Play all audios:
Eduardo Saverin, a Facebook co-founder, renounced his U.S. citizenship just before the company's $16 billion IPO, in what is widely seen as an attempt to avoid paying taxes. The
Brazilian-born Saverin, who became an American citizen in 1992, is being lambasted for ingratitude, with many saying he could not have made his billions without the opportunities afforded
him in America. Democratic senators have introduced legislation, dubbed the Ex-Patriot Act, that would force similar tax dodgers to pay a 30 percent tax rate on their U.S. assets and bar
them from re-entering the country. Some Republicans, like House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), have also denounced Saverin, but notable conservatives, including anti-tax advocate Grover
Norquist and _The Wall Street Journal_ editorial board, are slamming Democrats for behaving like Nazis and Communists. What should we make of this controversy? FOR CONSERVATIVES, THE ENEMY
IS THE U.S. TAX CODE: Saverin's decision to become a citizen of low-tax Singapore reeks of opportunism, says Jay Bookman at _The Atlanta Journal-Constitution_. But anti-tax ideologues
in the conservative movement are claiming that "the United States is simply getting what it deserves for not cutting taxes on the wealthy even lower than they are today."
Conservatives don't seem to realize that the U.S. "cannot be a country in which it is possible to create a behemoth such as Facebook and also be a country in which regulation and
overtaxation have made it impossible to succeed. Both things cannot be true." "Facebook, patriotism, taxes, and fair play" SUBSCRIBE TO THE WEEK Escape your echo chamber. Get
the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives. SUBSCRIBE & SAVE SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News
Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox. From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your
inbox. THIS IS A POLITICAL LOSER FOR REPUBLICANS: "Tax fairness is a central theme for Democrats" this election season, and the Ex-Patriot Act is "an easy opportunity for
Democrats to return to that broad theme," says Sahil Kapur at _Talking Points Memo_. Conservative denunciation of the Democrats' legislation "is putting Republican leaders in
a politically precarious situation," and could force them to "oppose punishing wealthy Americans who renounce their citizenship to duck their legal obligations."
"Conservatives liken Dems' bill banning citizenship tax-dodging to Nazis, Soviets" BUT THE DEMOCRATIC BILL IS LEGALLY DUBIOUS: The Ex-Patriot Act's Democratic sponsors,
Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) and Bob Casey (Penn.), "are showing themselves to be irresponsible legislators by introducing a bill that they explicitly conceived in order to punish"
Saverin, says Conor Friedersdorf at _The Atlantic_. Saverin may deserve our scorn, but "it is imprudent to impulsively introduce legislation in order to target a specific high-profile
individual who happens to be making news," especially for actions that were perfectly legal beforehand. The senators are effectively conducting a trial by legislature, and
"it's an affront to the rule of law." "Why the Ex-Patriot Act is a creepy law"