Play all audios:
Aquatic weeds throughout the world pose significant threats to water security. These threats are not only to biodiversity and ecological processes but also land and river communities that
rely heavily on water resources – especially in developing countries. Wetlands, rivers and lakes throughout Africa have been invaded by several aquatic weed species. These include some of
the most damaging worldwide, such as water hyacinth, Kariba weed and water lettuce. These aquatic weeds not only threaten one of Africa’s most valuable resources – water – but also the
well-being of these communities that rely heavily on the abundant resources that Africa’s waters offer. Invasive aquatic weeds are an ongoing problem. For example, in South Africa alone,
more than 400 sites are infested with alien aquatic plants. Every year new sites are being recorded, some of them having major socioeconomic implications. The impact that aquatic weeds have
include: * reducing water storage capacity, specially potable water; * impeding flow and interfering with navigation; * promoting habitat for mosquitoes; and * spreading water borne disease.
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IS THE WAY FORWARD Control technologies exist for these weeds. These are chemical, mechanical and biological control methods. Chemical control involves the use of
registered herbicides, which are usually sprayed directly onto the plants. Mechanical control is the use of mechanical harvesters or manual labour to remove plants from the system where they
are problematic. Biological control is the use of host specific organisms, usually insects, in weed biological control. Many herbivorous insects have evolved and developed an intricate
relationship with plants. Often, the herbivore is bound to a small group of closely related plant species and even a single species. Biological control takes advantage of this close
relationship. Scientists can spend around five years on host specificity testing, impact assessments and a cost-benefit analysis. Before release, the biological control agent must be
host-specific, damaging to the plant population and the benefits must outweigh the potential risks. These have been widely implemented throughout Africa. Even though these control efforts
have been successful, there is often no continuity in these programmes. Many of them are externally funded and when the funding dries up, programmes are discontinued. When more funding
becomes available the wheel is reinvented despite extensive research being available. This is one of the main reasons biological control is the most cost-effective and sustainable method of
control. Irrespective of funding cycles, the host specific biological control agents work tirelessly, feeding on their target weed. One example of biological control is with the invasive
plant water hyacinth which has infested Lake Victoria. Aquatic weeds were a massive problem in this region, affecting the local fishing industry. It was brought down from 20,000 hectares to
just 2000 over a couple of years using just two biological control agents. These were two weevil species, _Neochetina eichhoriae_ and _N. bruchi_. Massive weed infestations in Lake Kariba,
where the Kariba weed (_Salvinia molesta_) got its common name, were reduced through biological control alone. It reached such low levels that any impact to the community and ecosystem are
considered negligible. TIME FOR AFRICA TO COME TOGETHER With the growing level of research and understanding of the mechanisms behind the invasion of many these aquatic weeds, there is no
reason for them to be a problem. By understanding the processes behind both successful and unsuccessful biological control programmes, current management plans can be adapted for better
results. With the ongoing research in biological control in South Africa, new agents are being cleared for release on a regular basis. The most recent being the delphacid leaf hopper
(_Megamelus scutellaris_) against water hyacinth. One unit in particular is committed to solving aquatic weed problems in Africa using knowledge and capacity grown in Africa. This research
group has already grown capacity in Africa by training master’s and PhD students in aquatic weed biological control from several countries including Mozambique, Ghana, Cameroon, South Africa
and Zimbabwe. The group is also in the process of creating a clearing house for the knowledge on the identification, impacts and control of these weeds. This would involve setting up
networks bringing the right people together, facilitating the control efforts and, probably most importantly, sourcing funding. There is a belief that within Africa there is a growing
capacity, knowledge and enthusiasm to control these weeds. In line with the Millennium Assessment Plan, knowledge created in Africa to solve Africa’s aquatic weed problems is the way
forward. Initially, the clearing house will be set up in South Africa for the spreading of appropriate technology and knowledge. That is with the hope that Africa will take responsibility
for its own aquatic weed problems. The vision and ultimate goal is for there to be aquatic weed combatants at institutions around Africa. The knowledge grown in Africa should be freely
available for people though out the continent willing to take responsibility of a problem in their country, region or maybe just the pond in their back garden. As long as Africa comes
together, there is no reason for aquatic weeds to still be a problem.