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and transcriptomic
characterization of Alzheimer’s disease. _Nat. Genet._ 53, 1143–1155 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Fasolino, M. et al. Single-cell multi-omics analysis of human pancreatic islets
reveals novel cellular states in type 1 diabetes. _Nat. Metab._ 4, 284–299 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar * Granja, J. M. et al. Single-cell multiomic analysis identifies regulatory
programs in mixed-phenotype acute leukemia. _Nat. Biotechnol._ 37, 1458–1465 (2019). Article CAS Google Scholar * Hocker, J. D. et al. Cardiac cell type-specific gene regulatory programs
and disease risk association. _Sci. Adv._ https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1444 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Chiou, J. et al. Interpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and
single-cell epigenomics. _Nature_ 594, 398–402 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Ord, T. et al. Single-cell epigenomics and functional fine-mapping of atherosclerosis GWAS loci. _Circ.
Res._ 129, 240–258 (2021). Article Google Scholar * Sheng, X. et al. Mapping the genetic architecture of human traits to cell types in the kidney identifies mechanisms of disease and
potential treatments. _Nat. Genet._ 53, 1322–1333 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Chiou, J. et al. Single-cell chromatin accessibility identifies pancreatic islet cell type- and
state-specific regulatory programs of diabetes risk. _Nat. Genet._ 53, 455–466 (2021). Article CAS Google Scholar * Orchard, P. et al. Human and rat skeletal muscle single-nuclei
multi-omic integrative analyses nominate causal cell types, regulatory elements, and SNPs for complex traits. _Genome Res._ https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.268482.120 (2021). Article Google
Scholar * Deng, Y. et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. _Science_ 375, 681–686 (2022). Article CAS Google Scholar *
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. _Genome Biol._ 19, 15 (2018). Article Google Scholar Download references
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We apologize to those authors whose work we fail to include in this Review due to space constraints. Research in the Ren lab is funded by the Ludwig Institute and the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants 1UM1HG009402, 1U19MH114831, 1U01MH121282, 1R01AG066018, R01AG067153, U01DA052769, 1UM1HG011585, RF1MH124612, 1R56AG069107, R01EY031663,
1U01HG012059, R24AG073198 and RF1MH128838. The Center for Epigenomics was supported, in part, by the UC San Diego School of Medicine and by NIH grants R01EY030591, U01HL148867, U01DK120429
and R01HD102534. The Gaulton lab is funded by NIH grants DK114650, DK120429, DK122607, DK105554 and HG012059. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Center for Epigenomics, University
of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA Sebastian Preissl & Bing Ren * Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of
Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany Sebastian Preissl * Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Diabetes Research Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA Kyle J. Gaulton *
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA Bing Ren * Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA, USA
Bing Ren Authors * Sebastian Preissl View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Kyle J. Gaulton View author publications You can also search for
this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Bing Ren View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS The authors contributed equally to all
aspects of the article. CORRESPONDING AUTHORS Correspondence to Sebastian Preissl, Kyle J. Gaulton or Bing Ren. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS B.R. is a shareholder and consultant
of Arima Genomics, Inc., and a co-founder of Epigenome Technologies, Inc. K.J.G. is a consultant of Genentech and a shareholder in Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Neurocrine Biosciences. These
relationships have been disclosed to and approved by the UCSD Independent Review Committee. S.P. declares no competing interests. PEER REVIEW PEER REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature Reviews
Genetics_ thanks T. Stuart, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains
neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RELATED LINKS CHROMIUM SINGLE CELL MULTIOME ATAC+GENE EXPRESSION:
https://www.10xgenomics.com/products/single-cell-multiome-atac-plus-gene-expression SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION GLOSSARY * _Cis-_regulatory elements (CREs).
Non-coding DNA sequences that regulate transcription of genes located on the same chromosome. They include enhancers, promoters, insulators, silencing elements and tethering elements.
Different classes of CREs can be identified using a combination of molecular markers, including chromatin accessibility and epigenetic modifications. * Promoters CREs located at the
transcriptional start site of a gene. * Enhancers CREs that can activate target gene expression from a large genomic distance, ranging from several kilobases to even millions of base pairs.
They can be found either upstream or downstream of the target gene promoter. * Insulators CREs that prevent an enhancer from activating a target gene when placed between the enhancer and
gene promoter but not when placed outside. An insulator also refers to a boundary element that can prevent the spreading of heterochromatin into euchromatic regions. * Silencer elements CREs
that can be located close or distal to the transcriptional start site of the target gene. Silencers are bound by repressive transcription factors to inactivate gene expression. * Tethering
elements CREs that can bring together promoters and enhancers for gene activation. * Chromatin A complex of DNA and histone proteins. The basic unit of chromatin is the nucleosome. * Histone
modifications Covalent modifications to histone proteins, such as methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and sumoylation, that take place at lysine, serine, threonine,
arginine and other residues. Histone modifications are catalysed by a diverse panel of enzymes referred to as writers, removed by a different set of proteins known as erasers, and recognized
by chromatin-binding proteins known as readers. Activity of CREs is directly linked to distinct histone modifications due to the activities of writers, erasers and readers. * Epigenome The
combined features that enable stable propagation of different gene expression patterns from the same genome sequence. These include methylation of DNA at cytosine bases (mC), chemical
modification of the histone proteins, chromatin accessibility and higher-order chromatin structures. * Tagmentation The process by which double-stranded DNA is cleaved by the transposase
Tn5, creating short DNA fragments that are simultaneously tagged with PCR adapters. Tagmentation using Tn5 preferentially occurs at accessible or open chromatin and this property is used in
ATAC-seq and other related assays. * 3D-chromatin organization Folding of the chromatin fibres inside the nucleus governs the spatial proximity between genes and CREs. While complex and
variable between cells, the chromatin organization exhibits certain common features, including A/B compartments, topologically associating domains and loops. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints
and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Preissl, S., Gaulton, K.J. & Ren, B. Characterizing _cis_-regulatory elements using single-cell epigenomics. _Nat Rev Genet_ 24,
21–43 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00509-1 Download citation * Accepted: 24 May 2022 * Published: 15 July 2022 * Issue Date: January 2023 * DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-022-00509-1 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not
currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative